Reed DH, Frankham R. Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv Biol. 2003;17:230–7.
Article
Google Scholar
Agudo R, Carrete M, Alcaide M, Rico C, Hiraldo F, Donázar JA. Genetic diversity at neutral and adaptive loci determines individual fitness in a long-lived territorial bird. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2012;279:3241–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Selkoe KA, Toonen RJ. Microsatellites for ecologists: a practical guide to using and evaluating microsatellite markers. Ecol Lett. 2006;9:615–29.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tautz D, Renz M. Simple sequences are ubiquitous repetitive components of eukaryotic genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984;12:4127–38.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Funk WC, McKay JK, Hohenlohe PA, Allendorf FW. Harnessing genomics for delineating conservation units. Trends Ecol Evol. 2012;27:489–96.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ouborg NJ, Pertoldi C, Loeschcke V, Bijlsma R, Hedrick PW. Conservation genetics in transition to conservation genomics. Trends Genet. 2010;26:177–87.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Guichoux E, Lagache L, Wagner S, Chaumeil P, LÉGer P, Lepais O, Lepoittevin C, Malausa T, Revardel E, Salin F, et al. Current trends in microsatellite genotyping. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011;11:591–611.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Putman AI, Carbone I. Challenges in analysis and interpretation of microsatellite data for population genetic studies. Ecol Evol. 2014;4:4399–428.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hoffman JI, Simpson F, David P, Rijks JM, Kuiken T, Thorne MAS, Lacy RC, Dasmahapatra KK. High-throughput sequencing reveals inbreeding depression in a natural population. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(10):3775–80.
Väli U, Einarsson A, Waits L, Ellegren H. To what extent do microsatellite markers reflect genome-wide genetic diversity in natural populations? Mol Ecol. 2008;17:3808–17.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Glover K, Hansen M, Lien S, Als T, Hoyheim B, Skaala O. A comparison of SNP and STR loci for delineating population structure and performing individual genetic assignment. BMC Genet. 2010;11:2.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
CAS
Google Scholar
Gärke C, Ytournel F, Bed’hom B, Gut I, Lathrop M, Weigend S, Simianer H. Comparison of SNPs and microsatellites for assessing the genetic structure of chicken populations. Anim Genet. 2012;43:419–28.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1977;74:5463–7.
Helyar SJ, Hemmer-Hansen J, Bekkevold D, Taylor MI, Ogden R, Limborg MT, Cariani A, Maes GE, Diopere E, Carvalho GR, et al. Application of SNPs for population genetics of nonmodel organisms: new opportunities and challenges. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011;11:123–36.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Haasl RJ, Payseur BA. Multi-locus inference of population structure: a comparison between single nucleotide polymorphisms and microsatellites. Heredity. 2011;106:158–71.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Liu N, Chen L, Wang S, Oh C, Zhao H. Comparison of single-nucleotide polymorphisms and microsatellites in inference of population structure. BMC Genet. 2005;6 Suppl 1:S26.
Article
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Morin PA, Luikart G, Wayne RK, the SNPwg. SNPs in ecology, evolution and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2004;19:208–16.
Article
Google Scholar
Metzker ML. Sequencing technologies — the next generation. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:31–46.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Davey JW, Hohenlohe PA, Etter PD, Boone JQ, Catchen JM, Blaxter ML. Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12:499–510.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Schlötterer C, Tobler R, Kofler R, Nolte V. Sequencing pools of individuals - mining genome-wide polymorphism data without big funding. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15:749–63.
