Skip to main content

Pyrosequencing-based comparative genome analysis of the nosocomial pathogen Enterococcus faecium and identification of a large transferable pathogenicity island



The Gram-positive bacterium Enterococcus faecium is an important cause of nosocomial infections in immunocompromized patients.


We present a pyrosequencing-based comparative genome analysis of seven E. faecium strains that were isolated from various sources. In the genomes of clinical isolates several antibiotic resistance genes were identified, including the vanA transposon that confers resistance to vancomycin in two strains. A functional comparison between E. faecium and the related opportunistic pathogen E. faecalis based on differences in the presence of protein families, revealed divergence in plant carbohydrate metabolic pathways and oxidative stress defense mechanisms. The E. faecium pan-genome was estimated to be essentially unlimited in size, indicating that E. faecium can efficiently acquire and incorporate exogenous DNA in its gene pool. One of the most prominent sources of genomic diversity consists of bacteriophages that have integrated in the genome. The CRISPR-Cas system, which contributes to immunity against bacteriophage infection in prokaryotes, is not present in the sequenced strains. Three sequenced isolates carry the esp gene, which is involved in urinary tract infections and biofilm formation. The esp gene is located on a large pathogenicity island (PAI), which is between 64 and 104 kb in size. Conjugation experiments showed that the entire esp PAI can be transferred horizontally and inserts in a site-specific manner.


Genes involved in environmental persistence, colonization and virulence can easily be aquired by E. faecium. This will make the development of successful treatment strategies targeted against this organism a challenge for years to come.


Enterococci are Gram-positive commensals of the gastrointestinal tract of humans and other mammals. Currently, more than 30 species in the genus Enterococcus have been described [1]. The two most studied enterococcal species are E. faecium and E. faecalis, which are genetically distinct as shown by their 16S rRNA sequences and the sequences of the housekeeping gene atpA[2]. Both E. faecium and E. faecalis are an important cause of infections in hospitalized, immunocompromized patients [3]. Historically, E. faecalis has caused 90% of all enterococcal infections, but since the late 1980s a rapid increase in nosocomial E. faecium infections has occurred [4, 5]. This expansion of E. faecium in the hospital environment coincided with the swift acquisition of multiple resistance mechanisms against many antibiotics. Resistance to ampicillin and vancomycin are probably the most significant resistance traits that have been acquired by E. faecium since the 1980s and nowadays the majority of E. faecium clinical isolates are resistant to these antibiotics. In contrast with E. faecium, resistance to ampicillin and vancomycin in E. faecalis is still a relatively rare trait [6, 7]. Treatment of infections caused by antibiotic-resistant E. faecium is currently a clinical challenge and the few remaining therapeutic options are jeopardized by the emergence of resistance to new classes of antibiotics [8, 9]. Therefore antibiotic-resistant E. faecium, together with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, is currently seen as one of the gravest threats to successful therapy presented by Gram-positive bacteria [10].

Several studies have shown that the E. faecium strains that cause infections in hospitalized patients are different from the strains that colonize the gastro-intestinal tract of the healthy human host [1113]. Population biology-based studies using multilocus sequence typing (MLST) suggested that the large majority of strains isolated from nosocomial infections belong to a distinct genetic lineage termed Clonal Complex 17 (CC17) [14, 15]. In a previous study, in which comparative genome hybridization was used to assay diversity in E. faecium, more than 100 genes were found to be enriched in E. faecium CC17 isolates. Insertion sequence (IS) elements were the most prominent group of genes enriched in CC17 but, in addition, genes with a proven or proposed role in E. faecium virulence were also specifically identified in CC17 isolates [11].

Only two genes in E. faecium have been experimentally verified to contribute to virulence in animal models. These are the large surface protein Esp, which has a role in biofilm formation and urinary tract infection [16, 17] and the MSCRAMM (Microbial Surface Components Recognizing Adhesive Matrix Molecules) Acm, which is an adhesin of collagen and contributes to endocarditis [18, 19]. The hyl gene, which was proposed to encode a protein functioning as a hyaluronidase, is primarily found in clinical isolates and is much less common in E. faecium strains from other sources [20]. Although a hyl deletion mutant has not been described, the conjugative transfer of a plasmid containing the hyl gene made the transconjugant more virulent in a mouse peritonitis model, suggesting a role for the hyl gene in virulence [21]. In addition, binding to extra-cellular matrix components of a number of other surface proteins has also been shown experimentally and these proteins may contribute to virulence of E. faecium by acting as adhesins [2224]. However, animal experiments of deletion mutants in the genes encoding these proteins need to be performed to further characterize the role (if any) of these proteins in E. faecium pathogenesis. The acquisition of genes conferring an infectious phenotype to E. faecium is thought to be a recent phenomenon, and coincides with the global emergence of E. faecium as a nosocomial pathogen since the late 1980s [15].

Molecular studies into the biology of E. faecium have so far been hampered by the poor genetic accessibility of this organism. Additionally, there has long been a marked lack of genome sequence information for E. faecium and consequently there exists a need for a multi-strain genomic analysis of E. faecium with the aim to describe its fundamental biology and to determine the causes of its emergence as a nosocomial pathogen.

In recent years, alternatives to Sanger-based genome shot-gun sequencing have been developed. These 'next-generation' sequencing technologies are characterized by dramatically higher throughputs and lower costs for sequencing than Sanger-based sequencing methodologies. Pyrosequencing, which is also known as 454 sequencing in reference to the company 454 Life Sciences (Branford, CT, USA) that markets pyrosequencing platforms, currently appears to be the most widely used next-generation sequencing method for de novo microbial genome sequencing [25]. While next-generation genome sequencing methods can be used to rapidly sequence a genome to completion in cases when no or very few repetitive elements are present [26], a more typical outcome is a draft genome assembly consisting of relatively large contigs which essentially cover the entire genome, but where gaps are caused by repetitive elements that are allocated to, generally small, separate contigs [27]. Pyrosequencing-based genome analyses of several micro-organisms of medical importance have recently been performed and have demonstrated the contribution of genomic islands for the development of pathogenicity and the large genetic diversity that can be contained within a single bacterial species [2729].

In this study we use pyrosequencing-based genome sequencing of seven E. faecium strains to quantify the genomic diversity and determine core- and pan-genome size and to identify genomic differences between E. faecium and E. faecalis. The genome analysis of E. faecium also led to the identification of a large pathogenicity island that is associated with the esp gene. This study will provide a starting point for genome-wide studies to develop targeted strategies against this emerging nosocomial pathogen.


Genome sequencing of seven E. faecium isolates

Four of the sequenced strains (E1162, E1636, E1679, and U0317) originated from human infections and consequently are referred to collectively as infectious isolates in this study. Strains E980 and E1039 were isolated from the faeces of healthy human volunteers. Strain E1071 was isolated as part of a hospital surveillance program in a Dutch hospital. This surveillance program was instigated because of an ongoing outbreak of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in the hospitalized patients. E1071 was isolated from a patient not suffering from an enterococcal infection and subsequent typing of the isolate showed that it was different from the strain causing the outbreak.

Prior to genome sequencing, MLST was used to determine the sequence type (ST) of the selected isolates. MLST is currently widely used for population studies of E. faecium and is based on DNA sequence analysis of seven housekeeping genes [30]. MLST of the seven selected isolates showed that they all had different STs and represented a sufficiently diverse sample of the species E. faecium. Two of the sequenced strains (E1162 and U0317) were assigned to CC17. The sequenced strains were chosen to cover a large period of time, with the most ancient strain being from the year 1961 (E1636) and the most recent from 2005 (U0317). The relevant characteristics of the sequenced isolates are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Origins of the strains of which the genomes were sequenced.

The genomes of the seven selected E. faecium strains were sequenced using pyrosequencing technology [27] on the GS-FLX platform. The E. faecium genome sequence data obtained in this project are summarized in Table 2. Lander-Waterman statistics [31] estimate that more than 99.9% of each genome was sequenced. The genome sequences revealed roughly identical %G+C content, average gene size and %protein coding DNA for all strains. The quality of the generated sequences was evaluated using the Phred-like quality scores that are linked to these reads. Only between 0.027% and 0.196% of bases had quality scores lower than 20, which represents a small chance (1 in 100) for a mis-called base [27]. Thus, we conclude that these draft genome sequences are of good quality and can be used for further analyses. There is considerable variation in the number of assembled bases between the seven genomes, suggesting large differences in the size of the chromosome between strains and/or the variable presence of large plasmids. To determine the presence of large plasmids in the seven isolates of which the genome was sequenced we performed pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) with S1 nuclease digestion of whole genomic DNA (Additional file 1). This revealed that in all isolates plasmids with sizes >50 kb are present. Four of the sequenced strains (E980, E1636, E1679 and U0317) have mega-plasmids that range in size between 200 and 240 kb. The variable presence of large plasmids between the isolates is therefore an important cause of the variation in number of assembled bases that was observed in these genome projects.

Table 2 General features of the E. faecium genomes.

Functional categorization by COG (Cluster of Orthologous Groups [32]) classification of the predicted proteome of the sequenced strains (Additional files 2 and 3) revealed a largely identical functional repertoire in the seven sequenced strains with the largest variance between strains in the percentage of proteins assigned to COG functional category L (replication, recombination and repair).

Identification of antibiotic resistance determinants in the sequenced isolates

We determined antibiotic resistance profiles of the sequenced isolates by broth microdilution and linked the observed resistances to the presence of resistance genes (Additional file 4). These data show that strains that have been isolated recently from hospitals (either from patients that were colonized by E. faecium or suffered from E. faecium infections) are multi-resistant, while the human commensal strains E980 and E1039 have not acquired broad resistance to antibiotics. Practically all observed antibiotic resistant phenotypes could be linked to the presence of one or more different antibiotic resistance genes, most of which appear to reside on plasmids as can be concluded from the presence of plasmid replication or toxin/anti-toxin genes for plasmid maintenance on the same contigs as the antibiotic resistance genes. Two strains (E1071 and E1679) were found to be resistant to vancomycin. Both these strains carry the vanA transposon. In strain E1071 the vanA transposon is of the A2 type [33], in which a copy of an IS1216V-IS3 like element has inserted at the left end of the vanA transposon, which results in the deletion of the first 120 bp as compared to the archetypal Tn1546 vancomycin resistance element described by Arthur et al. [34]. In addition, a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) was identified in the vanX gene at position 8234 (G→T) of the vanA transposon, resulting in the substitution of a lysine to an asparagine in VanX. In strain E1679 the vanA transposon is essentially identical to the Tn1546 element [34] with only a single SNP (G→A) occuring at position 5663 resulting in the substitution of an alanine by a threonine in the VanS protein.

