Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Genomics

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Fungi have three tetraspanin families with distinct functions

  • Karine Lambou1,
  • Didier Tharreau2,
  • Annegret Kohler3,
  • Catherine Sirven4,
  • Mélanie Marguerettaz1,
  • Crystel Barbisan1,
  • Adrienne C Sexton5,
  • Ellen M Kellner6,
  • Francis Martin3,
  • Barbara J Howlett5,
  • Marc J Orbach6 and
  • Marc-Henri Lebrun1Email author
BMC Genomics20089:63

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-63

©  Lambou et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

Received: 06 September 2007

Accepted: 03 February 2008

Published: 03 February 2008

Abstract

Background

Tetraspanins are small membrane proteins that belong to a superfamily encompassing 33 members in human and mouse. These proteins act as organizers of membrane-signalling complexes. So far only two tetraspanin families have been identified in fungi. These are Pls1, which is required for pathogenicity of the plant pathogenic ascomycetes, Magnaporthe grisea, Botrytis cinerea and Colletotrichum lindemuthianum, and Tsp2, whose function is unknown. In this report, we describe a third family of tetraspanins (Tsp3) and a new family of tetraspanin-like proteins (Tpl1) in fungi. We also describe expression of some of these genes in M. grisea and a basidiomycete, Laccaria bicolor, and also their functional analysis in M. grisea.

Results

The exhaustive search for tetraspanins in fungal genomes reveals that higher fungi (basidiomycetes and ascomycetes) contain three families of tetraspanins (Pls1, Tsp2 and Tsp3) with different distribution amongst phyla. Pls1 is found in ascomycetes and basidiomycetes, whereas Tsp2 is restricted to basidiomycetes and Tsp3 to ascomycetes. A unique copy of each of PLS1 and TSP3 was found in ascomycetes in contrast to TSP2, which has several paralogs in the basidiomycetes, Coprinus cinereus and Laccaria bicolor. A tetraspanin-like family (Tpl1) was also identified in ascomycetes. Transcriptional analyses in various tissues of L. bicolor and M. grisea showed that PLS1 and TSP2 are expressed in all tissues in L. bicolor and that TSP3 and TPL1 are overexpressed in the sexual fruiting bodies (perithecia) and mycelia of M. grisea, suggesting that these genes are not pseudogenes. Phenotypic analysis of gene replacementmutants Δtsp3 and Δtpl1 of M. grisea revealed a reduction of the pathogenicity only on rice, in contrast to Δpls1 mutants, which are completely non-pathogenic on barley and rice.

Conclusion

A new tetraspanin family (Tsp3) and a tetraspanin-like protein family (Tpl1) have been identified in fungi. Functional analysis by gene replacement showed that these proteins, as well as Pls1, are involved in the infection process of the plant pathogenic fungus M. grisea. The next challenge will be to decipher the role(s) of tetraspanins in a range of symbiotic, saprophytic and human pathogenic fungi.

Keywords

Fruiting BodyLaccaria BicolorLarge Extracellular LoopTarget Gene ReplacementTetraspanin Family

Background

Tetraspanins are a superfamily of small integral membrane proteins that were first identified in mammals as cell-specific antigens [1] and, since then, in fishes, insects, worms, sponges [2] and fungi [2, 3]. They are not found in plants, although tetraspanin-like proteins were identified in Arabidopsis thaliana [4, 5]. To date, at least 33 distinct tetraspanins have been identified in humans, 37 in Drosophila melanogaster and 20 in Caenorhabditis elegans [2]. Animal tetraspanins interact tightly and specifically with other membrane proteins and have been proposed to act as molecular facilitators of membrane protein complexes [1, 6]. Animal tetraspanins are also able to interact with other tetraspanins to form a scaffold that promotes the recruitment of tetraspanin-associated proteins, hence creating a web [7]. As a consequence of this complexity, tetraspanin webs from different cell types differ markedly in their protein composition and probably also in their cellular function. This may explain the diversity of phenotypes observed among tetraspanin knockout mutants in animals. Indeed, tetraspanin null mutants are altered in diverse unrelated processes such as sperm-egg fusion, susceptibility to parasites or viruses, neuronal or lymphocyte cell-cell interactions, cell adhesion, motility and polarity and protein trafficking [1, 6, 8].

Although tetraspanins display limited amino acid sequence similarity, they share conserved structural hallmarks consisting of four transmembrane domains (TM1 to TM4), a small extracellular loop (ECL1), an intracellular loop (ICL) and a large extracellular loop (ECL2) containing a characteristic cysteine-based pattern [9, 10]. In fungi, the first tetraspanin identified was in the plant pathogenic fungus M. grisea and was named Pls1 ([3]; Figure 1). Since then, genes homologous to PLS1 have been identified in other ascomycetes [11] and basidiomycetes [2]. The functional role of Pls1 in the fungal cell has been investigated in three plant pathogenic ascomycetes [12], namely M. grisea (MgPls1, [3]), Botrytis cinerea (BcPls1, [13]) and Colletotrichum lindemuthianum (ClPls1, [14]). These fungi are responsible for major diseases of agriculturally important plants, M. grisea causing the most devastating fungal disease of rice (blast) worldwide, B. cinerea being a necrotrophic pathogen affecting more than 200 different host plants and C. lindemuthianum causing anthracnose diseases on a wide range of crops and ornamental plants. During the infection process, these fungi differentiate a specialized cell called the appressorium that is able to perforate the plant cuticle and cell wall, allowing the fungus to penetrate into host tissues. The ΔMgpls1, ΔBcpls1 and ΔClpls1 null mutants were all non-pathogenic on intact host plant tissues. Although the mutants could differentiate appressoria, these infection structures were unable to direct the penetration of the fungus into host plant tissues [3, 13, 14]. These results demonstrate that Pls1 tetraspanins are involved in a function conserved among fungi that is essential for appressorium-mediated penetration.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Schematic structure of Pls1 tetraspanins. Tetraspanins contain four transmembrane domains (TM1 to TM4) with conserved polar/charged residues (pink circles), a small extracellular loop (ECL1), a small intracellular loop (ICL) and a large extracellular loop (ECL2). ECL2 contains a CCG motif and further two conserved cysteine residues (yellow circles). The N-terminal and C-terminal tails are intracellular. These cysteine residues allow formation of two disulphide bridges (red lines), crucial for the folding of ECL2. One putative palmitoylation site is located proximal to TM4 (green circle).

Previous studies suggested that fungal genomes possess a single tetraspanin gene [11]. However, analysis of recently sequenced fungal genomes revealed that besides Pls1 orthologs, basidiomycetes have other tetraspanins called Tsp2 [2]. This prompted us to systematically search for novel tetraspanins in fungal genomes and EST databases to better characterize this protein family in fungi. Using low stringency BlastP and HMM (Hidden Markov Model) searches using the PFAM tetraspanin profile (PF00335), we identified a novel tetraspanin (Tsp3) and a tetraspanin-like protein (Tpl1) in M. grisea and their orthologs in other ascomycetes. Furthermore, genes from the TSP2 family were identified in newly available basidiomycete genomes and they displayed a complex evolutionary history with numerous paralogs. The expression profiles of PLS1, TSP2, TSP3 and TPL1 were determined by quantitative RT-PCR in M. grisea or by microarray analysisin the symbiotic L. bicolor. Expression of these genes was also estimated in silico by compiling their occurrence in EST or cDNA libraries. Finally, a functional study of TSP3 and TPL1 was performed in M. grisea, whereby deletion mutants were constructed by targeted gene replacement and compared to the existing Δpls1 mutant. In marked contrast to this latter mutant, which was fully non-pathogenic on barley and rice, the Δtsp3 and Δtpl1 mutants were reduced in pathogenicity only on rice. Thus deletion of these genes has a host-specific effect on the pathogenicity of M. grisea which is different from that of the PLS1 deletion.

