Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Upregulation of genes encoding digestive enzymes and nutrient transporters in the digestive system of broiler chickens by dietary supplementation of fiber and inclusion of coarse particle size corn

BMC Genomics volume 19, Article number: 208 (2018) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Measures to improve bird performance have been sought due to the imminent phase out of in-feed antibiotics in poultry and continued demand for higher poultry feeding efficiency. Increasing grain particle size and dietary fibre may improve gizzard function, digestive efficiency and nutrient absorption. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect increased particle size of corn and inclusion of sugarcane bagasse (SB) on mRNA expression of genes encoding digestive enzymes and nutrient transporters in broilers.

Results

A total of 336 day-old Ross 308 males were assigned in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments with corn particle size - coarse 3576 μm or fine 1113 μm geometric mean diameter, and SB - 0 or 2% inclusion. Feed conversion ratio (FCR), weight gain and feed intake were measured from d 0–10 and d 10–24. The relative gizzard weight and mRNA expression of genes encoding digestive enzymes and intestinal nutrient transporters were measured on d 24. During d 10–24, a particle size × SB interaction was observed for FCR (P < 0.01), where birds fed coarsely ground corn (CC) with 2% SB had lower FCR than those fed CC without SB. A particle size × SB interaction was observed for both expression of pepsinogen A and C (P < 0.01) which were negatively correlated with FCR on d 24. Addition of 2% SB upregulated pepsinogen A and C only in CC fed birds. Further, 2% SB also upregulated pancreatic amylase (AMY2A) and intestinal cationic amino acid transporter-1 (CAT1). Inclusion of dietary CC upregulated duodenal amino peptidase N (APN), jejunal alanine, serine, cysteine and threonine transporter-1 (ASCT1), and ileal peptide transporter-2 (PepT2).

Conclusion

These results suggest that both SB and coarse particle size modulate expression of genes encoding important digestive enzymes and nutrient transporters and thus are directly related to bird performance. These findings provide insights into the combination effects of dietary fiber and particle size in the future management of broiler feeding.

Background

Consumer pressure and legislation to ban the use of in-feed antibiotics in the EU and voluntarily removal of antibiotics from animal feed in other countries have supressed performance and profitability in broiler chickens due to enteric disorders [1, 2]. The development of antibiotic alternatives to improve digestive efficiency is becoming a topic of broad interest for the poultry industry worldwide. Strategies to improve broiler digestive efficiency and performance without reliance on antibiotics have been the focus for improving gut health and manipulating development of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). A range of nutritional interventions including; increasing grain particle size, using whole grain, and including different sources or levels of dietary fiber and other feed additives, such as probiotics, bacteriophages, enzymes and phytobiotics are currently under investigation [2,3,4].

The physical structure of feed ingredients and inclusion of dietary fiber may improve nutrient digestion and absorption as a result of increased gizzard size [3, 5] and enhanced secretion of HCl in the proventriculus [6]. Low pH in the upper GIT is known to improve solubility and absorption of minerals [7] and increase pepsin activity [8]. Well-developed gizzard musculature has been hypothesized to elevate pancreatic enzyme secretion including amylase and chymotrypsin through increased release of cholecystokinin [9]. The inclusion of fiber or coarse particle size in broiler diets not only enhances gizzard development but also increases digesta retention time and gut reflux [9, 10]. Slower digesta retention time improves nutrient digestion and absorption by increasing time of contact with absorptive cells [11]. In the chickens, the small intestine is the main site of nutrient absorption. It is known that the glucose transporters: glucose transporter-1 (GLUT1) and glucose transporter 2 (GLUT2); amino acid transporters: Na + −dependent neutral amino acid transporters, such as BoAT and ASCT1, cationic amino acid transporters, such as CAT1 and CAT2, and Na + −dependent neutral/cationic amino acid exchanger, such as y+ L amino acid transporter-1 and y+ L amino acid transporter-2, and peptide transporters, such as PepT1 and PepT2, in the small intestinal epithelium are closely associated with nutrient absorption capacity [12, 13]. Although, structural components of the diet have been reported to improve nutrient digestibility and performance in broilers [3, 14,15,16,17], there are no investigations on nutrigenomic mechanisms underlying such improvements.

This study investigated the influence of fiber supplementation and increased corn particle size on broiler performance at the gene expression level. It was hypothesized that fiber and coarse particle size would stimulate secretion of digestive enzymes and nutrient transporters that would then accelerate the digestive activity in the intestine and improve feed conversion efficiency.

Methods

Experimental design, bird management and diet

A total of 336 d-old male Ross 308 chicks were obtained on the hatching day from a local hatchery (Baiada Hatchery in Tamworth, NSW, Australia). The chicks were assigned in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments with 2 particle sizes (coarsely ground corn, CC, 3576 μm or finely ground corn, FC, 1113 μm geometric mean diameter, GMD) and 2 levels of sugarcane bagasse (0%, 2%). The geometric mean diameter of corn particle size was determined according to the American Society of Agricultural Engineers (2003). The birds were randomly allocated to 4 treatments with 6 replicate pens each stocked with 14 birds. The broiler chicks were reared in pens measuring 75 cm × 120 cm to 24 d. Hardwood shavings were used as bedding with an initial depth of 7 cm. Each pen was equipped with a single tube feeder and 2 nipple drinkers. Feed and water were provided ad libitum. The lighting, relative humidity and temperature followed Ross 308 strain guidelines [18].

Table 1 shows the ingredient and nutrient composition of experimental diets. The diets were formulated to Ross 308 specifications [18]. The composition of starter and grower diets was diluted when 2% SB added over the top of the complete feed. All diets were thoroughly mixed and cold-pelleted (65 °C). The feeding program consisted of a starter (d 0 to 10), and grower (d 11 to 24).

Table 1 Composition and nutrient content of corn base diet (%)
Full size table

The SB was provided by FCR Consulting Group, Brisbane. The composition of SB was determined (“as is” basis) for total non-starch polysaccharides (NSP) and lignin following the method described by Englyst et al. [19] and Kirk and Obst [20], respectively. The SB contained 6.1 g/kg free sugar, 191 g/kg lignin, 534 g/kg insoluble NSP and 1.9 g/kg soluble NSP.

Measurement of growth performance and gizzard weight

Birds and leftover feed in each pen (n = 6/treatment) were weighed and the average weight gain, feed intake, and FCR were calculated based on the measurements at the end of the starter, d 10, and grower, d 24 phases. On d 24, empty gizzards without proventriculi from 3 birds per pen were weighed and recorded along with corresponding bird weights. The relative gizzard weight was calculated as mass per unit of live body weight (g/100 g of live body weight).

Sampling and RNA isolation

On d 24, one bird was randomly selected from each pen and killed by cervical vertebrae dislocation. Around 2 cm from each duodenum, jejunum, ileum, proventriculus and pancreas was excised and flushed with 4 °C PBS and collected into a 2 mL Eppendorf cap lock tube, snap-frozen in liquid N2, and kept at − 80 °C until required for RNA extraction. For each sample, total RNA was extracted from the tissue after homogenization in TRIsure™ (Bioline, Sydney, Australia) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA quantity and purity was determined using a NanoDrop ND-8000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA). An RNA 6000 Nano kit was used to measure RNA integrity (RNA Integrity Number, or RIN) using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Waldbronn, Germany). The RNA samples were considered of high integrity if the RIN was higher than 7.5 [21]. The RIN values of the samples were 7.9–9.8 in the present study.

cDNA synthesis

The isolated RNA of each sample was reverse-transcribed with the QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following manufacturer’s instructions (gDNA elimination step performed). The Rotorgene 6000 real-time PCR machine (Corbett, Sydney, Australia) was employed to convert the RNA into cDNA. The cDNA was diluted three times with nuclease-free water and stored at − 20 °C until required.

Primer sources and design

In the current study, the primers were either sourced from previously published studies in chickens or designed using NCBI primer tool (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Table 2 show the primers that were used in this study. Prior to qPCR analysis, Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Germany) was employed to check the primer specificity for each pair using Agilent DNA 1000 Kit (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Germany). Only primer pairs with specific amplifications were used in this study.

Table 2 Sequences of primers used for quantitative real-time PCR
Full size table

Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR)

Quantitative PCR was performed in triplicates using a SYBR Green kit SensiFAST™ SYBR® No-ROX (Bioline, Sydney, Australia) with Rotorgene 6000 real-time PCR machine (Corbett Research, Sydney, Australia). The PCR reaction was performed in a volume of 10 μL containing 5 μL of 2× SensiFAST, 400 mM of each primer and 2 μL of cDNA template. After thermal cycling, amplification cycle (Cq) values for all genes were collected and imported into qBase+ version 3.0 (Biogazelle, Zwijnbeke, Belgium) software and analyzed against two optimized reference genes, HPRT1 and TBP, in the current study. Both reference genes were applied to the samples of each tissue. The qBase+ applied an arithmetic mean method to transform logarithmic Cq value to linear relative quantity using exponential function for relative quantification of genes [22, 23] and the output data was exported to SPSS statistics version 22 (IBM SPSS, UK) for further analysis. The relative expression levels of the genes in respective treatment groups are expressed as means of normalized relative quantities (NRQ). Relative quantity for individual genes was scaled to the lowest average expression level of the treatment being 1.

The genes analyzed in the tissues are listed as follow: PGA5, PGC and CCK, in proventriculus; AMY2A, ATP1A1, CCK1R, CCK, CELA1, CELA2A, PNLIP, in pancreas; and APN, ASCT1, ATP1A1, BoAT, CAT1, CAT2, CCK1R, CCK, EAAT3, bo,+AT, GLUT1, GLUT2, LAT1, PepT1, PepT2, SI, y+LAT1, y+LAT2, and rBAT in the intestine.

Statistical analyses

The data were analyzed using the General Linear Models (GLM) procedure of SPSS statistics version 22 (IBM SPSS, UK) for the main effect of particle sizes, and SB supplementation along with their interactions. The main effect was analyzed with a treatment with pooled values against the other treatment. Differences between mean values were determined using LSD test at the level of P < 0.05. Correlations between FCR of the grower phase, d 10–24, and the expression levels of the genes were conducted using the procedures of SPSS statistics version 22 (IBM SPSS, UK). For correlation analysis, FCR was calculated in each pen (n = 14 birds) and the mRNA expression of the proventricular pepsinogens was measured from a randomly selected bird in each pen (n = 1 bird).

Results

Performance and gizzard weight

The effect of corn particle size and SB on broiler performance is presented in Table 3. On d 10, weight gain and feed intake were significantly higher in birds fed finely ground corn (FC) than those fed coarsely ground corn (CC; P < 0.05). FCR was impaired in birds fed the diet containing 2% SB compared to those fed the diet without SB treatment during d 0–10 (P < 0.05). No interaction was observed between particle size and SB in early age (P > 0.05). During d 10–24, significant particle size × SB interactions were observed for FCR (P < 0.01). The birds fed CC with 2% SB had lower FCR than those fed CC without SB. However, this was not the case when fine corn was fed. Similarly, CC reduced FCR compared to FC only when 2% SB was included in the diet. During d 10–24, birds fed SB were heavier than those fed without SB (P < 0.05).

Table 3 Effect of particle size and sugar cane bagasse on broilers growth performance1
Full size table

The effect of corn particle size and SB on relative gizzard weight is presented in Table 4. On d 24, the broilers fed CC had heavier gizzards (P < 0.05) compared to those fed FC. A particle size × SB interaction was observed for relative gizzard weight (P < 0.05). Addition of 2% SB increased the relative gizzard weight only in the FC fed birds.

Table 4 Effect of particle size and sugar cane bagasse on relative gizzard weight at d 241
Full size table

Upregulation of pepsinogen a and C in proventriculus by sugarcane bagasse and coarsely ground corn

The mRNA expression of three genes was investigated in response to SB addition and corn particle size in the proventriculus as presented in Table 5. The mRNA expression of CCK was not affected by SB addition or corn particle size. A particle size × SB interaction was observed in the expression of genes PGA5 (A) and PGC (C; P < 0.01). The combination of SB and CC significantly upregulated PGA5 and PGC compared to the expression of genes in the other three groups. Both pepsinogen A (P < 0.01 and R = − 0.53) and C (P < 0.01 and R = − 0.59) were negatively correlated to FCR on d 24.

Table 5 Effect of particle size and sugar cane bagasse on expression of proventricular genes at d 241,2
Full size table

Upregulation of pancreatic AMY2A and CELA1 by sugarcane bagasse

The mRNA expression of seven pancreatic genes in response to feed SB addition and corn particle size was examined (Table 6). Genes AMY2A and CELA1 were upregulated by 2% SB addition to the diets (P < 0.05), while no response to SB was observed in other genes investigated, namely, ATP1A1, CCK1R, CCK, CELA2A, and PNLIP. Corn particle size did not affect the expression of pancreatic genes either as a main effect and no interactions were observed (P > 0.05).

Table 6 Effect of particle size and sugar cane bagasse on expression of pancreatic genes at d 241,2
Full size table

Upregulation of APN by coarsely ground corn and CAT1 by sugarcane bagasse in duodenum

The mRNA expression of nineteen genes was investigated in response to feed SB addition and corn particle size in the duodenum as presented in Tables 7 and 8. The CC diet significantly upregulated APN in the duodenum compared with expression of the gene in the FC diet group. No responses to CC diet were observed for other genes investigated, namely, ASCT1, ATP1A1, BoAT, CAT1, CAT2, CCK1R, CCK, bo,+AT, EAAT3, GLUT1, GLUT2, LAT1, PepT1, PepT2, SI, y+LAT2, and rBAT. Addition of 2% SB upregulated CAT1 in the duodenum compared to the expression in the birds without SB (P < 0.05). However, 2% SB did not affect the expression of the genes APN, ASCT1, ATP1A1, BoAT, CAT2, CCK1R, CCK, bo,+AT, EAAT3, GLUT1, GLUT2, LAT1, PepT1, PepT2, SI, y+LAT2, and rBAT in the duodenum (P > 0.05). A particle size × SB interaction was observed for expression of gene y+LAT1 (P < 0.05), where y+LAT1 was downregulated by CC only in the birds fed diet without SB supplementation, but no significant difference was observed for the expression of the gene between FC and CC groups when 2% SB was added.

Table 7 Effect of particle size and sugar cane bagasse on expression of duodenal genes at d 241,2
Full size table
Table 8 Effect of particle size and sugar cane bagasse on expression of duodenal genes at d 241,2
Full size table

Upregulation of jejunal ASCT1 and y+LAT2 by coarsely ground corn and CAT1 by sugarcane bagasse and downregulation of jejunal GLUT2 by sugarcane bagasse

The mRNA expression of nineteen jejunal genes in response to feed SB addition and corn particle size was examined (Tables 9 and 10). The expression of ASCT1 (P < 0.01) and y+LAT2 (P < 0.05) in jejunum were upregulated in birds fed CC diet compared with those fed FC diet. Corn particle size did not affect other genes investigated: APN, ATP1A1, BoAT, CAT1, CAT2, CCK1R, CCK, bo,+AT, EAAT3, GLUT1, GLUT2, LAT1, PepT1, PepT2, SI, y+LAT1, and rBAT, in jejunum (P > 0.05). Birds fed 2% SB had upregulated jejunal CAT1 and downregulated GLUT2 compared to birds fed diet without SB (P < 0.05). No responses to 2% SB were observed in other investigated genes: APN, ATP1A1, BoAT, CAT2, CCK1R, CCK, bo,+AT, EAAT3, GLUT1, LAT1, PepT1, PepT2, SI, y+LAT1, and rBAT, in jejunum (P > 0.05). No interactions were observed between particle size and SB on expression of other investigated genes in the jejunum. However, a tendency for a particle size × SB interaction was observed for expression of CAT1 (P = 0.077) in the jejunum, where the birds fed CC diet with 2% SB inclusion tended to upregulate CAT1.

Table 9 Effect of particle size and sugar cane bagasse on expression of jejunal genes at d 241,2
Full size table
Table 10 Effect of particle size and sugar cane bagasse on expression of jejunal genes at d 241,2
Full size table

Upregulation of ileal PepT2 by coarsely ground corn and CAT1, BoAT and ATP1A1 by sugarcane bagasse

The mRNA expression of eighteen ileal genes in response to feed SB addition and corn particle size was examined (Tables 11 and 12). Birds fed the CC diet had upregulated ileal PepT2 compared to birds fed the FC diet (P < 0.05). The CC diet tended to upregulate CCK1R (P = 0.056) and y+LAT1 (P = 0.097) in the ileum. Corn particle size did not affect the expression of: APN, ASCT1, ATP1A1, BoAT, CAT1, CAT2, bo,+AT, EAAT3, GLUT1, GLUT2, LAT1, PepT1, SI, y+LAT2 and rBAT, in the ileum. Inclusion of 2% SB upregulated expression of BoAT and CAT1 in the ileum compared to birds given no SB (P < 0.05). Inclusion of 2% SB had no effect (P > 0.05) on other genes: APN, ASCT1, CAT2, CCK1R, bo,+AT, EAAT3, GLUT1, GLUT2, LAT1, PepT1, PepT2, SI, y+LAT1, y+LAT2, and rBAT in ileum. A particle size × SB interaction was observed for expression of ATP1A1 in the ileum (P < 0.05), where 2% SB inclusion increased mRNA expression of ATP1A1 in the birds fed the CC diet but not in the birds fed the FC diet.

Table 11 Effect of particle size and sugar cane bagasse on expression of ileal genes at d 241,2
Full size table
Table 12 Effect of particle size and sugar cane bagasse on expression of ileal genes at d 241,2
Full size table

Discussion

This study investigated responses of mRNA expression of genes encoding digestive enzymes and nutrient transporters in birds fed diets with SB and/or increased corn particle size. Gene expression in the proventriculus, pancreas and intestine of broiler chickens was increased in line with bird performance and gizzard development. Addition of 2% SB and inclusion of CC particle in feed upregulated some genes encoding digestive enzymes, and nutrient transporters together with improved gizzard function and performance in birds up to d 24.

The combination of CC and SB improved broiler performance as demonstrated by lower FCR in birds fed CC together with SB. Coarse particle size and structural fiber may have: 1) extended digesta retention time, leading to prolonged exposure of nutrients to endogenous enzymes; 2) promoted gut reflux, re-exposing undigested nutrients to digestive enzymes for better digestion; 3) created a better microenvironment for enzyme activity around coarse corn particles of SB that has a strong water-holding capacity [24]; 4) enhanced gizzard activity, leading to secretion of more digestive juices and better ability to grind feed particles. Indeed, both pepsinogen A and C were correlated with FCR on d 24. The significantly greater mRNA expression of pepsinogen A and C in the birds fed CC diet supplemented with SB might increase the production of pepsin in proventriculus and improved FCR. The similarity in increase between mRNA of pepsinogen A and that of pepsinogen C suggests that the mechanism of stimulation of the two zymogens was similar and could have been caused by; physical effects of the combination of CC and SB on the oxyntic (or oxynticopeptic) cells of the proventriculus or, by one or both of the following possible mechanisms that may affect pepsinogen production: 1) the stimulating effect of coarse particles and fiber on gizzard function, in particular more frequent and powerful contractions which may potentially reflux the digesta back into the proventriculus repeatedly during each gizzard contraction and thereby allows for more proventricular secretions and thus re-expose the digesta to these two zymogens and pepsin; 2) Coarse particle and SB might cause more rapid duodenal-gizzard reflux and move the digesta back to the gizzard and then to proventriculus. Indeed, bile salts, associated with duodenum, have been reported to be found in the gizzard at low concentrations [25]. It has been hypothesized that the structural components, such as whole or coarsely ground cereals, or fiber materials, in the diet induce an increase in gastrointestinal reflux via a well-developed gizzard [25, 26]. However, in this study, the SB may have created an environment where gizzard contractions were enhanced and mucosal surface cleaned, leading to unhindered duodenal-gizzard reflux. This, in turn, could expose digesta to proventricular zymogens and enzymes repeatedly, resulting in better digestion of nutrients and a more dynamic foregut.

In recent years, the beneficial effects of fiber on gastrointestinal tract development and nutrient utilization in poultry have been discussed frequently. The source, physical structure and amount of fiber in the diet determine the effectiveness of fiber on birds [27, 28]. For instance, previous studies have reported that insoluble fiber (ARBOCEL®) increased the activity of pancreatic enzymes such as chymotrypsin [29, 30]. Furthermore, it has been suggested that oat hulls may stimulate pancreatic secretion of amylase and thus increase the activity of amylase in the jejunum [17]. The significantly greater expression of pancreatic AMY2A and CELA1 in the birds fed diet supplemented with SB is at least partially responsible for better performance in the present study. A rapid and noticeable enlargement in gizzard size was observed when structural components were included in the diet. The increase in the gizzard weight is a logical consequence of an increased need for particle size reduction, as the increased mechanical grinding activity of gizzard increases the size of the two pairs of gizzard muscles [9]. In the present study, gizzard weight was the lowest in the FC diet group, this may be due to the fact that the birds are not required to cope with the extra grinding demand from feed with fine particles prior to passing through the pyloric sphincter to the intestine. A number of studies have suggested that well developed gizzards in birds fed diets with large ingredient particles or fiber, improve gut motility, and thus digestibility and performance due to increased releases of cholecystokinin (CCK) which stimulates pancreatic enzyme secretion and gastro-duodenal reflux [3, 9, 17, 29, 31]. Although the expression of pancreatic AMY2A and CELA1 was upregulated by 2% SB, the expression of both CCK and its receptor (CCK1R) in different tissues was not affected by particle size and SB addition in this study. It has been previously reported that CCK at physiological concentrations has no influence on pancreatic secretion from isolated pancreatic acini in the chicken [32]. It has also been stated that CCK plays a more important role as a pancreas-stimulating hormone in mammals than in birds [32]. Furthermore, it was reported that the regulation of pancreatic secretion is controlled by numerous hormones such as melatonin and glucagon, regulatory peptides including C-natriuretic peptide, and neurotransmitters such as serotonin, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and gastrin releasing peptide (GIP) [33]. Therefore, the mechanism underlying the heightened secretion of pancreatic enzymes by inclusion of fiber or large feed particles in chicken diets is not well understood and further investigation is warranted.

Several studies investigating structural components of diets, such as coarse particle size or fiber, have shown improved nutrient digestibility [3, 14,15,16,17, 34] via increased digesta retention time. Reports investigating the impact of corn particle size and fiber on digestive enzymes and nutrient transporters are scant or non-existent. In the present study, broiler performance was improved by inclusion of dietary coarse particle grain and SB and various nutrient transporters and digestive enzymes in the duodenum, jejunum and ileum were shown to be upregulated. For instance, B0AT, the neutral amino acid transporter located at the brush border membrane, in ileum and CAT1, a transporter mediating the bidirectional transport of cationic amino acids, in duodenum, jejunum and ileum were upregulated by SB. Furthermore, duodenal APN, responsible for final digestion of peptides by N terminus cleavage, jejunal ASCT1, responsible for Na + −dependent neutral amino acid transporter, and jejunal y+LAT2, responsible for Na + −dependent neutral/cationic amino acid exchanger, and ileal PepT2, which has a minor contribution in transporting di- and tri-peptides, were upregulated by CC. In fact, the upregulated nutrient transporters will not only improve nutrient absorption but also play a vital role in the maintenance of intestinal barrier integrity and immune response. A deficiency of amino acids, such as alanine, cysteine, serine, threonine, arginine, and lysine, has long been known to impair immune function and increase the susceptibility of animals to infectious disease [35]. Different mechanisms can be involved to elucidate the increase in expression of amino acid transporters in the gut. For example, CAT-1 mRNA expression level varies considerably in different tissues and cell types and can be modulated by a variety of stimuli, including cell proliferation, growth factors, cytokines, hormones, and nutrients [36]. In the current study, a well-developed gizzard may generate stronger reverse peristalsis contractions that may stimulate the secretion of digestive enzymes and enzyme precursors in both the proventriculus and pancreas and consequently produce higher levels of substrates of nutrient transporters and thus upregulate those nutrient transporters in the gut. In general, three distinct sites of reverse peristalsis can be observed in the gastrointestinal tract of birds [37]: 1) gastric reflux which transfer the digesta from gizzard to proventriculus via gastroduodenal contractions and this contraction cycle takes place 2–4 times per min.; 2) the small intestinal reflux which transfers digesta from the duodenum and jejunum into the gastric area and occurs about 4 times per 60 min.; 3) cloaca-cecal reflux, which transfers urinary nitrogen to the ceca via the colon [38]. It has been well documented that structural components of the diet such as fiber and coarse or whole cereals enhance the gut motility and thereby increase the digesta retention time and better bird performance [26, 39]. Therefore, SB and CC may have increased gut motility and digesta retention time, particularly in the upper part of digestive tract, and thereby enhanced the production of digestive enzymes, enzyme precursors and nutrient transporters. These active functional proteins promote digestion of nutrients and thus the growth and feed conversion efficiency of the birds.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the inclusion of either SB or CC in a pelleted diet is beneficial to the birds by improving performance likely through the upregulation of genes encoding digestive enzymes and nutrient transporters. The combination of CC and SB was more beneficial for the upregulation of some genes such as PGA5 and PGC. The results suggest enhanced gizzard development as a mode of action for higher production of digestive enzymes and nutrient transporters. These findings provide insights on how dietary fiber and particle size independently or in combination can improve bird performance based on the analysis of gene expression. The knowledge obtained herein will be useful to understand the underlying mechanisms of how feed additives can improve nutrient digestibility and thus feed efficiency. Further, the outcomes lay a foundation for future research to elucidate the usefulness of fiber supplementation and coarse particle inclusion in feed in a nutrigenomic way.

Abbreviations

AMY2A:

pancreatic alpha 2A amylase

APN:

aminopeptidase N

ASCT1:

alanine, serine, cysteine, and threonine transporter

ATP1A1:

ATPase Na+/K+ transporting subunit alpha 1

B0AT:

solute carrier family 6, member 19

bo,+AT:

solute carrier family 7, member 9

CAT1:

cationic amino acid transporter-1

CAT2:

cationic amino acid transporter-2

CC:

coarsely ground corn

CCK:

cholecystokinin

CCK1R:

cholecystokinin type 1 receptor

CELA1:

chymotrypsin-like elastase family, member 1

CELA2A:

chymotrypsin like elastase family member 2A

EAAT3:

excitatory amino acid transporter 3

FC:

finely ground corn

FCR:

feed conversion ratio

GIP:

gastrin releasing peptide

GIT:

gastrointestinal tract

GLUT1:

glucose transporter-1

GLUT2:

glucose transporter-2

GMD:

geometric mean diameter

HPRT1:

hypoxanthine Phosphoribosyltransferase 1

LAT1:

L type amino acid transporter-1

NSP:

non-starch polysaccharides

PepT1:

peptide transporter-1

PepT2:

peptide transporter-2

PGA5:

pepsinogen A

PGC:

pepsinogen C

PNLIP:

pancreatic lipase

rBAT:

solute carrier family 3, member1

SB:

sugarcane bagasse

SI:

sucrase isomaltase

SID:

standard ileal digestible

TBP:

TATA-Box binding protein

VIP:

vasoactive intestinal peptide

y+LAT1:

y+ L amino acid transporter-1

y+LAT2:

y+ L amino acid transporter-2

References

  1. Hofacre C, Beacorn T, Collett S, Mathis G. Using competitive exclusion, mannan-oligosaccharide and other intestinal products to control necrotic enteritis. J Appl Poult Res. 2003;12:60–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Caly DL, D'Inca R, Auclair E, Drider D. Alternatives to antibiotics to prevent necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens: a microbiologist's perspective. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1336.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kheravii SK, Swick RA, Choct M, Wu S-B. Coarse particle inclusion and lignocellulose-rich fiber addition in feed benefit performance and health of broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2017a; https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex123.

  4. Zaefarian F, Abdollahi M, Ravindran V. Particle size and feed form in broiler diets: impact on gastrointestinal tract development and gut health. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2016;72:277–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hetland H, Svihus B, Choct M. Role of insoluble fiber on gizzard activity in layers. J Appl Poult Res. 2005;14:38–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Duke G. Alimentary canal: secretion and digestion, special digestive functions, and absorption. Edtion ed. Avian physiology. New York, NY: Springer, 1986:289–302.

  7. Guinotte F, Gautron J, Nys Y, Soumarmon A. Calcium solubilization and retention in the gastrointestinal tract in chicks (Gallus domesticus) as a function of gastric acid secretion inhibition and of calcium carbonate particle size. Br J Nutr. 1995;73:125–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sklan D, Shachaf B, Baron J, Hurwitz S. Retrograde movement of digesta in the duodenum of the chick: extent, frequency, and nutritional implications. J Nutr. 1978;108:1485–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Svihus B. The gizzard: function, influence of diet structure and effects on nutrient availability. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2011;67(02):207–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043933911000249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sacranie A, Svihus B, Denstadli V, Moen B, Iji P, Choct M. The effect of insoluble fiber and intermittent feeding on gizzard development, gut motility, and performance of broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2012;91:693–700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Washburn K. Efficiency of feed utilization and rate of feed passage through the digestive system. Poult Sci. 1991;70:447–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Röder PV, Geillinger KE, Zietek TS, Thorens B, Koepsell H, Daniel H. The role of SGLT1 and GLUT2 in intestinal glucose transport and sensing. PLoS One. 2014;9:e89977.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Fotiadis D, Kanai Y, Palacín M. The SLC3 and SLC7 families of amino acid transporters. Mol Asp Med. 2013;34:139–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jiménez-Moreno E, de Coca-Sinova A, González-Alvarado J, Mateos G. Inclusion of insoluble fiber sources in mash or pellet diets for young broilers. 1. Effects on growth performance and water intake. Poult Sci. 2016:41–52.

  15. Xu Y, Stark C, Ferket P, Williams C, Auttawong S, Brake J. Effects of dietary coarsely ground corn and litter type on broiler live performance, litter characteristics, gastrointestinal tract development, apparent ileal digestibility of energy and nitrogen, and intestinal morphology. Poult Sci. 2015a;94:353–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu Y, Stark C, Ferket P, Williams C, Pacheco W, Brake J. Effect of dietary coarsely ground corn on broiler live performance, gastrointestinal tract development, apparent ileal digestibility of energy and nitrogen, and digesta particle size distribution and retention time. Poult Sci. 2015b;94:53–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hetland H, Svihus B, Krogdahl A. Effects of oat hulls and wood shavings on digestion in broilers and layers fed diets based on whole or ground wheat. Br Poult Sci. 2003;44:275–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/0007166031000124595.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aviangen. Ross 308 broiler performance objectives. 2014; http:// http://en.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_Broiler/Ross-Broiler-Handbook-2014i-EN.pdf. Accessed 13 Mar 2018.

  19. Englyst HN, Quigley ME, Hudson GJ. Determination of dietary fibre as non-starch polysaccharides with gas–liquid chromatographic, high-performance liquid chromatographic or spectrophotometric measurement of constituent sugars. Analyst. 1994;119:1497–509.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kirk TK, Obst JR. Lignin determination. Methods Enzymol. 1988;161:87–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Choi S, Ray HE, Lai S-H, Alwood JS, Globus RK. Preservation of multiple mammalian tissues to maximize science return from ground based and spaceflight experiments. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0167391.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 2002;3:research0034. 1.

  23. Hellemans J, Mortier G, De Paepe A, Speleman F, Vandesompele J. qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real-time quantitative PCR data. Genome Biol 2007;8:R19.

  24. Kheravii SK, Swick RA, Choct M, Wu S-B. Dietary sugarcane bagasse and coarse particle size of corn are beneficial to performance and gizzard development in broilers fed normal and high sodium diets. Poult Sci. 2017;96(11):4006–16. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex225.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sacranie A, Iji P, Choct M, Scott T. Reflux of digesta and its implications for nutrient digestion and bird health. Australian Poultry Science Symposium. 2005:171–5.

  26. Svihus B. Function of the digestive system. J Appl Poult Res. 2014;23:306–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hetland H, Svihus B. Effect of oat hulls on performance, gut capacity and feed passage time in broiler chickens. Br Poult Sci. 2001;42:354–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660120055331.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jiménez-Moreno E, Frikha M, de Coca-Sinova A, García J, Mateos GG. Oat hulls and sugar beet pulp in diets for broilers 1. Effects on growth performance and nutrient digestibility. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2013a;182:33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.03.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yokhana J, Parkinson G, Frankel T. Effect of insoluble fiber supplementation applied at different ages on digestive organ weight and digestive enzymes of layer-strain poultry. Poult Sci. 2016;95:550–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bogułsawska-Tryk M. Effect of different levels of cellulose in the diet on the proteolytic activity of the pancreas in broiler chickens. Folia Biol. 2005;53(Supplement 1):19–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Svihus B, Juvik E, Hetland H, Krogdahl Å. Causes for improvement in nutritive value of broiler chicken diets with whole wheat instead of ground wheat. Br Poult Sci. 2004;45:55–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660410001668860.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Murai A, Satoh S, Okumura J-i, Furuse M. Factors regulating amylase secretion from chicken pancreatic acini in vitro. Life Sci. 2000;66:585–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chandra R, Liddle RA. Neural and hormonal regulation of pancreatic secretion. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2009;25:441.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Kheravii SK, Swick RA, Choct M, Wu S-B. Roles of sugarcane bagasse and corn particle size in nutrient digestibility and gizzard in broilers. European symposium on poultry. Nutrition. 2017;

  35. Li P, Yin Y-L, Li D, Kim SW, Amino WG. Acids and immune function. Br J Nutr. 2007;98:237–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hatzoglou M, Fernandez J, Yaman I, Closs E. Regulation of cationic amino acid transport: the story of the CAT-1 transporter. Annu Rev Nutr. 2004;24:377–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Duke G. Gastrointestinal motility and its regulation. Poult Sci. 1982;61:1245–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Karasawa Y. Significant role of the nitrogen recycling system through the ceca occurs in protein-depleted chickens. J Exp Zool. 1999;283:418–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sacranie A. How feed constituents regulate gut motility, feed utilisation and growth in broiler chickens. Doctor of Philosophy thesis: University of New England. 2010.

  40. Gilbert E, Li H, Emmerson D, Webb K, Wong E. Developmental regulation of nutrient transporter and enzyme mRNA abundance in the small intestine of broilers. Poult Sci. 2007;86:1739–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Paris N, Wong E. Expression of digestive enzymes and nutrient transporters in the intestine of Eimeria maxima-infected chickens. Poult Sci. 2013;92(5):1331.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ohkubo T, Shamoto K, Ogino T. Structure and tissue distribution of cholecystokinin-1 receptor in chicken. J Poult Sci. 2007;44:98–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Su S, Miska K, Fetterer R, Jenkins M, Wong E. Expression of digestive enzymes and nutrient transporters in Eimeria acervulina-challenged layers and broilers. Poult Sci. 2014;93:1217–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Guo S, Liu D, Zhao X, Li C, Guo Y. Xylanase supplementation of a wheat-based diet improved nutrient digestion and mRNA expression of intestinal nutrient transporters in broiler chickens infected with Clostridium perfringens. Poult Sci. 2014;93:94–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Yang F, Lei X, Rodriguez-Palacios A, Tang C, Yue H. Selection of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR analysis in chicken embryo fibroblasts infected with avian leukosis virus subgroup J. BMC Res Notes. 2013;6:402.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Li YP, Bang DD, Handberg KJ, Jorgensen PH, Zhang MF. Evaluation of the suitability of six host genes as internal control in real-time RT-PCR assays in chicken embryo cell cultures infected with infectious bursal disease virus. Vet Microbiol. 2005;110:155–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Higher Committee for Education Development in Iraq (HCED) for providing Sarbast Kheravii with the scholarship for his PhD study. Dr Santiago Ramirez of FCR Consulting Group for providing SB for this studyauthors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Data is available from corresponding author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Animal Science, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Elm Avenue, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia

    Sarbast K. Kheravii, Robert A. Swick, Mingan Choct & Shu-Biao Wu

  2. Animal production, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Duhok, Duhok, Kurdistan, 42003, Iraq

    Sarbast K. Kheravii

Authors
  1. Sarbast K. Kheravii
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert A. Swick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mingan Choct
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shu-Biao Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SKK performed the experiment and lab work, analyzed and interpreted the data, designed primers and drafted the manuscript. MC designed and supervised the experiment and revised the manuscript critically. RAS supervised the experiment and critically revised the manuscript. SBW participated the design of the experiment, directed molecular laboratory work and data analysis, interpreted data, and critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shu-Biao Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All bird management procedures including health, care and use of laboratory animals were fulfilled with the Australian Code for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes.The experiment was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the University of New England (Approval No: AEC 15–053).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kheravii, S.K., Swick, R.A., Choct, M. et al. Upregulation of genes encoding digestive enzymes and nutrient transporters in the digestive system of broiler chickens by dietary supplementation of fiber and inclusion of coarse particle size corn. BMC Genomics 19, 208 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4592-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4592-2

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us