In addition, strains E1162, E1679 and U0317 are high-level resistant (minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) >200 μg/ml) to ampicillin and have point mutations that are known to confer resistance to this antibiotic [35] in the pbp5 gene. Strain E1636, which is low-level resistant to ampicillin (MIC = 25 μg/ml), does not have these mutations. Presumably, other mechanisms, such as an elevated expression of pbp5[36] could play a role here. The two strains (E1679 and U0317) that are resistant to ciprofloxacin both carry point mutations in the gyrA and parC genes, which have previously been described to be associated with resistance to ciprofloxacin [37].

On the basis of MLST, the multi-drug resistant strain E1071 groups with isolates from piggeries and healthy humans in a clonal complex that is generally not linked to human infections [15, 38, 39]. Genome analysis of E1071 suggests a possible pig origin of this strain on the basis of two observations. Firstly, E1071 was found to contain the tcr gene cluster, which confers resistance to copper [40]. Another putative copper detoxification system (EfmE1071_1339 to EfmE1071_1341) was also identified in E1071. This finding suggests a porcine origin of E1071 as resistance to copper in E. faecium is selected for in pigs because this metal is used as a growth-promoting feed supplement [41]. Secondly, the base pair found at position 8234 of the vanA transposon also suggests a porcine origin of E1071. The observed nucleotide T at position 8234 is associated with porcine isolates while a G at this position would indicate a strain originating from poultry [42]. Strain E1071 may therefore be representative of E. faecium strains that can be easily transferred between pigs and humans and may therefore shuttle antibiotic resistance genes between these niches.

COG-based functional comparison between E. faecium and E. faecalis

A more detailed COG-based functional comparison between E. faecium and E. faecalis was performed to identify characteristics that distinguish these two species. A total of 70 COGs (Additional file 5) were present in all of the E. faecium genomes sequenced in this study, while being absent in six publicly available E. faecalis genome sequences. The reverse analysis, in which COGs were identified that are present in all E. faecalis genomes and absent from E. faecium, showed that 140 COGs are specific for E. faecalis (Additional file 6).

The COG-based comparison of E. faecium and E. faecalis revealed important differences between both organisms in sugar metabolism, particularly of the pentose sugar arabinose. The ability to use arabinose by E. faecium can be used to distinguish E. faecium from E. faecalis[43] but further characterization of the metabolism of this sugar in E. faecium has not been performed. In other lactic acid bacteria [44], the isomerization of arabinose to ribulose is the first step in the metabolism of this sugar. This reaction is predicted to be catalyzed by the E. faecium protein belonging to COG2160, which is not present in E. faecalis. Subsequently ribulose can be phosphorylated, after which the resulting intermediate ribulose-5-phosphate is further metabolized through the phosphoketolase pathway in which phosphoketolase (COG3957) is responsible for the crucial conversion of xylulose-5-phosphate to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate (GAP) and acetyl-phosphate [44]. GAP is then further used as a substrate in the Embden-Meyerhof pathway. In E. faecalis proteins belonging to both COG2160 and COG3957 are absent and this probably explains the inability of E. faecalis to ferment arabinose. E. faecium also has COGs dedicated to the uptake of arabinose (COG4213, COG4214) and the degradation of arabinose-containing oligo-saccharides (COG3940), all of which are absent from E. faecalis.

The presence of COGs in E. faecium that are specifically involved in the metabolism of arabinose suggests that E. faecium has adapted its metabolism to include plant polysaccharides or their degradation products as energy sources since arabinose occurs abundantly in nature as subunits of hemicellulose. The ability of E. faecium to utilize carbon sources from plant origin is also exemplified by the presence in all E. faecium strains of proteins belonging to COG5424, which is predicted to be involved in the metabolism of pectin or its degradation products, and to COG3479, which is likely to be involved in the breakdown of coumaric acid and other components of lignocellulose as has been shown for a similar protein (81% amino acid identity to the E. faecium ortholog) in Lactobacillus plantarum[45]. Again, none of these COGs are present in E. faecalis. In contrast, a number of COGs that are unique to E. faecalis are linked to its previously described ability to use ethanolamine as a carbon source during anaerobic growth in the presence of cobalamin [46]. Ethanolamine is a common head group of phospholipids and is therefore abundantly present in the gut as part of the host's diet.

Another metabolic difference between E. faecium and E. faecalis was predicted in the first step of gluconeogenesis from pyruvate, i.e. the conversion of pyruvate into phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP). In E. faecium, pyruvate can be converted by pyruvate carboxylase to oxaloacetate and subsequently PEP is formed from oxaloacetate by the action of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (COG1866). In E. faecalis, the latter enzyme is not present and PEP is formed directly from pyruvate by the enzyme pyruvate phosphate dikinase (COG0574).

The COG-based comparison of E. faecium and E. faecalis also revealed differences in proteins involved in the protection against oxidative stress. In contrast to E. faecalis[47], E. faecium does not have the enzyme catalase, but it has other mechanisms putatively targeted at oxygen detoxification. One of these mechanisms is a peroxiredoxin and a corresponding reductase (COG3634). While E. faecalis also has proteins with a similar function (EF2738-EF2739 in the V583 genome [48]), the E. faecium proteins are not orthologous to these E. faecalis proteins, but instead are related to a similar and biochemically characterized system in Thermus aquaticus with 81% and 61% amino acid identity for the peroxiredoxin and its reductase, respectively [49]. Another possible defense mechanism to oxidative stress is provided by glutathione (γ-GluCysGly; GSH), which can be synthesized by both E. faecium and E. faecalis[50]. The reduced form of glutathione, together with the enzyme gluthatione peroxidase, can detoxify reactive oxygen species, resulting in the formation of GSSG [51]. E. faecium has a glutathione peroxidase (COG0386), but E. faecalis does not have this particular enzyme, suggesting that in E. faecium glutathione may play a more prominent role in the oxidative stress response than in E. faecalis. In contrast to E. faecium, E. faecalis is capable to respire aerobically in the presence of heme due to a cytochrome bd-type respiratory oxidase (COG1271 and COG1294; [52]), which leads to the production of substantial amounts of reactive oxygen species [53]. This particular selective pressure may have led to divergent evolution of the oxidative stress response in E. faecium and E. faecalis.

Phylogenomic and diversity analysis of the E. faecium genome

Phylogenomic trees for the seven E. faecium isolates were constructed based on concatenated alignments of 649 orthologous proteins in the genomes (Fig. 1A) and based on the overall gene content of the genomes (Fig. 1B). Fig. 1A is a maximum likelihood tree based on mutations in conserved proteins among the seven sequenced isolates and is therefore indicative of the evolutionary distance between the sequenced strains. Fig. 1B is a neighbor joining tree with shared gene content as distance measure (Additional file 7) and represents the differences between the strains caused by gene gain and loss. Both analyses resulted in phylogenomic trees of nearly congruent topology and demonstrate that strain E980 is evolutionary distinct from the other six sequenced isolates, which are more closely related to each other. While the evolutionary distance between these six isolates (as compared to E980) is relatively small, there are considerable differences in gene content between strains. This observation indicates that gene gain and loss, rather than evolutionary descent, appears to be the most important driving force in determining fitness of a given E. faecium strain in a specific environment. There is no evidence for a recent common ancestor of strains which have been isolated from an infection (E1162, E1636, E1679, and U0317). However, the two strains from CC17 (E1162 and U0317) appear to share a more recent common evolutionary history compared to the other isolates. While E1162 and U0317 appear to be relatively closely related to each other based on the alignment of orthologous proteins, there is a remarkably large difference (11.7%) in gene content between these two strains.

Figure 1

Phylogenomic analysis of E. faecium. Panel (A): Unrooted maximum likelihood tree of E. faecium based on the concatenated alignments of 649 orthologous proteins (containing 11639 residues). Bootstrap values are based on 1000 permutations. Panel (B): Unrooted neighbour-joining tree depicting differences in gene content in E. faecium. The distance matrix used to generate this phylogenomic tree is provided as Additional file 7.

To further quantify the intra-species diversity of E. faecium, the coding sequences (CDS) predicted from the seven genomes were compared by a highly sensitive all-vs-all sequence alignment. Subsequently, the new gene discovery rate was estimated by fitting a least squares power law (Fnew(n) = κnewn-α) to the median number of new genes calculated for all strain combinations (Fig. 2A). The value for the exponent αdetermines whether the pan-genome can be considered to be essentially unlimited in size ("open"; α ≤ 1) or to have a finite size ("closed"; α > 1) [54]. In the case of E. faecium, the estimated value for α is 0.88 ± 0.02 signifying an open pan-genome and a high genomic diversity between E. faecium strains. To estimate the total size of the gene pool available to E. faecium (i.e., the E. faecium pan-genome), an analysis was performed using the same all-vs-all sequence alignment in which both genes that were shared and genes that are strain specific were counted. A least squares power law (Fpan(n) = κpannγ) was fit to the medians and the resulting γ value of 0.17, being > 0, is again indicative of an open pan-genome [54] and confirms that new E. faecium genes will continue to be identified as more genomes are sequenced.

Figure 2

Analysis of E. faecium genome diversity. Estimates of new gene discovery rate (panel A), total E. faecium gene pool (pan-genome) (panel B) and core-genome size (panel C) are shown for increasing values of the number n of E. faecium genomes sequenced. Colored circles represent the number of new or core genes present when a particular genome is added to the subset of the remaining genomes. Grey circles represent the total gene repertoire for a random collection of organisms. Medians of the distributions are indicated by red diamonds. The curve for the estimation of the gene discovery rate is a least squares fit of the power law Fnew(n) = κnew n-αto medians. The curve for the estimation of the size of the E. faecium pan-genome is a least squares power law (Fpan(n) = κpan nγ) fit to the medians. The size of the core genome was estimated by fitting the exponential curve Fcore(n) = κcore exp[-ncore] + tgcore(θ) to medians.

The size of the core genome was estimated by fitting an exponential curve to the median number of CDS conserved across all the genomes calculated for all strain combinations (Fig. 2B). The core genome size of E. faecium was estimated to be 2172 ± 20 CDS. This value shows that a sizeable fraction of the E. faecium genome is accessory. In E1039, which has the smallest genome in our data set, 16% of the genome is non-core, while this quantity increases to 29% in U0317.