Results

Pls1 tetraspanins are widespread in ascomycetes and basidiomycetes

Proteins homologous to Pls1 [see Additional file 1] and [Additional file 2] were identified using Blastp in all available sequenced genomes of ascomycetes (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Leptosphaeria maculans, Podospora anserina, Chaetomium globosum, Trichoderma reesei, Fusarium verticilloides, Nectria haematococca, Stagonospora nodorum, Coccidioides posadasii) and basidiomycetes (Laccaria bicolor), except Ustilago maydis, Cryptoccocus neoformans, Aspergillus species, Mycosphaerella graminicola, and all Saccharomycotina species (hemi-ascomycetes). Another strategy based on the use of the tetraspanin HMM profile (PF00335) revealed a single Pls1 tetraspanin in the same fungal genomes. SsPLS1, LmPLS1, PaPLS1, GzPLS1, CpPLS1 cDNAs were obtained either from cDNA libraries or reconstructed from ESTs and used to define introns and start and stop codons in the corresponding genes.

The sequence conservation between the different Pls1 tetraspanins is essentially in the TM domains, some regions of the ECL2 including its cysteine-based pattern (CCGY-x(13)-C-x(11/19)-C-x(14)-TM4) and the C-terminal tail (Figure 2, [Additional file 1] and [Additional file 2]). The ECL1 sequences are more variable, as those in basidiomycete Pls1 proteins (17 aa) are shorter than in ascomycetes (26 aa). Similarly, the conserved motif in ICL from Pls1 proteins of basidiomycetes (QRNHVTLGLV) is very different from that found in Pls1 from ascomycetes (RGWLK). Three TM domains contain charged/polar amino acids (D in TM1, S/T in TM2, T in TM4) conserved among all Pls1 proteins. Some Pls1 proteins from ascomycetes have additional charged/polar amino acids (N in TM2, S/T in TM3 and D in TM4; see Figure 1 and [Additional file 1]). In animal tetraspanins, these conserved polar/charged amino acids are thought to stabilize interactions between transmembrane domains [10]. A putative palmitoylation site (cysteine residue) is located at the end of TM4 in most Pls1 tetraspanins, except those from the Leotiomycetes, Botrytis cinerea and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Figures 1 and 2, [Additional file 1]). In animals, the palmitoylation of several conserved juxtamembrane cysteine residues influences the formation of tetraspanin-enriched membrane microdomains [15–17]. A variable region is located in the ECL2 loop of fungal Pls1 tetraspanins (Figures 1 and 2, [Additional file 1]), between the last two cysteine residues whereas, it is located between the second and the last cysteine residues of the ECL2 in animal tetraspanins. Interestingly, in animals this variable region contains sites involved in specific tetraspanin protein-protein interactions [10]. The cysteine-based pattern of fungal Pls1 tetraspanins (CCGY-x(13)-C-x(11/19)-C-x(14)-TM4) contains a conserved tyrosine residue located after the CCG motif that is not in the cysteine-based pattern of animal tetraspanins (Figures 1 and 2, [Additional file 1] and [Additional file 2]). The cysteine-based pattern of ascomycete Pls1 EC2 (CCGY-x(13)-C-x(10)-GC-x(14)-TM4) is slightly different from that found in Pls1 from basidiomycetes (CCGY-x(13)-C-x(19)-C-x(14)-TM4, [Additional file 1] and [Additional file 2]) suggesting their ECL2 tertiary structure slightly differs from those of ascomycetes. The amino acid sequences of the C-terminal tail of fungal Pls1 tetraspanins are strongly conserved and are rich in charged/polar amino acids (average 70%). Indeed, these C-terminal tails display a conserved RxExERF/YxxIDxK motif found in Pls1 from ascomycetes as well as from basidiomycetes [see Additional file 1]. This conservation suggests that the C-terminal tail of fungal Pls1 tetraspanins plays a functional role as does that of animal tetraspanins [18, 19].
Figure 2
Figure 2

Structural comparison of fungal tetraspanins (Pls1, Tsp2, Tsp3) and tetraspanin like proteins (Tpl1). The Pls1, Tsp2 and Tsp3 tetraspanin families display the typical structure of tetraspanin: four transmembrane domains (TM1, TM2, TM3, TM4, yellow boxes) and a small extracellular loop (ECL1, gray line), a small intracellular loop (ICL, purple line), a large extracellular loop (ECL2, orange line), intracellular N-terminal (black line) and C-terminal (brown line) tails. ECL2 contains a CCG motif and further two conserved cysteine residues (red triangles). A. The Pls1 tetraspanin family contains conserved polar/charged residues in TM1, TM2, TM3 and TM4 (blue lines) and one putative palmitoylation site is proximal to TM4 (green triangle). B. The Tsp2 tetraspanin family displays large intracellular N-terminal and C-terminal tails. One putative conserved palmitoylation site is located at the end of TM4 (green triangle). C. The Tsp3 tetraspanin family has a short ECL1 and a large C-terminal tail. D. The Tpl1 tetraspanin-like proteins lack the typical cysteine-based pattern in their ECL2 (CCG motif and further two conserved cysteine residues). Nevertheless, their ECL2 regions contain two conserved cysteine residues close to TM3 and TM4.

Tsp2 tetraspanins are restricted to basidiomycetes

Prior to this study, the first set of Tsp2 tetraspanins was identified in basidiomycetes such as Coprinus cinereus (CcTsp2A, CcTsp2B, CcTsp2C), Phanerochaete chrysosporium (PcTsp2) and Cryptococcus neoformans (CnTsp2, [2]). Tsp2 proteins display a long N-terminal tail (83 to 200 aa) and a long C-terminal cytoplasmic tail (66 to 101 aa). These domain lengths are characteristic of the Tsp2 family as Pls1 tetraspanins contain only short N-terminal and C-terminal tails (3–5 and 17–22 aa, respectively, Figure 2 and [Additional file 3]). Furthermore, the C-terminal tails of Tsp2 proteins are not as rich in charged amino acids (30%) as those of Pls1 proteins (60–75%). We identified four homologues of TSP2 (LbTSP2A, LbTSP2B, LbTS2C and LbTSP2D) in the basidiomycete L. bicolor. The correspondingcDNAs reconstructed from ESTs were used to define introns and start/stop codons in the corresponding genes. This family displays all the structural hallmarks of tetraspanin secondary structure with four transmembrane domains, a small extracellular loop (ECL1, 19 aa), a small intracellular loop (ICL, 4 aa), a large extracellular loop (ECL2, 72 aa) with a typical cysteine-based pattern (CCGY/F-x(12)-CY/F-x(6)-GCK-x(13)-TM4) and a conserved C-terminal cytoplasmic tail (Figure 2, [Additional file 2] and [Additional file 3]). Three TM domains contain one or two conserved charged/polar amino acids (N and Y in TM1, S and T in TM2 and Y in TM3) as observed for animal and fungal Pls1 tetraspanins [10, 11]. One putative conserved palmitoylation site (a cysteine residue at the junction between a transmembrane domain and an intracellular domain) is located at the end of TM4, proximal to the inner side of the membrane according to the predicted fungal tetraspanin topology. Additionally, LbTsp2A and PcTsp2 display another putative palmitoylation site (cysteine residue) at the start of TM1, proximal to the inner side of the membrane. We were not able to identify proteins orthologous to Tsp2 in ascomycetes using blast analysis or the tetraspanin HMM profile.

Tsp3 is a novel tetraspanin family specific to ascomycetes

We identified a novel tetraspanin in M. grisea which we named MgTsp3, using the tetraspanin HMM profile (PF00335). MgTsp3 is a modified version of MGG_13913.5 and annotation errors were corrected using the TSP3 cDNA sequence. This novel tetraspanin displays the structural hallmarks of tetraspanins including a characteristic cysteine-based pattern (CCG-x(18/22)-C-x(9)-C-x(11)-TM4) and a C-terminal tail containing a high proportion of polar/charged amino acids (70%; Figures 2 and 3). However, it differs from Pls1 of ascomycetes in the following features: a lack of charged/polar amino acid in TM domains, a smaller ECL1 (8 aa compared to 26 aa), a longer ICL (22–25 aa compared to 8 aa) and a longer C-terminal tail (70–110 aa compared to 17–22 aa) similar in size to that of Tsp2 proteins from basidiomycetes (66 to 101 aa, Figure 2).
Figure 3
Figure 3

Alignment of Tsp3 tetraspanins. Sequences were aligned using ClustalX 1.8. Conserved amino acids are indicated in black (>80%), dark gray (>60%) and light gray (>40%). The transmembrane domains (TM) are circled in black, the small extracellular loop (ECL1), the small intracellular loop (ICL), the large extracellular loop (ECL2) are shown in gray, purple and orange lines, respectively. ECL2 contains a CCG motif and further two conserved cysteine residues (red). These cysteine residues allow formation of two disulphide bridges crucial for the folding of ECL2. Mg: Magnaporthe grisea, Pa: Podospora anserina, Nc: Neurospora crassa, Bc: Botrytis cinerea, Ss: Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Tr: Trichoderma reesei, Gz: Gibberella zea, An: Aspergillus niger, Ur:Uncinocarpus reesii. For a tetraspanin structural model, see Figure 1.

Proteins homologous to Tsp3 were detected only in ascomycetes, including P. anserina, T. reesei, N. crassa, C. globosum, G. zeae, S. nodorum, B. cinerea, S. sclerotiorum and Uncinocarpus reesii (Figure 3). A Tsp3 homologue was identified in Aspergillus niger, this being the first report of an Aspergillus tetraspanin (Figure 3). In marked contrast, the Tsp3 protein is absent from basidiomycete genomes. The amplification of MgTSP3 cDNA obtained by RT-PCR allowed the identification of three introns at positions 37, 66 and 595 bp. Other TSP3 genes were aligned to ESTs when available [see Additional file 2], allowing prediction of their exon positions and their corresponding proteins in N. crassa and S. sclerotiorum. The number of introns varies between one and four in the Sordariaceae, with a conserved intron at position 31 bp from the start codon [see Additional file 2]. TSP3 genes from Leotiomycetes (Botrytis cinerea and S. sclerotiorum) have four introns at conserved positions [see Additional file 2]. SnTsp3 and TrTsp3 did notdisplay four transmembrane domains; however, this is probably due to a sequence gap and an incorrect intron annotation, respectively. For this reason, these genes were not included in the comparative analysis. Overall Tsp3 sequences are not as conserved as Pls1 and Tsp2 proteins from the same range of species (Figures 3). In particular, ICL and C-terminal tail are not conserved, unlike that in Pls1 proteins (Figures 3).

Tpl1 is a tetraspanin-like protein restricted to ascomycetes

In addition to the tetraspanins described above, the M. grisea genomecontains a tetraspanin-like gene, which we have named TPL1 (MGG_08113.5). This gene was identified by use of the tetraspanin HMM profile (PF00335) not only in M. grisea but also in other ascomycetes such as C. globosum, S. nodorum, N. crassa, P. anserina and A. nidulans (Figure 4). In marked contrast, the Tpl1 protein is absent from basidiomycete genomes. The MgTPL1 cDNA was reconstructed from ESTs and used to define introns and start/stop codons. MgTPL1 has two introns at position 40 and 262 bp from ATG [see Additional file 2]. Tpl1 proteins display some structural hallmarks of tetraspanins such as the presence of four transmembrane domains, a small ECL1 loop (14 aa), a short ICL loop (6–12 aa), a large ECL2 loop (56–68 aa) and a C-terminal cytoplasmic tail (9–17 aa) similar in size to that of Pls1 tetraspanins (Figures 2 and 4, [Additional file 2]). However, Tpl1 proteins markedly differ from Pls1, Tsp2 and Tsp3 tetraspanins in that they lack the typical cysteine based-pattern in the ECL2. Instead, they have two conserved cysteine residues close to the TM3 and TM4, respectively (Figures 2 and 4). For this reason, we have classified these proteins as tetraspanin-like.
Figure 4
Figure 4

Alignment and phylogenetic tree of Tpl1 tetraspanins like. A. Alignment of Tpl1 tetraspanins. Sequences were aligned using ClustalX 1.8. Conserved amino acids are indicated in black (>80%), dark gray (>60%) and light gray (>40%). The transmembrane domains (TM) are circled in black, the small extracellular loop (ECL1), the small intracellular loop (ICL), the large extracellular loop (ECL2) are shown in gray, purple and orange lines, respectively. ECL2 contains two conserved cysteine residues (red). Mg: Magnaporthe grisea, Cg: Chaetomium globosum, Nc: Neurospora crassa, Pa: Podospora anserina, Sn:Stagonospora nodorum, An: Aspergillus nidulans, Ac: Aspergillus clavatus. (For a structural model, see Figure 1). B. Phylogenetic tree of fungal Tpl1 proteins. Aligned sequences were analyzed using maximum likelihood from PHYML and XP_501745 from Yarrowia lipolytica and Nce2 (YPR149W) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae as outgroups. Bootstraps values are expressed as percentage of 100 replicates.

Phylogeny of fungal tetraspanins reveals paralogs only in the Tsp2 family

Protein sequences from Pls1, Tsp2 and Tsp3 families were aligned using ClustalX 1.8 [see Additional file 4]. A phylogenetic analysis was then conducted using the PHYML software. The Tpl1 tetraspanin-like family was excluded from this alignment as these proteins are too divergent from Pls1, Tsp2 and Tsp3 proteins to be aligned correctly. The resulting phylogenetic tree (Figure 5) shows that Pls1, Tsp2 and Tsp3 form three distinct families. This phylogenetic tree also shows that the PLS1 genes from ascomycetes and basidiomycetes are orthologs, as the tree is congruent to the corresponding species phylogeny [20]. Similarly, TSP3 genes are orthologs (Figure 5). The TSP2 family consists of numerous paralogs, some being recent as their closest relative gene is in the same species (Tsp2B and Tsp2D from L. bicolor). The Tsp2 cluster is rooted by tetraspanins in the zygomycete, R. oryzae (RO3G_08988/RoTsp2-A and RO3G_17009/RoTsp2-B). The presence of tetraspanins in R. oryzae shows that this family of tetraspanins is ancient and predates the split between zygomycetes and higher fungi.
Figure 5
Figure 5

Phylogenetic tree of fungal Pls1, Tsp2 and Tsp3 tetraspanins. The Pls1, Tsp2 and Tsp3 were aligned using ClustalX 1.8. Aligned sequences were analyzed by maximum likelihood using PHYML and RO3G_14268 and RO3G_02583 from R. oryzae as outgroups [see Additional files 4]. Bootstraps values are expressed as percentage of 100 replicates. Mg: Magnaporthe grisea, Cg: Chaetomium globosum, Cl: Colletotrichum lindemuthianum, Nc: Neurospora crassa, Pa: Podospora anserina, Nh: Nectria haematococca, Gz: Gibberella zeae, Fv: Fusarium verticilloides, Tr: Trichoderma reesei, Sn: Stagonospora nodorum, Lm: Leptosphaeria maculans, Cp: Coccidioides posadasii, Bc: Botrytis cinerea, Ss: Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, An: Aspergillus niger, Lb: Laccaria bicolor, Cc: Coprinus cinereus, Pc: Phanerochete chrisosporium, Cn: Cryptococcus neoformans, Ur:Uncinocarpus reesii.

The number of introns in PLS1 genes varies from one to three in ascomycetes and from three to four in basidiomycetes [see Additional file 2]. One intron position is conserved in all PLS1 genes from ascomycetes (position 403, [see Additional file 2]) except in the related BcPLS1 and SsPLS1 (Leotiomycetes). This intron conservation supports the orthology found between PLS1 genes from ascomycetes. In PLS1 from basidiomycetes, three of the four intron positions are conserved [see Additional file 2] confirming a common origin for these three genes. The number of introns in genes from the TSP2 family varies from zero to four. However closely related TSP2 genes such as CcTSP2A, CcTSP2B, LbTSP2B and LbTSP2D (60% identity at the protein level) that cluster as a single clade in the phylogenetic tree (Figure 5) share the 2 among three introns, suggesting that they result from recent duplications in both C. cinereus and L. bicolor g enomes. In Sordariaceae, TSP3 genes contain three introns [see Additional file 2] except N. crassa which has four, although this may be due to an incorrect exon/intron annotation in the N. crassa gene that could not been corrected since it has no ESTs. Other TSP3 genes have three conserved intron positions (positions 31–52, 60–81 and 565–601, [see Additional file 2]) except in the related BcPLS1 and SsPLS1 (Leotiomycetes), which have an additional specific intron. This conservation of intron number and position supports the orthology between TSP3 genes.

Expression of fungal genes encoding tetraspanins

The expression patterns of PLS1, TSP2, TSP3 and TPL1 were evaluated in different fungal species in silico (absence or presence of ESTs from various libraries, [see Additional file 2]), and by quantitative PCR in M. grisea for MgPLS1, MgTSP3 and MgTPL1 (Figure 6) or by microarrays in L. bicolor for LbPLS1, LbTSP2-A, LbTSP2-B, LbTSP2-C and LbTSP2-D (Figure 7).
Figure 6
Figure 6

Expression profiles of PLS1, TSP3 , TPL1 in different tissues from M. grisea. PLS1, TSP3, TPL1 expressions were quantified by real-time RT-PCR using RNA extracted from mycelia (M), spores (S), 24-h old appressoria (A) from P1.2 wild type strain, perithecia (P) from crosses between P1.2 (MAT1.2) and TH12 (MAT1.1) strains and 3-days old barley leaves infected by P1.2 (I). PLS1, TSP3, TPL1 expressions were calculated relative to the transcripts levels of the constitutively expressed gene ILV5 (MGG_01808.5) according to the formulae: 2-ΔCt = 2-(CtgeneX-CtILV 5). Each data point is the average of three biological replicates. Standard deviation is indicated by error bars. PLS1 is expressed in all tissues whereas TSP3 and TPL1 are expressed in mycelia and perithecia.

Figure 7
Figure 7

Expression profiles of LbPLS1 , LbTSP2-A , LbTSP2-B , LbTSP2-C and LbTSP2-D in different tissues from Laccaria bicolor . LbPLS1 and LbTSP2-A, LbTSP2-B, LbTSP2-C and LbTSP2-D expressions were measured by 60-mer oligoarrays (NimbleGen) using RNA extracted from mycorrhiza, mycelia and fruiting bodies (carpophores). LbPLS1, LbTSP2-A, LbTSP2-B, LbTSP2-C and LbTSP2-D expressions were calculated relative to the transcripts levels of the constitutively expressed gene EIF-5A (LACBI1_192615). Each data point is the mean between values of two biological replicates and a third value corresponding to the mean of two biological replicates. Standard deviation is indicated by error bars. PLS1 is constitutively expressed in all tissues, LbTSP2-A transcripts are barely detectable in comparison to LbTSP2-B, LbTSP2-C and LbTSP2-D transcripts that are expressed in all tissues. LbTSP2-B is strongly expressed in mycorrhiza and mycelia whereas LbTSP2-C and LbTSP2-D are up-expressed in fruiting bodies and in mycorrhiza, respectively.

ESTs corresponding to genes from the PLS1 family were identified [see Additional file 2] in M. grisea (perithecia-sexual fruiting bodies), T. reesei,B. cinerea (mycelia), S. sclerotiorium (mycelia, sclerotia, and apothecia-sexual fruiting bodies), Gibberella moniliformis (mycelia), P. anserina (perithecia-sexual fruiting bodies, germinating ascospores, mycelia),C. cinerea (mycelia, sexual fruiting bodies), P. chrysosporium (tissue undetermined) and L. bicolor (free-living mycelia andmycorrhiza). In all these fungi PLS1 genes are expressed, ruling out the possibility that they correspond to pseudogenes. Indeed PLS1 cDNAs of L. maculans, S. sclerotiorium and C. posadasii were obtained by the screening cDNA libraries. qPCR expression profiling in M. grisea revealed that MgPLS1 mRNAis expressed at similar levels in mycelia and perithecia (0.9 × reference constitutive gene ILV5, Figure 6) and in spores, appressoria and infected barley leaves (0.5 × ILV5, Figure 6). In L. bicolor, PLS1 is constitutively expressed in all tissues analyzed (mycorrhizal symbiotic tissues, mycelia and fruiting bodies, Figure 7).

The expression patterns of the different TSP2 genes in L. bicolor were determined using genome wide long oligonucleotide microarrays (Figure 7). LbTSP2-A shows a barely detectable expression level in contrast to LbTSP2-B, LbTSP2-C and LbTSP2-D, which are expressed in all tissues of L. bicolor. LbTSP2-B is highly expressed in mycorrhiza and mycelia and at a lower level in fruiting bodies. Transcripts corresponding to LbTSP2-C are mainly found in fruiting bodies, whereas LbTSP2-D is over-expressed in mycorrhiza (Figure 7). ESTs corresponding to TSP2 were found in P. chrysosporium, C. neoformans, C. cinerea (mycelia, sexual fruiting bodies) and L. bicolor (mycelia) suggesting that these genes are expressed in the corresponding species.