Article
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Ellegren H. Microsatellites: simple sequences with complex evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5:435–45.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kelkar YD, Strubczewski N, Hile SE, Chiaromonte F, Eckert KA, Makova KD. What is a microsatellite: a computational and experimental definition based upon repeat mutational behavior at A/T and GT/AC repeats. Genome Biol Evol. 2010;2:620–35.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
CAS
Google Scholar
Ellegren H. Microsatellite mutations in the germline: implications for evolutionary inference. Trends Genet. 2000;16:551–8.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bhargava A, Fuentes FF. Mutational dynamics of microsatellites. Mol Biotechnol. 2010;44:250–66.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Leffler EM, Bullaughey K, Matute DR, Meyer WK, Ségurel L, Venkat A, Andolfatto P, Przeworski M. Revisiting an old riddle: what determines genetic diversity levels within species? PLoS Biol. 2012;10:e1001388.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ossowski S, Schneeberger K, Lucas-Lledó JI, Warthmann N, Clark RM, Shaw RG, Weigel D, Lynch M. The rate and molecular spectrum of spontaneous mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science. 2010;327:92–4.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Queirós J, Godinho R, Lopes S, Gortazar C, de la Fuente J, Alves PC. Effect of microsatellite selection on individual and population genetic inferences: an empirical study using cross-specific and species-specific amplifications. Mol Ecol Resour. 2015;15:747–60.
Article
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Chapuis M-P, Estoup A. Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:621–31.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Estoup A, Jarne P, Cornuet J-M. Homoplasy and mutation model at microsatellite loci and their consequences for population genetics analysis. Mol Ecol. 2002;11:1591–604.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Balloux F, Lugon-Moulin N. The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers. Mol Ecol. 2002;11:155–65.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Willi Y, Van Buskirk J, Hoffmann AA. Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2006;37:433–58.
Article
Google Scholar
Allendorf FW, Hohenlohe PA, Luikart G. Genomics and the future of conservation genetics. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:697–709.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Johnson WE, Onorato DP, Roelke ME, Land ED, Cunningham M, Belden RC, McBride R, Jansen D, Lotz M, Shindle D, et al. Genetic restoration of the Florida panther. Science. 2010;329:1641–5.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Pimm SL, Dollar L, Bass OL. The genetic rescue of the Florida panther. Anim Conserv. 2006;9:115–22.
Article
Google Scholar
Brandt AL, Hagos Y, Yacob Y, David VA, Georgiadis NJ, Shoshani J, Roca AL. The elephants of Gash-Barka, Eritrea: nuclear and mitochondrial genetic patterns. J Hered. 2014;105:82–90.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ryynänen HJ, Tonteri A, Vasemägi A, Primmer CR. A comparison of biallelic markers and microsatellites for the estimation of population and conservation genetic parameters in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). J Hered. 2007;98:692–704.
Article
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Ozerov M, Vasemägi A, Wennevik V, Diaz-Fernandez R, Kent M, Gilbey J, Prusov S, Niemelä E, Vähä J-P. Finding markers that make a difference: DNA pooling and SNP-arrays identify population informative markers for genetic stock identification. PLoS One. 2013;8:e82434.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
CAS
Google Scholar
Ciani E, Cecchi F, Castellana E, D’Andrea M, Incoronato C, D’Angelo F, Albenzio M, Pilla F, Matassino D, Cianci D, et al. Poorer resolution of low-density SNP vs. STR markers in reconstructing genetic relationships among seven Italian sheep breeds. Large Anim Rev. 2013;19:236–41.
Google Scholar
Singh N, Choudhury DR, Singh AK, Kumar S, Srinivasan K, Tyagi RK, Singh NK, Singh R. Comparison of SSR and SNP markers in estimation of genetic diversity and population structure of Indian rice varieties. PLoS One. 2013;8:e84136.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
CAS
Google Scholar
Fernández ME, Goszczynski DE, Lirón JP, Villegas-Castagnasso EE, Carino MH, Ripoli MV, Rogberg-Muñoz A, Posik DM, Peral-García P, Giovambattista G. Comparison of the effectiveness of microsatellites and SNP panels for genetic identification, traceability and assessment of parentage in an inbred Angus herd. Genet Mol Biol. 2013;36:185–91.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Herráeza DL, Schäfer H, Mosner J, Fries H-R, Wink M. Comparison of microsatellite and single nucleotide polymorphism markers for the genetic analysis of a Galloway cattle population. Z Naturforsch C. 2005;60:637–43.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Coates BS, Sumerford DV, Miller NJ, Kim KS, Sappington TW, Siegfried BD, Lewis LC. Comparative performance of single nucleotide polymorphism and microsatellite markers for population genetic analysis. J Hered. 2009;100:556–64.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Livingstone III D, Motamayor J, Schnell R, Cariaga K, Freeman B, Meerow A, Brown JS, Kuhn D. Development of single nucleotide polymorphism markers in Theobroma cacao and comparison to simple sequence repeat markers for genotyping of Cameroon clones. Mol Breeding. 2011;27:93–106.
