Skip to main content
Download PDF

What determines host specificity in hyperspecialized plant parasitic nematodes?

BMC Genomics volume 20, Article number: 457 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In hyperspecialized parasites, the ability to grow on a particular host relies on specific virulence factors called effectors. These excreted proteins are involved in the molecular mechanisms of parasitism and distinguish virulent pathogens from non-virulent related species. The potato cyst nematodes (PCN) Globodera rostochiensis and G. pallida are major plant-parasitic nematodes developing on numerous solanaceous species including potato. Their close relatives, G. tabacum and G. mexicana are stimulated by potato root diffusate but unable to establish a feeding site on this plant host.

Results

RNA sequencing was used to characterize transcriptomic differences among these four Globodera species and to identify genes associated with host specificity. We identified seven transcripts that were unique to PCN species, including a protein involved in ubiquitination. We also found 545 genes that were differentially expressed between PCN and non-PCN species, including 78 genes coding for effector proteins, which represent more than a 6-fold enrichment compared to the whole transcriptome. Gene polymorphism analysis identified 359 homozygous non-synonymous variants showing a strong evidence for selection in PCN species.

Conclusions

Overall, we demonstrated that the determinant of host specificity resides in the regulation of essential effector gene expression that could be under the control of a single or of very few regulatory genes. Such genes are therefore promising targets for the development of novel and more sustainable resistances against potato cyst nematodes.

Background

Nematodes are a very diverse phylum of animals living in a wide range of environments. Most of them feed on microorganisms or organic matter detritus in a free-living mode of existence. However, some species have diverged towards a parasitic lifestyle on higher organisms such as plants and animals, often in complex obligate associations. This transition to parasitism has followed morphological adaptation, but also the acquisition of genes coding for excreted proteins giving them the ability to feed and survive on their host. Different human- and animal-parasitic nematodes have been studied extensively but despite the importance of plant-parasitic nematodes (PPN), many aspects of the infection process are still largely unknown [1]. PPNs are plant pathogens of great importance and represent a significant constraint on global food production causing yield losses estimated at $157 billion every year [2]. Over 4100 species of PPNs have been described to date growing on all major cultivated crops in the world, the most damaging families being the Meloidogynidae and Heteroderidae including Meloidogyne spp., Globodera spp., and Heterodera spp. [1, 3]. It is now generally accepted that after the development of an anatomical structure used for plant cell wall puncturing and nutrient uptake called the stylet, the ability of nematodes to parasitize plants was facilitated by the acquisition of bacterial genes through horizontal gene transfer (e.g. cellulases, pectate lyases, xylanases, galactosidases, and expansin-like proteins) [4,5,6,7,8,9]. Host penetration, the establishment of a feeding site and suppression of host defenses are key stages of the infection process and are highly dependent on their set of specific secreted proteins called effectors, used by PPNs to manipulate the host to their benefit [10]. These effectors are responsible for most of the interactions with their host and given their importance in the infection mechanisms, substantial research efforts have been put on these molecules in recent years [11]. These effectors are also typically involved in evolutionary arm races between plants and parasites [12]. Although different plant-parasitic nematodes within a group (e.g. root-knot nematodes, cyst nematodes) have a common arsenal of effectors, it is not yet known exactly how this arsenal differs among species and especially among closely related species showing different host ranges. It was previously showed that the sequence polymorphism of the pectate lyase 2 effector among two potato cyst nematode species and one tobacco cyst nematode species can be associated to some extent to their host range variation [13]. Also at an intraspecific level, the ability to grow on potato cultivars harboring the H1 resistance gene was concordant with polymorphism in two effector genes (putative cellulose binding protein and 3H07 ubiquitin extension) found in virulent Globodera rostochiensis populations [14]. Studies conducted on other plant parasites like fungi have also associated variants in effector genes with their host range variation, as shown by the specific non-synonymous variants in two genes that appeared to be crucial for Zymoseptoria tritici virulence on wheat [15]. It has also been shown that effector genes contain a greater proportion of non-synonymous mutations compared to other genes [14]. To better understand this relationship, a formal comparison of genetic variation between closely related species having different host ranges would help to identify elements that are associated with host specificity.

The genus Globodera includes more than a dozen species parasitic to either Solanaceae or Compositae plants, which can be differentiated through their host range. All Globodera of Solanaceae species are parasitic on tomato and some solanaceaeous weeds but only G. rostochiensis (Wollenweber), G. pallida (Stone), and G. ellingtonae (Handoo, Carter, Skantar & Chitwood) are parasitic on potato. G. tabacum (Lownsbery & Lownsbery) is found in a dozen tobacco-producing countries [16] and is parasitic on tobacco but not on potato, while G. mexicana (Campos-Vela) is mainly found in Mexico [17] and is parasitic on Solanum nigrum but not parasitic on either tobacco or potato.

Potato cyst nematodes (PCN), G. rostochiensis and G. pallida, are hyperspecialized plant-parasites considered as major agricultural threats as they are responsible for the loss of 9% of the world’s potato production each year [16, 17]. Originated in South America, PCN are now present in over 75 countries, where they are often considered as regulated quarantine organisms [18, 19]. The PCN infection process starts when the dormant eggs receive an appropriate chemical signal from the root diffusate of a potential host. The nematodes will then hatch and migrate toward the roots. Using different secreted enzymes, they will enter the roots and transform a plant cell in the root inner cortex layers to establish a complex feeding site, named syncytium, a highly metabolically active structure with enriched cytoplasm [18, 19]. The PCN induce a cascade of changes in host-gene expression, and cell fusion to form a syncytium. How the effectors cause the hypertrophy and endopolyploidization of feeding cells and their interplay with plant hormones is not yet fully understood [8, 20]. The important diversion of plant nutriments towards the nematodes will limit plant growth and eventually cause heavy yield loss. After maturation and fecundation, PCN females will dry to form a cyst, a protective shell, containing up to 300 eggs able to survive more than 20 years in soil [21, 22].

