Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Genomic differences between the new Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. apii (Foa) race 4 on celery, the less virulent Foa races 2 and 3, and the avirulent on celery f. sp. coriandrii



Members of the F. oxysporium species complex (FOSC) in the f. sp. apii (Foa) are pathogenic on celery and those in f. sp. coriandrii (Foci) are pathogenic on coriander (=cilantro). Foci was first reported in California in 2005; a new and highly aggressive race 4 of Foa was observed in 2013 in California. Preliminary evidence indicated that Foa can also cause disease on coriander, albeit are less virulent than Foci. Comparative genomics was used to investigate the evolutionary relationships between Foa race 4, Foa race 3, and the Foci, which are all in FOSC Clade 2, and Foa race 2, which is in FOSC Clade 3.


A phylogenetic analysis of 2718 single-copy conserved genes and mitochondrial DNA sequence indicated that Foa races 3 and 4 and the Foci are monophyletic within FOSC Clade 2; these strains also are in a single somatic compatibility group. However, in the accessory genomes, the Foci versus Foa races 3 and 4 differ in multiple contigs. Based on significantly increased expression of Foa race 4 genes in planta vs. in vitro, we identified 23 putative effectors and 13 possible pathogenicity factors. PCR primers for diagnosis of either Foa race 2 or 4 and the Foci were identified. Finally, mixtures of conidia that were pre-stained with different fluorochromes indicated that Foa race 4 formed conidial anastomosis tubes (CATs) with Foci. Foa race 4 and Foa race 2, which are in different somatic compatibility groups, did not form CATs with each other.


There was no evidence that Foa race 2 was involved in the recent evolution of Foa race 4; Foa race 2 and 4 are CAT-incompatible. Although Foa races 3 and 4 and the Foci are closely related, there is no evidence that either Foci contributed to the evolution of Foa race 4, or that Foa race 4 was the recent recipient of a multi-gene chromosomal segment from another strain. However, horizontal chromosome transfer could account for the major difference in the accessory genomes of Foa race 4 and the Foci and for their differences in host range.


The Fusarium oxysporum species complex (FOSC) contains thousands of clonal lineages. Individual strains typically cause disease in a limited number of plant hosts, which led to the forma specialis (f. sp.) designation, e.g., FOSC in f. sp. apii (Foa) cause disease in celery (Apium graveolens var. dulce) [1]. However, strains in the same forma specialis may be polyphyletic [2] as in the case of Foa races 2 and 4 [3]. The FOSC have a “multi-speed genome” with chromosomes that have conserved genes and fewer transposons, and “accessory” chromosomes that are often smaller in size, are transposon-rich, and harbor rapidly evolving pathogenicity factors [4]. Although the FOSC are asexual, they can acquire chromosomes from other strains [5].

What we now call F. oxysporum f. sp. apii (Foa) race 1 was recognized by the 1930’s as an economically important pathogen of the “yellow” celery cultivars that were grown at that time [6]; Foa race 1 isolates are virulent on cv. Golden Self Blanching but avirulent on “green” or Pascal-type celery cultivars such as Tall Utah 52–70 R Improved and Challenger [3]. However, observations of variation in culture morphology [6], vegetative (=somatic) compatibility groups [7], two-locus DNA sequences [2, 3] and high throughput sequencing [3] indicate that race 1 isolates are polymorphic. Foa race 2 was first reported in 1976 in California [8, 9] and subsequently spread to other production areas in North America in the 1980’s. Foa race 2 is virulent on both Tall Utah 52–70 R Improved and Golden Self Blanching, and isolates appear to be monomorphic [3]. In 1984, Puhalla [10] noted that in addition to Foa race 2, there was a Foa race 3 in California that was virulent on Tall Utah 52–70 R Improved but reportedly avirulent on Golden Self Blanching; importantly, Foa race 3 was in a different somatic compatibility group than Foa race 2. In a study that included pathogenicity tests and two-locus sequencing of isolates collected between 1993 and 2013 from symptomatic celery plants that were primarily from California, none of the 174 isolates were classified as Foa race 3 [3]. However one isolate from a culture collection that was deposited as the Foa “T” strain by California researcher Shirley Nash Smith in 1981 was classified as a “Foa race 3-type” [3].

Following the discovery of Foa race 2, resistance was identified in celeriac (A. graveolens var. rapaceum) and introgressed into celery [11]. The resulting commercial celery cultivars such as Challenger, Command, Green Bay, and Sabroso, have been the major tool for Fusarium yellows management since the early 2000’s. In 2013, race 4 of Foa was discovered in Camarillo in Ventura County, California; this race is highly virulent on the race 2-tolerant cultivars such as Challenger, the older cultivar Tall Utah 52–70 R Improved, and a variety of current cultivars in California [3]. Based on a 10 gene phylogeny and an analysis of 6898 single nucleotide polymorphisms from the core FOSC genome, Epstein et al. concluded that i) Foa is polyphyletic with Foa race 2 in FOSC Clade 3 and Foa races 1, 3, and 4 in FOSC Clade 2, and ii) the archaic and less virulent race 3 and the new highly virulent race 4 are very similar, suggesting that Foa race 3 may serve as a genomic control for an analysis of Foa race 4.

F. oxysporum f. sp. coriandrii (Foci), which is pathogenic on coriander (=cilantro) but not on celery, was first reported in California in Santa Barbara County in 2005 [12]. Here, we further report that Foa race 4 has a broader host range than celery; it can also cause disease on coriander, although the Foci are more virulent on coriander than Foa race 4. After discovering that Foci are closely related to Foa races 3 and 4, we assembled high-quality genomes of Foa races 2, 3, and 4 and two isolates of Foci. We show evidence i) that Foa races 3 and 4 and the Foci are in a single somatic compatibility group and form a subclade with the FOSC Clade 2 based on 2718 aligned, conserved nuclear genes within the FOSC and the complete mitochondrial sequence; ii) that while the accessory genomes of Foa races 3 versus 4 are very similar, the Foci and the Foa in FOSC Clade 2 differ in approximately 37% of the accessory genome; and iii) that Foa race 4 apparently arose from a Foa race 3-like progenitor, and that neither the Foci nor Foa race 2 provided new DNA. Furthermore, we show that Foa races 2 and race 4 apparently do not form hetero-conidial anastomosis tubes, consistent with them being in separate species. We also identify i) previously undescribed effectors and pathogenicity factors that are up-regulated in Foa race 4 in planta; and ii) useful PCR primers for identifying Foa races 2 and 4 and the Foci.


Assembled isolates

The isolates whose genomes were assembled are shown in Table 1. Foa race 1 was not sequenced because it is polymorphic and contemporary celery cultivars in the USA are not susceptible. Isolates that represent Foa races 2, 3, and 4 were described previously [3]. Two Foci isolates were sequenced: Foci3–2, which was from the same area in Ventura Co. as Foa race 4, and FociGL306 which was the first reported Foci in California, and was isolated in 2004 from neighboring Santa Barbara County [12]. Further documentation on the collections are in Epstein et al. [3] and Additional file 1.

Table 1 The origin of Fusarium oxysporum isolates sequenced in this study

Pathogenicity characterization in celery and coriander

The three differential celery cultivars were transplanted into either uninfested soil, or soil infested with either Foa race 2, 3 or 4 (Fig. 1 a-d and g-j, Additional file 2). Foa race 4 is highly virulent on all three cultivars. Cultivar Challenger is tolerant of Foa races 2 and 3 (Fig. 1 h-i and o-p) and Tall Utah 52–70 R Improved is susceptible to Foa races 2 and 3 (Fig. 1 b-c and m-n). Historically [13], Foa was described as causing symptoms on primary, i.e., celery, and several secondary hosts. Based on an assay of direct seeding of coriander into infested soil and completion of Koch’s postulates, coriander cv. Longstanding is a secondary host of Foa race 4; coriander is also a secondary host of Foa races 2 and 3, but these races are less virulent than Foa race 4 (Fig. 1 q-r, Additional file 3).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Virulence of strains of F. oxysporum f. sp. apii and f. sp. coriandrii on celery and coriander. a-p Two-month-old celery cultivars were transplanted into uninfested soil (mock) or soil infested with either F. oxysporum f. sp. apii (Foa) race 2 (FoaR2), Foa race 3 (FoaR3), Foa race 4 (FoaR4), or the F. oxysporum f. sp. coriandrii strains Foci3–2 and FociGL306. (A-L) After 49 days, the median plant (n = 20) in height was photographed. (M-R) Kaplan-Meier plots of time to above-ground symptoms (left) and death (right) of the celery plants shown in either the photographs (m-p) or on coriander cv. Longstanding (q-r); coriander was direct-seeded. Treatments with 0% affected during the entire trial are not shown. Additional results from the same trial are shown in Additional file 3. For both days to symptoms and days to death, for each cultivar, P < 0.001 for the Log-Rank and Wilcoxon tests

As reported previously [12], our results show that the Foci are pathogenic on coriander, but not on celery (Fig. 1 e-f and k-l, Additional file 3). The Foci are more virulent on coriander than any of the Foa races (Fig. 1 q-r). From the eight isolates from symptomatic coriander fields, seven were Foci (i.e., non-pathogenic on celery and pathogenic on coriander), and one (FoaR4V-7.5B) is a Foa race 4. This isolate had the pathogenicity phenotype of Foa race 4 and the ef1 SNP variant that has so far only been found in one isolate of Foa race 4 from celery (FoaR4V-313–2.2).

Whole genome sequencing and assembly

We performed PacBio (>50X) and Illumina (>95X) sequencing of DNA from Foa races 2, 3, and 4, and two Foci isolates. Foa race 4 was also analyzed with a Bionano optical map. Each assembly was completed to a similar level of contiguity, with most core chromosomes in a single contig, and accessory chromosomes in multiple fragments (Table 2; Additional file 4). Based on Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO v2.0) with the Sordariomycota reference genes [14], all five of the genomes have > 98.7% of the expected single copy orthologs (Additional file 5) and meet or exceed the BUSCO parameters for quality of the F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fol)4287 reference assembly (Genbank GCA_000149955.2 ASM14995v2).

