Skip to main content
Download PDF

Genomic tools development for Aquilegia: construction of a BAC-based physical map

BMC Genomics volume 11, Article number: 621 (2010) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The genus Aquilegia, consisting of approximately 70 taxa, is a member of the basal eudicot lineage, Ranuculales, which is evolutionarily intermediate between monocots and core eudicots, and represents a relatively unstudied clade in the angiosperm phylogenetic tree that bridges the gap between these two major plant groups. Aquilegia species are closely related and their distribution covers highly diverse habitats. These provide rich resources to better understand the genetic basis of adaptation to different pollinators and habitats that in turn leads to rapid speciation. To gain insights into the genome structure and facilitate gene identification, comparative genomics and whole-genome shotgun sequencing assembly, BAC-based genomics resources are of crucial importance.

Results

BAC-based genomic resources, including two BAC libraries, a physical map with anchored markers and BAC end sequences, were established from A. formosa. The physical map was composed of a total of 50,155 BAC clones in 832 contigs and 3939 singletons, covering 21X genome equivalents. These contigs spanned a physical length of 689.8 Mb (~2.3X of the genome) suggesting the complex heterozygosity of the genome. A set of 197 markers was developed from ESTs induced by drought-stress, or involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis or floral development, and was integrated into the physical map. Among these were 87 genetically mapped markers that anchored 54 contigs, spanning 76.4 Mb (25.5%) across the genome. Analysis of a selection of 12,086 BAC end sequences (BESs) from the minimal tiling path (MTP) allowed a preview of the Aquilegia genome organization, including identification of transposable elements, simple sequence repeats and gene content. Common repetitive elements previously reported in both monocots and core eudicots were identified in Aquilegia suggesting the value of this genome in connecting the two major plant clades. Comparison with sequenced plant genomes indicated a higher similarity to grapevine (Vitis vinifera) than to rice and Arabidopsis in the transcriptomes.

Conclusions

The A. formosa BAC-based genomic resources provide valuable tools to study Aquilegia genome. Further integration of other existing genomics resources, such as ESTs, into the physical map should enable better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying adaptive radiation and elaboration of floral morphology.

Background

Recent progress in genomic research using the model species A. thaliana and crop species, such as rice, maize, sorghum and tomato, has dramatically enhanced our capacity to unravel the genetic basis of biological diversity and the evolution of complex traits and genetic pathways in plants. These include genes and pathways determining plant architecture and fruit size [1, 2], flowering time [3–6], light response [7, 8] and plant defence [9]. However, when studying fundamentals about how organisms have adapted to their natural environments, the information derived especially from crops is of limited application. In these species, many of the traits have undergone intensive artificial selection over the course of directed genetic improvement. In addition, these plant species are often highly inbred due to either artificial selection or self-pollination, which may lead to an increased likelihood of accumulating deleterious alleles, and consequently the loss of atypical patterns of much of the genetic variation displayed in natural systems [10, 11]. It is, therefore, critical to identify and develop new model species from natural settings, with well-defined ecologies and abundant examples of adaptation to various environments to advance our understanding of plant evolution, development and ecology.

Several important factors need to be carefully weighed when choosing new model species to develop tools for genomic studies [12, 13]. First, it is desirable that the new systems encompass a wide range of morphological and ecological diversity occurring in the flowering plants. This will not only allow understanding of the morphological variation in response to critical phenomena, but also facilitate investigation of the physiological adaptation to new environments. Second, with the information accumulated from the increasing number of model systems within grasses (e.g., rice, maize, sorghum, and Brachypodium distachyon) and core eudicots (e.g., Arabidopsis, Medicago, tomato, and Mimulus), the development of phylogenetically intermediate model systems would greatly facilitate genome comparisons among these taxa and bridge the deep evolutionary distance between the well-developed Arabidopsis and rice model systems [13, 14]. Third, it is ideal that genetic resources developed for new model systems could be transferable to a wide-range of related species, serving to address many questions for the community at large [13].

Aquilegia, the columbine genus [15], is emerging as a new evolutionary genomic model in a relatively unstudied area of the plant phylogenetic tree, the basal eudicots. Aquilegia species are so closely related that they have been considered a species flock or syngameon [15, 16]. This group was extensively studied by Verne Grant as an interesting example of recent adaptive radiation leading to rapid speciation [16]. Variation in pollinators has apparently driven the evolution of a wide variety of floral morphologies and, along with adaptation to different habitats, likely induced rapid reproductive isolation [16, 17]. Approximately 23 different species in North America emerged in as little as 1-3 million years [18] resulting in little sequence variation in DNA regions such as chloroplast and rDNA [15]. Remarkably, ecologically and morphologically distinct species share the majority of sequence polymorphisms making them difficult to distinguish at the molecular level [17, 19–21], which again suggests that these taxa are of very recent origin. As such, it is not surprising that it has long been known that species of Aquilegia are highly cross-compatible [16] which provides an opportunity for genetic studies across multiple fields such as ecology, physiology and morphology [11, 16, 22, 23]. The feature of cross compatibility not only facilitates the genetic dissection of traits, but also suggests that genomic tools developed from a single species will be readily transferred to a wide range of additional species [24].

Phylogenetically, Aquilegia belongs to the plant family Ranunculaceae, which is a basal-eudicot lineage [23, 25]. This position of being approximately equidistant, evolutionarily, from the current monocot (rice) and core-eudicot (Arabidopsis) model plant systems provides a unique opportunity for comparative studies among angiosperms of sequence information, genome structure, and the conservation/diversification of developmental pathways. For instance, it has been hypothesized that a whole-genome duplication occurred near the base of the eudicot lineage yet Aquilegia, and thus the Ranunculales, appears to have predated this event [26–28]. Moreover, Aquilegia possesses unusual floral morphology such as petaloid sepals, nectar spurs and a recently evolved novel floral organ, the staminodium, not available for study in current model systems [29]. These traits, along with its small genome size (~300 Mb), all support Aquilegia as an important new model for plant development, ecology and evolution.

Here, we report the construction of a physical map of the A. formosa genome using the High Information Content Fingerprinting (HICF) method [30]. A single individual from the wild was used for library construction because inbreeding depression has been found to be exceptionally strong in all species of Aquilegia studied to date [31]. This plant has also been used as a grandparent in a large F2 cross between A. formosa and A. pubescens, which was utilized as the tissue source for a large EST database http://compbio.dfci.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/tgi/gimain.pl?gudb=aquilegia and is being used for QTL mapping. In addition, we integrated a total of 197 markers (many derived from the EST database) by multi-dimensional pool hybridization, and produced BAC end sequences of a minimum tiling path. Thus, the physical map described here integrates across a number of studies and genomic resources for Aquilegia. The physical map and other information presented here will help facilitate the long-range assembly of Aquilegia genome sequence and fine-scale mapping of QTLs as well as comparative genomic studies. Because all species of Aquilegia are highly similar at the genetic level (see above), this resource should be important for genomic studies spanning the entire genus.

Results

BAC library characterization

Two complementary restriction derived large-insert BAC libraries of a single A. formosa plant were used for constructing a physical map. Tissue was collected in the wild along Bishop Creek Inyo Co., CA and sent to Amplicon Express (Pullman, WA) for library construction. This same individual A. formosa plant has been used as a parent to construct an A. formosa × A. pubescens F2 population for genetic mapping and EST sequencing [32]. As summarized in Table 1, the A. formosa Hin dIII BAC library (AF_Bb) has an estimated genome coverage of 15.2X and contains 29,568 clones with an average insert size of 144.6 kb (N = 186). The insert sizes range from 60-300 kb, and 87% of the clones have an insert size of 100 kb or larger. The library has 4.8% empty vector clones. The A. formosa Mbo I BAC library (AF_Bc) has an estimated genome coverage of 13.3X and contains 28,800 clones with an average insert size of 110.9 kb (N = 187). The insert size range is 35-290 kb. The library contains 59.4% clones with insert size of 100 kb or larger, and 0.5% empty vector clones. Other than these two libraries, a third BAC library was constructed from A. coerulea "Goldsmith" ADQ47, which is currently being used for whole genome sequencing at Joint Genome Institute (JGI) for comparative genomic studies. The library was created by partial digestion of high molecular weight genomic DNA with Hind III according to the procedure of Peterson et al.[33]. The library consisted of a total of 47,616 clones with an average insert size of 131 kb to cover 20.7 genome equivalents.

Table 1 Summary of BAC libraries and HICF fingerprinting of BAC clones
Full size table

HICF fingerprinting

A total of 28,728 and 28,393 clones from A. formosa AF_Bb and AF_Bc BAC libraries, respectively, was successfully fingerprinted using HICF method of Luo et al.[30]. The analysis resulted in an average of 83.7 and 78.6 bands per clone for the AF_Bb and AF_Bc libraries, respectively, with an overall average of 81.1 bands per clone (Table 1). Of the 57,121 successfully fingerprinted clones from both libraries, 50,155 were successfully assigned electronic fingerprints with the GenoProfiler [34] software for subsequent assembly using FPC v8.5.3 software [35]. Given 128 kb for the average insert size from both libraries, the clones included in the FPC project represent approximately 21X of Aquilegia genome (1N ≃ 300 Mb) (Table 2).

