Skip to main content

Computational and experimental analysis identifies Arabidopsis genes specifically expressed during early seed development



Plant seeds are complex organs in which maternal tissues, embryo and endosperm, follow distinct but coordinated developmental programs. Some morphogenetic and metabolic processes are exclusively associated with seed development. The goal of this study was to explore the feasibility of incorporating the available online bioinformatics databases to discover Arabidopsis genes specifically expressed in certain organs, in our case immature seeds.


A total of 11,032 EST sequences obtained from isolated immature seeds were used as the initial dataset (178 of them newly described here). A pilot study was performed using EST virtual subtraction followed by microarray data analysis, using the Genevestigator tool. These techniques led to the identification of 49 immature seed-specific genes. The findings were validated by RT-PCR analysis and in situ hybridization.


We conclude that the combined in silico data analysis is an effective data mining strategy for the identification of tissue-specific gene expression.


Seeds are complex genetic entities with a diploid maternal genotype, derived from the ovary wall, a diploid embryo, with equal genetic contributions from the pollen donor and pollen recipient, and a triploid endosperm, in which the maternal genetic contribution is twice that of the paternal parent. Endosperm development is a process with many unique features determining the coordinated development and disappearance of a highly specialized organ [1]. During embryogenesis, the egg cell divides and develops into an embryo, passing through different developmental phases: globular, heart, torpedo, cotyledon, curled-cotyledon and maturation [2]. Key steps in early embryo development are the acquisition of a polar structure with a shoot-root axis, the formation of the apical and root meristems, and the differentiation of the cotyledon primordia. After this last stage, the size of the embryo increases and deposition of storage macromolecules begins. Finally, during maturation, the embryo desiccates. During this process, the seed coat develops from the two integuments that surround the embryo. Several of the processes described above are not present in any other plant tissues, so the genetic program for seed development is likely to involve the concerted activity of many seed-specific genes.

Determination of the genes involved in seed development, and their functions, is one of the major goals in plant developmental biology. Mutational approaches have been extensively used to analyse seed development in Arabidopsis [35]. Several mutants have been isolated giving loss-of- or altered-seed development allowing the identification of several genes [6, 7]. However, insertional mutagenesis has some deficiencies. For example, probably due to gene redundancy, many of the insertions in genes do not produce any detectable phenotype, and genes whose disruption produces alterations in seed development are not necessarily genes with seed specific expression [6]. In consequence, although mutational approaches have been, and still are, basic for understanding the processes involved in seed development, they are not enough to build a complete picture of the process.

Expression profiling and definition of genes specifically or preferentially expressed in certain tissues complement the genetic and molecular approaches. The generation of EST collections and the oligonucleotide-based microarrays can produce reliable, high-quality data [8, 9]. The deposition of the results of RNA profiling experiments in public databases provides a valuable tool for in silico analysis of organ specific gene expression. There have been several reports of EST-based computer analysis of human tissue transcriptomes [1015], and computer analyses have been performed in differential human EST database searches [16].

EST abundance in plants is not as high as for humans, but for some species the total number of ESTs in publicly available databases exceeds the total number of genes by more than one order of magnitude. For example, the NCBI dbEST database release 111105 (November 11, 2005) [17] included 656,945 from Zea mays (maize), 600,039 sequences from Triticum aestivum (wheat), 420,789 from Arabidopsis thaliana (thale cress) and 406,790 from Oryza sativa (rice), compared with the 7,057,754 for humans. Despite this, there are few examples of in silico expression studies in plants [18, 19].

From the complete sequencing of certain plant genomes, it is possible to monitor gene expression on a genome-scale using high-density oligonucleotide arrays [20]. Thousands of Arabidopsis arrays, containing probes for more than twenty thousand genes, have been processed, and systematic analyses of gene expression in different organs, developmental conditions and stress responses, have been performed [9, 2123]. The results of many of these are publicly available through web browser interfaces such as the Genevestigator tool [2426]. In view of this, at least for Arabidopsis, data analysis rather than data collection is the first challenge for biologists in determining patterns of gene expression.

The focus of this work was the identification of genes whose expression is specific in immature seeds. Firstly, we sequenced cDNA clones from isolated immature seeds. Secondly, we used in silico subtraction in a combination of EST selection and microarray data analysis in order to select genes with the desired pattern of expression. Finally, 49 genes specifically expressed during seed development were selected. Our study demonstrates the reliability of in silico subtraction methods in Arabidopsis and provides a basis for targeted reverse-genetic approaches aimed at identifying key genes involved in reproductive development in plants.

Results and discussion

Sequencing Arabidopsis young seed ESTs

ESTs from isolated Arabidopsis immature seeds are not very abundant in EST databases (Figure 1). Among the 420,789 Arabidopsis ESTs deposited (release 111105) [17], 10,854 correspond to isolated immature seeds, 10,800 correspond to seeds in mid-development stages [27] and only 54 were obtained from early stages of seed development. We constructed a cDNA library from developing Arabidopsis seeds isolated at a stage from mid-globular to curled-cotyledon (2 to 6 days after pollination) and obtained 178 single pass 5' end sequences (>140 bp). The average sequence length was 579 bp. Newly sequenced ESTs were assembled in contigs and gene identities were assigned querying against the Arabidopsis genome database at TAIR [28] using the BLAST algorithm. They corresponded to 95 individual genes: 93 nuclear and two from chloroplasts. Functional categories were determined based on GO data in the TAIR database [28]. 21% of the genes are linked to translation, 6% to carbohydrate metabolism and 5% to development. The function of 31% of the genes remained unknown. For two of the genes (At1g60987 and At2g02490) no ESTs have been previously sequenced.

Figure 1

Overview of EST libraries from isolated immature Arabidopsis seeds. At the top, a representation of the available EST collections extracted from immature seeds. Lines in colour represent the period of development covered by the library. The library code according to the TIGR Arabidopsis Gene Index ( [29]) is indicated next to the line. The number of ESTs available from the corresponding library is indicated above the line. Green lines correspond to previously existing EST collections, and the blue line corresponds to the new library described here. At the bottom, the stages of embryo and seed development, related to days after flowering (DAF), is shown [49]. The main processes associated with seed development are indicated.

Identification of genes specifically expressed in seeds during early development

A two step in silico subtraction procedure was used to select genes specifically transcribed in immature seeds. The first selection step was based on EST abundance and the second step on microarray data analysis.

The objective of the first step was to identify genes having ESTs only from immature seeds and not from other organs. We divided the Arabidopsis EST libraries deposited in the TIGR Arabidopsis Gene Index [29] into three categories, according to the organs they were made from (Additional file 1):

a) Immature seed: this includes 10,854 ESTs from four cDNA libraries (Figure 1).

b) Other tissues: this includes 50,992 ESTs from 78 cDNA libraries obtained from vegetative tissues, non-pollinated flowers and dry seeds.

c) Non-informative: this includes libraries obtained from mixed organs and whole plants, including libraries from siliques.

Subtraction was done based on the EST contigs and gene assignations in TIGR Arabidopsis Gene Index [29]. We selected genes having corresponding EST sequences in category a (immature seeds) and not in category b (other tissues). 640 genes passed our first subtraction criteria (Additional file 2). Two correspond to chloroplast genes, three to mitochondrial genes and 26 had homology to parts of the Arabidopsis genome in which no genes have been reported.

The second selection step was based on the Arabidopsis Affymetrix GeneChip® average data available on the Genevestigator analysis tool site [2426]. We used the meta-analyzer program, which performs a heat map of normalized signal intensity values, corresponding to the different organs of the plant, for each gene. Values range from 0 to 100, 100 being the highest level of expression. We selected the genes using the following criteria:

(i) The expression in seeds should be higher than 80.

(ii) The expression in other organs should be lower than 5, except for siliques, carpels and inflorescences, as these three organs could contain immature seeds at the very early stages after pollination. Detected level 5 is probably low, but was chosen in order to avoid possible errors in the normalisation algorithm in the meta-analyzer program.

(iii) The expression level in seeds should be higher or equal to the expression in siliques, carpels or inflorescences.

49 of the 634 selected genes were not considered in the second analysis because they are not included in the Arabidopsis Affymetrix 22K GeneChip®. Of the remaining 585 genes, 49 (8%) fulfilled the selection criteria and may represent genes specifically expressed in immature seeds (Table 1). From the non-selected genes, 51% did not fit the selection condition (i), 96% the selection condition (ii) and 35% the selection condition (iii). Surprisingly, 21% of the genes showed higher values in siliques than in seeds. The different conditions in which tissues were collected for cDNA synthesis and microarray hybridizations could explain these results.

Table 1 Genes selected by in silico subtraction

The advantage of the selection method is demonstrated by the presence of several genes already characterized as specifically expressed in seeds, such as: abi3 [30]; At1g48130, encoding a peroxiredoxin (PER1) whose expression is restricted to seeds [31]; At1g67100, which is homologous to the Brassica Bn15D17A gene, highly and specifically expressed in embryos and seed coat at the early stages of seed development [32]; and At5g07190 and At5g55240, which encode embryo-specific proteins isolated in the course of a differential display experiment [33].

We also tested the direct application of the microarray subtraction without EST selection. We chose the first 1,500 genes from chromosome 1 (according to the AGI code) included in the Arabidopsis Affymetrix 22K GeneChip® (from At1g01010 to At1g18340). 28 of the 1,500 genes (1.9%) fell within the microarray-based selection criteria. If there is the same proportion in the whole genome, about 550 genes would be selected. These results indicate that Genevestigator may be a useful tool to investigate organ specific gene expression in Arabidopsis. However, data obtained from Genevestigator is based on the normalised average signal intensity values obtained from several array experiments [2426]. The normalisation algorithms used to generate Genevestigator values could introduce false positives and negatives, particularly for genes with low levels of expression. In consequence, combining Genevestigator results with EST abundance data gives a more reliable dataset of genes specifically expressed in a certain organ, seeds in our case.

Experimental validation of the patterns of expression of the selected genes

We used RT-PCR to check our selection procedure (Figure 2). Ten genes were selected, five of which were only used in the EST based selection and not the microarray, and the other five genes passed both selection steps. Two genes were used as additional controls: actin, which is expressed in all tissues, and AtEm6, which is specifically expressed during late embryogenesis [34]. All 10 genes analyzed showed higher expression levels in siliques, but silique specificity is, in general, higher in the genes selected by EST and microarray than in the genes selected only by EST subtraction. Two of the genes in the EST and microarray group, At1g67100 and At5g22470, gave low levels of amplification in rosette leaves and At1g67100 also in stem. This difference between Genevestigator and experimental data could be a consequence of different levels of detection in RT-PCR and microarray experiments or different experimental conditions. They do not indicate strong bias in the results. EST and microarray based selection produces a specific, expression-based, list of genes.

Figure 2

RT-PCR analysis of the expression profiles of ten genes isolated by in silico screening. "EST + microarray" indicates genes isolated by the combination of EST selection and microarray data analyses. "EST" indicates genes isolated only by EST selection. Siliques 1 to 3 correspond to whole siliques at different stages of development (1, young green; 2, green fully developed; 3, desiccating siliques). Siliques I to V correspond to siliques at different stages of development (I, 0–4 daf; II, 4–8 daf; III, 8–12 daf; IV, 12–16 daf; V, 17–21 daf). In each case, the size of the bands was as expected.

Seed specific expression was further demonstrated by in situ hybridization for the At5g22470 gene encoding a Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase family protein (PARP) (Figure 3). The At5g22470 transcripts were detected specifically in the embryo and not in the endosperm, pericarp, valves or septum. The profile of the expression of the At5g22470 gene is consistent with the predicted seed specific transcription.

Figure 3

In-situ hybridization analysis of a seed-specifically expressed gene. Seed-specific transcript labelling of embryos at the late torpedo stage as shown by in situ hybridization of transverse sections of Arabidopsis siliques probed with digoxigenin-labelled At5g22470 mRNA, viewed under bright-field optics.

The RT-PCR experiments and the presence of genes known to be specifically expressed in seed demonstrate that the selection procedure identifies genes specifically, or at least, predominantly, expressed in developing seeds. The relatively low number of genes selected is probably a consequence of the small number of initial ESTs corresponding to immature seeds (11,032 sequences). This is especially true in the case of genes only expressed during very early stages of seed development, for which only 232 ESTs are available. A recent report showed that only 16,115 of Arabidopsis genes are represented in the EST databases [35]. An additional problem is that not all the genes are represented in the Affymetrix 22K GeneChip®. We estimate that, if all genes were present in EST and microarray databases about a hundred would have been selected by our in silico method. It has been proposed that the developmental processes occurring during embryogenesis are active during the vegetative development of the plant, therefore some genes may also be expressed in other growing organs of the plant, and so not seed specific.

Functional classification of the selected genes

The 49 selected seed-specific genes were grouped into different functional categories (Table 2) according to their predicted gene products, based on the Gene Ontology (GO) Consortium through the Arabidopsis consortium information [28]. The data were compared with the functional categories assigned for all Arabidopsis genes [36].

Table 2 Functional categories of the seed specific genes

14 of the selected genes correspond to genes of unknown function (28.6%). This is lower but not significantly different (Fisher's exact test, α = 0.05) to the percentage obtained for the total genome (38.4%). Particularly interesting is At1g62060, whose function is unknown but is represented in databases by a total of 57 EST sequences (32 from immature seed libraries). Two of the genes encode germin-like proteins (At3g04170 and At3g04190), and four have been listed as seed or embryo specific genes of unknown function (At1g67100, At3g12960, At5g07190 and At5g55240).

Genes in the "nutrient reservoir" category represent 20.4% of the selection and include ten genes, four encoding oleosins, three globulins, two cruciferins and one a patatin-like protein. Accumulation of seed storage proteins is a highly seed specific process [37], so it is not surprising that the proportion of these genes in the selected group is significantly higher than that obtained for the whole genome (0.2%).

The third category is "response to abiotic stress", which includes six genes (12.2%), and is significantly more abundant than in the whole genome (3.1%). This is an indication of the importance of genes providing stress-tolerance in correct seed development. Three of the genes encode oxidative stress-related enzymes, the function of two genes is related to desiccation (At3g62730 and At5g44310), and one is an ABA and stress inducible gene (At5g62490).

Five genes involved in carbohydrate metabolism were selected (10.2%). This percentage is significantly higher than that observed for the whole genome (2.4%). This category includes a gene encoding a xyloglucan:xyloglucosyl transferase (At3g48580), an enzyme (E.C. involved in the biosynthesis of the cell wall. It also includes a gene encoding a sucrose synthase (At5g49190). Sucrose represents a signal for differentiation during embryo development and up-regulates storage-associated gene expression [38].

Five genes involved in protein modification, localization or degradation were selected (10.2%), two of them being proteases (At3g54940 and At5g09640). No genes involved in translation were selected, even though these represent 2.7% of the genes in the whole genome, nor any involved in transport and subcellular trafficking, even though these represent 8.7% of the genes in the whole genome.

Four genes involved in different aspects of development (8%) were selected. Two of them are involved in cell wall synthesis or modification (At5g59170, encoding a cell wall protein precursor, extensin; and At3g60730, encoding a pectinesterase-like protein). This is an indication of the high rate of synthesis of new cell wall during seed development, and could also be an indication of the importance of specific cell wall components in co-ordinating gene expression programmes during embryo development [39], an effect observed in immature maize embryos [40]. The number of selected genes involved in development is not significantly higher than in the whole genome (60%). This is not surprising as the whole genome contains several genes involved, for example, in flower or root development. A third gene encodes an auxin-responsive GH3 family protein (At1g48660). Auxins are important signalling molecules involved in shoot/root axis establishment, among other processes [41].

Two genes involved in the regulation of gene expression (40%) were selected : abi3 and a gene encoding a CCCH-type zinc finger protein (At1g03790). Although not significantly, this number is lower than that observed for the whole genome (7.4%). The reduced number of transcription factor genes selected is surprising, but recent data from global analysis of gene expression indicate that the number of transcription factor genes specifically expressed during seed development is relatively low compared with other organs [8, 42]. The expression of several MADS-box genes have been analyzed in different Arabidopsis tissues and it was found that, although many of these genes are expressed in embryonic tissue culture, few of them are exclusively expressed in this tissue [42]. Similarly, the number of specifically expressed transcription factor genes in developing siliques is relatively low compared to other tissues [8]. An additional explanation could be that, as this category of genes has relatively low levels of expression, they may be under-represented in EST collections used for selection.

Finally, two genes involved in respiration and energy (4.1%) and one in secondary metabolism (2.0%) (At1g14950 encoding a major latex protein type 1) were selected. Interestingly, two of the most highly represented categories in the genome are not represented in our selection: metabolism (6.4%) and transcription and splicing (6.1%). Nor were any genes detected for cell division, metabolism of amino acids, nucleic acid or lipids, defense or photosynthesis. As these genes are involved in general cell processes, they are expressed in several tissues and organs and they are unlikely to be selected in a seed-specific subtraction.

Gene redundancy and mutant phenotypes

Mutational approaches have been extensively used in Arabidopsis to identify gene functions [3]. Mutation in about 800 genes produced loss of function phenotypes in Arabidopsis [6]. Of these, about 250 produce an altered embryo. Based on the information available in the Arabidopsis information resource (TAIR) [28] and Seedgenes [7], two of the 49 genes have a mutant phenotype (4%) (Table 1), and in only one of them the mutation produces alterations in embryo development (abi3). Gene redundancy may explain the reduced number of mutants detected. Many Arabidopsis genes are in tandem arrays or segmental duplications [43]. We examined how many of the genes in our selection were part of gene tandem arrays or duplicated in different parts of the genome (Table 1). 11 of the selected genes (22%) are duplicated, which is higher than that observed in the whole genome (17%) (p-value = 0.33 in Fisher's exact test).

Patterns of gene expression during silique and seed development

The patterns of expression during seed development were investigated for each of the selected genes. Expression data was obtained from the Digital Northern tool in Genevestigator [24], corresponding to microarray hybridization of Affymetrix ATH1GeneChip® microarrays using labelled cDNAs of siliques and seeds at different stages of development, from mid-globular to green cotyledon embryos [9]. We used SOTA analysis in the TMEV 3.1 analysis package to identify expression patterns during silique and seed development (Figure 4). From this analysis, we can distinguish four major patterns of expression (Table 1):

Figure 4

Expression profiles during seed development showing four different patterns of expression in the subtracted genes. Expression data are based on the microarray results [9]. Blue, pattern I; yellow, pattern IIa; red, pattern IIb; green, pattern IIc. Solid lines correspond to average expression and shaded areas to the standard errors. Developmental stages: 3, siliques with embryos at the mid-globular to early heart embryo stage; 4, siliques with embryos at the early to late heart-embryo stage; 5, siliques with embryos at the late heart to mid torpedo stages; 6, seeds with embryos at the late torpedo stage; 7, seeds with embryos at the late torpedo to early walking-stick stage; 8, seeds with embryos at the walking-stick to early curled-cotyledon stages; 9, seeds with embryos at the curled-cotyledon to early green-cotyledon stages; 10, seeds with embryos at the green cotyledon stage. The dotted line corresponds to 25% of the maximum expression.

Group I: higher expression at early seed development. Genes that reach the maximum level of expression between late torpedo and early walking-stick embryo stages. This group includes five genes: At5g09640, encoding a serine carboxypeptidase, At5g49190, encoding a sucrose synthase, At2g34700, encoding a proline rich glycoprotein, and two genes encoding germin-like proteins (At3g04170 and At3g04190).

Group II: higher expression at mid seed development or later. The expression increases progressively, reaching the maximum level at the early cotyledon stage or later. In turn, SOTA analysis divided this class into three groups that can be distinguished by the stage at which their transcription level is higher than 25% of the maximum:

• IIa. Very early expression. The expression increases to more than 25% of the maximum before the early embryo stage. Four genes are included in this group. At5g48100, encoding a laccase, At4g36700, encoding a globulin-like protein, At4g37050, encoding a patatin-like protein, and At1g62060, encoding a protein of unknown function.

• IIb. Early expression. The expression increases to more than 25% of the maximum between the early heart and late torpedo stages. This group has 23 genes and includes the majority of the "nutrient reserve" genes.

• IIc. Mid stage expression. The expression increases to more than 25% of the maximum later than the late torpedo stage. It includes 17 genes of diverse functions.


Despite the technical problems associated with the relatively reduced number of Arabidopsis ESTs available, we have demonstrated here that the combination of EST profiling with microarray-based in silico selection may be a quick and cheap first step in the identification of Arabidopsis genes specifically expressed in certain organs, or in response to certain environmental stimuli. The same method could be applied to several other plant species in which EST sequences are available from several different organs and under different conditions (maize, wheat, rice, barley soybean, loblolly pine, etc). However, microarray data available for species other than Arabidopsis are very limited and less openly accessible, severely limiting the applicability of our two-step selection approach. An increase in EST sequencing, using more specific libraries, and in the contents of public microarray databases will greatly contribute to the efficiency of the method in plants.


Plant material

Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 plants were grown in soil, in growth chambers, at 22°C, with 18 h day. Plants used for root RNA extractions were grown on 0.8% (w/v) MS basal salt mixture agar plates in growth chambers, at 22°C, with 18 h day.

cDNA library construction and tag sequencing of expressed sequences

Total RNA was extracted from frozen seeds as previously described [44] and treated with RNAse-free DNAseI (Promega). Double stranded cDNA was built using the SMART cDNA Library Construction Kit (Clontech) according to the manufacturer's instructions, and introduced into the pCRII-TOPO (Invitrogen) vector for sequencing using the TOPO TA Cloning kit (Invitrogen).

For sequencing, DNA was amplified using PCR primers specific for the plasmid vector (5'-GTCACGACGTTGTTAAACGACGGC-3' and 5'-GGAAACAGCTATGACCATGATTACG-3') and sequencing was carried out using a 5' specific primer (5'-GTATCAACGCAGAGTCG-3') and BigDye Terminator (Applied Biosystems) technology according to the manufacturer's instructions, in an ABI PRISM 3700 (Applied Biosystems). Cloning vector sequences were masked, and low quality and short (<190 bp) sequences removed. Homology searches for function assignment were performed using the BLASTN program in the Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR) [28]. EST sequences were deposited in the GeneBank database under the Accession numbers AM111128-AM111305.

In Silico Subtraction

Newly sequenced expressed sequence tags and 10,854 EST sequences of three libraries from immature Arabidopsis seeds (5564, 5576 and #C6I in TIGR Arabidopsis Gene Index [29] were used as the initial source of immature seed sequences. In silico subtraction was done using a second set of EST libraries that did not contain immature seed sequences (50,992 ESTs from 78 libraries). Comparisons were based on the tentative gene contigs classification in the TIGR Arabidopsis database [29]. Libraries constructed from mixed tissues which could include immature seeds, such as immature siliques, were not considered for the subtraction. Subtraction was done by comparing the lists of genes that are represented in "immature seed" EST libraries with the list of genes represented by in "other organ" EST libraries.

A second selection step was based on the Arabidopsis Affymetrix GeneChip® data, available from the Meta-analyzer tool of the Genevestigator software [2426]. Genes represented in the arrays with more than one probe were selected only when the results with all the probes passed the selection criteria.

Gene Ontology

Functional characterization was performed according to the Gene Ontology (GO) Consortium through the Arabidopsis consortium information [28]. Fisher's exact test was performed using the MATFORSK, Norwegian Food Research Institute online facility [45, 46].


Total RNAs were extracted from frozen organs of Arabidopsis as previously described [44] and treated with RNAse-free DNAseI (Promega). Total pre-treated RNA (2 μg) was reverse transcribed with the Omniscript reverse transcriptase kit (Qiagen) using an oligo-dT primer. cDNAs were amplified with specific primers (Table 3), and controls, with non-reverse transcribed RNA, were also used to detect gDNA contamination. The actin gene was used as a control for RNA loading. PCR reactions were performed using 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 360 μg/ml BSA and 1 pmol μL-1 of each primer in a final volume of 50 μL. The reaction mixtures were heated to 95°C for 5 min, followed by 28 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 55°C for 30 sec, and 72°C for 90 sec. Reactions were completed by incubating at 72°C for 10 min. The amounts of template cDNA and the number of PCR cycles were determined for each gene to ensure that amplification occurred in the linear range and allowed for good comparison of the amplified products. At least two independent analyses were carried out on the different RNA samples. Reactions were performed in a Minicycler (MJ Research, Waltham, MA) thermal cycler.

Table 3 Primers used for RT-PCR analysis

In situ hybridization

The protocol for in situ hybridization was done as previously described [47] except for the labelling of the probes and the detection of the signal. Probes were synthesized and labelled using the Boehringer digoxigenin system, and detected using the BM purple AP substrate (Boehringer). The probe was synthesized from the product of PCR amplification cloned into the pCRII-TOPO vector (Invitrogene).

Gene distribution in tandem arrays and mutants

The presence of the selected genes in tandem arrays was based on previously described data [43]. Genes whose loss-of-function give an embryo mutant phenotype were determined according to data previously collected [6, 7].

Expression cluster analysis

For expression cluster analysis, we used the TIGR Multi Experiment Viewer (TMEV) software [48]. Original data was obtained from the Genevestigator tool [2426] and correspond to a microarray analysis of silique and seed development [9].


  1. 1.

    Olsen OA: Endosperm development: cellularization and cell fate specification. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 2001, 52: 233-267.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Willemsen V, Scheres B: Mechanisms of pattern formation in plant embryogenesis. Annu Rev Genet. 2004, 38: 587-614.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    McElver J, Tzafrir I, Aux G, Rogers R, Ashby C, Smith K, Thomas C, Schetter A, Zhou Q, Cushman MA, Tossberg J, Nickle T, Levin JZ, Law M, Meinke D, Patton D: Insertional mutagenesis of genes required for seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics. 2001, 159: 1751-1763.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Chaudhury AM, Koltunow A, Payne T, Luo M, Tucker MR, Dennis ES, Peacock WJ: Control of early seed development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2001, 17: 677-699.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Meinke DW, Meinke LK, Showalter TC, Schissel AM, Mueller LA, Tzafrir I: A sequence-based map of Arabidopsis genes with mutant phenotypes. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131: 409-418.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Tzafrir I, Pena-Muralla R, Dickerman A, Berg M, Rogers R, Hutchens S, Sweeney TC, McElver J, Aux G, Patton D, Meinke D: Identification of genes required for embryo development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135: 1206-1220.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    SeedGenes Project. []

  8. 8.

    Ma L, Sun N, Liu X, Jiao Y, Zhao H, Deng XW: Organ-specific Expression of Arabidopsis Genome during development. Plant Physiol. 2005, 138: 80-91.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Schmid M, Davison TS, Henz SR, Pape UJ, Demar M, Vingron M, Scholkopf B, Weigel D, Lohmann JU: A gene expression map of Arabidopsis thaliana development. Nat Genet. 2005, 37: 501-506.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bernstein SL, Borst DE, Neuder ME, Wong P: Characterization of the human fovea cDNA library and regional differential gene expression in the human retina. Genomics. 1996, 32: 301-308.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Vasmatzis G, Essand M, Brinkmann U, Lee B, Pastan I: Discovery of three genes specifically expressed in human prostate by expressed sequence tag database analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95: 300-304.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Itoh K, Okubo K, Utiyama H, Hirano T, Yoshii J, Matsubara K: Expression profile of active genes in granulocytes. Blood. 1998, 92: 1432-1441.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bortoluzzi S, d'Alessi F, Romualdi C, Danieli GA: The human adult skeletal muscle transcriptional profile reconstructed by a novel computational approach. Genome Res. 2000, 10: 344-349.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Huminiecki L, Bicknell R: In silico cloning of novel endothelial-specific genes. Genome Res. 2000, 10: 1796-1806.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Miner D, Rajkovic A: Identification of expressed sequence tags preferentially expressed in human placentas by in silico subtraction. Prenat Diagn. 2003, 23: 410-419.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Baranova AV, Lobashev AV, Ivanov DV, Krukovskaya LL, Yankovsky NK, Kozlov AP: In silico screening for tumour-specific expressed sequences in human genome. FEBS Lett. 2001, 508: 143-148.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    NCBI Expressed Sequence Tags database. []

  18. 18.

    Ogihara Y, Mochida K, Nemoto Y, Murai K, Yamazaki Y, Shin-I T, Kohara Y: Correlated clustering and virtual display of gene expression patterns in the wheat life cycle by large-scale statistical analyses of expressed sequence tags. Plant J. 2003, 33: 1001-1011.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Casu RE, Dimmock CM, Chapman SC, Grof CP, McIntyre CL, Bonnett GD, Manners JM: Identification of differentially expressed transcripts from maturing stem of sugarcane by in silico analysis of stem expressed sequence tags and gene expression profiling. Plant Mol Biol. 2004, 54: 503-517.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Redman JC, Haas BJ, Tanimoto G, Town CD: Development and evaluation of an Arabidopsis whole genome Affymetrix probe array. Plant J. 2004, 38: 545-561.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Honys D, Twell D: Transcriptome analysis of haploid male gametophyte development in Arabidopsis. Genome Biol. 2004, 5: R85-

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lloyd JC, Zakhleniuk OV: Responses of primary and secondary metabolism to sugar accumulation revealed by microarray expression analysis of the Arabidopsis mutant, pho3. J Exp Bot. 2004, 55: 1221-1230.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Menges M, de Jager SM, Gruissem W, Murray JA: Global analysis of the core cell cycle regulators of Arabidopsis identifies novel genes, reveals multiple and highly specific profiles of expression and provides a coherent model for plant cell cycle control. Plant J. 2005, 41: 546-566.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Genevestigator. []

  25. 25.

    Zimmermann P, Hirsch-Hoffmann M, Hennig L, Gruissem W: GENEVESTIGATOR. Arabidopsis Microarray Database and Analysis Toolbox. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136: 2621-2632.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Zimmermann P, Hennig L, Gruissem W: Gene-expression analysis and network discovery using Genevestigator. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10: 407-409.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    White JA, Todd J, Newman T, Focks N, Girke T, Martínez de Ilárduya O, Jaworski JG, Ohlrogge JB, Benning C: A New Set of Arabidopsis Expressed Sequence Tags from Developing Seeds. The Metabolic Pathway from Carbohydrates to Seed Oil. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124: 1582-1594.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    The Arabidopsis Information Resource, TAIR. []

  29. 29.

    TIGR Arabidopsis Gene Index. []

  30. 30.

    Giraudat J, Hauge BM, Valon C, Smalle J, Parcy F, Goodman HM: Isolation of the Arabidopsis ABI3 gene by positional cloning. The Plant Cell. 1992, 4: 1251-1261.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Haslekas C, Stacy RA, Nygaard V, Culianez-Macia FA, Aalen RB: The expression of a peroxiredoxin antioxidant gene, AtPer1, in Arabidopsis thaliana is seed-specific and related to dormancy. Plant Mol Biol. 1998, 36: 833-845.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Dong J, Keller WA, Yan W, Georges F: Gene expression at early stages of Brassica napus seed development as revealed by transcript profiling of seed-abundant cDNAs. Planta. 2004, 218: 483-491.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Nuccio ML, Thomas TL: ATS1 and ATS3: two novel embryo-specific genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol. 1999, 39: 1153-1163.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Vicient CM, Hull G, Guilleminot J, Devic M, Delseny M: Differentialexpression of the Arabidopsis genes coding for Em-like proteins. J Exp Bot. 2000, 51: 1211-1220.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Rudd S: Expressed sequence tags: alternative or complement to whole genome sequences?. Trends Plant Sci. 2003, 8: 321-329.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Berardini TZ, Mundodi S, Reiser L, Huala E, Garcia-Hernandez M, Zhang P, Mueller LA, Yoon J, Doyle A, Lander G, Moseyko N, Yoo D, Xu I, Zoeckler B, Montoya M, Miller N, Weems D, Rhee SY: Functional Annotation of the Arabidopsis Genome Using Controlled Vocabularies. Plant Physiology. 2004, 135: 745-755.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Vicente-Carbajosa J, Carbonero P: Seed maturation: developing an intrusive phase to accomplish a quiescent state. Int J Dev Biol. 2005, 49: 645-651.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Borisjuk L, Rolletschek H, Radchuk R, Weschke W, Wobus U, Weber H: Seed development and differentiation: a role for metabolic regulation. Plant Biol. 2004, 6: 375-386.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Souter M, Lindsey K: Polarity and signalling in plant embryogenesis. J Exp Bot. 2000, 51: 971-983.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Jose-Estanyol M, Ruiz-Avila L, Puigdomenech P: A maize embryo-specific gene encodes a proline-rich and hydrophobic protein. The Plant Cell. 1992, 4: 413-423.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Bai S, Chen L, Yund MA, Sung ZR: Mechanisms of plant embryo development. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2000, 50: 61-88.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Lehti-Shiu MD, Adamczyk BJ, Fernandez DE: Expression of MADS-box genes during the embryonic phase in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol. 2005, 58: 89-107.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Haberer G, Hindemitt T, Meyers BC, Mayer KF: Transcriptional similarities, dissimilarities, and conservation of cis-elements in duplicated genes of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136: 3009-3022.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Vicient CM, Delseny M: Isolation of total RNA from Arabidopsis thaliana seeds. Anal Biochem. 1999, 268: 412-413.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    MATFORSK (Norwegian Food Research Institute) Øyvind Langsrudonline Fisher's exact test facility. []

  46. 46.

    Agresti A: A Survey of Exact Inference for Contegency Tables. Statitical Science. 1992, 7: 131-153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Cox KH, DeLeon DV, Angerer LM, Angerer RC: Detection of mRNAs in sea urchin embryos by in situ hybridization using asymmetric RNA probes. Dev Biol. 1984, 101: 485-502.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    TIGR Multi Experiment Viewer (TMEV) software. []

  49. 49.

    Bowman JL: Arabidopsis: an Atlas of Morphology and Development. 1993, Berlin & New York: Springer-Verlag,

    Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was carried out thanks to grants BIO2001-1721 and BIO2004-01577 from the Plan Nacional de Investigación Científica y Técnica and a grant from the program MAZE, European Union, and within the framework of Centre de Referència de Biotecnologia de la Generalitat de Catalunya. C.B. was the recipient of a fellowship from the Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona – Fundación Presidente Allende. C.M.V. is the recipient of a "Ramon y Cajal" contract from the Spanish Ministry of Science.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos M Vicient.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

CB carried out the experimental molecular genetic studies. Database searches and analyses were performed by CMV and CB. PP supervised the study and wrote the manuscript jointly with CMV and CB.

Electronic supplementary material

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Becerra, C., Puigdomenech, P. & Vicient, C.M. Computational and experimental analysis identifies Arabidopsis genes specifically expressed during early seed development. BMC Genomics 7, 38 (2006).

Download citation


  • Seed Development
  • Immature Seed
  • Tandem Array
  • Early Seed Development
  • Arabidopsis ESTs