Article
Google Scholar
Granevitze Z, David L, Twito T, Weigend S, Feldman M, Hillel J. Phylogenetic resolution power of microsatellites and various single-nucleotide polymorphism types assessed in 10 divergent chicken populations. Anim Genet. 2014;45:87–95.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ross CT, Weise JA, Bonnar S, Nolin D, Satkoski Trask J, Smith DG, Ferguson B, Ha J, Kubisch HM, Vinson A, et al. An empirical comparison of short tandem repeats (STRs) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for relatedness estimation in Chinese rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Am J Primatol. 2014;76:313–24.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
DeFaveri J, Viitaniemi H, Leder E, Merilä J. Characterizing genic and nongenic molecular markers: comparison of microsatellites and SNPs. Mol Ecol Resour. 2013;13:377–92.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Miller JM, Malenfant RM, David P, Davis CS, Poissant J, Hogg JT, Festa-Bianchet M, Coltman DW. Estimating genome-wide heterozygosity: effects of demographic history and marker type. Heredity. 2014;112:240–7.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lozier JD. Revisiting comparisons of genetic diversity in stable and declining species: assessing genome-wide polymorphism in North American bumble bees using RAD sequencing. Mol Ecol. 2014;23:788–801.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Vilas A, Pérez-Figueroa A, Quesada H, Caballero A. Allelic diversity for neutral markers retains a higher adaptive potential for quantitative traits than expected heterozygosity. Mol Ecol. 2015;24:4419–32.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Fischer MC, Rellstab C, Tedder A, Zoller S, Gugerli F, Shimizu KK, Holderegger R, Widmer A. Population genomic footprints of selection and associations with climate in natural populations of Arabidopsis halleri from the Alps. Mol Ecol. 2013;22:5594–607.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Rellstab C, Zoller S, Tedder A, Gugerli F, Fischer MC. Validation of SNP allele frequencies determined by pooled next-generation sequencing in natural populations of a non-model plant species. PLoS One. 2013;8:e80422.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Llaurens V, Castric V, Austerlitz F, Vekemans X. High paternal diversity in the self-incompatible herb Arabidopsis halleri despite clonal reproduction and spatially restricted pollen dispersal. Mol Ecol. 2008;17:1577–88.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Pauwels M, Vekemans X, Godé C, Frérot H, Castric V, Saumitou-Laprade P. Nuclear and chloroplast DNA phylogeography reveals vicariance among European populations of the model species for the study of metal tolerance, Arabidopsis halleri (Brassicaceae). New Phytol. 2012;193:916–28.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Al-Shehbaz IA, O’Kane SL. Taxonomy and phylogeny of Arabidopsis (Brassicaceae). In: Somerville CR, Meyerowitz EM, editors. The Arabidopsis Book. Rockville: American Society of Plant Biologist; 2002. p. 1–22.
Google Scholar
Clauss MJ, Koch M. Poorly known relatives of Arabidopsis thaliana. Trends Plant Sci. 2006;11:449–59.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Meyer C-L, Kostecka AA, Saumitou-Laprade P, Créach A, Castric V, Pauwels M, Frérot H. Variability of zinc tolerance among and within populations of the pseudometallophyte species Arabidopsis halleri and possible role of directional selection. New Phytol. 2010;185:130–42.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Johnston JS, Pepper AE, Hall AE, Chen ZJ, Hodnett G, Drabek J, Lopez R, Price HJ. Evolution of genome size in Brassicaceae. Ann Bot. 2005;95:229–35.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hale ML, Burg TM, Steeves TE. Sampling for microsatellite-based population genetic studies: 25 to 30 individuals per population is enough to accurately estimate allele frequencies. PLoS One. 2012;7:e45170.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Van Rossum F, Bonnin I, Fenart S, Pauwels M, Petit D, Saumitou-Laprade P. Spatial genetic structure within a metallicolous population of Arabidopsis halleri, a clonal, self-incompatible and heavy-metal-tolerant species. Mol Ecol. 2004;13:2959–67.