ESTs corresponding to TSP3 were identified in G. zeae (mycelia, infected wheat heads and perithecia-sexual fruiting bodies), T. reesei (mycelia), Trichoderma harzianum (mycelia), B. cinerea (mycelia), S. sclerotiorium (apothecia-sexual fruiting bodies) and A. niger (mycelia). Quantitative PCR expression profiling in M. grisea showed that MgTSP3 is only weakly expressed in perithecia (0.1 × ILV5) and mycelia (0.05 × ILV5), and negligible in spore and appressoria (Figure 6). Spliced TSP3 transcripts were detected by RT-PCR using mycelial RNA (data not shown) suggesting that TSP3 is indeed expressed in mycelia, although at a very low level.

ESTs for TPL1 were only identified in M. grisea and P. anserina [see Additional file 2]. Quantitative PCR expression profiling in M. grisea revealed that MgTPL1 is over-expressed in perithecia and mycelia (0.4 × ILV5 and 0.3 × ILV5, respectively), but its expression is not detected in spores and appressoria (Figure 6).

Functional analysis of TSP3 and TPL1 in M. grisea

The M. grisea deletion mutants of TSP3 and TPL1 were obtained by targeted gene replacement in a P1.2-Δku80::bar mutant background that increases the frequency of homologous recombination [21]. Fifteen and 11 hygromycin-resistant transformants of TSP3 and TPL1, respectively, were isolated andanalyzed by PCR for the replacement of their wild-type alleles. Deletion mutants were obtained with an efficiency of 100% (15/15) and 82% (9/11) for TSP3 and TPL1, respectively. Their mycelial growth and sporulation rates were similar to those of P1.2-Δku80::bar (reference strain). These mutants were inoculated on detached barley leaves using droplets of conidial suspensions or on barley plants by spraying. Mutants Δtsp3::hyg or Δtpl1::hyg caused foliar lesions identical in number, size and aspect to those induced by the reference strain P1.2-Δku80::bar. The penetration frequencies of thesemutants on barley epidermis were similar to those of wild type, suggesting that TSP3 and TPL1 are not involved in pathogenicity on barley (Figure 8A). This behavior differs from Δpls1 mutant which is non-pathogenic on barley [3]. These mutants were spray-inoculated on two different rice cultivars compatible with M. grisea isolate P1.2, Azucena (O. sativa japonica) with an intermediate level of partial resistance to M. grisea and CO-39 (O. sativa indica) that is more susceptible to M. grisea than Azucena. Quantitative analysis of leaf blast infection revealed that the pathogenicity of Δtsp3::hyg and Δtpl1::hyg deletion mutants is significantly reduced on both cultivars. On cv. Azucena, the Δtsp3::hyg and Δtpl1::hyg mutants produced respectively less than 30% (z = 5, P = 0) and 35% (z = 4.6, P = 2.3 × 10-6) of the number of foliar lesions induced by the P1.2-Δku80::bar reference strain (Figure 8B). On cv. CO-39, the Δtsp3::hyg and Δtpl1::hyg mutants produced respectively less than 55% (t = 3.2, P = 1.2 × 10-3) and 40% (z = 4.3, P = 8.6 × 10-6), respectively, of the number of foliar lesions produced by the P1.2-Δku80::bar strain (Figure 8B).
Figure 8
Figure 8

Pathogenicity of Δtsp3 and Δtpl1 deletion mutants from M. grisea. (A) Pathogenicity on barley. Barley cv. Plaisant leaves were inoculated with droplets of conidial suspension (3 × 104 conidia/ml) from pathogenic P1.2-Δku80::bar (+) and Δku80::bar/Δtsp3 and Δku80::bar/Δtpl1 mutants. Leaves were kept on water agar for 7 days under alternate day/night at 26°C and scored. Typical symptoms induced by M. grisea are visible as pale green ellipsoid lesions surrounded by a yellow halo for wild type as well as tetraspanin mutants showing that Δtsp3 and Δtpl1 mutants are still pathogenic on barley. (B) Pathogenicity on rice. Seedlings of rice cultivars Azucena and CO-39 were sprayed with conidial suspensions (2.5 × 104 conidia/ml) from pathogenic P1.2-Δku80::bar (+) and Δku80::bar/Δtsp3 and Δku80::bar/Δtpl1 mutants. Seedlings were incubated for 7 days under alternate day/night at 25°C for development of disease. The deletion mutants Δku80::bar/Δtsp3 and Δku80::bar/Δtpl1 produced significantly fewer disease lesions than P1.2-Δku80::bar (reference strain).

The up-regulation of TSP3 and TPL1 in perithecia suggested involvement of these genes in mating. To address this question, the differentiation of perithecia and ascospores was examined in crosses between wild-type TH12 isolate and Δtsp3::hyg or Δtpl1::hyg mutants. A cross between the P1.2-Δku80::bar mutant (phenotypically similar to the wild-type P12 isolate) and wild-type TH12 isolate was used as control. Production of perithecia was monitored and three weeks after mating and those ascospores were observed and then allowed to germinate. No significant differences were observed in the fertility in crosses between Δtsp3::hyg, Δtpl1::hyg and wild type M. grisea strains, indicating that these genes are not essential for sexual reproduction.

Discussion

We have performed an exhaustive search for tetraspanins in fungal genomes. In addition to expanding the previously described Pls1 [11] and Tsp2 tetraspanin families [2], we have identified a new tetraspanin family (Tsp3) and a tetraspanin-like family (Tpl1). These gene families display a different evolutionary history. An ancestral tetraspanin family specific to zygomycetes (RO3G_02583 and RO3G_14268 used as roots of the tree; Figure 5) appears to be lost in higher fungi (basidiomycetes and ascomycetes). The identification of a Tsp2 tetraspanin in the zygomycete Rhizopus oryzae (RO3G_08988/RoTsp2-A and RO3G_17009/RoTsp2-B) shows that this family is ancient and predates the divergence between this phylum and higher fungi. Pls1-encoding genes were identified in almost all ascomycete and basidiomycete species. Their absence in zygomycetes suggests that the Pls1 family is more recent than the Tsp2 one (Figure 5). The Tsp3 and Tpl1 families are restricted to ascomycetes suggesting a more recent origin than the Pls1 and Tsp2 families. The absence of tetraspanins in all hemiascomycete species suggests that these genes were lost early after the divergence of these fungi from the other ascomycetes. In the Aspergilli, the unique tetraspanin identified belongs to the Tsp3 family. Interestingly no tetraspanin genes were found in the basidiomycete, U. maydis.

The Pls1 family is highly conserved in higher fungi and is present as a single copy in each genome, defining a family of orthologous genes. In phytopathogenic fungi, Pls1 is essential for infection and is required for appressorium-mediated penetration into host plant in three species (M. grisea, B. cinerea,C. lindemuthianum). The corresponding null mutants have appressoria that are unable to form functional penetration pegs that direct the penetration of the fungus into host plant [3, 13, 14]. These results support the hypothesis that Pls1 tetraspanins are involved in a conserved cellular function essential for appressorium function. However, the existence of Pls1 in the human ascomycete pathogen Coccidioides posadasii, in saprotrophic fungiand in symbiotic basidiomycetes such as ectomycorrhiza suggests that Pls1 plays other cellular roles than appressorium-mediated penetration of host tissues since these fungi do not differentiate appressoria. At present, these functions of Pls1 remain unknown. In fungi, functional studies are just beginning to be applied to discover such functions. Furthermore, the presence of a single copy of PLS1 in these fungal genomes offers an advantage in deciphering its cellular functions, compared to animals that have numerous tetraspanins with possible functional redundancy [6].

The Tsp2 tetraspanins are highly conserved suggesting an important functional role in most basidiomycetes although it is curious that the Ustilago maydis genome does not contain tetraspanins. Interestingly, this Tsp2 family is multigenic in L. bicolor and C. cinerea, which contrasts with other fungal tetraspanins families. Indeed, L. bicolor displays four Tsp2 paralogs and C. cinerea contains three Tsp2 paralogs. The functional significance of this multigene family is unknown. The finding in L. bicolor that LbTSP2B, LbTSP2C and LbTSP2D were expressed in all analyzed tissues suggests that corresponding proteins could be involved in the formation of a tetraspanin web, as described in animals [6]. However, differential expression profiles were observed; LbTSP2B is over-expressed in mycelia, LbTSP2C is over-expressed in fruiting bodies and LbTSP2D is over-expressed in mycorrhiza. This tissue specific expression of Tsp2 tetraspanins may explain the redundancy of this family.

Although TSP3 and TPL1 are over-expressed in perithecia, no particular phenotype was observed in perithecia when either of these genes was mutated. Perithecial production after mating and ascospore germination were identical to the wild type strain. No significant differences in the fertility were observed in crosses between Δtsp3::hyg, Δtpl1::hyg and wild type M. grisea strains. In animals, analysis of mutants with deleted tetraspanins showed no effect on development, but often had slightly altered phenotypes. For example, deletions of murine tetraspanin genes led to a mild alteration of lymphocyte proliferation and motility [6]. Even, in the Drosophilae the deletion of about 25% of all tetraspanins does not affect viability or fertility and results only in a transient defect in neuromuscular innervation during the larval stage [22]. M. grisea may not be an appropriate model to characterize sexual reproduction and anastomosis. Therefore, it would be interesting to investigate the role of the TSP3 and TPL1 genes in other 'model' fungi such as N. crassa or P. anserina, which have large sexual fruiting bodies and higher reproduction frequency, and thus may be more suitable to analyze subtle phenotypes.

In M. grisea, the Δtsp3 and Δtpl1 mutants showed a significant reduction in pathogenicity only on rice. The rice cultivars used in this study are generally more resistant to M. grisea compared to the barley cultivars. Thus, barley may not be resistant enough to reveal differences in pathogenicity between the Δtsp3 and Δtpl1 mutants and a wild type strain. Our findings show that TSP3 and TPL1 are involved in the pathogenicity of M. grisea but have only a quantitative effect on pathogenicity, in contrast to the loss of pathogenicity caused by deletion of PLS1.

Conclusion

Higher fungi contain three canonical tetraspanin families: the Pls1 family identified in ascomycetes and basidiomycetes, the Tsp2 family specific to basidiomycetes and the Tsp3 family restricted to ascomycetes. Paralogs were only identified within the Tsp2 family in the basidiomycetes C. cinereus and L. bicolor. A tetraspanin-like family (Tpl1) was also identified although only in ascomycetes. Our results demonstrate that the deletion of TSP3 and TPL1 reduced the pathogenicity of M. grisea on rice. At present, functional studies of fungal tetraspanins are limited to phytopathogenic fungi producing appressoria. The function(s) of tetraspanin remain(s) unknown in saprophytic fungi, basidiomycetes and human pathogenic fungi. Future functional study of tetraspanins in these fungi may highlight other cellular roles than in appressorium-mediated penetration in host plants. Finally, the role of tetraspanin-like proteins in fungi needs to be investigated in more depth. For example, the possibility of functional interactions with canonical tetraspanins should be assessed as observed in animals [23].

Methods

Bioinformatic analyses

Fungal proteins related to tetraspanins were identified using the PF00335 motif [24] and HMMER package [25, 26]) to search fungal protein databases available at [27–31]. ESTs were searched by Blastn of the corresponding tetraspanin encoding genes against public databases available at NCBI [29], COGEME [32], Broad Institute [27] or private EST databases (P. Silar, IGM, Orsay, France for Podospora anserina; Laccaria bicolor database [33]; and Bayer CropScience for Botrytis cinerea).

cDNA libraries

The PLS1 cDNA from S. sclerotiorum (isolate UQ1280-1) was amplified by PCR using the degenerate primers T1b and T3b [11] from appressorial cDNA prepared as described by [34] and RACE (5' and 3') allowed the sequence of full length transcripts to be acquired. The complete sequence of PLS1 from L. maculans was derived from a partial EST (DT932772) and by 5' and 3' RACE. The RACE libraries (Invitrogen GeneRacer kit, CA) were constructed using RNA extracted from mycelia grown for four days on vegetable juice medium (10% Campbell's V8 juice, pH 6) in shaking cultures. To identify introns and UTRs in the tetraspanin-encoding genes, BLAST2SEQ [29] and ClustalW were used to align the genomic sequence of each tetraspanin locus with available ESTs. The PLS1 cDNAs of C. posadasii were isolated by RT-PCR using total RNA from mycelium of strain Silveira as a template. Oligos OAM770 (CGTGACATACCGCTGAATTG) and OAM772 (TATTTGGAATCAACCGCCTC) were used to amplify the cDNA, which was cloned into pGEM®-T Easy (Promega) and sequenced. RT-PCR analysis of the CpPLS1 gene using RNA isolated from in vitro grown parasitic phase spherules indicated that it was expressed at all stages of spherulation, as well as during the mycelial phase of the fungus. The various genes and their corresponding proteins are listed in [Additional file 5] and [Additional file 6].

Transmembrane helices were predicted using the TMHMM2.0 server [35, 36]. The presence of the CCG-X-C- X-C motif was sought in the large extracellular loop (ECL2) of each protein. Protein sequences were aligned with ClustalX 1.8 [37] and transferred to GenDoc for visualization [38]. Phylogenetic trees were constructed from these alignments using the maximum likelihood method and the PHYML software [39, 40] and transferred to Mega3.1 for visualization [41]. Bootstrap values were expressed as percentage of 100 replicates.

Fungal strains, growth conditions and Δtsp3::hyg and Δtpl1::hyg deletion mutants

Media composition, maintenance of M. grisea cultures, transformation, and sexual crosses were as described by [42, 43]. M. grisea P1.2 and TH12 strains have been previously described [3, 44], as has the P1.2-Δku80 strain [21]. Appressoria were differentiated on Teflon membranes (FP301050 Goodfellow, Cambridge, U.K.). The Δtsp3 and Δtpl1 mutants were constructed by targeted gene replacement of ORFs by a hygromycin resistance cassette as described in [21]. The primers used in all experiments are listed in [Additional file 7].

Microarray experiments in Laccaria bicolor

The Laccaria whole-genome expression array manufactured by NimbleGen (Madison, WI) contains in duplicates eight independent, non-identical, 60-mer probes per whole gene model. Included in the microarray are 20, 614 annotated gene models (genome sequence v1.0), 1, 680 additional predicted gene models, 30, 000 random 60-mer control probes and labeling controls. A manuscript fully describing the array is in preparation. Free-living mycelium of L. bicolor S238N was grown onto cellophane-covered agar plates containing Pachlewski medium, and was grown for three weeks before harvesting the proliferating hyphal tips at the periphery. Ectomycorrhizas of L. bicolor/Douglas fir and L. bicolor/Poplar were synthesized in greenhouse experiments. In addition, ectomycorrhizas of L. bicolor/Poplar were synthesized using an in vitro system. Fruiting bodies of L. bicolor S238N were collected below Douglas fir seedlings grown in a greenhouse and inoculated using L. bicolor S238N. Tissues were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and RNA extraction was carried out using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). Total RNA preparations (two biological replicates for each sample) were amplified using the SMART PCR cDNA Synthesis Kit (Clontech) according to the manufacterer's instructions. Single dye labeling of samples, hybridization procedures, data acquisition, background correction and normalization were performed at the NimbleGen facility (NimbleGen Systems, Reykjavik, Iceland) following their standard protocol. Average expression levels were calculated for each gene from the independent probes on the array and were used for further analysis. The complete expression dataset is available as series GSE9784 at the Gene Expression Omnibus at NCBI [45].

Expression profiling by real-time quantitative PCR

Total RNA was extracted from M. grisea mycelia, conidia, mature appressoria (24 h), perithecia and infected barley leaves using the hot acid/phenol protocol [46]. Mycelia were derived from cultures grown in complete liquid medium. Conidia from P1.2 strain were obtained on agar rice medium. To differentiate appressoria, a conidial suspension (3.105 conidia/mL) supplemented with 10 μM 1,13-hexadecendiol was placed on Teflon membranes (FP301050 Goodfellow, Cambridge, U.K.) and incubated for 24 h at 26°C. Perithecia were obtained by crossing M. grisea strains P1.2 and TH12. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCR) were performed with 5 μg total RNA using the ThermoScript™ RT-PCR system kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer' s instructions. Real-time PCR experiments were performed in 96-well plates using ABI-7900 (Applied Biosystems, USA). Primer pairs were designed using Primer Express software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) with standard parameters (optimal melting point, 58°C; optimal primer length, 20 bp; amplicon length, 101 bp). cDNA dilutions of 10-3 and 10-2 were used respectively for cDNA obtained from fungal tissues (mycelia, conidia, appressoria, and perithecia) and infected barley leaves. Standard conditions were used with SYBR green PCR Master mix (Applied Biosystem, 95°C for 10 min and 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 60°C for 1 min and 72°C for 30 s). Gene expression was calculated relative to the transcripts levels of the constitutively expressed gene ILV5 (MGG_01808.5) using the formulae 2-ΔCt = 2-(Ctgene-CtILV 5). The accession numbers of fungal tetraspanins are indicated in [Additional file 5] and the real-time PCR primers are listed in [Additional file 7].

Phenotypic analysis

Pathogenicity assays were performed using susceptible barley cultivar Plaisant (Hordeum vulgare L.) and the susceptible rice cultivars Maratelli, LS1, Azucena and CO-39 (Oriza sativa). Conidia harvested from 10–14 day old cultures of M. grisea growing on rice agar were inoculated on barley or rice plants. Barley seedlings were cultivated at 15°C with 60% humidity for 2–3 weeks. Segments (3 cm long) from the barley leaves were placed on water agar (1%) containing kinetin (2 mg.L-1), inoculated with 50 μL droplets of spore suspension (3 × 104 spores.mL-1) and incubated at 26°C under a photoperiod of 12 hours light. Leaf symptoms were recorded 7 days after inoculation. Rice seedlings were cultivated for 20–30 days at 70% relative humidity and 25°C day/20°C night in a growth chamber. Barley or rice (five and 160 plants per pot or tray, respectively) were sprayed with spore suspensions (20 mL of 3 × 104and 2.5 × 104 spores.mL-1, respectively) containing 0.5% gelatin (w/v). Inoculated rice plants were grown at 100% humidity for 24 h at 20–22°C in the dark and subsequently transferred to a greenhouse at 23°C. Leaf symptoms were recorded 7 days after inoculation. Quantitative analysis of leaf blast infection was carried on 30 leaves in two biological replicates. Mean number of lesions per leaves were recorded. Statistical analyses were carried out with Statbox Pro 6.5 (Grimmersoft, Paris, France; Student and Mann-Whitney tests, threshold alpha/2 = 0,025). The M. grisea penetration assays into barley epidermal cells were performed as described in [3].

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Dominique Job for critical reading of the manuscript, Philippe Silar for providing Podospora anserina ESTs. We also thank Joëlle Milazzo for her excellent technical assistance. Karine Lambou was supported by a fellowship from Bayer CropScience (Lyon, France).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
UMR 5240 CNRS-UCB-INSA-Bayer CropScience, Microbiologie, Adaptation et Pathogénie, Bayer CropScience, Lyon Cedex 09, France
(2)
UMR BGPI, CIRAD-INRA-SupAgro.M, TA A 54/K, Montpellier Cedex 5, France
(3)
UMR INRA/Université Henri Poincaré 1136, Interactions Arbres/Micro-organismes, Centre INRA de Nancy, Champenoux, France
(4)
Bayer CropScience AG, Monheim am Rhein, Germany
(5)
School of Botany, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
(6)
University of Arizona, Tucson, USA

References

  1. Hemler ME: Tetraspanin functions and associated microdomains. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005, 6 (10): 801-811. 10.1038/nrm1736.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Huang S, Yuan S, Dong M, Su J, Yu C, Shen Y, Xie X, Yu Y, Yu X, Chen S, et al: The phylogenetic analysis of tetraspanins projects the evolution of cell-cell interactions from unicellular to multicellular organisms. Genomics. 2005, 86 (6): 674-684. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2005.08.004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Clergeot PH, Gourgues M, Cots J, Laurans F, Latorse MP, Pepin R, Tharreau D, Notteghem JL, Lebrun MH: PLS1, a gene encoding a tetraspanin-like protein, is required for penetration of rice leaf by the fungal pathogen Magnaporthe grisea. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98 (12): 6963-6968. 10.1073/pnas.111132998.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Cnops G, Neyt P, Raes J, Petrarulo M, Nelissen H, Malenica N, Luschnig C, Tietz O, Ditengou F, Palme K, et al: The TORNADO1 and TORNADO2 genes function in several patterning processes during early leaf development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2006, 18 (4): 852-866. 10.1105/tpc.105.040568.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Olmos E, Reiss B, Dekker K: The ekeko mutant demonstrates a role for tetraspanin-like protein in plant development. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003, 310 (4): 1054-1061. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.09.122.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Levy S, Shoham T: The tetraspanin web modulates immune-signalling complexes. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005, 5 (2): 136-148. 10.1038/nri1548.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Boucheix C, Rubinstein E: Tetraspanins. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2001, 58 (9): 1189-1205. 10.1007/PL00000933.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Berditchevski F, Odintsova E: Tetraspanins as regulators of protein trafficking. Traffic. 2007, 8 (2): 89-96. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2006.00515.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Seigneuret M, Delaguillaumie A, Lagaudriere-Gesbert C, Conjeaud H: Structure of the tetraspanin main extracellular domain. A partially conserved fold with a structurally variable domain insertion. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276 (43): 40055-40064. 10.1074/jbc.M105557200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Stipp CS, Kolesnikova TV, Hemler ME: Functional domains in tetraspanin proteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 2003, 28 (2): 106-112. 10.1016/S0968-0004(02)00014-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Gourgues M, Clergeot PH, Veneault C, Cots J, Sibuet S, Brunet-Simon A, Levis C, Langin T, Lebrun MH: A new class of tetraspanins in fungi. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002, 297 (5): 1197-1204. 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)02355-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Veneault-Fourrey C, Lambou K, Lebrun MH: Fungal Pls1 tetraspanins as key factors of penetration into host plants: a role in re-establishing polarized growth in the appressorium?. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006, 256 (2): 179-184. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00128.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Gourgues M, Brunet-Simon A, Lebrun MH, Levis C: The tetraspanin BcPls1 is required for appressorium-mediated penetration of Botrytis cinerea into host plant leaves. Mol Microbiol. 2004, 51 (3): 619-629. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03866.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Veneault-Fourrey C, Parisot D, Gourgues M, Lauge R, Lebrun M-H, Langin T: The tetraspanin gene ClPLS1 is essential for appressorium-mediated penetration of the fungal pathogen Colletotrichum lindemuthianum. Fungal Genetics and Biology. 2005, 42 (4): 306-318.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Berditchevski F, Odintsova E, Sawada S, Gilbert E: Expression of the palmitoylation-deficient CD151 weakens the association of alpha 3 beta 1 integrin with the tetraspanin-enriched microdomains and affects integrin-dependent signaling. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277 (40): 36991-37000. 10.1074/jbc.M205265200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Charrin S, Manie S, Oualid M, Billard M, Boucheix C, Rubinstein E: Differential stability of tetraspanin/tetraspanin interactions: role of palmitoylation. FEBS Lett. 2002, 516 (1–3): 139-144. 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)02522-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Yang X, Claas C, Kraeft SK, Chen LB, Wang Z, Kreidberg JA, Hemler ME: Palmitoylation of tetraspanin proteins: modulation of CD151 lateral interactions, subcellular distribution, and integrin-dependent cell morphology. Mol Biol Cell. 2002, 13 (3): 767-781. 10.1091/mbc.01-05-0275.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhang XA, Bontrager AL, Hemler ME: Transmembrane-4 superfamily proteins associate with activated protein kinase C (PKC) and link PKC to specific beta(1) integrins. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276 (27): 25005-25013. 10.1074/jbc.M102156200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Rous BA, Reaves BJ, Ihrke G, Briggs JA, Gray SR, Stephens DJ, Banting G, Luzio JP: Role of adaptor complex AP-3 in targeting wild-type and mutated CD63 to lysosomes. Mol Biol Cell. 2002, 13 (3): 1071-1082. 10.1091/mbc.01-08-0409.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Fitzpatrick DA, Logue ME, Stajich JE, Butler G: A fungal phylogeny based on 42 complete genomes derived from supertree and combined gene analysis. BMC Evol Biol. 2006, 6: 99-10.1186/1471-2148-6-99.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Villalba F, Collemare J, Landraud P, Lambou K, Brozek V, Cirer B, Morin D, Bruel C, Beffa R, Lebrun MH: Improved gene targeting in Magnaporthe grisea by inactivation of MgKU80 required for non-homologous end joining. Fungal Genet Biol. 2007Google Scholar
  22. Fradkin LG, Kamphorst JT, DiAntonio A, Goodman CS, Noordermeer JN: Genomewide analysis of the Drosophila tetraspanins reveals a subset with similar function in the formation of the embryonic synapse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99 (21): 13663-13668. 10.1073/pnas.212511099.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Kovalenko OV, Yang XH, Hemler ME: A novel cysteine crosslinking method reveals a direct association between claudin-1 and tetraspanin CD9. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2007Google Scholar
  24. Pfam. [http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Software/Pfam/]
  25. HMMER software. [http://hmmer.janelia.org/]
  26. Eddy SR: Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics. 1998, 14 (9): 755-763. 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.755.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Fungal Genome Initiative. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. [http://www.broad.mit.edu./annotation/fgi/]
  28. Joint Genome Institute. [http://genome.jgi-psf.org/]
  29. NCBI. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/]
  30. Podospora anserina Genome Project. [http://podospora.igmors.u-psud.fr/]
  31. Fungal Genome projects. TIGR. [http://www.tigr.org/tdb/fungal/index.shtml]
  32. Phytopathogenic Fungi and Oomycete EST Database. Consortium for Genomics of Microbial Eukaryotes (COGEME). [http://cogeme.ex.ac.uk]
  33. MycorWeb. [http://mycor.nancy.inra.fr/IMGC/LaccariaGenome/]
  34. Sexton AC, Cozijnsen AJ, Keniry A, Jewell E, Love CG, Batley J, Edwards D, Howlett BJ: Comparison of transcription of multiple genes at three developmental stages of the plant pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006, 258 (1): 150-160. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00212.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. TMHMM Server v. 2.0. Prediction of transmembrane helices in proteins. [http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM-2.0/]
  36. Sonnhammer EL, von Heijne G, Krogh A: A hidden Markov model for predicting transmembrane helices in protein sequences. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol. 1998, 6: 175-182.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG: The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25 (24): 4876-4882. 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Nicholas KB, Nicholas HB, Deerfield DW: GeneDoc: analysis and visualization of genetic variation. Embnet News. 1997, 4: 1-4.Google Scholar
  39. Guindon S, Gascuel O: A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 2003, 52 (5): 696-704. 10.1080/10635150390235520.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Guindon S, Lethiec F, Duroux P, Gascuel O: PHYML Online–a web server for fast maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic inference. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, W557-559. 10.1093/nar/gki352. 33 Web ServerGoogle Scholar
  41. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M: MEGA3: Integrated software for Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform. 2004, 5 (2): 150-163. 10.1093/bib/5.2.150.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Daboussi MJ, Djeballi A, Gerlinger C, Blaiseau PL, Bouvier I, Cassan M, Lebrun MH, Parisot D, Brygoo Y: Transformation of seven species of filamentous fungi using the nitrate reductase gene of Aspergillus nidulans. Curr Genet. 1989, 15 (6): 453-456. 10.1007/BF00376803.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Silué D, Tharreau D, Talbot NJ, Clergeot PH, Notteghem JL, Lebrun MH: Identification and characterization of apf1- in a non-pathogenic mutant of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea which is unable to differentiate appressoria. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology. 1998, 53 (4): 239-251. 10.1006/pmpp.1998.0180.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Hemmati R, Javan-Nikkhahi M, Hedjaroude GA, Okhovvat SM, Moosanejad S: Fertility status and distribution of mating type alleles of the rice blast fungus, Magnaporthe grisea in northern Iran. Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2004, 69 (4): 537-539.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/]
  46. Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, Struhl K: Short Protocols in Molecular Biology. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Greene & Wiley, New York). 1994Google Scholar

Copyright

© Lambou et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us