As G. tabacum shares a high level of genetic similarity with G. rostochiensis [13, 23], and G. mexicana with G. pallida [24, 25], these species are therefore perfect candidates for a transcriptomic comparison analysis according to their pathogenic status on potato plants. Transcriptomic study allows reduction of genomic complexity by sequencing only coding regions, in which a large proportion of significantly functional variants are expected, also allowing identification of genes whose expression or allelic frequency can be correlated to a specific characteristic [26]. Other studies have focused on the discovery of effectors in plant-parasitic nematodes, including PCNs [27,28,29,30,31], as well as on the transcriptomic study of different pathotypes [14] or life stages [32, 33] of G. rostochiensis and G. pallida, but to our knowledge, a direct transcriptomic comparison of pathogenic and non-pathogenic Globodera species on potato has never been done. The aims of this study were to characterize the transcriptomic differences between four Globodera species exposed to potato root diffusate and to identify genes putatively involved in host specificity, using RNA sequencing to look at changes in gene expression and genetic variation between populations.

Results

Sequencing and mapping

Exposure to potato root diffusate successfully induced hatching of a similar proportion of J2 larvae for all samples (data not shown). RNA sequencing of eight Globodera populations yielded a total of 233 M paired-end reads (2 × 125 bp). A mean of 29 M reads per sample, spanning from 24.1 M to 36.2 M reads was obtained (Table 1). The percentage of reads that successfully mapped to the G. rostochiensis reference transcriptome was on average 79.4% for G. rostochiensis, 74.2% for G. pallida, 69.3% for G. tabacum and 56.1% for G. mexicana. Horizontal coverage (breadth of coverage) was similar for all populations with reads mapping to 95.9 to 98.9% of the reference transcripts (Table 1). The phylogenetic analysis, performed using the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene, resulted in a greater genetic similarity between G. rostochiensis and G. tabacum, and between G. pallida and G. mexicana (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

Table 1 Sequencing yield and mapping statistics
Full size table

Quantitative analysis and identification of differentially expressed genes

Seven transcripts were unique to G. rostochiensis and G. pallida and presumed missing from G. mexicana and G. tabacum transcriptomes (Table 2). Among these, six were coding for unknown proteins, and the remaining one (GROS_g11284.t1) was annotated as Polyubiquitin-B protein. To further investigate their functions, transcripts of unknown proteins were realigned to G. rostochiensis transcriptome to find similar sequences. Transcript GROS_g12023.t1, was found to be similar to GROS_13581.t1, which have a CHROMO domain (PFAM 00385), suggesting those genes could be implicated in the modification of the chromatin organization. In order to investigate if these transcripts correspond to missing genes in the G. tabacum and G. mexicana species, qPCR validation were performed on genomic DNA of the four Globodera species. Amplification products were obtained in all cases, except that amplification product corresponding to GROS_g11284.t1 and GROS_g09749.t1 were not detected for G. mexicana and amplification product corresponding to GROS_g12023.t1 was not detected for either G. tabacum and G. mexicana, suggesting in this last case a complete absence of the corresponding gene in the G. mexicana and G. tabacum genomes.

Table 2 Sequences only expressed in PCN species (Globodera rostochiensis and G. pallida)
Full size table

A total of 545 genes were found to be differentially expressed, 392 being up- and 153 down-regulated in PCN species (Fig. 1; Additional file 2: Table S1). The most differentially expressed genes were coding for a SMC (structural maintenance of chromosomes) protein and a peptidase M13 with fold changes of 30.6 and 28.5, respectively. Among DEGs, 216 were unknown genes, including 74 having a signal peptide for secretion. In the remaining 329 DEGs with known functions, 78 were known effector genes, 68 up- and 10 down-regulated in PCN populations (Fig. 2). The fold change of these effector genes varied from 26.8 (putative effector SPRY domain-containing protein 19) to 2.2 (putative dorsal gland cell-specific expression protein), with a mean fold change of 6.6 for the 68 effectors genes up-regulated in PCN populations and 3.3 for the ten genes up-regulated in non-PCN populations.

Fig. 1
figure1

Clustering of Globodera species based on expression value of 545 differentially expressed genes. Differential analysis was performed by group comparison according to their pathogenicity on potato; G. rostochiensis and G. pallida populations vs. G. mexicana and G. tabacum populations (GrQC, GrU1, GpA5, GpB1 vs GtA1, GtA2, GmA1, GmA2). Expression values are score given by pheatmap function (pheatmap 1.0.10 package in R) calculated using normalized read counts, as calculated by DESEQ2

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure2

Differentially expressed effector genes between four Globodera species. Differential analysis was performed by group comparison according to their pathogenicity on potato; G. rostochiensis and G. pallida vs. G. mexicana and G. tabacum. Expression values are score given by pheatmap function (pheatmap 1.0.10 package in R) calculated using normalized read counts, as calculated by DESeq2. SeqID and Gene description corresponds to sequences ID and annotation of G. rostochiensis reference transcriptome (nGr.v1.1). The presence of a signal peptide was confirmed in the transcripts marked with an (*) but was not possible to evaluate in the others due to a truncated 5′ sequence