Table 2 Statistics for the assembled Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. apii and f. sp. coriandrii genomes

Phylogenetic analysis

Previously, using ten conserved genes in the FOSC, we placed Foa race 2 in FOSC Clade 3 and Foa races 1, 3 and 4 in FOSC Clade 2 [3]. Here, to further examine the relationship between our five, whole genome-sequenced strains and representative full-genome sequenced FOSC, we aligned 2718 BUSCO genes that were complete and single copy in all assemblies, concatenated the alignments, and generated a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree. The two Foci strains and Foa races 3 and 4 are in a single, well-supported sub-clade (Fig. 2); the larger FOSC Clade 2 sub-clade that includes Foci and Foa races 3 and 4 also includes F. oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum NRRL 25433.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The phylogeny of the Foa and Foci strains within the FOSC. BUSCO v. 2.0 (Benchmark of Unique Single Copy Orthologs) was used to identify 2718 full-length, single copy genes that were in all strains. Sequences were aligned with MUSCLE and concatenated into a single ~ 5.5Mbp sequence. A phylogenetic tree was generated with RaxML with the general time reversible evolutionary model. Support for the tree is based on 1000 bootstrap replicates; bootstrap values below 70 are not shown. The branches corresponding to FOSC Clades 1, 3, and 2 are color coded with green, red, and blue, respectively. Foa race 2 is indicated with an arrow and the Foa races 3 and 4 and the Foci isolates are indicated with a star

We also compared the mitogenomes of our whole genome-sequenced strains to FOSC mitogenomes from Brankovics et al. [15]. Our five strains have a type I mitochondrial variable region [15] (Additional file 6); Foa races 3 and 4 and the two Foci strains contain ORF 2284. Remarkably, Foa races 3 and 4 and the two Foci strains have an identical 45,699 bp mitogenome haplotype. While these four mitogenomes are 97 to 99.97% identical to other FOSC Clade 2 with a type 1 variable region, to date, there are no other characterized mitogenomes with an identical haplotype. The 47,671 bp mitogenome of Foa race 2 is unique amongst the currently sequenced mitogenomes but has a 99.2–99.7% identity to the mitogenomes in other strains in FOSC Clade 3 that have a type I mitochondrial variable region.

Core and accessory genome analyses

Based on the FOSC reference Fol4287 [16], which is in FOSC Clade 3, F. oxysporum have 11 core chromosomes (numbers 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7 through 13) with conserved genes and four accessory chromosomes that are highly variable between strains [4, 5]. We first used progressiveMauve software [17] to identify the contigs in the Foa and Foci strains that are part of core chromosomes (Additional file 4). In our five assemblies, 91% of the expected core chromosomes are represented by a single contig.

The assemblies indicate that there has been a major structural change to chromosomes within the Foci compared to Foa races 3 and 4. In both Foci3–2 and FociGL306, the homologs of Fol4287 chromosomes 10 (3.1 M bp) and 11 (2.4 M bp) are in a single contig (6.2 and 6.1 M bp, respectively), suggesting that there was a fusion in just the Foci chromosomes. In contrast, chromosomes 10 and 11 assembled into separate contigs in Foa races 2, 3 and 4. To examine the fused region, we determined the chromosome juncture with progressiveMauve [17] and used Geneious to identify a 198 bp juncture region that was identical in both Foci strains and absent in the Foa strains. For both strains, read coverage in this region was >68X and > 47X for Illumina and PacBio, respectively. These data, combined with the observation that these chromosomes assembled identically at this locus in both Foci strains, support that a fusion event preceeded the emergence of the two clones.

Contigs with homology to a core chromosome frequently had transposon-rich regions at their ends that lacked homology with the Fol4287 reference. Consequently, we defined the conserved and accessory genome by marking the beginning and end of progressiveMauve alignments to core chromosomes (Additional file 4). All regions without homology to a Fol4287 core chromosome were classified as part of the accessory genome, and all contigs without homology to a core chromosome were classified as accessory contigs (Additional file 7).

Using pairwise average nucleotide distances (andi) [18] of core, accessory and total genomes, the data in Table 3 indicate that Foa race 2 is the most dissimilar strain compared to the four members of the FOSC Clade 2 (P < 0.0001). The accessory genomes are significantly more dissimilar than the core genomes (P < 0.001). The pair of Foci strains and the pair of Foa races 3 and 4 are more closely related to their f. sp. partner than they are to the other f. sp. (P < 0.001).

Table 3 ANchor DIstances between the complete, core and accessory genomes of the Foa and Foci strainsa

Identification of host-specific versus lineage-specific contigs in the accessory genome of Foa race 4 and Foci3–2

We used a gene-independent, Illumina-mapping method to further examine the differences between the genomes, particularly in the accessory contigs in Foa race 4 versus Foci3–2. We selected Foa race 4 and Foci3–2 as reference strains, mapped filtered Illumina reads onto each contig, fragmented the references into 10 k bp segments, and then quantified the length of each segment with high-quality coverage. Compared to the Foa race 4 reference (Fig. 3 and Additional file 8), Foa race 3 has coverage over 99.7% of the genome, Foci3–2 and FociGL306 have 94.5 and 94.2% coverage, respectively, and Foa race 2 has only 78.9% coverage. Compared to the Foci3–2 reference (Fig. 3 and Additional file 9), FociGL306 has 99.2% coverage, Foa race 4 and Foa race 3 have 92.1 and 92.5% coverage, respectively, and Foa race 2 has only 78.2% coverage.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Coverage of Foa race 4 (FoaR4) and Foci 3–2 reference assemblies by Illumina reads from Foa and Foci strains. From each of the five strains, 6.5 Gbp (~100x coverage) of quality-filtered Illumina reads of each strain were mapped onto the Foa race 4 (a) and Foci 3–2 (b) reference assemblies. We calculated the proportion of coverage of each 10 kbp window in the reference assemblies. Here, only contigs with length greater than 150 kbp are shown, and are separated by vertical black lines. The darkest green sections of the histogram have a 100% coverage and the reddest sections have coverage close to 0%. Coverage of 0.5 (yellow) indicates that only 5 kbp of the 10 kbp segment had Illumina coverage. Contigs corresponding to core chromosomes are labeled above each plot. The IDs for contigs (Ctg) and scaffolds (Scf) that are associated with host specificity are lettered in red, below the plots. Each row corresponds to coverage from a single isolate, which is noted to the right of the graph (Foa race 2, FoaR2; Foa race 3, FoaR3). Additional files 8-9 have the quantification of the extent of Illumina-read coverage of each strain for each reference contig

There are major diffences in some of the contigs in the accessory genomes in the Foci versus Foa races 3 and 4. In Foa race 4, the host-specific superscaffolds 17, 14, and 13, which represent 35% of the analyzed accessory genome, have less Illumina coverage in the Foci (from 49 to 57%) than from the Foa race 3 and 4 strains (from 87 to 95%) (Additional file 8). Similarly, in Foci3–2, the host-specific contigs 12, 15, 16, 19, 20, and 21, which represent 39% of the analyzed accessory genome, have less Illumina coverage from Foa races 3 and 4 (from 18 to 45%) than from the Foci (from 99 to 100%) (Additional file 9). Conservation of sequences on these contigs is associated, in the isolates tested, with host-specific differences.

Syntenic analysis

We used Circos (version 0.69.9) [19] to visualize the density of repetitive elements and gene models in the core and accessory contigs of our strains (Fig. 4, Additional files 10, 12A-C, and 13A-B). The core chromosomes have a higher gene density and a lower density of repetitive elements than the accessory regions of the genome. To examine synteny within the core genomes, we examined the BUSCO genes that were present as a full-length, single copy in each pairwise genome comparison. As shown in the Circos plots with comparisons of the BUSCO genes (Additional file 10A-D) > 96% of the genes are syntenic, even in pairs of a FOSC Clade 2 with a Clade 3 strain (Additional file 10C-D). As shown in Additional file 10D, the BUSCO genes are concentrated in only core chromosomes 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7 through 10; these contigs account for 60% of the length of the genome and contain 98.1% of the Sordariomycete BUSCO genes in Foa race 4. Core chromosomes 11, 12, and 13 account for 17% of the length of genome but only have 0.4% of the BUSCO genes and the accessory contigs only have 1.5% of BUSCO genes.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Synteny of the accessory genomes of Foa race 4 and other strains. Circos plot comparisons of “reciprocal best BLAST hits” (RBBH) homologs of genes in non-core (=accessory) regions of the F. oxysporum genome in F. oxysporum f. sp. apii (Foa) race 4 on the right side and on the left side Foa race 3 (a), Foci3–2 (b), Foa race 2 (c) and Fol 4287 (d). Contigs less than 150kbp are not shown. Non-core regions were determined using progressiveMauve with Fol4287 as a reference. Tic marks on ring a are 500 kb. Within ring a, red lines indicate miniature impala transposable elements (mimps), and blue lines indicate all genes with significantly (adjusted P < 0.05) increased expression in planta in celery crowns that were infected with Foa race 4 compared to Foa race 4 grown in vitro. In ring b, the solid colors within the upper portion denote a region with homology to one of the Fol core chromosomes. Genes within these regions are part of the core genome. Blue shows the density of repetitive elements with a full scale of 120 per 100 kb increment. In ring c, dark grey shows the density of gene models with a full scale of 50 per 100 kb increment. In ring d, the grey lines show genes in the accessory genome that have an RBBH with a > 80% identity over > 80% of the predicted nucleotide sequence. In the center, lines connect the RBBH in the accessory genome; genes connected by black lines are in accessory contigs and genes connected with other colors are in non-core regions of core chromosomes. The plots illustrate the most synteny between Foa races 4 and 3 in the accessory genome, less synteny between Foa race 4 and the F. oxysporum f. sp. coriandrii (Foci) strain 3–2, and the least synteny between Foa race 4 and either Foa race 2 or the f. sp. lycopersici reference Fol4287. Quantification of the number of homologs and their synteny are in Additional File 1

To compare the accessory (non-core) genomes between strains, we identified pairs of homologous gene models based on reciprocal best BLAST hit matching (with a minimum of an 80% reciprocal sequence identity and length). The Circos plots in Fig. 4 show the position of homologous genes in the accessory genomes. Of 6159 predicted genes in the accessory genome of Foa race 4, 64% had a homolog in the Foa race 3 accessory genome (Additional file 11). Of those, 90% were syntenic with Foa race 4. Fewer homologs of Foa race 4 accessory genes were identified in the accessory genomes of the Foci strains. For example, accessory genomes of Foci3–2 and FociGL306 had homologs with 50 and 46%, respectively, of those in Foa race 4; of those, 84 and 82% were syntenic with Foa race 4. Foa race 2 and Fol4287 had the fewest homologs (15 and 14%, respectively), and of those, the least synteny (41 and 35%, respectively) with Foa race 4. The accessory genomes of the two Foci strains had the most similarity to each other (Additional files 9 and 13B-D); 75% of the accessory genes had homologs, and of those, 94% were syntenic.

For a more focused comparison, we selected four accessory contigs in Foa race 4 with the most up-regulated genes in planta and visualized synteny of genes on just these contigs with their homologs in other strains (Fig. 5). The selected contigs were lineage–specific superscaffolds 2 and 19, and host-specific superscaffolds 17 and 14, which collectively had a total of 1527 gene models and represented 25% of the Foa race 4 accessory genome. Compared to Foa race 4, Foa race 3 has more homologs than any of the other strains, but only for 59 to 73% of the gene models (Additional file 14). Foa race 2 and Fol4287 had the fewest (5 to 20%) and similar percentages (i.e., within three percentage points) of homologs in each of the four superscaffolds. Consistent with the quantification of read coverage on accessory contigs (Fig. 3), Foa race 4 and either Foci strain had fewer homologous genes on host-specific contigs SS17 and SS14 than on lineage-specific contigs SS2 and SS19. In particular, the Foci strains had homologs for fewer than 9% of genes on SS17 and 25% of genes on SS14, whereas the Foci strains had homologs for between 41 and 70% of genes on SS2 and SS19.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Synteny of gene models in four selected Foa race 4 accessory superscaffolds that have the most up-expressed genes in planta compared to in vitro. These four accessory contigs are shown on the top right, and contigs with homologous genes from the strain indicated in the top left are to the left and below in Foa race 3 (a), Foci3–2 (b), Foa race 2 (c) and Fol 4287 (d). Rings a-c are described in the legend for Fig. 4; the blue lines in ring a indicate all genes with significantly (adjusted P < 0.05) increased expression in planta in celery crowns that were infected with Foa race 4 compared to Foa race 4 grown in vitro. In the center, lines connect each “reciprocal best BLAST hit” (RBBH) with a > 80% identity over > 80% of the predicted nucleotide sequence. There are the following number of genes in each of the selected accessory Foa race 4 superscaffolds (SS): SS2, 523; SS17, 480; SS19, 320; and SS14, 204. In these selected accessory contigs, Foa race 3 (A) has homologs of 59 to 73% of these Foa race 4 gene models, depending on the contig (Additional file 14). Foci3–2 (B) has 70 and 58% of the homologs in the lineage-specific SS 2 and SS19 and only 8 and 25% of the homologs of the host-specific SS 17 and SS 14. Both Foa race 2 (C) and Fol 4287 (D), which are in FOSC Clade 3, have the fewest homologs, with only a total of 11 to 12% of the homologs in the four accessory contigs in Foa race 4

We visualized the synteny and conservation of predicted genes in Fol4287’s pathogenicity chromosome 14 with genes on any contigs from Foa race 4 and FociGL306 (Additional file 15). Foa race 4 and FociGL306 have homologs of 28 and 23% of genes on chromosome 14, respectively, but they are distributed over 15 contigs in Foa race 4 and 22 contigs in FociGL306. Although some genes from this pathogenicity chromosome appear to have homologs in Foci and Foa races 3 and 4, the distribution of homologs indicates that any horizontal transfer was ancient.

Transcriptomic analysis and identification of predicted effectors

We quantified gene expression via TagSeq [20] using 3′ QuantSeq mRNA libraries (Lexogen, Inc.) prepared from Foa race 4 during plant infection (in planta) and growth in liquid media (in vitro) with Foa races 2, 3, and 4. From 51 to 52% of the approximately 20 thousand predicted genes were expressed in vitro for each isolate (Additional file 7). With Foa race 4, 76 genes were expressed significantly less in planta (adjusted P < 0.05) and 80 genes were expressed significantly more in planta than in vitro. Amongst the 80 up-regulated Foa race 4 genes in planta, 23 were house-keeping genes that are unlikely to be specifically associated with virulence per se (data not shown), and 22 genes accounted for < 0.1% of the Foa race 4 counts in planta, and consequently were classified as lower priority for review. The 35 remaining genes of interest (Table 4) included 23 putative effectors (Additional file 16, GenBank MT364384-MT364418).

Table 4 Thirty-five up-expressed potential effectors or pathogenicity/virulence factors in Foa race 4 in plantaa

These putative effectors were predicted to have a signal peptide with a cleavage site, an extracellular localization, a relatively small molecular mass (< 35 kDa with a median of 12.8 kDa), and a median of 7 cysteine residues (Table 4). Accessory contigs contained 65% of these predicted highly-expressed effectors. All have an identical DNA sequence in Foa races 3 and race 4, but 65% have a duplication within Foa race 4 compared with race 3 (Additional file 16). Foa race 2 had homologs for 74% of these genes, although none had identical sequences to those found in Foa race 4. Forty-three percent of these predicted effectors had an identical sequence in both Foci isolates and Foa race 3 and 4.

For potential effectors associated with pathogenicity on celery, there are four predicted effectors (PGN.05952 and PGN.15680/PGN.06376/PGN.06650) that are present in all three Foa races and absent in the Foci. Of these, the predicted 122 aa protein in Foa race 2 is 93% identical to the Foa race 4 PGN.05952, and based on the NCBI nr database (as of 25 Aug. 2020), 97% identical to a predicted protein from F. oxysporum f. sp. melonis 26406 [21]. The 114 aa predicted protein of the other three putative effectors in Foa race 4 (PGN.15680/PGN.06376/PGN.06650) are 97–99% identical; each has an identical predicted protein in Foa race 3. The single Foa race 2 predicted protein is 96 and 94% identical to a hypothetical protein of F. oxysporum f. sp. conglutinans [22] and f. sp. cepae [23], respectively.

The only Secreted in Xylem (SIX) effector homolog with evidence of expression in Foa race 4 was SIX1 (NS.05815 and NS.05829, GenBank MT364385 and MT364398) [24,25,26,27]. Based on the genome assemblies, all the Foa strains have two SIX1 orthologs, whereas the Foci strains have only one (Additional file 17). Both SIX1 homologs were significantly up-regulated in planta; no expression was detected in vitro in the three Foa that were assayed (Data not shown). The two SIX1 orthologs in Foa race 3 and 4 are similar distances apart (46,973 and 50,005 bp, respectively), which suggests the ancestral SIX1 was duplicated and inverted in the same chromosome. There is evidence of divergence after duplication; the two orthologs share 86% of nucleotide sequence identities. Based on the GenBank non-redundant and Fusarium oxysporum “wgs” database, the FOSC Clade 2 Foa SIX1 have unique DNA sequences, with a maximum identity of 89% with other FOSC strains.

A curious association between effectors and miniature impala (mimp) non-autonomous, Class II transposable elements (TEs) and has been observed in FOSC formae speciales lycopersici, melonis, cucumerinum, and niveum [28, 29]. Remarkably, a total of seven effectors (of 23 up-regulated and highly expressed in planta) were within 2.5 kbp downstream of a mimp in the Foa race 4 reference assembly. Six of these effectors were located on lineage-specific Superscaffold 17, and were within 1.1 kbp of 8 of the 14 mimps identified on this scaffold (Additional file 16). Superscaffold 17 has 480 predicted genes in a length of 1.9 Mbp; the six mimp-associated effectors are distributed over 1.6 Mbp. The other effector in proximity to a mimp was on Superscaffold 4. The two SIX1 homologs were not within 2.5 kbp of a mimp.

Two-locus haplotypes and PCR primers for diagnosis

Except for Foa race 1 isolates, the Foa and Foci isolates in our collection (Additional file 18) were in three, ef1/igs haplotypes. First, the single isolate of Foa race 3, forty-five of forty-six isolates of Foa race 4 from celery, and seven of eight isolates from coriander have an identical two-locus haplotype (GenBank Accessions ef1: FJ985371.1, KX619213.1, KX619215.1, KX619220.1-KX619227.1, KX619229.1; igs: FJ985604.1, KX619387.1, KX619389.1, KX619394.1-KX619401.1, KX619403.1). Second, the other isolate of Foa race 4 (FoaR4V-313–2.2) and one of the isolates from coriander (FoaR4V-7.5B) differ by a single common SNP in an ef1 intron (GenBank Accessions MT295485, MT295484). As of 13 February 2020, none of entries in the Fusarium MLST ( and as of 30 September 2020, none of the F. oxysporum in the Fusarium spp. whole genome databases in GenBank at NCBI (Additional file 19) and only one f. sp. melonis (strain NRRL 22518, GenBank FJ985265 and FJ985447.1) in the nt database have the identical two-locus sequence of either the major or single-SNP variant haplotype. Third, the twenty-two pathogenic isolates of Foa race 2 have an identical haplotype. Each of the Foa race 1 isolates had a unique two-locus haplotype and were never implicated as the primary pathogen in a contemporary California cultivar.

Four new primer pairs were designed that can be used to identify either the Foa race 2 haplotype or Foa race 4 and/or Foci (Additional file 20). The primers can be used on DNA extracts from either cultures or from infected crown tissue. We did not develop primers for Foa race 3 because we have never isolated this strain from symptomatic celery [3].

Both empirical and in silico tests indicate that our previous Foa race 4 primers (NS3875–2) and our new Foa race 4 primers (FOAR4–447) cross-react with off-target FOSC strains (Additional files 18 and 20). However, because each individual primer pair amplifies different off-target isolates, they can together be used as a barcode to identify Foa race 4. The only observed false positive for this combination is Foci isolate 10T.

Most Foci isolates can be identified by amplification with the new FOCI-g_c31 and FOCI2–21 primers. Again, the exception to this test is Foci isolate 10T, which amplifies with both the older (NS3875–2) and the new FOAR4–447 Foa race 4 primers. It is important to note that we collected Foa race 4 from diseased coriander plants in one field and show that Foa race 4 causes disease on coriander. Therefore, if an isolate from coriander is positive for both Foa race 4 primers and negative for both Foci primers, a pathogenicity test is required to differentiate between a Foci10T-type and a Foa race 4.

We identified a new and more specific primer pair (FOAR2-76 k) that can be used to identify the Foa race 2 haplotype. Previously [3], we used pathogenicity testing on celery cultivars Tall Utah 52–70 R Improved and Challenger and ef1/igs two-locus sequencing to identify 22 Foa race 2 isolates that were amplified with the previous primer pair N4851 for Foa race 2. All these isolates were amplified with FOAR2-76 k. We also identified 18 isolates that had been isolated from celery with symptoms of Fusarium yellows that had the same ef1/igs two-locus sequence as Foa race 2 (e.g. GenBank KX619102.1 and KX619276.1), but were non-pathogenic on both celery cultivars; they also amplified with both the older and the new Foa race 2 primers. Three of the non-pathogenic isolates were collected before 1994; loss of pathogenicity in Foa during storage is common. We postulate that the other 15 non-pathogenic FOSC with the Foa race 2 haplotype are also isolates that have lost pathogenicity. None of the other 66 FOSC strains that we tested empirically or the 437 whole genome-sequenced FOSC at NCBI were amplified with FOAR2-76 k and none have an ef1/igs two-locus haplotype that is identical to Foa race 2.

Evaluation of hyphal and conidial anastomosis compatibility

Because we have isolated Foa race 2 and race 4 from the same celery plant (data not shown), we assessed whether the two strains could anastomose via either hyphae or conidial anastomosis tubes (CATs). Hyphal anastomosis compatibility was tested by pairwise combinations of nitM and nit1 mutants of Foa races 2, 3, and 4 and the two Foci strains (3–2, and GL306). The results indicate that Foa races 3 and 4 and the Foci strains are in the same somatic compatibility group, and that Foa race 2 is in a different somatic compatibility group.

To examine formation of conidial anastomosis tubes (CATs), Foa race 4 conidia that were pre-stained with wheat germ agglutinin that was conjugated to either Alexa Fluor 488 or 594 were mixed with a differently-stained strain, either Foci3–2 or Foa race 2. All three tested strains (Foa race 4, Foci, and Foa race 2) form “homo” CATs (Fig. 6). According to the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test, the normalized frequencies of hetero-CATs between Foa race 4 and Foci and both the homo-CATs were statistically indistinguishable (P = 0.41), i.e., Foa race 4 and Foci form hetero-CATs as readily as either does with its own strain. In contrast, in mixtures with Foa races 4 and 2, hetero-CATs were never observed either when a total of 695 CATs were scored or when CATs were examined but not recorded. In a Kruskall-Wallis analysis of the normalized frequencies of the Foa races 4 and 2 hetero- and homo-CATs, there were highly significant differences (P < 0.0001) between the strains; the non-parametric Steel-Dwass multiple comparison test found highly significant differences (P < 0.0001) between all pairs, i.e., there were highly significantly fewer (apparently non-existent) hetero-CATs than either homo-CATs, and there were highly significantly more homo-CATs of Foa race 2 than homo-CATs of Foa race 4. Consequently, Foa race 4 and Foci readily form hetero-CATs, but Foa races 4 and 2 are CAT-incompatible. We note that while most CATs are formed between two conidia, we also observed homo- and hetero-CAT clusters with more than two conidia. Figure 6f shows a homo-CAT cluster in which the middle conidium is connected to two other conidia; the conidium on the left has formed a CAT with the middle conidium and the middle conidium has formed a CAT with the conidium on its right.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Homo- (within strain) and hetero-(between strain) conidial anastomosis tubes. a-g Micrographs. F. oxysporum f. sp. apii race 4 (FoaR4) conidia were pre-stained with wheat germ agglutinin that was conjugated to either Alexa Fluor 488 or Alexa Fluor 594 (not shown) and then mixed with differently labeled F. oxysporum f. sp. coriandrii (Foci)3–2 or F. oxysporum f. sp. apii race 2 (FoaR2). After conidia were incubated on polystyrene in conditions conducive for conidial anastomosis tube (CAT) formation, a Leica with epifluorescent GFP and rhodamine filters, and a 63X objective with differential interference contrast optics, was used to record the images. Bars represent 10 μm. Short CATs are indicated with a single arrow and longer CATs are indicated with an arrow at each end of the CAT. a-b FoaR4 and Foci form hetero-CATs. c-g FoaR4, FoaR2 and Foci form homo-CATs. Hetero-CATs between FoaR4 and FoaR2 were never observed. f Three conidia form a CAT cluster. h-m Frequency of formation of homo- and hetero-CATs in mixtures of strains. h-j FoaR4 and Foci. k-m FoaR4 and FoaR2. CATs that could be categorized as hetero- or homo-CATs were recorded, as were the numbers of each of the labeled conidia in the same field of view. For each field of view in which there was at least one score-able CAT, the normalized frequency of the CAT category was computed to adjust for the number of possible pairs of each type. Data from three independent trials with similar results are shown here; a total of 741 and 695 CATs were evaluated in (h-j) and (k-m), respectively. A non-parametric Kruskall-Wallis test indicates that normalized frequencies of homo-Foa race 4, homo-Foci, and hetero-CATs of Foa race 4 and Foci were statistically indistinguishable (P = 0.41). In contrast, Foa race 4 did not form CATs with Foa race 2


Here, we release the first DNA assemblies of F. oxysporum f. sp. apii (Foa) races 2, 3, and 4 and F. oxysporum f. sp. coriandrii (Foci) genomes. Foa races 3 and 4 and Foci form a here-to-fore unexplored sub-clade of the FOSC Clade 2; they are in the same somatic compatibility group. This is apparently the first example within the FOSC of two formae speciales that are in the same somatic compatibility group. F. oxysporum f. sp. apii were amongst the first plant pathogenic fusaria that were recognized by Wollenweber in 1917 (as F. orthoceras) and were codified as a F. oxysporum forma specialis by Snyder and Hansen in 1940 [1]. In the U.S., Foa race 2 has been an economically important pathogen of celery since the mid-1970’s; highly susceptible varieties are no longer grown. Currently in California, Foa race 4 in celery and Foci in coriander have the characteristics of emerging infectious plant diseases: the pathogens are spreading, yield losses can be severe, and there are no economical solutions for their control. We propose that the disease caused by Foa race 4 be called Fusarium wilt of celery in order to better describe the disease and to differentiate it from Foa race 2, causal agent of Fusarium yellows on celery.

We speculate that Foa race 4 evolved recently for the following reasons: the disease first appeared in a single field in approximately 2011 [3]; this highly virulent strain has never been reported elsewhere; and it is closely related to, but distinct from, another strain (Foa race 3) that we obtained from a culture that presumably originated in California.

Because the apparently new and hyper-virulent Foa race 4 is overall highly similar and syntenic with the archaic Foa race 3, we speculate that Foa race 4 arose from a Foa race 3-like strain, which may have arisen from one of the polyphyletic Foa race 1 strains. Although horizontal chromosome transfer has been demonstrated in F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici [30], our analyses of short read coverage across contigs (Fig. 3, Additional files 8-9), synteny of gene models with Circos plots (Figs. 4-5 and Additional file 12), and colinear blocks with progressiveMauve (not shown), do not support the conclusion that the virulence of Foa race 4 is due to the acquisition of an entire chromosome from either Foa race 2 or a Foci. Nonetheless, we cannot rule out the possibility that Foa race 4 acquired a smaller DNA fragment from a member of the FOSC or another microorganism.

Our bioinformatic analyses suggest that horizontal chromosome transfer was a key evolutionary event in the separation of the Foci from Foa races 3 and 4. Foa races 3 and 4 and the Foci have highly similar DNA in the core genome and are all in the same somatic compatibility group. However, in accordance with horizontal chromosome transfer, the Foci differ from these Foa overall in ca. 37% of the accessory genome. Thus, we postulate that either these Foa and/or the Foci have acquired one or two different host-specific chromosomes via horizontal chromosome transfer [4, 30]. These chromosomes would have originated in isolates that were not sequenced in this study.

F. oxysporum CATs can be formed between strains in two different somatic compatibility groups [31], and we investigated whether Foa race 4 formed CATs with Foa race 2. Fusarium oxysporum can form microconidia in xylem vessels [32], and if a plant is co-infected by two strains (such as we have observed with Foa race 2 and race 4), conidial anastomosis tubes (CATs) could be a portal for DNA exchange between these somatically incompatible isolates [33]. First, we demonstrated that we could pre-label microconidia with wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) conjugated with one of two fluorophores, mix conidia with the two different fluorophores, allow the conidia to form conidial anastomosis tubes, and then score CATs as either homo-CATs (between two conidia of the same strain) or hetero-CATs (between two conidia of different strains). Second, we demonstrated that Foa race 4 and Foci3–2, which are in the same somatic compatibility group, form hetero-CATs as readily as either strain forms homo-CATs. Therefore, both hyphal and CAT fusion could enable DNA exchange between Foa races 3 and 4 and Foci in nature. As far as we know, this is the first demonstration of CATs between two strains within FOSC Clade 2. Third, we demonstrated that Foa races 4 and 2, which are in different FOSC clades, do not form hetero-CATs in conditions in which they form homo-CATs (Fig. 6).

Shahi et al. [31] showed that CATs were formed between two somatically incompatible strains (F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici strain 4287 and the biocontrol strain F. oxysporum Fo47), which are both in FOSC Clade 3. They and others have suggested that heterokaryon incompatibility is at least partially suppressed during CAT fusion in F. oxysporum and Colletotrichum lindemuthianum [34]. However, our results indicate that barriers to CAT-mediated nuclear exchange exist within the FOSC, at least between strains in different FOSC clades. This CAT-incompatibility between a strain in FOSC Clades 2 and 3 is further evidence that these FOSC clades are indeed different species [2].

The potential for gene flow between distinct formae speciales complicates efforts to develop durable tools for molecular identification. In addition to hyphal and CAT compatibility, these Foa and Foci share a common geographic range, and celery and coriander crops are commonly rotated in the same fields in California. We have detected genetic variation within the Foci that may suggest that genetic exchange between these phenotypically defined groups has occurred in nature. Specifically, in contrast to six of the Foci (including the two whole genome sequenced strains), one of the Foci (Foci10T) has an ef1/igs haplotype that is associated with a minor Foa R4 variant, is positive for the intended Foa race 4 marker FOAR4–447 and negative for the intended Foci markers FOCI2–21 and FOCI-g_c31 (Additional files 18 and 20). This observation is most easily explained by gene flow between these formae speciales; chromosomes carrying the marker sequences, but not all the genes required for virulence on celery, may have been transferred. Perhaps as a consequence, we were not able to develop a test that specifically differentiates all Foci from Foa race 4.

In addition to causing disease in the greenhouse, Foa race 4 can cause disease of coriander in the field. That is, coriander is a secondary, symptomatic host of Foa race 4. However, Foa race 4 was recovered from only one out of seven coriander fields surveyed, presumably because Foa race 4 is less virulent than Foci on coriander.

Both the two hosts (celery and coriander) and pathogens (Foa races 3 and 4 and the Foci) are closely related. Celery and coriander are both in the subfamily Apioideae in the family Apiaceae. This suggests that these closely related hosts may share susceptibility factors, as has been postulated elsewhere [35], and that co-evolution between host and pathogen may have occurred in these pathosystems. Future characterization of the mechanisms of resistance by celery to Foci and pathogenicity determinants in these formae speciales is necessary to test this hypothesis.

This is the first examination of putative effectors in the Foa and Foci. Notably, the Foa in both FOSC Clade 2 (races 3 and 4) and FOSC Clade 3 (Foa race 2) have two Secreted in Xylem 1 (SIX1) homologs but the Foci only have one. Both SIX1 homologs are highly expressed in the crowns of Foa race 4-infected celery but are essentially not expressed when any of the three Foa races are grown in vitro. Other FOSC strains have multiple SIX1 homologs [25], which are virulence factors in multiple formae speciales, including F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici [36], f. sp. conglutinans [26], and f. sp. cubense tropical race 4 [37]. In f. sp. lycopersici, SIX1 also serves as an avirulence gene in eliciting host defense in tomatoes with the I-3 gene [24]. Other formae speciales that have a SIX1 homolog include strain Fo5176 in Arabidopsis [38], betae in sugar beet [39], canariensis in date palm [40], lini in flax [29], melonis in melon [41], pisi in pea [42], cepae in onion [43], and physali in cape gooseberry [44]. The conservation of SIX1 in many pathosystems suggests that either directly or indirectly it targets a conserved plant protein. Interestingly, SIX1 in Foa race 4 and the Foci are on host-specific accessory contigs. In addition to SIX1, all of the other 23 up-regulated and highly expressed putative effectors shown in Table 4 have homologs in other FOSC strains (Additional file 16).

Interestingly, four of the 23 putative effectors identified in Foa race 4 (PGN.05952 and a family containing PGN.15680, PGN.06376, and PGN.06650) have homologous DNA in Foa races 2 and 3, that is absent in the Foci assemblies (Additional file 16); the two homologs in Foa race 2 are located in a single accessory 3.3 Mb chromosome-sized contig (no. 9). Whether these two effectors in particular are involved in pathogenicity in celery remains to be determined [45]. Regardless, van Dam et al. [41] provided support for the hypothesis that even polyphyletic f. sp. share distinctive effector profiles. Here, we note that, based on DNA homology at the NCBI GenBank whole genome database for Fusarium spp. (Additional file 19), there is 100% identity of the Foa race 4 homolog with strains of the multiple ff. spp.: PGN.05952 and f. sp. spinaciae; and PGN.15680 and f. sp. niveum. PGN.06376/PGN.06650 has greater than 98% identity with strains in f. sp. lini, vasinfectum, niveum, and albidinis. This suggests that there may be an active shuffling of pangenomic DNA across ff. spp. in the FOSC [46] that are CAT-compatible; although individual FOSC strains only cause disease in a narrow host range, the FOSC can infect “non-hosts” [35] and consequently could share DNA in environments where CAT can form.

Using transcriptomics, we detected increased expression of two putative transposons in Foa race 4 in planta (NS.12180 and NS.11338 in Table 4); both were amongst the 35 selected genes that had significantly increased expression in planta than in vitro, accounted for > 0.1% of the cDNA counts in planta, and did not encode for a “housekeeping gene.” The quantity of TEs (Additional file 21) particularly in the accessory genome (as shown in the Circos plots) suggest that they are involved in the evolution of all the Foa and Foci. There is also evidence of expression of other transposons in vitro (data not shown). Consistent with the observed association of mimps and promoter regions of effector genes in Fol4287 pathogenicity chromosome 14 [47], we show that in Foa race 4 superscaffold 17, six of eight putative effectors that are up-regulated in planta have one or more mimps within 1.1 kbp of the start codon. Whether mimps are active and important in these FOSC remains to be determined.


We report the first full-genome assemblies of F. oxysporum f. sp. apii (Foa) races 2, 3 and 4 and two strains of the related F. oxysporum f. sp. coriandrii (Foci), each with fewer than 75 contigs. Foa races 3 and 4 (which are primarily pathogenic on celery) and the Foci (which are only pathogenic on coriander) are in the same somatic compatibility group; both celery and coriander are in the plant family Apiaceae. Our bioinformatic and biological comparisons lead to the following conclusions. 1) Consistent with Epstein et al. [3], Foa is polyphyletic with race 2 in FOSC Clade 3 and races 3 and 4 in FOSC Clade 2, i.e., Foa races 2 and 4 are comparatively unrelated. 2) Based on analyses of both the core and accessory genomes, the older and less virulent Foa race 3 is a useful genomic control for the new and highly virulent Foa race 4, i.e., Foa race 4 presumably arose from a Foa race 3-like progenitor, although apparently not from our Foa race 3 isolate. 3) Foa races 3 and 4 and the Foci are in a well-supported FOSC Clade 2 sub-clade based on the fact that they are in the same somatic compatibility group, share a mitochondrial DNA haplotype, and have highly similar core genomes. However, within the FOSC Clade 2 Foa-Foci subclade, the Foa and the Foci have distinguishable accessory genomes, and, based on total length, differ in approximately 37% of the accessory contigs. Consequently, horizontal chromosome transfer of a pathogenicity chromosome is presumably responsible for the main difference between Foa race 4 and the Foci. 4) Although the literature [31] indicates that two F. oxysporum strains that are in different somatic compatibility groups within the same FOSC can form conidial anastomosis tubes (CAT) that allows chromosome transfer, Foa race 2 and Foa race 4, which are in different somatic compatibility groups, do not form hetero-CATs, but do form homo-CATs. Thus, in accordance with a lack of evidence of transmission of Foa race 2 alleles into Foa race 4, there may be no mechanism of horizontal chromosome transfer across FOSC Clades from Foa race 2 into a progenitor of Foa race 4. 5) Although Foa race 4 and Foci are CAT-compatible, there is similarly no bioinformatic evidence that novel Foci alleles contributed to the evolution of Foa race 4. More generally, there is no current bioinformatic evidence that Foa race 4 was the recipient of a relatively large chromosomal segment from another strain. 6) Based on significantly increased expression in planta vs. in vitro with RNA TagSeq of Foa race 4, we identified 23 putative effectors and 12 other pathogenicity factors including two presumably active transposons; two of the putative effectors are encoded by Secreted in Xylem (SIX1) genes. 7) We selected and verified diagnostic PCR primers for Foa races 2 and race 4.


Isolate culture and storage conditions

Celery and coriander plants with symptoms of F. oxysporum infections were collected and taken to the laboratory. Symptomatic plants with visible rotting were not sampled to avoid isolation of secondary organisms. The geographic origin of the sequenced isolates is indicated in Table 1. After F. oxysporum was cultured from symptomatic plant tissue, cultures were single-cell purified and stored as described previously [3].

Virulence tests

To produce F. oxysporum inoculum for soil infestation, millet seeds were hydrated overnight. One hundred cc of drained seeds per 500 ml flask were autoclaved, and then infested with either plugs from one-week-old cultures grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA) or dried conidia that had been stored on filter paper. Cultures were incubated under approx. 5000 lx cool-white fluorescent lights at 22 °C for 8 to 10 days; cultures were shaken vigorously every other day for more uniform colonization of the substrate.

For uninfested planting media in the greenhouse, we mixed steam-sterilized University of California Davis greenhouse soil (GHS) as a 3:1 (v/v) mix of perlite: GHS. The perlite: GHS mix was placed in either 10 cm diam pots or 6.4 cm diam planting tubes. For celery in infested soil, the bottom ¾ of pot or tube was filled with the perlite: GHS mix and the upper ¼ was filled with a thoroughly mixed preparation of a 1:15 (v/v) ratio of inoculum to the perlite-GHS mix. Uninfested controls had neither inoculum nor millet seeds.

Celery seeds were obtained from the following: Golden Self Blanching and Tall Utah 52–70 R Improved from Burpee Seed Co. (Warminster, PA, USA) and Challenger from Syngenta (Woodland, CA, USA). Two-month-old celery was transplanted into the infested soil. Golden Self Blanching is an heirloom yellow cultivar, Tall Utah 52–70 R Improved is a green Pascal-type cultivar, and Challenger was first marketed in 1999 as a Foa race 2-resistant, Pascal-type cultivar. In keeping with agricultural practice, coriander cv. Longstanding (Ferry Morse, Fulton, KY, USA) was direct-seeded. For coriander, we used the same perlite: GHS mix, but used a uniformly infested soil with a 1:60 (v/v) ratio inoculum to the perlite: GHS mix throughout the entire pot. Germination occurred after 8 to 10 days. All plants were maintained in a greenhouse that was maintained between 27 and 29 °C. Foliar symptoms were recorded weekly.

Harvested plants were washed and scored for typical vascular discoloration on a 0 to 5 severity scale: 0, asymptomatic: 1, some discoloration in the lateral root vasculature; 2, some discoloration in the main root vasculature; 3, some discoloration in the crown vasculature; 4, extensive discoloration of the crown vasculature; and 5, plant dead. Based on the mock-inoculated controls, isolates with a mean of < 1.0 were rated as nonpathogenic. To confirm that symptoms were caused by pathogens, Koch’s postulates were completed on the isolates that were not previously characterized in Epstein et al. [3].

Two locus sequencing

Isolates that were not previously sequenced in the ef1 and IGS rDNA amplicons were Sanger-sequenced as described previously [3]. New NCBI GenBank accession numbers for ef1 are MT295484-MT295492 and for IGS are MT295475-MT295483.

High throughput sequencing

Total genomic DNA was purified as described previously [48]. Illumina libraries were prepared and sequenced by either the University of California at Davis DNA Technologies Core Facility or the Michigan State University Genomics Core Facility. Library quality was confirmed before sequencing using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Techonologies). The Illumina platform used for sequencing each isolate is listed in Table 2. PacBio SMRTbell libraries were prepared at the University of California at Davis DNA Technologies Core Facility and sequenced on the PacBio RSII platform. Sequence coverage is indicated in Table 2.

Genome assemblies

F. oxysporum f. sp. apii (Foa) race 4

PacBio RSII reads were assembled with the HGAP3 pipeline in smrtanalysis v2.3.0 with default parameters and an estimated genome size of 50 Mb. This initial assembly had an average coverage of 70.2X and contained 135 contigs. Two hundred fifty bp paired-end Illumina MiSeq reads (35X) coverage [3] were initially used for error correction. These reads were trimmed to a minimum Phred score of 20 with Trimmomatic (v0.33), mapped to the assembly with Bowtie2, and indels/snps were corrected with Pilon v1.18 (as specified by the “--fix bases” parameter).

To correct the assembly, Bionano optical mapping was conducted by the Luo Lab (Plant Sciences, UC Davis) using the Irysview (version 2.5.1) software. First, the sequence assembly was used to generate an in silico map of target sites for BspQI and BssSI restriction endonucleases. A complete double digestion had a predicted 116,009 DNA molecules greater than 150,000 bp in length (The N50 for molecule length was 253.3 k bp). The experimentally-generated optical map had a total length of 97.25 M bp and an N50 of 0.74 M bp. The sequence-based and optical maps were aligned to identify chimeric sequences and to scaffold un-assembled contigs. This comparison revealed 6 chimeric sequences that were disassembled into 13 contigs, and 59 unassembled contigs that were stitched into 16 scaffold sequences.

For further error correction, we removed 23 contigs that were likely to be sequencing artifacts: contigs with low (< 19X) coverage with PacBio reads compared to the assembly average of 70X; no evidence for existence in the optical map; and less than 55 kbp in length. We next performed an additional error correction by mapping 150 bp paired-end Illumina Hiseq reads (~120X coverage) with Bowtie 2 (using ‘--end-to-end’ alignment only) and Pilon (version 1.18) error correction. The mapping/Pilon error correction process was repeated four times until few new errors were identified.

Other genome assemblies

PacBio RSII reads of Foa races 2 and 3 and Foci3–2 and GL306 were assembled by Falcon (version 0.4.2). The resulting assemblies were polished with PacBio reads using the quiver consensus module smrtanalysis (version 2.3.0). Additional error correction was conducted by mapping 150 bp paired end Illumina reads to assemblies with Bowtie 2 (using ‘--end-to-end’) and polishing with Pilon (version 1.18). This process was repeated four times.


Genomes were annotated with CodingQuarry (version 2.0) using gene models pre-trained on the Fol4287 version 2 genome with in vitro and in planta RNAseq reads [41, 49]. SignalP (version 5.0) was used to predict secretion signals, and WoLF PSORT was used to confirm extracellular localization. Transposons were annotated by Repeatmodeler (version 1.0.11) and RepeatMasker (version 4.0.8) [50]; results are summarized in Additional file 21. Miniature impala (mimp) transposable elements were annotated by TIRmite (version 1.1.3) using four profile hidden Markov models built from terminal inverted repeats of mimps identified using the regular expression pattern “..CAGTGGG..GCAA[TA]AA” ( A script for running TIRmite for mimp discovery is provided at

Phylogenetic analyses

The following FOSC assemblies from GenBank ( and the designation in Fig. 2 are as follows: GCA_001702695.2, Fo_radicis-cucumerinum_forc016; GCA_000259975.2, Fo_lycopersici_MN25; GCA_001757345.1, Fo_ciceris_38–1; GCA_000260075.2, Fo_pisi_HDV247; GCA_000260155.3, Fo_radicis-lycopersici_26,381; GCA_000260175.2, Fo_vasinfectum_25,433; GCA_000260195.2, Fo_cubense_54,006 (synonym, F. odoratissimum); GCA_000260215.2, Fo_conglutinans_54,008; GCA_000260235.2, Fo_raphani_54,005; GCA_002318975.1, Fo_melonis_26,406; GCA_000271705.2, Fo_biocontrol_Fo47; GCA_000271745.2, Fosc_3a; GCA_000350365.1, Fo_cubense_race 4 (synonym, F. odoratissimum); GCA_000733055.2, FoUASWSAC1; GCA_003315725.1, Fo_lycopersici_4287; GCA_001702495.1, Fo_cucumerinum_013; GCA_001702505.1, Fo_niveum_005; GCA_001702515.1, Fo_cucumeriunum_001; GCA_001702545.1, Fo_cucumerinum_018; GCA_001702615.1, Fo_cucumeriunum_030; GCA_001702635.1, Fo_cucumeriunum_037; GCA_001702725.1, Fo_radicis-cucumerinum_ forc024; GCA_001702745.1, Fo_niveum_002; GCA_001702775.1, Fo_niveum_013; GCA_001702795.1, Fo_niveum015; GCA_001702845.1, Fo_niveum_037; GCA_001702865.1, Fo_niveum_021; GCA_001702995.1, Fo_lycopersici_016; GCA_001703215.1, Fo_melonis_004; GCA_001703255.1, Fo_melonis_006; GCA_001703265.1, Fo_melonis_009; GCA_001703295.1, Fo_melonis_011; GCA_001703305.1, Fo_melonis_010; GCA_002233795.1, Fo_momordicae_90nf2; GCA_002233805.1, Fo_tulipae_Tu67; GCA_002233895.1, Fo_gladioli_FoglaG2; GCA_002234045.1, Fo_nicotianae_10913; GCA_002234105.1, Fo_luffae_114; GCA_002234115.1, Fo_lilii_39; GCA_002234135.1, Fo_lagenariae_31; GCA_002711405.2, Fo_conglutinans_FGL03–6; and GCA_900096695.1, Fo_V64. Simão et al. [14] selected 3735 single copy BUSCO genes in Sodariomycetes. We selected 2718 single copy, full-length orthologues that were present in all strains, aligned the sequences with MUSCLE (version 3.8), concatenated the genes into a single, ~ 5.5 Mbp sequence, and then used RAxML (version 8.2.12) to generate a maximum likelihood phylogeny using the general time reversible evolutionary model with gamma correction and 1000 bootstrap replicates [51, 52].

For phylogeny of the mitochondrial DNA (mitogenome), we used 35 annotated mitochondrial sequences from Brankovics et al. [15] with F. commune JCM11502 (LT906348.1 in GenBank) as an outgoup. Brankovics et al.’s [15] four FOSC clade 1 strains and their GenBank mitogenomes are as follows: f. sp. cubense race 4 II5 (=NRRL 54006) (LT906347.1) and B2 (LT571433.1); f. sp. cucumerinum Foc013 (LT906309.1) and f. sp. vasinfectum Fov24500 (LT906346.1). The 19 FOSC Clade 2 reference strains and their GenBank mitogenomes are as follows: f. sp. conglutinans race 2 PHW808 (=NRRL 54008) (LT906357.1); f. sp. cubense race 1 N2 (LT906350.1); f. sp. cucumerinum Foc001 (LT906307.1), Foc030 (LT906313.1), Foc035 (LT906314.1), and Foc037 (LT906315.1); Fom006 (LT906327.1), Fom009 (LT906328.1), Fom010 (LT906329.1), Fom011 (LT906330.1); f. sp. niveum Fon002, (LT906334.1), Fon005 (LT906335.1), Fon013 (LT906337.1), Fon015 (LT906338.1), Fon019 (LT906339.1), Fon021 (LT906341.1); f. sp. pisi NRRL 37622 (LT906354.1); f. sp. f. sp. raphani NRRL 54005 (= PHW815) (LT906356.1) and f. sp. vasinfectum NRRL 25433 (LT906351.1). The 10 FOSC Clade 3 reference strains and their GenBank mitogenomes are as follows: f. sp. lycopersici DF023 (LT906301.1), Fol016 (LT906319.1), race 24,287 (=NRRL 34936) (LT906324.1), race 3 NRRL 54003 (= MN25) (LT906355.1); f. sp. melonis (NRRL 26406) (LT906353.1); f. sp. radicis-cucumerinum Forc016 (LT906342.1), f. sp. radicis-lycopersici NRRL 26381 (=CL57)(LT906352.1), and the F. oxysporum NRRL 54002 (= Fo47) biocontrol strain from soil (LT906306.1), the UASWS AC1 strain (LT906358.1), and the FOSC3-a human pathogenic strain (LT906345.1). To assemble the mitogenomes of our three Foa and two Foci strains, we extracted the mitogenomes from the Illumina assemblies [15] using the Geneious 11.1.5 software. In order to detect artifacts in the assembly associated with the expectation of a linear rather than a circular DNA molecule, we mapped the Illumina reads to the mitogenome, and circularized the DNA starting at the ‘ATG’ start codon of the nad2 gene. To determine if an apparent SNP within a homopolymer of 11A’s was an artifact, we amplified the homopolymer that preceeded nad2 with primers FOSC-pre-nad2-HomoP 5’AGAATTCGATTTTCTCCTAAGGCTCGC3′ (forward) and 5’ACCACCGTGTAAACCTACTCCTTTAGT3′ (reverse). We used Mafft 1.3.7 in Geneious Prime 2020.0.4 to align the sequences and manually checked the alignment. A phylogenetic tree was generated in Geneious with RaxML with the general time reversible evolutionary model GAMMA. Rapid bootstrapping and search for the best-scoring maximum parsimony tree was done with 1000 bootstrap replications.

Identification of core and accessory contigs

For our five assemblies (Table 2), we identified homologs of the 11 core Fol 4287 chromosomes (Genbank GCA_003315725.1) with progressiveMauve [17]. Contigs, or portions of contigs, that did not share a colinear block with the Fol 4287 reference, were classified as either accessory contigs or non-core regions on a core chromosome, respectively.

Pairwise genomic comparisons of the Foa, Foci and Fol 4287 reference strains

Average nucleotide distances of the core and accessory genomes (as identified by progressiveMauve) were computed by andi [18]. andi values were log-transformed and analyzed by contrast analysis in ANOVA. Circos (version 0.69.9) was used to visualize synteny and specific genomic features [19]. Synteny was quantified using a program at After the selection of pairs of homologous genes, each contig of the reference strain was sorted by locus. Then, each reference contig was broken into blocks with a constant target contig. A target gene in that block was considered syntenic if it belonged to either an ascending or a descending run of at least three target genes within the block.

Identification of strain-specific regions in Foa races 3 and 4 and Foci3–2 by read mapping

Raw Illumina reads were filtered for quality with the following HTStream (version 1.0.0; functions: hts_SuperDeduper (to remove PCR duplicates); hts_AdapterTrimmer (to remove adapter sequences); hts_SeqScreener (to remove adapter and phiX sequences), hts_QWindowTrim (to trim read ends with a PHRED quality value less than 20), and hts_NTrimmer (to keep only reads with no Ns). Only reads that were greater than 90 bp were retained (−M 90). From the filtered reads, 6.5 Gbp (~100x coverage) were aligned to the reference genome with BWA MEM (version 0.7.17-r1188) [53, 54]. Read coverage of the alignments was calculated with Bedtools ‘genomecov’ function (version 2.29.0), and regions with coverage less than 10x were discarded [54]. The Bedtools ‘coverage’ function was then used to calculate the proportion of bases with coverage for each 10kbp window in the genome. Coverage was visualized in R (version 3.5.2) using the package ggplot2 [55, 56]. To quantify an overall Illumina-coverage as a proxy for genome similarity, we calculated a weighted average of the coverage relative to the reference strain; the calculations were based on the contigs shown in Additional files 8 and 9.

Differential expression experiments and analysis

For in vitro treatments, five replicates of Foa race 2, 3 and 4 were grown in 0.17% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids, 3% sucrose and 100 mM potassium nitrate at 100 rpm at 27 °C for 72 h. For each of five replicates, eight celery cultivar Tall Utah 52–70 R Improved plants were either transplanted into uninfested soil or soil infested with Foa race 4 and incubated for 21 days. Crown tissue was first coarsely ground with a pestle at the greenhouse in RNAlater (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham MA) at 4 °C and then finely ground in a liquid N2-cold mortar with 5 volumes of sterile sand and 20 mg polyvinylpolypyrrolidone/crown. The RNA was extracted at 65 °C in a RNAase-free buffer with 3% CTAB, 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8), 1.4 M NaCl, 20 mM EDTA, 5% polyvinylpyrrolidone, and (freshly added) 1.4% mercaptoethanol [57]. RNA was purified in chloroform:isoamyl alcohol and chloroform, precipitated in lithium chloride, and washed in 75% ethanol. DNA was digested with a TURBO DNA-free kit (ThermoFisher Scientific). RNA was quantified with Qubit and integrity was assessed with an Agilent Bioanalyzer. The University of California at Davis DNA Technologies Core Facility prepared 3’ QuantSeq mRNA libraries (Lexogen, Inc.) using a protocol with 14 PCR cycles [20]. At the same facility, the five replicate samples/treatment were 90 or 100 bp single-end sequenced on a HiSeq 4000. Raw reads were quality filtered with HTStream as previously described with minor modifications: PCR duplicates were not removed, and we used hts PolyATTrim to trim poly-A/T regions from the beginning or ends of reads. Filtered reads were aligned to the respective fungal reference genome with STAR (version 2.7.0) with a maximum allowed intron size of 6000 bp [58]. A 1000 bp UTR feature was added to the 3’ end of each gene using a custom python script ( Read counts per gene were calculated by htseq-count (HTSeq version 0.6.1) from both CDS and UTR features.

