Skip to main content

Comparative profiling of the transcriptional response to iron restriction in six serotypes of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae with different virulence potential



Comparative analysis of gene expression among serotypes within a species can provide valuable information on important differences between related genomes. For the pig lung pathogen Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, 15 serotypes with a considerable variation in virulence potential and immunogenicity have been identified. This serotypic diversity can only partly be explained by amount of capsule and differences in the RTX toxin genes in their genomes. Iron acquisition in vivo is an important bacterial function and in pathogenic bacteria, iron-limitation is often a signal for the induction of virulence genes. We used a pan-genomic microarray to study the transcriptional response to iron restriction in vitro in six serotypes of A. pleuropneumoniae (1, 2, 3, 5b, 6, and 7), representing at least two levels of virulence.


In total, 45 genes were significantly (p < 0.0001) up-regulated and 67 genes significantly down-regulated in response to iron limitation. Not previously observed in A. pleuropneumoniae was the up-regulation of a putative cirA-like siderophore in all six serotypes. Three genes, recently described in A. pleuropneumoniae as possibly coding for haemoglobin-haptoglobin binding proteins, displayed significant serotype related up-regulation to iron limitation. For all three genes, the expression appeared at its lowest in serotype 3, which is generally considered one of the least virulent serotypes of A. pleuropneumoniae. The three genes share homology with the hmbR haemoglobin receptor of Neisseria meningitidis, a possible virulence factor which contributes to bacterial survival in rats.


By comparative analysis of gene expression among 6 different serotypes of A. pleuropneumoniae we identified a common set of presumably essential core genes, involved in iron regulation. The results support and expand previous observations concerning the identification of new potential iron acquisition systems in A. pleuropneumoniae, showing that this bacterium has evolved several strategies for scavenging the limited iron resources of the host. The combined effect of iron-depletion and serotype proved to be modest, indicating that serotypes of both moderate and high virulence at least in vitro are reacting almost identical to iron restriction. One notable exception, however, is the haemoglobin-haptoglobin binding protein cluster which merits further investigation.


Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, is a Gram-negative, facultative anaerobic coccobacillus of the Pasteurellaceae family [1]. It is the causative agent of porcine pleuropneumonia. This highly infectious disease causes impaired animal welfare and serious economic losses in the swine industry, world-wide. The infection can lead to both peracute disease with rapid death and chronic infection resulting in asymptomatic carriers [2]. Based on differences in capsular polysaccharides, 15 serotypes have been recognized [3]. The serotypes differ greatly in both virulence potential, immunogenicity and in geographical distribution [48]. Due to differences in immunogenicity, vaccines raised against one serotype do not provide protection from infection by other serotypes [8].

A number of virulence factors have been described for A. pleuropneumoniae[2, 911]. Serotype variations in virulence potential seem to be primarily governed by the amount of capsule and the combination of RTX toxins, denoted apxI, apxII, and apxIII, produced by the individual serotypes [12, 13]. The most virulent combination, apxI and apxII, is produced by serotypes 1, 5, 9, and 11. ApxII and apxIII are found in the medium virulent serotypes 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 15. The remaining serotypes produce one toxin: apxII by serotypes 7, 12, and 13 and apxI by serotypes 10, and 14 [12]. Serotypes 7 and 12 are also considered to be of medium virulence, while serotypes 10, 13 and 14 are only rarely isolated from disease [4, 14]. Still, observations of variation in pathogenic potential, even among serotypes and strains expressing the same apx toxins, indicate that other virulence determinants must be contributing to the observed differences in pathogenesis [2, 1517]. Serotype 3 is generally believed to be less virulent than the remaining types [4, 18], although some serotype 3 strains showed no difference in pathogenicity when compared to other apxII/apxIII producing serotypes [7, 17].

An important virulence factor for bacteria is the ability to survive and grow in an iron-limited environment [2]. Iron is involved in metabolic pathways, respiration, oxygen transport, DNA synthesis and synthesis of metabolites [19, 20] and is critical to the invading microorganisms for establishing infection. As part of the innate defense, the mammalian host keeps the levels of intracellular free iron to around 10-18M which is insufficient to allow bacterial growth [19]. The low level of free iron in the host is maintained by high affinity proteins such as transferrin, lactoferrin, haem, haemoglobin (Hb), and ferritin [19].

Like other pathogens, A. pleuropneumoniae has adapted a number of strategies for scavenging host iron. The bacterium is able to use porcine transferrin as well as haem proteins as sole sources of iron. A. pleuropneumoniae genes known to be involved in iron uptake are the porcine transferrin specific outer membrane (OM) proteins, tbpA and tbpB, the co-transcribed tonB-exbB-exbD complex [2123], and the second tonB system, designated exbB2-exbD2-tonB2[24]. Solely responsible for the Hb uptake in A. pleuropneumoniae is the haemoglobin binding protein, hgbA[25]. The presence of a periplasmic binding protein-dependent transport system, homologuous to yfeABCD of Yersinia pestis has been documented in A. pleuropneumoniae and other Pasteurellaceae species [2629]. A gene cluster sharing homology with the HmbR Hb receptor from N. meningitides has recently been identified by microarray analysis [26]. In A. pleuropneumoniae, the putative Actinobacillus ferric uptake operon, afuABC, and the siderophore ferrichrome uptake, fhu, receptor are not regulated by iron-levels [3033].

In many bacteria the intracellular iron level and utilization is controlled by the balance between the regulatory protein, fur (ferric-uptake regulator protein), and ryhB [20, 34]. Fur is a global gene regulator involved in numerous functions of the cell, such as respiration, glycolysis, purine metabolism, and redox-stress resistance [20]. It represses transcription upon interaction with its co-repressor Fe2+, and causes de-repression in the absence of Fe2+[19]. The fur regulated ryhB, a small non-coding RNA (sRNA), acts by repressing iron-using proteins under iron-restricted conditions [20]. Whether ryhB or other sRNAs are involved in the regulatory response of Pasteurellaceae remains to be demonstrated. Recently, however, homologues of the global sRNA regulator, Hfq, a key factor in regulations by sRNAs in bacteria, has also been identified in A. pleuropneumoniae, P. multocida, and H. influenza[35]. Among the many Hfq-dependent regulators is ryhB [35].

Microarray analysis of gene regulation under iron restriction have been studied in A. pleuropneumoniae, Pasteurella multocida, Haemophilus influenza, Mannheimia haemolytica, and Haemophilus parasuis, respectively [2629, 36]. Presently, however, the knowledge of intra-species variation in response to iron deprivation is limited for the Pasteurellaceae family. Only few comparative transcriptional profiling studies have been performed in this group and none for A. pleuropneumoniae[37]. We used an in vitro model system to compare the response of moderate (serotypes 2, 3, 6, 7), and highly virulent strains (serotypes 1 and 5) of A. pleuropneumoniae to the iron restricted conditions found in the porcine host. The primary aims were: 1) to identify any variations in the transcriptional response among the serotypes which might contribute to the explanation of the observed differences in virulence, 2) to identify a set of genes defining the core modulon of A. pleuropneumoniae in response to iron limitation, 3) to develop a valid method for transcriptional comparison of multiple serotypes.

Results & Discussion

Microarray analysis of A. pleuropneumoniae iron regulation

Based on all the sequence information available for A. pleuropneumoniae, we designed a pan-genomic microarray, targeting the A. pleuropneumoniae serotypes 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7, respectively. This array was used to study the gene expression of all the above mentioned serotypes in response to iron limitation. The study set-up was established in a previous investigation [38]. Briefly, gene expression of bacteria grown for 30 min in the presence of 300 μM of the iron chelator 2,2'-dipyridyl was compared to control cultures. The length of the iron limitation period was chosen on the basis of previous results, where expression of tbpA and exbB appeared to reach maximum level 30 min after the addition of an iron chelator [38]. Still, a longer iron starvation period may have revealed more genes to be significantly altered by iron deprivation. For each serotype, the growth experiment was performed in four replicas on different days. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR) was used to verify the microarray results on a sub-set of 18 up- or down-regulated genes, representing a wide range of log2 ratio values (Figure 1). Three previously validated reference genes were used for normalization of the qPCR data [38]. Of the two methods, qPCR displayed the greatest dynamic range. Still, a correlation of 0.93 between microarray and qPCR log2 expression ratios (Spearman's Rho, p < 3.51 × 10-8, df = 16) demonstrated that the results of the two platforms correlated very well with each other. Additionally, cDNA from samples of serotype 2 and 6 grown in iron replete media (2,2'-dipyridyl and ammonium iron(II) sulfate hexahydrate) were included in the qPCR analysis. Comparing the bacterial expression in iron replete versus iron deplete media (only 2,2'-dipyridyl added), nearly all the tested genes were oppositely or much less up- or down-regulated in the iron replete media of both serotypes (Additional file 1 Figure S1). Only one gene, copA, was up-regulated in both iron deplete and replete cells of serotype 6. Based on the results of the qPCR analysis, along with previous observation by other researchers using the same iron chelator [27, 29], we concluded that most of the observed differences in the microarrays were actually due to iron deprivation and not the addition of 2,2'-dipyridyl.

Figure 1

qPCR validation of microarray results. Mean log2 ratios of qPCR results, based on all the included serotypes, are plotted against the mean log2 ratios of the microarray analysis. Included are twelve up-regulated and six down-regulated genes representing a range of log2 ratio values. The numbers on the graph refer to genes listed in Table 4.

Of the 4876 target genes on the microarray, a total of 112 genes were found to be significantly expressed (p < 0.0001; estimated false positive error rate of 0.5%) in all six serotypes under iron depleted conditions. Of these, 45 were up-regulated (Table 1) and 67 were down-regulated (Table 2). When estimating the combined effect of treatment and serotype, 12 genes also displayed significant (p < 0.0001; estimated false positive error rate of 0.5%) serotype related response to iron limitation, three were up-regulated and 9 down-regulated (marked in Table 1 and 2). A quick overview of the general distribution of the significantly regulated genes is provided in the genomic atlases depicting the gene expression of all the included serotypes (Figure 2). When classifying the significantly regulated genes according to the Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COGs,, [39]), there was a striking difference in the distribution of functional groups between the up- and down-regulated genes (Figure 3). Nearly half (47%) the up-regulated genes belonged to the "Inorganic ion transport and metabolism" category while this group of proteins only represented 12% of the down-regulated genes. The down-regulated genes mainly (57%) belonged to the "Energy production and conversion" category, a group which only constituted 4.5% of the up-regulated genes. In general, we observed a pattern of gene expression very similar to previous observations of transcriptional response to iron limitation in Pasteurellaceae: an increased uptake of iron via the mobilization of iron-transport genes and siderophores and a decrease in iron consumption by down-regulation of non-essential iron consuming proteins, mostly genes involved in anaerobic metabolism [2629].

Table 1 Genes up-regulated in A. pleuropneumoniae under iron limitation
Table 2 Genes down-regulated in A. pleuropneumoniae under iron limitation
Figure 2

Genome BLAST atlases of A. pleuropneumoniae expression patterns. A. pleuropneumoniae 3 str. JL03 is the reference genome and is compared to the remaining five serotypes, including controls (K) (rings 1 to 6 from center) and iron depleted cultures (JH) (rings 8 to 13 from center). The p values of the expression differences between control and iron depleted cultures are included (ring 7 from centre). The positions of the ORFs displaying significant up-regulation under iron restriction are marked.

Figure 3

Distribution of significantly regulated genes classified according to the Clusters of Orthologous groups (COGs). Dark blue bars: up-regulated genes, light blue bars: down-regulated genes. J: translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis, K: transcription, L: DNA replication, recombination, and repair, O: posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones, M: cell envelope biogenesis, outer membrane, P: inorganic ion transport and metabolism, T: signal transduction mechanisms, C: energy production and conversion, G: carbohydrate transport and metaholism, E: amino acid transport and metabolism, Q: secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism, U: intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport, R: general function prediction, only, S: function unknown.

Genes up-regulated under growth in iron-depleted media

Not surprisingly, many of the up-regulated genes in this study were related to iron homeostasis (Table 1); at least 60% of these were previously identified in A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 1 under similar conditions by Deslandes et al. [26]. Some genes were homologous to iron-regulators commonly found in the Pasteurellaceae group or in Gram-negative bacteria, and known to be of major importance to iron sequestration of the host. Among these were the tonB1-exbB1-exbD1 complex, universally found in Gram-negative bacteria [25, 40], and the two co-regulated transferrin receptor genes tbpB1 and tbpA1[21, 23]. TonB2, but not exbB2-exbD2, was up-regulated. In accordance with previous observations, the up-regulation of tonB2 was lower than in tonB1 (log2 ratios of 0.41 and 1.46, respectively) [24]. Also highly expressed under iron restriction were OM Hb receptor hgbA and the putative haem utilization gene, hugZ[25, 26]. As in most transcriptional profiling studies of Pasteurellaceae species under iron deprivation, members of the yfe system likewise showed up-regulated transcription [2629].

Putative hemoglobin and haem uptake genes

As previously observed in A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 1, iron depletion resulted in up-regulation of a putative tonB-dependent haem receptor (APL_1299) [26]. APL_1299 encodes a protein with significant similarity to tdhA/hemR/huxC genes of other Pasteurellaceae species [41]. This gene appears to be important for heme-hemopexin uptake during host adaptation in H. influenzae and P. multocida[42]. APL_1299 is probably of less significance in A. pleuropneumoniae, where the hgbA gene appears to be sufficient for heme/iron acquisition from the mammal host [25]. A more interesting virulence candidate is the tellurite resistance gene, tehB. TehB increased its expression during growth in iron restrictive media in all six serotypes of A. pleuropneumoniae, as well as in P. multocida and in H. influenzae[26, 27]. In H. influenzae, tehB is involved in both resistance to oxidative damage and haem uptake/utilization, and is an important virulence factor in this organism in an animal model of invasive disease [43]. Further studies are needed to determine whether tehB is also of importance to iron-sequestration in A. pleuropneumoniae.

A new potential iron acquisition system identified by Deslandes et al. [26] was also up-regulated under iron limited conditions in this study. The three putative open reading frames (ORFs), APL_1953 to APL_1955, all displayed between 50% to 55% homology with the tonB-dependent haemoglobin-haptoglobin receptor, hpuB, of N. meningitidis[44]. In N. meningitidis, slip-strand mispairing is the cause of phase variation in the expression of hpuAB[44]. In the ORF APL_1953 of A. pleuropneumoniae, we observed serotype related sequence variation in the form of a 71 bp insertion/deletion region, situated just before a 42 bp sequence of high GC content (62% GC in serotype 5 against a normal average of 41%) (Figure 4). Such GC rich sequences can be regions of high recombination [45]. In serotypes 2, 5, and 6, the 71 bp were missing, whereas the sequence was present in serotypes 1, 3, and 7. We PCR amplified and sequenced the part of APL_1953 harboring the variable region in all six serotypes. This confirmed that the observed differences were not due to assembly error in the published genomes. In the short version, APL_1953 codes for a putative protein of 19.7 kDa and in the long version a 26.7 kDa sized protein. Judging from our results, APL_1953 appeared to be expressed in all the included A. pleuropneumoniae serotypes. Such an insertion/deletion event may have an important role in transitions between commensalism and pathogenicity [45]. In this case, both variants of the APL_1953 gene included a high-virulent serotype. Consequently, it is doubtful if this particular region is related to virulence. Still, it would be interesting to examine the possible effect of the insertion/deletion region with regard to protein function.

Figure 4

Variable region of ORF APL_1953 illustrated in serotype 7. Red text: region with high GC concentration (57% in serotype 7). Underscored text: region missing in A. pleuropneumoniae serotypes 2, 5, and 6.

The three hpuB ORFs also displayed serotype-specific transcriptional variations in response to iron levels of the media. Here, the most intriguing observation was the low expression of all three genes in serotype 3, which, is considered one of the least virulent A. pleuropneumoniae serotypes (Figure 5A) [4, 18]. In the qPCR analysis, serotype 3 was the only serotype in which none of the three ORFs were significantly up-regulated during iron deprivation (Figure 5B). For the remaining serotypes, we observed no correlation between level of pathogenesis and degree of expression. Serotype 2, for example, was only significantly up-regulated in APL_1954 and in the moderately virulent serotype 6, all three genes were highly up-regulated. As previously mentioned, infection experiments have shown that differences in pathogenic potential also exists within serotypes [17]. Therefore comparisons of strains of the same serotype which have experimentally been determined to be of differential virulence might elucidate the role of these ORFs in A. pleuropneumoniae.

Figure 5

Serotype specific transcriptional up-regulation in response to iron depletion. Individual mean log2 expression ratios for the three hpuB ORFs, APL_1953 to APL_1955 in the six included A. pleuropneumoniae serotypes: (A) obtained with microarray analysis, (B) obtained with qPCR analysis. Hinges represent the 95% confidence intervals. The asterisks indicate statistical significant up-regulation (P < 0.05) as determined by simple statistical randomization test in REST [71].

Srikumar et al. [25] have shown that the function of hgbA as Hb receptor of A. pleuropneumoniae cannot be replaced. Still, considering the above mentioned findings, it is tempting to speculate that the hpuB genes are of some importance to iron regulation and constitute potential virulence factors of A. pleuropneumoniae. Recent observations support these assumptions. Along with a number of iron acquisition-associated genes of documented importance for virulence, e.g. tonB1 and tonB2, the hpuB gene cluster has been shown to be regulated by the global regulator 'fumerate and nitrate reduction regulator' (FNR) homologue, hlyX[46]. Furthermore, a study by Auger et al. [47] indicated some role of APL_1955 during infection. In a cell infection model, the authors found this gene to be up-regulated in A. pleuropneumoniae adhering to porcine lung cells when compared to non-attached (planktonic) bacteria from the same media [47]. Further research is needed to clarify the importance of the hpuB gene cluster.

Situated just next to the hpuB genes, but transcribed in the opposite direction were the ORFs APP_1957 and APP_1956. Both genes are of unknown function. APP_1957 displayed a putative lipoprotein_5 containing domain. APP_1956 was homologous to the carboxylase alpha subunit of N-methylhyantoinase B/acetone. Like Deslandes et al. [26], we observed these genes to be both highly up-regulated in response to iron deprivation in all serotypes. In fact, with log2 ratios of 3.36 and 2.74, respectively, they were the two most highly up-regulated genes of this study (Table 1).

Known and putative siderophores of A. pleuropneumoniae

The high affinity of OM receptors for their corresponding siderophore complexes, allow bacteria to more efficiently scavenge ferri-siderophores from their surroundings [19]. A. pleuropneumoniae is able to use exogenous hydroxamate and catecholate siderophores for promotion of growth [48]. Presently, only one siderophore receptor, the ferric hydroxamate specific, fhuA, has been described for this microorganism [31]. Besides the fhu- system, genome comparisons among virulent and commensal species of Pasteurellaceae indicate the presence of a second siderophore uptake system in A. pleuropneumoniae[41]. This possible ABC-type cobalamin/F3+ siderophore operon consists of a periplasmic component (APL_0714) and an ATPase component (APL_0717) homologous to the siderophore binding protein fecB, and the ATP-binding protein, fecE, of P. multocida, respectively. The two permease components (APL_0715 and APL_0716), constitute the trans-membrane subunits of this putative siderophore transport system [41]. We observed an increased expression of APL_0714 to APL_0716 in response to iron deprivation in a seemingly co-regulated manner (Table 1). Under similar conditions, APL_0714 and APL_0717 were up-regulated in serotype 1 [26]. The increased expression during iron deprivation and the close homology of APL_0714 to APL_0717 with siderophore family transporters of other Pasteurellaceae support the hypothesis of a second siderophore acquisition system in A. pleuropneumoniae.

We also identified a third putative A. pleuropneumoniae siderophore receptor, ORF APL_0565, which was transcriptionally active under iron limited growth conditions in all six serotypes. This hypothetical tonB-dependent, ABC transporter ATP-binding protein displays 83%, homology with the cirA genes of Actinobacillus minor and shares 49% identity with the putative OM ferric siderophore of N. meningtidis. The estimated molecular weight of the A. pleuropneumoniae cirA protein, 72.6 kDa, is close to the 74 kDa size of the orthologous protein in Escherichia coli. In E. coli, the cirA gene was one out of six OM proteins identified as Fe3+ siderophore receptors regulated by fur and iron concentrations [4951]. One of the most effective ferric iron chelating compounds known is enterobactin, the chatecholate type siderophore of E. coli and several other bacteria [52]. As previously mentioned, A. pleuropneumoniae is able to use catecholate siderophores for promotion of growth [48]. Possibly the fec-like operon and the hypothetical cirA protein encode the siderophore receptors responsible for uptake of this iron-chelator in A. pleuropneumoniae. Contrary to the fhu-system, whose regulation is iron-independent [32], the putative catecholate receptors appear to be iron-repressible.

Other iron uptake systems

The iron and fur repressed operons ycdNOB of E. coli and ywbLMN of Bacillus subtillis are predicted elemental iron uptake systems orthologous to the copper oxidase-dependent Fe(III) uptake system, Ftrp/Fet3p, of Saccharomyces cerevisiae[53]. In B. subtillis, ywbLMN appears to be involved in the uptake of free ferric iron [54]. An ycdNOB-ywbLMN-like fur repressed iron-transport system may also be present in A. pleuropneumoniae, represented by the ORFs APL_0670, APL_0669, and APL_0668. All three ORFs were up-regulated in A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 1 under iron limitation [26]. We found only the last two ORFs to be up-regulated in all the included serotypes under similar growth conditions. APL_0669 encoded a putative peroxidase YwbN precursor. APL_0668, a putative periplasmic lipoprotein involved in iron transport, is 58% identical to the ycdO of Gemella haemolysans. By analogy of the well-characterized Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ftrp/Fet3p system, it has been suggested that ywbLMN functions as a Fe(III) permease [54]. In B. subtilis, the ywbLMN iron uptake system was required for growth in iron-limited medium lacking citrate, and in E. coli the ycdNOB proteins function as an additional ferrous iron-uptake systems [54, 55]. The functional role of the putative operon, ywbLMN, of A. pleuropneumoniae is presently unknown.

Other up-regulated genes

Also up-regulated in the iron depleted bacteria was a potential co-regulated operon consisting of the copper-transporting P-type ATPase, copA gene (APL_1265), a putative cation transport ATPase (APL_1264), and a predicted metal-binding protein (APL_1263). In eukaryotes, several interdependent connections between copper and iron homeostasis have been described. Knowledge of such processes in bacterial systems is still limited [56]. In E. coli, 2,2'-dipyridyl supposedly only effects iron and not the copper and magnesium levels of the bacterial cell [57]. Still, we have reason to believe that the up-regulation of at least the copA in serotype 6 may be an artifact introduced by this high affinity chelator. Primarily because the qPCR analysis, testing the possible effect of 2,2'-dipyridyl, indicated that this regulatory event was un-related to iron deficiency. Secondly, in a similar study, the copA gene of Staphylococcus aureus was expressed in the media but not in vivo[58]. Finally, none of the above mentioned three genes were up-regulated in A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 1 when EDDHA was used to obtain iron restricted conditions [26].

We also saw an up-regulation of the Fe/S biogenesis protein, nfuA. In E. coli, nfuA is required for maturing Fe/S proteins under oxidative stress and iron starvation [59]. Overall, observations from studies involving E. coli and other bacteria seem to point towards a general role for the ubiquitous bacterial protein nfuA in Fe/S protein folding under stress conditions [59].

Some of the up-regulated genes of the microarray were not directly related to iron-homeostasis, but were situated next to known or putative iron regulators and displayed similar expression ratios. The position and the seeming co-regulation of these ORFs indicate some indirect involvement in iron homeostasis. For example, three loci immediately downstream of the tbpA1 gene, APL_1566 to APL_1564, were all transcribed in the same direction and up-regulated to a similar extend as the tbpBA genes (Table 1). The xylB1 gene (APL_1564), encoding pentolose and hexulose kinase, was also up-regulated in A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 1 and M. haemolytica under iron-deprivation [26, 29].

The fumerate and nitrate reduction regulator (FNR) homologue, hlyX has a global regulatory role in A. pleuropneumoniae where it induces the expression of genes involved in anaerobic metabolism and simultaneously represses genes involved in aerobic metabolism [46]. Also the expression of the iron acquisition-associated genes, frpB, the tonB1 and tonB2, and the newly described putative hpuB cluster were found to be positively regulated by hlyX under anaerobic conditions [46]. In this and previous studies of Pasteurellaceae[26, 27], the gene regulations under iron restricted condition were not completely in accordance with the expected FNR regulation. In A. pleuropneumoniae and P. multocida, the hlyX gene was up-regulated while genes that are normally transcriptionally activated by hlyX were down-regulated (see below). HlyX is important but not essential to virulence and other not-yet-identified regulators may be involved in gene regulation under anaerobic conditions [60].

Genes down-regulated under iron restriction

In agreement with observations in A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 1, P. multocida, and M. haemolytica[26, 27, 29], more than half of the 67 down-regulated genes under iron shortage belonged to the COG group "energy production and conversion". The repressed genes were the main cellular iron consumers, mostly genes coding for metabolic enzymes dependent on Fe-S clusters or other iron cofactors e.g. hydroxylamine reductase, cytochrome c peroxidase, and the fumerate reductase operon (Table 2). As for deducting any hypothesis regarding difference in virulence among serotypes, the genes which displayed significant serotype related down-regulation in response to iron limitation were not very useful (genes marked with a number sign in Table 2). For all the 9 genes, a low virulent (serotype 3) and a high virulent (serotype 5) serotype seemed to be the least repressed.

Many down-regulated genes coded for proteins involved in anaerobic metabolism, some of which are known to be regulated by one or both of the two important anaerobic regulators, hlyX and anoxic redox control protein A (arcA) [46, 61]. Genes/operons down-regulated in this study and expected to be controlled by hlyX were: 1) terminal reductases, transferring respiratory chain electrons to alternative electrons acceptors: dimethyl sulfoxide reductase (dmsBA), periplasmic nitrate reductase (napFDAGHBC), and the TMAO reductase (torYZ), 2) genes encoding enzymes involved in the oxidation of high-energy substrates e.g. the Ni/Fe cofactor dependent hydrogenases (hyaAB and hybAB).

Although we observed no up-regulation of arcA, a number of genes know to be controlled by arcA were also differentially expressed in this study [61]. Genes negatively regulated by arcA and likewise down-regulated in this study were: the OM protein precursor (ompW), the formate dehydrogenase genes (fdnI and fdxHG), the putative dehydrogenase subunit (ykgE), the putative Fe-S electron transport protein (ykgF), and the nitrate reductase operon (nrfDBA). As with the hlyX regulator, the expression pattern of some genes did not concur with the expected pattern of arcA regulation [61]. For example, the genes encoding L-lactate dehydrogenase (lldD) and a putative oxygen-independent coproporphyrinogen III oxidase (chuW), both expected to be depressed by arcA, were up-regulated under iron-deprivation in A. pleuropneumoniae. Likewise, a number of genes, the anaerobic dimethyl sulfoxide chain precursors (dmsAB), the serine dehydratase/transporter protein genes (sdaAC), and a putative effector of murein hydrolase (lrfA) under positive regulation of arcA, were all down-regulated in this experiment.

Clearly hlyX and arcA were not the main regulators in A. pleuropneumoniae under iron starvation. Besides the discrepancies just described, far from all the down-regulated metabolic genes, e.g. fumarate reductase genes (frdABCD) and the Na+-translocating NADH-ubiquinone oxireductase subunits (nqrFEDCBA) have been proven to be regulated by hlyX and arcA[61]. As previously mentioned, an essential role of ryhB in iron metabolism has been demonstrated in E. coli, Vibrio cholera and a number of other bacteria [62]. The ubiquitous RNA-binding protein, Hfq is a key factor in regulations by sRNAs in bacteria [35]. In E. coli ryhB sRNA acts as an Hfq-dependent regulator of the acquisition and storage of iron [63]. Although not yet proven for A. pleuropneumoniae or other Pasteurellaceae, the recent discovery of Hfq homologues in A. pleuropneumoniae, P. multocida, and H. influenza makes it more likely that sRNAs participate in controlling iron metabolism in members of this family [35]. Furthermore, the overall down-regulatory response to iron limitation, observed in this and previous studies in Pasteurellaceae, fits well with the concerted actions of fur and rhyB described in E. coli[63]. Fur inactivation enables the expression of the sRNA regulator, ryhB, which then limits the usage of iron to crucial proteins by repression of as many non-essential iron-using proteins as possible [20].


By studying the intra-species variation in the transcriptional response of A. pleuropneumoniae to iron limitation, we identified a set of core genes important to the iron adaptive response of this organism. Not surprisingly, these included known virulence factors such as the tonB-system, tbpBA and hgbA, but also a number of newly described potential iron acquisition genes previously identified in A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 1, e.g. the putative hemoglobin-haptoglobin binding proteins and the yfe-system [26]. We confirmed the up-regulation of the latter genes in an additional five serotypes of A. pleuropneumoniae under iron limitation. Not previously observed in A. pleuropneumoniae was the up-regulation of a putative siderophore, cirA. The hpuB cluster proved to be interesting for several reasons. Firstly, all three genes displayed serotype specific expression under iron limitation. Of the six serotypes, serotype 3 was the only variant in which none of the three ORFs were significantly up-regulated under iron deprivation. Serotype 3 is also considered to be one of the least virulent serotypes of A. pleuropneumoniae. Secondly, in ORF APL_1953 a variable region was identified which differentiated serotypes 2, 5 and 6 from serotypes 1, 3 and 7. The gene was expressed in all serotypes. Except for serotype 3, we could not directly correlate the observed variances in the hpuB ORFs with serotype related differences in pathogenesis. Still, it would be interesting to study further the implications of these divergences in gene expression and length and to determine the role the hpuB gene complex concerning iron acquisition and virulence in A. pleuropneumoniae. In all, the combined effect of iron-depletion and serotype proved to be modest, indicating that serotypes of both medium and high virulence at least in vitro are reacting almost identical to iron restriction. This is perhaps not very surprising, considering the functional importance of the core genes involved in iron regulation.

Attesting to the quality of the array were: 1) the concordance of gene regulation within the operons, 2) the agreement of results between this and previous transcriptional studies of Pasteurellaceae under conditions of iron limitation [2629], and 3) the high correlation between the microarray and qPCR expression ratios. Consequently, the results attest the utility of this novel pan-genomic A. pleuropneumoniae microarray. The design of this array is publicly available and will hopefully be applied for multiple purposes of serotype comparisons in the future.


Bacterial strains and growth conditions

The following strains of A. pleuropneumoniae were used in this investigation: Serotype 1 (4074), serotype 2 (4226), serotype 3 (1421), serotype 5b (L20), serotype 6 (7712640), serotype 7 (WF87). For the iron depletion study, an overnight culture was diluted 1:10 in brain heart infusion broth supplemented with 0.03% NAD (Sigma-Aldrich, Copenhagen, Denmark) and incubated until the optical density at 660 nm was 0.6, representing the exponential growth phase. The culture was split into two 10-ml portions. Iron-depleted conditions were established in one of the flasks by addition of 300 μM 2,2'-dipyridyl (Sigma-Aldrich). For serotype 2 and 6, iron repletion experiments were also performed: to a third 2,2'-dipyridyl containing flask, 300 μM ammonium iron(II) sulfate hexahydrate (Sigma-Aldrich) was added. Next, the cultures were grown under shaking at 37°C for 30 min, after which one volume of RNAlater stabilization reagent (Ambion, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom) was added to the cultures. Samples were harvested by centrifugation, immediately resuspended in one volume of PBS and 5 volumes of RNAlater. Samples were stored at 4°C until extraction. For each serotype, four experiments were performed on different days.

RNA isolation and reverse transcription

Total RNA was isolated from 1.5-ml portions of bacterial samples by using an RNeasy mini kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) as described by the manufacturer. Genomic DNA was eliminated by RNase-free DNase I treatment during the isolation procedure. After RNA extraction, the material was further treated by TURBO™ DNase, according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer (Ambion). The RNA concentration and quality were measured by NanoDrop (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA) and Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), respectively. Quality requirements were: A260/A280 ≥ 1.8 and A260/A230 ≥ 1.8 and RIN ≥ 7.5. Samples not meeting this standard were discarded and new extractions performed. Exceptions to this rule were serotype 5, where the RIN numbers consistently remained between 5.5 and 6, and serotype 6, generally displaying RIN numbers just below 7.

Designing the custom array

The arrays used in this project were based on the NimbleGen 12-plex platform, officially released in a news statement on Nov. 19, 2008. The custom probe set for the arrays was build around a set of 7 core genomes representing all publically available A. pleuropneumoniae and Actinobacillus succinogenes genomes in GenBank and RefSeq [PMID: 18073190]. These included A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 1 str. 4074 [GenBank: AACK00000000], serotype 2 str. 4226 [GenBank: ADXN00000000], serotype 3 str. JL03 [GenBank: NC 010278], serotype 5b str. L20 [GenBank: NC 009053], serotype 6 str. Femo [GenBank: ADXO00000000], and serotype 7 str. AP76 [GenBank: NC 010939]. [6466]. In total, 15018 target genes were identified from these data.

Constructing the Target Gene Set

All genes were aligned all-against-all and any two genes sharing more than 90% identity over the full length of the shortest sequence were connected together into gene networks. Representatives from each gene network were selected using the algorithm of Hobohm et al. [67] for maximizing the size of the selected set. This algorithm eliminates redundancy in a network through the removal in order of the most highly connected members. This produced a set of 4876 Actinobacillus target genes. In total, each array consisted of 130.194 active probes excluding NimbleGen control probes. Each gene was covered by an average of 26.7 probes. The design of this array is publicly available at NimbleGen (091013_DTU_Actino_xRNA).

Probe Selection for Target Genes

Probes for the target gene set were selected using the OligoWiz program [68, 69] applying the following weighting of the scores: Cross-Hybridization: 39.0%, Delta Tm: 26.0%, Folding: 13.0%, Position: 13.0%, Low-complexity: 9.1%. The probe length was adjusted between 44 and 52 bp with an average of 48 bp to ensure comparable hybridization strengths. Because OligoWiz was originally designed for use with single genomes in mind, it was necessary to modify the program, specifically the mechanisms screening for cross-hybridisation which needed to be less strict. A new scheme was devised by introducing a log-transformation in the underlying calculations. The net effect is negligible near the upper boundary of the score, but near the lower boundary it increases the discriminatory power of the method.

Preparation of labeled double-stranded DNA

Ten micrograms of total RNA from each sample was reverse transcribed using SuperScript II (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and Random Hexamer Primers (Invitrogen) according to the NimbleGen Arrays User's Guide (Gene Expression Analysis v3.2). The generated cDNA was incubated with 1 μl of 4 mg/ml RNase A solution (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) at 37°C for 10 min, and then phenol-chloroform extracted. Samples were centrifuged in Phase Lock Gel Tubes (5 Prime, Hamburg, Germany) at 12,000 × g for 5 minutes and precipitated with 80% ethanol. Pellets were air dried in a SpeedVac and rehydrated in 20 μl of ultrapure water (Ambion). Finally the samples were measured by NanoDrop to ensure that the cDNA met the following quality requirements: A260/A280 ≥ 1.8 and A260/A230 ≥ 1.8. NimbleGen One-Color DNA Labeling kit (NimbleGen Systems, Madison, WI) was used for Cy3 labeling of cDNA samples according to the NimbleGen Arrays User's Guide. Briefly, 1 μg double-stranded cDNA was incubated for 10 min at 98°C with Cy3-random Nonamers and then quick-chilled in a ice-water bath for 10 min. The addition of 100 mM of deoxynucleoside triphosphates and 100 U of Klenow fragment (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) was followed by incubation at 37°C for 2 h. The reaction was stopped by adding 0.1 volumes of 0.5 M EDTA, and the labeled cDNA was precipitated with isopropanol.

Hybridization and analysis of arrays

A hybridization kit (NimbleGen Systems, Madison, WI) was used for the hybridization step. Cy3-labeled samples were resuspended in the recommended amount of hybridization buffer and denatured at 95°C for 5 min. Slides were placed in HX12 NimbleGen Mixer and 6 μl of sample loaded though the fill port. Hybridization was performed for 20 h at 42°C (NimbleGen Hybridization System 16). The arrays were washed using a wash buffer kit (NimbleGen Systems), dried in a microarray dryer (NimbleGen), and scanned at a 5 μm resolution using the NimbleGens MS 200 scanner (NimbleGen Systems).

Quantitative real-time PCR

Gene quantification was performed with a Rotor-Gene 6000 (Corbett Research, Sydney, Australia). The primers were designed using Primer3 (v. 0.4.0) [70]. The sequences of the primers are listed in Table 3. Each PCR was performed in a 25 μl reaction mixture containing 12.5 μl QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR master mix (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), a primer concentration of 0.3 μM and 7 ng of cDNA. Three biological replicas were included for each sample. The thermal cycling conditions were as follows: 15 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 15 s at 94°C, 20 s at 55°C, and 20 s at 72°C. Data collection was performed during each extension phase. Positive controls (DNA), a negative control (distilled water), and RT-negative controls (total RNA sample) were included in each run. Melting curve analysis was performed, which for all primer sets resulted in single product-specific melting curves.

Table 3 List of primers used for quantitative real-time PCR and sequencing

Relative quantification

The Excel-based relative expression software tool, REST 2009 (V2.0.13), was applied for group wise comparison and statistical analysis of the qPCR data[71]. The relative expression ratios were calculated by a mathematical model, which included an efficiency correction for real-time PCR efficiency of the individual transcripts [72], as follows:

Ratio = ( E target ) Δ CP target ( c o n t r o l s a m p l e ) / ( E ref ) Δ CP ref ( c o n t r o l s a m p l e )

The relative expression ratio of a target gene was computed based on its real-time PCR efficiencies (E) and the crossing point difference (ΔCP) for an unknown sample versus a control. For each gene, cDNA dilution curves were generated and used to calculate the individual real-time PCR efficiencies (E = 10[-1/slope]). The geometric mean of the three internal reference genes was used to correct the raw values for the genes of interest (Table 4).

Table 4 Relative expression results from REST analysis of qPCR data

Data analysis of Microarray data

The data discussed in this publication have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus [73] and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE24470 Data analysis of the microarrays was performed in "RGui" version 2.9.2 (2009-08-24), using the package "Oligo". The Robust Multichip Average function was applied for normalization of the microarray data [74]. By this method, the expression measure is given in log2 base. Mean log2 expression values of the four biological replicates are given in Table 1 and 2. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test the effect of treatment (F1: bacterial response to iron deficiency versus control) and serotype (F2 response between serotypes 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7) and the combined effect of treatment and serotype (F1:F2).

Construction of genomic atlases

The program BLASTatlas, was used for mapping and visualizing whole genome homology of expressed genes [75]. Using the published genome of A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 3 str. JL03 as a reference strain, the expression values of control cultures and iron depleted cultures of the six serotypes were compared to each other.



outer membrane




small non-coding RNA

Fur :

ferric-uptake regulator protein


Clusters of Orthologous Groups


Real-time quantitative RT-PCR


Fumerate and Nitrate reduction Regulator

ArcA :

Anoxic redox control protein A


  1. 1.

    Pohl S, Bertschinger HU, Frederiksen W, Mannheim W: Transfer of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae and the Pasteurella haemolytica-Like Organism Causing Porcine Necrotic Pleuropneumonia to the Genus Actinobacillus (Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae comb. nov.) on the Basis of Phenotypic and Deoxyribonucleic Acid Relatedness. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1983, 33: 510-514. 10.1099/00207713-33-3-510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bossé JT, Janson H, Sheehan BJ, Beddek AJ, Rycroft AN, Simon K, Langford PR: Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae: pathobiology and pathogenesis of infection. Microbes Infect. 2002, 4: 225-235.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Perry MB, Altman E, Brisson JR, Beynon LM, Richards JC: Structural characteristics of the antigenic capsular polysaccharides and lipopolysaccharides involved in the serological classification of Actinobacillus (Haemophilus) pleuropneumoniae strains. Serodiag Immun Inf D. 1990, 4: 299-308. 10.1016/0888-0786(90)90018-J.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Rosendal S, Boyd DA, Gilbride KA: Comparative virulence of porcine Haemophilus bacteria. Can J Comp Med. 1985, 49: 68-74.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Jacobsen MJ, Nielsen JP, Nielsen R: Comparison of virulence of different Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serotypes and biotypes using an aerosol infection model. Vet Microbiol. 1996, 49: 159-168. 10.1016/0378-1135(95)00184-0.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Komal JPS, Mittal KR: Grouping of Actinobacillus Pleuropneumoniae Strains of Serotype-1 Through Serotype-12 on the Basis of Their Virulence in Mice. Vet Microbiol. 1990, 25: 229-240. 10.1016/0378-1135(90)90080-F.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Rogers RJ, Eaves LE, Blackall PJ, Truman KF: The comparative pathogenicity of four serovars of Actinobacillus (Haemophilus) pleuropneumoniae. Aust Vet J. 1990, 67: 9-12. 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1990.tb07382.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ramjeet M, Deslandes V, Gouré J, Jacques M: Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae vaccines: from bacterins to new insights into vaccination strategies. Anim Health Res Rev. 2008, 9: 25-45. 10.1017/S1466252307001338.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Haesebrouck F, Chiers K, Van O, Ducatelle R: Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae infections in pigs: the role of virulence factors in pathogenesis and protection. Vet Microbiol. 1997, 58: 239-249. 10.1016/S0378-1135(97)00162-4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Fuller TE, Martin S, Teel JF, Alaniz GR, Kennedy MJ, Lowery DE: Identification of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae virulence genes using signature-tagged mutagenesis in a swine infection model. Microb Pathog. 2000, 29: 39-51. 10.1006/mpat.2000.0364.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Baltes N, Hennig-Pauka I, Gerlach GF: Both transferrin binding proteins are virulence factors in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae serotype 7 infection. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002, 209: 283-287. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11145.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Frey J: Virulence in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and RTX toxins. Trends Microbiol. 1995, 3: 257-261. 10.1016/S0966-842X(00)88939-8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Jacques M: Surface polysaccharides and iron-uptake systems of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Can J Vet Res. 2004, 68: 81-85.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Frey J: Detection, identification, and subtyping of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Methods Mol Biol. 2003, 216: 87-95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bertram TA: Quantitative morphology of peracute pulmonary lesions in swine induced by Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae. Vet Pathol. 1985, 22: 598-609. 10.1177/030098588502200615.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Jensen AE, Bertram TA: Morphological and biochemical comparison of virulent and avirulent isolates of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae serotype 5. Infect Immun. 1986, 51: 419-424.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Brandreth SR, Smith IM: Comparative virulence of some English strains of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae serotypes 2 and 3 in the pig. Res Vet Sci. 1987, 42: 187-193.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Mittal KR, Higgins R, Larivière S, Leblanc D: A 2-mercaptoethanol tube agglutination test for diagnosis of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae infection in pigs. Am J Vet Res. 1984, 45: 715-719.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Andrews SC, Robinson AK, Rodríguez-Quiñones F: Bacterial iron homeostasis. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2003, 27: 215-237. 10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00055-X.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Massé E, Arguin M: Ironing out the problem: new mechanisms of iron homeostasis. Trends Biochem Sci. 2005, 30: 462-468.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Gerlach GF, Klashinsky S, Anderson C, Potter AA, Willson PJ: Characterization of two genes encoding distinct transferrin-binding proteins in different Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae isolates. Infect Immun. 1992, 60: 3253-3261.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Gonzalez GC, Yu RH, Rosteck PR, Schryvers AB: Sequence, genetic analysis, and expression of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae transferrin receptor genes. Microbiology. 1995, 141 (Pt 10): 2405-2416. 10.1099/13500872-141-10-2405.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Tonpitak W, Thiede S, Oswald W, Baltes N, Gerlach GF: Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae iron transport: a set of exbBD genes is transcriptionally linked to the tbpB gene and required for utilization of transferrin-bound iron. Infect Immun. 2000, 68: 1164-1170. 10.1128/IAI.68.3.1164-1170.2000.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Beddek AJ, Sheehan BJ, Bossé JT, Rycroft AN, Kroll JS, Langford PR: Two TonB Systems in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae: Their Roles in Iron Acquisition and Virulence. Infect Immun. 2004, 72: 701-708. 10.1128/IAI.72.2.701-708.2004.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Srikumar R, Mikael LG, Pawelek PD, Khamessan A, Gibbs BF, Jacques M, Coulton JW: Molecular cloning of haemoglobin-binding protein HgbA in the outer membrane of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Microbiology. 2004, 150: 1723-1734. 10.1099/mic.0.27046-0.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Deslandes V, Nash JH, Harel J, Coulton JW, Jacques M: Transcriptional profiling of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae under iron-restricted conditions. BMC Genomics. 2007, 8: 72-10.1186/1471-2164-8-72.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Paustian ML, May BJ, Kapur V: Pasteurella multocida gene expression in response to iron limitation. Infect Immun. 2001, 69: 4109-4115. 10.1128/IAI.69.6.4109-4115.2001.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Whitby PW, Vanwagoner TM, Seale TW, Morton DJ, Stull TL: Transcriptional profile of Haemophilus influenzae: effects of iron and heme. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188: 5640-5645. 10.1128/JB.00417-06.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Roehrig SC, Tran HQ, Spehr V, Gunkel N, Selzer PM, Ullrich HJ: The response of Mannheimia haemolytica to iron limitation: implications for the acquisition of iron in the bovine lung. Vet Microbiol. 2007, 121: 316-329. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.12.013.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Chin N, Frey J, Chang CF, Chang YF: Identification of a locus involved in the utilization of iron by Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1996, 143: 1-6. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1996.tb08452.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Mikael LG, Pawelek PD, Labrie J, Sirois M, Coulton JW, Jacques M: Molecular cloning and characterization of the ferric hydroxamate uptake (fhu) operon in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Microbiol. 2002, 148: 2869-2882.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Mikael LG, Srikumar R, Coulton JW, Jacques M: fhuA of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae encodes a ferrichrome receptor but is not regulated by iron. Infect Immun. 2003, 71: 2911-2915. 10.1128/IAI.71.5.2911-2915.2003.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Hsu YM, Chin N, Chang CF, Chang YF: Cloning and characterization of the Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae fur gene and its role in regulation of ApxI and AfuABC expression. DNA Seq. 2003, 14: 169-181.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Jacobsen I, Gerstenberger J, Gruber AD, Bossé JT, Langford PR, Hennig-Pauka I, Meens J, Gerlach GF: Deletion of the ferric uptake regulator Fur impairs the in vitro growth and virulence of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Infect Immun. 2005, 73: 3740-3744. 10.1128/IAI.73.6.3740-3744.2005.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Chao Y, Vogel J: The role of Hfq in bacterial pathogens. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2010, 13: 24-33. 10.1016/j.mib.2010.01.001.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Melnikow E, Dornan S, Sargent C, Duszenko M, Evans G, Gunkel N, Selzer PM, Ullrich HJ: Microarray analysis of Haemophilus parasuis gene expression under in vitro growth conditions mimicking the in vivo environment. Vet Microbiol. 2005, 110: 255-263. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.08.007.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Whitby PW, Seale TW, VanWagoner TM, Morton DJ, Stull TL: The iron/heme regulated genes of Haemophilus influenzae: comparative transcriptional profiling as a tool to define the species core modulon. BMC Genomics. 2009, 10: 6-10.1186/1471-2164-10-6.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Nielsen KK, Boye M: Real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis of expression stability of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae housekeeping genes during in vitro growth under iron-depleted conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005, 71: 2949-2954. 10.1128/AEM.71.6.2949-2954.2005.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Tatusov RL, Koonin EV, Lipman DJ: A genomic perspective on protein families. Science. 1997, 278: 631-637. 10.1126/science.278.5338.631.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Postle K: TonB and the gram-negative dilemma. Mol Microbiol. 1990, 4: 2019-2025. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1990.tb00561.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Challacombe JF, Inzana TJ: Comparative Genomics of Pasteurellaceae. Pasteurellaceae: Biology, Genomics and Molecular Aspects. Edited by: Kuhnert P, Christensen H. 2008, Nordfolk, UK. Caister Academic Press, 53-77.

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Boyce JD, Wilkie I, Harper M, Paustian ML, Kapur V, Adler B: Genomic-scale analysis of Pasteurella multocida gene expression during growth within liver tissue of chickens with fowl cholera. Microbes Infect. 2004, 6: 290-298. 10.1016/j.micinf.2003.12.004.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Whitby PW, Seale TW, Morton DJ, VanWagoner TM, Stull TL: Characterization of the Haemophilus influenzae tehB gene and its role in virulence. Microbiology. 2010, 156: 1188-1200. 10.1099/mic.0.036400-0.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Lewis LA, Gipson M, Hartman K, Ownbey T, Vaughn J, Dyer DW: Phase variation of HpuAB and HmbR, two distinct haemoglobin receptors of Neisseria meningitidis DNM2. Mol Microbiol. 1999, 32: 977-989. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01409.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Touchon M, Hoede C, Tenaillon O, Barbe V, Baeriswyl S, Bidet P, Bingen E, Bonacorsi S, Bouchier C, Bouvet O, Calteau A, Chiapello H, Clermont O, Cruveiller S, Danchin A, Diard M, Dossat C, El Karoui M, Frapy E, Garry L, Ghigo JM, Gilles AM, Johnson J, Le Bouguénec C, Lescat M, Mangenot S, Martinez-Jéhanne V, Matic I, Nassif X, Oztas S, Petit MA, Pichon C, Rouy Z, Sain Ruf C, Schneider D, Tourret J, Vacherie B, Vallenet D, Médigue C, Rocha EPC, Denamur E: Organised genome dynamics in the Escherichia coli species results in highly diverse adaptive paths. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5: e1000344-10.1371/journal.pgen.1000344.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Buettner FF, Bendalla IM, Bossé JT, Meens J, Nash JH, Härtig E, Langford PR, Gerlach GF: Analysis of the Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae HlyX (FNR) regulon and identification of iron-regulated protein B as an essential virulence factor. Proteomics. 2009, 9: 2383-2398. 10.1002/pmic.200800439.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Auger E, Deslandes V, Ramjeet M, Contreras I, Nash JHE, Harel J, Gottschalk M, Olivier M, Jacques M: Host-Pathogen Interactions of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae with Porcine Lung and Tracheal Epithelial Cells. Infect Immun. 2009, 77: 1426-1441. 10.1128/IAI.00297-08.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Diarra MS, Dolence JA, Dolence EK, Darwish I, Miller MJ, Malouin F, Jacques M: Growth of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae is promoted by exogenous hydroxamate and catechol siderophores. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996, 62: 853-859.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Curtis NA, Eisenstadt RL, East SJ, Cornford RJ, Walker LA, White AJ: Iron-regulated outer membrane proteins of Escherichia coli K-12 and mechanism of action of catechol-substituted cephalosporins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988, 32: 1879-1886.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Nikaido H, Rosenberg EY: Cir and Fiu proteins in the outer membrane of Escherichia coli catalyze transport of monomeric catechols: study with beta-lactam antibiotics containing catechol and analogous groups. J Bacteriol. 1990, 172: 1361-1367.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    McHugh JP, Rodriguez-Quiñones F, Abdul-Tehrani H, Svistunenko DA, Poole RK, Cooper CE, Andrews SC: Global iron-dependent gene regulation in Escherichia coli. A new mechanism for iron homeostasis. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 29478-29486. 10.1074/jbc.M303381200.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Grass G: Iron transport in Escherichia coli: all has not been said and done. Biometals. 2006, 19: 159-172. 10.1007/s10534-005-4341-2.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Cartron ML, Mitchell SA, Woodhall MR, Andrews SC, Watson KA: Preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of YcdB from Escherichia coli: a novel haem-containing and Tat-secreted periplasmic protein with a potential role in iron transport. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun. 2007, 63: 37-41. 10.1107/S174430910604509X.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Ollinger J, Song KB, Antelmann H, Hecker M, Helmann JD: Role of the Fur regulon in iron transport in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188: 3664-3673. 10.1128/JB.188.10.3664-3673.2006.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Grosse C, Scherer J, Koch D, Otto M, Taudte N, Grass G: A new ferrous iron-uptake transporter, EfeU (YcdN), from Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2006, 62: 120-131. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05326.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Chillappagari S, Seubert A, Trip H, Kuipers OP, Marahiel MA, Miethke M: Copper Stress Affects Iron Homeostasis by Destabilizing Iron-Sulfur Cluster Formation in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2010, 192: 2512-2524. 10.1128/JB.00058-10.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Lin XM, Wu LN, Li H, Wang SY, Peng XX: Downregulation of Tsx and OmpW and upregulation of OmpX are required for iron homeostasis in Escherichia coli. J Proteome Res. 2008, 7: 1235-1243. 10.1021/pr7005928.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Allard M, Moisan H, Brouillette E, Gervais AL, Jacques M, Lacasse P, Diarra MS, Malouin F: Transcriptional modulation of some Staphylococcus aureus iron-regulated genes during growth in vitro and in a tissue cage model in vivo. Microbes Infect. 2006, 8: 1679-1690. 10.1016/j.micinf.2006.01.022.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Angelini S, Gerez C, Ollagnier- de Choudens S, Sanakis Y, Fontecave M, Barras F, Py B: NfuA, a new factor required for maturing Fe/S proteins in Escherichia coli under oxidative stress and iron starvation conditions. J Biol Chem. 2008, 283: 14084-14091. 10.1074/jbc.M709405200.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Baltes N, N'diaye M, Jacobsen ID, Maas A, Buettner FF, Gerlach GF: Deletion of the anaerobic regulator HlyX causes reduced colonization and persistence of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae in the porcine respiratory tract. Infect Immun. 2005, 73: 4614-4619. 10.1128/IAI.73.8.4614-4619.2005.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Buettner FF, Bendallah IM, Bosse JT, Dreckmann K, Nash JH, Langford PR, Gerlach GF: Analysis of the Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae ArcA regulon identifies fumarate reductase as a determinant of virulence. Infect Immun. 2008, 76: 2284-2295. 10.1128/IAI.01540-07.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Massé E, Majdalani N, Gottesman S: Regulatory roles for small RNAs in bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2003, 6: 120-124.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Massé E, Gottesman S: A small RNA regulates the expression of genes involved in iron metabolism in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 4620-4625.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Foote SJ, Bossé JT, Bouevitch AB, Langford PR, Young NM, Nash JHE: The Complete Genome Sequence of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae L20 (Serotype 5b). J Bacteriol. 2008, 190: 1495-1496. 10.1128/JB.01845-07.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Xu Z, Zhou Y, Li L, Zhou R, Xiao S, Wan Y, Zhang S, Wang K, Li W, Li L, Jin H, Kang M, Dalai B, Li T, Liu L, Cheng Y, Zhang L, Xu T, Zheng H, Pu S, Wang B, Gu W, Zhang XL, Zhu GF, Wang S, Zhao GP, Chen H: Genome Biology of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae JL03, an Isolate of Serotype 3 Prevalent in China. PLoS ONE. 2008, 3: e1450-10.1371/journal.pone.0001450.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Zhan B, Angen O, Hedegaard J, Bendixen C, Panitz F: The Draft Genome Sequences of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae Serotypes 2 and 6. J Bacteriol. 2010, 192: 5846-5847. 10.1128/JB.00867-10.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Hobohm U, Scharf M, Schneider R, Sander C: Selection of representative protein data sets. Protein Sci. 1992, 1: 409-417. 10.1002/pro.5560010313.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Wernersson R, Nielsen HB: OligoWiz 2.0integrating sequence feature annotation into the design of microarray probes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33: W611-W615. 10.1093/nar/gki399.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Wernersson R, Juncker AS, Nielsen HB: Probe selection for DNA microarrays using OligoWiz. Nat Protoc. 2007, 2: 2677-2691. 10.1038/nprot.2007.370.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Rozen S, Skaletsky H: Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol Biol. 2000, 132: 365-386.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Pfaffl MW, Horgan GW, Dempfle L: Relative expression software tool (REST) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR. Nucl Acids Res. 2002, 30: e36-10.1093/nar/30.9.e36.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Pfaffl MW: A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucl Acids Res. 2001, 29: e45-10.1093/nar/29.9.e45.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Edgar R, Domrachev M, Lash AE: Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucl Acids Res. 2002, 30: 207-210. 10.1093/nar/30.1.207.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Irizarry RA, Hobbs B, Collin F, Beazer-Barclay YD, Antonellis KJ, Scherf U, Speed TP: Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics. 2003, 4: 249-264. 10.1093/biostatistics/4.2.249.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Hallin PF, Binnewies TT, Ussery DW: The genome BLASTatlas-a GeneWiz extension for visualization of whole-genome homology. Mol Biosyst. 2008, 4: 363-371. 10.1039/b717118h.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the Danish Research Council for Technology and Production Sciences (274-07-0127). The authors thank Anastasia Isbrand, Joanna Amenuvor and Lene Holberg Blicher for technical assistance. The authors thank Bujie Zhan, Jakob Hedegaard, Frank Panitz and Christian Bendixen for providing the draft sequences of A. pleuropneumoniae serotypes 2 and 6.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kirstine Klitgaard.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

All authors participated in conceiving and designing the study. KK performed growth studies, microarray and qPCR analysis and drafted the manuscript. CF designed the pan-genomic microarray and helped with the downstream data analysis and manuscript. MB, CF and ØA revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Figure S1. The effect of 2,2'-dipyridyl with and without the addition of exogenous iron

Additional file 1:. Results of qPCR expression analysis of A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 2 (A) and serotype 6 (B) grown in media with 300 μM of 2,2'- dipyridyl only (dark blue bars) or with 300 μM of 2,2'- dipyridyl and 300 μM of ammonium iron(II) sulphate hexahydrate (light blue bars). (PDF 124 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klitgaard, K., Friis, C., Angen, Ø. et al. Comparative profiling of the transcriptional response to iron restriction in six serotypes of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae with different virulence potential. BMC Genomics 11, 698 (2010).

Download citation


  • Dipyridyl
  • Iron Limitation
  • Iron Deprivation
  • Iron Uptake System
  • False Positive Error Rate