Article
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Bell CJ, Ecker JR. Assignment of 30 microsatellite loci to the linkage of Arabidopsis. Genomics. 1994;19:137–44.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Clauss MJ, Cobban H, Mitchell-Olds T. Cross-species microsatellite markers for elucidating population genetic structure in Arabidopsis and Arabis (Brassicaeae). Mol Ecol. 2002;11:591–601.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Thorvaldsdóttir H, Robinson JT, Mesirov JP. Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief Bioinform. 2013;14:178–92.
Article
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Godé C, Decombeix I, Kostecka A, Wasowicz P, Pauwels M, Courseaux A, Saumitou-Laprade P. Nuclear microsatellite loci for Arabidopsis halleri (Brassicaceae), a model species to study plant adaptation to heavy metals. Am J Bot. 2012;99:e49–52.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Meirmans PG, Van Tienderen PH. GenoType and GenoDive: two programs for the analysis of genetic diversity of asexual organisms. Mol Ecol Notes. 2004;4:792–4.
Article
Google Scholar
Raymond M, Rousset F. GENEPOP: population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered. 1995;86:248–9.
Google Scholar
Rousset F. genepop’007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour. 2008;8:103–6.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sur Windows™ pour la génétique des populations. http://kimura.univ-montp2.fr/genetix/.
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015.
Google Scholar
Ciosi M, Miller NJ, Kim KS, Giordano R, Estoup A, Guillemaud T. Invasion of Europe by the western corn rootworm, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera: multiple transatlantic introductions with various reductions of genetic diversity. Mol Ecol. 2008;17:3614–27.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gautier M, Foucaud J, Gharbi K, Cézard T, Galan M, Loiseau A, Thomson M, Pudlo P, Kerdelhué C, Estoup A. Estimation of population allele frequencies from next-generation sequencing data: pool-versus individual-based genotyping. Mol Ecol. 2013;22:3766–79.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnetjournal. 2011;17:10.
Google Scholar
Lamesch P, Berardini TZ, Li D, Swarbreck D, Wilks C, Sasidharan R, Muller R, Dreher K, Alexander DL, Garcia-Hernandez M, et al. The Arabidopsis information resource (TAIR): improved gene annotation and new tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D1202–10.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kaul S, Koo HL, Jenkins J, Rizzo M, Rooney T, Tallon LJ, Feldblyum T, Nierman W, Benito MI, Lin XY, et al. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature. 2000;408:796–815.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
TAIR; The Arabidopsis Information Resource. http://www.arabidopsis.org/.
Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1754–60.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, Subgroup GPDP. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–9.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
CAS
Google Scholar
Kofler R, Orozco-terWengel P, De Maio N, Pandey RV, Nolte V, Futschik A, Kosiol C, Schlötterer C. PoPoolation: a toolbox for population genetic analysis of next generation sequencing data from pooled individuals. PLoS One. 2011;6:e15925.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Kofler R, Pandey RV, Schlötterer C. PoPoolation2: identifying differentiation between populations using sequencing of pooled DNA samples (Pool-Seq). Bioinformatics. 2011;27:3435–6.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Achaz G. Testing for neutrality in samples with sequencing errors. Genetics. 2008;179:1409–24.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989;123:585–95.
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Biswas S, Akey JM. Genomic insights into positive selection. Trends Genet. 2006;22:437–46.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hartl DL, Clark AG. Principles of population genetics. Sutherland: Sinauer; 2007.
Google Scholar
Goslee SC, Urban DL. The ecodist package for dissimilarity-based analysis of ecological data. J Stat Softw. 2007;22:1–19.