For the in vitro replicates, there were 4.6 + 0.4 (SEM), 5.0 + 0.2, and 4.4 + 0.4 million sequenced reads for races 2, 3, and 4, respectively. However, because approx. 99.6% of the in planta reads were celery (data not shown), we performed additional sequencing of one of the in planta Foa race 4 replicates so that there 8.4 X 105 mapped reads; the other four replicates had 1.7 + 0.2 X 104 mapped reads. For Foa race 4, differential expression was calculated in pairwise comparisons between in vitro and in planta samples with ‘EdgeR’ [59]. First, all annotated genes were filtered to include only those with sufficient counts for statistical analysis using three counts per replicate in the in vivo samples and the (function = filterByExpr). The remaining genes were Voom transformed (function: voom) and fit to a model matrix (function: model.matrix). For each gene, contrasts were calculated between in vitro and in planta samples (function: makeContrasts) and analyzed using the contrasts fit function. The ‘eBayes’ function was used for empirical Bayes smoothing of standard errors.

Because the QuantSeq-identified, up-regulated, in planta gene PGN.06282 was only present in the Foa race 4 assembly, we designed PCR primers (5’CCATAGGCTTAGAAAGGTAAGTC3’ and 5’TTTCTTCAGTGGTCTCACTATG3’), and found an amplicon in Foa race 3; we then discovered that the Foa race 4 PGN.06282 was present in the raw reads (but not the final assembly) of Foa race 3.

Foa race 2 and race 4 and Foci diagnostic PCR assays

We identified potential targets for diagnostic primer design with the ‘novel region finder’ function in Panseq [60]. Foa race 2, Foa race 4 and the Foci were compared with all genomes included in the whole genome phylogenetic tree. Potential diagnostic loci were then manually compared to sequences on GenBank in the whole genome shotgun database for F. oxysporum and the non-redundant database. Primers were designed with the Primer3Plus software (, analyzed in silico, and empirically tested with DNA from the following (Additional file 18): Six Foa race 1, twenty-two Foa race 2, one Foa race 3 type, twelve Foa race 4, eight pathogenic isolates from coriander, one non-pathogenic isolate that had the same two-locus haplotype as a Foa race 1 isolate, 18 non-pathogenic isolates that had the same two-locus haplotype as the Foa race 2, 19 non-pathogenic FOSC from celery, six non-pathogenic F. commune from celery, and 21 isolates from hosts other than celery or coriander. We used the 772 isolates in the GenBank Fusarium whole genome shotgun database to determine in silico if amplicons of interest were present. Because we had both DNA extracts and whole genome sequences from 12 of the 21 hosts other than celery or coriander, we were able to confirm that all of these in silico and empirical results concurred. Primers for elongation factor 1α (EF1/EF2) and/or rDNA (ITS1F/ITS4) were used as a positive control for amplification [3].

Conidial and hyphal anastomosis experiments

Experiments testing for hyphal anastomosis between the F. oxysporum f. sp. apii and coriandrii isolates sequenced in this paper were conducted as described in Henry et al. [61]. Conidial anastomosis tube (CAT) formation was tested for Foa race 4 with either Foci3–2 or Foa race 2 using assays that were modified from those in Kurian et al. [33]. Five to 10-day old microconidia were harvested in water from PDA dishes, poured through a 40 μm mesh sieve, and washed with water. Conidia were then suspended in 10% potato dextrose broth (PDB) (1.25 X 106 conidia/ml) and incubated for 3 h on a vertical rotary wheel in order to facilitate subsequent staining in wheat germ agglutinin (WGA). After conidia were again washed in water and poured through a 40 μm sieve, conidia were stained with WGA conjugated to either 20 μg Alexa Fluor 488 /ml water or to 24 μg Alexa Fluor 594/ml water (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). After 35 min on the rotary wheel, the conidia were precipitated by centrifugation and washed with 50 mM MgCl2 six times. After a PAP pen was used to delimit a one cm diam circle, a total of 9 X 104 conidia in a 1:1 mixture of two strains of conidia, each with a different dye, in 70 μl of 0.25% PDB and 25 mM NaNO3, pH 5.4, were deposited within the circle, and incubated in a humid chamber at 25 °C for 14 to 16 h. After wicking off moisture, cells were mounted in 75% glycerol.

CATs were evaluated with a 40X objective with differential interference contrast on a Leica DM500B epifluorescent microscope with GFP and rhodamine filters. Before scoring, the conidia of all CATs were carefully checked with both filters. Based on the fluorescent labels, CATs were classified as either hetero-CATs between two different strains or as one of the two types of homo-CATs with the same strain. Conidia that were either unstained or that were too clumped to be evaluated were not categorized. For each microscopic field of view in which there was at least one CAT that could be classified into one of the three categories, we recorded all score-able CATs and the total number of conidia with each of the two labels. Because there are twice the number of potential hetero-CATs as each type of homo-CAT in a 1:1 mixture of two strains, and because there were some deviations from the 1:1 mixture, CATs were quantified as a normalized fraction of the maximum number of potential CATs in the field of view. For each field of view, if A = number of conidia of one strain and B = number of conidia of the other strain, the number of hetero-CATs in that field was normalized by dividing by AB, which is the number of possible hetero-CATs. The number of homo-CATs was normalized by dividing by (A*(A-1))/2 and (B*(B-1))/2, respectively, i.e., the numbers of the possible homo-CATs.

Each experiment was conducted as three independent trials with statistically identical conclusions. Pooled trial results are shown; these represent a total of 102 fields of view with 741 CATs in the mixture of FoaR4 and Foci, and 83 fields of view with 695 CATs with FoaR4 and FoaR2. Because the frequencies are not normally distributed, we used a Kruskal-Wallis rank sums test, and when P < 0.05, a Steel-Dwass nonparametric multiple comparison for all pairs in JMP Pro 14 (SAS Institute).

Images of CATs in Fig. 6 were captured with a 63X oil objective with differential interference contrast (DIC) on a Leica SP8 confocal microscope with GFP and rhodamine epifluorescent filters and z-stack capabilities. Overlay projections were made with Leica LAS X software. We note that some fuzziness in the images is the result of using DIC on spores on polystyrene; polystyrene is better than glass for inducing CATs, but is not ideal for DIC.

Availability of data and materials

The Whole Genome Shotgun projects have been deposited as assemblies at DDBJ/ENA/GenBankas JAAOOQ000000000 for Foa race 4, JAAOOP000000000 for Foa race 3, JAAOOO000000000 for Foa race 2, JAAOON000000000 for Foci3–2, and JAAOOM000000000 for FociGL306 (Table 2). The version described in this paper is v1. The BioProject is PRJNA591157 with BioSamples SAMN13353346 and SAMN13353348-SAMN13353351. The PacBio reads are available from the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accessions: SRR10566868 - SRR10566878 (Foci) and SRR10533047-SRR10533072 (Foa). Illumina whole genome shotgun sequence reads are available from the SRA under accession numbers SRR10662418-SRR10662424. The TagSeq reads are available from the SRA under accessions SRR11347464 through SRR11347501. Much of the data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files. Other data and materials are available from the corresponding author.

Other DNA and predicted amino acid sequence data that was used in this research was obtained from and is available from GenBank at NCBI using the accession numbers shown in either the main text, Materials and Methods, or Additional files. Sequences for the phylogenomic study were obtained from!/eukaryotes/707/ and!/eukaryotes/Fusarium%20odoratissimum. Additional file 19 has a list of the whole genome sequenced F. oxysporum and Fusarium spp. in the GenBank wgs database as of September 30, 2020.



Benchmarking universal single-copy orthologs


Conidial anastomosis tubes

Foa :

Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. apii

Foci :

Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. coriandrii


Fusarium oxysporum species complex


Secreted in xylem 1


Transposable elements


  1. Snyder WC, Hansen HN. The species concept in Fusarium. Am J Bot. 1940;27:64–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. O’Donnell K, Gueidan C, Sink S, Johnston PR, Crous PW, Glenn A, et al. A two-locus DNA sequence database for typing plant and human pathogens within the Fusarium oxysporum species complex. Fungal Genet Biol. 2009;46:936–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Epstein L, Kaur S, Chang PL, Carrasquilla-Garcia N, Lyu G, Cook DR, et al. Races of the celery pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. apii are polyphyletic. Phytopathology. 2017;107:463–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ma L-J, van der Does HC, Borkovich KA, Coleman JJ, Daboussi M-J, Di Pietro A, et al. Comparative genomics reveals mobile pathogenicity chromosomes in Fusarium. Nature. 2010;464:367–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Vlaardingerbroek I, Beerens B, Schmidt SM, Cornelissen BJC, Rep M. Dispensable chromosomes in Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Mol Plant Pathol. 2016;17:1455–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Nelson R, Coons GH, Cochran LC. The Fusarium yellows disease of celery (Apium graveolens L. var. dulce DC.). Tech Bull Mich Agric Exp Stn. 1937;155:1–74.

  7. Puhalla JE. Classification of strains of Fusarium oxysporum on the basis of vegetative compatibility. Can J Bot. 1985;63:179–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Otto HW, Paulus AO, Snyder MJ, Endo RM, Hart LP, Nelson J. A crown rot of celery. Calif Agric. 1976;:10–1.

  9. Hart L, Endo R. The reappearance of Fusarium yellows of celery in California. Plant Dis Report. 1978;62:138–42.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Puhalla JE. Races of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. apii in California and their genetic interrelationships. Can J Bot. 1984;62:546–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Orton TJ, Hulbert SH, Durgan ME, Quiros CF. UC1, Fusarium yellows-resistant celery breeding line. HortScience. 1984;19:594.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Koike ST, Gordon TR. First report of Fusarium wilt of cilantro caused by Fusarium oxysporum in California. Plant Dis. 2005;89:1130.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Armstrong GM, Armstrong JK. Reflections on the wilt fusaria. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1975;13:95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3210–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brankovics B, van Dam P, Rep M, de Hoog GS, van der Lee TA, Waalwijk C, et al. Mitochondrial genomes reveal recombination in the presumed asexual Fusarium oxysporum species complex. BMC Genomics. 2017;18:735.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ayhan DH, López-Díaz C, Pietro AD, Ma L-J. Improved assembly of reference genome Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici strain Fol4287. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2018;7.

  17. Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT. Progressivemauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. Plos One. 2010;5:e11147.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Haubold B, Klötzl F, Pfaffelhuber P. andi: Fast and accurate estimation of evolutionary distances between closely related genomes. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:1169–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol I, Connors J, Gascoyne R, Horsman D, et al. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009;19:1639–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Lohman BK, Weber JN, Bolnick DI. Evaluation of TagSeq, a reliable low-cost alternative for RNAseq. Mol Ecol Resour. 2016;16:1315–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ma L-J, Shea T, Young S, Zeng Q, Kistler HC. Genome sequence of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis strain NRRL 26406, a fungus causing wilt disease on melon. Genome Announc. 2014;2:e00730–14 2/4/e00730–14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Fokkens L, Guo L, Dora S, Wang B, Ye K, Sánchez-Rodríguez C, et al. A chromosome-scale genome assembly for the Fusarium oxysporum strain Fo5176 to establish a model Arabidopsis -fungal pathosystem. Preprint Genomics. 2020.

  23. Armitage AD, Taylor A, Sobczyk MK, Baxter L, Greenfield BPJ, Bates HJ, et al. Characterisation of pathogen-specific regions and novel effector candidates in Fusarium oxysporum f sp cepae. Sci Rep. 2018;8:13530.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rep M, Does HCVD, Meijer M, Wijk RV, Houterman PM, Dekker HL, et al. A small, cysteine-rich protein secreted by Fusarium oxysporum during colonization of xylem vessels is required for I-3-mediated resistance in tomato. Mol Microbiol. 2004;53:1373–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gawehns F, Ma L, Bruning O, Houterman PM, Boeren S, Cornelissen BJC, et al. The effector repertoire of Fusarium oxysporum determines the tomato xylem proteome composition following infection. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6.

  26. Li E, Wang G, Xiao J, Ling J, Yang Y, Xie B. A SIX1 Homolog in Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. conglutinans is required for full virulence on cabbage. Plos One. 2016;11:e0152273.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Czislowski E, Fraser-Smith S, Zander M, O’Neill WT, Meldrum RA, Tran-Nguyen LTT, et al. Investigation of the diversity of effector genes in the banana pathogen, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense, reveals evidence of horizontal gene transfer. Mol Plant Pathol. 2018;19:1155–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schmidt SM, Lukasiewicz J, Farrer R, van Dam P, Bertoldo C, Rep M. Comparative genomics of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis reveals the secreted protein recognized by the Fom-2 resistance gene in melon. New Phytol. 2016;209:307–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. van Dam P, Rep M. The distribution of miniature impala elements and SIX genes in the Fusarium genus is suggestive of horizontal gene transfer. J Mol Evol. 2017;85:14–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Vlaardingerbroek I, Beerens B, Rose L, Fokkens L, Cornelissen BJC, Rep M. Exchange of core chromosomes and horizontal transfer of lineage-specific chromosomes in Fusarium oxysporum. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18:3702–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shahi S, Beerens B, Bosch M, Linmans J, Rep M. Nuclear dynamics and genetic rearrangement in heterokaryotic colonies of Fusarium oxysporum. Fungal Genet Biol. 2016;91:20–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Beckman CH. The nature of wilt diseases of plants. St. Paul, MN: APS Press; 1987. Accessed 28 Aug 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kurian S, Di Pietro A, Read N. Live-cell imaging of conidial anastomosis tube fusion during colony initiation in Fusarium oxysporum. PLoS One. 2018;13:1–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ishikawa FH, Souza EA, Shoji J, Connolly L, Freitag M, Read ND, et al. Heterokaryon incompatibility is suppressed following conidial anastomosis tube fusion in a fungal plant pathogen. PLoS One. 2012;7:e31175.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Henry PM, Pastrana AM, Leveau JHJ, Gordon TR. Persistence of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. fragariae in soil through asymptomatic colonization of rotation crops. Phytopathology. 2019;109:770–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. van der Does HC, Duyvesteijn RGE, Goltstein PM, van Schie CCN, Manders EMM, Cornelissen BJC, et al. Expression of effector gene SIX1 of Fusarium oxysporum requires living plant cells. Fungal Genet Biol. 2008;45:1257–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Widinugraheni S, Niño-Sánchez J, van der Does HC, van Dam P, García-Bastidas FA, Subandiyah S, et al. A SIX1 homolog in Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cubense tropical race 4 contributes to virulence towards Cavendish banana. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0205896.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Thatcher LF, Gardiner DM, Kazan K, Manners JM. A highly conserved effector in Fusarium oxysporum is required for full virulence on Arabidopsis. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2012;25:180–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Covey PA, Kuwitzky B, Hanson M, Webb KM. Multilocus analysis using putative fungal effectors to describe a population of Fusarium oxysporum from sugar beet. Phytopathology. 2014;104:886–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Laurence MH, Summerell BA, Liew ECY. Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. canariensis: evidence for horizontal gene transfer of putative pathogenicity genes. Plant Pathol. 2015;64:1068–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. van Dam P, Fokkens L, Schmidt SM, Linmans JHJ, Kistler HC, Ma L-J, et al. Effector profiles distinguish formae speciales of Fusarium oxysporum. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18:4087–102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Williams AH, Sharma M, Thatcher LF, Azam S, Hane JK, Sperschneider J, et al. Comparative genomics and prediction of conditionally dispensable sequences in legume–infecting Fusarium oxysporum formae speciales facilitates identification of candidate effectors. BMC Genomics. 2016;17:191.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Taylor A, Vágány V, Jackson AC, Harrison RJ, Rainoni A, Clarkson JP. Identification of pathogenicity-related genes in Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cepae. Mol Plant Pathol. 2016;17:1032–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Simbaqueba J, Catanzariti A-M, González C, Jones DA. Evidence for horizontal gene transfer and separation of effector recognition from effector function revealed by analysis of effector genes shared between cape gooseberry- and tomato-infecting formae speciales of Fusarium oxysporum. Mol Plant Pathol. 2018;19:2302–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Urquhart AS, Idnurm A. Limitations of transcriptome-based prediction of pathogenicity genes in the plant pathogen Leptosphaeria maculans. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2019;366.

  46. Badet T, Croll D. The rise and fall of genes: origins and functions of plant pathogen pangenomes. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2020;56:65–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Schmidt SM, Houterman PM, Schreiver I, Ma L, Amyotte S, Chellappan B, et al. MITEs in the promoters of effector genes allow prediction of novel virulence genes in Fusarium oxysporum. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Kaur S, Pham, Q. A., and Epstein, L. High quality DNA from Fusarium oxysporum conidia suitable for library preparation and long read sequencing with PacBio. 2017. doi:

  49. Testa AC, Hane JK, Ellwood SR, Oliver RP. CodingQuarry: highly accurate hidden Markov model gene prediction in fungal genomes using RNA-seq transcripts. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:170.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Tarailo-Graovac M, Chen N. Using RepeatMasker to identify repetitive elements in genomic sequences. Curr Protoc Bioinforma. 2009;25:4.10.1–4.10.14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with burrows–wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:589–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:841–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for statistical Computing; 2018.

  56. Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. N.Y: Springer-Verlag; 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  57. Yu D, Tang H, Zhang Y, Du Z, Yu H, Chen Q. Comparison and improvement of different methods of RNA isolation from strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa). J Agric Sci. 2012;4:p51.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:139–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Laing C, Buchanan C, Taboada EN, Zhang Y, Kropinski A, Villegas A, et al. Pan-genome sequence analysis using Panseq: an online tool for the rapid analysis of core and accessory genomic regions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:461.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Henry PM, Kirkpatrick SC, Islas CM, Pastrana AM, Yoshisato JA, Koike ST, et al. The population of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. fragariae, cause of Fusarium wilt of strawberry, in California. Plant Dis. 2017;101:550–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Ming-Cheng Luo and Tingting Zhu at the University of California at Davis for the Bionano analysis, the UC Davis Genome Center for library preparation and sequencing for PacBio and RNATagSeq, F. Martin for some Illumina sequencing, M. Rep for sharing protocols for DNA and RNA purification, S. Bassein for statistical guidance, H. Doan for igs sequences of some Foci, and E. Ling for technical assistance. The mention of firm names or trade products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the US Department of Agriculture over other firms or similar products not mentioned. The USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.


The California Celery Research Advisory Board, the University of California Hansen Trust, and the UC Davis NIH Shared Instrumentation Grant 1S10OD010786–01 provided funding. The funders had no role in either the study design, analysis and interpretation of data, or in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



PH and LE conceived of the project. SK and OD provided materials. SK, PH, QATP, RB, SB, HH, and OD conducted experiments and collected data under the supervision of SK, PH, and LE. LE and PH acquired the major funding and analyzed the data. LE, PH, SK, and RB wrote the first draft, and LE and PH wrote the final draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynn Epstein.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

Isolate collection

Additional file 2

Virulence of F. oxysporum f. sp. apii (Foa) races in three differential celery cultivars

Additional file 3

Virulence of F. oxysporum f. sp. apii and f. sp. coriandrii in celery and coriander

Additional file 4

Locations of the core genome in the Foa and Foci assemblies

Additional file 5.

Percentage of the 3725 Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO) in Sordariomycetes in the sequenced strains

Additional file 6

A cladogram of the mitochondrial genomes of the Foa, Foci, and 34 FOSC strains

Additional file 7.

The numbers of genes and the sizes of the core and accessory genomes

Additional file 8

Classification of contigs in the Foa race 4 accessory genome as either lineage- or host-specific

Additional file 9

Classification of contigs in the Foci3–2 accessory genome as either lineage- or host-specific

Additional file 10

Conserved synteny of BUSCOs in Foa race 4 and other Foa, Foci and a reference

Additional file 11.

The number of homologs and their synteny in the accessory genomes

Additional file 12

Synteny between FociGL306 and Foa race 4 in the conserved and accessory genomes

Additional file 13

Synteny between the two Foci strains in the conserved and accessory genomes.

Additional file 14

Foa race 4 putative accessory chromosomes: percentage of genes that have homologs in other strains

Additional file 15

Homologs of gene models from Fol4287 chromosome 14 in Foa race 4 and FociGL306

Additional file 16

Up-expressed in planta RNA TagSeq-predicted effectors in Foa race 4: sequences, distribution, and mimp associations

Additional file 17

The percentage identity of the Secreted In Xylem 1 (SIX1) orthologs in the Foa, Foci, and reference strain

Additional file 18

Test of PCR primers for Foa races 2 and 4 and Foci on a diversity of Fusarium spp.

Additional file 19

Whole genome-sequenced Fusarium spp. included in analyses in GenBank wgs

Additional file 20

Diagnostic PCR primers for Foa race 2 haplogroup, Foa race 4, and Foci

Additional file 21

Percentage of the genome with transposons and repeats in Foa, Foci, and the Fol reference

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Henry, P., Kaur, S., Pham, Q.A.T. et al. Genomic differences between the new Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. apii (Foa) race 4 on celery, the less virulent Foa races 2 and 3, and the avirulent on celery f. sp. coriandrii. BMC Genomics 21, 730 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: