Skip to main content
Download PDF

Temporal dynamics of teleost populations during the Pleistocene: a report from publicly available genome data

BMC Genomics volume 22, Article number: 490 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Global climate oscillation, as a selection dynamic, is an ecologically important element resulting in global biodiversity. During the glacial geological periods, most organisms suffered detrimental selection pressures (such as food shortage and habitat loss) and went through population declines. However, during the mild interglacial periods, many species re-flourished. These temporal dynamics of effective population sizes (Ne) provide essential information for understanding and predicting evolutionary outcomes during historical and ongoing global climate changes.

Results

Using high-quality genome assemblies and corresponding sequencing data, we applied the Pairwise Sequentially Markovian Coalescent (PSMC) method to quantify Ne changes of twelve representative teleost species from approximately 10 million years ago (mya) to 10 thousand years ago (kya). These results revealed multiple rounds of population contraction and expansion in most of the examined teleost species during the Neogene and the Quaternary periods. We observed that 83% (10/12) of the examined teleosts had experienced a drastic decline in Ne before the last glacial period (LGP, 110–12 kya), slightly earlier than the reported pattern of Ne changes in 38 avian species. In comparison with the peaks, almost all of the examined teleosts maintained long-term lower Ne values during the last few million years. This is consistent with increasingly dramatic glaciation during this period.

Conclusion

In summary, these findings provide a more comprehensive understanding of the historical Ne changes in teleosts. Results presented here could lead to the development of appropriate strategies to protect species in light of ongoing global climate changes.

Background

Global climate oscillation is an ecologically important element leading to the global biodiversity. Global climate fluctuations can exert a wide range of selection pressures to influence the distribution and proliferation of organisms [1, 2]. In earth’s history there had been five mass extinctions [3], several of which were related to climate change. For example, possible causes for the Ordovician-Silurian extinction events (443.8 mya) include glaciation and volcanism [4]. Moreover, detrimental environmental changes associated with glaciation might have also contributed to this extinction. First, the cooling global climate may have elicited the resident species to an intense greenhouse extinction [5, 6]. Secondly, a reduction in the sea level drained vast epicontinental seaways, most likely destroying the habitats of many endemic communities [7,8,9]. Volcanism released harmful gases and ashes into the atmosphere, thereby causing greenhouse effect, atmosphere darkening, reduction in photosynthesis and atmospheric oxygen, as well as destruction of critical food webs [10]. Nearly all major taxonomic groups on earth were affected during the Ordovician-Silurian extinction event, eliminating 49–60% of marine genera and nearly 85% of marine species [11, 12].

Almost all species are influenced by climate changes and many have developed various responses, such as transference of habitat and alterations in phenotype and genotype [13, 14]. Climatic fluctuations in earth’s past dramatically impacted the demography and distribution of various species. During the glaciation periods, native environmental conditions were destroyed and replaced with ice and permafrost. Consequently, the cooling global climate produced either species extinction or forced species to migrate into new habitats. During the interglacial periods, however, ice and permafrost melted, which provided more suitable habitats for diverse species to recolonize [15, 16].

How to infer the historic changes in effective population size (Ne) has long plagued ambitious researchers. Several practical approaches, such as the Skyline-Plot Methods [17], have been developed to reconstruct demographic history. However, most of these methods only employ a restricted number of marker loci [18, 19], or due to heavy computation requirements they cannot be used for large-scale datasets [20, 21]. With the rapid development of high-throughput sequencing technologies, scientists have generated massive genomic data and maker loci for many target species. This advantageous development, and several other new analytical approaches, have enabled the use of large numbers of loci to infer the changes of Ne. For instance, the pairwise sequential Markovian Coalescent (PSMC) method establishes a model within a single diploid genome inferring the Ne as well as the projected time of the most recent common ancestor (TMRCA [22];). Compared with other methods, PSMC works effectively on resequencing data too. PSMC method produces less potential ascertainment bias and is easier to implement. Unlike other methods with simulations of predefined models (such as parametric structure of times, divergences, and size changes), the PSMC method inferring the Ne for each species does not require any predefined model.

Many genome projects have sought to investigate the relationship between sea levels and the population changes of amphibious fishes [23]. In addition, it has been a focus of research to detect decline or expansion of bird population during the Quaternary period [24, 25]. These studies have attempted to analyze the interaction of population size with geological events [26,27,28]. Nadachowska-Brzyska et al. [24] explored historic population changes in many avian species. For example, it was found that the population size of endangered birds experienced long-term decline. During the Quaternary period, the fluctuation in population size presented consistent correlative characteristics for many bird species. Both extinction and speciation, in fact, coexisted in this period.

However, cold-blooded fishes are more vulnerable than warm-blooded birds to climate changes [29]. Fish metabolic rates are closely linked to body temperature, which are dependent on external temperature conditions [30]. Changes in fish population size are therefore more strongly correlated with climate fluctuations than those observed in birds.

In this paper, the PSMC method was employed to infer population size changes in twelve representative fish species (Table 1), starting from 10 kya up to 10 mya. It was found that multiple rounds of Ne increase and decline occurred in most of the examined fish species. This was predicted to be directly generated by the drastic oscillations in global climate during the Neogene and the Quaternary periods. Ten of the twelve studied fishes had experienced drastic reductions in Ne since the beginning of the last glacial period (LGP, 110–12 kya) [31, 32], which was slightly earlier than the pattern observed in birds [24].

Table 1 Summary of the examined teleost species and their genomes
Full size table

Results

Effective population sizes of representative fishes during the quaternary period

In the present study, genome-wide heterozygosity varied among the twelve representative fish species with high-quality genome assemblies (Fig. 1A). Interestingly, the mean heterozygous sites per nucleotide in the genome sequence of zebrafish (Danio rerio) was 1.1 × 10− 2. This number is much higher than those in other fishes. The zebrafish variant was directly obtained from the Ensembl database, which integrated comprehensive results based on data from different individuals. Hence, this guaranteed the higher sequencing coverage and efficient variant data in zebrafish, possibly contributing to the higher heterozygosity.

Fig. 1
figure1

Demographic history and genome-wide heterozygosity of 12 representative fishes with high-quality genome assemblies. A The boxplot represents the genome-wide heterozygosity that was estimated from genomic 500-kb windows. Genome sizes of the examined fish species were presented by dots. B Historical Ne of the 15 examined fish genomes. The x axis depicts the historical time, and the y axis represents Ne. These plots were scaled using species-specific mutation rates (u) and generation times (g; Table S1). The color of each species is consistent with that of boxplot in (a). Gradient blue bars above the plots represent the glacial periods and the gradient yellow bars represent the interglacial periods. The red smooth line shows the best-fit model with 95% confidence interval. LGP, the last glacial period (110–12 kya)

Full size image

The heterozygous rate per nucleotide in Mexican tetra (Astyanax mexicanus) was about 2 × 10− 4, representing the lowest among these examined fish species. The mean heterozygous rates observed among the three varieties of Asian arowana (Scleropages formosus) were 4.5 × 10− 3, 2.7 × 10− 3 and 2.0 × 10− 3 (golden, green and red arowana), respectively. The rate was 2.0 × 10− 3 for Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaeus), which was greatly reduced compared with the heterozygosity in half-smooth tongue sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis; 5.3 × 10− 3).

The historical Ne values of the twelve representative fish species were inferred using the PSMC approach over a range from 10 kya up to 10 mya (Fig. 1B). The results allow us to track population changes during the Neogene period (2.58–23.03 mya) and the Quaternary period (following the Neogene Period spanning from 2.58 mya to present). Over these periods, the maximal Ne values among the twelve examined fish species had experienced remarkable variations, ranging from 2,000,000 to 6000,000 in blue tilapia (Oreochromis aureus), Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and half-smooth tongue sole; the minimal Ne ranged between 1000 and 6000 (large yellow croaker Larimichthys crocea and Mexican tetra), 50,000–10,000 (Atlantic herring Clupea harengus, channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus, and spotted green pufferfish Tetraodon nigroviridis), and 100,000–200,000 (half-smooth tongue sole, green arowana, and golden arowana). Thus, the Ne values ranged in at least four orders of magnitude among various teleost species during the examined periods.

Ten of the twelve examined fish species demonstrated drastic reductions in Ne at the beginning of the LGP. This either occurred just before the LGP or at the beginning of this period (Fig. 1b). For example, the green arowana reduced from approximately 180,000 individuals at the beginning of the LGP to 9600 by the end of this period. Three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) experienced a dramatic five-fold reduction from approximately 1,540,000 to 31,000 individuals during the same period.

Fluctuations of effective population expansions and contractions

Eleven of the twelve examined fish species in our analysis showed that Ne had changed dramatically over the observation time. Fluctuations of effective population expansions and contractions had considered to be a general feature of most fishes.

More specifically, the Ne among three varieties of Asian arowana varied remarkably (Fig. 2A). Before 2 mya, the three varieties presented relatively similar Ne values. Since then, however, the green arowana had higher Ne values (100,000–240,000) than the other two varieties, reaching the first peak (240,000) at 600–800 kya; after that, it experienced a reduction to 80,000 until approximately 60 kya. The red and the golden arowana demonstrated slight variations with Ne values of 50,000–100,000 until approximately the beginning of the LGP, when the red arowana experienced an undulation of rising steadily first and then falling to 50,000 until 50 kya; however, the golden arowana experienced an opposite trend simultaneously from 70,000 decreasing to around 50,000 and then rising again to 130,000 until 50 kya. At the end of the examined period (until 10 kya), the Ne of golden arowana was approximately three-fold greater than the red arowana and approximately two-fold greater than the green arowana. In our previous study [33], it was predicted that Asian arowana and spotted gar (Lepisosteus oculatus) diverged 384 mya. Since then, three varieties diverged approximately 1–4 mya to evolve as an independent lineage (Figure S1). Green arowana diverged from the other two varieties approximately 3.8 mya, and the latter two varieties diverged approximately 1.7 mya. The Ne variations could briefly reflect the evolutionary trajectories of this fish species. Prior to 2 mya, three varieties of arowana had similar population sizes with a slightly lower value in the red arowana, implying that these arowana varieties could belong to the same lineage before 2 mya. Subsequently, the green arowana diverged from the other two varieties and experienced a different evolutionary process, with a remarkable expansion in population (the first and second peaks). Although the red arowana diverged from the golden arowana approximately 1.7 mya, both varieties experienced similar changes in Ne from 1 mya.

Fig. 2
figure2

Fluctuations of Effective Population Expansions and Contractions. The pink curves represent PSMC estimates for 100 bootstrapped sequences. The light blue line indicates changes of the Northern hemisphere air temperature [32]. The gradient blue bars above the plots represent the glacial periods and the gradient yellow bars represent the interglacial periods. “g” is the generation time of each species. A Arowanas. B Catfishes. C Nile tilapia. D Blue tilapia. E Half-smooth tongue sole and Japanese flounder. F Atlantic herring. G Spotted green pufferfish. H Medaka

Full size image

In 2016, Liu et al. [34] completed the genome sequencing project of channel catfish (from an American population), and generated a draft reference genome assembly with a total length of 783 Mb and a scaffold N50 of 7.7 Mb. Subsequently, we reported another high-quality genome assembly of channel catfish (from a Chinese population; Chen et al., 2016), with approximately 845 Mb in total length and a scaffold N50 of 7.2 Mb (see Table 1). Although the Chinese population has been recognized as the introduction from America, genetic characteristics of the Chinese population seem to be significant different from the American counterpart after 30 years of artificial breeding in China [35]. These differences were also witnessed from the present prediction of the temporal dynamics in the Ne. The similar trend of Ne was observed from 10 to 100 kya; prior to that, the tendencies of Ne for both populations experienced dramatic differences (see Fig. 2B). The heterozygosity in the Chinese population was 0.2%, which was higher than the American population (0.155%). These results confirmed the observed differences at a genomic level between the two populations.

Nile tilapia had a stable Ne (around 1000,000) until approximately 1 mya, when it increased to a peak of 2,500,000 around 300 kya. Subsequently, Nile tilapia experienced a drastic reduction in Ne to 200,000 within the LGP (see Fig. 2C). Recently, a high-quality genome assembly of another tilapia species, blue tilapia (Oreochromis aureus), was reported by us [36], which had a significant variation in population size compared to the Nile tilapia (Fig. 2D). More specifically, from 6 to 2 mya the Ne of the blue tilapia presented an approximately 6-fold increase (at the peak) around 2–3 mya, when it reached 5,700,000 at 2 mya. During the following 1 million years, the Ne of blue tilapia declined rapidly. Since then, the population size of blue tilapia has never recovered, but it was steadily declining to less than 200,000. The two sequenced tilapia species diverged approximately 23.2 mya [36], suggesting that they had experienced different evolutionary processes during the examined period. The population of blue tilapia flourished until the junction of the Neogene and Quaternary periods. However, blue tilapia experienced one cycle of population expansion and contraction (see Fig. 2D). Possibly due to the decline in temperature within the LGP and the low tolerance to low temperature, the two tilapias had low Ne values during the LGP (see more details in Fig. 2C and D).

The effective population size of two sequenced flatfish species, half-smooth tongue sole and Japanese flounder, also were fluctuating (Fig. 2E). Before the LGP, the two Pleuronectiformes species had similar trends of the Ne, with a steady increase over time. Both flatfishes experienced a sharp decline since the beginning of LGP. The Ne of Japanese flounder reached its lowest level around 100 kya, which was 1 kya earlier than the half-smooth tongue sole. The most significant variance between the two flatfishes occurred 60 kya, when the population of the half-smooth tongue sole was maintained at the lowest level while the population of the Japanese flounder rapidly increased to high levels.

The population sizes varied significantly in Atlantic herring (Fig. 2F) and spotted green pufferfish (Fig. 2G) over time, especially within the LGP. The Ne values of these two fish reached peaks at 0.2–1 mya. Interestingly, the increase in populations was observed in these species during the LGP. Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes; Fig. 2H) demonstrated Ne changes within a shorter period than the other species. We therefore propose that the low coverage of SNP data set (Supplementary Table S1) may contribute to this phenomenon.

Other teleost species

Four fish species with a shorter generation time, including stickleback, zebrafish, Mexican tetra and fugu (Takifugu rubripes), presented similar population trends (Fig. 3). Each species showed a population rise at first and then a decline with differing times to reach peak size. The peak population of stickleback (Fig. 3A) reached 1,550,000 at the beginning of the LGP; in contrast, zebrafish (Fig. 3B) and Mexican tetra (Fig. 3C) trended to reach peaks approximately 0.4 mya. However, fugu (Fig. 3D), comparable with medaka (Fig. 2H), also showed Ne changes within a shorter period than the other species (Figs. 2 and 3).

Fig. 3
figure3

Temporal dynamics of effective population size for other teleost species. The pink curves in each sub-plot represent PSMC estimates for 100 bootstrapped sequences. The light blue line indicates changes of the Northern hemisphere air temperature [32]. The gradient blue bars above the plots represent the glacial periods and the gradient yellow bars represent the interglacial periods. “g” is the generation time of each species. A Stickleback. B Zebrafish. C Mexican tetra. D Fugu

Full size image

Discussion

Global climatic oscillations have been shown to play a vital role in the proliferation and colonization of life on our planet [37]. Five mass extinctions have been identified previously in earth’s history, primarily related to dramatic climate changes [3]. Uncovering temporal dynamics of effective population size can help better understand evolution in light of global climate variations [37]. Predictions of historical population sizes can also improve us to evaluate the impact of human activities on biodiversity [38].

The effective use of public genome datasets in evaluating fish population sizes

The PSMC method, relying on whole-genome variation information, has been developed as an efficient approach to calculate the Ne value of any organism [22]. For example, Tollis et al. [39] compared the demographic difference between two species of Atlantic Humpback whales based on the PSMC calculation. They concluded that the difference between PSMC trajectories may be caused by recent admixture, intraspecific variation, and population structure. Conversely, errors generated by variations in the sequence coverage may also contribute in part to the predicted difference. Barth et al. [40] revealed similar demographic histories of Atlantic and Indo-Pacific yellowfin tuna, suggesting that the two populations diverged only recently. We and our collaborators also applied PSMC to analyze the Ne of the Kanglang white minnow [26], and concluded that the population demography was highly consistent within the three development periods of local habitat in the Fuxian Lake. In addition, our research group reported the first genome assemblies of amphibious fishes for three mudskipper species [23]. In this interesting study, a tight correlation between demographic expansion (or bottleneck events) and sea-level fluctuations was well established in two representative mudskippers.

Here, with public availability of high-quality genome assemblies and sequencing data (Table S1), PSMC was used to predict the temporal dynamics of several representative fish species. Our results presented here depicted multiple rounds of population contraction and expansion in most examined fish species during the Neogene and the Quaternary periods (Fig. S2). In fact, 83% (10/12) of the fish examined showed a drastic reduction in the Ne values before the beginning of the LGP (110–12 kya). Nearly all of the examined species had a lower Ne during recent periods, in comparison to the peak(s), which can be explained by increasingly dramatic glaciation over the past few million years. These results provide a comprehensive summary of the historical Ne changes in various fishes, which can also help us to protect endangered species amidst future global climate changes.

The overall correlation between climate change and variations in Ne

Multiple rounds of Ne increase and decline were observed in most of the examined fish species. These observations may potentially be related to the drastic variations in global climate that occurred during the Neogene and the Quaternary periods. Over several million years, climatic glaciation movements appeared in a relatively fixed order and the cycle repeated every 100,000 years or less [32]. Consequently, fish species were forced to adapt to new environmental circumstances during interglacial periods. Climatic glaciation movements may have contributed to the severe decline in population sizes, or even in some cases of extinction. During the mild interglacial periods, however, the population sizes recovered rapidly (see more details in Fig. 1B).

In our present study, we observed a reduction pattern that appeared in most studied fishes since the beginning of the LGP. This reduction pattern was also observed in birds [24] with a slight difference at the beginning of the decline. We also observed that the overall Ne slowly recovered since 20 kya (Figures S2), especially in those fishes with fluctuations of effective population expansions and contractions.

During 100 kya to 1 mya, the alternating glacial and interglacial periods might have impacted on the Ne in several species, which live on the upper of water with warmer water temperature. For example, we observed a significant climbing of Ne in Nile tilapia during this period; oppositely, when experiencing the cold climate, its Ne declined dramatically (Fig. 2C). Nile tilapia, native to tropical West Africa, is a tropical species that prefers to live in the temperature ranging from 31 to 36 °C. It’s spawning only occurs when the water temperature reaches up to 24 °C [41]. Thus, the colder temperature contracted the Ne dramatically during glacial periods. This pattern was also confirmed in half-smooth tongue sole, Japanese flounder (Fig. 2D), spotted green pufferfish (Fig. 2G), stickleback (Fig. 3A) and Mexican tetra (Fig. 3C). However, during 1mya to 10 mya, no clear pattern was determined to discern the Ne in most of examined fishes.

Ambiguous correlations between heterozygosity and effective population size

Whole-genome heterozygosity has been widely accepted as a measure of genetic variation in many species [42]. Heterozygosity also provides useful information of long-term Ne changes [43]. A high-level of heterozygosity usually represents a large Ne value, as only sufficiently large populations can harbor extensive genetic diversity [44]. In contrast, a low-level of heterozygosity reflects a small Ne, as small populations may easily lose genetic diversity [42]. Based on a probabilistic model of coalescence with recombination and variations in heterozygosity over time, the PSMC algorithm can predict Ne values in any individual diploid species.

In our present study, an unclear relationship was drawn between heterozygosity and Ne. For example, zebrafish showed the highest level of heterozygous sites among the examined species. However, its Ne values, whether the peak of Ne or the amplitude of variation, in zebrafish were not the most remarkable when compared with the other examined fishes (Fig. 3B). Zebrafish experienced only one round of Ne increasing and decreasing, in comparison with multiple rounds of observed fluctuations in most other species (Figs. 2 and 3).

In the practice of PSMC analysis, mutation rate estimation can be a predictor of sequence biodiversity. Purifying selection, like inbreeding and genetic drift, can lead to reduction of heterozygosity and thereby loss of heterozygous sites [45]. Practically speaking, mutations in the PSMC analysis are independent of one another. The influence of reduced heterozygosity due to selection is correlated to the results of a reduced mutation rate.

Low coverage of genomic regions can also lead to an underestimation of Ne [46]. For those diploid genomes with low coverage of sequencing, heterozygotes will be randomly lost due to the lack of coverage of both alleles. This also has a similar effect as the lower mutation rate [47]. In our present study, Mexican tetra and medaka with the lowest genomic coverage (86.2 and 79.3%, respectively; Supplementary Table S1) exhibited a shorter period of Ne (Fig. 3C and Fig. 2H).

Drawbacks of the PSMC method

We observed a poor performance of the PSMC method when it was implemented for non-natural species. In this paper, we operated PSMC for two channel catfish that were considered with the same origin. However, the Ne values in the two fishes didn’t show similar patterns. Thus, the output of PSMC could become unreliable when natural species experienced artificial selection within tens of generations. During the process of artificial selection, various traits with economic values could be manually selected and then reinforced throughout numerous generations. This process indeed modifies the original genomic feature, which will destroy the PSMC analysis from the beginning stage. Therefore, when using PSMC to infer Ne values, we should consider whether the examined species is natural or not.

Similar to any other population genetics method for analyzing high-throughput genomic sequencing data, the PSMC is influenced by sequencing errors and missing data [46]. Genotyping sites with low coverage can lead to misidentification of heterozygous sites, which will be classified as false positives [48]. By comparing different degrees of genome-wide coverage and missing data rate in black-and-white Ficedula flycatchers, Nadachowska-Brzyska et al. [25] proposed that the appropriate genome-wide coverage should be higher than 18-fold with less than 25% of missing data for a reasonable PSMC analysis.

With the exception of the quality of sequencing data, the parameter estimation for PSMC may also play a critical role in demographic analysis, such as using the scaling parameters for an explanation of the results. Proper mutation rate (u) and generation time (g) are the prerequisites for scaling the outputs of PSMC analyses. Thus, if these two parameters are misjudged, any PSMC analysis would become tendentious. Fortunately, however, both mutation rate and generation time affect the PSMC results in a fixed manner. The principal pattern of a PSMC curve can be corrected by sliding the target curve along the axes [24]. In our present study, the divergence time estimation was accurate, which is consistent with the analyses of multiple nuclear gene sequences [49] and Fish T1K transcriptomes [50]. With the literature supported generation time (Table S2), our PSMC analysis generated trustful outputs.

Despite its wide usage, the PSMC method is restricted to a limited number of samples. This may lead to an impossible inference of recent population size history. PopSizeABC, a new Bayesian computational approach, uses a large set of samples and allows an inference to the evolution of the Ne over recent time [51]. In contrast to the PSMC with only reconstruction of the scenarios before 10 kya, this novel method can infer the most recent (even the last 100 generations) population size of any examined species. This method uses a small number of statistics related to allele frequencies and linkage disequilibrium. Recently, the PopSizeABC method has been well applied in four cattle breeds and in an endangered bird, the crested ibis [52].

Conclusions

The temporal dynamics of Ne provide essential information for interpreting and projecting evolutionary outcomes during the global climate changes. Using high-quality genome assemblies and corresponding sequencing data, we implemented PSMC method to estimate the Ne changes of twelve representative teleosts from approximately 10 mya to 10 kya. Multiple rounds of population contraction and expansion in most of the examined species were observed during the Neogene and the Quaternary periods. In comparison with the peaks, almost all of the teleosts maintained long-term lower Ne values during the last few million years, which reflect the increasingly dramatic glaciation during this period. Our study provides a more comprehensive understanding of the historical Ne changes in teleosts. Results could be meaningful for the protection of species in light of ongoing global climate changes.

Methods

Genome data collection

For these public teleost sequencing projects, relevant genome data (Table 1) were downloaded from several public databases, including NCBI, Ensembl, and several professional databases (such as the Grass Carp Genome Project). The genome assembly and raw sequencing data of each fish species were obtained individually (see more details in Tables 1 and S1).

Heterozygous SNP calling and heterozygosity estimation

For each species, the ALN module of Burrows-Wheeler Alignment (BWA) v0.7.12 [53] was used with default parameters to align raw sequencing data (Table S1) with the corresponding genome assembly (Table 1). Subsequently, Picard-tools v1.117 (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/) “SortSam” and “MarkDuplicates” were used to sort and delete duplicates in the alignment output. Then, Samtools v1.5 [54] “mpileup” module with the parameter “-C50” and the Bcftools v1.5 [54] “call” module with the parameter “-vmO v -V indels” were used to generate the raw SNP dataset. Based on the average mapping depth of reads, the minimal read depth was set to one third of the average mapping depth and the maximal depth was set to twice the average mapping depth in order to discard low-quality SNP markers. Using a local Perl script, SNPs with the distance to the next marker less than 10 bp was discarded. The final dataset of refined heterozygous SNPs was obtained for each species examined. The heterozygosity rate of each species was calculated based on the number of heterozygous SNPs and the genome size of each species.

Mutation rate estimation

To obtain the mutation rate of each species, a divergence time tree of related species (Figure S1) was constructed. For this analysis, the protein coding sequences of teleosts were collected from reported genome assemblies (Table 1). In total, a 628 one-to-one orthologues gene set was generated from 22 species by using the Blastp (Altschul et al., 1990) and Hcluster_sg [55] with a parameter of “-w 10 -s 0.34”. The Bayesian Inference (BI) method was applied to perform phylogenomic analyses. MrMTgui [56] program was employed to complete the best-fit nucleotide substitution model test. The general time reversible (GTR) model with optimization of substitution rates and Gamma model of rate heterogeneity (GTR + I + G) were the best-fits. Finally, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using MrBayes v3.1.2 [57] with the parameter setting as “ngen = 100,000”. Branch support confidence was assessed by Bayesian posterior probabilities. Based on the topology generated from the phylogenomic analysis, the divergence time of these species was inferred by applying the Mcmctree module of PAML package [58] with the parameter “clock = 2, model = 4”. Six branch nodes were calibrated using fossil records (Figure S1).

Almost all of our divergence age estimations were accurate. We estimated that the P. formosa diverged with X. maculatus at 9.4–27.9 mya, which agrees with the analyses of multiple nuclear gene sequences [49] and Fish T1K transcriptomes [50]. We estimated the divergence time between the Ostariophysi (D. rerio and I. punctatus) and the Clupeiformes at 242.3 mya (95% interval: 211.5–272.0 mya), which is also consistent with the above-mentioned analyses. The divergence time between I. punctatus and A. mexicanus was 118 mya (95% HPD interval: 104.6–143.4 mya), which is also validated in the above-mentioned analyses. The accurate divergence time estimations (Table S2) indicated our mutation rate calculation more convincingly.

For the second step, the zebrafish genome was used as the reference to obtain whole-genome level pairwise alignments between zebrafish and other fish species using the LASTZ program v1.02.00 [59] with the parameter setting as “--step = 19 --hspthresh = 2200 --inner = 2000 --ydrop = 3400 --gappedthresh = 10,000 --format = axt”. The length of alignment block without any gaps was ascertained and Ns was counted. The number of variation sites in each alignment block was also counted. The following formula was applied to calculate the mutation rate of each fish: u = Nv/Len/2 t, where u is the mutation rate, Nv is the number of variation sites, Len is the length of the alignment block, and t is the divergence time between zebrafish and each examined species based on the phylogenomic analysis (Table S2).

Demographic history

To predict the demographic history of each fish species, the pairwise sequentially Markovian Coalescent (PSMC) model [22] was applied with the parameter “-N 30 -t 15 -r 5 -b -p “4 + 10*1 + 20*2 + 4 + 6″“. Only those heterozygous SNP loci with minor allele frequency (MAF) ≥ 0.2 were used. Subsequently, 100 bootstraps were operated for each species to examine the variance in Ne estimates. Finally, the results were scaled by using the generation time and mutation rate of each species to construct the demographic history from 10 kya to 10 mya. The figures for the demographic history of each fish species were generated by gnuplot (http://www.gnuplot.info/).

Availability of data and materials

Raw sequencing and genome data were previously published by different studies. The repository information for each species can be found in Table 1 and Supplementary Table S3. All datasets generated by analyses during this study are additionally available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BI:

Bayesian Inference

BWA:

Burrows-Wheeler Alignment

g :

Generation time

GTR:

General time reversible

kya:

Thousand years ago

LGP:

Last glacial period

MAF:

Minor allele frequency

mya:

Million years ago

N e :

Effective population sizes

PSMC:

Pairwise Sequentially Markovian Coalescent

TMRCA:

Time of the most recent common ancestor

u :

Mutation rate

References

  1. 1.

    Hewitt G. The genetic legacy of the quaternary ice ages. Nature. 2000;405(6789):907.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hewitt G. Genetic consequences of climatic oscillations in the quaternary. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 2004;359(1442):183–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Alroy J. Colloquium paper: dynamics of origination and extinction in the marine fossil record. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(Suppl 1):11536–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    McGhee GR, Sheehan PM, Bottjer DJ, Droser ML. Ecological ranking of Phanerozoic biodiversity crises: the Serpukhovian (early carboniferous) crisis had a greater ecological impact than the end-Ordovician. Geology. 2012;40(2):147–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Trotter JA, Williams IS, Barnes CR, Lécuyer C, Nicoll RS. Did cooling oceans trigger Ordovician biodiversification? Evidence from conodont thermometry. Science. 2008;321(5888):550–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Finnegan S, Heim NA, Peters SE, Fischer WW. Climate change and the selective signature of the late Ordovician mass extinction. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(18):6829–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Johnson ME. Relationship of Silurian Sea-level fluctuations to oceanic episodes and events. GFF. 2006;128(2):115–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Finney SC, Berry WB, Cooper JD, Ripperdan RL, Sweet WC, Jacobson SR, et al. Late Ordovician mass extinction: a new perspective from stratigraphic sections in Central Nevada. Geology. 1999;27(3):215–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Munnecke A, Calner M, Harper DAT, Servais T. Ordovician and Silurian Sea–water chemistry, sea level, and climate: a synopsis. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 2010;296(3):389–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Young SA, Saltzman MR, Foland KA, Linder JS, Kump LR. A major drop in seawater 87Sr/86Sr during the middle Ordovician (Darriwilian): links to volcanism and climate? Geology. 2009;37(10):951–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Erwin DH. The end and the beginning: recoveries from mass extinctions. Trends Ecol Evol. 1998;13(9):344–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Sheehan PM. The late Ordovician mass extinction. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci. 2001;29(1):331–64.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Peñuelas J, Sardans J, Estiarte M, Ogaya R, Carnicer J, Coll M, et al. Evidence of current impact of climate change on life: a walk from genes to the biosphere. Glob Chang Biol. 2013;19(8):2303–38.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Rivas-Ubach A, Sardans J, Pérez-Trujillo M, Estiarte M, Peñuelas J. Strong relationship between elemental stoichiometry and metabolome in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(11):4181–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Gitay H, Suárez A, Watson RT, Dokken DJ. Climate change and biodiversity; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lorenzen ED, Nogués-Bravo D, Orlando L, Weinstock J, Binladen J, Marske KA, et al. Species-specific responses of Late Quaternary megafauna to climate and humans. Nature. 2011;479(7373):359.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ho SY, Shapiro B. Skyline-plot methods for estimating demographic history from nucleotide sequences. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011;11(3):423–34.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Drummond AJ, Rambaut A, Shapiro B, Pybus OG. Bayesian coalescent inference of past population dynamics from molecular sequences. Mol Biol Evol. 2005;22(5):1185–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Pybus OG, Rambaut A, Harvey PH. An integrated framework for the inference of viral population history from reconstructed genealogies. Genetics. 2000;155(3):1429–37.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Beaumont MA. Approximate Bayesian computation in evolution and ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2010;41:379–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Csilléry K, Blum MG, Gaggiotti OE, François O. Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) in practice. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010;25(7):410–8.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Li H, Durbin R. Inference of human population history from individual whole-genome sequences. Nature. 2011;475(7357):493.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    You X, Bian C, Zan Q, Xu X, Liu X, Chen J, et al. Mudskipper genomes provide insights into the terrestrial adaptation of amphibious fishes. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5594.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Nadachowska-Brzyska K, Li C, Smeds L, Zhang G, Ellegren H. Temporal dynamics of avian populations during Pleistocene revealed by whole-genome sequences. Curr Biol. 2015;25(10):1375–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Nadachowska-Brzyska K, Burri R, Smeds L, Ellegren H. PSMC analysis of effective population sizes in molecular ecology and its application to black-and-white Ficedula flycatchers. Mol Ecol. 2016;25(5):1058–72.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Jiang W, Qiu Y, Pan X, Zhang Y, Wang X, Lv Y, et al. Genome Assembly for a Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau “3E” Fish, Anabarilius grahami (Regan), and Its Evolutionary and Genetic Applications. Front Genet. 2018;9:614.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Yang J, Chen X, Bai J, Fang D, Qiu Y, Jiang W, et al. The Sinocyclocheilus cavefish genome provides insights into cave adaptation. BMC Biol. 2016;14:1.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kang J, Ma X, He S. Population genetics analysis of the Nujiang catfish Creteuchiloglanis macropterus through a genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms resource generated by RAD-seq. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):2813.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bradley MJ, Kutz SJ, Jenkins E, O’hara TM. The potential impact of climate change on infectious diseases of Arctic fauna. Int J Circ Health. 2005;64(5):468–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ohlberger J, Mehner T, Staaks G, Hölker F. Intraspecific temperature dependence of the scaling of metabolic rate with body mass in fishes and its ecological implications. Oikos. 2012;121(2):245–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Andersen KK, Azuma N, Barnola J-M, Bigler M, Biscaye P, Caillon N, et al. High-resolution record of northern hemisphere climate extending into the last interglacial period. Nature. 2004;431(7005):147.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Rahmstorf S. Ocean circulation and climate during the past 120,000 years. Nature. 2002;419(6903):207–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Bian C, Hu Y, Ravi V, Kuznetsova IS, Shen X, Mu X, et al. The Asian arowana (Scleropages formosus) genome provides new insights into the evolution of an early lineage of teleosts. Sci Rep. 2016;6:24501.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Liu Z, Liu S, Yao J, Bao L, Zhang J, Li Y, et al. The channel catfish genome sequence provides insights into the evolution of scale formation in teleosts. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11757.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Zhong L, Song C, Chen X, Deng W, Xiao Y, Wang M, et al. Channel catfish in China: historical aspects, current status, and problems. Aquaculture. 2016;465:367–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Bian C, Li J, Lin X, Chen X, Yi Y, You X, et al. Whole Genome Sequencing of the Blue Tilapia (Oreochromis aureus) Provides a Valuable Genetic Resource for Biomedical Research on Tilapias. Marine Drugs. 2019;17:7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Bellard C, Bertelsmeier C, Leadley P, Thuiller W, Courchamp F. Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecol Lett. 2012;15(4):365–77.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Pauls SU, Nowak C, Bálint M, Pfenninger M. The impact of global climate change on genetic diversity within populations and species. Mol Ecol. 2013;22(4):925–46.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Tollis M, Robbins J, Webb AE, Kuderna LFK, Caulin AF, Garcia JD, et al. Return to the sea, get huge, beat Cancer: an analysis of cetacean genomes including an assembly for the humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae). Mol Biol Evol. 2019;36(8):1746–63.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Barth JMI, Damerau M, Matschiner M, Jentoft S, Hanel R. Genomic differentiation and demographic histories of Atlantic and indo-Pacific yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) populations. Genome Biol Evol. 2017;9(4):1084.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Popma TJ, Lovshin LL. Worldwide prospects for commercial production of tilapia: International Center for Aquaculture and Aquatic Environments Auburn, Ala; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Allendorf FW. Genetic drift and the loss of alleles versus heterozygosity. Zoo biology. 1986;5(2):181–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Motro U, Thomson G. On heterozygosity and the effective size of populations subject to size changes. Evolution. 1982;36(5):1059–66.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Caballero A. Developments in the prediction of effective population size. Heredity. 1994;73(6):657.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Palkopoulou E, Mallick S, Skoglund P, Enk J, Rohland N, Li H, et al. Complete genomes reveal signatures of demographic and genetic declines in the woolly mammoth. Curr Biol. 2015;25(10):1395–400.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Han E, Sinsheimer JS, Novembre J. Characterizing bias in population genetic inferences from low-coverage sequencing data. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;31(3):723–35.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Wheeler DA, Srinivasan M, Egholm M, Shen Y, Chen L, McGuire A, et al. The complete genome of an individual by massively parallel DNA sequencing. Nature. 2008;452(7189):872.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Alex Buerkle C, Gompert Z. Population genomics based on low coverage sequencing: how low should we go? Mol Ecol. 2013;22(11):3028–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Near TJ, Eytan RI, Dornburg A, Kuhn KL, Moore JA, Davis MP, et al. Resolution of ray-finned fish phylogeny and timing of diversification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(34):13698–703.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Hughes LC, Ortí G, Huang Y, Sun Y, Baldwin CC, Thompson AW, et al. Comprehensive phylogeny of ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii) based on transcriptomic and genomic data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(24):6249–54.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Boitard S, Rodriguez W, Jay F, Mona S, Austerlitz F. Inferring population size history from large samples of genome-wide molecular data-an approximate Bayesian computation approach. PLoS Genet. 2016;12(3):e1005877.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Feng S, Fang Q, Barnett R, Li C, Han S, Kuhlwilm M, et al. The genomic footprints of the fall and recovery of the crested ibis. Curr Biol. 2019;29(2):340–349.e347.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. bioinformatics. 2009;25(14):1754–60.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(16):2078–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Birney E, Clamp M, Durbin R. GeneWise and Genomewise. Genome Res. 2004;14(5):988–95.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Nuin P. MrMTgui. v 1.0. MrModelTest/ModelTest Graphical interface for Windows/Linux; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 2012;61(3):539–42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Yang Z. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24(8):1586–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Schwartz S, Kent WJ, Smit A, Zhang Z, Baertsch R, Hardison RC, et al. Human–mouse alignments with BLASTZ. Genome Res. 2003;13(1):103–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to all the authors for their contributions to the study.

Funding

This research was supported by Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Program for International Cooperation (no. GJHZ20190819152407214).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jia Li and Chao Bian contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Shenzhen Key Lab of Marine Genomics, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Molecular Breeding in Marine Economic Animals, BGI Academy of Marine Sciences, BGI Marine, BGI, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

    Jia Li, Chao Bian, Yunhai Yi, Hui Yu, Xinxin You & Qiong Shi

  2. Center of Reproduction, Development and Aging, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macau, China

    Chao Bian

  3. BGI Education Center, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

    Yunhai Yi, Xinxin You & Qiong Shi

  4. Laboratory of Aquatic Genomics, College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

    Qiong Shi

Authors
  1. Jia Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chao Bian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yunhai Yi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hui Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xinxin You
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Qiong Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Q.S. and J.L. conceived the project. J.L. analyzed the data. C.B., Y.Y., H.Y., and X.Y. participated in data analysis and discussion. J.L. wrote the manuscript. Q.S. revised the manuscript. All authors approved submission of the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jia Li or Qiong Shi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Statistics of the aligned sequencing data. Table S2. Mutation rates and generation times of the examined fish species. Table S3. The SRA data of the examined fish species used in this study. Figure S1. The divergence time tree of 22 representative species. Tropical clawed frog (X. tropicalis) was used as the outgroup. The branch nodes with crimson dots were calibrated by using reported fossil records. Figure S2. Historical Ne in different aspects.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, J., Bian, C., Yi, Y. et al. Temporal dynamics of teleost populations during the Pleistocene: a report from publicly available genome data. BMC Genomics 22, 490 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-021-07816-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Global climate change
  • Temporal dynamics
  • Effective population size
  • High-quality genome assembly
  • Teleost

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us