Article
Google Scholar
Ljungqvist M, ÅKesson M, Hansson B. Do microsatellites reflect genome-wide genetic diversity in natural populations? A comment on Väli et al. (2008). Mol Ecol. 2010;19:851–5.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wang J. Does GST, underestimate genetic differentiation from marker data? Mol Ecol. 2015;24:3546–58.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Jost L. G(ST) and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol Ecol. 2008;17:4015–26.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hoban S, Arntzen JA, Bruford MW, Godoy JA, Rus Hoelzel A, Segelbacher G, Vilà C, Bertorelle G. Comparative evaluation of potential indicators and temporal sampling protocols for monitoring genetic erosion. Evol Appl. 2014;7:984–98.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Mittell EA, Nakagawa S, Hadfield JD. Are molecular markers useful predictors of adaptive potential? Ecol Lett. 2015;18:772–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Whitlock MC. G’ST and D do not replace F
ST. Mol Ecol. 2011;20:1083–91.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Roesti M, Salzburger W, Berner D. Uninformative polymorphisms bias genome scans for signatures of selection. BMC Evol Biol. 2012;12:94.
Article
PubMed Central
PubMed
Google Scholar
Whitlock MC, McCauley DE. Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: Fst ≠ 1/(4 Nm + 1). Heredity. 1999;82:117–25.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Leinonen T, McCairns RJS, O’Hara RB, Merila J. QST-FST comparisons: evolutionary and ecological insights from genomic heterogeneity. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14:179–90.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hess JE, Matala AP, Narum SR. Comparison of SNPs and microsatellites for fine-scale application of genetic stock identification of Chinook salmon in the Columbia River Basin. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011;11:137–49.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Jennings TN, Knaus BJ, Mullins TD, Haig SM, Cronn RC. Multiplexed microsatellite recovery using massively parallel sequencing. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011;11:1060–7.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hamblin MT, Warburton ML, Buckler ES. Empirical comparison of simple sequence repeats and single nucleotide polymorphisms in assessment of maize diversity and relatedness. PLoS One. 2007;2:e1367.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
CAS
Google Scholar
Weinman LR, Solomon JW, Rubenstein DR. A comparison of single nucleotide polymorphism and microsatellite markers for analysis of parentage and kinship in a cooperatively breeding bird. Mol Ecol Resour. 2015;15:502–11.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lee T-H, Guo H, Wang X, Kim C, Paterson AH. SNPhylo: a pipeline to construct a phylogenetic tree from huge SNP data. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:1–6.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Andrews KR, Good JM, Miller MR, Luikart G, Hohenlohe PA. Harnessing the power of RADseq for ecological and evolutionary genomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2016;17:81–92.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Korneliussen TS, Albrechtsen A, Nielsen R. ANGSD: analysis of next generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014;15:1–13.
Article
Google Scholar
Foote AD, Vijay N, Avila-Arcos MC, Baird RW, Durban JW, Fumagalli M, Gibbs RA, Hanson MB, Korneliussen TS, Martin MD, et al. Genome-culture coevolution promotes rapid divergence of killer whale ecotypes. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11693.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Alkan C, Coe BP, Eichler EE. Genome structural variation discovery and genotyping. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12:363–76.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Holderegger R, Kamm U, Gugerli F. Adaptive vs. neutral genetic diversity: implications for landscape genetics. Landscape Ecol. 2006;21:797–807.
Article
Google Scholar
Turner TL, Bourne EC, Von Wettberg EJ, Hu TT, Nuzhdin SV. Population resequencing reveals local adaptation of Arabidopsis lyrata to serpentine soils. Nat Genet. 2010;42:260–3.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rellstab C, Gugerli F, Eckert AJ, Hancock AM, Holderegger R. A practical guide to environmental association analysis in landscape genomics. Mol Ecol. 2015;24:4348–70.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bonin A, Nicole F, Pompanon F, Miaud C, Taberlet P. Population adaptive index: a new method to help measure intraspecific genetic diversity and prioritize populations for conservation. Conserv Biol. 2007;21:697–708.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar