Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Expression profiling of skeletal muscle following acute and chronic β2-adrenergic stimulation: implications for hypertrophy, metabolism and circadian rhythm

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2 and
  • 1Email author
BMC Genomics200910:448

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-448

  • Received: 15 January 2009
  • Accepted: 23 September 2009
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Systemic administration of β-adrenoceptor (β-AR) agonists has been found to induce skeletal muscle hypertrophy and significant metabolic changes. In the context of energy homeostasis, the importance of β-AR signaling has been highlighted by the inability of β1-3-AR-deficient mice to regulate energy expenditure and susceptibility to diet induced obesity. However, the molecular pathways and gene expression changes that initiate and maintain these phenotypic modulations are poorly understood. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify differential changes in gene expression in murine skeletal muscle associated with systemic (acute and chronic) administration of the β2-AR agonist formoterol.

Results

Skeletal muscle gene expression (from murine tibialis anterior) was profiled at both 1 and 4 hours following systemic administration of the β2-AR agonist formoterol, using Illumina 46K mouse BeadArrays. Illumina expression profiling revealed significant expression changes in genes associated with skeletal muscle hypertrophy, myoblast differentiation, metabolism, circadian rhythm, transcription, histones, and oxidative stress. Differentially expressed genes relevant to the regulation of muscle mass and metabolism (in the context of the hypertrophic phenotype) were further validated by quantitative RT-PCR to examine gene expression in response to both acute (1-24 h) and chronic administration (1-28 days) of formoterol at multiple timepoints. In terms of skeletal muscle hypertrophy, attenuation of myostatin signaling (including differential expression of myostatin, activin receptor IIB, phospho-Smad3 etc) was observed following acute and chronic administration of formoterol. Acute (but not chronic) administration of formoterol also significantly induced the expression of genes involved in oxidative metabolism, including hexokinase 2, sorbin and SH3 domain containing 1, and uncoupling protein 3. Interestingly, formoterol administration also appeared to influence some genes associated with the peripheral regulation of circadian rhythm (including nuclear factor interleukin 3 regulated, D site albumin promoter binding protein, and cryptochrome 2).

Conclusion

This is the first study to utilize gene expression profiling to examine global gene expression in response to acute β2-AR agonist treatment of skeletal muscle. In summary, systemic administration of a β2-AR agonist had a profound effect on global gene expression in skeletal muscle. In terms of hypertrophy, β2-AR agonist treatment altered the expression of several genes associated with myostatin signaling, a previously unreported effect of β-AR signaling in skeletal muscle. This study also demonstrates a β2-AR agonist regulation of circadian rhythm genes, indicating crosstalk between β-AR signaling and circadian cycling in skeletal muscle. Gene expression alterations discovered in this study provides insight into many of the underlying changes in gene expression that mediate β-AR induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy and altered metabolism.

Keywords

  • Skeletal Muscle
  • Circadian Rhythm
  • Formoterol
  • Tibialis Anterior Muscle
  • Myoblast Differentiation

Background

Previous studies have demonstrated that chronic administration of β-adrenoceptor (β-AR) agonists (particularly β2-AR agonists) can increase myofibrillar protein content and thus induce skeletal muscle hypertrophy in mammals [13]. This β2-AR induced hypertrophy is believed to be a result of decreased proteolysis coupled with increased protein synthesis [49]. The ubiquitin-proteasome signaling [8, 10, 11], Ca2+-dependent proteolysis [12] and/or calpain-mediated proteolysis [6, 13, 14] have all been proposed to play a role, however the molecular and cellular pathways altered following β-AR agonist administration remain poorly understood [15].

In addition to hypertrophy, acute exposure of skeletal muscle (and cells) to β-AR agonists has been found to modulate oxidative metabolism, energy expenditure, lipolysis [1621], glucose transport [22], and glucose oxidation [20]. Skeletal muscle accounts for a large proportion of the body's energy demand and thus plays a pivotal role in insulin sensitivity, blood lipid profile and energy balance [23, 24].

Underscoring the importance of β-AR signaling in regulating metabolism, transgenic mice lacking all three β-ARs are susceptible to diet-induced obesity. These animals lack any diet- and cold-induced thermogenic response, indicating that β-ARs play a major role in energy expenditure [25]. Similar to the molecular mechanisms underlying skeletal muscle hypertrophy, our understanding of the pathways regulating the metabolic response to β-AR stimulation have yet to be fully elucidated.

In the context of β-AR signaling and skeletal muscle, we (and others ([26]) have previously demonstrated that acute β-AR signaling markedly and transiently increased the expression of the NR4A subgroup of orphan nuclear receptors (Nur77, Nurr1 and Nor-1) in skeletal muscle tissue and cultures [27, 28]. The induction of the NR4A subgroup was associated with the modulation of critical metabolic genes and cellular metabolism [28, 29] ([2629]. Interestingly, in terms of hypertrophy, knockdown of Nor-1 expression, in vitro, resulted in a >65 fold increase in the expression of myostatin, a key negative regulator of muscle hypertrophy. Such studies suggest that the NR4A subgroup may mediate some effects of β-AR signaling in skeletal muscle.

To examine skeletal muscle gene expression following acute β-AR stimulation, we examined global gene expression in mice using Illumina BeadArrays. Spurlock et al. [30] previously examined global gene expression in skeletal muscle 1 and 10 days after administration of the β2-AR agonist clenbuterol. Spurlock et al. identified genes associated with skeletal muscle growth/hypertrophy, including multiple genes associated with proliferation, differentiation, and the recruitment of satellite cells into muscle fibers. Furthermore, they found an increase in the expression of transcriptional and translational initiators responsible for increasing protein synthesis.

We also performed a comprehensive expression analysis of both the acute (1-24 hours) and chronic (1-28 days) effects of β2-AR agonist administration. We identified changes in the expression of mRNAs encoding genes associated with skeletal muscle hypertrophy, myoblast differentiation, metabolism, circadian rhythm, transcription, histones, and oxidative stress that occur within 4 hours and alter signaling pathways responsible for the long-term phenotypic footprint of b2-AR activation.

Results

Acute systemic administration of the β2-adreneroreceptor agonist, formoterol, induces widespread changes in gene expression in skeletal muscle

The entire data set is available via Gene Expression Omnibus (accession number GSE15793). Expression profiling was performed on 16 mice in total using 46K Illumina Sentrix BeadArray chips. Skeletal muscle samples from 16 independent animals were removed at 1 and 4 hours following a single i.p. injection of the β2-AR agonist, formoterol, or saline (vehicle control). Each timepoint consisted of eight animals with four saline and four formoterol treated animals. The tibialis anterior muscle was chosen for all analyses as it contains predominantly type II fibers, and (in rodents) is known to exhibit marked increases in protein content and lean mass (hypertrophy) in response to β-AR agonist administration [3135].

Using a p value cutoff of p < 0.05 (see methods for full statistical analysis) and a fold change cutoff of 1.85, at one hour following formoterol administration, 23 probes were significantly altered and 112 probes were significantly altered at four hours. Significant annotated genes from both timepoints are shown in table 1. Significant non-annotated genes (Riken cDNAs and hypothetical proteins) are included in Table 2.
Table 1

Significant differentially expressed genes in skeletal muscle after acute systemic administration of β2-AR agonist

Gene Name

Genebank ID

1 HOUR

4 HOURS

Potential Relevant Function

  

change

p-value

change

p-value

 

Growth and myoblast differentiation related

      

Integrin beta 1 binding protein 3 (Itgb1bp3)

XM_125745.1

+ 3.28

NS

+ 3.84

0.023

Regulation of terminal myogenesis

Hairy and enhancer of split 1 (Drosophila) (Hes1)

NM_008235.2

+ 3.58

0.021

+ 1.02

NS

Possible negative regulator of myogenesis

Small mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 3 (Smad3)

NM_016769

+ 1.49

NS

+ 2.20

0.006

Myoblast differentiation

TG interacting factor (Tgif)

NM_009372.2

+ 1.53

NS

+ 2.04

0.033

Smad corepressor

Inhibitor of DNA binding 1 (Idb1)

NM_010495.1

+ 1.79

NS

+ 1.92

0.024

Myoblast differentiation

Fibroblast growth factor 1 (Fgf1)

NM_010197.2

+ 1.27

NS

+ 1.92

0.006

Myoblast differentiation

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3)

NM_011486.2

+ 1.10

NS

+ 1.89

0.028

Myocyte hypertrophy

Small mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 1 (Smad1)

NM_008539.3

+ 1.08

NS

- 1.85

0.006

Myoblast differentiation

Metabolism and mitochondrial related

      

PPARγ coactivator 1 alpha (Pgc-1α)

NM_008904.1

+ 1.53

NS

+ 5.25

0.022

Mitochondrial biogenesis

Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 4 (Pdk4)

NM_013743.1

+ 1.35

NS

+ 2.88

0.016

Pyruvate metabolism

Protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 3C (Ppp1r3c)

NM_016854.1

+ 1.34

NS

+ 2.55

0.021

Glycogen maintenance

Uncoupling protein 3 (Ucp3)

NM_009464.2

+ 1.42

NS

+ 2.37

0.017

Mitochondrial uncoupling

Forkhead box O1 (FoxO1)

NM_019739.2

- 1.03

NS

+ 2.29

0.025

Lipid metabolism

Kinesin family member 1B (Kif1b), transcript variant 1

NM_008441.1

1.00

NS

- 2.28

0.034

Mitochondrial transport

Hexokinase 2 (Hk2)

NM_013820.1

+ 1.53

NS

+ 2.18

0.006

Glycolysis

Phosphomevalonate kinase (Pmvk)

NM_026784.1

+ 1.31

NS

+ 2.07

0.012

Cholesterol/steroid synthesis

Plasma membrane associated protein (S3-12)

NM_020568.1

- 1.02

NS

+ 2.03

0.041

Lipid droplet protein

Lipin 1 (Lpin1)

NM_015763

+ 1.16

NS

+ 2.03

0.011

Lipid metabolism

ATPase, H+ transporting, V1 subunit B, isoform 2 (Atp6v1b2)

NM_007509.2

+ 1.19

NS

+ 2.02

0.012

ATPase

Sorbin and SH3-domains containing 1 (Sorbs1)

NM_009166

+ 1.38

NS

+ 2.01

0.006

Insulin signaling

Scavenger receptor class B member 1 (Scarb1)

NM_016741.1

- 1.40

NS

- 1.91

0.008

Regulation of blood lipids

Peroxisome proliferator activator receptor delta (Pparδ)

NM_011145

+ 1.06

NS

+ 1.87

0.040

Lipid metabolism

Regulation of circadian rhythm

      

Nuclear factor, interleukin 3, regulated (Nfil3)

NM_017373.2

+ 2.06

0.020

+ 5.32

0.014

Negative regulation of circadian clock

D site albumin promoter binding protein (Dbp)

NM_016974.1

- 4.59

0.015

- 3.60

0.021

Regulation of circadian rhythms

Cryptochrome 2 (Cry2)

NM_009963.3

+ 1.25

NS

+ 2.78

0.005

Regulation of circadian rhythms

Transcriptional activation

      

FBJ osteosarcoma oncogene (Fos)

NM_010234.2

+ 5.17

0.041

+ 1.40

NS

Early stress response

Kruppel-like factor 4 (gut) (Klf4)

NM_010637.1

+ 3.97

0.015

+ 2.21

0.039

Anti-proliferative

cAMP responsive element modulator (Crem)

NM_013498.1

+ 1.65

0.025

+ 3.50

0.004

Complex transcriptional regulation

CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta (Cebpb)

NM_009883.1

+ 1.70

NS

+ 3.41

0.007

Negative regulator of cardiac hypertrophy

Nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 2 (Nurr1)

NM_013613.1

+ 3.21

0.015

+ 1.91

0.044

Complex transcriptional regulation

Fos-like antigen 2 (Fosl2)

NM_008037.3

+ 3.00

0.000

+ 1.69

0.032

Regulation of developmental processes

v-maf musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene family, protein F (avian) (Maff)

NM_010755.2

+ 2.58

NS

+ 2.72

0.015

Regulation of acute-phase reaction

Activating transcription factor 3 (Atf3)

NM_007498.2

+ 1.54

NS

+ 2.69

0.039

Regulator of cell proliferation, differentiation, and transformation

Kruppel-like factor 2 (lung) (Klf2)

NM_008452.1

+ 2.44

0.027

+ 1.08

NS

Inhibition of cell proliferation

T-box 3 (Tbx3), transcript variant 2

NM_011535.2

+ 1.29

NS

+ 1.98

0.003

Possible cellular stress response

LPS-induced TN factor (Litaf)

NM_019980.1

+ 2.76

NS

+ 1.87

0.037

Cytokine signaling

Histones

      

Histone 1, H2ai (Hist1h2ai)

NM_178182

- 2.07

NS

- 2.81

0.038

Chromatin structure

Histone 1, H2ao (Hist1h2ao)

NM_178185.1

- 2.07

NS

- 2.62

0.048

Chromatin structure

Oxidative stress

      

Metallothionein (Mt1)

NM_013602.2

+ 3.01

NS

+ 12.18

0.003

Removal of oxidant radicals

Sulfiredoxin 1 homolog (Npn3)

NM_029688.2

+ 1.68

NS

+ 10.61

0.005

Oxidant reduction

Metallothionein 2 (Mt2)

NM_008630.1

+ 2.53

NS

+ 9.53

0.008

Removal of oxidant radicals

Angiogenesis

      

ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 9 (Adamts9)

XM_204236.1

+ 1.76

NS

+ 2.80

0.010

Inhibition of angiogenesis

EGL nine homolog 3 (C. elegans) (Egln3)

NM_028133.1

+ 1.35

NS

+ 2.22

0.042

Hypoxia Response

Platelet derived growth factor alpha (Pdgfa)

NM_008808

- 1.07

NS

- 1.92

0.009

Activation of angiogenesis

Solute carriers

      

Short calcium-binding mitochondrial carrier 2 (Slc25a25)

NM_146118.2

+ 2.98

0.016

+ 3.01

NS

Calcium-dependent mitochondrial solute carrier

Tweety homolog 1 (Drosophila) (Ttyh1)

NM_021324.3

+ 1.34

NS

+ 2.16

0.027

Chloride anion channel

Sodium-dependent vitamin C transporter 2 (Slc23a2)

NM_018824.2

+ 1.07

NS

+ 1.99

0.021

Vitamin C transport

Solute carrier family 10 (sodium/bile acid cotransporter family), member 3 (Slc10a3)

NM_145406.1

+ 1.30

NS

+ 1.93

0.015

Organic anion/sodium transport?

solute carrier family 20, member 1 (Slc20a1)

NM_015747.1

+ 1.81

0.008

+ 1.51

NS

Phosphate transporter

Apoptosis and cell cycle

      

Polo-like kinase 3 (Plk3)

NM_013807.1

+ 2.39

NS

+ 3.52

0.009

Regulation of cell cycle

Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1C (Cdkn1c)

NM_009876.2

- 2.17

NS

- 3.45

0.005

Apoptosis

Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (Cdkn1a)

NM_007669.2

+ 2.28

0.047

+ 3.04

0.019

Apoptosis

S100 calcium binding protein A8 (calgranulin A) (S100a8)

NM_013650.1

- 1.04

NS

+ 2.81

0.039

Cell cycle

DNA-damage-inducible transcript 4-like (Ddit4l)

NM_030143.2

- 1.04

NS

- 2.60

0.032

Apoptosis

Cytokine induced apoptosis inhibitor 1 (Ciapin1)

NM_134141.2

+ 1.21

NS

+ 2.03

0.016

Cytokine-induced inhibitor of apoptosis

Lectin, galactose binding, soluble 3 (Lgals3)

NM_010705.1

- 1.29

NS

+ 1.98

0.019

Possible cell cycle regulator

Cancer and DNA repair

      

Jun-B oncogene (Junb)

NM_008416.1

+ 5.20

0.021

+ 1.81

NS

Cell signaling

AXIN1 up-regulated 1 (Axud1)

NM_153287.2

+ 2.84

0.040

+ 1.49

NS

Tumor suppressor function?

Growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible 45 alpha (Gadd45a)

NM_007836.1

- 1.01

NS

+ 2.03

0.027

Induced by DNA damage

Excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency, complementation 5 (Ercc5)

NM_011729

+ 1.51

0.050

+ 1.93

0.026

Repair of UV-induced DNA damage

Ubiquitin-proteasome system

      

Ubiquitin G (Ubg)

N/A

+ 1.30

NS

+ 2.36

0.003

Ubiquitin-proteasome system

Ubiquitin C (Ubc)

XM_147315.1

+ 1.30

NS

+ 2.24

0.002

Ubiquitin-proteasome system

F-box only protein 34 (Fbxo34)

NM_030236.1

+ 1.17

NS

+ 2.12

0.012

Ubiquitin-proteasome system

Ubiquitin specific protease 2 (Usp2), transcript variant 2

NM_198091.1

- 1.24

NS

+ 2.08

0.032

Ubiquitin-proteasome system

Miscellaneous genes

      

Midnolin (Midn)

NM_021565.1

+ 2.53

NS

+ 4.87

0.002

Neurogenesis

Imprinted and ancient (Impact)

NM_008378.1

+ 2.04

NS

+ 4.70

0.005

Unknown

Emerin (Emd)

NM_007927.1

+ 1.82

NS

+ 4.07

0.005

Nuclear envelope regulation?

Downstream of Stk11 (Dos)

XM_125771

+ 2.25

NS

+ 3.83

0.010

Unknown

Phosphodiesterase 4D (Pde4d)

NM_011056.1

+ 2.06

0.010

+ 3.78

0.014

Regulation of cAMP levels

Interferon gamma inducible protein 30 (Ifi30)

NM_023065.2

+ 1.31

NS

+ 3.23

0.019

Antigen processing

Y box protein 3 (Ybx3)

AK029441

+ 2.59

0.047

+ 2.91

0.010

Unknown

DNA segment, Chr 19, Wayne State University 162, expressed (D19Wsu162e)

NM_146099

+ 1.38

NS

+ 2.85

0.006

Unknown

Alpha-kinase 2 (Alpk2)

XM_128981

+ 1.16

NS

+ 2.82

0.005

Amino acid phosphorylation

Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 12a (Tnfrsf12a)

NM_013749.1

+ 2.11

NS

+ 2.76

0.014

Unknown

Synaptopodin 2-like (Synpo2I)

NM_175132

- 1.12

NS

- 2.70

0.005

May modulate actin shape

Alkaline phosphatase 2 (Akp2)

NM_007431.1

+ 1.59

0.015

+ 2.69

0.028

Phosphatase

Syndecan 4 (Sdc4)

NM_011521.1

+ 1.55

NS

+ 2.68

0.005

Intracellular signaling receptor

Alpha Tubulin 6 (Tuba6)

XM_147357.1

+ 1.14

NS

+ 2.58

0.025

Microtubules formation

Avian musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma (v-maf) AS42 oncogene homolog (Maf)

N/A

+ 1.93

0.040

+ 2.51

0.008

Unknown

Glutamic pyruvate transaminase (alanine aminotransferase) 2 (Gpt2)

NM_173866.1

+ 1.13

NS

+ 2.04

0.032

Amino acid metabolism

Thrombomodulin (Thbd)

NM_009378.1

+ 1.87

0.013

+ 2.02

NS

Anticoagulant pathway

CCR4 carbon catabolite repression 4-like (S. cerevisiae) (Ccrn4l)

NM_009834.1

+ 1.11

NS

+ 2.01

0.041

Predicted transcription factor

Small chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 11 (Ccl11)

NM_011330.1

+ 1.26

NS

+ 1.96

0.010

Cytokine signaling

Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 6 (Map3k6)

NM_016693

+ 1.13

NS

+ 1.94

0.036

MAPK signaling pathway

Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 9 (Ccl9)

NM_011338.2

+ 1.01

NS

+ 1.91

0.018

Cytokine signaling

Microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 alpha (Map1lc3a)

NM_025735.1

+ 1.23

NS

+ 1.90

0.016

Mediates interactions between microtubules and cytoskeleton

MAP kinase-interacting serine/threonine kinase 2 (Mknk2)

NM_021462.2

+ 1.27

NS

+ 1.87

0.017

MAPK signaling pathway

Lymphocyte antigen 6 complex, locus A (Ly6a)

NM_010738.2

- 1.14

NS

+ 1.87

0.018

Cell adhesion and cell signaling

Ssemaphorin 3F (Sema3f)

NM_011349.2

+ 1.47

NS

+ 1.86

0.046

Cell signaling?

Zinc finger protein 46 (Zfp46)

NM_009557.1

- 1.41

NS

- 1.86

0.005

Unknown

Optineurin (Optn)

NM_181848.3

+ 1.20

NS

+ 1.85

0.016

Possible mediator of apoptosis?

Vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (Vasp)

NM_009499

+ 1.12

NS

- 1.85

0.027

Focal adhesion stability

Table 2

Significant differentially expressed non-annotated genes in skeletal muscle after acute systemic administration of β2-AR agonist

Gene Name

Genebank ID

1 HOUR

4 HOURS

  

change

p-value

change

p-value

RIKEN cDNA 3300001A09

XM_134869.3

+ 4.68

NS

+ 5.32

0.042

RIKEN cDNA 1200016E24

XM_489305

+ 4.90

0.016

+ 2.32

NS

cDNA sequence BC036718

NM_153136.1

+ 1.81

NS

+ 3.96

0.004

RIKEN cDNA C330006P03

N/A

+ 1.11

NS

+ 3.78

0.006

RIKEN cDNA B430214A04

NM_146018.1

+ 1.42

NS

+ 3.05

0.004

RIKEN cDNA 6430548M08

NM_172286

+ 1.15

NS

+ 2.94

0.025

RIKEN cDNA A830030H10

AK080627

+ 1.96

NS

+ 2.69

0.025

RIKEN cDNA 4833406M21

N/A

+ 1.38

NS

+ 2.66

0.004

RIKEN cDNA 1300002F13

NM_133753.1

+ 2.54

0.013

+ 1.11

NS

RIKEN cDNA 9530083O12

N/A

+ 2.53

0.013

+ 1.69

NS

RIKEN cDNA 1200015N20

NM_024244.3

- 1.06

NS

+ 2.52

0.010

Hypothetical protein 4933408F15

NM_172715.1

+ 1.24

NS

+ 2.52

0.010

RIKEN cDNA A730009E18

N/A

+ 1.34

NS

+ 2.42

0.005

RIKEN cDNA A430107N12

N/A

+ 1.04

NS

+ 2.21

0.036

RIKEN cDNA 5830446M03

NM_133934.2

+ 1.32

NS

+ 2.14

0.016

Similar to heart alpha-kinase (LOC381181)

XM_355107.1

+ 1.08

NS

+ 2.11

0.009

RIKEN cDNA 2810426P10

XM_148728.1

+ 1.03

NS

+ 2.08

0.008

Weakly similar to protein transport protein SEC24A (SEC24-RELATED PROTEIN A)

AK038836

+ 2.07

0.041

+ 1.29

NS

RIKEN cDNA 2310040A07

N/A

+ 1.06

NS

+ 2.07

0.047

RIKEN cDNA 8030450I18

N/A

+ 1.33

NS

+ 2.05

0.043

RIKEN cDNA 3021401C12

N/A

+ 1.17

NS

+ 1.98

0.015

RIKEN cDNA 2900078C09

N/A

+ 1.46

NS

+ 1.95

0.039

RIKEN cDNA 1110033I14

XM_126635.1

+ 1.72

NS

+ 1.95

0.044

cDNA sequence BC023105

NM_145357

- 1.07

NS

- 1.92

0.039

Functional categorization of genes differentially regulated by β2-AR activation

Genes presented in table 1 were grouped according to their potential relevant function in skeletal muscle. The potential relevant function is based on the authors' opinion gained from a combination of Illumina Gene Ontology classifications, Ingenuity Pathway Analysis http://www.ingenuity.com, Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=omim), and AceView http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/IEB/Research/Acembly/ searches. The Illumina BeadArray expression analysis revealed significant changes in the expression of genes in several functional categories at 1 and 4 hours following formoterol administration, including genes involved in skeletal muscle hypertrophy/growth, myoblast differentiation, metabolism, circadian rhythm, transcription, histones, oxidative stress, angiogenesis, solute carriers, apoptosis, cell cycle, cancer, DNA repair, and the ubiquitin-proteasome system.

Validation of differential gene expression by quantitative RT-PCR

The expression of 16 genes (Stat3, Idb1, Smad1, Smad3, Hk2, Pdk4, Sorbs1, Pgc1α, Lipin1α, FoxO1, Ucp3, Nfil3, Dbp, Nurr1, Crem, and Cebpb) that were identified as differentially expressed by Illumina beadarray analysis (Table 1) and associated with the regulation of skeletal muscle mass, circadian rhythm and metabolism were validated and examined in greater detail following acute (1-24 h) and chronic (1-28 days) formoterol administration via quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR; Figures 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5). All qRT-PCR analyses were performed on an independent/different set of formoterol treated mice (n = 5 per timepoint) than the group used in the Illumina BeadArray study. All 16 gene analyzed by qRT-PCR on independent animals closely mirrored the Illumina changes at both timepoints, highlighting the robust nature of the Illumina platform.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Acute systemic administration of formoterol alters the expression of genes associated with muscle growth and differentiation at multiple timepoints. Quantitative RT-PCR was used to assay the expression of A. Stat3, B. Idb1, C. Smad1, D. Acvr2b, E. Smad3, and F.Myostatin mRNAs in tibialis anterior over acute timepoints. Muscles were removed at 1, 4, 8 and 24 hours following a single intraperitoneal injection of formoterol or saline vehicle (NT = no treatment). Results were normalized against 36B4 at each timepoint. Statistical significance was assessed using a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's post-test where p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**) and p < 0.001 (***). Unmarked data points are non-significant.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Chronic systemic administration of formoterol alters the expression of genes associated with skeletal muscle hypertrophy and myogenesis at multiple timepoints. Quantitative RT-PCR was used to assay the expression of A. Stat3, B. Idb1, C. Smad1, D. Acvr2b, E. Smad3, and F.Myostatin mRNAs in tibialis anterior over chronic timepoints. Muscles were removed at 1, 7 and 28 days following daily intraperitoneal injection of formoterol or saline vehicle (NT = no treatment). Results were normalized against 36B4 at each timepoint. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5). Statistical significance was assessed using a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's post-test where p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**) and p < 0.001 (***). Unmarked data points are non-significant. G. Protein levels of Myostatin precursor (pro-Myostatin), Smad3, phosphorylated Smad3, and Gapdh were visualized by Western blotting performed on tibialis anterior muscle following 28 days of formoterol/saline administration in four animals for each treatment. H. Diagrammatic representation of acute and chronic gene expression changes related to skeletal muscle hypertrophy and myogenesis in response to formoterol.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Acute systemic administration of formoterol alters the expression of genes associated with metabolism. Quantitative RT-PCR was used to assay the expression of A. Hk2, B. Pdk4, C. Sorbs1, D. Pgc1α, E.Lipin1α, F. FoxO1, and G.Ucp3 mRNAs in tibialis anterior over acute timepoints. Muscles were removed at 1, 4, 8 and 24 hours following a single intraperitoneal injection of formoterol or saline vehicle (NT = no treatment). Results were normalized against 36B4 at each timepoint. Statistical significance was assessed using a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's post-test where p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**) and p < 0.001 (***). Unmarked data points are non-significant. G. Diagrammatic representation of acute gene expression changes related to metabolic in skeletal muscle in response to formoterol.

Figure 4
Figure 4

Chronic systemic administration of formoterol alters the expression of genes associated with metabolism. Quantitative RT-PCR was used to assay the expression of A. Hk2, B. Pdk4, C. Sorbs1, D. Pgc1α, E. Lipin1α, F. FoxO1, and G.Ucp3 mRNAs in tibialis anterior over chronic timepoints. Muscles were removed at 1, 7 and 28 days following daily intraperitoneal injection of formoterol or saline vehicle (NT = no treatment). Results were normalized against 36B4 at each timepoint. Statistical significance was assessed using a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's post-test where p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**) and p < 0.001 (***). Unmarked data points are non-significant.

Figure 5
Figure 5

Acute and chronic systemic administration of formoterol alters the expression of genes associated with circadian rhythm and transcriptional regulation. Quantitative RT-PCR was used to assay the expression of A. Nfil3, B. Dbp, C. Nurr1, D. Creb, and E.Cebpb mRNAs in tibialis anterior over acute timepoints. Muscles were removed at 1, 4, 8 and 24 hours following a single intraperitoneal injection of formoterol or saline vehicle (NT = no treatment). For chronic timepoints, the expression of F. Nfil3, G. Dbp, H. Nurr1, I. Creb, and J.Cebpb mRNAs were measured in tibialis anterior removed at 1, 7 and 28 days following daily intraperitoneal injection of formoterol or saline vehicle (NT = no treatment). All results were normalized against 36B4 at each timepoint. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5). Statistical significance was assessed using a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's post-test where p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**) and p < 0.001 (***). Unmarked data points are non-significant.

Formoterol administration alters the expression of genes associated with skeletal muscle hypertrophy and differentiation: attenuation of myostatin signaling

Several differentially expressed genes associated with the regulation of muscle differentiation and mass (identified from the Illumina BeadArray) were examined over an acute and chronic time course of formoterol administration using qRT-PCR. In addition we also examined the expression of myostatin and the myostatin receptor, activin receptor IIB (Acvr2b) that are critical modulators of muscle mass. We examined these genes using qRT-PCR as Acvr2b was down-regulated at 4 hour in the Illumina BeadArray, however it did not pass statistical analysis (data not shown). Tibialis anterior muscle was isolated from groups (n = 5) of male mice, treated with either the specific β2-AR agonist treatment or saline (vehicle control) and assayed at 0, 1, 4, 8 and 24 h post treatment. Significant changes in expression at one or more timepoints were observed in the mRNAs encoding signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3; Figure 1A), inhibitor of DNA binding 1 (Idb1; Figure 1B), small mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 1 (Smad1; Figure 1C), Acvr2b (Figure 1D), and small mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 3 (Smad3; Figure 1E). We did not observe any significant changes in myostatin expression, after acute β2-AR agonist treatment (Figure 1F)

To examine chronic changes induced by formoterol administration, qRT-PCR was used to examine expression of genes from chronically treated mice (after 1, 7 and 28 days of agonist treatment). Similar to acute timepoints, tibialis anterior was isolated from groups (n = 5) of male mice, treated daily with either the specific β2-AR agonist formoterol or saline (vehicle control) and assayed at 0, 1, 7 and 28 days of treatment. Chronic formoterol administration was associated with a significant attenuation in the expression of the mRNAs encoding Idb1 (Figure 2B), Smad3 (Figure 2E) and myostatin (Figure 2F) after 7 or 28 days. No significant changes were observed following chronic formoterol administration in the expression of the mRNAs encoding Stat3 (Figure 2A), Smad1 (Figure 2C), and Acvr2b (Figure 2D), despite significant repression following acute formoterol administration.

To examine the effect of chronic β2-AR agonist treatment on critical regulators of the myostatin signaling pathway we examined the levels of the Myostatin precursor (pro-Myostatin), Smad3, phosphorylated Smad3 relative to Gapdh. We assayed levels by Western blotting analysis of tibialis anterior muscle (contralateral to muscle used for qRT-PCR analysis) following 28 days of formoterol/saline administration in four animals for each treatment (Figure 2G). Consistent with the qRT-PCR data, at the protein level, pro-Myostatin appears subtley (but consistently) suppressed following 28 days of formoterol administration. In concordance, the levels of Smad3 phosphorylation following the chronic formoterol administration are also reduced (in 3 out of 4 mice), while total Smad3 appears unchanged.

In summary, β2-adrenergic stimulation mediates changes in the expression of several genes associated with myostatin signaling, and the regulation of muscle mass (Figure 2H).

Formoterol administration alters the expression of genes associated with metabolism and circadian rhythm

Many genes that regulate and/or are directly involved in metabolism are regulated in a circadian manner. The Illumina BeadArray study identified differential expression of several genes involved in these pathways. Consequently, we utilized qRT-PCR to validate the differential expression of these genes after acute or chronic administration of fomoterol (vs vehicle) in tibialis anterior as detailed above. Significant expression changes at one or more timepoints were observed in several genes involved in metabolism, including, hexokinase 2 (Hk2; Figure 3A), pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 4 (Pdk4; Figure 3B), sorbin and SH3 domain containing 1 (Sorbs1; Figure 3C), PPARγ coactivator 1 alpha (Pgc1α; Figure 3D), Lipin1α (Figure 3E); forkhead box O1 (FoxO1; Figure 3F), and uncoupling protein 3 (Ucp3; Figure 3G). In the context of crosstalk between β-AR signaling and Nor-1 (NR4A3) signaling in skeletal muscle, we have previously identified and examined the induction of Pdk4, Pgc1α, FoxO1, and Lipin1α over following acute β-AR activation [28, 36].

Chronic formoterol administration significantly altered the expression of FoxO1 (Figure 4F) and Ucp3 (Figure 4G) at 7 and 28 days respectively, while Hk2 (Figure 4A), Pdk4 (Figure 4B), Sorbs1 (Figure 4C), Pgc1α (Figure 4D), and Lipin1α (Figure 4E) were not significantly altered.

The expression of two peripheral tissue regulators of circadian rhythm, albumin D-box binding protein (Dbp), and nuclear factor interleukin 3 regulated (Nfil3) were significantly dysregulated by both acute and chronic formoterol administration (Figures 5A, B, F and 5G).

In summary, formoterol administration mediated the significant modulates of several metabolic genes (for example Pgc1α, Lipin1α, Pdk4, FoxO1, Hk2, Ucp3, Sorbs1 etc) associated with the transient induction of oxidative metabolism, particularly following acute stimulation of β-AR's. Interestingly, the expression of these genes was normalized 24 h post treatment, and remained at control levels throughout the 28 days of formoterol administration. In addition, acute and chronic β2-AR agonist treatment significantly regulates the expression of two critical regulators of circadian cycling.

Altered transcriptional regulation following formoterol administration

We have previously demonstrated that β-AR agonists markedly increased the expression of the NR4A subgroup (Nur77, Nurr1 and Nor-1) of nuclear receptor transcription factors in skeletal muscle [2729]. From the Illumina BeadArray, ten transcription factors (not placed in other categories) were induced by formoterol 1 and 4 h post-administration (Table 1). At one or more timepoints, acute administration of formoterol significantly induced nuclear receptor related 1 protein (Nurr1; Figure 5C), cAMP responsive element modulator (Crem; Figure 5D), and CCAAT/enhancer binding protein β (Cebpb; Figure 5E). In contrast, Crem was the only transcription factor to remain elevated throughout the 28 day formoterol administration period (Figure 5I compared to Figures 5H and 5J).

Discussion

A variety of studies have demonstrated that acute (and chronic) β-AR stimulation in skeletal muscle induces hypertrophy, and modulates oxidative metabolism, mitochondrial parameters, energy expenditure, lipolysis [1, 1620], glucose transport [37], and glucose oxidation [20].

To examine gene expression associated with these effects, we utilized Illumina BeadArray gene expression profiling to examine global gene expression in skeletal muscle in response to acute systemic administration (1 and 4 hours) of a specific β2-AR agonist (formoterol). In this study we have revealed that β2-AR agonist treatment altered the expression of several genes associated with myostatin signaling, a previously unreported effect of β-AR signaling in skeletal muscle. This is also the first study to demonstrate a β2-AR agonist regulation of circadian rhythm genes, indicating crosstalk between β-AR signaling and circadian cycling in skeletal muscle

Skeletal muscle hypertrophy and myoblast differentiation

Previous studies have demonstrated that systemic administration of β2-AR agonists induces hypertrophy in both skeletal and cardiac muscle [13, 38]. Furthermore, β2-AR agonists have been found to prevent or reverse the muscle wasting and weakness associated with numerous conditions [for review see Ryall & Lynch, 2008 [15]]. However, the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying these changes have yet to be fully elucidated. The scientific literature is not consistent on whether β-AR agonists increase myofibrilar protein mass during hypertrophy by increased protein biosynthesis, decreased proteolysis, or both.

Reeds et al. [4] suggested that β-AR agonists do not increase global protein biosynthesis, however recent reports suggested that β-AR agonists increase the expression of several contractile proteins [30, 39, 40], myogenin [41], and initiators of protein translation [30]. In addition to effects on protein synthesis a number of studies have attributed increased myofibrilar protein content to an inhibition of myofibrilar proteolysis [4, 8, 42], possibly via inhibition of ubiquitin-proteasome mediated degradation [8, 10, 11], Ca2+-dependent proteolysis [12] or calpain-mediated proteolysis [6, 13, 14].

At the molecular level, the gene ankyrin repeat and SOCS box protein Asb15, known to promote protein synthesis and myoblast differentiation, has been found to be induced by β-AR stimulation [4346]. Similarly, both Igf1 and Igf2 mRNA expression has been observed to increase following chronic systemic administration of β-AR agonists, suggesting the involvement of these growth factors in hypertrophy [40, 47]. Interestingly, in the current study no significant acute changes were observed in Asb15 or Igf1 (data not shown), however Igf2 expression was down-regulated (non-significantly; data not shown) after four hours, a result that is not consistent with these previous studies [40, 47].

We have also included a more detailed table (Table 3), which compares the Illumina BeadArray information in this study to previously published hypotheses on β-AR agonist-induced hypertrophy.
Table 3

Summary of previous reports describing the known molecular effects of β-AR agonist-induced hypertrophy in skeletal muscle

β-AR agonist-induced hypertrophy hypothesis

Reference(s)

Comparison to our study

Increased expression of skeletal muscle contractile proteins

[30, 39, 40]

No significant changes were observed in contractile proteins at 1 and 4 hours in our Illumina array data. In the previous referenced studies, contractile proteins were only examined following chronic β-AR agonist administration. Increased myosin heavy chain was observed at protein level [39], and may not be present at mRNA level.

Increased mRNA expression of myogenin, a key developmental regulator of functional skeletal muscle

[30]

No significant changes were observed in myogenin at 1 and 4 hours in our Illumina array data. In Spurlock et al. [30], increased myogenin mRNA expression was only observed at 24 hours following β-AR agonist administration. Our earlier timepoints may miss this change.

Increased expression of initiators of protein translation

[30]

Our Illumina array data showed no significant changes in any genes that are known initiators of protein translation. In Spurlock et al. [30], increased expression of mRNA encoding initiators of protein translation were observed mainly at 24 hours following β-AR agonist administration. Our earlier timepoints may miss these changes.

Decreased myofibrilar proteolysis via inhibition of the ATP-ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic system

[8, 10, 11]

We observed the induction of four genes associated with ubiquitin-proteolytic system (Ubg, Ubc, Fbxo34 and Usp2). This is in contrast to the referenced studies that demonstrated inhibition of the ATP-ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic system via chronic β-AR agonist administration on skeletal muscle. The induction we observed may represent a mechanism whereby acute β-AR signaling induces proteolysis for myofibril repair following exercise (which is known to induce β-AR signaling [75]).

Decreased myofibrilar proteolysis via Ca2+-dependent or calpain-mediated proteolysis

[12]

Our Illumina array data showed no significant changes in any genes associated with calpain-mediated or other Ca2+-dependent proteolytic genes.

Decreased expression of SOCS box protein Asb15, which is a negative regulator of protein synthesis and myoblast differentiation

[4346]

We did not observe repression (or induction) of Asb15 mRNA in the Illumina array data at either timepoint. In the referenced studies, Asb15 is repressed at 12-24 hours. Our earlier timepoints may miss this expression change, however there is the potential for a transcription factor listed in our study to repress Asb15.

Induction of Igf1 mRNA expression

[30]

We did not observe any induction of Igf1 in the Illumina array data at either timepoint. In Spurlock et al. [30], increased expression of Igf1 was observed mainly at 24 hours post β-AR agonist administration.

Induction of Igf2 mRNA expression

[40, 47]

Igf2 was repressed 2.61 fold, however this was removed due to multiple testing correction. Although this result is not consistent with the referenced previous studies, Igf2 mRNA in these previous studies was only examined after chronic β-AR agonist administration.

In our study, Illumina BeadArray expression profiling analysis revealed several gene expression changes associated with the regulation of skeletal muscle mass and myoblast differentiation. From the array (and qRT-PCR), we observed alterations in Stat3, and Smad3, Acvr2b three genes directly associated with the regulation of muscle hypertrophy. Both Acvr2b (a key myostatin receptor) and Smad3 are downstream mediators of myostatin, a well-characterized negative regulator of muscle mass. With qRT-PCR, we also observed a subtle, but significant attenuation of the mRNAs encoding myostatin in response to chronic β2-AR agonist treatment, however this was not detected by the acute Illumina analysis. This is concordant with the chronic effects of formoterol administration on skeletal muscle, and could provide a partial mechanistic basis for hypertrophy.

While muscle growth from β-AR agonists is associated with hypertrophy, enhancement of myogenesis could lead to proliferation, differentiation, and/or recruitment of satellite cells into muscle fibers to promote muscle growth. We observed significant changes in Itgb1bp3, Smad1, Smad3, FoxO1 (listed under metabolism in Table 1) and, Idb1, genes believed to play an important role in regulating myogenesis. We observed significant changes in Smad1 expression, and while closely related to Smad3, Smad1 has not been associated with skeletal muscle hypertrophy, however it may have a role in the regulation of myogenesis [48]. A complex of Smad1 and 4 has been shown to transactivate Id1 [49], another myogenic gene altered by formoterol administration. Interestingly, we observed a significant repression of FoxO1, a negative regulator of myogenesis, following 28 days of formoterol administration [5052], thus suggesting β2-AR agonist enhance myogenesis in the context of chronic treatment. Furthermore, myostatin may also be a transcriptionaly regulated by FoxO1 [53], possibly suggesting coordinate regulation of hypertrophy and myogenesis via multiple mechanisms including Fox01/myostatin signaling. Moreover, we have performed Western (immunoblot) analysis on the tibialis anterior muscle from 28 day vehicle (saline) and β2-AR agonist treatment (formoterol) treated mice (n = 4 mice per treatment). This demonstrated that formoterol treatment suppressed expression of pro-Myostatin, and the levels of phospho-Smad3. These observations are in concordance with the attenuation of the myostatin signaling pathway and therefore the hypertrophic phenotype [54, 55].

In summary, formoterol administration induced significant changes in genes associated with skeletal muscle hypertrophy and myogenesis. A broad overview of these expression changes are provided in Figure 2H, notably highlighting possible crosstalk between β-AR signaling and myostatin/Smad3 signaling pathway.

Metabolism

Many previous studies have implicated β-AR signaling in the control of metabolism. Mice lacking all three β-AR are unable to effectively regulate energy expenditure and thus develop obesity on a high-fat diet [25]. In terms of skeletal muscle, β-AR agonist administration has been found to modulate oxidative metabolism, energy expenditure, lipolysis [1, 1620], glucose transport [22] glucose oxidation [20] and mitochondrial morphology [56]. In the current study we found that formoterol administration significantly induced the expression of 14 genes associated with metabolism and mitochondrial function greater than 1.85 fold (Table 1). These consisted of genes involved in lipid regulation and metabolism, including Lipin1α, FoxO1, scavenger receptor class B member 1 (Scarb1), phosphomevalonate kinase (Pmvk), plasma membrane associated protein (S3-12), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (Pparγ), and Ucp3. The largest change observed was the induction of Pgc-1α, a key transcriptional regulator of oxidative metabolism and regulator of skeletal muscle fiber type and therefore lipid metabolism. Genes involved in glucose metabolism/storage and insulin signaling were up-regulated, Pdk4, protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 3C (Ppp1r3c), and Hk2.

Several of these genes have been previously identified in our studies following in vitro and in vivo treatment of muscle with a β2-AR agonist. For example, the induction of the mRNAs encoding Pgc1α, Lipin1α, Pdk4 and FoxO1 in skeletal muscle were identified in our study [28] and that of Miura et al. [36].

Interestingly, the expression levels of Pgc1α, Lipin1 and FoxO1 have also been found to be increased following exercise [57], suggesting β2-AR treatment may imitate some functions and/or effects of exercise.

Circadian Rhythm

Skeletal muscle, like most other tissues, is known to have a peripheral circadian clock, characterized by the expression of peripheral clock genes. It is thought that the regulation of these peripheral circadian clocks is ultimately regulated and synchronized by a central circadian clock located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the brain, however the exact mechanism of communication to skeletal muscle remains unclear.

As previous studies have implicated β-AR signaling as a mediator of circadian rhythm [5862], it is of interest that we observed the dysregulation of three peripheral clock genes by formoterol administration (Table 1), including nuclear factor, interleukin 3 (Nfil3), D site albumin promoter binding protein (Dbp), and cryptochrome 2 (Cry2). The observation, that only a subset of peripheral clock genes were dysregulated by formoterol administration suggests regulation of these genes is occurring at an organ specific level and not via direct actions on the central circadian clock since interference to the central circadian clock should result in changes to the majority of peripheral clock genes. Furthermore, as only a small fraction of known circadian-regulated genes in skeletal muscle are being altered in our study (compared to McCarthy et al. [63]), this suggests that these results are valid and not occurring due to minor timing issues that occur during tissue collection.

Adrenergic regulation of the related clock gene cryptochrome 1 (Cry1) has been previously reported in the rat pineal glands [59, 64]. In addition, Cry1 has been shown to be regulated by resistance exercise, a stimulus known to increase sympathetic activity in skeletal muscle [65]. This further underscores the crosstalk between exercise, and β2-AR signaling in the context of peripheral circadian control.

The central role of circadian rhythm in skeletal muscle metabolism is highlighted by the circadian changes in glucose utilization in muscle, and the findings that disruption of skeletal muscle circadian rhythm occurs in diabetic rats [66]. Furthermore, major changes to peripheral clock genes have been found to be increased by altering the activity of AMP kinase, a key metabolic regulator of skeletal muscle [67]. Interestingly, AMPK modulators have been recently described as exercise mimics [68].

Interestingly, a limited number of genes highlighted in this study have been shown to be regulated in the circadian transcriptome of adult mouse skeletal muscle [63]. Cry2, Dbp, Ucp3, Pdk4, Ubc, Pgc1α, and Usp2 have been shown to be regulated in the circadian transcriptome, possibly suggesting that these metabolic transcripts and Usp2 may be regulated by dysregulated clock genes rather than directly by β-AR signaling. However, some genes such as Pgc1α have a well characterized induction pathway involving β-AR signaling independent of circadian regulation [69].

In conclusion, this is the first paper to show regulation of the peripheral circadian regulators in skeletal muscle by β-AR signaling, possibly implicating β-AR (sympathetic) signaling as a pathway that coordinates communication between central and peripheral circadian clocks in skeletal muscle.

Transcription and histones

Spurlock et al. [30] have previously used microarray technology to examine skeletal muscle gene expression following chronic β-AR administration. In this study the authors found an up-regulation of transcriptional and translational initiators responsible for increasing protein synthesis. In this context, we observed the induction of 11 genes (Table 1) noted as transcription factors (although some transcription factors are in other categories eg. FoxO1). The 11 induced transcriptional regulators were FBJ osteosarcoma oncogene (Fos), kruppel-like factors 2 and 4 (Klf2 and 4), cAMP responsive element modulator (Crem), CAAT/enhancer binding protein beta (Cebpb), nuclear receptor related 1 protein (Nurr1), fos-like antigen 2 (Fosl2), V-maf musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene family protein F (Maff), activating transcription factor 3 (Aft3), T-box 3 (Tbx3), transcript variant 2, and LPS-induced TN factor (Litaf).

Interestingly, concomitant with transcriptional induction, our Illumina analysis revealed that β2-AR stimulation significantly inhibited the expression of two histone proteins (also four more histones were present at >2 fold, but these were removed via multiple testing correction), suggesting that β-AR stimulation promote the formation of euchromatin, thus enhancing transcription. This result, coupled with the induction of transcription factors, indicates β-AR signaling may play an important role in regulating skeletal muscle transcription.

Oxidative stress

In our study, many of the largest inductions occurred in genes associated with the response to oxidative stress. Metallothioneins 1 and 2 (Mt1, 2), sulfiredoxin 1 homolog (Npn3), and uncoupling protein 3 (Ucp3; listed under metabolism) were all significantly induced at four hours after formoterol administration. During exercise, reactive oxygen species (ROS) are generated in skeletal muscle [70, 71], and some oxidative damage occurs [72]. Excess ROS may lead to cellular damage, which has been implicated in with the development of insulin resistance [73], and apoptosis of myoblasts [74]. Given that exercise induces β-AR signaling activity in skeletal muscle [75], this activity may provide a mechanism for increased expression of antioxidant genes to restore oxidative homeostasis. This is supported by the work of Mahoney et al [57], who demonstrated that exercise induced a wide range of antioxidant genes, including several metallothioneins. Furthermore, induction of both Ucp2 and Ucp3 has also been shown previously to be induced by β-AR signaling in exercising skeletal muscle [27, 7678]. Since Ucp3 and Ucp2 have been implicated in the reduction of ROS [79, 80], it is possible that the induction of Ucp3 and Ucp2 expression in skeletal muscle is one mechanism for reducing ROS production during or after exercise.

Conclusion

This study utilized gene expression profiling to examine global gene expression in skeletal muscle following acute and long-term (chronic) β-AR agonist administration. In summary, systemic administration of formoterol had a profound effect on global gene expression in skeletal muscle. With respect to skeletal muscle hypertrophy, formoterol altered the expression of several genes associated with the attenuation of myostatin signaling, highlighting the role of β-AR signaling in the mechanisms regulating skeletal muscle mass

Interestingly, many changes in gene expression with β-AR signaling are similar to findings from other studies examining exercise-related effects in skeletal muscle. For example, the changes in expression of Pgc1α, FoxO1, Ucp3, the NR4A subgroup and severalmetallothioneins are identical in both systems [57, 65]. This would suggest the induction of β-AR signaling during exercise is a major determinant of the subsequent changes in gene expression changes following exercise.

The findings also demonstrate for the first time crosstalk between β-AR signaling and the peripheral regulators of circadian rhythm in skeletal muscle, possibly implicating β-AR signaling in circadian effects on skeletal muscle. Gene expression changes discovered in the present study may provide insight into the mechanisms underlying β-AR-mediated changes in skeletal muscle hypertrophy and metabolism.

Methods

Animals, β-AR agonist administration and tissue collection

All procedures were approved by the Animal Experimentation Ethics Committees of The University of Melbourne. All procedures conformed to the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Experimental Animals described by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. Male C57BL/10 ScSn (wild type, 6-7 weeks old) were obtained from the Animal Resource Centre (Canning Vale, WA, Australia) and were randomly assigned to either saline control, formoterol (a specific β2-AR agonist) treated or non-treated groups. For BeadArray analysis, 16 mice in total were analyzed with eight mice for both timepoints. At each timepoint, four mice were treated with formoterol and four with saline (n = 4 mice per timepoint per treatment). For quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis, ten mice were used per timepoint with five formoterol treated and five saline formoterol animals. Five mice were also analyzed as non-treated animals (n = 5 mice per timepoint per treatment). The animals used for quantitative real-time PCR were independent animals to that used for BeadArray analysis. The mice were housed in the Biological Research Facility at The University of Melbourne and maintained on a 12 h-light/12 h-dark cycle, with standard mouse chow and water provided ad libitum.

Treated mice received a single intraperitoneal injection of formoterol (Astra-Zeneca: 100 μg/kg in 0.2 mL saline) and control mice received an equivalent volume of sterile saline. We have demonstrated previously that this is the most efficacious dose for eliciting skeletal muscle hypertrophy in rodents [3]. For chronic treatment timepoints, mice received a single intraperitoneal injection of formoterol (Astra-Zeneca: 100 μg/kg in 0.2 mL saline) daily and control mice received an equivalent volume of sterile saline daily.

Mice were anesthetized at 1, 4, 8, and 24 hours after acute treatment with formoterol and at 7 and 28 days after chronic formoterol administration. Following anesthetization, tibialis anterior muscles were surgically excised. Tissue was also removed from anesthetized untreated mice (n = 5) that did not receive an intraperitoneal injection for qRT-PCR "no treatment" controls. Tissue from "no treatment" was removed at time zero following injections of the treatment mice. All injections were carried out at approximately 3 hours within the light cycle and muscle was removed at relative appropriate intervals during the light cycle. Care was taken to administer formoterol and saline injections as close as possible to negate gene expression changes associated with circadian rhythm. For chronic treatments injections, were carried out at approximately 3 hours within the light cycle and muscle was removed 24 hours following the last injection. Due to concerns about stress hormones in acute timepoints, both saline control and formoterol treated animals were handled and injected in the same manner. Non-treated animals were also included with the qRT-PCR data to provide an indication of any stress related gene expression changes. As the non-treated animals were quickly anesthetized, stress related gene expression changes should be avoided.

All samples were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -70°C. Samples were used for RNA extraction for BeadArray analysis and qRT-PCR. Contralateral tibialis anterior muscle samples were also used for Western blot analysis.

RNA extraction for quantitative real-time PCR

RNA was extracted from skeletal muscle tissue using TRI-Reagent (Sigma Aldrich) according to the manufacturer's protocol. For qRT-PCR only, RNA was treated with 2U of Turbo DNase (Ambion) for 30 minutes. RNA was further purified using a mini-RNeasy kit (QIAGEN) according to manufacturer's instructions and quantified using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer.

cDNA synthesis for quantitative real-time PCR

cDNA was synthesized from 3 μg of total RNA for cell culture experiments and 1 μg for animal muscle experiments (normalized via UV spectroscopy) using Superscript III primed by random hexamers (Geneworks), according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen).

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and statistical analysis

Target cDNA levels were compared by qRT-PCR in 25 μl reactions containing either 1× SYBR green (Applied Biosystems) or Taqman PCR master mix (Roche Molecular Systems), 100 nM of each forward and reverse primers for SYBR green or 1× Assay-on-Demand Taqman primers (Applied Biosystems) and the equivalent of 0.3 μL cDNA. Using an ABI Prism 7500 (Applied Biosystems) sequence detection system, PCR was conducted over 45 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds and 60°C for 1 minute, preceded by an initial 95°C for 10 minutes. Expression levels were normalized to 36B4 as determined from the ratio of delta CT values. All 36B4 probes remained stable during Illumina BeadArray analysis, confirming this gene was appropriate for normalization. Results are expressed as means ± SEM from five biological replicates. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software. All qRT-PCR data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's post-test.

qRT-PCR primers

Primers for qRT-PCR analysis of the mRNA populations using SYBR green have been described in detail for 36B4 [81], Ucp3 ([82], Nurr1 [83], Pdk4 [28], and Pgc1α ([82]. The following SYBR primers were designed using Primer Express (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA): Sorbs1 (F:5'-GTG CCA CAG AAC GAT GAT GAG T-3'; R:5'-AAG TAC CAA ACT GCC TCG TCC TT-3'), Id1 (F:5'-GCA GGT GAA CGT CCT GCT CTA-3'; R:5'-TCT CCA CCT TGC TCA CTT TGC-3'), Activin receptor IIB (F:5'-ACG TGG CGG AGA CGA TGT-3'; R:5'-GTG AGG TCG CTC TTC AGC AG TAC-3'), Hk2 (F:5'-TTA GGT CAG TCG GCG TTT CAG-3'; R:5'-TAG GAG GGC AAA TAA ATG TAC AAA CA-3'), Nfil3 (F:5'-CGG TTA CAG CCG CCC TTT-3'; R:5'-GTT GTC CGG CAC AGG GTA AAT-3'), and Stat3 (F:5'-GAG GAG GCA TTT GGA AAG TAC TGT A-3'; R:5'-GTC ACA CAG ATG AAC TTG GTC TTC A-3'). Assay-on-Demand Taqman primer/probe sets were used to assay expression of myostatin, Crem, Crebp, Dbp, FoxO1, and Lipin1α.

BeadArray hybridization and statistical analysis

For BeadArray analysis, 16 mice in total were analyzed with eight mice for both timepoints. At each timepoint, four formoterol treated and four saline formoterol animals. Total skeletal muscle RNA was assessed for integrity using the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 and RNA integrity (RIN) scores above 8.3 were present in all samples. 500 ng of RNA was amplified using the Illumina TotalPrep RNA Amplification kit (Ambion) with an in vitro transcription reaction period of 12 hours. Biotinylated, amplified cRNA was assessed for quantity and quality also using the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100. 1500 ng per array of amplified cRNA was hybridized to Sentrix Mouse-6.v1 BeadChip arrays (Illumina) according to manufacturer directions. Hybridized BeadChip arrays were stained with Amersham fluorolink streptavidin-Cy3 (GE Healthcare). BeadChip arrays were scanned with Illumina BeadStation Scanner and data values with detection scores were compiled using BeadStudio v1.5.1.3 (Illumina) and imported into GeneSpring GX v7.3.1 (Agilent) for data analysis. Mouse Illumina probe set was defined in the GeneSpring Workgroup using the Illumina targetIDs as the unique identifiers and annotated according to array content files supplied by Illumina. Normalized data was produced using GeneSpring GX version 7.3.1 via normalization to control genes, where control genes were represented by all genes with an Illumina detection score equal to one in at least four out of the 16 samples (7,596 control genes in total). All probes except for the 7,596 probes that were determined to have an Illumina detection score equal to one in at least four out of the 16 samples were filtered out to remove probes without adequate expression levels. A parametric Welch's t-test (where variances were not assumed equal) was performed on the 7,596 probes independently for both one and four hour times groups with a p-value cutoff of 0.05. Multiple testing correction (Benjamini and Hochberg False Discovery Rate) was then applied to genes that had passed the parametric Welch's t-test based on the total detected probe-set of 7,596 probes to reduce false positives. About 5.0% of the identified probes would be expected to pass the restriction by chance. Following this statistical filtering, 393 probes were significant at four hours and 43 probes at one hour. Statistical filtered probe-sets were then independently filtered by fold change using a minimum cutoff of 1.85 fold. Following this, 112 probes were present at four hours and 23 genes at one hour. Multiple significant probes for the same gene were removed from final data tables with the probe with the highest fold change being chosen.

Western blot analysis

Whole skeletal muscle lysates were prepared from homogenisation and sonication in lysis buffer [50 mM Tris HCl, 75 mM NaCl, 5 mM EGTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1% Nonidet P-40, Complete protease inhibitors (Roche Diagnostics Australia), and PhosSTOP phosphatase inhibitors (Roche Diagnostics Australia)] and resolved on 10% SDS-PAGE gels under reducing conditions as outlined [84]. Proteins were transferred to an Immobilon-P polyvinyl difluoride membrane (Millipore) and blocked for 1 h with 5% non-fat milk powder in tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween 20. Blots were probed overnight with anti-Myostatin (sc-6884; Santa Cruz) at 1:300 and anti-Gapdh (R&D Systems) at 1:10000 in blocking buffer. Blots were also probed overnight with anti-Smad3 (#9523; Cell Signaling) at 1:1000 and anti-phospho-Smad3 (#9520; Cell Signaling) at 1:1000 in 5% fraction V BSA (Sigma-Aldrich) in tris-buffered saline. Secondary anti-rabbit-horseradish peroxidase conjugate (Pierce Biotechnology) in blocking buffer was used at 1:10000 for Gapdh, Smad3, and phospho-Smad3 for 1 h. Secondary anti-goat-horseradish peroxidase conjugate (Pierce Biotechnology) in blocking buffer was used at 1:10000 for Myostatin for 1 h. Horseradish peroxidase localization was detected with Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate (Millipore) according to the manufacturer's instructions and visualized by X-ray film.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

GEOM is a Principal Research Fellow of the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC), and this study was supported by an NHMRC project grant. The authors would also like to thank the SRC Microarray Facility at the Institute for Molecular Bioscience, the University of Queensland, for RNA conversion, Illumina BeadChip hybridization and data collection. This microarray research was supported by the Australian Research Council's, Special Research Centre for Functional and Applied Genomics (Institute for Molecular Bioscience) Microarray Facility.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Queensland, 4072, Australia
(2)
Basic and Clinical Myology Laboratory, Department of Physiology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia

References

  1. Dodd SL, Powers SK, Vrabas IS, Criswell D, Stetson S, Hussain R: Effects of clenbuterol on contractile and biochemical properties of skeletal muscle. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996, 28 (6): 669-676.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Agbenyega ET, Wareham AC: Effect of clenbuterol on normal and denervated muscle growth and contractility. Muscle Nerve. 1990, 13 (3): 199-203. 10.1002/mus.880130305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ryall JG, Sillence MN, Lynch GS: Systemic administration of beta2-adrenoceptor agonists, formoterol and salmeterol, elicit skeletal muscle hypertrophy in rats at micromolar doses. Br J Pharmacol. 2006, 147 (6): 587-595. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706669.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Reeds PJ, Hay SM, Dorwood PM, Palmer RM: Stimulation of muscle growth by clenbuterol: lack of effect on muscle protein biosynthesis. Br J Nutr. 1986, 56 (1): 249-258. 10.1079/BJN19860104.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Maltin CA, Hay SM, Delday MI, Smith FG, Lobley GE, Reeds PJ: Clenbuterol, a beta agonist, induces growth in innervated and denervated rat soleus muscle via apparently different mechanisms. Biosci Rep. 1987, 7 (6): 525-532. 10.1007/BF01116510.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Koohmaraie M, Shackelford SD, Muggli-Cockett NE, Stone RT: Effect of the beta-adrenergic agonist L644,969 on muscle growth, endogenous proteinase activities, and postmortem proteolysis in wether lambs. J Anim Sci. 1991, 69 (12): 4823-4835.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Rogers KL, Fagan JM: Effect of beta agonists on protein turnover in isolated chick skeletal and atrial muscle. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1991, 197 (4): 482-485.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Busquets S, Figueras MT, Fuster G, Almendro V, Moore-Carrasco R, Ametller E, Argiles JM, Lopez-Soriano FJ: Anticachectic effects of formoterol: a drug for potential treatment of muscle wasting. Cancer Res. 2004, 64 (18): 6725-6731. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0425.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Navegantes LC, Resano NM, Baviera AM, Migliorini RH, Kettelhut IC: CL 316,243, a selective beta3-adrenergic agonist, inhibits protein breakdown in rat skeletal muscle. Pflugers Arch. 2006, 451 (5): 617-624. 10.1007/s00424-005-1496-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Costelli P, Garcia-Martinez C, Llovera M, Carbo N, Lopez-Soriano FJ, Agell N, Tessitore L, Baccino FM, Argiles JM: Muscle protein waste in tumor-bearing rats is effectively antagonized by a beta 2-adrenergic agonist (clenbuterol). Role of the ATP-ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic pathway. J Clin Invest. 1995, 95 (5): 2367-2372. 10.1172/JCI117929.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Yimlamai T, Dodd SL, Borst SE, Park S: Clenbuterol induces muscle-specific attenuation of atrophy through effects on the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. J Appl Physiol. 2005, 99 (1): 71-80. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00448.2004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Navegantes LC, Resano NM, Migliorini RH, Kettelhut IC: Catecholamines inhibit Ca(2+)-dependent proteolysis in rat skeletal muscle through beta(2)-adrenoceptors and cAMP. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2001, 281 (3): E449-454.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bardsley RG, Allcock SM, Dawson JM, Dumelow NW, Higgins JA, Lasslett YV, Lockley AK, Parr T, Buttery PJ: Effect of beta-agonists on expression of calpain and calpastatin activity in skeletal muscle. Biochimie. 1992, 74 (3): 267-273. 10.1016/0300-9084(92)90125-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Parr T, Bardsley RG, Gilmour RS, Buttery PJ: Changes in calpain and calpastatin mRNA induced by beta-adrenergic stimulation of bovine skeletal muscle. Eur J Biochem. 1992, 208 (2): 333-339. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb17191.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lynch GS, Ryall JG: Role of beta-adrenoceptor signaling in skeletal muscle: implications for muscle wasting and disease. Physiological reviews. 2008, 88 (2): 729-767. 10.1152/physrev.00028.2007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hagstrom-Toft E, Enoksson S, Moberg E, Bolinder J, Arner P: beta-Adrenergic regulation of lipolysis and blood flow in human skeletal muscle in vivo. Am J Physiol. 1998, 275 (6 Pt 1): E909-916.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fagher B, Liedholm H, Monti M, Moritz U: Thermogenesis in human skeletal muscle as measured by direct microcalorimetry and muscle contractile performance during beta-adrenoceptor blockade. Clin Sci (Lond). 1986, 70 (5): 435-441.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Simonsen L, Bulow J, Madsen J, Christensen NJ: Thermogenic response to epinephrine in the forearm and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue. Am J Physiol. 1992, 263 (5 Pt 1): E850-855.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Blaak EE, Van Baak MA, Kemerink GJ, Pakbiers MT, Heidendal GA, Saris WH: Beta-adrenergic stimulation of energy expenditure and forearm skeletal muscle metabolism in lean and obese men. Am J Physiol. 1994, 267 (2 Pt 1): E306-315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoeks J, van Baak MA, Hesselink MK, Hul GB, Vidal H, Saris WH, Schrauwen P: Effect of beta1- and beta2-adrenergic stimulation on energy expenditure, substrate oxidation, and UCP3 expression in humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2003, 285 (4): E775-782.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Blaak EE, Schiffelers SL, Saris WH, Mensink M, Kooi ME: Impaired beta-adrenergically mediated lipolysis in skeletal muscle of obese subjects. Diabetologia. 2004, 47 (8): 1462-1468. 10.1007/s00125-004-1471-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Nevzorova J, Bengtsson T, Evans BA, Summers RJ: Characterization of the beta-adrenoceptor subtype involved in mediation of glucose transport in L6 cells. Br J Pharmacol. 2002, 137 (1): 9-18. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704845.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Baron AD, Laakso M, Brechtel G, Edelman SV: Reduced capacity and affinity of skeletal muscle for insulin-mediated glucose uptake in noninsulin-dependent diabetic subjects. Effects of insulin therapy. J Clin Invest. 1991, 87 (4): 1186-1194. 10.1172/JCI115117.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Perseghin G: Muscle lipid metabolism in the metabolic syndrome. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2005, 16 (4): 416-420. 10.1097/01.mol.0000174401.07056.56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bachman ES, Dhillon H, Zhang CY, Cinti S, Bianco AC, Kobilka BK, Lowell BB: betaAR signaling required for diet-induced thermogenesis and obesity resistance. Science. 2002, 297 (5582): 843-845. 10.1126/science.1073160.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Chao LC, Zhang Z, Pei L, Saito T, Tontonoz P, Pilch PF: Nur77 coordinately regulates expression of genes linked to glucose metabolism in skeletal muscle. Mol Endocrinol. 2007, 21 (9): 2152-2163. 10.1210/me.2007-0169.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pearen MA, Ryall JG, Maxwell MA, Ohkura N, Lynch GS, Muscat GE: The orphan nuclear receptor, NOR-1, is a target of beta-adrenergic signaling in skeletal muscle. Endocrinology. 2006, 147 (11): 5217-5227. 10.1210/en.2006-0447.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pearen MA, Myers SA, Raichur S, Ryall JG, Lynch GS, Muscat GE: The Orphan Nuclear Receptor, NOR-1, a Target of {beta}-Adrenergic Signaling, Regulates Gene Expression that Controls Oxidative Metabolism in Skeletal Muscle. Endocrinology. 2008, 149 (6): 2853-2865. 10.1210/en.2007-1202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Maxwell MA, Cleasby ME, Harding A, Stark A, Cooney GJ, Muscat GE: Nur77 regulates lipolysis in skeletal muscle cells. Evidence for cross-talk between the beta-adrenergic and an orphan nuclear hormone receptor pathway. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280 (13): 12573-12584. 10.1074/jbc.M409580200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Spurlock DM, McDaneld TG, McIntyre LM: Changes in skeletal muscle gene expression following clenbuterol administration. BMC Genomics. 2006, 7: 320-10.1186/1471-2164-7-320.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Maltin CA, Hay SM, Delday MI, Reeds PJ, Palmer RM: Evidence that the hypertrophic action of clenbuterol on denervated rat muscle is not propranolol-sensitive. Br J Pharmacol. 1989, 96 (4): 817-822.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Zeman RJ, Ludemann R, Easton TG, Etlinger JD: Slow to fast alterations in skeletal muscle fibers caused by clenbuterol, a beta 2-receptor agonist. Am J Physiol. 1988, 254 (6 Pt 1): E726-732.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Zeman RJ, Ludemann R, Etlinger JD: Clenbuterol, a beta 2-agonist, retards atrophy in denervated muscles. Am J Physiol. 1987, 252 (1 Pt 1): E152-155.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Agbenyega ET, Morton RH, Hatton PA, Wareham AC: Effect of the beta 2-adrenergic agonist clenbuterol on the growth of fast- and slow-twitch skeletal muscle of the dystrophic (C57BL6J dy2J/dy2J) mouse. Comp Biochem Physiol C Pharmacol Toxicol Endocrinol. 1995, 111 (3): 397-403.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Agbenyega ET, Wareham AC: Effect of clenbuterol on skeletal muscle atrophy in mice induced by the glucocorticoid dexamethasone. Comp Biochem Physiol Comp Physiol. 1992, 102 (1): 141-145. 10.1016/0300-9629(92)90026-M.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Miura S, Kawanaka K, Kai Y, Tamura M, Goto M, Shiuchi T, Minokoshi Y, Ezaki O: An increase in murine skeletal muscle peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator-1alpha (PGC-1alpha) mRNA in response to exercise is mediated by beta-adrenergic receptor activation. Endocrinology. 2007, 148 (7): 3441-3448. 10.1210/en.2006-1646.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Nevzorova VA, Konovalova EN, Khomenko AV, Plekhova NG, Pazych SA: [Cytological and biochemical indices of induced sputum in patients with bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive bronchitis]. Tsitologiia. 2002, 44 (12): 1212-1219.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Deshaies Y, Willemot J, Leblanc J: Protein synthesis, amino acid uptake, and pools during isoproterenol-induced hypertrophy of the rat heart and tibialis muscle. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1981, 59 (2): 113-121.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Oishi Y, Imoto K, Ogata T, Taniguchi K, Matsumoto H, Roy RR: Clenbuterol induces expression of multiple myosin heavy chain isoforms in rat soleus fibres. Acta Physiol Scand. 2002, 176 (4): 311-318. 10.1046/j.1365-201X.2002.01036.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Grant AL, Skjaerlund DM, Helferich WG, Bergen WG, Merkel RA: Skeletal muscle growth and expression of skeletal muscle alpha-actin mRNA and insulin-like growth factor I mRNA in pigs during feeding and withdrawal of ractopamine. J Anim Sci. 1993, 71 (12): 3319-3326.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Delday MI, Maltin CA: Clenbuterol increases the expression of myogenin but not myoD in immobilized rat muscles. Am J Physiol. 1997, 272 (5 Pt 1): E941-944.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Navegantes LC, Resano NM, Migliorini RH, Kettelhut IC: Role of adrenoceptors and cAMP on the catecholamine-induced inhibition of proteolysis in rat skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2000, 279 (3): E663-668.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. McDaneld TG, Spurlock DM: Ankyrin repeat and suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) box-containing protein (ASB) 15 alters differentiation of mouse C2C12 myoblasts and phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase and Akt. J Anim Sci. 2008, 86 (11): 2897-2902. 10.2527/jas.2008-1076.