Full size image

Variant analysis

The analysis of gene polymorphism between the samples identified 1,062,443 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), 63,455 insertions or deletions (Indels) and 21,161 complex events over 1,107,386 loci. As expected, G. rostochiensis has the least number of variants when compared to the reference transcriptome (6%), followed by G. tabacum (34%), G. mexicana (47%) and G. pallida (56%). Results were very similar between the different populations of each species. Using a Bayesian inference genome scan approach, we highlighted 1181 genetic variants that were under selection in PCN species. Among them, 359 were homozygous non-synonymous variants in non-PCN populations (Additional file 3: Table S2). Ten of these genes were coding for known effectors (Table 3) and 21 genes with unknown function contained a signal peptide for secretion. The effects of these gene variations were missense variants (325), frameshift (15), conservative inframe deletion (7), disruptive inframe deletion (4), disruptive inframe insertion (3), stop gained (2), conservative inframe insertion (2) and stop codon lost (1). However, despite the presence of a variant at the same position in all populations from the same group, these variants did not always have the same impact and therefore, no frameshift, stop gained or stop codon lost were shared by all non-PCN population. For example, contig GROS_g02285.t1 has a guanine duplication (134dupG) at position 134 causing a frameshift for all populations of G. tabacum, whereas populations of G. mexicana have a SNP at the same position (134G > A) only resulting in an amino acid modification.

Table 3 Homozygous non-synonymous variants in effector genes found only in non-PCN species
Full size table

qRT-PCR analysis

A subset of the differentially expressed effector genes was selected and tested by RT-qPCR to confirm their expression following exposure to root diffusate. Tested genes included RBP-1, two putative effector SPRY domain-containing protein 19, pectate lyase 1, glutathione peroxidase and Peptidase M13. When exposed to potato root diffusate, no significant difference was observed in expression levels between PCN species for all the genes tested (Fig. 3a). In non-PCN species, they were all down-regulated with a mean fold change of − 3.86, spanning from − 0.53 to − 10.88 (Fig. 3b). The qRT-PCR assay was not able to detect the presence of Peptidase M13 gene in non-PCN species, although it amplifies well on gDNA from these species (data not shown), confirming that the gene is not or very poorly expressed in non-PCN. The differences in expression of these genes between PCN and non-PCN species obtained by RT-qPCR were similar to those obtained by RNA-seq. The expression of these genes was also monitored after exposure to tomato root diffusate in order to see the effect of a different host on effector gene expression for PCN species. The expression of glutathione peroxidase and peptidase M13 remained similar to when exposed to potato root diffusate, whereas RBP-1, the two SPRY domain-containing proteins 19 and pectate lyase 1 were down-regulated (respectively − 0.67, − 4.16, − 3.88 and − 11.19) (Fig. 3c).

Fig. 3
figure3

Expression of genes putatively associated with host preference in potato cyst nematodes. Change in the expression of selected effector genes after exposure to potato root diffusate in (A) potato cyst nematodes (PCN) species, G. rostochiensis and G. pallida, (B) non-PCN species, G. tabacum and G. mexicana or (C) PCN species exposed to tomato root diffusate. Expression was assessed by qRT-PCR and normalized using a set of reference genes (aaRS, PMP-3, and GR). The expression level of G. rostochiensis exposed to potato root diffusate was used as the calibrator for relative expression calculation. A default value of − 15 was assigned to samples without detectable expression. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean of each group, and significant differences are indicated by an asterisk (*) (Tukey’s test)

Full size image

Discussion

In this study, we posit that genes essential for compatible host-parasite interactions could be identified by comparing the transcriptomes of the infective stage of genetically similar Globodera species with different host preferences. Specifically, we investigated the ability of four Globodera species to infect potato. In previous studies, plant-parasitic nematodes have often been compared to free-living nematodes to identify genes involved in plant parasitism [34, 35]. Surprisingly, this resulted in the discovery of many genes that were previously never found in Metazoa (e.g. cellulase) [6]. These genes, involved in plant cell wall degradation, defense suppression, feeding site establishment, and nutrient processes, were shown to be acquired from horizontal gene transfer mainly from bacteria [6] and are now considered as an effector set, promoting the ability of plant-parasitic nematodes to grow and feed on their host. Here, we compared closely related species and searched for genes directly related to host specificity.

Understanding in detail the molecular bases of pathogenicity is a major step in plant parasitic nematology, as it is a critical turning point that can lead to the development of truly effective control methods against these pathogens. Although the host range shift between G. tabacum and G. mexicana may have occurred after their speciation (G. tabacum is genetically closer to G. rostochiensis, and G. mexicana to G. pallida), one can hypothesize that the same genetic variants should be involved, because the traits evolved from a similar genetic starting point [36]. We, therefore, assessed the changes in gene expression and gene polymorphism between potato-host and potato-non-host populations to find differences linked to host range variations, using RNA sequencing.

A total of seven predicted gene transcripts were unique to the PCN species, G. rostochiensis and G. pallida, as compared with the species non-pathogenic to potato, G. tabacum, and G. mexicana. One encodes for an ubiquitin, a protein involved in protein degradation and in regulation of gene expression when associated with histones. Several ubiquitin proteins are known to be effector proteins (e.g. Ubiquitin extension protein, Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase), and studies have indicated that ubiquitins probably play critical roles in plant-nematode interactions, promoting the survival of parasitic nematode [14, 37, 38]. Different ubiquitin-proteasome systems of human parasites were shown to serve as important virulence factors [39]. The other six predicted genes have unknown functions, but were all previously reported, including in other pathogens (Table 2), a result that support a putative role in parasitism. One of these genes (GROS_g12023.t1) was not amplified from the gDNA of G. tabacum and G. mexicana and presumed missing from their genome. Although no function was associated with this gene, a signature match was observed with a chromo domain. This protein structural domain is associated with chromatin organization and gene expression. This result may indicate that the loss of this gene may have impacted the expression of other genes involved in the nematode capacity to infect potato. The amplification of the other genes in the gDNA of G. tabacum and G. mexicana demonstrates that although the genes are present, they are not expressed under these conditions.

By comparing whole transcriptomic data, several genes and alleles whose expressions were correlated to the ability to parasitize the potato plant were identified. This includes 545 DEGs, among which 78 were known effector proteins (14.3%). Through the entire G. rostochiensis reference transcriptome (nGr.v1.1), 315 known or putative effector genes were identified based on previously published datasets [14, 37] which represent 2.2% of the 14,309 predicted genes. Thus, almost 25% of these effector genes were up-regulated in PCN species in our experiment, representing a significant enrichment (6.5 times more represented) compared to the whole transcriptome. Among the 78 differentially expressed effector genes identified, 39 were linked to microtubule cytoskeleton organization, a key element in the feeding site establishment essential to plant-parasitic nematodes. Without successfully establishing a feeding-site, the nematode fails to feed itself and dies without triggering a defense response. This corresponds to the situation observed for G. mexicana larvae that are able to invade the potato roots and migrate towards the vascular cylinder but fail to initiate a feeding site in potato roots. This enrichment of effector gene transcription in PCN species could be the result of a poor activation of effector gene transcription in non-PCN populations when exposed to potato root diffusate. The most significantly overexpressed DEG was a SMC_N family protein gene that was up-regulated 30.6 times in PCN populations. The SMC family proteins are involved in chromatin and DNA dynamics [40]. Furthermore, it was recently shown that one of the first genes expressed in G. rostochiensis and G. pallida following exposure to potato root diffusate was coding for a neprilysin protein, a “transmembrane metalloprotease able to activate/inactivate peptide hormones that could be involved in a cascade of events” [32, 41]. Interestingly, the second most highly overexpressed gene in our dataset was a peptidase M13 (GROS_g12349.t1), an unassigned homolog of the neprilysin gene, that was up-regulated 28.5 times in PCN populations. Among other up-regulated DEGs in PCN populations, 11 (3.4%) were also involved in the regulation of gene expression. The chemical signals of potato root diffusate may not allow proper activation of the infective stage of J2 larvae for non-PCN populations. Up-regulation of several regulatory genes was not observed in J2 larvae following potato root diffusates exposure, unlike PCN populations. The decreased expression of certain effector genes, when exposed to tomato root diffusate, in PCN species, as well as the increased expression of these genes in non-PCN species when exposed to tomato root diffusate, shows that the parasitic nematode may adjust its set of effectors for each potential host.

In addition, 359 non-synonymous variants showed evidence for selection between PCN and non-PCN species. Among these, ten were effector genes (Table 3) and 21 others with unknown function contained a signal peptide for excretion. These non-synonymous variants may affect the function of these effectors and pathogenicity. Also, most amino acid replacements were non-conservative, with an amino acid replacement from another side chain group, which increase the impact on protein function [42]. Several cases of polymorphism of a single amino acid having a major impact on the function of a protein have been reported, including some in these highlighted effector genes. Secreted chorismate mutase is thought to alter plant cell development, cell growth, and plant defenses and is an important virulence factor found in many plant pathogens (e.g. Meloidogyne javanica, Ustilago maydis) [43, 44]. It was shown that three single amino acid polymorphisms in Heterodera glycines chorismate mutase were associated with the ability to break host resistance on two particular soybean cultivars [45].

In this study, we highlighted significant differences in gene expression and gene variation between PCN (G. rostochiensis and G. pallida) and non-PCN species (G. tabacum and G. mexicana), although they are extremely close genetically. These distinctions were particularly evident in effector genes, which were highly enriched among DEGs and whose expression was reliant on the host, despite the fact that all species share a similar effector gene set in their genome, and that only a few non-synonymous variants were found in effector genes of non-PCN species. Therefore, it seems that the determinant of host specificity may reside in the regulation of essential effector gene expression. Because neprilysin was recently suggested to be involved in the early response to root diffusate and was highly overexpressed in PCN species, it might be closely implicated in pathogenicity. Ubiquitin and other genes unique to PCN, particularly those absent from non-PCN genome, also appeared as good candidates. We are strongly confident that genes responsible for the inability of non-PCN species to successfully infect potato plants are highlighted within our results and that a limited number of potential candidates have been identified.

Conclusions

The identification of genetic particularities leading to host specificity in hyperspecialized parasites could allow designing new effective control strategies. Indeed, the inhibition of key regulators involved in host recognition may prevent the activation of infective stage and avoid substantial yield losses. Here, we showed significant differences in gene expression between PCN and non-PCN species and that host specificity could result from the regulation of a specific set of effector genes essential to parasitize specific host in closely related species. It seems that the chemical signal from root diffusate of a specific host could activate the transcription of a specific set of effectors and although we have not yet identified the exact genes involved in this regulation, we are confident that the neprilysin gene is implicated.

In future work, it would be interesting to overexpress the neprilysin gene in G. mexicana and G. tabacum to verify if this induces an up-regulation of regulator or effector genes. The identification of a single regulator gene could be used as a target for the control of PCN in a host-induced gene silencing approach.

