Skip to main content

Characterization of hemizygous deletions in Citrus using array-Comparative Genomic Hybridization and microsynteny comparisons with the poplar genome



Many fruit-tree species, including relevant Citrus spp varieties exhibit a reproductive biology that impairs breeding and strongly constrains genetic improvements. In citrus, juvenility increases the generation time while sexual sterility, inbreeding depression and self-incompatibility prevent the production of homozygous cultivars. Genomic technology may provide citrus researchers with a new set of tools to address these various restrictions. In this work, we report a valuable genomics-based protocol for the structural analysis of deletion mutations on an heterozygous background.


Two independent fast neutron mutants of self-incompatible clementine (Citrus clementina Hort. Ex Tan. cv. Clemenules) were the subject of the study. Both mutants, named 39B3 and 39E7, were expected to carry DNA deletions in hemizygous dosage. Array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization (array-CGH) using a Citrus cDNA microarray allowed the identification of underrepresented genes in these two mutants. Subsequent comparison of citrus deleted genes with annotated plant genomes, especially poplar, made possible to predict the presence of a large deletion in 39B3 of about 700 kb and at least two deletions of approximately 100 and 500 kb in 39E7. The deletion in 39B3 was further characterized by PCR on available Citrus BACs, which helped us to build a partial physical map of the deletion. Among the deleted genes, ClpC-like gene coding for a putative subunit of a multifunctional chloroplastic protease involved in the regulation of chlorophyll b synthesis was directly related to the mutated phenotype since the mutant showed a reduced chlorophyll a/b ratio in green tissues.


In this work, we report the use of array-CGH for the successful identification of genes included in a hemizygous deletion induced by fast neutron irradiation on Citrus clementina. The study of gene content and order into the 39B3 deletion also led to the unexpected conclusion that microsynteny and local gene colinearity in this species were higher with Populus trichocarpa than with the phylogenetically closer Arabidopsis thaliana. This work corroborates the potential of Citrus genomic resources to assist mutagenesis-based approaches for functional genetics, structural studies and comparative genomics, and hence to facilitate citrus variety improvement.


The rapid increase of world population, the field degradation by soil salinization and erosion, and the likely fluctuations in climate caused by global warming will pose new and known challenges to agriculture during this century [1]. Crop improvements required to cope with these challenges could be attained through agronomic advances, leading to a better use of fertilizers, protection agents or soil rescue, and exploitation of recent technologies for plant breeding. Despite the outstanding importance of genetics-based breeding applied to spontaneous mutations and conventional hybrids, molecular and genomic tools are expected to develop their great potential for crop improvement through functional genetics analysis, involving gene and function discovery and genome modification.

Citrus, some of the most important fruit crops worldwide, are perennial trees requiring a juvenility period of several years and frequently are parthenocarpic and sexually self-incompatible [2, 3], which considerably impairs traditional breeding. Genomic technology, including methods to rapidly identify and manipulate genes of agricultural interest, holds promise of improvements that may be difficult through traditional approaches. In recent years, Citrus has been the target of several genomic developments including large EST collections [47], cDNA and oligonucleotide-based microarrays [4, 8, 9], BAC libraries and BAC end sequencing (BES) (to be published). However, functional studies, i.e. genetic transformation and the capability to perform reverse genetic analyses, are also considerably impaired. In citrus, high throughput transgenic programs such as the generation of RNA interference knockouts, activation tagging through enhancer elements, gene-trap T-DNA insertions, or transposon tagging systems have not been developed yet. Since no efficient tagging or insertional procedures are available in these species, other gene disruption methods including strategies based on genome-wide mutagenesis such as TILLING and fast neutron mutagenesis have been initiated. These approaches are non-transgenic and may have particular interest for the industry where the debate on genetically modified organisms has restricted application of these technologies to crop improvement. Both approaches, however, are of limited usefulness as strategies for reverse genetics because of the lack of knowledge on Citrus genomic sequence and the large amount of space required for the establishment of mutant populations. ECOTILLING on natural citrus variants and microarray-based detection of deletions in fast neutron citrus mutants are apparently very straightforward approaches. In this work we explore the potential of this last idea using two fast neutron Citrus clementina hemizygous mutants from the IVIA collection and a 20K cDNA citrus microarray.

Physical mutagenesis through fast neutron irradiation has been reported to cause variable genomic deletions ranging in size from few base pairs to 12 kb in Arabidopsis thaliana [10, 11]. Several approaches have been used to characterize plant genomic deletions at the molecular level. These mostly include positional cloning [12], a method applicable to any kind of genetic lesion that, however, needs highly saturated genetic maps; PCR-based reverse genetics techniques [11, 13], requiring a previous considerable knowledge of genomic sequence; and genomic subtraction procedures [1416], which do not need sequence information but are strongly dependent on the gene dosage. Since very little is known about Citrus genome sequence and the Citrus induced deletions are in hemizygous gene dosage, an array-based procedure as the one employed for identifying homozygous gene deletions in Arabidopsis [17] seems more suitable for our purpose than those methods. Although the main application of microarrays is transcriptome profiling analysis, microarrays can also be used to study DNA variation. Oligonucleotide arrays are particularly suited for the detection of single nucleotide mismatches during hybridization, and hence for the discovery of novel DNA variants or the determination of known variants. The origin of this technique relies on a cytogenetic method described 25 years ago named "Comparative Genomic Hybridization" (CGH) that used differential DNA hybridization on chromosome spreads for visualization of deleted or amplified genomic regions in tumour tissues [18]. Subsequently, different laboratories mostly working on cancer research independently applied microarray technology to genomic DNA hybridization procedure, a technique consequently named array-CGH [1923]. Array-CGH was successfully utilized to detect gene duplications in Arabidopsis and rice [24], and to validate aneuploidy analysis performed by quantitative fluorescent PCR in Arabidopsis [25]. Therefore, this method has proven to be suitable to study chromosomal imbalances in plants.

For the characterization of the deleted regions we also leaned on comparative genomics with other dicots since available physical citrus maps are not yet integrated with known genetic maps. Comparative genomics takes advantage of available information on gene content and order in genomic DNA from different species to infer phylogenetic relationships and formulate hypotheses on DNA evolutionary dynamics. Whole genomes are preferentially compared when available, but more often relatively short stretches of DNA or polymorphic markers are used.

The main objective of this work was to identify deleted genes on a heterozygous genetic Citrus background, provided by fast neutron generated mutants, through array-Comparative Genomic Hybridization. In addition, we also explored the possibility of using comparative genomics with annotated dicot genomes assisted by BAC end sequencing for the generation of partial physical maps of the deleted Citrus regions.