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. McDaneld TG, Moody DE: Characterization of a bovine gene encoding an ankyrin repeat and SOCS box protein (ASB15). Anim Genet. 2003, 34 (3): 235-236. 10.1046/j.1365-2052.2003.01004.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. McDaneld TG, Hannon K, Moody DE: Ankyrin repeat and SOCS box protein 15 regulates protein synthesis in skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2006, 290 (6): R1672-1682.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. McDaneld TG, Hancock DL, Moody DE: Altered mRNA abundance of ASB15 and four other genes in skeletal muscle following administration of beta-adrenergic receptor agonists. Physiol Genomics. 2004, 16 (2): 275-283.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Sneddon AA, Delday MI, Steven J, Maltin CA: Elevated IGF-II mRNA and phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 and p70(S6k) in muscle showing clenbuterol-induced anabolism. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2001, 281 (4): E676-682.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Yamamoto N, Akiyama S, Katagiri T, Namiki M, Kurokawa T, Suda T: Smad1 and smad5 act downstream of intracellular signalings of BMP-2 that inhibits myogenic differentiation and induces osteoblast differentiation in C2C12 myoblasts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997, 238 (2): 574-580. 10.1006/bbrc.1997.7325.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Nakashima A, Katagiri T, Tamura M: Cross-talk between Wnt and bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) signaling in differentiation pathway of C2C12 myoblasts. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280 (45): 37660-37668. 10.1074/jbc.M504612200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Wu AL, Kim JH, Zhang C, Unterman TG, Chen J: Forkhead box protein O1 negatively regulates skeletal myocyte differentiation through degradation of mammalian target of rapamycin pathway components. Endocrinology. 2008, 149 (3): 1407-1414. 10.1210/en.2007-1470.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Kitamura T, Kitamura YI, Funahashi Y, Shawber CJ, Castrillon DH, Kollipara R, DePinho RA, Kitajewski J, Accili D: A Foxo/Notch pathway controls myogenic differentiation and fiber type specification. J Clin Invest. 2007, 117 (9): 2477-2485. 10.1172/JCI32054.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. McFarlane C, Plummer E, Thomas M, Hennebry A, Ashby M, Ling N, Smith H, Sharma M, Kambadur R: Myostatin induces cachexia by activating the ubiquitin proteolytic system through an NF-kappaB-independent, FoxO1-dependent mechanism. J Cell Physiol. 2006, 209 (2): 501-514. 10.1002/jcp.20757.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Allen DL, Unterman TG: Regulation of myostatin expression and myoblast differentiation by FoxO and SMAD transcription factors. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2007, 292 (1): C188-199. 10.1152/ajpcell.00542.2005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Sartori R, Milan G, Patron M, Mammucari C, Blaauw B, Abraham R, Sandri M: Smad2 and 3 transcription factors control muscle mass in adulthood. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2009, 296 (6): C1248-1257. 10.1152/ajpcell.00104.2009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Li ZB, Kollias HD, Wagner KR: Myostatin directly regulates skeletal muscle fibrosis. J Biol Chem. 2008, 283 (28): 19371-19378. 10.1074/jbc.M802585200.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Sundal S, Sharma S: Ultrastructural findings for the mitochondrial subpopulation of mice skeletal muscle after adrenergic stimulation by clenbuterol. J Physiol Sci. 2007, 57 (1): 7-14. 10.2170/physiolsci.RP007106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Mahoney DJ, Parise G, Melov S, Safdar A, Tarnopolsky MA: Analysis of global mRNA expression in human skeletal muscle during recovery from endurance exercise. Faseb J. 2005, 19 (11): 1498-1500.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Drijfhout WJ, Linde van der AG, Kooi SE, Grol CJ, Westerink BH: Norepinephrine release in the rat pineal gland: the input from the biological clock measured by in vivo microdialysis. J Neurochem. 1996, 66 (2): 748-755.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Takekida S, Yan L, Maywood ES, Hastings MH, Okamura H: Differential adrenergic regulation of the circadian expression of the clock genes Period1 and Period2 in the rat pineal gland. Eur J Neurosci. 2000, 12 (12): 4557-4561. 10.1046/j.0953-816X.2000.01324.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Terazono H, Mutoh T, Yamaguchi S, Kobayashi M, Akiyama M, Udo R, Ohdo S, Okamura H, Shibata S: Adrenergic regulation of clock gene expression in mouse liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100 (11): 6795-6800. 10.1073/pnas.0936797100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Takata M, Burioka N, Ohdo S, Fukuoka Y, Miyata M, Endo M, Suyama H, Shimizu E: Beta2-adrenoceptor agonists induce the mammalian clock gene, hPer1, mRNA in cultured human bronchial epithelium cells in vitro. Chronobiol Int. 2005, 22 (4): 777-783. 10.1080/07420520500179167.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Burioka N, Fukuoka Y, Takata M, Endo M, Miyata M, Chikumi H, Tomita K, Kodani M, Touge H, Takeda K, et al: Circadian rhythms in the CNS and peripheral clock disorders: function of clock genes: influence of medication for bronchial asthma on circadian gene. J Pharmacol Sci. 2007, 103 (2): 144-149. 10.1254/jphs.FMJ06003X4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. McCarthy JJ, Andrews JL, McDearmon EL, Campbell KS, Barber BK, Miller BH, Walker JR, Hogenesch JB, Takahashi JS, Esser KA: Identification of the circadian transcriptome in adult mouse skeletal muscle. Physiol Genomics. 2007, 31 (1): 86-95. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00066.2007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Simonneaux V, Poirel VJ, Garidou ML, Nguyen D, Diaz-Rodriguez E, Pevet P: Daily rhythm and regulation of clock gene expression in the rat pineal gland. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2004, 120 (2): 164-172. 10.1016/j.molbrainres.2003.10.019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Zambon AC, McDearmon EL, Salomonis N, Vranizan KM, Johansen KL, Adey D, Takahashi JS, Schambelan M, Conklin BR: Time- and exercise-dependent gene regulation in human skeletal muscle. Genome Biol. 2003, 4 (10): R61-10.1186/gb-2003-4-10-r61.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Feneberg R, Lemmer B: Circadian rhythm of glucose uptake in cultures of skeletal muscle cells and adipocytes in Wistar-Kyoto, Wistar, Goto-Kakizaki, and spontaneously hypertensive rats. Chronobiol Int. 2004, 21 (4-5): 521-538. 10.1081/CBI-200026958.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Vieira E, Nilsson EC, Nerstedt A, Ormestad M, Long YC, Garcia-Roves P, Zierath JR, Mahlapuu M: Relationship between Ampk and the Transcriptional Balance of Clock-Related Genes in Skeletal Muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2008, 295 (5): E1032-1037. 10.1152/ajpendo.90510.2008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Narkar VA, Downes M, Yu RT, Embler E, Wang YX, Banayo E, Mihaylova MM, Nelson MC, Zou Y, Juguilon H, et al: AMPK and PPARdelta agonists are exercise mimetics. Cell. 2008, 134 (3): 405-415. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.051.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Cao W, Medvedev AV, Daniel KW, Collins S: beta-Adrenergic activation of p38 MAP kinase in adipocytes: cAMP induction of the uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) gene requires p38 MAP kinase. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276 (29): 27077-27082. 10.1074/jbc.M101049200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Davies KJ, Quintanilha AT, Brooks GA, Packer L: Free radicals and tissue damage produced by exercise. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1982, 107 (4): 1198-1205. 10.1016/S0006-291X(82)80124-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. McArdle F, Pattwell DM, Vasilaki A, McArdle A, Jackson MJ: Intracellular generation of reactive oxygen species by contracting skeletal muscle cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 2005, 39 (5): 651-657. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2005.04.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Dillard CJ, Litov RE, Savin WM, Dumelin EE, Tappel AL: Effects of exercise, vitamin E, and ozone on pulmonary function and lipid peroxidation. J Appl Physiol. 1978, 45 (6): 927-932.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Dokken BB, Saengsirisuwan V, Kim JS, Teachey MK, Henriksen EJ: Oxidative stress-induced insulin resistance in rat skeletal muscle: role of glycogen synthase kinase-3. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2008, 294 (3): E615-621. 10.1152/ajpendo.00578.2007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Stangel M, Zettl UK, Mix E, Zielasek J, Toyka KV, Hartung HP, Gold R: H2O2 and nitric oxide-mediated oxidative stress induce apoptosis in rat skeletal muscle myoblasts. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1996, 55 (1): 36-43. 10.1097/00005072-199601000-00004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Christensen NJ, Galbo H: Sympathetic nervous activity during exercise. Annu Rev Physiol. 1983, 45: 139-153. 10.1146/annurev.ph.45.030183.001035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Cluberton LJ, McGee SL, Murphy RM, Hargreaves M: Effect of carbohydrate ingestion on exercise-induced alterations in metabolic gene expression. J Appl Physiol. 2005, 99 (4): 1359-1363. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00197.2005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Nagase I, Yoshida T, Saito M: Up-regulation of uncoupling proteins by beta-adrenergic stimulation in L6 myotubes. FEBS Lett. 2001, 494 (3): 175-180. 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02341-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Boss O, Bachman E, Vidal-Puig A, Zhang CY, Peroni O, Lowell BB: Role of the beta(3)-adrenergic receptor and/or a putative beta(4)-adrenergic receptor on the expression of uncoupling proteins and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator-1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999, 261 (3): 870-876. 10.1006/bbrc.1999.1145.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Flandin P, Donati Y, Barazzone-Argiroffo C, Muzzin P: Hyperoxia-mediated oxidative stress increases expression of UCP3 mRNA and protein in skeletal muscle. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579 (16): 3411-3415. 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.04.084.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Arsenijevic D, Onuma H, Pecqueur C, Raimbault S, Manning BS, Miroux B, Couplan E, Alves-Guerra MC, Goubern M, Surwit R, et al: Disruption of the uncoupling protein-2 gene in mice reveals a role in immunity and reactive oxygen species production. Nat Genet. 2000, 26 (4): 435-439. 10.1038/82565.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Bian K, Harari Y, Zhong M, Lai M, Castro G, Weisbrodt N, Murad F: Down-regulation of inducible nitric-oxide synthase (NOS-2) during parasite-induced gut inflammation: a path to identify a selective NOS-2 inhibitor. Mol Pharmacol. 2001, 59 (4): 939-947.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Dressel U, Allen TL, Pippal JB, Rohde PR, Lau P, Muscat GE: The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor beta/delta agonist, GW50 regulates the expression of genes involved in lipid catabolism and energy uncoupling in skeletal muscle cells. Mol Endocrinol. 1516, 17 (12): 2477-2493. 10.1210/me.2003-0151.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Yang X, Downes M, Yu RT, Bookout AL, He W, Straume M, Mangelsdorf DJ, Evans RM: Nuclear receptor expression links the circadian clock to metabolism. Cell. 2006, 126 (4): 801-810. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.050.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Laemmli UK: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970, 227 (5259): 680-685. 10.1038/227680a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement