Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Genome-wide promoter methylation profile of human testis and epididymis: identified from cell-free seminal DNA

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1, 3Email author,
  • 1, 3 and
  • 1, 3
BMC Genomics201314:288

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-288

©  Wu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

  • Received: 1 September 2012
  • Accepted: 24 April 2013
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

DNA methylation analysis is useful for investigation of male fertility in mammals, whereas the reliance on tissues limits the research on human. We have previously found the presence of high concentration of cell-free seminal DNA (cfsDNA) in human semen. We proposed that some testis and epididymis-specific methylated promoters could be detected in human cfsDNA, and thus hold promise as noninvasive epigenetic biomarkers for male infertility, of which most cases are caused by defects in testicular sperm production or epididymal sperm maturation.

Results

The ejaculate of successfully vasectomized men does not contain any secretion from testis and epididymis. Here we compared genome-wide promoter methylation profiles in cfsDNA between health donors and post-vasectomy men. Promoters of 367 testis and epididymis-specific hypomethylated genes and 134 hypermethylated genes were identified. Subsequent validation by Methyl-DNA immunoprecipitation and MethyLight analysis confirmed the result of promoter microarray. Gene Ontology analysis revealed many genes involved in male reproduction.

Conclusion

We detected the testis and epididymis-specific methylated promoters in human cfsDNA, which may be used for noninvasive epigenetic biomarkers for the study and diagnosis of male infertility.

Keywords

  • DNA methylation
  • Cell-free seminal DNA
  • Testis
  • Epididymis
  • Vasectomy
  • Noninvasive diagnosis

Background

Cell-free nucleic acids, including DNA and RNA, exist ubiquitously as cell-free or being absorbed at the cell surface of living organisms [1]. They are found to be released via apoptotic or necrotic cells, and be actively secreted by living cells [1, 2]. Cell-free DNA, as a type of cell-free nucleic acids, can be isolated from various human body fluids including blood plasma [3, 4], urine [5], cerebrospinal fluid [6], bronchoalveolar lavage fluid [7], amniotic fluid [8], and seminal plasma [9, 10]. The isolated cell-free DNA can be used to examine DNA integrity, microsatellite instability, loss of heterozygosity, mutations, polymorphisms, and DNA methylation [2]. In recent years, considerable attention has been paid to taking advantage of tissue or cell-specific DNA methylation markers in cell-free DNA, which represents one of the most promising approaches for detection and prognosis of cancers, and prenatal diagnosis [2, 4, 8].

Cell-free seminal DNA (cfsDNA) has been detected in human semen [10]. Our previous work has isolated cfsDNA and described its characteristics [9]. Given that human ejaculate is a mixture secreted from bilateral testes, epididymides, seminal vesicles, bulbourethral glands, and the prostate [11], cfsDNA should contain DNA epigenetic information of these organs. Moreover, these DNA epigenetic information should be undetectable in the blood, because DNA should not pass the physical barrier between the blood and the male reproduction system including blood-testis barrier and blood-epididymis barrier.

DNA epigenetic modifications are essential for spermatogenesis. Remethylation occurs from the prospermatogonia stage onwards and results in mature spermatozoa with an adequate DNA methylation pattern [12]. The methylation status of some genes is changed in some conditions that cause male infertility [13]. We presumed that the promoters of testis and epididymis-specific methylated genes in cfsDNA should be promising markers for male infertility, because most conditions with male infertility are disordered in spermatogenesis and sperm maturation [14, 15], which occur in testis and epididymis, respectively. In addition, environmental chemicals may cause spermatogenic defects and sperm motility abnormality via epigenetic changes [16, 17]. So we reasoned that the testis and epididymis-specific methylated promoters can also be used for revealing the epigenetic mechanism of male infertility by chemicals.

However, the epigenetic information of testis and epididymis in cfsDNA is still unclear. Although only 10% human ejaculate is secreted by testis and epididymis [11], we can still hope to detect DNA epigenetic information of testis and epididymis-specific methylated genes in semen. Firstly, germ cells undergo a high level of apoptosis and get into seminiferous tubule during spermatogenesis in testis, and the epithelium releases amounts of microvesicles into glandular lumen via apocrine secretion in epididymis. These characteristics may bring a large quantity of DNA from the testis and epididymis into the semen. Our previous study also indicated this possibility [9]. Secondly, many testis-specific methylated promoters were found in human testis [18–22].

The present study compared the genome-wide promoter methylation profiles of cfsDNA between healthy donors and vasectomized men. The differentially methylated promoters should be testis and epididymis-specific because the ejaculate of a successfully vasectomized man does not contain secretion from testis and epididymis. As a result, we determined for the first time the testis and epididymis-specific promoter methylation profile in cfsDNA, which may provide noninvasive epigenetic biomarkers for male infertility in humans.

Results

Quantity of cfsDNA in healthy subjects and vasectomized men

The ejaculate of a man with successfully post-vasectomy (PV) should not contain any secretion from the testis and epididymis. Successful vasectomy was confirmed by the absence of sperm in ejaculate and no detection of DDX4 mRNA in cell-free seminal RNA by RT-PCR [23]. In order to find whether there are a large amount of DNA originating from testis and epididymis in seminal plasma, we measured the cfsDNA concentration of healthy donors with normozoospermia (Nor) and men with PV. The averaged cfsDNA concentration of Nor (n = 12) was 1.23 ± 0.32 μg/ml seminal plasma, with ranges from 0.72 to 1.73 μg/ml. In contrast, the averaged cfsDNA concentration of PV (n = 11) was 0.33 ± 0.09 μg/ml seminal plasma, with ranges from 0.22 to 0.48 μg /ml. The averaged cfsDNA concentration of Nor was about quadruple of PV, which suggests more than 70% cfsDNA originates from testis and epididymis.

Genome-wide detection of the testis and epididymis-specific hypo- and hypermethylated promotors by Methyl-DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) microarray

High concentration of cfsDNA in human semen and high proportion of cfsDNA from testis and epididymis make it possible to identify the epigenetic information of cfsDNA derived from testis and epididymis. We examined the methylation profiles of 18,028 human promoters in the seminal plasma of Nor and PV with the NimbleGem HG18 Refseq promoter array. Finally, we identified 4111 promoters in the cfsDNA of Nor and PV. Comparative analysis of the data of 4111 promoter methylation peaks in Nor and PV, we found 9.71% was testis and epididymis-specific hypomethylated promoters, and 3.53% was testis and epididymis-specific hypermethylated promoters (Figure 1). The multiple promoters from the same gene were summarized. Finally, we found 367 testis and epididymis-specific hypomethylated genes, and 134 testis and epididymis-specific hypermethylated genes. All genes are listed in Additional file 1.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Number of the testis and epididymis-specific hypo- and hypermethylated promoters in cfsDNA. T/E refers to testis and epididymis-specific. The number on the top of each column denotes the quantity of promoters.

Considering the methylation peakscore value of promoters is associated with the probability of hypo- or hypermethylation, we summarized the distribution of peakscore value about the promoters of hypo- and hypermethylated genes so as to choose the reliable testis and epididymis-specific methylated promoters for the clinical research of male infertility. We found they showed the similar distribution (Figure 2). In the testis and epididymis-specific hypomethylated promoters, 63.41% of peakscore was between 3.0 and 3.5, and in the testis and epididymis-specific hypermethylated promoters, the percentage was 79.31%.
Figure 2
Figure 2

The distribution of methylation peakscore value about the testis and epididymis-specific methylated promoters in cfsDNA. The histogram indicates the distribution of testis and epididymis-specific hypo- and hypermethylated promoters according to the peakscore value, the number on the top of each column denotes the quantity of promoters in each range of peakscore value.

Validation of the MeDIP microarray results

To validate the dependability of MeDIP microarray data, the promoters of 10 testis and epididymis-specific methylated genes were analyzed by MeDIP-real time quantitative PCR, and of other 10 genes were analyzed by MethyLight. As shown in Figure 3, single-gene MeDIP result was concordant with the promoter methylation microarray, except for PEG10 and CLPB. The methylation level of GAPDH was less than 0.0026% in Nor and less than 0.0045% in PV. The methylation level of H19 was 59.30% in Nor and 43.47% in PV. MeDIP-real time quantitative PCR result is showed in Additional file 2. As for the other 10 promoters measured by MethyLight, nine promoters were successfully determined, except the failure of MCM10 amplification. Eight testis and epididymis-specific methylated promoters were consistent with the promoter array besides NCK2 (Additional file 3). In the detected 9 promoters, the difference of ΔCT between the unmethylated leukocyte DNA and fully methylated leukocyte DNA was all greater than 5.0. The result of MethyLight is showed in Additional file 4.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Comparing the methylation status of 10 promoters between NimbleGen HG18 Promoter Array (A) and MeDIP-real time quantitative PCR (B). A, The data of log2(IP/Input) graph shows the methylation signal intensity in the Promoter Array. The bars of upper row and lower row of lo2(IP/Input) graph in each amplifiable promoter fragments denote the methylation signal intensity of each probe in the cfsDNA of PV and Nor, respectively; B, MeDIP-real time quantitative PCR results. Each bar represents the methylation level of amplifiable promoter fragments analyzed by the relative quantity between IP and Input DNA.

The functions of testis and epididymis-specific hypo- and hypermethylated genes

Aiming to find the relationship between these testis and epididymis-specific methylated promoters and the biology of male reproduction, and suggest potential biomarkers for research and diagnosis of male infertility, Gene Ontology was used to analyze the biological processes and molecular functions of these genes. The most significant annotation clusters of enriched gene sets were inferred from functional annotation analysis with the testis and epididymis-specific hypo- or hypermethylated genes.

The biological processes of gene set analysis are shown in Tables 1 and 2. The testis and epididymis-specific hypomethylated genes were enriched for genes involved in sexual reproduction, ion transport, organic acid transport, negative regulation of transport, and defense response (Table 1). In contrast, the testis and epididymis specific hypermethylated genes were significantly related to regulation of cellular protein metabolic process, translation, cellular cation homeostasis, regulation of ubiquitin-protein ligase activity during mitotic cell cycle and regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor activity (Table 2).
Table 1

GO analysis of biological processes with testis and epididymis-specific hypomethylated genes

Gene Ontology Term (GO:ID)

Number of genes

ESa

Ion transport (GO:0006811)

21

1.19

Phosphorylation (GO:0016310)

21

1.05

Cell adhesion (GO:0007155)

20

1.28

Defense response (GO:0006952)

18

1.26

Protein complex biogenesis (GO:0070271)

15

1.12

Sexual reproduction (GO:0019953)

14

1.14

Ectoderm development (GO:0007398)

11

2.47

Nitrogen compound biosynthetic process (GO:0044271)

11

1.15

Sensory perception of light stimulus (GO:0050953)

9

1.37

Second-messenger-mediated signaling (GO:0019932)

9

1.20

Organic acid transport (GO:0015849)

7

1.28

Regulation of hormone levels (GO:0010817)

7

1.25

Muscle contraction (GO:0006936)

7

1.22

Negative regulation of transport (GO:0051051)

6

1.01

a ES stands for Enrichment Score value of GO identifiers (ID), it equals (−log10P). P stands for the significance testing value of GO ID.

Table 2

GO analysis of biological processes with testis and epididymis-specific hypermethylated genes

Gene Ontology Term (GO:ID)

Number of genes

ES

Cell surface receptor linked signal transduction (GO:0007166)

20

1.51

Sensory perception of smell (GO:0007608)

9

2.13

Regulation of cellular protein metabolic process (GO:0032268)

8

1.44

Translation (GO:0006412)

6

1.17

Cellular cation homeostasis (GO:0030003)

5

1.06

Regulation of ubiquitin-protein ligase activity during mitotic cell cycle (GO:0051437)

3

1.10

Regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor activity (GO:0007176)

2

1.03

The molecular functions are shown in Additional file 5 and Additional file 6, the testis and epididymis-specific hypomethylated genes were enriched for genes relevant to structural molecule activity, channel activity, calcium ion binding, cytokine activity (Additional file 5); the hypermethylated genes were enriched for genes correlated to RNA binding and peptidase activity (Additional file 6).

Discussion

The present study identified genome-wide testis and epididymis-specific promoter methylation information in cfsDNA, aiming to develop noninvasive epigenetic biomarkers for male infertility. For this purpose we compared promoter methylation profiles in the cfsDNA of Nor and PV. Overall, our results demonstrate that there are a number of promoters of testis and epididymis-specific hypo- and hypermethylated genes in cfsDNA, thus providing a foundation for developing noninvasive biomarkers for studying the epigenetic mechanism and clinical diagnosis of male infertility, of which most conditions are impaired testicular spermatogenesis and epididymal sperm maturation.

In our study, the semen samples of successful vasectomy are indispensable, because these samples do not contain DNA originating from testis and epididymis owing to the ligation of vas deferens, which makes it possible to screen the testis or epididymis-specific methylated promoters. Although several previous studies reported that vasectomy could change the mRNA and protein expression of epididymis and impair the spermatogenesis of testis and induce aberrant DNA methylation at imprinted genes in testicular sperm [24–27], there are no reports in the literature describing the change of DNA methylation status in human seminal vesicles, bulbourethral glands and the prostate after vasectomy. Therefore, comparative analysis of promoter methylation information in the cfsDNA of Nor and PV can identify variations in methylation profiles at promoter regions and thus identifies promoters that are likely testis and epididymis tissue specific and potential biomarkers for male fertility.

Another rationale for identification testis and epididymis-specific methylated promoters is the high contribution of releasing or secretion of these organs to cfsDNA concentration. We previously found that concentration of cfsDNA is much higher than other body fluids, and proposed the high contribution of testicular apoptosis to cfsDNA [9]. In the present study, averaged cfsDNA concentration in Nor was about quadruple of PV, indicating that cfsDNA is mostly originated from testis and epididymis. Considering spontaneous apoptosis happens in 75% of germ cell, which would develop to mature spermatozoa in mammalian, and the renewal of epididymal epithelium is slow [28, 29], it is more likely that the apoptosis of germ cell in testis is the primary origin of cfsDNA from testis and epididymis.

Moreover, to ensure the reliability of testis and epididymis-specific methylated promoters identified by promoter methylation profile, we excluded some factors influencing the methylation profile of cfsDNA and kept the control subjects and vasectomized donors as matched as possible. Some previous studies reported that aberrant DNA methylation occurred in distinct diseases [30]. In addition, environmental chemicals [16, 17], age [31] and lifestyle factors [32] can also affect the DNA methylation of human tissues. Therefore, to meet inclusion criteria, both Nor and PV groups were screened for potential confounding conditions such as inflammation of reproduction organs, genetic disease, potential occupational exposure, obesity and smoking and excess alcohol consumption.

By the microarray of promoter methylation, we identified the promoters of 367 testis and epididymis-specific hypomethylated genes and 134 testis and epididymis-specific hypermethylated genes. Comparing our result with other studies about DNA methylation information of human testis, we can determine some testis-specific methylated genes. Currently, only one study has globally analyzed the human testis-specific promoter methylation to identify testis-specific hypomethylated genes [18]. Totally 12 genes with promoter hypomethylation in this report are found in our results. Among them, MORC1 is related to spermatogenesis [33]; ELF5 is involved in cell proliferation [34]; PRAME is associated with the regulation of apoptosis [35]; SPACA3 is correlated to the sperm-egg recognition [36]. But some testis-specific hypomethylated genes are inconsistent with our result. It may be mainly due to the differences in the comparison and source of DNA. The previous report [18] compared DNAs between testis and other tissues, whereas we compared cfsDNA between vasectomized men and healthy donors. In addition, the testicular DNA originates from spermatogenic cells, Sertoli cell and Leydig cell. However, testis and epididymis-specific cfsDNA should be mainly released by the apoptotic germ cells including spermatogonia, spermatocytes and spermatids [37], and epididymal epithelium. Some testis and epididymis-specific hypomethylated genes relevant to the spermatogenesis in our result, such as DNMT3L, HSF1, MSH4, THEG, SOHLH1 and CIB1[38], cannot be found in the methylation profile of testis tissue owing to the interference of Sertoli cell and Leydig cell [18]. Some other reports studied promoter methylation of individual genes in testis [19, 20]. Our result confirmed the testis-specific hypomethylated genes including MAGEA1[19] and ANKRD30A[20].

The result of single-gene MeDIP-real time quantitative PCR and MethyLight analysis confirmed the reliability of our microarray data. Among the 19 promoters which were successfully determined, sixteen are consistent with the result of promoter methylation microarray. The other 3 promoters tested as false positives on the microarray, which may be due to the possibly inefficient or non-specific detection of individual probes on the microarray and normalization artifacts during data processing. The failure of measurement of MCM10 may be due to the inappropriate primers and probe. Several previous studies concurred with our result of single-gene MeDIP and MethyLight analysis: the hypomethylated promoters of CLPB, PRAME, DAZ1 MORC1, and NCK2 were confirmed in human testis [18]; the hypomethylated promoters of HOXA5, GML, PEG10 and SNURF were identified in human sperm [15, 39]. Methylation level of H19 in single-gene MeDIP analysis is lower than human spermatocytes and spermatid, but it is similar with spermatogonia and somatic cell [40], which suggests that most of H19 in cfsDNA originates from the spermatogonia and epithelial cell of male reproduction organs.

To further understand the potential function of testis and epididymis-specific hypo- and hypermethylated genes, and apply these potential epigenetic markers, we carried out Gene Ontology analysis with the testis and epididymis-specific hypomethylated genes and hypermethylated genes, respectively. Out of the biological processes of testis and epididymis-specific hypomethylated genes, it is obviously that sexual reproduction is consistent with the function of testis because the process of spermatogenesis takes place in testis and involves the development of mitotically growing spermatogonia into meiotic spermatocytes that give rise to haploid spermatids, and subsequently differentiate into mature sperm [41]. Other biological processes, such as ion transport, organic acid transport and negative regulation of transport, participate in the reabsorption and excretion of epididymis [14], the biological process of defense response may protect the sperm from outside bacterial invasion in epididymis [42]. On the other hand, the biological processes of testis and epididymis-specific hypermethylated genes involve in regulation of cellular protein metabolic process, regulation of ubiquitin-protein ligase activity during mitotic cell cycle and regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor activity, which may be the apoptotic inducement of spermatogenic cell because of either low expression or silence of these hypermethylated genes.

Conclusion

Taken together, we have firstly identified the genome-wide testis and epididymis-specific hypo- and hypermethylated promoters in cfsDNA. Totally 367 hypomethylated gene promoters and 134 hypermethylated gene promoters were proposed as testis and epididymis-specific, and can be detected in cfsDNA. The methylation modification of testis or epididymis-specific promoters is important for the spermatogenesis and sperm mature [12], and the aberrant methylation change of these promoters correlates with male infertility, carcinogenesis and development [12, 16, 17, 43]. Therefore, the genome-wide testis or epididymis-specific methylated promoters in cfsDNA can be used as the potential epigenetic biomarkers for noninvasive study and diagnosis of male infertility, and the tumor of testis and epididymis.

Methods

Semen samples

All normozoospermic semen samples (n = 12) were collected from specimens remaining after routine andrological analysis. PV semen samples were acquired from adults (n = 11) who underwent vasectomy within 5 years. PV was confirmed by the absence of sperm in ejaculate and no detection of DDX4 mRNA in cell-free seminal RNA by RT-PCR [23]. PV semen with any abnormal parameter other than sperm amounts was excluded. The semen criteria for Nor were according to guidelines of WHO (World Health Organization) [44]. The inclusion subjects for each group were 28-40 years old, the Han nationality, smoking <2 pack per year and intaking of alcohol <1 drink per week, body mass index between 18.5 and 24. All individuals had no family history of genetic diseases, history of autoimmune disorders, malignancy, hyperpyrexia, sexually transmitted diseases or inflammation of reproductive organs. Individuals who worked in high temperature environments or had occupational exposure to toxic chemicals or radiation were also excluded. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board, and all participants provided written informed consent. Semen specimens were obtained by masturbation after 3-5 days of sexual abstinence and were allowed to liquefy for 30-60 min at room temperature.

CfsDNA isolation and fragmentation

Seminal plasma was obtained by low speed centrifugation (400 × g for 10 min) to avoid cell lyses and then centrifuged again at 12, 000 × g for 10 min. The supernatant was carefully collected and subjected to cfsDNA extraction, which was performed as our previous described [9]. To obtain enough cfsDNA, 2.4 ml seminal plasma in every sample of 8 control subjects and 7 vasectomized men was abstracted. Concentration and purity of DNA were detected by an ultraviolet photometer (Biometra, Göttingen, Germany). DNA size distribution was detected using agarose gel electrophoresis. To reach the requirement of DNA quantity in promoter methylation microarray, and avoid individual variation, cfsDNA from 6 Nor and 6 PV were combined to make “Nor” and “PV” pools, respectively. Concentration of DNA was assessed by spectrophotometry for MeDIP. Ultrasonication to a mean fragment size of 200-500 bp was carried out with the bioruptor (Diagenode) using the following settings: Bioruptor on low, sonication for 10 cycles of 30 sec on and 30 sec off, and 5 μg DNA in 300 μl TE buffer. Fragment range was controlled using agarose gel electrophoresis.

MeDIP and microarray hybridization

MeDIP was performed as previous described with some modification [45]. Briefly, 4 μg of fragmented DNA was used for a standard MeDIP assay. After denaturation at 95°C for 10 min, immunoprecipitation was performed using 4 μg mouse monoclonal antibody against 5-methylcytidine (1 μg/μl, Diagenode) in a final volume of 500 μl IP buffer (0.5% NP40, 1.1% Triton X-100, 1.5 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl) at 4°C for 12 h. Immunoprecipitated complexes were collected with magnetic beads (Bangs laboratories. Inc) coupled anti-mouse IgG (1 μg/μl, Jackson) at 4°C for 2 h, washed with IP buffer for five times. DNA was purified by phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation.

The Input and IP DNA were labeled with cy3- and cy5-labeled random nonamers, respectively. Labeled DNA from the Input and IP pools was mixed (Input/IP =1:1, 2 μg) and hybridized to NimbleGem HG18 Refseq promoter array (Roche, Germany), which contained all known well-characterized 18028 RefSeq promoter regions [(from about -2200 bp to +500 bp of the transcription start sites] totally covered by 385, 000 probes. Arrays were then washed and scanned with Axon GenePix 4000B microarray scanner. The raw data was abstracted as pair files by NimbleScan v2.5 (Roche-NimbleGen) software. After normalization, raw data was inputted into SignalMap software (v1.9, Roche-NimbleGen) to observe and evaluate the differential methylation peaks between Nor and PV cfsDNA.

A customized peak-finding algorithm supplied by NimbleGen was using to analyze methylation data from MeDIP-microarray (NimbleScan v2.5; Roche-Nimble-Gen) as previously described [46]. After scaled log2(IP/Input) data was generated, the modified algorithm was applied to carry out the one-sided Kolmogorov-Smirnov test on several adjacent probes using sliding windows to predict enriched regions across the microarray. The algorithm was set with specified parameters [sliding window width, 750 bp; minimal probes per peak, 2; P value (after -log10 transformation) minimum cutoff, 2; maximum spacing between nearby probes within peak, 500 bp] [47]. Then, the identified methylation peaks were mapped to genomic transcripts. Processed data was imported into microsoft office excel 2003 for further analysis. Promoters with significant methylation change were revealed according to the difference of methylation peaks in the cfsDNA of Nor and PV.

Criteria for seminal promoters derived from testis and epididymis

The candidates of seminal promoters derived from testis and epididymis were selected based on the followong criteria: the peakscore value (-log10p) of testis and epididymis-specific hypomethylated promoters is more than 3.0 (P < 0.001) in the vasectomized men and less than 2.0 (P > 0.01) in the Nor donors; on the contrary, the peakscore value of testis and epididymis-specific hypermethylated promoters is more than 3.0 in the Nor donors and less than 2.0 in the vasectomized men. These promoters with obviously differential peakscore in Nor and PV are supposed to be released or secreted from testis and epididymis, because the ejaculate of a successfully vasectomized men does not contain secretion from testis and epididymis.

Real-time quantitative PCR

Primers were designed using primer 5.0 and beacon designer 7.0 software and the quality was controlled by PCR and BLAT functions of the UCSC Genome Browser (http://genome.ucsc.edu/). Enrichment of a specific fragment in the MeDIP eluate was detected and quantified relative to the Input DNA by real-time quantitative PCR on an Mx3000P thermocycler (Stratagene) using the SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ II (TaKaRa Code: DRR820A) according to the manufacturer’s description. We used GAPDH as the negative control and H19 as the positive control to certificate the specificity of MeDIP because GAPDH promoter is normally unmethylated and H19 promoter is normally 100% methylation in spermatid and 50% methylation in somatic cells [40]. Primer sequences were given in Additional file 7 and the positional relationship of primer, methylation peak and transcript start site in 10 genes selected for validation was shown in Table 3. Cycling conditions were as follows: denaturation (95°C for 30 sec), amplification and quantification (95°C for 5 sec, 58°C for 20 sec, 72°C for 20 sec with a single fluorescence measurement at the end of segment) repeated 40 times, a melting curve program (60-95°C with a heating rate of 0.1°C/sec and continuous fluorescence measurement) and a cooling step to 4°C.
Table 3

The positional relationship of primer, methylation peak and transcript start site (TSS) in genes selected for validation

Gene

Gene name

GeneBank accession no.

Primer location(5′-3′)

Peak location

Strand

Position(TSS = +1)

Forword

Reverse

Forword 5′

Reverse 5′

PRAME

Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma

NM_206956

chr22:21231279

chr22:21231496

chr22:21231050

-

251

54

−21231299

−21231479

−21231499

PEG10

Paternally expressed 10

NM_015068

chr7:94124064

chr7:94124274

chr7:94123914

+

492

702

−94124086

−94124252

−94124663

MORC1

MORC family CW-type zinc finger 1

NM_014429

chr3:110319361

chr3:110319519

chr3:110319258

-

322

164

−110319381

−110319495

−110320007

GML

Glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchored molecule like protein

NM_002066

chr8:143913400

chr8:143913599

chr8:143912618

+

182

381

−143913419

−143913577

−143913667

HOXA5

Homeobox A5

NM_019102

chr7:27150841

chr7:27151029

chr7:27150312

-

−1029

−1217

−27150862

−27151008

−27151961

DNMT3L

DNA(cytosine-5-)- methyltransferase 3-like

NM_175867

chr21:44506322

chr21:44506560

chr21:44506027

-

205

−33

−44506343

−44506540

−44508076

SNURF

SNRPN upstream reading frame

NM_005678

chr15:22751295

chr15:22751430

chr15:22751327

+

68

203

−22751314

−22751410

−22751676

MSH4

MutS homolog 4

NM_002440

chr1:76035117

chr1:76035360

chr1:76035117

+

−100

143

−76035135

−76035338

−76035566

DAZ1

Deleted in azoospermia 1

NM_004081

chrY:23754371

chrY:23754582

chrY:23754045

-

256

45

−23754389

−23754560

−23754994

CLPB

Caseinolytic peptidase B homolog

NM_030813

chr11:71824486

chr11:71824650

chr11:71823916

-

−1270

−1434

−71824504

−71824631

−71824774

The methylation level of selected promoters in cfsDNA is calculated according to the relative quantity of MeDIP DNA to Input DNA in amplified fragments. Computing the relative quantity of each MeDIP DNA fraction to Input DNA requires to account for the difference of concentration in prepared DNA samples, so the percentage of IP/Input = 2-[Ct(IP)–Ct(Input)] × (dilution factor of Input DNA) × 100% (Ct, cycle threshold). The size of products was identified by electrophoretically separated on 2.0% agarose gels.

Bisulfite treatment of cfsDNA and MethyLight analysis

The seminal cfsDNA of 4 Nor and 4 PV was recovered as our previous described [9]. Sodium bisulfite conversion of cfsDNA was performed using EpiTect Bisulfite (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Following sodium bisulfite conversion, cfsDNA was analyzed using the MethyLight technique [48]. The primers and probe for β-ACTIN were previously reported [49], which served as a reference to normalize the quantity of input DNA. The other 10 sets of primers and probes, which were designed specifically by beacon designer 7.0 for bisulfite-converted cfsDNA, were used to detect the methylation level of testis and epididymis-specific hypo- or hypermethylated promoters. The sequences of primers and probes are given in Additional file 8. Specificity of the reactions for methylated DNA was confirmed separately using M.SssI-treated human leukocyte DNA (NEB, M0226L, USA) and unmethylated leukocyte DNA. TaqMan PCRs with primers and probe specific for the bisulfite-converted methylated promoter sequence of a particular locus and with the β-ACTIN reference primers and probe were performed separately. The percentage of methylation at a specific locus is to be 2-ΔΔCt × 100%, where ΔΔCT = (CTTarget-CTReference)sample-(CTTarget -CTReference)fully methylated DNA [50].

Annotation of the testis and epididymis-specific hypo- and hypermethylated genes

For exploring potential shared functional of testis and epididymis-specific hypo- and hypermethylated genes, we used Gene Ontology (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/summary.jsp) from Functional Annotation Tools (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/tools.jsp) for Gene Ontology analysis and identified the statistical significance of the overlap with each Gene Ontology functional category using the Fisher exact test. Benjamini-Hochberg multiple testing correction was used to control false discovery rate, and the genes were classified into three main categories: cellular component, biological process, and molecular function.

Abbreviations

cfsDNA: 

Cell-free seminal DNA

MeDIP: 

Methyl-DNA immunoprecipitation

PV: 

Post-vasectomy

Nor: 

Normozoospermia.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the participants enrolled in this study and the personnel of Family Planning Service Center Qichun County for their collaboration. This work was supported by grants no. 20090142110034 from the Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Education Ministry of china and no. 2012BAI32B03 from the 12th Five-Year Plan of National Science and Technology in China.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Family Planning Research Institute/Center of Reproductive Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
(2)
Centre of Reproductive Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
(3)
Wuhan Tongji Reproductive Medicine Hospital, Wuhan, 430013, China

References

  1. Rykova EY, Morozkin ES, Ponomaryova AA, Loseva EM, Zaporozhchenko IA, Cherdyntseva NV, Vlassov VV, Laktionov PP: Cell-free and cell-bound circulating nucleic acid complexes: mechanisms of generation, concentration and content. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2012, 12 (Suppl 1): S141-S153.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Schwarzenbach H, Hoon DS, Pantel K: Cell-free nucleic acids as biomarkers in cancer patients. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011, 11 (6): 426-437. 10.1038/nrc3066.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Spindler KL, Pallisgaard N, Vogelius I, Jakobsen A: Quantitative cell-free DNA, KRAS, and BRAF mutations in plasma from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer during treatment with cetuximab and irinotecan. Clin Cancer Res: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2012, 18 (4): 1177-1185. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0564.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Chan KC, Lai PB, Mok TS, Chan HL, Ding C, Yeung SW, Lo YM: Quantitative analysis of circulating methylated DNA as a biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Chem. 2008, 54 (9): 1528-1536. 10.1373/clinchem.2008.104653.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Zancan M, Galdi F, Di Tonno F, Mazzariol C, Orlando C, Malentacchi F, Agostini M, Maran M, Del Bianco P, Fabricio AS: Evaluation of cell-free DNA in urine as a marker for bladder cancer diagnosis. Int J Biol Markers. 2009, 24 (3): 147-155.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Yao K, Honarmand S, Espinosa A, Akhyani N, Glaser C, Jacobson S: Detection of human herpesvirus-6 in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with encephalitis. Ann Neurol. 2009, 65 (3): 257-267. 10.1002/ana.21611.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Carstensen T, Schmidt B, Engel E, Jandrig B, Witt C, Fleischhacker M: Detection of cell-free DNA in bronchial lavage fluid supernatants of patients with lung cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004, 1022: 202-210. 10.1196/annals.1318.031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hui L, Bianchi DW: Cell-free fetal nucleic acids in amniotic fluid. Hum Reprod Update. 2011, 17 (3): 362-371. 10.1093/humupd/dmq049.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Li HG, Huang SY, Zhou H, Liao AH, Xiong CL: Quick recovery and characterization of cell-free DNA in seminal plasma of normozoospermia and azoospermia: implications for non-invasive genetic utilities. Asian J Androl. 2009, 11 (6): 703-709. 10.1038/aja.2009.65.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chou JS, Jacobson JD, Patton WC, King A, Chan PJ: Modified isocratic capillary electrophoresis detection of cell-free DNA in semen. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2004, 21 (11): 397-400. 10.1007/s10815-004-7527-6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Robert M, Gagnon C: Sperm motility inhibitor from human seminal plasma: presence of a precursor molecule in seminal vesicle fluid and its molecular processing after ejaculation. Int J Androl. 1994, 17 (5): 232-240. 10.1111/j.1365-2605.1994.tb01248.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Poplinski A, Tuttelmann F, Kanber D, Horsthemke B, Gromoll J: Idiopathic male infertility is strongly associated with aberrant methylation of MEST and IGF2/H19 ICR1. Int J Androl. 2010, 33 (4): 642-649.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Rajender S, Avery K, Agarwal A: Epigenetics, spermatogenesis and male infertility. Mutat Res. 2011, 727 (3): 62-71. 10.1016/j.mrrev.2011.04.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cornwall GA: New insights into epididymal biology and function. Hum Reprod Update. 2009, 15 (2): 213-227.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Houshdaran S, Cortessis VK, Siegmund K, Yang A, Laird PW, Sokol RZ: Widespread epigenetic abnormalities suggest a broad DNA methylation erasure defect in abnormal human sperm. PLoS One. 2007, 2 (12): e1289-10.1371/journal.pone.0001289.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Oakes CC, Kelly TL, Robaire B, Trasler JM: Adverse effects of 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine on spermatogenesis include reduced sperm function and selective inhibition of de novo DNA methylation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007, 322 (3): 1171-1180. 10.1124/jpet.107.121699.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Anway MD, Cupp AS, Uzumcu M, Skinner MK: Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors and male fertility. Science. 2005, 308 (5727): 1466-1469. 10.1126/science.1108190.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Schilling E, Rehli M: Global, comparative analysis of tissue-specific promoter CpG methylation. Genomics. 2007, 90 (3): 314-323. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2007.04.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. De Smet C, Lurquin C, Lethe B, Martelange V, Boon T: DNA methylation is the primary silencing mechanism for a set of germ line- and tumor-specific genes with a CpG-rich promoter. Mol Cell Biol. 1999, 19 (11): 7327-7335.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Shen L, Kondo Y, Guo Y, Zhang J, Zhang L, Ahmed S, Shu J, Chen X, Waterland RA, Issa JP: Genome-wide profiling of DNA methylation reveals a class of normally methylated CpG island promoters. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3 (10): 2023-2036.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Igarashi J, Muroi S, Kawashima H, Wang X, Shinojima Y, Kitamura E, Oinuma T, Nemoto N, Song F, Ghosh S: Quantitative analysis of human tissue-specific differences in methylation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008, 376 (4): 658-664. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.09.044.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kitamura E, Igarashi J, Morohashi A, Hida N, Oinuma T, Nemoto N, Song F, Ghosh S, Held WA, Yoshida-Noro C: Analysis of tissue-specific differentially methylated regions (TDMs) in humans. Genomics. 2007, 89 (3): 326-337. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2006.11.006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Li H, Wu C, Gu X, Xiong C: A novel application of cell-free seminal mRNA: non-invasive identification of the presence of germ cells or complete obstruction in men with azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 2012, 27 (4): 991-997. 10.1093/humrep/der481.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Legare C, Boudreau L, Thimon V, Thabet M, Sullivan R: Vasectomy affects cysteine-rich secretory protein expression along the human epididymis and its association with ejaculated spermatozoa following vasectomy surgical reversal. J Androl. 2010, 31 (6): 573-583. 10.2164/jandrol.109.009860.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Thimon V, Calvo E, Koukoui O, Legare C, Sullivan R: Effects of vasectomy on gene expression profiling along the human epididymis. Biol Reprod. 2008, 79 (2): 262-273. 10.1095/biolreprod.107.066449.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. McVicar CM, O’Neill DA, McClure N, Clements B, McCullough S, Lewis SE: Effects of vasectomy on spermatogenesis and fertility outcome after testicular sperm extraction combined with ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2005, 20 (10): 2795-2800. 10.1093/humrep/dei138.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Minor A, Chow V, Ma S: Aberrant DNA methylation at imprinted genes in testicular sperm retrieved from men with obstructive azoospermia and undergoing vasectomy reversal. Reproduction. 2011, 141 (6): 749-757. 10.1530/REP-11-0008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Baum JS, St George JP, McCall K: Programmed cell death in the germline. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2005, 16 (2): 245-259. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2004.12.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Clermont Y, Flannery J: Mitotic activity in the epithelium of the epididymis in young and old adult rats. Biol Reprod. 1970, 3 (3): 283-292.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Heyn H, Esteller M: DNA methylation profiling in the clinic: applications and challenges. Nat Rev Genet. 2012, 13 (10): 679-692. 10.1038/nrg3270.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Irier HA, Jin P: Dynamics of DNA methylation in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. DNA Cell Biol. 2012, 31 (Suppl 1): S42-S48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Alegria-Torres JA, Baccarelli A, Bollati V: Epigenetics and lifestyle. Epigenomics. 2011, 3 (3): 267-277. 10.2217/epi.11.22.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Inoue N, Hess KD, Moreadith RW, Richardson LL, Handel MA, Watson ML, Zinn AR: New gene family defined by MORC, a nuclear protein required for mouse spermatogenesis. Hum Mol Genet. 1999, 8 (7): 1201-1207. 10.1093/hmg/8.7.1201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhou J, Chehab R, Tkalcevic J, Naylor MJ, Harris J, Wilson TJ, Tsao S, Tellis I, Zavarsek S, Xu D: Elf5 is essential for early embryogenesis and mammary gland development during pregnancy and lactation. EMBO J. 2005, 24 (3): 635-644. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600538.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Tanaka N, Wang YH, Shiseki M, Takanashi M, Motoji T: Inhibition of PRAME expression causes cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in leukemic cells. Leuk Res. 2011, 35 (9): 1219-1225. 10.1016/j.leukres.2011.04.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Herrero MB, Mandal A, Digilio LC, Coonrod SA, Maier B, Herr JC: Mouse SLLP1, a sperm lysozyme-like protein involved in sperm-egg binding and fertilization. Dev Biol. 2005, 284 (1): 126-142. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.05.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Hikim AP, Wang C, Lue Y, Johnson L, Wang XH, Swerdloff RS: Spontaneous germ cell apoptosis in humans: evidence for ethnic differences in the susceptibility of germ cells to programmed cell death. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 1998, 83 (1): 152-156. 10.1210/jc.83.1.152.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Matzuk MM, Lamb DJ: The biology of infertility: research advances and clinical challenges. Nat Med. 2008, 14 (11): 1197-1213. 10.1038/nm.f.1895.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Pacheco SE, Houseman EA, Christensen BC, Marsit CJ, Kelsey KT, Sigman M, Boekelheide K: Integrative DNA methylation and gene expression analyses identify DNA packaging and epigenetic regulatory genes associated with low motility sperm. PLoS One. 2011, 6 (6): e20280-10.1371/journal.pone.0020280.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kerjean A, Dupont JM, Vasseur C, Le Tessier D, Cuisset L, Paldi A, Jouannet P, Jeanpierre M: Establishment of the paternal methylation imprint of the human H19 and MEST/PEG1 genes during spermatogenesis. Hum Mol Genet. 2000, 9 (14): 2183-2187. 10.1093/hmg/9.14.2183.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Zamudio NM, Chong S, O’Bryan MK: Epigenetic regulation in male germ cells. Reproduction. 2008, 136 (2): 131-146. 10.1530/REP-07-0576.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Dube E, Chan PT, Hermo L, Cyr DG: Gene expression profiling and its relevance to the blood-epididymal barrier in the human epididymis. Biol Reprod. 2007, 76 (6): 1034-1044. 10.1095/biolreprod.106.059246.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Lind GE, Skotheim RI, Lothe RA: The epigenome of testicular germ cell tumors. APMIS: acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica. 2007, 115 (10): 1147-1160. 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2007.apm_660.xml.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. World Health Organization: WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 2010, Switzerland: WHO PressGoogle Scholar
  45. Ruike Y, Imanaka Y, Sato F, Shimizu K, Tsujimoto G: Genome-wide analysis of aberrant methylation in human breast cancer cells using methyl-DNA immunoprecipitation combined with high-throughput sequencing. BMC Genomics. 2010, 11: 137-10.1186/1471-2164-11-137.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Palmke N, Santacruz D, Walter J: Comprehensive analysis of DNA-methylation in mammalian tissues using MeDIP-chip. Methods. 2011, 53 (2): 175-184. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2010.07.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Yan XJ, Xu J, Gu ZH, Pan CM, Lu G, Shen Y, Shi JY, Zhu YM, Tang L, Zhang XW: Exome sequencing identifies somatic mutations of DNA methyltransferase gene DNMT3A in acute monocytic leukemia. Nat Genet. 2011, 43 (4): 309-315. 10.1038/ng.788.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Eads CA, Danenberg KD, Kawakami K, Saltz LB, Blake C, Shibata D, Danenberg PV, Laird PW: MethyLight: a high-throughput assay to measure DNA methylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28 (8): E32-10.1093/nar/28.8.e32.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Prabhu JS, Wahi K, Korlimarla A, Correa M, Manjunath S, Raman N, Srinath BS, Sridhar TS: The epigenetic silencing of the estrogen receptor (ER) by hypermethylation of the ESR1 promoter is seen predominantly in triple-negative breast cancers in Indian women. Tumour Biology: the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine. 2012, 33 (2): 315-323. 10.1007/s13277-012-0343-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001, 25 (4): 402-408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Wu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us