Results and discussion

Procedure for the characterization of hemizygous deletions in Citrus

The proposed procedure to identify deleted genes is illustrated in Figure 1 and its potential to structurally characterize hemizygous deletions is exemplified below with Citrus mutants as starting plant material. Its usefulness to describe genomic deletions in other species might be dependent upon genome complexity and ploidy. This method uses cDNA microarrays to hybridize genomic DNA extracted from the deletion mutants to render a list of underrepresented genes. The putative deleted genes are then validated through gene dosage evaluation by real-time PCR using gene specific primers. Deleted genes could subsequently contribute to the identification of the molecular mechanisms underlying the observed phenotypes by means of a candidate gene approach, validated by physiological analyses or genetic transformation [26]. In non-sequenced genomes or in plants with poorly developed physical maps, further characterization of deletions at the structural level requires TBLASTX similarity searches against databases containing the sequence annotation of known eudicot genomes, such as Arabidopsis thaliana, Populus trichocarpa and Vitis vinifera. These searches yield putative orthologous genes and syntenic genomic regions between these four species. Local physical maps of deletions are built allocating the deleted gene sequences and the syntenic genomic fragments from these other eudicots into a BES database of the species of interest. Lastly, specific PCR on the array of BACs confirms gene content and order on the lineal structure of the deletions. The results may also be used in comparative genomics analyses to study evolutionary dynamics and phylogenetics.

Figure 1

Schematic guidelines for the characterization of hemizygous deletion Citrus mutants. Arrows indicate successive steps of mutant characterization. Plant material and genomic resources are highlighted in grey boxes while gained knowledge of genetics and genomics are highlighted in white rectangles. Genes are shown in bold and methods and approaches in italics.

Identification of deleted alleles in 39B3 and 39E7 fast neutron mutants of Citrus clementina

For this study, two mutants obtained by fast neutron mutagenesis of wild type Citrus clementina were selected from the IVIA mutant collection. These mutants, named 39B3 and 39E7, were expected to carry DNA deletion lesions in hemizygous dosage and showed a delay in natural colour break in fruit peel. The 39B3 mutant exhibited a delay in colour change from green to orange while 39E7 was better characterized by an abnormal final yellowish colour instead of the natural orange coloration. Putative deleted genes in the mutants were first identified through an approach based on genomic hybridization (array-CGH) that exploited a recently developed Citrus microarray containing 21240 cDNAs [4, 5]. To this end, total genomic DNA from four independent samples of mutants 39B3 and 39E7 were Cy3 or Cy5-labelled and cohybridized with wild type DNA labelled with the complementary Cy5 or Cy3 probe on four independent microarray slides. Fluorescence intensity data were normalized and single ESTs showing a mutant/wild type signal ratio lower than 0.7 fold, with a P-value lower than 0.2 (39B3) or 0.1 (39E7), were selected as putative candidates.

The number of ESTs fulfilling these criteria was 24 and 78 for mutants 39B3 and 39E7, respectively. One of the 39B3 positives [GenBank: CX299090], composed of three unrelated sequences was discarded for subsequent analysis due to its chimerical nature. In order to validate the array-CGH results, gene dosage of several putative candidates was determined through real-time PCR quantification of mutant/wild type signals for candidate ESTs as related to a reference undeleted gene [GenBank: CX293764]. The results showed that gene dosage for 39B3 candidates ranged from 0.50 to 0.60 when genomic DNA from the 39B3 genotype was tested, while ranged from 0.96 to 1.15 when the assayed DNA originated from the 39E7 genotype (Table 1). Similar results, corroborating the presence of putative deleted genes at half dosage, were also obtained for the 39E7 mutant. Therefore, the developed array-CGH procedure proved to be an appropriate tool to identify genes in hemizygous content in the self-incompatible clementine.

Table 1 Gene dosage measurement of deleted genes in 39B3 and 39E7 Citrus mutants.

Clustering of homologues of Citrus deleted genes in the poplar genome

Microsynteny comparisons with homologous stretches from the sequenced genomes of Arabidopsis thaliana, Populus trichocarpa and Vitis vinifera [2729] were performed in order to elucidate hypothetical clustering of Citrus deleted genes in the genome. TBLASTX, which searches for translations of a crude genome similar to a translated query, was utilized with an E-value cut-off of 10-5. The homologous regions produced by the best TBLASTX hit of each of the Citrus candidate genes were located on the chromosome maps of Arabidopsis, poplar and grapevine. Homologues of Citrus genes were then grouped into clusters in each species when the distance between them was shorter than 250 kb. The second and third TBLASTX best alignments were similarly placed in the respective maps when they were included in an existing cluster. In this case, a binding line was drawn linking the second and third hits to the best hit of the same Citrus query. Thus, two chromosomal maps, one for each mutant, in the three species was obtained. Figure 2 represents in detail chromosome mappings of the 39B3 mutation, which was subjected to further analyses. The results indicate that the Populus mapping exhibited rather lower complexity than the Arabidopsis and grapevine ones since it included fewer chromosomes and only 3 clusters although the number of 39B3 candidate genes represented in the map was identical (21) for the three genomes. Note that the number of represented hits in these mappings is higher than 21 due to the inclusion of second or third homologues. In Populus, most of the candidate genes mapped to two different genome regions of approximately 700 kb long in chromosomes 12 and 15, two duplicated chromosomes that probably originated during the recent genome duplication event that occurred in this species [28]. These two clusters contained 17 and 15 hits respectively while the third one placed in chromosome 16 had only one hit. In contrast, the number of clusters in Arabidopsis and Vitis were 9 and 11, respectively, and none of them contained more than 11 hits. Furthermore, cluster number (and clustering density) of the homologues of 39E7 putative deleted genes was also lower (and higher) in Populus than in Arabidopsis or Vitis, although the differences were smaller: 26, 30 and 30 clusters were obtained for poplar, Arabidopsis and grapevine respectively (Figure 3).

Figure 2

Chromosome mapping of poplar, Arabidopsis and grapevine homologues of the 39B3 Citrus deleted genes. The first TBLASTX hit for each Citrus deleted gene with an E value cut-off < 10-5 is represented on linkage groups (LG) from Populus trichocarpa, Arabidopsis thaliana and Vitis vinifera. Homologues of Citrus genes were grouped into clusters in each species when the distance between them was shorter than 250 kb. Second and third hits are only represented when they are located in a previously identified cluster, and in this case are linked to the first hit by a line. The value on each cluster indicates the hit number of the cluster.

Figure 3

Chromosome mapping of poplar, Arabidopsis and grapevine homologues of the 39E7 deleted genes. The TBLASTX hits for the 78 39E7 candidates, identified as stated in figure 2, are represented on linkage groups (LG) from Populus trichocarpa, Arabidopsis thaliana and Vitis vinifera. The number of hits contained in each cluster is shown.

Overall, these observations suggest that the Populus genomic regions homologous to the Citrus deletions were less fragmented than their counterparts in Arabidopsis and Vitis, and consequently microsynteny on the considered segments was higher with the Populus genome. These results are striking since Citrus and Arabidopsis belong to Sapindales and Brassicales orders (inside the same clade eurosids II) while Populus is included in the eurosids I clade, and Vitis is part of Vitaceae, a family outside of rosids [30].

Gene arrangement and partial physical map of the 39B3 deletion

The closer microsynteny observed between the 39B3 deletion and the two duplicated homologous regions in poplar enabled prediction of gene order by direct inference from the Populus sequences. This assumption led to the gene arrangement depicted in Figure 4. Twenty genes out of twenty-one having high similarity with Populus homologues were directly located on the Citrus deletion fragment by combining the two clusters found on Populus chromosomes 12 and 15, which shared 12 hits. Inclusion of the 21st gene, a homologue of a Populus gene placed on chromosome 16, in the 39B3 deletion was based on its location on the right end of the Citrus BAC CCER1019D04 (named B12, see below), whose left end shared identity with another deleted gene [GenBank: CX295702]. The accession number and protein similarity of these 21 genes, numbered according to the ordered position of their homologues on the poplar genome (Figure 4), are depicted in Table 2 that also shows coding strand sense of poplar homologues. The coding strand was coincident for the Populus paralogous genes present in chromosomes 12 and 15, except for genes similar to Citrus CX308429, located in position 8 in Figure 4.

Table 2 Gene components of the Citrus 39B3 deletion.
Figure 4

Gene composition of the Citrus 39B3 deletion inferred from poplar homologous regions. The 39B3 deleted Citrus genes are arranged in the centre of the figure in the order inferred from the position of their Populus homologues found in linkage groups 12, 15 and 16. Genes are numbered following this order. Strand sense deduced from poplar counterparts is indicated by an arrow.

Furthermore, the recent sequencing of 46,000 Citrus clementina BAC ends (to be published) enabled the construction of a physical map of the 39B3 deleted region. To this end, two DNA sequences covering 700 kb along the Populus chromosomes 12 and 15, containing the genes homologous to the Citrus deleted candidates, were BLASTed against the Citrus BAC end database. The homology search identified 33 BACs with a BLASTN E value lower than 10-5 for both paralogous regions. In subsequent analyses, redundant BACs were discarded, while additional candidate BACs were obtained by comparing these previous ones with the BES database to yield overlapping BACs. Moreover, BACs with both ends showing similarity to repetitive DNA that may cause ambiguous positioning and inaccurate gene dosage measurement were also discarded. Finally, a partial physical map containing 13 BACs systematically named B1 to B13 (Table 3) was provided by standard PCR of BAC end amplicons against BAC templates and in silico search of overlapping antiparallel ends (Figures 5A, B).

Table 3 Listing of BACs included in the Citrus 39B3 deletion.
Figure 5

Local physical mapping of the Citrus 39B3 deletion. (A) Electrophoretic analysis of PCR products showing overlapping BACs. Purified BAC templates are distributed horizontally and divided in two panels. Primer pairs were designed from BAC end sequences containing non-repetitive DNA and named with the number of the BAC plus "-L" for left end and "-R" for right end according to the drawing orientation. B7-I primers amplify an internal sequence from B7 instead of an end. Gene dosage measurements for some of the primer pairs in the 39B3 genotype are shown on the left side of the electrophoretic images. (B) Physical map of the Citrus 39B3 deletion. Horizontal lines represent BACs, which are numbered from left to right. Vertical arrows show overlapping as inferred from PCR reactions and the head of the arrow indicates the BAC template. The vertical lines without arrow show connection of B11 with B12 by sequence of unigene aCL4690Contig1 and B12 with B13 by aCL1915Contig2 instead of a PCR reaction.

This mapping contained three gaps, one at the 5' deletion junction and two internal ones (Figure 5B) delimiting three main BAC clusters, composed of B1 to B4, B5 to B8, and B9 to B13. BACs B11 and B12 were connected by unigene aCL4690Contig1 coding for a putative subunit ClpD of an ATP-dependent Clp protease, whose sequence was shared by both BACs. Similarly B12 and B13 interaction is mediated by unigene aCL1915Contig2 (Table 2, 3). Real-time PCR quantification of gene dosage for some of the BAC ends (Figure 5A) confirmed the presence of these sequences at half dosage in the mutant genotype, indicating that the 39B3 mutation is a hemizygous deletion. Indeed, all analyzed BACs covered an internal segment of the deletion except B13 that exhibited haploid gene dosage on the left end and diploid dosage on the right one, suggesting that B13 contained the 3' border of the 39B3 deletion.

The above results indicated that the microsynteny between Citrus and Populus genomes was high enough to predict gene arrangement and to build a partial physical map of a Citrus genomic segment of about 700 kb, as inferred from the length of poplar homologous regions. Nevertheless, the observation that a 700 kb Citrus fragment only contains 21 genes may result striking considering an average distance of 10 Kb between adjacent genes, as deduced from the estimations of Citrus genome size (367 Mb) and gene number (35,000–40,000). It should be noted, however, that the microarray used in these analyses contains between approximately 2/3 and 1/2 of the estimated gene content of the Citrus genome, which may account for a major part of the hypothetical "loss" of deleted candidates. While this is a weakness of the currently available Citrus arrays, non-attributable to the array-CGH procedure, more complete results are expected after the development of a more representative cDNA microarray. Other limitations of the method may be related to the differential hybridization potential of different cDNAs, including for instance cross-hybridizations. In this regard, oligonucleotide arrays are particularly suited for the detection of dissimilar DNA variants. Alternatively, synteny might be limited to several genes located on a bulk of non-conserved sequences inside this 700 Kb region, a possibility that may only be corroborated after genome sequencing.

Overall, the data indicated that the Populus genome is a useful model for comparative genomics which may be used to characterize hemizygous deletions in Citrus.

The Citrus 39B3 deletion shows higher local gene colinearity with Populus than with Arabidopsis

Local gene colinearity between two genomic fragments is determined by the number of paralogous genes arranged in the same order. Therefore, not only permanence of genes in their original chromosomal location, but also conservation of gene order, affects local colinearity. In order to validate the gene arrangement postulated in Figure 4 and consequently to estimate gene colinearity of the 39B3 Citrus deletion with Populus homologous fragments, we mapped by PCR the 21 genes listed in Table 2 on the physical map of Figure 5B. All but three genes showed at least one PCR product on the array of 13 BACs, confirming that those genes were effectively included in the 39B3 deletion (Figure 6A). In addition, PCR reactions reproduced at the BAC size resolution the expected gene order outlined in Figure 4, corroborating the gene arrangement deduced by comparative genomics. In Figure 6B, the genes rendering a positive PCR signal were linked to the physical map position with an arrow. Moreover, genes 3, 4 and 9 corresponding to unigenes aCL3991Contig1, aC18005F10Rv_c and aC16014F08SK_c, respectively, did not show a detectable PCR signal on purified BACs, although their respective primers produced a band of the expected size when tested against genomic DNA from normal clementine cultivar (data not shown). These genes were most likely placed into the two reported internal gaps of the physical map, as suggested by the border situation of their neighbouring genes.

Figure 6

Gene arrangement on the physical map of the Citrus 39B3 deletion. (A) Primer pairs designed for the putative deleted genes included in the 39B3 deletion (Table 2) were utilized in PCR reactions on the BAC templates shown in Table 3. Genes are numbered and arranged vertically, on the left side of the electrophoretic image, and BAC templates are listed horizontally. (B) Citrus genes included in the 39B3 deletion and arranged as drawn in Figure 4 but without indication of strand sense, are connected with arrows to the deletion physical map according to PCR results.

These results confirm high local gene colinearity with poplar in the genomic region covered by 39B3 deletion. Taking together gene content and order conservation (Figures 2, 3 and 6), it is inferred that in the studied DNA deleted segment there was higher gene colinearity with Populus, which diverged about 109 million years ago (Mya), than with Arabidopsis, splitting from the Citrus lineage about 87 Mya [30], despite gene colinearity generally being correlated with phylogenetic relatedness. A similar conclusion has been reached in our group, after comparing the whole collection of Citrus BES with the poplar and Arabidopsis genomes (to be published), and also in previous works in papaya and melon. In papaya, BES alignment to the annotated genomes rendered higher gene colinearity with Populus than with Arabidopsis, although both Arabidopsis and papaya belong to the order Brassicales [31]. In melon, microsynteny studies based on the sequence of two BACs also concluded that melon was closer to Populus than to Arabidopsis or Medicago truncatula [32]. These observations may be explained by a differential genome evolutionary dynamics in poplar and Arabidopsis lineages [33]. The more recent appraisals estimated that last whole genome duplications occurred not later than 60–65 Mya in Populus and around 24–40 Mya in Arabidopsis lineages [28, 3436]. Despite the older poplar event, genome rearrangements involving gene loss and translocation following these duplications were much more frequent in Arabidopsis ancestors [37]. Such a highly active genome dynamics probably caused the dispersion of genes and the subsequent reduction in synteny and gene colinearity with even related species. The different behaviour of Populus and Arabidopsis ancestral genomes still deserves further explanation. It has been suggested that woody long-lived species like poplar trees may undergo a slower genome dynamics due to their juvenile period that delays sexual fecundation for several years and to the recurrent contribution of gametes from aged individuals of previous generations [28]. In addition, species like Arabidopsis thaliana may have very active mechanisms for unequal or illegitimate recombination causing frequent chromosomal rearrangements such as translocations, insertions and deletions. In this context, it is notable that nearly all Citrus species and many related genera have 2n = 18, probably indicating slow chromosomal evolution in this group.

Chlorophyll a/b ratio is modified in 39B3 mutant

Structural studies describing gene arrangement on a particular deletion have outstanding importance for linking a specific mutant phenotype with an impaired gene. The 39B3 deletion removed at least a set of 21 genes and resulted in delayed chlorophyll catabolism. Although in principle, no obvious candidate genes could be unequivocally related to the exocarp colour break retardation, the 39B3 mutant certainly exhibited altered chlorophyll a and b content. Ratios of chlorophyll a to chlorophyll b contents in 39B3 mutant were about 15% to 23% lower than those found in wild type when three different green tissues were tested: fruit exocarp, old and young leaves (Figure 7). This distinct chlorophyll composition was not accompanied by alterations in the total content of chlorophylls in the leaves although pigment levels in 39B3 fruit exocarp, as expected, were clearly higher (0.48 mg/g fresh weight) than in the peel of control fruit (0.15 mg/g fresh weight) that has initiated chlorophyll degradation (Table 4). The chlorophyll accumulation observed in the 39B3 exocarp, however, is higher than the maximum reached in normal clementine fruits (0.35 mg/g f w) [38], suggesting that the mutation also induced total chlorophyll build-up in the fruit peel. Indeed, fruit exocarps of a "wild type" clementine tree showing fruit colour delay due to altered environmental conditions showed chlorophyll a/b ratios equivalent to those found in the standard cultivar (Figure 7) while total pigments had an intermediate value (0.29 mg/g f w) between those of normal and 39B3 genotypes (Table 4).

Table 4 Total chlorophyll content in green tissues from 39B3 mutant and "wild type" cultivar of Citrus clementina.
Figure 7

Chlorophyll a / b ratio in green tissues from 39B3 mutant and wild type cultivar of Citrus clementina. Chlorophyll a and b content was measured in young and old leaves and fruit peel exocarp from wild type clementine cultivar (Wt) and 39B3 mutant (39B3). Measurements were also taken from exocarps of a normal wild type clementine tree showing fruit colour delay (Wt-d) due to altered environmental conditions. The relative content of chlorophyll a to chlorophyll b is represented as the Ca/Cb ratio. Data are average of 3 (exocarp) or 5 (leaves) independent determinations and error bars show standard deviation.

Unigene aCL766Contig1, one of the 39B3 hits validated by real-time quantitative PCR (Table 1) coding for a ClpC-like protein, may have certain relevance to the altered chlorophyll composition found in 39B3 mutant. Plant ClpCs are ATP-binding proteins located in the stroma of chloroplasts which have been found to be associated with the protein import machinery [39] and with the Clp protease complex [40]. In fact, ClpC has been related to protein translocation across the chloroplast inner envelope membrane and to multiple processes requiring proteolytic cleavage, as protein turnover and regulation [41, 42]. In Arabidopsis, insertional mutagenesis in the ClpC1 gene caused chlorosis, growth retardation, photosynthetic damage and defects in chloroplast protein import [4345] and no double knock-outs of ClpC1 and the less expressed ClpC2 genes were obtained, suggesting that ClpC function is essential in plants [46]. In addition, a mutant impaired in ClpC1 mRNA processing accumulated chlorophyllide a oxygenase protein (CAO), a key enzyme for the synthesis of chlorophyll b from chlorophyll a, leading to a reduced chlorophyll a/b ratio [47]. Interestingly, aCL4690Contig1 unigene coding for another subunit of Clp complexes (ClpD-like) with sequence similarity to aCL766Contig1 showed half gene dosage (Table 1) and was also included in the 39B3 deletion. Expression of both ClpC-like and ClpD-like genes was analyzed in fruit exocarps from wild type and 39B3 mutant at two different developmental stages: green immature peel (September) and shortly after the time of natural colour break in wild type peel (November). Both genes showed reduced expression in the 39B3 mutant, an observation that was well correlated with the alteration in chlorophyll composition since ClpC-like and ClpD- like alleles in the hemizygous 39B3 mutant reached about a half of the expression values found in the wild type (Figure 8). These results suggest that wild type alleles are similarly expressed in the peel of clementine fruit. Furthermore, sequencing of the ClpC-like gene that according to its Arabidopsis homologue plays a major role in chlorophyll composition, also revealed that there were no essential differences between wild type and 39B3 mutant coding regions (Additional file 1). This observation corroborated that not only expression but also protein sequence were identical in the analyzed ClpC-like alleles. In the wild type, three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) were observed in two different introns, which were very likely unable to alter protein stability or function. These single base variants that were detected as sequence ambiguities (N) were due to the presence of overlapping base peaks contributed by both alleles, while hemizygous ClpC-like gene in 39B3 mutant produced an unambiguous signal in the same positions. Bases 2572, 4104 and 4119 located on the forth and sixth introns were identified as guanine, guanine and adenine in the mutant, while a mix of guanine and thymine, guanine and adenine and adenine and thymine were respectively found in wild type DNA (Figure 9). While the contribution of the ClpC-like gene dosage to the retardation of the natural exocarp degreening remains to be unequivocally demonstrated, the data presented above clearly shows that there is a strong correlation between chlorophyll composition and the presence of a single allele in the mutant. Additional analysis of the remaining genes inside 39B3 deletion should be performed in order to accomplish a complete candidate gene approach

Figure 8

Relative expression level of ClpC -like and ClpD -like genes in 39B3 mutant. Quantitative real-time PCR with specific primers for ClpC-like (A) and ClpD-like genes (B) was performed on reverse transcribed RNA from fruit exocarps at two different developmental stages (September and November) from wild type (wt) and 39B3 mutant. Specific first strand cDNA concentration in 39B3 mutant is related to wild type values. The results are average and standard deviation of three independent biological replicates that were assayed twice.

Figure 9

Single nucleotide polymorphisms in ClpC -like alleles. Four colour representations of polymorphic stretches in the sequence of the ClpC-like gene in wild type (upper panels) and 39B3 mutant DNA (lower panel). Differential nucleotides are labelled in red. The residues are numbered from the A in the ATG codon.


In this study, we propose a procedure for the genetic characterization of genomic hemizygous deletions in citrus mutants. The procedure that might be applied to other non-sequenced species of similar genome size and ploidy level is illustrated with the study of the 39B3 Citrus clementina deletion, generated by fast neutron bombardment. The proposed strategy utilizes several genomic resources such as array-Comparative Genomic Hybridization (array-CGH) technology, EST and BAC end sequencing databases and poplar genome annotation.

The array-CGH results led to the conclusion that the 39B3 deletion removed at least 21 genes while a partial physical map of about 700 kb of the deleted region was inferred by comparison of two homologous genomic regions from poplar with a Citrus BES database.

Structural data including gene content and order in the deletion was utilized for microsynteny and local gene colinearity studies concluding that in the studied region Citrus is more similar to Populus than to Arabidopsis, a phylogenetically closer species. This observation supports previous works on other species and suggests that the Arabidopsis lineage underwent a quicker genome evolutionary dynamics than the Populus one.

Among the deleted alleles, the function of ClpC-like, coding for a putative subunit of a protease involved in chlorophyll b synthesis was directly related to the mutant phenotype since green mutant tissues had a lower chlorophyll a/b ratio.


Plant material

Approximately 6 years-old clementine trees (Citrus clementina Hort. Ex Tan. cv. clemenules) grown under standard agricultural practices at the Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA) were used in this study. Commercial highly heterozygous clementine cultivars are considered "wild type" material, while the 39B3 and 39E7 genotypes that belong to the IVIA mutant collection were obtained through bud irradiation with fast neutrons (5–6 Gy) at the Instituto Tecnologico e Nuclear (Sacavem, Portugal) in the frame of a much wider breeding program. Both mutants are expected to carry DNA deletion lesions in hemizygous dosage and showed altered patterns of colour change of fruit peel.


The protocol was adapted from several published array-Comparative Genomic Hybridization (array-CGH) methods pursuing mainly the measurement of copy-number changes in human genomic DNA [4850], and the study of large-scale genetic variation of the symbiotic bacteria Sinorhizobium meliloti [51]. Genomic DNA was isolated from leaves of wild type and mutant plants, using DNeasy plant mini kit (Qiagen). Four Cy3 or Cy5-labelled independent biological samples from each mutant plant were co-profiled on four 20K Citrus cDNA microarrays containing 21240 EST, using Cy5 or Cy3-labelled control genomic DNA, respectively. Label probes were prepared as follow: Cy3- or Cy5-dCTP fluorescent nucleotides (Amersham Biosciences) were incorporated directly in control and mutant genomic DNA (2 μg) using BioPrime Array CGH Genomic Labelling System (Invitrogene). Purified Cy5 and Cy3 labelled probes (about 50 μl each) were combined and mixed with 30 μg Cot-1 DNA (Invitrogene), 100 μg yeast tRNA (Invitrogene), and 346 μl TE buffer pH 7.4. Cot-1 DNA and yeast tRNA were used to block non-specific hybridization. Samples were laid on a microcon YM-30 filter (Millipore), and subsequently centrifuged until sample volume was reduced to approximately 48 μl. Finally, 10.2 μl 20× SSC and 1.8 μl 10% SDS were added to the probe mixture to reach a final volume of 60 μl containing 3.4× SSC and 0.3% SDS. For microarray hybridization, the probe mixture was denatured by heating at 97°C for 5 minutes, and immediately incubated at 37°C during 30 minutes to block repetitive DNA sequences. Hybridization mixture was applied to a 37°C pre-warmed hybrid-slip (Sigma), and a pre-warmed array slide was lowered onto the mix. Microarrays were hybridized in darkness at 65°C overnight (16–20 hours) using a glass array cassette following manufacturer's instructions (Ambion, cat. n° AM10040). To prevent evaporation of hybridization solution during incubation, 5 μl of 3× SCC were poured into the reservoir inside the cassette chamber. Following hybridization, microarray slides were placed in a rack and the cover slip removed by 10 minutes immersion in a washing chamber containing 2× SSC and 0.03% SDS at room temperature (RT). Microarray slides were passed through a series of washes on a shaking platform. Wash series were as follow: 2× SSC, 0.03% SDS for 5 min at 65°C, followed by 1× SSC for 5 min at RT, and 3 × 15 min washes in 0.2× SSC at RT. After first wash slides were transferred to new racks to minimize transference of SDS to the next washing solution. Microarray slides were dried by centrifugation for 5 min at 300 rpm by using an Eppendorf 5804-R tabletop centrifuge. Arrays were immediately scanned at 5 μm. Cy3 and Cy5 fluorescence intensity was collected by using a ScanArray Gx (Perkin Elmer). The resulting images were overlaid and spots identified by the ScanArray Express program (Perkin Elmer). Spot quality was first measured by the signal-to-background method with parameters lower limit (200) and multiplier (2), and subsequently confirmed by visual test. Data analysis was performed using the Limma package from the R statistical computing software [5254]. A mutant/wild type signal lower than 0.7, with a P-value not higher than 0.1 (39E7) or 0.2 (39B3) were the cut-off values for positive EST identification. The experimental design of microarray experiments has been loaded into the ArrayExpress database [55] under accessions E-MEXP-1432 and E-MEXP-1433.

Gene dosage measurements

Quantitative real-time PCR was performed on a LightCycler 2.0 instrument (Roche), using the LightCycler FastStart DNA MasterPLUS SYBR Green I kit (Roche). Reaction composition and conditions followed manufacturer's instructions. Each individual PCR reaction contained 2 ng of genomic DNA from wild type or mutant, obtained with the DNeasy plant mini kit (Qiagen). Cycling protocol consisted of 10 min at 95°C for pre-incubation, then 40 cycles of 10 sec at 95°C for denaturation, 10 sec at 60°C for annealing and 10–25 sec at 72°C for extension. Fluorescent intensity data were acquired during the extension time. Specificity of the PCR reaction was assessed by the presence of a single peak in the dissociation curve after the amplification and through size estimation of the amplified product. For gene dosage measurements, we used the relative quantification-monocolor analysis from the LightCycler Software 4.0 package (Roche). This program compares the ratio of a target sequence to a reference DNA sequence in the mutant sample with the ratio of these sequences in a wild type sample. PCR and normalized calculations were repeated in at least three independent samples from each mutant and wild type, rendering an estimation of target gene dosage in the mutant genotype. Primers for the reference sequence were obtained from CX293764.

Similarity searches

DNA sequences of Citrus unigenes containing positive array-CGH ESTs were used in online TBLASTX searches against genomic databases from the annotated genomes of Arabidopsis thaliana [56], Populus trichocarpa [57] and Vitis vinifera [58] at an E-value cut-off of 10-5. For each gene, the best hit was placed on a chromosomal map while the second and third hits were only positioned in the map if they were located closer than 250 kb to any other hit. Two 700 kb regions from chromosomes 12 and 15 from the Populus genome including homologous genes to 39B3 array-CGH positive unigenes, were used as queries in a BLASTN local search on a Citrus BAC end sequence database. Only hits corresponding to those BAC ends showing an E-value lower than 10-5 in both chromosome searches were considered for the building of a local physical map of the 39B3 deletion.

BAC isolation and analysis

DNA from Citrus BACs was isolated with the Rapid Plasmid Miniprep System (Marligen Biosciences). Purified BACs were used as templates in PCR reactions in a total volume of 15 μl, including 0.2 mM dNTP, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.5 μM of each primer, 0.38 units of Netzyme DNA polymerase (Molecular Netline Bioproducts) and 0.1 ng of BAC DNA. After an initial denaturing step for 5 min at 95°C, amplification was performed for 35 cycles of 30 sec at 95°C, 30 sec at 60°C and 30 sec at 72°C, followed by 5 min incubation at 72°C. The PCR product was subjected to 1.5% agarose DNA electrophoresis.

Chlorophyll measurements

At least, three developing and mature leaves and fruit exocarp sectors from standard and 39B3 mutant lines of clementine were randomly collected per sample. Fruit exocarp tissues from a wild type clementine tree showing fruit colour delay due to altered environmental conditions were also sampled for chlorophyll analyses. Chlorophylls a and b were extracted with N,N-dimethylformamide for 72 h in the dark at 4°C and quantified through the absorbance at 647 and 664 nm following a reported procedure [59]. Absorbance was measured using a Varian Cary 50 UV-visible spectrophotometer (Varian).

Gene expression measurements

Total RNA was extracted from fruit exocarp of wild type and 39B3 mutant using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). RNA concentration was determined by a fluorometric assay with the RiboGreen dye (Molecular Probes) following the manufacturer's instructions. About 5 μg of total RNA were reverse transcribed with the SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen) in a total volume of 20 μl. Single strand cDNA corresponding to ClpC-like and ClpD-like genes was amplified by quantitative real-time PCR on a LightCycler 2.0 instrument (Roche), using the LightCycler FastStart DNA MasterPLUS SYBR Green I kit (Roche). One μl of a 20 times diluted first-strand cDNA was used for each amplification reaction. Cycling protocol consisted of 10 min at 95°C for pre-incubation, then 40 cycles of 10 sec at 95°C for denaturation, 10 sec at 60°C for annealing and 15 sec at 72°C for extension. Melting curve analysis by applying increasing temperature from 65°C to 95°C (0.1°C/s) and gel electrophoresis of final product confirmed single amplicons. For expression measurements, we used the absolute quantification analysis from the LightCycler Software 4.0 package (Roche), and calculated expression levels relative to wild type values. Three independent biological samples were analyzed for wild type and mutant genotypes. Primers sequences are provided in Additional file 2.

ClpC-like genomic sequence

ClpC-like genomic sequence from very few base pairs after the ATG until few base pairs before the stop codon was divided in four PCR fragments: Amplicon 3/4 (1820 bp) was amplified and sequenced with primers CLPC3 and CLPC4, amplicon 5/8 (2168 bp) was amplified with primers CLPC5 and CLPC8 and sequenced with primers CLPC5, CLPC8, CLPC10 and CLPC11, amplicon 7/2 (1446 bp) was amplified and sequenced with primers CLPC7 and CLPC2, and amplicon 1/6 (1158 bp) was amplified and sequenced with primers CLPC1 and CLPC6. Each amplicon was obtained by combining the product of 6–8 independent reactions. Primers sequences are provided in Additional file 2.


  1. 1.

    Miflin B: Crop improvement in the 21st century. J Exp Bot. 2000, 51: 1-8. 10.1093/jexbot/51.342.1.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Iglesias DJ, Cercos M, Colmenero-Flores JM, Naranjo MA, Rios G, Carrera E, Ruiz-Rivero O, Lliso I, Morillon R, Tadeo FR, Talon M: Physiology of citrus fruiting. Braz J Plant Physiol. 2008,

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Tadeo FR, Cercos M, Colmenero-Flores JM, Iglesias DJ, Naranjo MA, Morillon R, Carrera E, Lliso I, Rios G, Ruiz-Rivero O, Talon M: Molecular physiology of development and quality of citrus. Adv Bot Res. 2008,

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Forment J, Gadea J, Huerta L, Abizanda L, Agusti J, Alamar S, Alos E, Andres F, Arribas R, Beltran JP, Berbel A, Blazquez MA, Brumos J, Canas LA, Cercos M, Colmenero-Flores JM, Conesa A, Estables B, Gandia M, Garcia-Martinez JL, Gimeno J, Gisbert A, Gomez G, Gonzalez-Candelas L, Granell A, Guerri J, Lafuente MT, Madueno F, Marcos JF, Marques MC, Martinez F, Martinez-Godoy MA, Miralles S, Moreno P, Navarro L, Pallas V, Perez-Amador MA, Perez-Valle J, Pons C, Rodrigo I, Rodriguez PL, Royo C, Serrano R, Soler G, Tadeo F, Talon M, Terol J, Trenor M, Vaello L, Vicente O, Vidal C, Zacarias L, Conejero V: Development of a citrus genome-wide EST collection and cDNA microarray as resources for genomic studies. Plant Mol Biol. 2005, 57: 375-391. 10.1007/s11103-004-7926-1.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Terol J, Conesa A, Colmenero JM, Cercos M, Tadeo F, Agusti J, Alos E, Andres F, Soler G, Brumos J, Iglesias DJ, Gotz S, Legaz F, Argout X, Courtois B, Ollitrault P, Dossat C, Wincker P, Morillon R, Talon M: Analysis of 13000 unique Citrus clusters associated with fruit quality, production and salinity tolerance. BMC Genomics. 2007, 8: 31-10.1186/1471-2164-8-31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bausher M, Shatters R, Chaparro J, Dang P, Hunter W, Niedz R: An expressed sequence tag (EST) set from Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck whole seedlings and the implications of further perennial source investigations. Plant Sci. 2003, 165: 415-422. 10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00202-4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Shimada T, Kita M, Endo T, Fujii H, Ueda T, Moriguchi T, Omura M: Expressed sequence tags of ovary tissue cDNA library in Citrus unshiu Marc. Plant Sci. 2003, 165: 167-168. 10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00155-9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Fujii H, Shimada T, Sugiyama A, Nishikawa F, Endo T, Nakano M, Ikoma Y, Shimizu T, Omura M: Profiling ethylene-responsive genes in mature mandarin fruit using a citrus 22K oligoarray. Plant Science. 2007, 173: 340-348. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2007.06.006.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Shimada T, Fujii H, Endo T, Yazaki J, Kishimoto N, Shimbo K, Kikuchi S, Omura M: Toward comprehensive expression profiling by microarray analysis in citrus: monitoring the expression profiles of 2213 genes during fruit development. Plant Sci. 2005, 168: 1383-1385. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.01.013.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bruggemann E, Handwerger K, Essex C, Storz G: Analysis of fast neutron-generated mutants at the Arabidopsis thaliana HY4 locus. Plant J. 1996, 10: 755-760. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1996.10040755.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Li X, Song YJ, Century K, Straight S, Ronald P, Dong XN, Lassner M, Zhang YL: A fast neutron deletion mutagenesis-based reverse genetics system for plants. Plant J. 2001, 27: 235-242. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01084.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Gonzalez-Carranza ZH, Rompa U, Peters JL, Bhatt AM, Wagstaff C, Stead AD, Roberts JA: HAWAIIAN SKIRT: An F-box gene that regulates organ fusion and growth in arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144: 1370-1382. 10.1104/pp.106.092288.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Li X, Lassner M, Zhang YL: Deleteagene: a fast neutron deletion mutagenesis-based gene knockout system for plants. Compar Funct Genom. 2002, 3: 158-160. 10.1002/cfg.148.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Straus D, Ausubel FM: Genomic Subtraction for Cloning Dna Corresponding to Deletion Mutations. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990, 87: 1889-1893. 10.1073/pnas.87.5.1889.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Shirley BW, Hanley S, Goodman HM: Effects of Ionizing-Radiation on A Plant Genome - Analysis of 2 Arabidopsis Transparent-Testa Mutations. Plant Cell. 1992, 4: 333-347. 10.1105/tpc.4.3.333.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Silverstone AL, Ciampaglio CN, Sun TP: The Arabidopsis RGA gene encodes a transcriptional regulator repressing the gibberellin signal transduction pathway. Plant Cell. 1998, 10: 155-169. 10.1105/tpc.10.2.155.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gong JM, Waner DA, Horie T, Li SL, Horie R, Abid KB, Schroeder JI: Microarray-based rapid cloning of an ion accumulation deletion mutant in Arabidopsis thaliana. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 15404-15409. 10.1073/pnas.0404780101.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Sudar D, Rutovitz D, Gray JW, Waldman F, Pinkel D: Comparative Genomic Hybridization for Molecular Cytogenetic Analysis of Solid Tumors. Science. 1992, 258: 818-821. 10.1126/science.1359641.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Geschwind DH, Gregg J, Boone K, Karrim J, Pawlikowska-Haddal A, Rao E, Ellison J, Ciccodicola A, D'Urso M, Woods R, Rappold GA, Swerdloff R, Nelson SF: Klinefelter's syndrome as a model of anomalous cerebral laterality: testing gene dosage in the X chromosome pseudoautosomal region using a DNA microarray. Dev Genet. 1998, 23: 215-229. 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6408(1998)23:3<215::AID-DVG7>3.0.CO;2-X.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Heiskanen MA, Bittner ML, Chen Y, Khan J, Adler KE, Trent JM, Meltzer PS: Detection of gene amplification by genomic hybridization to cDNA microarrays. Cancer Res. 2000, 60: 799-802.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, Clark S, Poole I, Kowbel D, Collins C, Kuo WL, Chen C, Zhai Y, Dairkee SH, Ljung BM, Gray JW, Albertson DG: High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat Genet. 1998, 20: 207-211. 10.1038/2524.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Pollack JR, Perou CM, Alizadeh AA, Eisen MB, Pergamenschikov A, Williams CF, Jeffrey SS, Botstein D, Brown PO: Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays. Nat Genet. 1999, 23: 41-46. 10.1038/14385.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Solinas-Toldo S, Lampel S, Stilgenbauer S, Nickolenko J, Benner A, Dohner H, Cremer T, Lichter P: Matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization: biochips to screen for genomic imbalances. Gene Chromosome Canc. 1997, 20: 399-407. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(199712)20:4<399::AID-GCC12>3.0.CO;2-I.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Fan CZ, Vibranovski MD, Chen Y, Long MY: A microarray based genomic hybridization method for identification of new genes in plants: Case analyses of Arabidopsis and Oryza. J Integr Plant Biol. 2007, 49: 915-926. 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2007.00503.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Henry IM, Dilkes BP, Comai L: Molecular karyotyping and aneuploidy detection in Arabidopsis thaliana using quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction. Plant J. 2006, 48: 307-319. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02871.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Pflieger S, Lefebvre V, Causse M: The candidate gene approach in plant genetics: a review. Mol Breeding. 2001, 7: 275-291. 10.1023/A:1011605013259.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Arabidopsis G: Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature. 2000, 408: 796-815. 10.1038/35048692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Tuskan GA, DiFazio S, Jansson S, Bohlmann J, Grigoriev I, Hellsten U, Putnam N, Ralph S, Rombauts S, Salamov A, Schein J, Sterck L, Aerts A, Bhalerao RR, Bhalerao RP, Blaudez D, Boerjan W, Brun A, Brunner A, Busov V, Campbell M, Carlson J, Chalot M, Chapman J, Chen GL, Cooper D, Coutinho PM, Couturier J, Covert S, Cronk Q, Cunningham R, Davis J, Degroeve S, Dejardin A, Depamphilis C, Detter J, Dirks B, Dubchak I, Duplessis S, Ehlting J, Ellis B, Gendler K, Goodstein D, Gribskov M, Grimwood J, Groover A, Gunter L, Hamberger B, Heinze B, Helariutta Y, Henrissat B, Holligan D, Holt R, Huang W, Islam-Faridi N, Jones S, Jones-Rhoades M, Jorgensen R, Joshi C, Kangasjarvi J, Karlsson J, Kelleher C, Kirkpatrick R, Kirst M, Kohler A, Kalluri U, Larimer F, Leebens-Mack J, Leple JC, Locascio P, Lou Y, Lucas S, Martin F, Montanini B, Napoli C, Nelson DR, Nelson C, Nieminen K, Nilsson O, Pereda V, Peter G, Philippe R, Pilate G, Poliakov A, Razumovskaya J, Richardson P, Rinaldi C, Ritland K, Rouze P, Ryaboy D, Schmutz J, Schrader J, Segerman B, Shin H, Siddiqui A, Sterky F, Terry A, Tsai CJ, Uberbacher E, Unneberg P, Vahala J, Wall K, Wessler S, Yang G, Yin T, Douglas C, Marra M, Sandberg G, de Peer YV, Rokhsar D: The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science. 2006, 313: 1596-1604. 10.1126/science.1128691.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Jaillon O, Aury JM, Noel B, Policriti A, Clepet C, Casagrande A, Choisne N, Aubourg S, Vitulo N, Jubin C, Vezzi A, Legeai F, Hugueney P, Dasilva C, Horner D, Mica E, Jublot D, Poulain J, Bruyere C, Billault A, Segurens B, Gouyvenoux M, Ugarte E, Cattonaro F, Anthouard V, Vico V, Del Fabbro C, Alaux M, Di Gaspero G, Dumas V, Felice N, Paillard S, Juman I, Moroldo M, Scalabrin S, Canaguier A, Le Clainche I, Malacrida G, Durand E, Pesole G, Laucou V, Chatelet P, Merdinoglu D, Delledonne M, Pezzotti M, Lecharny A, Scarpelli C, Artiguenave F, Pe ME, Valle G, Morgante M, Caboche M, dam-Blondon AF, Weissenbach J, Quetier F, Wincker P: The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature. 2007, 449: 463-4U5. 10.1038/nature06148.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wikstrom N, Savolainen V, Chase MW: Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio. 2001, 268: 2211-2220. 10.1098/rspb.2001.1782.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lai CWJ, Yu QY, Hou SB, Skelton RL, Jones MR, Lewis KLT, Murray J, Eustice M, Guan PZ, Agbayani R, Moore PH, Ming R, Presting GG: Analysis of papaya BAC end sequences reveals first insights into the organization of a fruit tree genome. Mol Genet Genomics. 2006, 276: 1-12. 10.1007/s00438-006-0122-z.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Deleu W, Gonzalez V, Monfort A, Bendahmane A, Puigdomenech P, Arus P, Garcia-Mas J: Structure of two melon regions reveals high microsynteny with sequenced plant species. Mol Genet Genomics. 2007, 278: 611-622. 10.1007/s00438-007-0277-2.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kellogg EA, Bennetzen JL: The evolution of nuclear genome structure in seed plants. Am J Bot. 2004, 91: 1709-1725. 10.3732/ajb.91.10.1709.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Blanc G, Hokamp K, Wolfe KH: A recent polyploidy superimposed on older large-scale duplications in the Arabidopsis genome. Genome Res. 2003, 13: 137-144. 10.1101/gr.751803.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ermolaeva MD, Wu M, Eisen JA, Salzberg SL: The age of the Arabidopsis thaliana genome duplication. Plant Mol Biol. 2003, 51: 859-866. 10.1023/A:1023001130337.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Bowers JE, Chapman BA, Rong JK, Paterson AH: Unravelling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events. Nature. 2003, 422: 433-438. 10.1038/nature01521.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Vision TJ, Brown DG, Tanksley SD: The origins of genomic duplications in Arabidopsis. Science. 2000, 290: 2114-2117. 10.1126/science.290.5499.2114.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Alos E, Cercos M, Rodrigo MJ, Zacarias L, Talon M: Regulation of color break in citrus fruits. Changes in pigment profiling and gene expression induced by gibberellins and nitrate, two ripening retardants. J Agric Food Chem. 2006, 54: 4888-4895. 10.1021/jf0606712.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Nielsen E, Akita M, DavilaAponte J, Keegstra K: Stable association of chloroplastic precursors with protein translocation complexes that contain proteins from both envelope membranes and a stromal Hsp 100 molecular chaperone. EMBO J. 1997, 16: 935-946. 10.1093/emboj/16.5.935.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Desimone M, WeissWichert C, Wagner E, Altenfeld U, Johanningmeier U: Immunochemical studies on the Clp-protease in chloroplasts: Evidence for the formation of a ClpC/P complex. Bot Acta. 1997, 110: 234-239.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Adam Z, Rudella A, van Wijk KJ: Recent advances in the study of Clp, FtsH and other proteases located in chloroplasts. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006, 9: 234-240. 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.03.010.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Jackson-Constan D, Akita M, Keegstra K: Molecular chaperones involved in chloroplast protein import. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001, 1541: 102-113. 10.1016/S0167-4889(01)00148-3.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Constan D, Froehlich JE, Rangarajan S, Keegstra K: A stromal Hsp100 protein is required for normal chloroplast development and function in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136: 3605-3615. 10.1104/pp.104.052928.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kovacheva S, Bedard J, Patel R, Dudley P, Twell D, Rios G, Koncz C, Jarvis P: In vivo studies on the roles of Tic110, Tic40 and Hsp93 during chloroplast protein import. Plant J. 2005, 41: 412-428.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Sjogren LLE, MacDonald TM, Sutinen S, Clarke AK: Inactivation of the clpC1 gene encoding a chloroplast Hsp100 molecular chaperone causes growth retardation, leaf chlorosis, lower photosynthetic activity, and a specific reduction in photosystem content. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136: 4114-4126. 10.1104/pp.104.053835.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Kovacheva S, Bedard J, Wardle A, Patel R, Jarvis P: Further in vivo studies on the role of the molecular chaperone, Hsp93, in plastid protein import. Plant J. 2007, 50: 364-379. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03060.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Nakagawara E, Sakuraba Y, Yamasato A, Tanaka R, Tanaka A: Clp protease controls chlorophyll b synthesis by regulating the level of chlorophyllide a oxygenase. Plant J. 2007, 49: 800-809. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02996.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Lieu PT, Jozsi P, Gilles P, Peterson T: Development of a DNA-labeling system for array-based comparative genomic hybridization. J Biomol Tech. 2005, 16: 104-111.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Price TS, Regan R, Mott R, Hedman A, Honey B, Daniels RJ, Smith L, Greenfield A, Tiganescu A, Buckle V, Ventress N, Ayyub H, Salhan A, Pedraza-Diaz S, Broxholme J, Ragoussis J, Higgs DR, Flint J, Knight SJ: SW-ARRAY: a dynamic programming solution for the identification of copy-number changes in genomic DNA using array comparative genome hybridization data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33: 3455-3464. 10.1093/nar/gki643.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    PO B: Preparation of fluorescent DNA probe from HUMAN mRNA or total RNA using direct incorporation. []

  51. 51.

    Giuntini E, Mengoni A, De FC, Cavalieri D, ubin-Horth N, Landry CR, Becker A, Bazzicalupo M: Large-scale genetic variation of the symbiosis-required megaplasmid pSymA revealed by comparative genomic analysis of Sinorhizobium meliloti natural strains. Bmc Genomics. 2005, 6: 158-10.1186/1471-2164-6-158.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    R statistical computing software . []

  53. 53.

    Smyth GK: Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2004, 3: Article3-

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, Dudoit S, Ellis B, Gautier L, Ge Y, Gentry J, Hornik K, Hothorn T, Huber W, Iacus S, Irizarry R, Leisch F, Li C, Maechler M, Rossini AJ, Sawitzki G, Smith C, Smyth G, Tierney L, Yang JY, Zhang J: Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. 2004, 5: R80-10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r80.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    ArrayExpress database . [[0]]

  56. 56.

    NCBI BLAST home . []

  57. 57.

    Populus trichocarpa genome v1.1 BLAST page . []

  58. 58.

    Grape genome BLAST server . []

  59. 59.

    Moran R: Formulae for Determination of Chlorophyllous Pigments Extracted with N,N-Dimethylformamide. Plant Physiol. 1982, 69: 1376-1381.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Work at Centro de Genómica was supported by INIA grant RTA04-013, INCO contract 015453 and Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia grant AGL2007-65437-C04-01/AGR. We also thank Dr. José Marqués at the Instituto Tecnologico e Nuclear (Sacavem, Portugal) for irradiation with fast neutrons. Help and expertise of A. Almenar, E Blázquez, I. López, I. Sanchís and M. Sancho are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Talón.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

GR carried out the microarray hybridizations, standard PCR reactions, expression measurements, gene sequencing, similarity searches and data analysis, and drafted the manuscript. MAN isolated DNA from Citrus BACs and carried out quantitative real-time PCR. DJI carried out mutant collection screenings, selected mutants and performed chlorophyll measurements. OR-R designed the array-CGH protocol. MG assisted in microarray hybridizations and data analysis. AU provided plant material, identified mutant genotypes and carried out relevant work on the field. MT conceived and coordinated the project and elaborated the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ríos, G., Naranjo, M.A., Iglesias, D.J. et al. Characterization of hemizygous deletions in Citrus using array-Comparative Genomic Hybridization and microsynteny comparisons with the poplar genome. BMC Genomics 9, 381 (2008).

Download citation


  • Fast Neutron
  • Poplar Genome
  • Populus Genome
  • Hemizygous Deletion
  • 39B3 Mutant