Bacteriophages in E. faecium

Analysis of the accessory genome of the E. faecium strains revealed that phage and phage-like sequences contribute significantly to the genomic diversity in E. faecium (Table 3). CDS of predicted phage origins make up between 2.3% (E1071) and 5.1% (E980) of the total number of CDS of the genome. In all isolates a significant fraction of these CDS are strain-specific, indicating the unique nature of the phage elements that are present in each genome. No CDS of phage origin were found to be specifically associated with infectious isolates. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) consist of short, conserved repeats interspaced by variable sequences and provide immunity against foreign genetic elements. CRISPRs have been identified in approximately 40% of sequenced eubacterial genomes and are associated with cas genes that are essential for the antiviral function of CRISPRs [55]. In three of the sequenced strains (E1071, E1679 and U0317) CRISPR-loci could be identified but in all strains the CRISPR locus is located inside a gene. The protein that is encoded by this gene is homologous to plasmid replication initiator proteins in other lactic acid bacteria. It seems unlikely that the gene's internal repeat sequences act as genuine CRISPRs. In addition, none of the sequenced E. faecium strains contain a homolog of the cas1 gene (COG1518), which is a universal marker for CRISPR-associated genes [55, 56]. Thus, there is no evidence to suggest that a functional CRISPR-Cas system is present in the sequenced E. faecium strains and this may explain their diversity in prophage sequences. The fully sequenced E. faecalis V583 strain also does not contain the CRISPR-Cas system and its genome contains a number of prophage elements. These findings are in contrast to E. faecalis strain OG1RF [57], which has a CRISPR-locus and associated cas genes. Interestingly, the E. faecalis OG1RF genome does not contain prophage sequences [57].

Table 3 CDS of bacteriophage origin in the sequenced genomes

In five of the seven sequenced E. faecium strains phages could be activated by mitomycin through observation of phage particles by transmission electron microscopy of the culture supernatant (Fig. 3). All these phages had an isometric head with a long non-contractile segmented tail, which is characteristic of the Siphoviridae. Siphoviridae are a very common family of bacteriophages of the lactic acid bacteria [58, 59]. While head-sizes are similar (~40 nm), there is marked variation in the size of the tails, ranging from ~70 nm in the E1679 phage to ~220 nm in the E1039 phage.

Figure 3

Transmisssion electron micrographs of phage particles released by the indicated E. faecium strains upon overnight exposure of an exponentially growing culture to 1 μg/ml mitomycin. Scale bars are 50 nm.

Phage lysates were tested for their infectivity but plaque formation was not observed (data not shown). This may be explained by a defect in infectivity of the phage particles, but it may also be possible that the prophages that are integrated into the different genomes protect the host against extra phage infection [60].

Identification of potential and established virulence genes

To identify other genes potentially involved in virulence or the emergence of E. faecium as a nosocomial pathogen, the proteomes predicted to be encoded by the genomes of the strains that were isolated from human infections (E1162, E1636, E1679, and U0317) were compared to the predicted proteomes of the non-infectious isolates (E980, E1039 and E1071). This revealed that a group of 26 orthologous proteins are conserved in all infectious strains, while being absent in the non-infectious strains (Additional file 8). To estimate the relevance of this particular number of shared proteins, we performed a similar analysis to identify proteins shared between all possible four combinations of genomes, while being absent in the remaining three genomes. This analysis showed that the average number of shared proteins in a combination of four strains, while being absent in the three other strains is 3.7, with a median value of 2. The 26 shared proteins between infectious strains and absent from non-infectious strains represent the highest value for all possible combinations. Seven of the 26 proteins that occur solely in infectious isolates are IS elements of different families. These may contribute to the genomic flexibility in E. faecium and thereby facilitate the sequential acquisition of adaptive elements. In addition, an ABC transporter with unknown substrate specificity is also found to be specific for infectious isolates. Other proteins that are conserved in all infectious isolates have predicted roles in plasmid replication or have a putative function as phage type integrases/recombinases. Finally, a number of hypothetical proteins are only present in infectious isolates, two of which are predicted to be located in the cytoplasmic membrane.

The presence of the known virulence genes esp, hyl and acm in the sequenced isolates was also analyzed. The esp gene was found in strains E1162, E1679 and U0317. The hyl gene is only present in U0317. A full-length acm gene is present in E1162 and U0317. In other strains this gene is either inactivated by insertion of a transposon (E980 and E1071) or by mutations that introduce a premature stop-codon (E1039, E1636, and E1679). This finding is in line with previous research, which has shown that interrupted acm genes are common in strains not belonging to CC17 and that an intact acm gene may have contributed to the recent emergence of CC17 as a nosocomial pathogen [61].

Identification and mobilization of an E. faecium pathogenicity island

Three sequenced strains (E1162, E1679, and U0317) harbor the esp gene, which encodes an approximately 200 kDa protein that is anchored to the peptidoglycan of the cell wall through the presence of an LPxTG-type motif. In E. faecium, Esp is involved in biofilm formation and urinary tract infection in a mouse model [16, 17]. In a previous study, the esp gene was proposed to be carried on a pathogenicity island (PAI), but only 14 kb of the PAI was sequenced in a single strain and the integration site of the PAI was not resolved [62]. By using the genome sequences of the esp+ strains and after additional sequencing of PCR products that were generated to span gaps between contigs, we were able to complete the sequence of the esp containing PAI for all three strains. This revealed that esp is carried on a large PAI in E. faecium that is considerably larger than the 14 kb of sequence that was previously obtained [62] as it varies in size between 64 kb (in E1162), 104 kb (in E1679) and 68 kb (in U0317) (Fig. 4). There is some variation in the %G+C-content of the esp PAI (35.7% %G+C in E1162; 36.6% in E1679; 35.4% in U0317). This is 1.1 to 2.3% lower than the average %G+C-content over the entire genome of these strains, indicating that the DNA of the esp PAI is acquired exogenously. In E1162 and E1679 the esp PAI is flanked by an imperfect 54-bp direct repeat (Additional file 9), with the left repeat being the 3' end of the rpsI gene (which codes for the ribosomal protein S9) and the right repeat just upstream of a small gene encoding a 9 kDa protein with unknown function. In U0317 the 3' end of the PAI is inserted at the same genomic location as in the other strains and is flanked by the repeat sequence, but the 5' end has integrated downstream of the tuf gene. The rpsI gene is present in this strain, but only a small element, which is identical to the 5' part of the E1679 esp PAI, is found downstream. This suggests that the complete esp PAI in U0317 has originally inserted downstream of rpsI, but that since then a genomic rearrangement event has occurred, which finally resulted in nearly the complete esp PAI reintegrating downstream of tuf.

Figure 4

Sequence alignment of the esp PAI in E. faecium E1162, E1679 and U0317. The red-colored bands represent matching regions between the esp PAIs. A small blue band represents the inversion of a transposase fragment between E. faecium E1162 and E1679. Arrows indicate CDS and direction of transcription. The yellow arrows indicate the fragment of the esp PAI, that is identical to a fragment of the PAI of E. faecalis MMH594 [46]. The green arrows indicate the CDS that are homologous to EfaB5. The purple arrows in E1679 indicate the CDS predicted to encode the pathway of inositol metabolism. Orange arrows indicate transposases and integrases. White arrows indicate flanking genes that are not part of the esp PAI. The positions of the rpsI, tuf and esp genes are indicated.

The sequence of large parts of the esp PAI is conserved between the three strains and diversity within the esp PAI is mainly caused by the variable presence of genetic elements. The most striking insertion in the esp PAI has occurred in E1679 and consists of a 7-kb gene cluster near the 5' end of the PAI, which encodes a complete pathway for inositol metabolism. Of the seven sequenced isolates, only E1679 is capable of using inositol as a carbon source (data not shown), suggesting that the metabolic pathway encoded by this element is functional. In all strains, a 10-kb element is present in the 5' part of the PAI that is essentially completely identical (= 98% nucleotide identity) to a gene cluster (EF0093 - EF0106) in the 154-kb pathogenicity island of E. faecalis MMH594 [63]. Interestingly, this E. faecalis PAI also carries the esp gene. The presence of these regions of identical DNA in both E. faecium and E. faecalis PAIs suggests a recent transfer of genetic material between these two species or acquisition from a third source. The function of this gene cluster in both E. faecium and E. faecalis is unclear. Three CDS of the element are predicted to encode ribosomal proteins and among the other encoded proteins are a membrane protein putatively functioning as a multi-drug transporter and membrane proteins that appear to be involved in the uptake of manganese. Interestingly, manganese uptake systems have been linked to virulence in various Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria [64]. Another gene which can play a role in host-cell interactions is found on the extreme 3' end of the esp PAI. This gene encodes a 120 kDa LPxTG-type cell wall anchored protein that is 91% identical to the EcbA protein from E. faecium DO, which was shown to acts as an adhesin to the extracellular matrix components fibrinogen and collagen [24]. The 3' end of all three esp PAIs is closely related (90% nucleotide identity) to an element termed EfaB5 [65] in E. faecalis (encoded by EF1875 - EF1889 in E. faecalis V583). In its turn, the EfaB5 element is closely related to the conjugation module of Tn916.

Previously, the esp gene was shown to be transferable by conjugation between two E. faecium isolates [66] but no further analysis of the transfer of the esp gene was performed in this study. Our observation that esp is located on a PAI led us to reinvestigate the mobilization of esp, to assess if the esp PAI is completely or partially transferred and if the esp PAI inserts in a site-specific manner. We performed filter mating experiments with E. faecium E1162Δesp (a derivative of E1162 with a chloramphenicol resistance cassette inserted in the esp gene [16]) as donor strain and BM4105RF as recipient. Transconjugants were picked up with a frequency of 1.6 × 10-7 per recipient cell. Insertion of the PAI in the recipient strains was confirmed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) (Fig. 5A) with subsequent Southern blotting with a probe for the non-deleted part of esp (Fig. 5B). This showed that a single fragment in the transconjugant had increased ~60 kb in size and hybridized with the esp probe, which corresponds to transfer of the complete esp PAI of E1162. To determine the insertion site of the esp PAI in the transconjugants, we also probed the blot with a PCR fragment covering the putative integration site and found an identical ~60 kb increase in size of the hybridizing band, showing that the esp PAI has inserted at the same chromosomal location (i.e. downstream of the rpsI gene) as in E1162. These data were also confirmed by performing PCRs with primers that annealed to the flanking regions of the esp PAI and the 5' and 3' ends of the esp PAI (Fig. 5C) and subsequent sequencing of the PCR products (data not shown). Our data show that the complete PAI can be transferred from an esp PAI carrying strain to an esp- strain and inserts in a site-specific manner directly downstream of the rpsI gene. Moreover, due to the use of an esp deletion mutant as donor in the conjugation experiment, we can conclude that the Esp protein is not essential for this process.

Figure 5

Transfer of the esp PAI from E. faecium E1162Δ esp to E. faecium BM4105RF. Panel (A): representative ethidium bromide stained PFGE gel of SmaI-digested chromosomal DNA of the donor strain (E1162Δesp; lane 1), the recipient strain (BM4105RF; lane 2) and a transconjugant (lane 3). The gel band that has shifted in the recipient strain due to the insertion of the esp PAI is indicated by the white arrow. Panel (B): Southern blots of the PFGE gel hybridized with a probe for esp and a probe covering the insertion site of the esp PAI. Panel (C): PCR analysis of the esp PAI insertion site in the donor strain (E1162Δesp), the recipient strain (BM4105RF) and a transconjugant (TC). PCRs were performed with primers covering the esp PAI insertion site (reactions A), covering the 5' end of the esp PAI and the 5' flanking end of the insertion site (reactions B), and covering the 3' end of the esp PAI and the 3' flanking end of the insertion site (reactions C). The marker (M) is Invitrogen's 1 Kb Plus DNA Ladder. Note that, because of the size of the esp PAI, no products can be obtained in PCRs with primers on the 5' and 3' flanking regions of the esp PAI integration site in esp+ strains.

Remarkably, in the strains E980, E1071 and E1636, which do not harbor the esp PAI, other elements have inserted in the same locus, suggesting that this is an important hot-spot for integration and recombination in E. faecium. These elements are considerably smaller than the esp PAI. In E980, a 9-kb element encodes a phosphotransferase (PTS) system and a glycoside hydrolase (family 38). In E980 a deletion of 5 genes that form the right flanking region of the esp PAI has occurred. In both E1071 and E1636, different elements (both 8 kb in size) have inserted into the putative hot spot. They encode no obvious functions, but the presence of two distinct repA-like genes indicates that these elements are integrated plasmids. In both E1071 and E1636 the inserted elements are flanked by the 54-bp direct repeat (Additional file 9).


In the last two decades E. faecium has emerged as a nosocomial pathogen in severely immunocompromized patients. Successful treatment is increasingly hampered by antibiotic resistance, and consequently, E. faecium infections are associated with considerable morbidity and high mortality [10]. To obtain a better understanding of the basic biology of E. faecium and to estimate the diversity contained within this species we sequenced the genomes of seven E. faecium strains that were isolated from different ecological niches. This is the first study which employs genome sequencing for the study of this important nosocomial pathogen.

Resistance to several antibiotics was observed in all sequenced isolates and these phenotypically observed resistances could generally be linked to the presence of previously described resistance determinants in the isolates. Isolates from clinical sites were particularly rich in antibiotic resistance genes. The association of the antibiotic resistance genes with mobile genetic elements that we observed in the seven isolates under study here is in line with previous studies [67] and suggests that E. faecium may serve as an important hub for the transfer of antibiotic resistance genes to other intestinal bacteria [68, 69].

A comparison between E. faecium and E. faecalis revealed differences in the occurence of several protein families between the two organisms. In particular, E. faecium has several metabolic pathways dedicated to the metabolism of carbohydrates of plant origin, which are absent from E. faecalis. This suggests an evolutionary adaptation to a lifestyle as a gut symbiont of herbivorous or omnivorous animals and may also enable E. faecium to survive on plant surfaces from which it can frequently be isolated [70]. The proteins tentatively involved in the protection against oxidative stress in E. faecium are very different from those in E. faecalis. The oxidative stress response of E. faecalis has been characterized in considerable detail and appears to be linked to virulence [71]. Interestingly, exogenous production of hydrogen peroxide by E. faecium has been identified as an important virulence factor in a Caenorhabditis elegans model of infection [72]. Understanding how E. faecium can protect itself from the reactive oxygen species that it produces itself or to which it is exposed to in neutrophils or macrophages during infection, may provide important insights into the process by which E. faecium can cause disease.

This study also provides novel insights into the population structure of E. faecium, which has so far been defined by MLST. Upon analysis of the MLST data using the algorithm eBURST, it has been suggested that the large majority of strains isolated from nosocomial infections group in a distinct cluster, termed CC17 [14]. However, the use of MLST in combination with the eBURST-algorithm to describe the population structure of E. faecium has been disputed as high recombination rates in E. faecium, in combination with a relatively low mutation rate, results in unreliable phylogenetic inferences by eBURST [73]. Recently, an analysis of the MLST database for E. faecium using novel and more advanced algorithms than eBURST has suggested that the STs constituting CC17 have in fact evolved independently from different ancestral clones [74]. The phylogenomic analysis presented here (Fig. 1) provides a detailed insight into the evolutionary descent of the seven sequenced strains and can be used to further refine our understanding of the evolution of E. faecium. In this study, two of the seven sequenced isolates (E1162 and U0317) have been assigned to CC17 on the basis of MLST. Our genomic data, combined with the recent insights obtained by MLST, suggest that the CC17 isolates appear to have formed a sub-population in the E. faecium species. However, it is also clear that these infectious isolates are not strictly clonally related to each other and have diversified considerably. In addition, the large differences in gene content observed here show that even in strains that are relatively closely related on the level of their core genome, the gain and/or loss of mobile genetic elements is the leading force in determining strain-specific properties.

The pan-genome analysis of E. faecium indicated that the total available gene pool within this species is essentially unlimited. This may be explained by its ability to incorporate foreign DNA into its gene pool and by the wide variety of ecological niches, such as the mammalian gastrointestinal tract and foods, that E. faecium can colonize. This allows the organism to come into contact with many pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria and sets the scene for extensive horizontal gene transfer between E. faecium and others. A consequence of the open pan-genome of E. faecium is that it can rapidly acquire genes that have the potential to increase fitness under adverse environmental conditions. This is most obvious in the accumulation of antibiotic resistance genes in clinical isolates (Additional file 4). In addition, genes that allow for infection of the immunocompromized host may also be acquired and introduced into the E. faecium gene pool, as is exemplified by the esp PAI.

Lysogenic bacteriophages have so far not been studied in E. faecium, but they make an important contribution to the genomic diversity of E. faecium. It has been hypothesized that lysogenic bacteriophages should confer some advantage to the host, because otherwise they would be lost due to competition with non-infected strains. They may also increase the environmental fitness of the lysogenic host in a process termed lysogenic conversion, which has been described to add to the virulence of several Gram-positive pathogens such as Streptococcus pyogenes and S. aureus[60]. It remains to be determined to what extent bacteriophages contribute to niche adaptation and an infectious phenotype in E. faecium, but the wide variety of phages that has been identified in this relatively small sample of strains show that they have a major role in shaping the genome of E. faecium. The absence of a functional CRISPR-Cas system in the sequenced E. faecium isolates may make these strains relatively susceptible to phage attack, resulting in a high diversity of integrated prophages. The CRISPR-Cas system has also been implicated in the spread of antibiotic resistance genes among staphylococci [75]. It is currently unknown if the CRISPR-Cas system also acts as a barrier to the acquisition of antibiotic resistance genes in enterococci.

The esp gene of E. faecium is more abundant in clinical isolates than in isolates from food or environmental origins [76, 77] and contributes to biofilm formation and urinary tract infections in an animal model [16, 17]. Here we show that esp is carried on a large pathogenicity island. Also in E. faecalis, the esp gene is harbored on a large pathogenicity island of approximately 150 kb in size. This E. faecalis PAI also carries the genes needed for the production of cytolysin, an exotoxin that contributes to E. faecalis virulence [64]. In E. faecium we have not observed a homolog of the E. faecalis cytolysin and in fact most other genes of the E. faecalis pathogenicity island as described in strain MMH594 [63] are absent in the E. faecium esp PAI. The exceptions to this rule are the esp gene itself and the 10-kb gene cluster described above, which is completely conserved between the esp PAIs of E. faecium and E. faecalis. The presence of this conserved element suggests recent horizontal transfer of these genes between E. faecium and E. faecalis or, possibly, the independent acquisition of this element by E. faecium and E. faecalis from another common source. Horizontal transfer may also explain the presence of the EfaB5 element on the 3' end of the esp PAI in E. faecium. This element is part of a larger family of conjugative and integrative elements in many Gram-positive bacteria. Exchange of specific modules in these elements appears to be a relatively common event. The esp PAI may, therefore, be the result of the serendipitous accumulation of several genetic elements in the hot spot provided by the rpsI gene in the E. faecium genome. Interestingly, also in Streptococcus agalactiae several mobile genetic elements have been found to be integrated downstream of rpsI[78], suggesting that this gene forms a hot spot for genomic diversity in different Gram-positive bacteria.

Even though the overall architecture of the esp PAI is identical in all sequenced isolates, there are also marked differences between the esp PAIs in the three different isolates described in this manuscript. These are mainly caused by the independent acquisition of other elements, such as the putative inositol metabolic pathway in strain E1679. This shows that recombination in the esp PAI is an ongoing process. Because the esp PAI is mobilizable, as demonstrated here by the conjugative transfer of the PAI between the strains E1162Δesp and BM4105RF, the esp gene and the other genes that are carried on the pathogenicity island may spread rapidly through E. faecium, thereby contributing to the ability to infect immunocompromized human hosts.


In summary, we have performed the first genome-based study of the nosocomial pathogen E. faecium. We found that the isolates originating from the hospital have acquired multiple antibiotic resistance genes and, in addition, have genes that may play a role in the colonization and infection of hospitalized patients. Genome sequencing of multiple isolates allowed us to determine a genome-based phylogeny of E. faecium and to accurately quantify the substantial genomic diversity between strains in this species. This analysis showed that the two strains belonging to CC17 in our data-set were relatively closely related on the basis of their core genome but still have a large difference in gene content, suggesting that gain and loss of mobile genetic elements, rather than evolutionary descent, is the most important driving force in determining virulence-associated properties in this clonal complex. The variable presence of lysogenic bacteriophages in the sequenced strains was found to be an important contributor to the intra-species diversity of E. faecium. We also identified characteristics that distinguish E. faecium from the related nosocomial pathogen E. faecalis, particularly in the repertoire of genes involved in sugar metabolism and the response to oxidative stress. Finally we show that three isolates have acquired a large PAI that is associated with the esp gene and we provide evidence that horizontal gene transfer between E. faecium and E. faecalis may have occurred during the evolution of this PAI.

While E. faecium currently has a lower virulence potential than other cocci with a low-%G+C content, such as S. aureus and pathogenic streptococci, its resistance to antibiotics has made it one of the most difficult-to-treat nosocomial pathogens. The genomic flexibility of E. faecium allows the efficient integration of additional fitness determinants to the E. faecium gene pool, leading to the rapid adaptation to new environmental niches such as those that are found in hospitalized patients. Genome-wide studies, which will be facilitated by the sequence data presented here, are therefore needed to increase our understanding of the basic biology of E. faecium and to identify genes that are essential for colonization and infection of hospitalized patients.


Strains, growth conditions and DNA isolation

The origins of the E. faecium strains of which the genome was sequenced are presented in Table 1. Stocks for these strains were stored at -80°C in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth with 30% glycerol. Freezer stocks were streaked on Tryptic Soy Agar supplemented with 5% sheep blood (Becton Dickinson, Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands). Single colonies were picked to inoculate 5 ml BHI. These cultures were grown for 18 hours at 37°C with shaking at 150 rpm and subsequently cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 4000 g for 10 min. Genomic DNA was isolated from the cell pellets using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification kit (Promega, Leiden, The Netherlands) according to the manufacturer's instructions. MLST was performed as previously described [30]. It should be noted that we did not separate chromosomal DNA from plasmid DNA in the DNA preparations that were submitted for sequencing as it has been reported that many important characteristics of E. faecium (such as antibiotic resistance and virulence genes) are encoded on plasmids [21, 7981]. Plasmid content of the seven isolates was determined by PFGE on S1 nuclease treated total DNA according to previously published methods [81]

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome sequence data were generated with the GS FLX system (454 Life Sciences, Branford CT). A library of single-stranded template DNA fragments was prepared from the purified genomic DNA using the GS FLX Standard DNA Library Preparation Kit (Roche, Almere, The Netherlands). The Shotgun GS FLX Standard emPCR Kit I (Roche) was used for emulsion-based clonal amplification of a single-stranded template DNA library. The GS FLX Standard LR70 Sequencing Kit (Roche) was used in combination with the GS FLX Standard PicoTiterPlate Kit (70 × 75; Roche) to determine the nucleotide sequence of the immobilized and clonally amplified DNA library. All kits were used according to the manufacturer's instructions. The obtained sequences were de novo assembled using Newbler (454 runAssembly software, version

The contig sequences of each strain were concatenated with the sequences NNNNNCACACACTTAATTAATTAAGTGTGTGNNNNN, which puts stop codons in all six reading frames, and the concatenated DNA sequences were submitted to the Annotation Service of the J. Craig Venter Institute (JCVI; Rockville MD, USA) [82], where they were run through JCVI's prokaryotic annotation pipeline. Included in the pipeline is gene finding with Glimmer [83], Blast-extend-repraze searches [84], HMM searches [8587], TMHMM searches [88], SignalP predictions [89] and automatic annotations from AutoAnnotate. The automated annotations produced by the JCVI Annotation Service were curated manually. rRNA genes in the genomes were identified using RNAmmer [90]. The whole genome sequence data described in this paper have been deposited under the following accession numbers: Enterococcus faecium E980: [Genbank:ABQA00000000]; Enterococcus faecium E1039: [Genbank:ACOS00000000]; Enterococcus faecium E1071: [Genbank:ABQI00000000];Enterococcus faecium E1162: [Genbank:ABQJ00000000]; Enterococcus faecium E1636: [Genbank:ABRY00000000]; Enterococcus faecium E1679: [Genbank:ABSC00000000]; Enterococcus faecium U0317: [Genbank:ABSW00000000].

The annotated proteins were assigned to Cluster of Orthologous Groups (COG) by performing a sensitive search using the Smith-Waterman algorithm against the COG database as described previously [91] with a cut-off of E < 0.01. For the COG-based comparison of E. faecium with E. faecalis the protein files corresponding to all the E. faecalis genome sequences (strains ATCC29200, HH22, TUSoD Ef11, TX0104, TX1332 and V583) that were available at the time of analysis were downloaded from the NCBI Genomes website and COGs were assigned as described above. CRISPR loci in the genome sequences were detected by CRISPRFinder [92]. The occurence of CRISPR-associated cas genes was determined by the presence of a protein belonging to COG1518, which serves as the universal marker of CRISPR-associated genes [38, 39]. Metabolic pathway mappings were performed using the KEGG Automatic Annotation Server [66]. The NCBI BLAST package [93] was used to compare protein and DNA sequences. DNA sequence comparisons were visualized with the Artemis Comparison Tool (ACT [94]). ACT comparison files were generated through DoubleACT [95], with a cut-off score of 1 × 10-10.

Construction of phylogenomic trees

A phylogenomic tree based on the concatenated alignment of conserved protein sequences was constructed. First, proteins were selected that fitted the following criteria: (i) proteins that could be assigned to a COG and were the only protein present in this COG, and (ii) the COGs containing a single protein should be present in all seven sequenced genomes. One COG was removed manually from this dataset because of large inter-strain variation in the protein sequences which is caused by the assignment of non-orthologous proteins to the same COG. The resulting protein sequences, belonging to 649 different COGs, were subsequently aligned using MUSCLE [96]. These alignments were concatenated after which a maximum likelihood tree was constructed using PHYML [97], including bootstrapping with 1000 iterations. The resulting tree was visualized in SplitsTree4 [98].

To generate a phylogenetic tree based on gene content, pair-wise BLAST comparisons of the proteins encoded for each possible genome pair were performed. Proteins-pairs were scored as conserved between two genomes when the two proteins were each other's best BLAST hits and had an identity of ≥ 90%. The distance between two genomes was then calculated as 1 - [number of conserved CDS/number of CDS in smallest genome]. Based on this resulting distance matrix, a neighbour-joining tree was constructed and visualized using SplitsTree4 [98].

Determination of antibiotic resistance in E. faecium

The MICs of the antibiotics ampicillin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, gentamicin, spectinomycin, streptromycin, tetracycline, and vancomycin against the seven E. faecium strains of which the genomes were sequenced, was determined in a broth microdilution assay in cation-adjusted Muller-Hinton Broth (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom) according to previously published methods [99, 100]. Antibiotics were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands).

Pan- and core-genome analysis

The new gene discovery rate, and the size of the pan- and core-genome were estimated for E. faecium. All-vs-all WU-BLASTP [101] and all-vs-all WU-TBLASTN searches were performed on the seven E. faecium genomes. Results from these two searches were combined such that WU-TBLASTN hits prevented missing gene predictions from producing false-negatives. Hits were filtered using 50% sequence similarity and 50% coverage, as previously described previously [102]. The number (N) of independent measurements of the core genes (those shared by all E. faecium isolates) and new genes present in the nth genome is N = [S]!/[(n - 1)!· ([S] - n)!], where S = 7, the number of sequenced strains. To reduce the number of required computations 1,000 measurements were randomly sampled for each value of n. The new gene discovery rate was modeled by fitting the power law function Fnew(n) = κnewn-αto the median number of new genes calculated for all strain combinations where n is the number of strains, and κnew and α are free parameters. An α ≤ 1 indicates an open pan-genome while α > 1 indicates a closed pan-genome [54]. The pan-genome itself represents the trend of the complete gene repertoire as more genomes are sequenced. The median number of shared and new genes was calculated for all strain combinations and a power law Fpan(n) = κpan where n is the number of strains and κnew and γ are free parameters. γ > 0 indicates an open pan-genome [54]. The number of core genes was estimated by fitting the exponential decay function Fcore(n) = κcore exp [-ncore] + tgcore(θ) to the median number of core genes calculated for all strain combinations. n is the number of sequenced strains and κcore, τcore, tgcore(θ) are free parameters. tgcore(θ) represents the extrapolated number of core genes assuming a consistent sampling mechanism and a large number of completed sequences.

Bacteriophages in E. faecium

A first group of putative CDS of bacteriophage origin were identified based on the annotation (as phage proteins or with "prophage functions" as predicted cellular role) provided by the JCVI Annotation Pipeline. The phage origins of these proteins were further confirmed by BLAST searches which resulted in the identification of homologous proteins of bacteriophages in Firmicutes. These analyses were then expanded to include genes that appeared to form part of a complete or partial phage genome on the basis of the presence of one or more prophage modules in a larger gene cluster.

The activation of bacteriophages in the sequenced E. faecium strains was studied by exposing E. faecium cultures in the exponential growth phase (A660 = 0.2) to 1 μg/ml mitomycin, followed by a further incubation for 18 h at 37°C. These phage lysates were centrifuged (4150 g, 5 min) and 6-ml filter-sterilized aliquots of the supernatant were then ultracentrifuged at 81,000 g for 2 h. Pellets were washed with 0.1 M ammonium acetate, pH 7.5, followed by another ultracentrifugation step (81,000 g, 2 h.) and resuspended in 100 μl 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 86 mM NaCl, 17 mM MgSO4. Transmission electron microscopy with negative staining using uranylacetate was performed on these samples as described previously [22].

Infectivity of the phages was tested by the soft-agar layer technique. BHI plates were covered with BHI with 4% bacteriological agar, which was inoculated at 0.5% with an overnight culture of an indicator strain. As indicators the seven strains of which the genome was sequenced in this study were used. After the soft agar layer had cooled down to room temperature, 10 μl aliquots of the filter-sterilized phage lysate was spotted on the plates. Subsequently, plates were incubated overnight at 37°C, followed by visual inspection for phage plaques.

Identification and mobilization of the E. faecium esp PAI

To close the sequence of the contigs containing the esp PAI in E1162, E1679 and U0317 sequence alignments were generated with the genome sequences of strains that did not carry the esp gene and previously published sequence of the genes immediately flanking the esp gene [62]. This resulted in a putative order of contigs surrounding the esp PAI, which was then confirmed by designing primers (sequences available on request) on the contig ends, followed by PCR (using AccuPrime™ Taq DNA Polymerase High Fidelity; Invitrogen, Breda, The Netherlands) and Sanger-sequencing of the generated PCR products. Assembly of the esp PAIs based on the generated sequences of gap-spanning PCRs and the contig sequences was done using Seqman 4.0 (DNAStar, Madison WI).

The mobilization of the esp PAI was studied by performing filter-mating experiments with strain E1162Δesp[16], which carries a chloramphenicol resistance cassette that is integrated in the esp gene, as donor strain and strain BM4105RF, a rifampicin and fusidic acid resistant derivative of the plasmid-free strain E. faecium BM4105 [103], as recipient strain. Overnight cultures of these strains were diluted 1:20 in BHI broth and further cultured at 37°C until A660 = 1.0. Subsequently, 1 ml aliquots of both cultures were mixed, spun down (2 min, 14,000 g), and after washing the cell pellet with phosphate buffered saline (PBS; 138 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 140 mM Na2HPO4, 1.8 mM KH2PO4, adjusted to pH 7.4 with HCl), the cells were resuspended in 30 μl BHI. The cell suspension was spotted on a nitro-cellulose filter (25 mm diameter, 0.45 μm; VWR, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) that was placed on Tryptic Soy Agar supplemented with 5% sheep blood. After overnight incubation, the filter was resuspended in 1 ml BHI and serial dilutions of this cell suspension were prepared in PBS. Aliquots of 200 μl were spread on BHI plates containing chloramphenicol at 10 μg/ml (for quantification of the number of cells of the donor strain), on BHI plates containing rifampicin and fusidic acid, both at 25 μg/ml (for quantification of the number of cells of the recipient strain), and on BHI plates containing all three antibiotics, to isolate transconjugants. Transconjugation efficiency was calculated as the viable counts on the BHI plates with chloramphenicol, rifampicin and fusidic acid divided by the viable counts on BHI plates with rifampicin and fusidic acid. This assay was perfomed in triplicate. Potential transconjugants were tested for presence of the esp gene by PCR as described previously [104]. PFGE on SmaI-digested total DNA was performed as described previously [105] to confirm that the transconjugant had the same genetic background as E. faecium BM4105RF. Lamba Ladder PFG Marker (New England Biolabs, Ipswich MA) was used to estimate the sizes of the PFGE fragments. Southern blotting and probe hybridization was performed as described previously [16]. The probes used in the hybridizations were generated by PCR with the primer-pairs esp.14F (5'-AGATTTCATCTTTGATTCTTGG-3') and esp.12R (5'-AATTGATTCTTTAGCATCTGG-3'), and DO1.F (5'-GCTTACTTACTCGTGACGC-3') and DO1.R (5'-GAAAAGTTAGGATTAAGGTAACTGC-3') on chromosomal DNA of strains E1162 and DO, respectively. The esp PAI insertion site was also studied using PCRs with primer-pairs DO1.F and DO1.R, which cover the esp PAI insertion site, with primer pairs DO1.F and PAIup.R (5'-CAAACATTAAGCTTTTTCACTTC-3'), which cover the 5' end of the esp PAI and with primer pairs PAIdown.R (5'-CCAACAATTGCTTGAACAG-3') and DO1.R, which cover the 3' end of the esp PAI and the 3' flanking end of the insertion site. Due to sequence heterogeneity in the downstream region of the rpsI gene, the primer DO1.R did not yield a product in PCRs on BM4105RF and the transconjugant (data not shown). This primer was therefore replaced by TC1.1R (5'-CGTCTGAATCGTTGATCTATAAG-3') in PCRs on BM4105RF and transconjugant genomic DNA. The 1 Kb Plus DNA Ladder (Invitrogen) was used as marker.



Multi Locus Sequence Typing


Clonal Complex


Microbial Surface Components Recognizing Adhesive Matrix Molecules


Sequence Type


Minimum Inhibitory Concentration


Single Nucleotide Polymorphism


Cluster of Orthologous Groups






Coding Sequence(s)


Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats


Insertion Sequence


Pathogenicity Island


Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis


J. Craig Venter Institute


Brain Heart Infusion


Phosphate Buffered Saline


Baylor College of Medicine.


  1. 1.

    List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature - Genus Enterococcus. []

  2. 2.

    Naser S, Thompson FL, Hoste B, Gevers D, Vandemeulebroecke K, Cleenwerck I, Thompson CC, Vancanneyt M, Swings J: Phylogeny and identification of Enterococci by atpA gene sequence analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 2224-2230. 10.1128/JCM.43.5.2224-2230.2005.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Devriese L, Baele M, Butaye P: The Genus Enterococcus. The Prokaryotes. Edited by: Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer KH, Stackebrandt E. 2006, Springer: New York, 4: 163-174. full_text. 3

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Top J, Willems R, Blok H, de Regt M, Jalink K, Troelstra A, Goorhuis B, Bonten M: Ecological replacement of Enterococcus faecalis by multiresistant clonal complex 17 Enterococcus faecium. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007, 13: 316-319. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01631.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Treitman AN, Yarnold PR, Warren J, Noskin GA: Emerging incidence of Enterococcus faecium among hospital isolates (1993 to 2002). J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 462-463. 10.1128/JCM.43.1.462-463.2005.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hidron AI, Edwards JR, Patel J, Horan TC, Sievert DM, Pollock DA, Fridkin SK: NHSN annual update: antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: annual summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006-2007. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008, 29: 996-1011. 10.1086/591861.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Werner G, Coque TM, Hammerum AM, Hope R, Hryniewicz W, Johnson A, Klare I, Kristinsson KG, Leclercq R, Lester CH, Lillie M, Novais C, Olsson-Liljequist B, Peixe LV, Sadowy E, Simonsen GS, Top J, Vuopio-Varkila J, Willems RJ, Witte W, Woodford N: Emergence and spread of vancomycin resistance among enterococci in Europe. Euro Surveill. 2008, 13: pii = 19046.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Montero CI, Stock F, Murray PR: Mechanisms of resistance to daptomycin in Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008, 52: 1167-1170. 10.1128/AAC.00774-07.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Scheetz MH, Knechtel SA, Malczynski M, Postelnick MJ, Qi C: Increasing incidence of linezolid-intermediate or -resistant, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium strains parallels increasing linezolid consumption. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008, 52: 2256-2259. 10.1128/AAC.00070-08.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Arias CA, Murray BE: Antibiotic-resistant bugs in the 21st century--a clinical super-challenge. N Engl J Med. 2009, 360: 439-443. 10.1056/NEJMp0804651.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Leavis HL, Willems RJL, van Wamel WJB, Schuren FH, Caspers MPM, Bonten MJM: Insertion sequence-driven diversification creates a globally dispersed emerging multiresistant subspecies of E. faecium. PLoS Pathog. 2007, 3: e7-10.1371/journal.ppat.0030007.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Willems RJ, Top J, Braak van Den N, van Belkum A, Endtz H, Mevius D, Stobberingh E, Bogaard van Den A, van Embden JD: Host specificity of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. J Infect Dis. 2000, 182: 816-823. 10.1086/315752.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Vancanneyt M, Lombardi A, Andrighetto C, Knijff E, Torriani S, Björkroth KJ, Franz CMAP, Foulquié Moreno MR, Revets H, De Vuyst L, Swings J, Kersters K, Dellaglio F, Holzapfel WH: Intraspecies genomic groups in Enterococcus faecium and their correlation with origin and pathogenicity. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002, 68: 1381-1391. 10.1128/AEM.68.3.1381-1391.2002.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Willems RJL, Top J, van Santen M, Robinson DA, Coque TM, Baquero F, Grundmann H, Bonten MJM: Global spread of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium from distinct nosocomial genetic complex. Emerging Infect Dis. 2005, 11: 821-828.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Leavis HL, Bonten MJM, Willems RJL: Identification of high-risk enterococcal clonal complexes: global dispersion and antibiotic resistance. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2006, 9: 454-460. 10.1016/j.mib.2006.07.001.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Heikens E, Bonten MJM, Willems RJL: Enterococcal surface protein Esp is important for biofilm formation of Enterococcus faecium E1162. J Bacteriol. 2007, 189: 8233-8240. 10.1128/JB.01205-07.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Leendertse M, Esther Heikens, Wijnands L, van Luit-Asbroek M, Teske G, Roelofs J, Bonten MJ, Poll van der T, Willems RJ: Enterococcal surface protein transiently aggravates Enterococcus faecium induced urinary tract infection in mice. J Infect Dis. 2009, 200: 1162-1165. 10.1086/605609.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Nallapareddy SR, Weinstock GM, Murray BE: Clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecium exhibit strain-specific collagen binding mediated by Acm, a new member of the MSCRAMM family. Mol Microbiol. 2003, 47: 1733-1747. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03417.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Nallapareddy SR, Singh KV, Murray BE: Contribution of the collagen adhesin Acm to pathogenesis of Enterococcus faecium in experimental endocarditis. Infect Immun. 2008, 76: 4120-4128. 10.1128/IAI.00376-08.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Rice LB, Carias L, Rudin S, Vael C, Goossens H, Konstabel C, Klare I, Nallapareddy SR, Huang W, Murray BE: A potential virulence gene, hylEfm, predominates in Enterococcus faecium of clinical origin. J Infect Dis. 2003, 187: 508-512. 10.1086/367711.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Arias CA, Panesso D, Singh KV, Rice LB, Murray BE: Cotransfer of antibiotic resistance genes and a hylEfm-containing virulence plasmid in Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009, 53: 4240-4246. 10.1128/AAC.00242-09.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hendrickx APA, van Wamel WJB, Posthuma G, Bonten MJM, Willems RJL: Five genes encoding surface-exposed LPXTG proteins are enriched in hospital-adapted Enterococcus faecium clonal complex 17 isolates. J Bacteriol. 2007, 189: 8321-8332. 10.1128/JB.00664-07.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sillanpää J, Nallapareddy SR, Prakash VP, Qin X, Höök M, Weinstock GM, Murray BE: Identification and phenotypic characterization of a second collagen adhesin, Scm, and genome-based identification and analysis of 13 other predicted MSCRAMMs, including four distinct pilus loci, in Enterococcus faecium. Microbiology. 2008, 154: 3199-3211. 10.1099/mic.0.2008/017319-0.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hendrickx APA, van Luit-Asbroek M, Schapendonk CME, van Wamel WJB, Braat JC, Wijnands LM, Bonten MJM, Willems RJL: SgrA, a nidogen-binding LPXTG surface adhesin implicated in biofilm formation, and EcbA, a Collagen Binding MSCRAMM, are two novel adhesins of hospital-acquired Enterococcus faecium. Infect Immun. 2009, 77: 5097-5106. 10.1128/IAI.00275-09.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    MacLean D, Jones JDG, Studholme DJ: Application of 'next-generation' sequencing technologies to microbial genetics. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009, 7: 287-296.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Tauch A, Schneider J, Szczepanowski R, Tilker A, Viehoever P, Gartemann K, Arnold W, Blom J, Brinkrolf K, Brune I, Götker S, Weisshaar B, Goesmann A, Dröge M, Pühler A: Ultrafast pyrosequencing of Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii DSM44385 revealed insights into the physiology of a lipophilic corynebacterium that lacks mycolic acids. J Biotechnol. 2008, 136: 22-30. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.03.004.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, Berka J, Braverman MS, Chen Y, Chen Z, Dewell SB, Du L, Fierro JM, Gomes XV, Godwin BC, He W, Helgesen S, Ho CH, Ho CH, Irzyk GP, Jando SC, Alenquer MLI, Jarvie TP, Jirage KB, Kim J, Knight JR, Lanza JR, Leamon JH, Lefkowitz SM, Lei M: Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature. 2005, 437: 376-380.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Smith MG, Gianoulis TA, Pukatzki S, Mekalanos JJ, Ornston LN, Gerstein M, Snyder M: New insights into Acinetobacter baumannii pathogenesis revealed by high-density pyrosequencing and transposon mutagenesis. Genes Dev. 2007, 21: 601-614. 10.1101/gad.1510307.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Hogg JS, Hu FZ, Janto B, Boissy R, Hayes J, Keefe R, Post JC, Ehrlich GD: Characterization and modeling of the Haemophilus influenzae core and supragenomes based on the complete genomic sequences of Rd and 12 clinical nontypeable strains. Genome Biol. 2007, 8: R103-10.1186/gb-2007-8-6-r103.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Homan WL, Tribe D, Poznanski S, Li M, Hogg G, Spalburg E, van Embden JDA, Willems RJL: Multilocus Sequence Typing Scheme for Enterococcus faecium. J Clin Microbiol. 2002, 40: 1963-1971. 10.1128/JCM.40.6.1963-1971.2002.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lander ES, Waterman MS: Genomic mapping by fingerprinting random clones: a mathematical analysis. Genomics. 1988, 2: 231-239. 10.1016/0888-7543(88)90007-9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Tatusov RL, Natale DA, Garkavtsev IV, Tatusova TA, Shankavaram UT, Rao BS, Kiryutin B, Galperin MY, Fedorova ND, Koonin EV: The COG database: new developments in phylogenetic classification of proteins from complete genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29: 22-28. 10.1093/nar/29.1.22.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Willems RJ, Top J, Braak van den N, van Belkum A, Mevius DJ, Hendriks G, van Santen-Verheuvel M, van Embden JD: Molecular diversity and evolutionary relationships of Tn1546-like elements in enterococci from humans and animals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999, 43: 483-491. 10.1093/jac/43.4.483.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Arthur M, Molinas C, Depardieu F, Courvalin P: Characterization of Tn1546, a Tn3-related transposon conferring glycopeptide resistance by synthesis of depsipeptide peptidoglycan precursors in Enterococcus faecium BM4147. J Bacteriol. 1993, 175: 117-127.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Rice LB, Bellais S, Carias LL, Hutton-Thomas R, Bonomo RA, Caspers P, Page MGP, Gutmann L: Impact of specific pbp5 mutations on expression of beta-lactam resistance in Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004, 48: 3028-3032. 10.1128/AAC.48.8.3028-3032.2004.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Fontana R, Aldegheri M, Ligozzi M, Lopez H, Sucari A, Satta G: Overproduction of a low-affinity penicillin-binding protein and high-level ampicillin resistance in Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994, 38: 1980-1983.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Leavis HL, Willems RJL, Top J, Bonten MJM: High-level ciprofloxacin resistance from point mutations in gyrA and parC confined to global hospital-adapted clonal lineage CC17 of Enterococcus faecium. J Clin Microbiol. 2006, 44: 1059-1064. 10.1128/JCM.44.3.1059-1064.2006.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Camargo ILBC, Gilmore MS, Darini ALC: Multilocus sequence typing and analysis of putative virulence factors in vancomycin-resistant and vancomycin-sensitive Enterococcus faecium isolates from Brazil. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006, 12: 1123-1130. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01496.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Freitas AR, Novais C, Ruiz-Garbajosa P, Coque TM, Peixe L: Dispersion of multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates belonging to major clonal complexes in different Portuguese settings. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009, 75: 4904-4908. 10.1128/AEM.02945-08.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Hasman H: The tcrB gene is part of the tcrYAZB operon conferring copper resistance in Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis. Microbiology. 2005, 151: 3019-3025. 10.1099/mic.0.28109-0.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Hasman H, Kempf I, Chidaine B, Cariolet R, Ersbøll AK, Houe H, Bruun Hansen HC, Aarestrup FM: Copper resistance in Enterococcus faecium, mediated by the tcrB gene, is selected by supplementation of pig feed with copper sulfate. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006, 72: 5784-5789. 10.1128/AEM.02979-05.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Jensen LB: Differences in the occurrence of two base pair variants of Tn1546 from vancomycin-resistant enterococci from humans, pigs, and poultry. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998, 42: 2463-2464.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Deibel RH, Lake DE, Niven CF: Physiology of the enterococci as related to their taxonomy. J Bacteriol. 1963, 86: 1275-1282.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kandler O: Carbohydrate metabolism in lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1983, 49: 209-224. 10.1007/BF00399499.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Cavin JF, Barthelmebs L, Diviès C: Molecular characterization of an inducible p-coumaric acid decarboxylase from Lactobacillus plantarum: gene cloning, transcriptional analysis, overexpression in Escherichia coli, purification, and characterization. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997, 63: 1939-1944.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Del Papa MF, Perego M: Ethanolamine activates a sensor histidine kinase regulating its utilization in Enterococcus faecalis. J Bacteriol. 2008, 190: 7147-7156. 10.1128/JB.00952-08.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Frankenberg L, Brugna M, Hederstedt L: Enterococcus faecalis heme-dependent catalase. J Bacteriol. 2002, 184: 6351-6356. 10.1128/JB.184.22.6351-6356.2002.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Paulsen IT, Banerjei L, Myers GSA, Nelson KE, Seshadri R, Read TD, Fouts DE, Eisen JA, Gill SR, Heidelberg JF, Tettelin H, Dodson RJ, Umayam L, Brinkac L, Beanan M, Daugherty S, DeBoy RT, Durkin S, Kolonay J, Madupu R, Nelson W, Vamathevan J, Tran B, Upton J, Hansen T, Shetty J, Khouri H, Utterback T, Radune D, Ketchum KA: Role of mobile DNA in the evolution of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis. Science. 2003, 299: 2071-2074. 10.1126/science.1080613.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Logan C, Mayhew SG: Cloning, overexpression, and characterization of peroxiredoxin and NADH peroxiredoxin reductase from Thermus aquaticus. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 30019-30028. 10.1074/jbc.M004161200.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Newton GL, Arnold K, Price MS, Sherrill C, Delcardayre SB, Aharonowitz Y, Cohen G, Davies J, Fahey RC, Davis C: Distribution of thiols in microorganisms: mycothiol is a major thiol in most actinomycetes. J Bacteriol. 1996, 178: 1990-1995.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Li Y, Hugenholtz J, Abee T, Molenaar D: Glutathione protects Lactococcus lactis against oxidative stress. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003, 69: 5739-5745. 10.1128/AEM.69.10.5739-5745.2003.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Winstedt L, Frankenberg L, Hederstedt L, von Wachenfeldt C: Enterococcus faecalis V583 contains a cytochrome bd-type respiratory oxidase. J Bacteriol. 2000, 182: 3863-3866. 10.1128/JB.182.13.3863-3866.2000.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Huycke MM, Moore D, Joyce W, Wise P, Shepard L, Kotake Y, Gilmore MS: Extracellular superoxide production by Enterococcus faecalis requires demethylmenaquinone and is attenuated by functional terminal quinol oxidases. Mol Microbiol. 2001, 42: 729-740. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02638.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Tettelin H, Riley D, Cattuto C, Medini D: Comparative genomics: the bacterial pan-genome. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2008, 11: 472-477. 10.1016/j.mib.2008.09.006.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Sorek R, Kunin V, Hugenholtz P: CRISPR--a widespread system that provides acquired resistance against phages in bacteria and archaea. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008, 6: 181-186. 10.1038/nrmicro1793.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Horvath P, Coûté-Monvoisin A, Romero DA, Boyaval P, Fremaux C, Barrangou R: Comparative analysis of CRISPR loci in lactic acid bacteria genomes. Int J Food Microbiol. 2009, 131: 62-70. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.05.030.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Bourgogne A, Garsin DA, Qin X, Singh KV, Sillanpaa J, Yerrapragada S, Ding Y, Dugan-Rocha S, Buhay C, Shen H, Chen G, Williams G, Muzny D, Maadani A, Fox KA, Gioia J, Chen L, Shang Y, Arias CA, Nallapareddy SR, Zhao M, Prakash VP, Chowdhury S, Jiang H, Gibbs RA, Murray BE, Highlander SK, Weinstock GM: Large scale variation in Enterococcus faecalis illustrated by the genome analysis of strain OG1RF. Genome Biol. 2008, 9: R110-10.1186/gb-2008-9-7-r110.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Braun V, Hertwig S, Neve H, Geis A, Teuber M: Taxonomic differentiation of bacteriophages of Lactococcus lactis by electron microscopy, DNA-DNA hybridization, and protein profiles. Microbiology. 1989, 135: 2551-2560. 10.1099/00221287-135-9-2551.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Canchaya C, Proux C, Fournous G, Bruttin A, Brussow H: Prophage Genomics. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2003, 67: 238-276. 10.1128/MMBR.67.2.238-276.2003.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Brüssow H: Impact of phages on evolution of bacterial pathogenicity. Bacterial Pathogenomics. Edited by: Pallen MJ, Nelson KE, Preston GM. 2007, Washington DC: ASM Press, 267-300.

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Nallapareddy SR, Singh KV, Okhuysen PC, Murray BE: A functional collagen adhesin gene, acm, in clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecium correlates with the recent success of this emerging nosocomial pathogen. Infect Immun. 2008, 76: 4110-4119. 10.1128/IAI.00375-08.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Leavis H, Top J, Shankar N, Borgen K, Bonten M, van Embden J, Willems RJL: A novel putative enterococcal pathogenicity island linked to the esp virulence gene of Enterococcus faecium and associated with epidemicity. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 672-682. 10.1128/JB.186.3.672-682.2004.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Shankar N, Baghdayan AS, Gilmore MS: Modulation of virulence within a pathogenicity island in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis. Nature. 2002, 417: 746-750. 10.1038/nature00802.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Papp-Wallace KM, Maguire ME: Manganese transport and the role of manganese in virulence. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2006, 60: 187-209. 10.1146/annurev.micro.60.080805.142149.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Burrus V, Pavlovic G, Decaris B, Guédon G: The ICESt1 element of Streptococcus thermophilus belongs to a large family of integrative and conjugative elements that exchange modules and change their specificity of integration. Plasmid. 2002, 48: 77-97. 10.1016/S0147-619X(02)00102-6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Oancea C, Klare I, Witte W, Werner G: Conjugative transfer of the virulence gene, esp, among isolates of Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004, 54: 232-235. 10.1093/jac/dkh249.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Klare I, Konstabel C, Badstübner D, Werner G, Witte W: Occurrence and spread of antibiotic resistances in Enterococcus faecium. Int J Food Microbiol. 2003, 88: 269-290. 10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00190-9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Leclercq R, Derlot E, Weber M, Duval J, Courvalin P: Transferable vancomycin and teicoplanin resistance in Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989, 33: 10-15.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Witte W: Glycopeptide resistant Staphylococcus. J Vet Med Series B. 2004, 51: 370-373. 10.1111/j.1439-0450.2004.00774.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Müller T, Ulrich A, Ott EM, Müller M: Identification of plant-associated enterococci. J Appl Microbiol. 2001, 91: 268-278. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01373.x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Riboulet E, Verneuil N, La Carbona S, Sauvageot N, Auffray Y, Hartke A, Giard J: Relationships between oxidative stress response and virulence in Enterococcus faecalis. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007, 13: 140-146. 10.1159/000103605.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Moy TI, Mylonakis E, Calderwood SB, Ausubel FM: Cytotoxicity of hydrogen peroxide produced by Enterococcus faecium. Infect Immun. 2004, 72: 4512-4520. 10.1128/IAI.72.8.4512-4520.2004.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Turner KME, Hanage WP, Fraser C, Connor TR, Spratt BG: Assessing the reliability of eBURST using simulated populations with known ancestry. BMC Microbiol. 2007, 7: 30-10.1186/1471-2180-7-30.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Willems RJL, van Schaik W: Transition of Enterococcus faecium from commensal organism to nosocomial pathogen. Future Microbiol. 2009, 4: 1125-1135. 10.2217/fmb.09.82.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Marraffini LA, Sontheimer EJ: CRISPR interference limits horizontal gene transfer in staphylococci by targeting DNA. Science. 2008, 322: 1843-1845. 10.1126/science.1165771.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Abriouel H, Omar NB, Molinos AC, López RL, Grande MJ, Martínez-Viedma P, Ortega E, Cañamero MM, Galvez A: Comparative analysis of genetic diversity and incidence of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance among enterococcal populations from raw fruit and vegetable foods, water and soil, and clinical samples. Int J Food Microbiol. 2008, 123: 38-49. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.11.067.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Willems RJ, Homan W, Top J, van Santen-Verheuvel M, Tribe D, Manzioros X, Gaillard C, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, Mascini EM, van Kregten E, van Embden JD, Bonten MJ: Variant esp gene as a marker of a distinct genetic lineage of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium spreading in hospitals. Lancet. 2001, 357: 853-855. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04205-7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Brochet M, Couvé E, Glaser P, Guédon G, Payot S: Integrative conjugative elements and related elements are major contributors to the genome diversity of Streptococcus agalactiae. J Bacteriol. 2008, 190: 6913-6917. 10.1128/JB.00824-08.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Sletvold H, Johnsen PJ, Hamre I, Simonsen GS, Sundsfjord A, Nielsen KM: Complete sequence of Enterococcus faecium pVEF3 and the detection of an omega-epsilon-zeta toxin-antitoxin module and an ABC transporter. Plasmid. 2008, 60: 75-85. 10.1016/j.plasmid.2008.04.002.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Hasman H, Villadsen AG, Aarestrup FM: Diversity and stability of plasmids from glycopeptide-resistant Enterococcus faecium (GRE) isolated from pigs in Denmark. Microb Drug Resist. 2005, 11: 178-184. 10.1089/mdr.2005.11.178.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Rosvoll TC, Pedersen T, Sletvold H, Johnsen PJ, Sollid JE, Simonsen GS, Jensen LB, Nielsen KM, Sundsfjord A: PCR-based plasmid typing in Enterococcus faecium strains reveals widely distributed pRE25-, pRUM-, pIP501- and pHTβ-related replicons associated with glycopeptide resistance and stabilizing toxin-antitoxin systems. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2010, 58: 254-268. 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2009.00633.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    JCVI Annotation Service. []

  83. 83.

    Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL: Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27: 4636-4641. 10.1093/nar/27.23.4636.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    BLAST-Extend-Repraze. []

  85. 85.

    Eddy SR: Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics. 1998, 14: 755-763. 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.755.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Haft DH, Loftus BJ, Richardson DL, Yang F, Eisen JA, Paulsen IT, White O: TIGRFAMs: a protein family resource for the functional identification of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29: 41-43. 10.1093/nar/29.1.41.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Bateman A, Birney E, Durbin R, Eddy SR, Howe KL, Sonnhammer EL: The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28: 263-266. 10.1093/nar/28.1.263.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL: Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol. 2001, 305: 567-580. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Bendtsen JD, Nielsen H, von Heijne G, Brunak S: Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0. J Mol Biol. 2004, 340: 783-795. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.05.028.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt H, Rognes T, Ussery DW: RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35: 3100-3108. 10.1093/nar/gkm160.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Snel B, Bork P, Huynen MA: The identification of functional modules from the genomic association of genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 5890-5895. 10.1073/pnas.092632599.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Grissa I, Vergnaud G, Pourcel C: CRISPRFinder: a web tool to identify clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35: W52-57. 10.1093/nar/gkm360.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    NCBI BLAST. []

  94. 94.

    Carver TJ, Rutherford KM, Berriman M, Rajandream M, Barrell BG, Parkhill J: ACT: the Artemis Comparison Tool. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21: 3422-3423. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti553.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Double ACT. []

  96. 96.

    Edgar RC: MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004, 5: 113-10.1186/1471-2105-5-113.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Guindon S, Gascuel O: A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 2003, 52: 696-704. 10.1080/10635150390235520.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Splitstree. []

  99. 99.

    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically; Approved Standard. 2009, Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 8

    Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Andrews JM: Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001, 48 (Suppl 1): 5-16.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Lopez R, Silventoinen V, Robinson S, Kibria A, Gish W: WU-Blast2 server at the European Bioinformatics Institute. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 3795-3798. 10.1093/nar/gkg573.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Tettelin H, Masignani V, Cieslewicz MJ, Donati C, Medini D, Ward NL, Angiuoli SV, Crabtree J, Jones AL, Durkin AS, Deboy RT, Davidsen TM, Mora M, Scarselli M, Margarit y Ros I, Peterson JD, Hauser CR, Sundaram JP, Nelson WC, Madupu R, Brinkac LM, Dodson RJ, Rosovitz MJ, Sullivan SA, Daugherty SC, Haft DH, Selengut J, Gwinn ML, Zhou L, Zafar N: Genome analysis of multiple pathogenic isolates of Streptococcus agalactiae : implications for the microbial "pan-genome". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 13950-13955. 10.1073/pnas.0506758102.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Carlier C, Courvalin P: Emergence of 4',4"-aminoglycoside nucleotidyltransferase in enterococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990, 34: 1565-1569.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Leavis HL, Willems RJL, Top J, Spalburg E, Mascini EM, Fluit AC, Hoepelman A, de Neeling AJ, Bonten MJM: Epidemic and nonepidemic multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Emerging Infect Dis. 2003, 9: 1108-1115.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Murray BE, Singh KV, Heath JD, Sharma BR, Weinstock GM: Comparison of genomic DNAs of different enterococcal isolates using restriction endonucleases with infrequent recognition sites. J Clin Microbiol. 1990, 28: 2059-2063.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    de Wit MA, Koopmans MP, Kortbeek LM, van Leeuwen NJ, Bartelds AI, van Duynhoven YT: Gastroenteritis in sentinel general practices, The Netherlands. Emerging Infect Dis. 2001, 7: 82-91. 10.3201/eid0701.010113.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors wish to thank Keygene BV (Wageningen, The Netherlands) for performing the sequencing runs and genome assembly and JCVI for its Annotation Service which provided us with automatic annotation data. We gratefully acknowledge Baylor College of Medicine (BCM) Human Genome Sequencing Center and JCVI for releasing the genome sequence data for E. faecalis strains ATCC29200, HH22, TX0104 and TX1332 (sequenced by BCM) and TUSoD Ef11 (sequenced by JCVI) prior to publication. These E. faecalis genomes were sequenced as part of the Reference Genome Initiative of the NIH-sponsored Human Microbiome Project. Our research was funded through a grant from the European Union Sixth Framework Programme under contract LSHE-CT-2007-037410 and a NWO-Veni grant (916.86.044).

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Willem van Schaik.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

WvS, MJMB, and RJW designed research. JT, JEPV, CMES and APAH performed experiments. WvS, DRR, JB, IJN, and HT analyzed data. WvS, DRR, MJMB, HT, and RJW wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Additional file 1: Supplementary figure - plasmid content of sequenced strains. The figure shows the presence of large plasmids in the sequenced E. faecium strains as determined by S1 nuclease PFGE. (PDF 3 MB)

Additional file 2: Supplementary table - overview of COGs present in E. faecium genomes. Table in Excel-format of the COGs present in the seven sequenced E. faecium genomes. The first worksheet gives an overview of the number of proteins that were assigned to COGs in each genome sequence. The other worksheets give the proteins (identified by locus tags) that were assigned to COGs for each genome sequence. (XLS 2 MB)

Additional file 3: Supplementary figure - graphical overview of COG superfamilies in the E. faecium genomes. The figure shows the classification into COG superfamilies of the proteins encoded by the sequenced genomes. (PDF 863 KB)

Additional file 4: Supplementary table - antibiotic resistance genes in the sequenced E. faecium isolates. Table in Excel format of antibiotic resistance phenotypes and the associated antibiotic resistance genes in the sequenced E. faecium isolates. (XLS 48 KB)

Additional file 5: Supplementary table - COGs present in E. faecium and absent from E. faecalis. Table in Excel format with COGs that are present in all E. faecium genomes sequenced in this study and that are absent from all six available E. faecalis genome sequences. (XLS 56 KB)

Additional file 6: Supplementary table - COGs present in E. faecalis and absent from E. faecium. Table in Excel format with COGs that are present in all six available E. faecalis genome sequences and that are absent from the E. faecium genomes sequenced in this study. (XLS 78 KB)

Additional file 7: Supplementary table - the number of shared CDS between the different E. faecium isolates. Table in Excel format with the number of CDS shared between E. faecium isolates. Of all possible pairwise comparisons of the seven strains described in this study the total number of shared CDS and the percentage shared CDS relative to the smallest of the two compared genomes is indicated. (XLS 26 KB)

Additional file 8: Supplementary table - Proteins unique to infectious E. faecium isolates. Table in Excel format of the proteins that are conserved in the four infectious isolates (E1162, E1636, E1679, and U0317) and which are absent in the non-infectious isolates (E980, E1039, and E1071). (XLS 32 KB)

Additional file 9: Supplementary figure - Sequence alignment of the 54 bp repeat flanking genomic islands integrated in the rpsI locus. This figure shows the sequence alignment of the imperfect 54 bp repeat that is flanking genomic islands that have integrated in the rpsI locus. (PDF 17 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Schaik, W., Top, J., Riley, D.R. et al. Pyrosequencing-based comparative genome analysis of the nosocomial pathogen Enterococcus faecium and identification of a large transferable pathogenicity island. BMC Genomics 11, 239 (2010).

Download citation


  • Antibiotic Resistance Gene
  • Fusidic Acid
  • Cluster Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat
  • Nosocomial Pathogen
  • Cluster Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat Locus