Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

First insight into the whole-genome sequence variations in Mycobacterium bovis BCG-1 (Russia) vaccine seed lots and their progeny clinical isolates from children with BCG-induced adverse events

BMC Genomics volume 21, Article number: 567 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The only licensed live Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine used to prevent severe childhood tuberculosis comprises genetically divergent strains with variable protective efficacy and rates of BCG-induced adverse events. The whole-genome sequencing (WGS) allowed evaluating the genome stability of BCG strains and the impact of spontaneous heterogeneity in seed and commercial lots on the efficacy of BCG-vaccines in different countries. Our study aimed to assess sequence variations and their putative effects on genes and protein functions in the BCG-1 (Russia) seed lots compared to their progeny isolates available from immunocompetent children with BCG-induced disease (mainly, osteitis).

Results

Based on the WGS data, we analyzed the links between seed lots 361, 367, and 368 used for vaccine manufacture in Russia in different periods, and their nine progeny isolates recovered from immunocompetent children with BCG-induced disease. The complete catalog of variants in genes relative to the reference genome (GenBank: CP013741) included 4 synonymous and 8 nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms, and 3 frameshift deletions. Seed lot 361 shared variants with 2 of 6 descendant isolates that had higher proportions of such polymorphisms in several genes, including ppsC, eccD5, and eccA5 involved in metabolism and cell wall processes and reportedly associated with virulence in mycobacteria. One isolate preserved variants of its parent seed lot 361 without gain of further changes in the sequence profile within 14 years.

Conclusions

The background genomic information allowed us for the first time to follow the BCG diversity starting from the freeze-dried seed lots to descendant clinical isolates. Sequence variations in several genes of seed lot 361 did not alter the genomic stability and viability of the vaccine and appeared accumulated in isolates during the survival in the human organism. The impact of the observed variations in the context of association with the development of BCG-induced disease should be evaluated in parallel with the immune status and host genetics. Comparative genomic studies of BCG seed lots and their descendant clinical isolates represent a beneficial approach to better understand the molecular bases of efficacy and adverse events during the long-term survival of BCG in the host organism.

Background

Treatment of tuberculosis (TB) and vaccination remain inevitable health-care interventions to prevent new Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections and their progression to disease. The live Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine is the only licensed vaccine that is successfully used for nearly a century to prevent childhood TB, although it shows a modest protective effect in adults [1, 2]. The history of BCG development and spreading was thoroughly reviewed [3, 4]. Briefly, the ancestral form of BCG was derived from wild-type Mycobacterium bovis progenitor strain, while attenuation by numerous in vitro passages resulted in world distribution of parental BCG strain in 1924. During the next decades, maintenance of the BCG strain progenies by further passages using different culture media and transfer schedules in different countries contributed to the in vitro evolution of BCG. The production of seed stocks without lyophilization until the 1960s resulted in the generation of BCG daughter strains (sub-strains) with variable morphological, culture, antigenic characteristics, and residual virulence due to adaptation in vitro [3,4,5,6,7].

The up-to-date genealogy of widely used BCG vaccine strains is based on genomic variations that occurred due to large deletions, tandem duplications, insertion sequences, and the subsequent series of insertions/deletions and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Accordingly, BCG strains were classified into “early” strains represented by BCG Japan, Moreau, Russia (and the descendant BCG Sofia) strains that show fewer chromosomal deletions than “late” strains - Danish, Pasteur, Glaxo, and others [8,9,10,11]. Altogether, these variations underpin the molecular basis of attenuation, different levels of gene expression of immunodominant proteins leading to variable protective efficacy, and different rates of adverse events of currently used genetically divergent BCG strains otherwise considered different BCG vaccines [3, 8].

Historically, the original M. bovis BCG strain was transferred to Russia in 1924, and since 1925 it was referred to as M. bovis BCG-1 (also spelled as BCG-I). In the 1940s, M. bovis BCG-1 was lyophilized, and in 1954 the seed lot system was adopted in Russia. The first seed lot used in 1963 for the manufacturing of freeze-dried BCG vaccines in the former Soviet Union was seed lot 352 (“ch”). Since 2006, the 368 (“shch”) generation of M. bovis BCG-1 (Russia) strain no. 700001 is in use for the production of the BCG vaccine in Russia [12, 13]. The same BCG generation 368 is also adopted by two manufacturers in India for vaccine production and distribution worldwide under the name “BCG Russia 368” [14].

The attenuated BCG vaccines are believed safe and effective mainly to prevent the most severe meningitis and miliary forms of childhood TB associated with high mortality in infants and young children, especially in high TB-burden countries [1, 2]. However, adverse events following immunization with BCG in 1–10% of vaccinees are likely to be substantially underreported since assays to confirm isolates as BCG are still relatively rare [15,16,17,18,19,20] despite the advent of molecular techniques and commercially available kits for BCG identification [21]. In Russia, the estimated frequency of complications per 100,000 BCG-immunized decreased from 35.3 in 2005 to 11.2 in 2013 [22].

Vaccine-related complications, i.e., BCG-induced disease (BCG-ID), may occur later than 12 months after vaccination as local site reactions or distal to the site of inoculation, and they appear to differ from cutaneous lesions, lymphadenopathy/lymphadenitis, and hypersensitivity reactions to osteitis and disseminated BCG infections (almost exclusively in individuals with compromised cellular immunity) [1, 16, 19, 23,24,25].

The BCG-induced adverse reactions are believed to be due to the use of genetically distant vaccine strains with variable residual virulence, the culture technique, the route of administration and the dose of viable cells in the BCG vaccine delivered, along with the age, immune status, and host genetics of the vaccinees [4, 8, 9, 16, 17, 26, 27].

To standardize the vaccine production and to prevent adverse reactions related to BCG vaccination, the WHO has established the international requirements for the manufacture and quality control including genetic characterization of seeds and final commercial lots of the reference strains, i.e., BCG Danish 1331, Tokyo 172–1, and Russia BCG-1 used for vaccine manufacture and distribution worldwide [11, 28, 29].

Given recommendations, the identity and genome stability of seven seed lots of M. bovis BCG-1 (Russia) used for immunization against TB in Russia since 1948 till present, and 32 commercial lots of the vaccine produced by Russian manufacturers were proved by multiplex polymerase chain reaction [12].

During the last decades, the whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was applied to assess the genome stability of BCG vaccine strains from different culture collections and to evaluate the impact of minor sequence variations occurring in seed and commercial lots on the efficacy of BCG-vaccines used in different countries [30,31,32,33,34]. Recently, sequence variations were identified in clinical isolates from two infants with BCG-induced disease compared with the sub-cultured M. bovis BCG Moscow strain (Serum Institute of India, India) in South Africa [15].

The complete genome sequences of the current M. bovis BCG-1 (Russia) 368 (“shch”) freeze-dried seed lot and its working seed lot used for vaccine production by one of the Russian manufacturers are available in GenBank (NCBI) under accession numbers CP011455 [13], CP009243 [35], and CP013741 [36]. The genome constancy of M. bovis BCG-1 (Russia) 368 within the entire vaccine production flow (from working seed lot, the last production passage to final vaccine product) was confirmed by spoligotyping, 24 loci VNTR-typing, and WGS [36, 37]. However, so far, there is a lack of data on the contribution of BCG genomic diversity to the viability, fitness, and residual virulence of vaccine populations in vivo in the context of the development of BCG-induced adverse events. Therefore, our study aimed to assess sequence variations and their putative effects on genes and protein functions in the BCG-1 (Russia) seed lots compared to their progeny clinical isolates available from immunocompetent children with BCG-induced osteitis and lymphadenitis.

Results

Sequence variations identified in BCG-1 (Russia) parent seed lots and their progeny clinical isolates

Raw reads of seed lots 361, 367, 368, and descendant clinical isolates were mapped to the reference genome of BCG-1 (Russia) (GenBank: CP013741). Variant calling allowed to produce the complete catalog of 15 differences, including 12 SNPs (four synonymous and eight nonsynonymous) and three disruptive deletions (frameshift variants) in CDS of the seed lots and clinical isolates relative to the reference genome. Overview of sequence variation patterns identified in BCG seed lots and their progeny clinical isolates are presented in Table 1, Additional Files 1 and 2.

Table 1 Sequence variants in CDS of BCG-1 (Russia) parent seed lots 361, 367 and 368 and their progeny clinical isolates compared to the reference sequence BCG-1 (Russia) (GenBank: CP013741)
Full size table

His57Asp mutation in pncA (Rv2043c) gene conferring high intrinsic resistance to pyrazinamide in M. bovis was detected in all BCG-1 (Russia) progeny isolates. A single-nucleotide insertion in the recA gene was not detected in any of three seed lots, nor their descendant clinical isolates.

Comparative analysis of sequence variants in BCG-1 (Russia) seed lots and their progeny clinical isolates

We examined a set of nine BCG-1 (Russia) clinical isolates recovered from duly BCG-vaccinated immunocompetent children (except one, immunized with delay for 4 months after birth) with a culture-confirmed diagnosis of BCG-ID. For each case, analysis of medical records allowed to follow the history of primary BCG vaccination, including information on commercial vaccine products used for intradermal inoculation, its manufacture, and finally, the parent seed lot (Tables 2 and 3).

Table 2 Characteristics of patients and M. bovis BCG-1 (Russia) clinical isolates
Full size table
Table 3 Seed lots of M. bovis BCG-1 (Russia) substrain No. 700001
Full size table

BCG clinical isolates shared the majority of genomic features with their parent seed lots. However, the proportions of reads with alternative alleles varied in BCG seed lots, and their progeny isolates. These findings were summarized in Table 1 and Additional file 1. Based on the comparative analyses of the data obtained, we built a schematic view of the relationships between BCG seed lots and their descendant clinical isolates (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic view of relationships between vaccine strain BCG-1 (Russia) parent seed lots, commercial vaccine lots, and their progeny clinical strains. Rectangle boxes correspond to the original seed lots with dates of lyophilization shown in parentheses. Rectangle shadowed boxes depict the sequenced seed lots (dates of lyophilization shown in parentheses). Dashed circles show commercial vaccine lots (were not available for sequencing) used for immunization with dates of inoculation in parentheses. Square boxes mark sequenced BCG clinical isolates (dates of BCG culture isolation shown in parentheses). Gray-scale small boxes depict sequence variants in genes related to particular proteins (proportions shown in parentheses) in seed lots 361, 367, 368, and their progeny clinical isolates. See Table 1 for more details

Full size image

The population of BCG-1 (Russia) seed lot 361 was polymorphic with variable proportions of SNPs and deletions in reads spanning seven CDS (Table 1, Fig. 1, Additional file 1).

Synonymous SNP in the ornithine aminotransferase gene (rocD) was detected in almost 1/3 reads of seed lot 361, but it was absent in the descendant isolates. Alternatively, seed lot 361 shared nonsynonymous (missense) SNPs in type VII secretion system ESX-5 (eccD5 and eccA5), dolichol-phosphate mannosyltransferase (ppm1) and hypothetical protease genes with its progeny clinical isolates 2925 and 5448 that had higher proportions (up to 100%) of alternative variants. However, sequences of these isolates differed in amino acid transporter (cycA) and polyketide synthase (ppsC) genes. A nonsynonymous SNP in the PE-PGRS family protein PE_PGRS7 gene was found in 38% reads of isolate 5340, the progeny of seed lot 361.

Isolates 1986, 4159, and 5075, progenies of the seed lot 361, and seed lot 367 did not show sequence polymorphisms compared to the reference sequence, i.e., BCG-1 (Russia) current seed lot 368 (Table 1, Additional file 1).

Isolate 3363, a single progeny of the seed lot 367, carried a missense variant in amidase (amiD) gene and a frameshift deletion in the thioesterase (pks13) gene (Table 1, Fig. 1, Additional file 1).

The sequenced seed lot 368 shared a single base deletion in methionine aminopeptidase (mapA) with descendant isolate 577, also demonstrating a polymorphism (43% reads) in the ATP synthase subunit beta gene (atpD). Polymorphism in the N-acetylglucosaminyl-diphospho-decaprenol L-rhamnosyltransferase gene (wbbL1) and a frameshift deletion in the universal stress protein UspA gene were identified in clinical isolate 1032 (18 and 28% reads, respectively), the progeny of seed lot 368 (Table 1, Fig. 1; Additional file 1 and 3).

Discussion

All nine BCG clinical isolates recovered from tissue samples taken during the surgery were susceptible to first-line antibiotics: streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampin, ethambutol. However, they were pyrazinamide-resistant due to the typical His57Asp mutation in pncA (Rv2043c) gene conferring high intrinsic resistance in M. bovis, and consequently, all BCG vaccine strains [38].

Previously, spontaneous heterogeneity of BCG seed lots and commercial vaccines during vaccine production determined by variant calling was analyzed in the Tokyo-172 vaccine strain [32]. In line with the published data, we observed a synonymous A2139G single nucleotide base substitution (position 3,175,529, “-” chain) in BOVR_15,090, i.e., the glnD (ortholog Rv2918c in M. tuberculosis H37Rv) gene, without Ala replacement in position 713 of 808 amino acids in the conservative domain of the PII uridylyltransferase protein in all genomes studied. The G variant was present in 100% reads of sequenced seed lots 361 and 367, and eight of nine clinical isolates. However, it was detected only in 25% reads of current seed lot 368 (sequenced in this study), and 46% reads of its progeny isolate 577.

These findings inspired further examination of A/G polymorphisms in the glnD in other sequenced BCG genomes.

The G variant was previously reported in the glnD in BCG-1 (Russia) current seed lot 368 and some earlier vaccine products [35], though alternative variant A was detected in two other BCG-1 (Russia) 368 complete genomes [13, 36]. The stability of variant A in the glnD gene of the BCG-1 (Russia) 368 working seed lot (GenBank: CP013741) and consistent vaccine batches within 2 years was confirmed by WGS [36, 37]. Noteworthy, all three complete genomes of BCG-1 (Russia) were sequenced independently from the same generation 368 (“shch”), which is still in use since 2008 for the BCG vaccine production by two Russian manufactures: Medgamal (Moscow) and Microgen (Stavropol).

Interestingly, allele G was recorded in the genomes of BCG str. Tokyo 172 which represents a well-defined Type I subpopulation of BCG Tokyo-172, the closest to BCG Russia (GenBank: NZ_CUWO01000001) and Russia ATCC 35740, members of presumably monophyletic “early” substrain group of BCG [10, 30, 32]. The G variant was also common in the reference sequences of some other BCG strains, e.g., Pasteur 1173P2, Danish 1331, ATCC 35743 (Tice), Moreau RDJ, used worldwide for vaccine production and research purposes.

Altogether, these data suggest that intrinsic polymorphism in the glnD gene of BCG-1 (Russia) strain represented by different seed lots and descendant clinical isolates occurs due to the selection of variants during laboratory and vaccine production manipulations, rather than mutations in patients’ organisms. Otherwise, the observed heterogeneity can be partly explained as a result of processing nucleotide variants among the mapped reads using different bioinformatics tools and quality criteria.

Another interesting finding: a notorious single-nucleotide insertion in the recA gene leading to nonfunctional truncated recombinase A reported previously in a vaccine production lot of M. bovis BCG Russia (corresponding to ATCC 35740) [39] was not detected in seed lots studied, nor their descendant clinical isolates. De facto, there were no alterations in recA in the previously sequenced complete genomes of BCG-1 (Russia) [13, 35, 36] along with other hyperconserved BCG strains [33].

Based on the comparative study of WGS data, we attempted to analyze the links between BCG-1 (Russia) seed lots used for vaccine manufacture and their progeny clinical isolates associated with specific adverse events, e.g., BCG-osteitis and an abscess at the point of injection.

The population of BCG-1 (Russia) seed lot 361 appeared heterogeneous with variable proportions of SNPs and deletions in reads spanning seven CDS. Seed lot 361 shared SNPs in eccD5, eccA5, ppm1 genes, and hypothetical protease gene with its progeny clinical isolates 2925 and 5448. The latter typically had higher proportions (reaching up to 100%) of alternative alleles than the parent seed lot 361, thus suggesting the likely accumulation of such changes under selective pressure in the host organism. The similar SNPs we observed in corresponding genomic positions in M. tuberculosis H37Rv, BCG strains Tokyo-172 type I and Pasteur 1173P2. These polymorphisms affected type VII specialized bacterial secretion ESX-5 (integral membrane protein EccD and secretion AAA-ATPase), reportedly associated with virulence in mycobacteria, and dolichol-phosphate mannosyltransferase and protease genes involved in the vital cell processes (protein modification, lipoprotein biosynthesis), intermediary metabolism, and respiration [8, 40, 41]. The data obtained confirmed the close genetic relatedness between seed lot 361 and both progeny isolates 2925 and 5448 that otherwise differed from each other in amino acid transporter (cycA) and polyketide synthase (ppsC) sequences.

A unique missense variant in the PE-PGRS family protein PE_PGRS7 gene with an unclear function in antigenic variation and interactions of bacteria with the host immune system was found in 38% reads of isolate 5340, the progeny of seed lot 361.

Interestingly, no sequence polymorphisms (except glnD) were detected in isolates 1986, 4159, and 5075, progenies of the seed lot 361 (used for BCG manufacture in 2002–2007) compared to the reference sequence, i.e., BCG-1 (Russia) current seed lot 368.

The sequences of seed lot 367 (used for vaccine production in 2001–2008) also did not show variations in 14 of 15 CDS compared to the reference genome and thus appeared the most conservative in our study. However, its single progeny, isolate 3363, carried a missense variant in amidase (amiD) gene essential for protein translation and required for mycobacterial survival during infection (virulence factor) and a frameshift deletion in the thioesterase region of polyketide synthase 13 (pks13) gene involved in the final assembly of mycolic acids, major and specific lipid components of the envelope essential for the survival of a mycobacterial cell [40, 42].

The population of the sequenced seed lot 368 was almost homogenous containing a single base deletion (69% reads) in methionine aminopeptidase (mapA) gene compared to the previously reported complete genomes of BCG-1 (Russia) current-generation 368 [13, 35, 36] and BCG Tokyo 172 type 1 [32]. This frameshift leading to protein truncation was inherited in the descendant isolate 577 (47% reads), also bearing an isolate-specific allele (43% reads) in the ATP synthase subunit beta gene (atpD). Both proteins encoded by mapA and atpD genes are involved in the processes of intermediary metabolism and respiration [8].

A synonymous SNP in the N-acetylglucosaminyl-diphospho-decaprenol L-rhamnosyltransferase gene (wbbL1) not altering the enzyme structure and function in the cell wall and cell processes was identified in clinical isolate 1032 (18% reads). Another finding in isolate 1032 (28% reads) was a frameshift due to a single-base cytosine deletion in codon 630 of the universal stress protein UspA gene (orthologue Rv1996 in M. tuberculosis H37Rv), one of eight Usp paralogues essential for the intracellular survival of pathogenic mycobacteria in hypoxia, low levels of nitric oxide and carbon monoxide environment. This deletion completely altering 27 amino acids from the position 212 onwards resulted in a gained opal stop codon (TGA). The latter was leading to a premature protein truncation in the residue 239 yielding to the loss of 3 ligand-binding loci in the putative ATP binding motif of the UspA domain 2 [43].

It appears that the accumulation of shared SNPs and unique variations occurred in clinical isolates 577 and 1032 (both progenies of the sequenced seed lot 368), 3363 (progeny of seed lot 367), and 5340 (progeny of seed lot 361) did not affect the vaccine survival in the organisms of vaccinees. Moreover, none of the frameshifts, which presumably could alter essential cell functions, were crucial for the microbial population in vitro, nor in vivo, thus emphasizing the long-term viability of BCG-1 (Russia) strain in the human organism.

Adverse events following immunization with BCG are considered underreported since assays to confirm isolates as BCG are still relatively rare. Moreover, based on the routine laboratory diagnostics and even molecular techniques, it is difficult to associate the clinical BCG isolates with the particular vaccine lot administered [15,16,17,18,19,20]. Therefore, the contribution of BCG genomic heterogeneity to the viability and residual virulence of vaccine populations in vivo remains unclear in terms of the development of BCG-related disease that otherwise can be associated with immune responses and human genetics.

Unfortunately, the administered commercial vaccines were unavailable for WGS, which limited the comparative analysis of sequence variations through the whole vaccine production chain. Nevertheless, bioinformatics tools provided a possibility to identify sequence variants and their putative effects on genes and protein functions in BCG-1(Russia) seed lots 361 and 368 used for vaccine manufacture in Russia in different periods relative to their progeny clinical isolates from patients with confirmed BCG-related disease and the genomes of internationally recognized BCG reference strains.

BCG osteitis is a rare but severe adverse event that typically presents in children before the age of 5 years, and there are few reports concerning the late onset of the disease in teenagers [17, 19]. In our setting, we analyzed confirmed cases of BCG–osteitis typically developed at the age under 5 years (median 22 months) among immunocompetent children immunized with BCG-1 (Russia) vaccine after, or soon after birth. The latest onset of the osteitis affecting the left eighth rib was diagnosed in the patient aged 14 years who once received as a newborn the BCG vaccine derived from the seed lot 361. The isolate 2925 recovered from tissue samples taken during surgery accumulated four nonsynonymous and one synonymous SNPs assigned to its parent seed lot 361 but did not gain any further sequence variants in the patient’s organism. Noteworthy, such a prolonged period of survival in a human organism of the life BCG vaccine without significant changes in its genome appears remarkable.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, we reported for the first time the results of a WGS-based comparative analysis of the BCG-1 (Russia) seed lots used for the vaccine production in different periods and their progeny clinical isolates recovered from immunocompetent children with BCG-induced adverse reactions (mainly, BCG osteitis). Our study provided the background genomic information, which allowed us to follow the BCG diversity starting from the freeze-dried seed lots to descendant clinical isolates presenting the results of the long-term survival of vaccine populations in the human organism.

Two of three BCG-1 (Russia) seed lots were heterogeneous with various proportions of sequence variants in several genes, including ppsC, eccD5, and eccA5 involved in metabolism and cell wall processes and reportedly associated with virulence in mycobacteria. However, such polymorphisms did not alter the genomic stability and viability of BCG-1 (Russia)-derived vaccines in vivo. Sequence variants occurred in polymorphic CDS of seed lot 361 used for vaccine manufacture before 2006 appeared accumulated in two of six progeny isolates, hypothetically, under selective pressure in the human organism. Although polymorphisms were identified in two unrelated clinical isolates 2925 and 5448 from children immunized in different years with different vaccine lots produced from the BCG-1 (Russia) seed lot 361 by the same manufacturer, the impact of such changes in the context of association with the development of BCG-induced disease remains questionable due to the lack of detailed information on the immune status and host genetics of presumably immunocompetent patients with BCG-osteitis.

Despite promising results in the development of a new generation of BCG vaccines, there is no reliable alternative to those which are still in use in the nearest future.

The contributions of genomic diversity and variations in gene expression profiles during the BCG vaccine manufacture flow and adaptations in vivo are yet to be uncovered in parallel with the molecular mechanisms of innate and adaptive immune responses in the human organism. Thereby, the comparative studies of genomic variations in production strains, their seeds, administered vaccine lots, and the descendant clinical isolates (if available) represent a beneficial approach to better understand the bases of vaccine efficacy and adverse reactions of present and future BCG-based vaccines at genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic levels.

Methods

Study design

We retrospectively reviewed 65 medical records at the clinics of St. Petersburg Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology selected as codes A18.0 (Tuberculosis of bones and joints, acute or chronic osteomyelitis) and A18.2 (Tuberculosis peripheral lymphadenopathy) according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10). The probable BCG-ID was suspected in nine immunocompetent children (eight patients aged under 5 years and the 14-year old patient) with developed osteitis (eight patients), or cutaneous lesion near the BCG inoculation site (one patient), well-defined BCG inoculation records, and without a history of TB contacts admitted for treatment (including surgical intervention) in 2006–2018 (Table 2).

Inclusion criteria

The definition for the diagnosis of BCG-ID (“BCG-itis”) included 1) the histology showing granulation tissue with caseous necrosis in biopsy samples taken while surgery and 2) mycobacteria cultures recovered from tissue samples on the Löwenstein-Jensen (L-J) medium if they were identified as M. bovis BCG using GenoType MTBC (Hain Lifescience, Germany). The M. bovis BCG cultures were stored at − 80 °C for further examination.

Drug susceptibility testing

Drug susceptibility to first-line antibiotics (streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampin, ethambutol) and pyrazinamide of the M. bovis BCG cultures was assessed by using conventional absolute concentration method and/or BACTEC MGIT 960 System (Becton-Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA).

BCG-1 (Russia) seed lots and clinical isolates used for WGS

For genomic analysis, we used genomic DNA extracted as described [44] from M. bovis BCG-1 (Russia) freeze-dried seed lots and nine BCG clinical isolates cultured on L-J medium, each recovered from a child patient with confirmed BCG-ID.

The lyophilized seed lots of three generations 361 (“sh”), 367 (“shch”), and 368 (“shch”) of M. bovis BCG-1 (Russia) substrain No. 700001 in ampoules were obtained from the National State Collection of Pathogenic Microorganisms (NSCPM) of Scientific Center for Expertise of Medical Application Products of the Ministry of Health, Russia along with the characteristics (the origin and manufacture) of corresponding BCG vaccine commercial lots used for immunization (Table 3).

Clinical isolates 1986, 2925, 4159, 5340, 5075, and 5448 - progenies of BCG-1 (Russia) seed lot 361 (“sh”), isolate 3363 – of seed lot 367 (“shch”) and isolate 1032 – of seed lot 368 (“shch”) were obtained from biopsies of patients with BCG-osteitis affecting femur, tibia, calcaneus or ribs; isolate 577 – the progeny of seed lot 368 (“shch”) was obtained from a patient with an abscess at the point of injection (Tables 2 and 3).

Library construction and DNA sequencing bioinformatics analysis

DNA samples were purified by RNase A (Thermo Scientific™ #EN0531) and sonicated using Bioruptor® UCD-200 system (Diagenode, Denville, NJ, USA) to prepare paired-end (P.E.) libraries by following NEB Library Preparation Protocol, as seen in the product manual for the NEBNext Ultra II DNA Library Preparation Kit for Illumina (NEB #E7645). P.E. genomic libraries were subjected to WGS performed using the MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The average coverage of 28x was achieved. Raw PE reads were qualitatively analyzed using FastQC software (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/) to retrieve proper parameters for trimming and filtering with Trimmomatic software version 0.32 [45]. Trimmed reads were aligned to the initially indexed reference genome of M. bovis BCG-1 (Russia), available at NCBI GenBank under the accession number CP013741 (RefSeq: NZ_CP013741.1) using BWA-MEM algorithm [46]. Sequence alignment maps were subsequently sorted by coordinates with conversion to binary alignment maps, deduplicated and indexed using Picard software version 2.17.8 (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/) SortSam, MarkDuplicates, and BuildBamIndex tools, respectively. Next, deduplicated reads were subjected to the realignment based on the realignment target list performed with the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) software version 4.1.1.0 IndelRealigner tool [47]. Realigned reads were used for variant identification using the GATK version 4.1.1.0 HaplotypeCaller tool. Identified variants were selected to generate separate SNPs- and indels-containing variant call format (VCF) files using the GATK version 4.1.1.0 SelectVariants tool. SNPs and indels then were processed with the GATK version 4.1.1.0 VariantFiltration tool according to the following parameters such that SNPs with the quality per depth (Q.D.) less than 2.0, Fisher strand bias (F.S.) more than 60.0, strand odds ratio (SOR) more than 4.0, root mean square mapping quality (M.Q.) less than 40.0, mapping quality rank-sum test (MQRankSum) less than − 12.5, read position rank-sum test (ReadPosRankSum) less than − 8.0 and indels with Q.D. < 2.0, F.S. > 200.0, ReadPosRankSum < − 20.0, SOR > 10.0 were filtered out. Next, realigned reads were subjected to the base quality score recalibration (BQSR) stage using the GATK version 4.1.1.0 BaseRecalibrator and PrintReads tools to model systematic sequencing technical errors, adjust base quality scores accordingly basing on filtered VCF files and generate recalibrated reads, which improves the accuracy of variant calls. Recalibrated reads were used for adjusted variant identification using the GATK version 4.1.1.0 HaplotypeCaller tool. Identified variants were selected to generate separate SNPs- and indels-containing variant call format (VCF) files using the GATK version 4.1.1.0 SelectVariants tool. SNPs and indels were then processed with the GATK version 4.1.1.0 VariantFiltration tool, as described above. Effects on genes and putative impact (modifier, low, moderate, high) of identified variants were predicted using SnpEff software version 4.3 T [48] basing on annotations retrieved from general feature format version 3 (GFF3) file of M. bovis BCG-1 (Russia) current seed lot 368 (“shch”) available at NCBI under the accession number CP013741. Particular genome features were retrieved from the PATRIC platform 3.6.2 (https://www.patricbrc.org/view/Taxonomy/1763) [49], UniProt (https://www.uniprot.org/) [50], and MycoBrowser portal (https://mycobrowser.epfl.ch) [51].

The pncA gene was searched for mutations conferring resistance to pyrazinamide in BCG clinical isolates [38].

Comparative genomic analysis

Reference genomic sequences of M. tuberculosis H37Rv (NC_000962.3) and M. bovis BCG strains: BCG-1 (Russia) (NZ_CP013741; NZ_CP011455; NZ_CP009243), Tokyo-172 type I (NC_012207), Pasteur 1173P2 (NC_008769), BCG Russia (NZ_CUWO01000001), and Danish 1331 (NZ_CP039850) were used to analyze variations in coding DNA sequences (CDS) by the NCBI basic local alignment and search tool (BLAST) (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi)

Availability of data and materials

Raw sequencing data of BCG-1 (Russia) seed lots 361, 367, and 368 (accession numbers: SRR9593176, SRR9593167, SRR9593166), and nine BCG clinical isolates (accession numbers: SRR9593177, SRR9593172, SRR9593171, SRR9593170, SRR9593169, SRR9593168, SRR9593175, SRR9593174, SRR9593173) are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra) related to the BioProject “Whole-genome sequence variation of Mycobacterium bovis BCG-I (Russia) vaccine substrain” (Accession: PRJNA523499). Reference genomic sequences of M. tuberculosis H37Rv (NC_000962.3) and M. bovis BCG strains BCG-1 (Russia) (CP013741, NZ_CP013741; NZ_CP011455; NZ_CP009243), Tokyo-172 type I (NC_012207), Pasteur 1173P2 (NC_008769), BCG Russia (NZ_CUWO01000001), and Danish strain 1331 (NZ_CP039850) are available at GenBank NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/). All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article, in particular, in the Methods section (subsection Comparative genomic analysis) and Tables 2 and 3.

Abbreviations

BCG:

Bacille Calmette-Guérin

TB:

Tuberculosis

SNP:

Single nucleotide polymorphisms

BCG-ID:

BCG-induced disease

WGS:

Whole-genome sequencing

CDS:

Coding DNA sequences

References

  1. World Health Organization. Weekly Epidemiological Record. 2018;93(08):73–96. https://www.who.int/wer/2018/wer9308/en/. Accessed 13 Aug 2020.

  2. Trunz BB, Fine P, Dye C. Effect of BCG vaccination on childhood tuberculous meningitis and miliary tuberculosis worldwide: a meta-analysis and assessment of cost-effectiveness. Lancet. 2006;367:1173–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68507-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Behr MA. BCG - Different strains, different vaccines? Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;2:86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(02)00182-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leung AS, Tran V, Wu Z, Yu X, Alexander DC, Gao GF, et al. Novel genome polymorphisms in BCG vaccine strains and impact on efficacy. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:413. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-413.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Mostowy S, Tsolaki AG, Small PM, Behr MA. The in vitro evolution of BCG vaccines. Vaccine. 2003;21:4270–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00484-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Seki M, Udagawa T, Sugawara I, Iwama K, Honda I, Fujita I, et al. The effect of passages during Japanese BCG vaccine production on genetic stability and protective efficacy. Vaccine. 2012;30:1460–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang L, Ru HW, Chen FZ, Jin CY, Sun RF, Fan XY, et al. Variable virulence and efficacy of BCG vaccine strains in mice and correlation with genome polymorphisms. Mol Ther. 2016;24:398–405. https://doi.org/10.1038/mt.2015.216.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Brosch R, Gordon SV, Garnier T, Eiglmeier K, Frigui W, Valenti P, et al. Genome plasticity of BCG and impact on vaccine efficacy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(13):5596–601. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0700869104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ritz N, Curtis N. Mapping the global use of different BCG vaccine strains. Tuberculosis. 2009;89:248–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tube.2009.03.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Abdallah AM, Hill-Cawthorne GA, Otto TD, Coll F, Guerra-Assunção JA, Gao G, et al. Genomic expression catalogue of a global collection of BCG vaccine strains show evidence for highly diverged metabolic and cell-wall adaptations. Sci Rep. 2015;5:15443. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15443.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Stefanova T. Quality control and safety assessment of BCG vaccines in the post-genomic era. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2014;28:387–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2014.927200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Levi DT, Obukhov YI, Aleksandrova NV, Volkova RA, Elbert EV, Alvarez Figeroa MV, et al. Identity and stability assessment of BCG vaccine by multiplex PCR. BIOpreparations. Prev Diagn Treat. 2016;16(1):49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ludannyy R, Alvarez Figueroa M, Levi D, Markelov M, Dedkov V, Aleksandrova N, et al. Whole-genome sequence of Mycobacterium bovis BCG-1 (Russia). Genome Announc. 2015;3(6):e01320–15. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.01320-15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Cernuschi T, Malvolti S, Nickels E, Friede M. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine: a global assessment of demand and supply balance. Vaccine. 2018;36:498–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.12.010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Modipane L, Reva O, Magazi BT, Antiabong JF, Osei Sekyere J, Mbelle NM. Phylogenomic and epidemiological insights into two clinical Mycobacterium bovis BCG strains circulating in South Africa. Int J Infect Dis. 2019;87:32–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2019.08.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Venkataraman A, Yusuff M, Liebeschuetz S, Riddell A, Prendergast AJ. Management and outcome of Bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccine adverse reactions. Vaccine. 2015;33:5470–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.07.103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Rermruay R, Rungmaitree S, Chatpornvorarux S, Brukesawan C, Wittawatmongkol O, Lapphra K, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-induced diseases following neonatal BCG Tokyo-172 strain immunization. Vaccine. 2018;36(28):4046–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.05.098.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jou R, Huang WL, Su WJ. Tokyo-172 BCG vaccination complications, Taiwan. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15(9):1525–6. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1509.081336.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin WL, Chiu NC, Lee PH, Huang ASE, Huang FY, Chi H, et al. Management of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin osteomyelitis/osteitis in immunocompetent children-a systematic review. Vaccine. 2015;33:4391–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.07.039.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wansaula Z, Wortham JM, Mindra G, Haddad MB, Salinas JL, Ashkin D, et al. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin cases reported to the national tuberculosis surveillance system, United States, 2004–2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25:451–6. https://doi.org/10.3201/EID2503.180686.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Richter E, Weizenegger M, Rüsch-Gerdes S, Niemann S. Evaluation of genotype MTBC assay for differentiation of clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:2672–5. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.41.6.2672-2675.2003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Sevost'yanova TA, Aksenova VA, Sterlikov SA. Epidemiology and monitoring of complications after immunization with BCG/BCG-M in the Russian Federation. Medicinskiy Almanach. 2019;60(3–4):56–60. https://doi.org/10.21145/2499-9954-2019-3-56-60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Choi YY, Han MS, Lee HJ, Yun KW, Shin CH, Yoo WJ, et al. Mycobacterium bovis osteitis following immunization with Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2019;34(1):e3. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Saldaña NG, Ranero ARDC, Trujillo DMG, Garza EAD l, Tortoriello AIQ, Ruiz BV, et al. Osteitis secondary to BCG vaccine in immunocompetent patients: Three case reports. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98:e13871. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Aksenova VA, Mushkin AI, Kovalenko KN, Kaz'mina EA, Bakin MN, Isaeva NI, et al. BCG ostitis in children: the epidemiological parameters of some regions of the Russian Federation. Probl Tuberk Bolezn Legk. 2007;1:9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Korppi M, Teräsjärvi J, Liehu-Martiskainen M, Lauhkonen E, Vuononvirta J, Nuolivirta K, et al. Haplotype of the interleukin 17A gene is associated with osteitis after Bacillus Calmette-Guerin vaccination. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):11691. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12113-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Fortin A, Abel L, Casanova JL, Gros P. Host genetics of mycobacterial diseases in mice and men: forward genetic studies of BCG-osis and tuberculosis. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2007;8:163–92. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genom.8.080706.092315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dagg B, Hockley J, Rigsby P, Ho MM. The establishment of sub-strain specific WHO reference reagents for BCG vaccine. Vaccine. 2014;32:6390–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.09.065.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Markey K, Ho MM, Choudhury B, Seki M, Ju L, Castello-Branco LRR, et al. Report of an international collaborative study to evaluate the suitability of multiplex PCR as an identity assay for different sub-strains of BCG vaccine. Vaccine. 2010;28:6964–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.08.045.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Seki M, Honda I, Fujita I, Yano I, Yamamoto S, Koyama A. Whole genome sequence analysis of Mycobacterium bovis Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Tokyo 172: a comparative study of BCG vaccine substrains. Vaccine. 2009;27:1710–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.01.034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pan Y, Yang X, Duan J, Lu N, Leung AS, Tran V, et al. Whole-genome sequences of four Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccine strains. J Bacteriol. 2011;193:3152–3. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00405-11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Wada T, Maruyama F, Iwamoto T, Maeda S, Yamamoto T, Nakagawa I, et al. Deep sequencing analysis of the heterogeneity of seed and commercial lots of the Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) tuberculosis vaccine substrain Tokyo-172. Sci Rep. 2015;5:17827. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17827.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang W, Zhang Y, Zheng H, Pan Y, Liu H, Du P, et al. Genome sequencing and analysis of BCG vaccine strains. PLoS One. 2013;8:e71243. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071243.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Borgers K, Ou JY, Zheng PX, Tiels P, Van Hecke A, Plets E, et al. Reference genome and comparative genome analysis for the WHO reference strain for Mycobacterium bovis BCG Danish, the present tuberculosis vaccine. BMC Genomics. 2019;20(1):561. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5909-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Voronina OL, Kunda MS, Aksenova EI, Semenov AN, Ryzhova NN, Lunin VG, et al. Mosaic structure of Mycobacterium bovis BCG genomes as a representation of phage sequences' mobility. BMC Genomics. 2016;17:1009. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3355-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Sotnikova EA, Shitikov EA, Malakhova MV, Kostryukova ES, Ilina EN, Otrasheuskaya AV, et al. Complete genome sequence of Mycobacterium bovis strain BCG-1 (Russia). Genome Announc. 2016;4(2):e00182–16. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00182-16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Otrashevskaya E, Vinokurova V, Shitikov E, Sotnikova E, Perevyshina T, Kolchenko S, et al. M. bovis BCG-1 (Russia) sub-strain genome stability investigation within the entire production process. Zh Mikrobiol (Moscow). 2018;2:58–67.

    Google Scholar 

  38. World Health Organization. The use of next-generation sequencing technologies for the detection of mutations associated with drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex: technical guide: World Health Organization; 2018. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/274443. Accessed 13 Aug 2020.

  39. Keller PM, Böttger EC, Sander P. Tuberculosis vaccine strain Mycobacterium bovis BCG Russia is a natural recA mutant. BMC Microbiol. 2008;8:120. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-8-120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Bottai D, Di Luca M, Majlessi L, Frigui W, Simeone R, Sayes F, et al. Disruption of the ESX-5 system of Mycobacterium tuberculosis causes loss of PPE protein secretion, reduction of cell wall integrity and strong attenuation. Mol Microbiol. 2012;83(6):1195–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08001.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Saelens JW, Viswanathan G, Tobin DM. Mycobacterial evolution intersects with host tolerance. Front Immunol. 2019;10:528. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00528.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Sassetti CM, Rubin EJ. Genetic requirements for mycobacterial survival during infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:12989–94. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2134250100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Zvi A, Ariel N, Fulkerson J, Sadoff JC, Shafferman A. Whole genome identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis vaccine candidates by comprehensive data mining and bioinformatic analyses. BMC Med Genet. 2008;1:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-8794-1-18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Van Embden JDA, Cave MD, Crawford JT, Dale JW, Eisenach KD, Gicquel B, et al. Strain identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA fingerprinting: recommendations for a standardized methodology. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:406–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013871.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Li H. Exploring single-sample snp and indel calling with whole-genome de novo assembly. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1838–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts280.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1297–303. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.107524.110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang LL, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly (Austin). 2012;6:80–92. https://doi.org/10.4161/fly.19695.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Wattam AR, Davis JJ, Assaf R, Boisvert S, Brettin T, Bun C, et al. Improvements to PATRIC, the all-bacterial bioinformatics database and analysis resource center. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D535–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. UniProt Consortium. UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D506–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1049.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Kapopoulou A, Lew JM, Cole ST. The MycoBrowser portal: a comprehensive and manually annotated resource for mycobacterial genomes. Tuberculosis. 2011;91:8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. Ruslan Ludannyy, Egor Shitikov, and Olga Voronina for helpful conversations and thoughtful comments. Scientific research was performed using equipment of the Resource Center “Biobank”, Research park of St. Petersburg State University.

Funding

This research received funding from the Federal Government of the Russian Federation under Rospotrebnadzor Scientific Research Program AAAA-A16–116061410036-3.P.1.3.3.1. The funding body played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Molecular Epidemiology and Evolutionary Genetics, St. Petersburg Pasteur Institute, St. Petersburg, 197101, Russia

    Olga Narvskaya, Daria Starkova, Vladimir Molchanov, Anna Vyazovaya & Igor Mokrousov

  2. St. Petersburg Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology, St. Petersburg, 191036, Russia

    Olga Narvskaya, Alexander Mushkin, Viacheslav Zhuravlev, Natalia Solovieva & Boris Vishnevskiy

  3. Scientific Center for Expert Evaluation of Medical Products, Moscow, 127051, Russia

    Diana Levi & Natalia Alexandrova

  4. Present address: Van Andel Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, 49503-2518, USA

    Vladimir Molchanov

  5. Saint Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia

    Ekaterina Chernyaeva

Authors
  1. Olga Narvskaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daria Starkova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Diana Levi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Natalia Alexandrova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Vladimir Molchanov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ekaterina Chernyaeva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Anna Vyazovaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Alexander Mushkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Viacheslav Zhuravlev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Natalia Solovieva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Boris Vishnevskiy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Igor Mokrousov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ON, DL, AM, and VZ conceptualized the study and designed the experiments. NA, AV, EC, VZ, and NS performed data curation and laboratory experiments. VM, ON, and DS performed the computational analysis. ON, DS, VM, BV, and IM wrote and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Olga Narvskaya or Vladimir Molchanov.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Our retrospective, descriptive study was approved by the Independent Ethics Committee of St. Petersburg Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology of Ministry of Health, Russia (protocol №17/12–2017, 18.12.2017). All participants were under age of 16 and informed written consent to participate was obtained from their parents or legal guardians.

Administrative permissions were not required to access the samples and data used in this research.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Igor Mokrousov is a Section Editor in one of the BMC Series journals (BMC Microbiology). The authors declare that no other competing interests exist.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Sequence variants in BCG-1 (Russia) parent seed lots 361, 367, and 368 and their progeny clinical isolates (complete information). Sequence variants are presented as reads with alternative allele/all reads, ratio, %; del, deletion; fs, frameshift.

Additional file 2: Figure S1.

Comparative circular genome diagram of M. bovis BCG 1 (Russia) vaccine seeds and clinical isolates (circos plot was created with Circa (http://omgenomics.com/circa). Tracks from inside: scale in megabases; G.C. content histogram (yellow fill with black stroke) calculated from the ratio (G + C)/(A + T + G + C) using a 1 kilobase (kb) non-overlapping sliding window; G.C. bias plots calculated from the ratio (G C)/(G + C) using a 1 kb non-overlapping window (blue plot) and a 10 kb non-overlapping window (translucent black plot); strain number labeled tracks (alternating grey and white) each depicting strain-specific insertions/deletions (blue/red transverse marks) and SNPs (dots*) identified relative to the reference genome of M. bovis BCG-1 (Russia) (GenBank accession number CP013741); tracks depicting ORFs (blue transverse marks) alongside affected CDSs (black, orange and red transverse marks†) on forward and reverse strands; names of affected genes colored according to an impact type of the most severe variant affecting a particular gene. Notes. *Sizes and colors determine a particular SNP type: small black – synonymous SNP, large orange – missense SNP; †color determines an impact type of a particular variant on a particular CDS assigned according to the following concept: low impact (black mark) – synonymous SNPs, moderate impact (orange mark) – missense SNPs and conservative insertions/deletions, high impact (red mark) – nonsense SNPs and frameshift insertions/deletions. (PPTX 311 kb)

Additional file 3: Figure S2.

UspA domain 2: sequence alteration and truncation. (A) Sequences of affected UspA gene region. The top two rows depict reference region aligned against respective loci of strain 1032, indicating cytosine deletion in the codon 210. The third row represents the consensus sequence of the region highlighting premature opal (TGA) stop codon. (B) UspA amino acid sequence alteration and protein truncation. Domain 2 altered region and corresponding changed residues indicated in red. Ligand-binding sites depicted as green regions. (PPTX 59 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Narvskaya, O., Starkova, D., Levi, D. et al. First insight into the whole-genome sequence variations in Mycobacterium bovis BCG-1 (Russia) vaccine seed lots and their progeny clinical isolates from children with BCG-induced adverse events. BMC Genomics 21, 567 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-06973-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-06973-5

Keywords

BMC Genomics

ISSN: 1471-2164

Contact us