Methods

Globodera populations

In this study, eight populations representing four species were compared. Two PCN species, G. rostochiensis (populations St-Amable and Netherland) and G. pallida (populations Chavornay and Noirmoutier) were compared to two non-PCN species G. tabacum (populations 75,181 and GV1) and G. mexicana (populations Tlaxcala and GM5) (Table 4). Twenty-five potato plants cv. Snowden and 25 tomato plants cv. MoneyMaker were grown in perlite, in 2 L containers, until they reached about 15 cm height. Root diffusate was harvested once a week, for six consecutive weeks, by the method of Fenwick [46]. Perlite was drenched with tap water until saturation and the flowing liquid was collected. The procedure was repeated two more times and the total collected liquid was filtered using milk filters (D-547, KenAG). Root diffusates were kept at 4 °C in dark plastic containers until use (< 2 months). Three hundred cysts of each population were immerged in filtered distilled water (0.2 μm Nalgene 25 mm syringe filters, Thermo Scientific) for one week and then in filtered root diffusate (0.45 μm Nalgene 25 mm syringe filters, Thermo Scientific) for three additional weeks to induce hatching of second stage larvae (J2), used for the RNA extraction.

Table 4 Globodera populations and species used in this study
Full size table

RNA extraction and sequencing

Each sample was homogenized in 650 μl lysis buffer RLT Plus (Qiagen) with a 6 mm zirconium grinding bead and 200 μL of 1 mm zirconium beads in 2 ml tubes using the PowerLyzer 24 Homogenizer (Qiagen) and stored at − 80 °C until RNA purification. Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy Mini Kit Plus (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instruction and stored at − 80 °C. RNA was quantified, and its integrity assessed using a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies) with the RNA 6000 Nano kit. All RNA samples had a RIN value ≥7. Libraries were generated using TruSeq Stranded mRNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina). Paired-end sequencing was done using the TruSeq SBS V3 2 × 125 bp chip on a HiSeq2500 sequencer (Illumina) at the McGill University and Genome Quebec Innovation Center in Montreal, Canada. All eight samples were multiplexed and sequenced on a single lane.

Sequences processing

Raw reads from all populations were trim using Trimmomatic 0.36 [47] with default parameters and were mapped to the G. rostochiensis transcriptome (assembly version nGr.v1.1) [14] using BWA-Mem 0.7.12 with default parameters [48]. The G. rostochiensis transcriptome contains 14,309 putative genes. It was chosen for mapping and downstream analysis in order to work with a near complete transcriptome, to avoid contaminating sequences and because the genes providing the ability to grow on potato are theoretically included in it. To obtain up to date annotations for the reference transcriptome, we performed a conserved domain search using CD-Search 3.16 with default parameters [49]. Predicted amino acid sequences were used as an input and were obtained using AUGUSTUS 3.3 [50] with Caenorhabditis elegans as species parameter. In addition, sequence similarity search using NCBI [51], KEGG [52], and UniProt [53] databases were performed for unknown sequences of interest.

A phylogenetic analysis was performed using Phylogeny.fr (approximate likelihood ratio approach; bootstrap value = 100), a web-based wrapper-tool analysing phylogenetic relationships between molecular sequences [54], integrating MUSCLE 3.8.31 [55], Gblocks 0.91b [56], PhyML 3.1/3.0 (substitution model: HKY85) [57], and TreeDyn 198.3 [58]. The analysis was performed using the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene, a gene commonly used in nematode phylogenetic studies [59], and included a sequence from C. elegans for comparison (Accession number: NM_067514).

Quantitative analysis

Read counts for the statistical analysis was performed using Corset 1.04 software with default parameters [60]. Statistical analysis, including normalization and differently expressed genes (DEG) identification, was made using the DEseq2 1.14.1 Bioconductor package in R [61]. The eight populations were separated into two groups according to their host/non-host status on potato for DEG identification (GrQC, GrU1, GpA5, GpB1 vs GtA1, GtA2, GmA1, GmA2) using a parametric Wald test (DE; P < 0.01), a normalized minimum read count of 50 for all populations and a log2 fold change (log2FC) ≥ 1.

Variant analysis

Variant calling was done on all eight populations using Freebayes 1.0.2 software, a bayesian genetic variant detector designed to detect possible SNPs (single-nucleotide polymorphisms), indels (insertions and deletions), and complex events [62]. Analysis was done using mapping files and the reference transcriptome as input with a minimum phred score of 30 and a minimum coverage of 10. BayeScan 2.1 [63] was then used to identify loci under natural selection, using allele frequencies as input and considering the pathogenic status on potato as the principal factor for selection. The method is based on locus-specific genetic differentiation (FST) outliers to detect candidate markers under selection. We relied the “plot_bayescan” function in R provided with BayeScan to calculate a posterior odds threshold (FDR = 0.05) and on a probability greater than 0.91, as this threshold indicates a strong evidence for selection [64], to select outliers associated with the pathogenicity status of the population. Three analyzes were performed, giving different random initial seed values and only outliers present in all three analyses were kept.

The impact of these genetic variations on protein structure and cellular localization was evaluated to target the variants susceptible to lead to a difference in phenotype [20, 35]. SnpEff 4.3 [65] was used to determine the impact (silent, missense or nonsenses) of the mutation while SignalP 4.1 [66] and Phobius [67] were used to predict the presence of signal peptide cleavage sites and to determine the cellular localization of the proteins.

Validation by qPCR

Expression levels of genes of interest identified during the RNA-seq analysis were validated using qRT-PCR. Six candidate genes were chosen, based on their biological function: RBP-1 (Sequence ID: GROS_g14179.t1), putative effector SPRY domain-containing protein 19 (GROS_g14260.t1 and GROS_g14126.t1), pectate lyase 1 (GROS_g07968.t1), glutathione peroxidase (GROS_g02490.t1) and Peptidase M13 (GROS_g12349.t1). In addition, GR (glutathione reductase), PMP-3 (putative membrane transporter), and aaRS (aminoacyl tRNA synthetase) were used as a set of reference genes to normalized expression data [41]. The transcription of these genes to mRNA was quantified in J2 larvae hatched after exposure to potato root diffusate and tomato root diffusate, a compatible host for all the species under investigation, to determine if different root diffusate can affect the expression of effectors genes.

RNA extraction was performed as mentioned above. First-strand cDNA was synthesized using SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, United States) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, from 0.5 μg of total RNA and using oligo (dT)18. Three replicates were made for each treatment. Each sample was homogenized in supplied lysis buffer with a 6 mm zirconium grinding bead and 200 μL of 1 mm zirconium beads in 2 ml tubes using the PowerLyzer 24 Homogenizer (Qiagen) prior to extraction. Primers were designed using PrimerQuest tool (Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc., Coralville, Iowa, United States) based on the sequences retrieved from the G. rostochiensis transcriptome. Target fragments lengths were designed close to 100 bp. Primer information are listed in Table 5. Reactions were prepared using QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR kit (Qiagen) and amplified on a Mx3000P qPCR System (Agilent Technologies) for 45 cycles in a final volume of 25 μL according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Melting curve analyses were done following the amplification cycles in order to examine the specificity of the reactions. Relative expression analysis was performed using the 2−ΔΔCt method [68]. G. rostochiensis J2 larvae exposed to potato root diffusate was used as calibrator to calculate expression fold changes for all RNA samples.

Table 5 Primer information
Full size table

DNA from each species was also used to confirm the presence, in their respective genome, of seven genes for which transcripts were only observed in PCN species in the RNA-seq data. DNA extraction was performed on dry cyst using DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kits (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instruction and stored at − 20 °C. Each sample was homogenized in supplied lysis buffer with a 6 mm zirconium grinding bead and 200 μL of 1 mm zirconium beads in 2 ml tubes using the PowerLyzer 24 Homogenizer (Qiagen) prior to extraction. Primer design and qPCR amplification were performed as mentioned above.

Availability of data and materials

Sequencing data were submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the accession number SRP146253.

Abbreviations

aaRS:

Aminoacyl tRNA synthetase

DE :

Differential expression

DEG:

Differentially expressed gene

GR:

Glutathione reductase

Indels:

Insertions/Deletions

J2 larvae:

Larvae from the second juvenile stage

log2FC:

Log2 Fold change

P :

P-value

PCN:

Potato cyst nematode

PMP-3:

Putative membrane transporter

PPN:

Plant-parasitic nematode

RIN:

RNA integrity number

SMC:

Structural maintenance of chromosomes

SNP:

Single Nucleotide Polymorphism

References

  1. 1.

    Bird DM, Opperman CH, Davies KG. Interactions between bacteria and plant-parasitic nematodes: now and then. Int J Parasitol. 2003;33(11):1269–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Abad P, Gouzy J, Aury JM, Castagnone-Sereno P, Danchin EG, Deleury E, et al. Genome sequence of the metazoan plant-parasitic nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(8):909–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Decraemer W, Hunt DJ. In: Perry RN, Moens M, editors. Structure and classification. In: Plant nematology. Wallingford: CAB International; 2006. p. 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Quist CW, Smant G, Helder J. Evolution of plant parasitism in the phylum Nematoda. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2015;53:289–310.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Paganini J, Campan-Fournier A, Da Rocha M, Gouret P, Pontarotti P, Wajnberg E, et al. Contribution of lateral gene transfers to the genome composition and parasitic ability of root-knot nematodes. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50875.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Haegeman A, Jones JT, Danchin EG. Horizontal gene transfer in nematodes: a catalyst for plant parasitism? Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2011;24(8):879–87.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Blaxter M, Koutsovoulos G. The evolution of parasitism in Nematoda. Parasitology. 2015;142:26–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Smant G, Helder J, Goverse A. Parallel adaptations and common host cell responses enabling feeding of obligate and facultative plant parasitic nematodes. Plant J. 2018;93(4):686–702.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Danchin EGJ, Rosso M-N, Vieira P, de Almeida-Engler J, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B, et al. Multiple lateral gene transfers and duplications have promoted plant parasitism ability in nematodes. PNAS. 2010;107(41):17651–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Eves-van den Akker S, Birch PR. Opening the effector protein toolbox for plant-parasitic cyst nematode interactions. Mol Plant. 2016;9(11):1451–3.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Varden FA, De la Concepcion JC, Maidment JH, Banfield MJ. Taking the stage: effectors in the spotlight. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2017;38:25–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Anderson JP, Gleason CA, Foley RC, Thrall PH, Burdon JB, Singh KB. Plants versus pathogens: an evolutionary arms race. Funct Plant Biol. 2010;37(6):499–512.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Geric Stare B, Fouville D, Sirca S, Gallot A, Urek G, Grenier E. Molecular variability and evolution of the pectate lyase (pel-2) parasitism gene in cyst nematodes parasitizing different solanaceous plants. J Mol Evol. 2011;72(2):169–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Eves-van den Akker S, Laetsch DR, Thorpe P, Lilley CJ, Danchin EG, Da Rocha M, et al. The genome of the yellow potato cyst nematode, Globodera rostochiensis, reveals insights into the basis of parasitism and virulence. Genome Biol. 2016;17(1):124.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Poppe S, Dorsheimer L, Happel P, Stukenbrock EH. Rapidly evolving genes are key players in host specialization and virulence of the fungal wheat pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici (Mycosphaerella graminicola). PLoS Pathog. 2015;11(7):e1005055.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Alenda C, Montarry J, Grenier E. Human influence on the dispersal and genetic structure of French Globodera tabacum populations. Infect Genet Evol. 2014;27:309–17.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Blanchard A, Esquibet M, Fouville D, Grenier E. Ranbpm homologue genes characterised in the cyst nematodes Globodera pallida and Globodera ‘mexicana’. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2005;67(1):15–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Sobczak M, Golinowski W. In: Jones J, Gheysen G, Fenoll C, editors. Cyst Nematodes and Syncytia. In: Genomics and Molecular Genetics of Plant-Nematode Interactions. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2011. p. 61–82.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Thorpe P, Mantelin S, Cock PJ, Blok VC, Coke MC, Eves-van den Akker S, et al. Genomic characterisation of the effector complement of the potato cyst nematode Globodera pallida. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:923.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Haegeman A, Mantelin S, Jones JT, Gheysen G. Functional roles of effectors of plant-parasitic nematodes. Gene. 2012;492(1):19–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Turner SJ. Population decline of potato cyst nematodes (Globodera rostochiensis, G. pallida) in field soils in Northern Ireland. Ann Appl Biol. 1996;129(2):315–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Den Nijs L, Karssen G. Globodera rostochiensis and Globodera pallida. EPPO Bull. 2004;34(2):309–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Madani M, Ward LJ, De Boer SH. Multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction for identifying potato cyst nematodes, Globodera pallida and Globodera rostochiensis, and the tobacco cyst nematode, Globodera tabacum. Can J Plant Pathol. 2008;30(4):554–64.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Grenier E, Blok VC, Jones JT, Fouville D, Mugniery D. Identification of gene expression differences between Globodera pallida and G. ‘mexicana’ by suppression subtractive hybridization. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2002;3(4):217–26.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Bossis M, Mugniéry D. Specific status of six Globodera parasites of solanaceous plants studied by means of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis with a comparison of gel patterns by a computed system. Fundam Appl Nematol. 1993;16(1):47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Konczal M, Koteja P, Stuglik MT, Radwan J, Babik W. Accuracy of allele frequency estimation using pooled RNA-Seq. Mol Ecol Resour. 2014;14(2):381–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Jones JT, Kumar A, Pylypenko LA, Thirugnanasambandam A, Castelli L, Chapman S, et al. Identification and functional characterization of effectors in expressed sequence tags from various life cycle stages of the potato cyst nematode Globodera pallida. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2009;10(6):815–28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Thorpe P. Bioinformatic and functional characterisation of Globodera pallida effector genes. Ph.D. Thesis. The University of Leeds, Faculty of Biological Sciences; 2012. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/4568/.

  29. 29.

    Eves-van den Akker S, Lilley CJ, Jones JT, Urwin PE. Identification and characterisation of a hyper-variable apoplastic effector gene family of the potato cyst nematodes. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10(9):e1004391.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ali S, Magne M, Chen S, Obradovic N, Jamshaid L, Wang X, et al. Analysis of Globodera rostochiensis effectors reveals conserved functions of SPRYSEC proteins in suppressing and eliciting plant immune responses. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:623.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ali S, Magne M, Chen S, Cote O, Stare BG, Obradovic N, et al. Analysis of putative apoplastic effectors from the nematode, Globodera rostochiensis, and identification of an expansin-like protein that can induce and suppress host defenses. PLoS One. 2015;10(1):e0115042.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Duceppe MO, Lafond-Lapalme J, Palomares-Rius JE, Sabeh M, Blok V, Moffett P, et al. Analysis of survival and hatching transcriptomes from potato cyst nematodes, Globodera rostochiensis and G. pallida. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):3882.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Palomares-Rius JE, Hedley P, Cock PJ, Morris JA, Jones JT, Blok VC. Gene expression changes in diapause or quiescent potato cyst nematode, Globodera pallida, eggs after hydration or exposure to tomato root diffusate. PeerJ. 2016;4:e1654.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Cui JK, Peng H, Qiao F, Wang GF, Huang WK, Wu DQ, et al. Characterization of putative effectors from the cereal cyst nematode Heterodera avenae. Phytopathology. 2018;108(2):264–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Mitchum MG, Hussey RS, Baum TJ, Wang X, Elling AA, Wubben M, et al. Nematode effector proteins: an emerging paradigm of parasitism. New Phytol. 2013;199(4):879–94.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Arendt J, Reznick D. Convergence and parallelism reconsidered: what have we learned about the genetics of adaptation? Trends Ecol Evol. 2008;23(1):26–32.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Chen C, Cui L, Chen Y, Zhang H, Liu P, Wu P, et al. Transcriptional responses of wheat and the cereal cyst nematode Heterodera avenae during their early contact stage. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):14471.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Chronis D, Chen S, Lu S, Hewezi T, Carpenter SC, Loria R, et al. A ubiquitin carboxyl extension protein secreted from a plant-parasitic nematode Globodera rostochiensis is cleaved in planta to promote plant parasitism. Plant J. 2013;74(2):185–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Muoz C, San Francisco J, Gutirrez B, Gonzlez J. Role of the ubiquitin-proteasome systems in the biology and virulence of protozoan parasites. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:13.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Strunnikov AV, Jessberger R. Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) proteins: conserved molecular properties for multiple biological functions. Eur J Biochem. 1999;263(1):6–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Sabeh M, Duceppe MO, St-Arnaud M, Mimee B. Transcriptome-wide selection of a reliable set of reference genes for gene expression studies in potato cyst nematodes (Globodera spp.). PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0193840.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Dagan T, Talmor Y, Graur D. Ratios of radical to conservative amino acid replacement are affected by mutational and compositional factors and may not be indicative of positive Darwinian selection. Mol Biol Evol. 2002;19(7):1022–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Doyle EA, Lambert KN. Meloidogyne javanica chorismate mutase 1 alters plant cell development. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2003;16(2):123–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Djamei A, Schipper K, Rabe F, Ghosh A, Vincon V, Kahnt J, et al. Metabolic priming by a secreted fungal effector. Nature. 2011;478(7369):395–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Bekal S, Niblack TL, Lambert KN. A chorismate mutase from the soybean cyst nematode Heterodera glycines shows polymorphisms that correlate with virulence. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2003;16(5):439–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Fenwick DW. Investigations on the emergence of larvae from cysts of the potato-root eelworm Heterodera rostochiensis; technique and variability. J Helminthol. 1949;23(3–4):157–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with burrows-wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(14):1754–60.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Marchler-Bauer A, Bryant SH. CD-search: protein domain annotations on the fly. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:W327–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Stanke M, Diekhans M, Baertsch R, Haussler D. Using native and syntenically mapped cDNA alignments to improve de novo gene finding. Bioinformatics. 2008;24(5):637–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Geer LY, Marchler-Bauer A, Geer RC, Han L, He J, He S, et al. The NCBI BioSystems database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:D492–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):27–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    The UniProt C. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(D1):D158–D69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Dereeper A, Guignon V, Blanc G, Audic S, Buffet S, Chevenet F, et al. Phylogeny.fr: robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:W465–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(5):1792–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Talavera G, Castresana J. Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Syst Biol. 2007;56(4):564–77.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol. 2010;59(3):307–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Chevenet F, Brun C, Banuls AL, Jacq B, Christen R. TreeDyn: towards dynamic graphics and annotations for analyses of trees. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006;7:439.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Blaxter ML, De Ley P, Garey JR, Liu LX, Scheldeman P, Vierstraete A, et al. A molecular evolutionary framework for the phylum Nematoda. Nature. 1998;392(6671):71–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Davidson NM, Oshlack A. Corset: enabling differential gene expression analysis for de novo assembled transcriptomes. Genome Biol. 2014;15(7):410.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Garrison E, Marth G. Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. arXiv preprint 2012;arXiv:1207.3907.

  63. 63.

    Foll M, Gaggiotti O. A genome-scan method to identify selected loci appropriate for both dominant and codominant markers: a Bayesian perspective. Genetics. 2008;180(2):977–93.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Jeffreys H. The theory of probability. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang le L, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly (Austin). 2012;6(2):80–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods. 2011;8(10):785–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Kall L, Krogh A, Sonnhammer EL. A combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction method. J Mol Biol. 2004;338(5):1027–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Guy Bélair (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada), Geert Smant (Wageningen University and Research Centre) and Gerrit Karssen (Wageningen University and Research Centre) for providing us with isolates of cyst nematodes.

Funding

This work was funded by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) through a Coordinated Agricultural Project (CAP) titled “Risk Assessment and Eradication of Globodera spp. in U.S. Production of Potato,” supported by award #2015–69004-23634 from the National Institute for Food and Agriculture (https://www.globodera.org/). These funding bodies played no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. St-Jean-sur-Richelieu Research and Development Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, St-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Quebec, Canada

    Michael Sabeh, Etienne Lord & Benjamin Mimee

  2. Biodiversity Center, Institut de recherche en biologie végétale, Université de Montréal and Jardin botanique de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

    Michael Sabeh & Marc St-Arnaud

  3. INRA, UMR1349 IGEPP (Institute of Genetics, Environment and Plant Protection), F-35653, Le Rheu, France

    Éric Grenier

Authors
  1. Michael Sabeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Etienne Lord
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Éric Grenier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marc St-Arnaud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Benjamin Mimee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MS, MSA, and BM conceived and designed all experiments; MS performed experiments; MS and EL performed bio-informatics analysis; BM contributed to materials/analysis tools; BM and EG contributed to biological material acquisition; All authors discussed the results; MS wrote the manuscript with contributions from BM, EG and MSA. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Mimee.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional files

Additional file 1:

Figure S1. Genetic similarities of four Globodera species compared to Caenorhabditis elegans. Phylogenetic tree of the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequences from Globodera rostochiensis, G. pallida, G. mexicana, G. tabacum and C. elegans. Analysis was performed using Phylogeny.fr, bootstrap values (*) are given next to the nodes. (PNG 15 kb)

Additional file 2:

Table S1. Differentially expressed genes (DEG, P < 0.01) between PCN (Globodera rostochiensis, G. pallida) and non-PCN species (G. tabacum, G. mexicana); * mark known effector genes. SeqID and Gene description corresponds to sequences ID and annotation of G. rostochiensis reference transcriptome (nGr.v1.1). (XLSX 55 kb)

Additional file 3:

Table S2. Homozygous non-synonymous predicted variants in non-PCN populations that were located on a loci under selection; * mark known effector genes. SeqID and Gene description corresponds to sequences ID and annotation of G. rostochiensis reference transcriptome (nGr.v1.1). (XLSX 53 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sabeh, M., Lord, E., Grenier, É. et al. What determines host specificity in hyperspecialized plant parasitic nematodes?. BMC Genomics 20, 457 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5853-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Plant-parasitic nematode
  • Globodera
  • Transcriptomic study
  • RNA-seq
  • Pathogenicity
  • Effectors
  • Host range

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us