Table 2 Summary of the Aquilegia physical map constructed by HICF
Full size table

Physical Map Assembly

Fingerprints from both BAC libraries were combined for contig assembly using a tolerance of 3 and a cutoff of 1e-50. The initial assembly resulted in 3,444 contigs containing 39,489 (78.7%) clones and 10,674 singletons. Eight clones were manually removed due to poor fingerprinting. The average Sulston score was 0.879. After using the DQer to break up contigs consisting of more than 10% questionable clones, a consecutive reduction in stringency at 1e-5 for each End-End and Single-End merge using the "clone plus markers (CPM)" function at a tolerance of 3 was performed to reassemble contigs. The final systematic contig assembly was calculated at a cutoff value of 1e-35. Further manual contig merges, based on the results from marker hybridization (as described in "Methods"), were conducted at a cutoff value of 1e-20 and tolerance of 3, and resulted in a total of 832 contigs consisting of 46,216 (92.1%) clones and 3,939 singletons (Table 2). A minimal tiling path (MTP) was selected using default parameters of FPC and 6,505 clones were selected for end sequencing.

Overgo probe hybridization and marker integration

To bridge genetic and physical maps and isolate a list of genes implicated in environmental adaptations, floral development and color for further studies, overgo probes were developed from (a) a list of markers that had been genetically mapped, (b) a list of ESTs expressed upon drought stress, (c) a list of genes potentially related to anthocyanin biosynthesis [36] and (d) a list of genes associated with flower development. Each hybridization experiment included a total of 125 markers assigned in 15 pools and each pool consisted of 25 markers (Figure 1). We considered a "hit" (i.e., positively identified BAC) as one that all three different pools containing a probe produced a clear hybridization signal. This 3-dimentional-pool hybridization approach has the advantage of reducing the number of false positive clones. Results from the first pool hybridization anchored a total of 95 drought-induced genes to the physical map with 79 markers hybridized to a single contig, 10 to two contigs, and only 6 markers to three or more contigs (Table 3). Similarly, the second pool hybridization placed 102 markers on the map and anchored a total of 65 contigs. Among these 102 markers were 87 genetically mapped markers that collectively anchored 54 contigs, covering a total of 76.4 Mb (25.5% genome) (Table 4). Furthermore, most of these markers from the second pool hybridization were mapped to separate contigs, only 14 contigs contained 2 markers, and only 1 contig had 3 markers (Table 5). All the markers, except TC32786, which failed to hybridize, were derived from genes potentially involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis and mapped to different contigs (Table 6). In summary, results from the two hybridization experiments anchored a total of 197 markers to the physical map. Among the markers were 177 markers (90%) mapped to single contigs, 12 (6%) mapped to 2 contigs, and 8 (4%) mapped to multiple (≥3) contigs. Details of all contigs are available from the WebFPC project located at http://www.genome.clemson.edu/physical_maps/aquilegia.

Figure 1
figure1

The three-dimensional pooling strategy. A total of 125 probes were assigned into 15 pools. Each pool contained 25 probes in a 5 × 5 format. Each probe had an unique coordinate, which can be translated from the deconvolution script.

Full size image
Table 3 Statistics for hybridization with drought-stress induced markers
Full size table
Table 4 Summary of the contigs anchored to different linkage groups by mapped genetic markers
Full size table
Table 5 Aquilegia physical contigs mapped by two or more genetic markers from the second pool hybridization
Full size table
Table 6 Aquilegia physical contigs mapped by 16 markers potentially involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis
Full size table

Validation of the contig assembly

Results from marker hybridization were also used to verify the contig assembly because, in theory, all clones that hybridized to a non-repetitive overgo probe are expected to be in the same contig. Alternatively, positive clones could be located at the ends of different contigs that do not have enough overlap to be assembled into a single contig under the stringency used for the analysis. On the other hand, BAC clones from unrelated contigs would be hybridized if an overgo probe happens to contain a repeat. To test these predictions we randomly chose ctg3184 (which contains 166 clones) from among those contigs that had multiple probe hybridizations. Pool hybridization anchored three markers to this contig. The first marker, Aq_SR_ctg_116, hybridized to 5 clones, among which were 4 clones (as labelled in green on the left of the contig in Figure 2) clustered in this contig, and the fifth clone was not included in the FPC project due to failed fingerprint. The second marker, Aq_SR_ctg_92, hybridized to 9 clones, of which 6 clones (Figure 2, labelled in violet) were neighbouring to each other in this contig, and of the remaining 3 clones 2 were singletons (AF__Bc070E01 and AF__Bc006O01) and 1 clone (AF__Bc044O24) did not fingerprint. The third marker, Aq_SR_ctg_97, resulted in 9 positive hits that were all clustering next to each other in this contig (Figure 2, green clones on the right). Furthermore, hybridization with the overgo probe derived from the T7-primed BAC end sequence of AF__Bb010H19f (Figure 2, labelled in salmon orange) from the same contig identified 8 clones, 5 of which were also next to each other in this contig (Figure 2, light blue-labelled clones). The remaining 3 BACs not in this contig were (a) 1 clone not included in the project due to the failed fingerprint and (b) 2 clones located at the very two ends of another contig, ctg318 (Figure 3, blue-labelled clones), possibly due to the presence of low copy homologous sequence shared with the probe. Thus, the hybridization results were consistent with and in support of the contig assembly, which is based on the fingerprint similarity of the BACs.

Figure 2
figure2

Contig3184 of the A. formosa FPC build. A total of 4 (labelled in green on the left), 6 (labelled in violet in the middle) and 9 (labelled in green on the right) BACs were positively hybridized to marker Aq_SR_ctg_116, Aq_SR_ctg_92 and Aq_SR_ctg_97, respectively. These BACs were neighbouring to each other in three clusters in association with corresponding markers. Hybridization of the BAC library with the probe derived from the BAC end sequence, AF_Bb010H19f (labelled in salmon orange) identified 8 BACs, five of which were also clustered in this contig as marked in light blue. Only AF_Bc library was used for the hybridization experiment.

Full size image
Figure 3
figure3

Contig318 of the A. formosa FPC build. Hybridization of the BAC library AF_Bc with the probe derived from the BAC end sequence, AF_Bb010H19f (labelled in salmon orange in Figure 2) also identified 2 clones at the ends of ctg318 (labelled in blue) possibly due to the presence of low copy homologous sequence shared with the probe.

Full size image

In another independent validation analysis, oligo primers were designed from a set of 8 markers for PCR amplification on all positively hybridized clones. As summarized in Table 7, other than Aq_SR_Ctg_8 and Aq_SR_Ctg_133, which only gave 10/12 and 3/4 successful PCR amplifications, respectively, the remaining 6 markers allowed amplification of expected amplicons from all positive clones. For example, overgo marker Aq_SR_Ctg_30 derived from an ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 homolog hybridized to 8 positive BACs, and PCR analysis using a gene-specific primer pair generated matching amplicons from all these 8 positive clones, confirming the potential presence of the gene in these clones. The results were also consistent with the contig assembly in which 7 of the 8 clones were assembled in a patch in ctg567 (Figure 4, green-labeled clones) while the absence of the last BAC was due to failed HICF fingerprinting of the clone, which in turn excluded the clone from the framework physical map. In summary, a physical map was constructed through 3 major steps. First, an initial build was generated under high stringency with a Sulston score at 0.879. Second, contigs were further connected through a series of automated merges utilizing consecutive stepping-down stringencies from 1e-50 to 1e-35. Third, the physical map was further analyzed by manual editing of the contigs at lower cutoff at 1e-20 and tolerance at 3 according to marker hybridization data and an increased requirement for three end clone matches. The fidelity of the contig build could be confirmed by two sequence-based approaches, including (a) identification of neighbouring clones by hybridization with probes derived from BAC-end sequence of the same contig, and (b) analysis of the PCR amplicons generated from positively hybridized clones.

Table 7 Verification of FPC contig assembly by PCR amplicons designed hybridization markers.
Full size table
Figure 4
figure4

Verification of FPC build. Hybridization of the AF_BC BAC library with marker Aq_SR_ctg_30 (as highlighted in blue) identified 8 clones. Of these 8 clones were 7 clones (highlighted in green) in Ctg567 based on the FPC assembly. The remaining 1 clone did not have HICF data in the FPC and was therefore not seen in the build. All of these 8 clones generated amplicon of the expected size.

Full size image

BAC end sequencing

BAC end sequencing from both forward and reverse directions of 6,505 BACs covering a minimal tiling path of the physical framework generated a total of 12,086 (93% success) high quality sequences (at least 100 contiguous bases ≥ phred20) with an average length of 567 bases. This was equivalent to one sequence tag per 24.8 kb (considering the genome size of 300 Mb). After filtering for vector contamination and trimming for quality, the BESs were deposited in GenBank's GSS sequence repository: library AF_Bb has accessions ER936645-ER942217 and library AF_Bc has accessions ER967023-ER973759. Comparison of the BESs to multiple plant chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes indicated a low level of plastid-origin BACs, 0.2% for each organelle. The BAC sequences, excluding those of putative plastid origins, encompass 6,834,517 base pairs, which corresponds to approximately 2.3% of the Aquilegia genome [23].

The BAC end sequences have an average GC content of 37.6%. Microsatellites were identified from 2,091 BESs, and primers could be designed to flank 1,630 of the SSRs. These putatively mappable markers include 570 dinucleotide repeats, 550 trinucleotide repeats, 525 tetranucleotide repeats, and 177 pentanucleotide repeats.

A set of 1,729 sequences matched known transposable elements. Considering only the best matching element for each BAC end sequence, the most commonly matched species from the database was grapevine (V. vinifera) with 414 BAC ends having matches to grapevine elements. The matches encompassed 66 different repetitive elements including multiple members of the gypsy, copia, MuDR and En/Spm classes. These matches had an average Smith-Waterman score of 682. The next most common organisms for matches consisted of A. thaliana (370 BAC ends to 76 elements, score of 662), Populus trichocarpa (296 BAC ends to 43 elements, score of 878), followed by Medicago truncatula (166 BAC ends to 59 elements, score of 577), and Oryza sativa (143 BAC ends to 57 elements, score of 430).

The most commonly identified individual element was Atlantys1_1 that matched 143 A. formosa BAC ends. Atlantys1_1 represents an internal coding segment of the larger Atlantys endogenous retrovirus in the Ty3-gypsy family. This family is widespread across plants; Atlantys accounts for much of the genome size variation in rice [37] and also has RepBase records originating from A. thaliana, Lotus japonicus, and Sorghum bicolor. Other commonly identified elements include copia42-PTR_I, an LTR retrotransposon from Populus matching 83 BAC ends; POPGY1_I, the internal portion of a Gypsy-type retroelement matching 64 BAC ends; and Copia-31-lTR_VV, a LTR retrotransposon from V. vinifera matching 60 BAC ends (Additional file 1)

After filtration of organelle, transposable elements and repetitive sequences, the remaining BESs were assembled with CAP3 [38] followed by mining for potential gene coding regions. The assembly resulted in 8,140 singlets and 458 contigs. Two different strategies were used to identify potential coding regions in the unique sequences. In the first approach, the non-redundant dataset was compared to the tentative Aquilegia consensus EST sequences from the Gene Index Project [39] with tblastx [40] at a stringency of 1e-25. The results indicated 2,488 of the genomic sequences have at least one EST match. As the EST resource represented only an imperfect representation of the transcriptome, a BLASTX of Arabidopsis, Oryza and Vitis gene models was further performed with a cut-off E value of 1e-25 in the second approach, resulting in an additional 750, 337 and 921 potential coding non-redundant BAC ends, respectively. Of the 8598 non-redundant sequences, 2,782 (23% of the total 12,086 BESs) were flagged as potential coding regions.

An overall comparison to three plant model genomes was performed by a blastn [40] of all the BESs to the whole genome sequences with an E-value cut-off of 1e-10. Aquilegia sequences exhibited relatively low similarity to A. thaliana and O. sativa with only 348 and 245 matches, respectively, while there were 906 matches with V. vinifera genome (Figure 5). The results provided the first global sequence information to support the phylogenetic placement of Aquilegia in angiosperms, and the observation from the shared transposable element between Aquilegia and the grapevine further reiterates the close colineage between these two clades. The fact that Aquilegia genome contains transposable elements similar to both monocot and eudicot species also highlights the uniqueness of Aquilegia in studying plant evolution. We identified 906 Aquilegia BAC-end sequences that aligned with one or more of the 19 chromosome-based pseudomolecules of the Vitis genome (Additional file 2) and 207 sequences aligned to unanchored Vitis genomic sequence. The alignment of the 906 Aquilegia BESs to the corresponding chromosome-based pseudomolecules of Vitis genome was summarized in Table 8. Using the series of synteny mapping algorithms, we mapped 54 blocks of synteny to the V. vinifera draft genome assembly (Figure 6).

Figure 5
figure5

Results of homology comparison (Venn diagram) of the Aquilegia BESs with 3 model genomes: A. thaliana , O. sativa , and V. vinifera. All BESs were filtered out repeats and transposable elements and compared against the model genomes by blastn search at 1e-10.

Full size image
Table 8 Comparative mapping of Aquilegia and V. vinife r aa
Full size table
Figure 6
figure6

Syntenies shared between Aquilegia and V. vinifera. A total of 54 syntenies, where both pair-end sequences from the same BAC match the same locus in Vitis genome, were identified by SyMAP analysis. The black dots in green Vitis bars indicate all annotated ESTs from the Vitis genome. The blue Aquilegia bars are the Aquilegia contigs that have syntenies aligned to Vitis genome. The name of each contig was described in each bar. The contigs were arranged based on the order of their corresponding orthologs in Vitis genome. The contigs assigned to the same Aquilegia "pseudochromosome" (marked as Aquilegia chr 0) may not overlap each other. There might be gaps among the contigs in the same "pseudochromosome". The purple lines connecting the green Vitis bars and blue Aquilegia bars indicate the match syntenies.

Full size image

Discussion

Aquilegia represents a unique clade of basal eudicots possessing a number of important unique features, including its phylogenetic position in the lower eudicots, unusual floral morphology (e.g., petaloid sepals, nectar spurs and staminodia), and its distribution in diverse ecological habitats. Collectively, all these traits contributed to Aquilegia being developed as a new model system for studying floral variation, adaptive radiations and evolution [23, 32, 36]. To further understand the genome structure and provide molecular insights bridging monocots and eudicots and facilitate molecular dissection of the traits associated with inflorescence development and environmental adaptations, a BAC-based genomic resource, including three BAC libraries and a physical map, was developed in this study. Among the three libraries were two libraries derived from A. formosa, representing 15.2X and 13.3X genome equivalents, respectively, for physical map construction. A third library was constructed from A. coerulea Goldsmith to have 20.7X genome coverage for further comparative genomics studies to address the molecular basis for floral variation and adaptive radiation within the genus. The Aquilegia physical map was composed of 50,155 clones and had a deep 21X genome coverage. Furthermore, a collection of BACs orchestrating a minimal tiling path from the contig assembly were isolated for BAC end sequencing to provide a glimpse of the genome organization of this model plant. Both the physical map and the BESs could also serve as landmarks for genome sequence assembly and anchoring ESTs to the genome. Marker hybridizations using a total of 197 markers associated with drought-stress, anthocyanin biosynthesis and floral development not only allowed integration of genetic map into the contig framework, but also identified candidate genomic regions for further gene isolation and characterization. The genome resource is expected to serve as a pivotal platform for comparative genomics study to elucidate genome variations between monocots and basal eudicot and to provide insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying environment adaptation and floral variations.

In recent years, HICF fingerprinting has been commonly applied to replace traditional agarose [41] and polyacrylamide gel methods [42] in various genome fingerprinting projects due to its high-throughput procedure, increased number of fragments generated from each clone and more improved contig assembly than other approaches [43]. In this study, an average of 81 restriction fragments was generated from the clones in the FPC project. The high-informative fingerprints provided high resolution identity from each clone for accurate contig assembly that can be further verified by marker hybridization in which 189 (96%) of the total 197 genetic markers hybridized to only 1 or 2 contigs instead of scattering around the entire genome. Furthermore, the positively hybridized clones were overlapped in clusters in most contigs, indicating that the contig assembly, which is based on fingerprinting similarity, is consistent with the sequence-based results. The accuracy of contig assembly could also be verified by PCR amplicon analysis as shown in Table 7. Thus, we are confident with the strategy for building a physical map that begins with contig assembly at high stringency at cutoff 1e-50 and tolerance 3, which gave a high average Sulston score of 0.879, followed by a series of End-End and Single-End merges of the small BAC scaffolds under gradually decreased stringency till 1e-35, followed by further manual editing at 1e-20 based on marker hybridization data. Among the successful 197 markers used for the hybridization were 87 markers that have been genetically mapped; these markers anchored a total of 54 contigs that cover 76.4 Mb (25.5% of the genome) on all 7 linkage groups (Table 4). These mapped contigs not only organize a framework to study the Aquilegia genome, but also pave the way for gene isolation and characterization by map-based cloning approach to further understand the genes of interest.

The genes involved in anthocyanin pigmentation biosynthesis in wheat are arranged in a gene cluster in the short arm of chromosome 7 [44–46]. Similar clustering of the genes involved in the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites was also reported from grapevine [47]. Unlike these species, the 16 anthocyanin biosynthesis related genes in Aquilegia appear to be dispersed in the genome (Table 6), suggesting the unique deployment of the genes in this lower eudicot genus. However, a number of additional genes belonging to the anthocyanin and broader flavonoid pathway have been identified [36] but not assayed here, and therefore the possibility cannot be ruled out that some gene clustering might be identified in the future. The contigs anchored from this study could serve as resource for unravelling the molecular basis underlying floral color variation and evolution.

An expansion in the physical span of the contigs was observed in this study. The collective physical span of all contigs as calculated by the CB map function of FPC software [35] was estimated to be 689.8 Mb (~ 2.3X genome size, 1N = 300 Mb). As only 197 marker hybridization results were analyzed and these markers were biased toward specific biological functions, it cannot be ruled out, although unlikely, that the contig assembly is not best optimized and some contigs remain to be further merged together. As the single A. formosa individual used for BAC library construction has been shown to be highly heterozygous at more than 30 SSR and SNP loci (Hodges, unpublished data), the excessive physical length might be due to the heterozygous genome collected from the field that was composed of highly diverse haplotype DNAs as a result of the outcrossing nature of the species. Similar inflated length from physical map has been reported from other outcrossing species, including poplar [48] and grapevine [49]. As the genome sequencing project is near finishing, further assembly and analysis of genome sequence will uncover more details about the genome components and suggest events that took place affecting genome structure of this basal eudicot taxa. To maintain the accuracy in contig assembly, further reduction in stringency to merge more contigs was not pursued in this study. In the future, fingerprint contig assembly can be refined through more hybridizations using additional mapped markers and probes designed from the end clones of contigs.

The BESs from the minimal tiling path clones also provided insights into the genome composition of this novel model plant, including low GC content, transposable elements and gene content. Interestingly, higher homology in putative coding regions shared between Aquilegia and the grapevine, V. vinifera, in comparison to two other model plants, including rice and Arabidopsis was also observed (Figure 5). As Vitis is affiliated with the earliest diverging lineage of rosids in the core eudicots of the angiosperms [50], and Aquilegia is in basal eudicots in the phylogenetic tree [23, 32], the close conservation between these two species not only provides a global molecular evidence to support the phylogenetic lineage that connects basal eudicots to core eudicots but also provides a rich resource for investigating the genome evolution, such as the events of genome duplication and subsequence variation [51–53], in the course from monocots to eudicots in angiosperms. In this report, preliminary comparative genomics studies using SyMAP uncovered 54 syntenic blocks between Aquilegia and Vitis (Figure 6). These syntenies provide a first glimpse of the Aquilegia structural organization and a rich resource to trace the events of DNA translocation during the evolution of these two lineages. Further characterization of the shared transposable elements from the Aquilegia genome will also provide insights into the evolution of plants. More extensive survey using the whole-genome sequence information in the near future is expected to aid in-depth studies into the evolution genomics of the basal eudicot taxa. On the other hand, the discovery that alignment of the BESs from the physical framework contigs failed to identify significant synteny with other reported genomes also reiterates the significance of the unique genome structure of Aquilegia in understanding the evolution of the plant genomes.

Conclusions

The BAC-based genome resource established from this study, including deep genome coverage libraries from A. formosa and A. coerulea, a partially integrated physical map is expected to promote better understanding of the genome structure of the unique intermediate between rice and Arabidopsis. It will also provide tremendous insights into the molecular clues and genetic networks underlying ecological adaption and morphological diversity. Results from the analysis of the BESs derived from the minimal tiling path (MTP) indicated a close similarity in both transposable elements and annotated gene models with the grapevine genome further suggesting the significance of the genome resource in studying the molecular elements involved in the lineage of evolution progression. This genomic resource is expected to facilitate comparative genomics research, gene isolation and characterization to address the unique biological feature of this novel model plant.

Methods

BAC DNA fingerprinting and contig assembly

DNA was isolated from a total of 58,368 clones from both AF_Bb and AF_Bc BAC libraries by following standard alkaline lysis miniprep methods [54], and used for fingerprinting using the HICF method of Luo et al.[30]. The fingerprinting profiles were further processed by GeneMapper 3.7 (Applied Biosystems), GenoProfiler 2.0 [34], and uploaded to FPC v8.5.3 software [35] for contig assembly. To maintain the quality of contig assembly the initial build was processed at high stringency using the cutoff of 1e-50 and a tolerance of 3. The DQer function of the FPC package was performed to break down all contigs with more than 10% of Q clones to reduce false assembly. Further reassembly was conducted by consecutive reductions of the stringency at 1e-5 for the Ends-Ends analysis followed by Single-End analysis until the final cutoff of 1e-35 with tolerance of 3 was reached. The accuracy of the contig assembly was examined by marker hybridization and PCR analysis. Further manual editing of the assembly was conducted based on the following principles: (a) cutoff at 1e-20 and tolerance at 3, (b) for 2 contigs to be merged, the first contig needs to have at least 3 matched clones (matched clones are clones shared at least 41 common bands under the designated stringency) and the second contig needs to have at least 2 matched clones, (c) only 2 matched clones are required for contig merge if these 2 contigs also share the same genetic marker(s),

Overgo design and hybridization

To establish a genome resource from an environmental and ecological model plant to better support gene identification and characterization, a collection of stress-induced genes were first chosen for hybridization to anchor the potential stress-related markers in the physical map. Furthermore, a BAC library from A. coerulea was also included in the hybridization for comparative genomics studies. Briefly, ESTs preferentially up-regulated by drought-stress were generated from subtractive hybridization analysis (Henry, unpublished data). The low complex sequences were further removed by a pipeline composed of Repeat Masker [55] with the RepBase database [56], Cross_Match [57] and Tandem Repeat Finder [58]. The remaining sequences were screened for overgo oligomers by OligoSpawn [59]. A total of 125 pairs of oligomers were synthesized by IDT (Integrated DNA Technologies). Overgo probes were individually labelled by following the procedure of the Clemson University Genomics Institute (CUGI) hybridization protocol http://www.genome.clemson.edu/resources/protocols. An in-house experimental design script http://www.genome.clemson.edu/software/hybdecon/exp_setup was used to assign probes into 15 pools in a 3-dimensional pooling design, with each pool containing 25 probes (Figure 1). All 32-P labelled probes were mixed in their corresponding pools, denatured and added to hybridization against 2 BAC libraries, including the AF_Bb library of A. formosa and a Hind III library of A. coerulea. Hybridization was performed at 60°C for 2 nights. Filters were washed with 1× SSC, 0.1% SDS at 60°C for 30 minutes for 5 times and exposed to phosphor screens, and the images were recorded by a Typhoon 9400 Imager (GE Healthcare, Bio-Sciences). The addresses of the positively hybridized BAC clones were manually scored using the software HybSweeper [60], and subsequently deconvoluted for positive BACs corresponding to each probe with an in-house PERL script Hybdecon http://www.genome.clemson.edu/software/hybdecon. Hybridization results were then incorporated into FPC project to anchor markers into the contig framework.

By following the same procedure, another set of 125 overgo probes was designed from various resources, including 87 mapped markers, 16 genes potentially involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis [36], 12 genes involved in floral development (Kramer, unpublished data) and 10 other SNP markers for additional pool hybridization. Successful markers were integrated into the map. Sequence information of all overgo probes were listed in Additional file 3.

Contig validation by marker hybridization and PCR analysis

For PCR validation, primers were designed from a total of 8 markers randomly chosen from the drought-stress induced ESTs (Table 5). All positively hybridized BACs corresponding to every individual marker were analyzed by PCR amplification. The condition for the PCR reaction was 94°C for 1 min for initial denaturation, followed by 25 cycles of denaturing at 94°C for 15 sec, annealing at 55°C for 30 sec, and extension at 60°C for 60 sec, followed by a final cycle of extension for 10 min. The reagents were PCR kit from Clonetech (Palo Alto, CA). The amplicons were resolved in 1.0% agarose gel and ethidium bromide stained, and the presence/absence of the amplicons of expected sizes were examined.

BAC end sequencing

A total of 6,505 overlapping BAC clones that constituted the minimal tiling path were rearrayed and cultured in 96-well deep plates for DNA isolation, and approximately 300 ng of each individual DNA was used for BAC end sequencing by universal T7 and Sp6 primers for both ends using the "Dye Terminator" chemistry from ABI kit version v3.1 and resolved on ABI3730XL sequencer. In-house quality control software was used to filter and trim raw sequences. The pipeline includes publicly available tools such as Phred [57], Cross_Match [57] and Lucy [61] for base calling and vector masking. Trimmed sequences of less than 100 bp or with greater than 5% N bases were removed. The high quality, trimmed sequences were searched for organelle origin by BLAST [40] against multiple genomes from GenBank: A. thaliana, Nicotiana sylvestris, O. sativa, and Ranunculus macranthus chloroplast genomes and the A. thaliana, N. tobacum, O. sativa and V. vinifera mitochondrial genomes. The software RepeatMasker version 3.2.7 [55] coupling with a RepBase library [56] of all known Viridiplantae repetitive elements was used to identify repeats from the Aquilegia BESs. Classification of the repeat families was based on the annotation in the database. A CUGI PERL script was used to identify microsatellites with at least five dinucleotide, four trinucleotide, three tetranucleotide or three pentanucleotide motifs in a row. Primer3 [62] was used to identify primers surrounding each predicted SSR element.

Synteny mapping

BAC-end sequences anchored to fingerprint contigs were assessed for synteny with the V. vinifera draft genome assembly http://www.plantgdb.org/VvGDB using the SyMAP [63] software. First, repetitive/low-complex motifs were screened and masked with Repeatmasker [55]. Next, BLAT [64] was used to align the FPC sequences (BES and markers) using the nucleotide/nucleotide search mode with a minScore of 30 and a minIdentity of 70.

References

  1. 1.

    Doebley JA, Stec A, Gustus C: teosinte branched 1 and the origin of maize: evidence for epistasis and the evolution of dominance. Genetics. 1995, 141: 333-346.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Frary A, Nesbitt TC, Frary A, Grandillo S, van der Knaap E, Cong B, Liu J, Meller J, Elber R, Alpert KB, Tanksley SD: fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science. 2000, 289: 85-88. 10.1126/science.289.5476.85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    El-Assal SED, Alonso-Blanco C, Peeters AJM, Raz V, Koornneef M: A QTL for flowering time in Arabidopsis reveals a novel allele of CRY2. Nat Genet. 2001, 29: 435-440. 10.1038/ng767.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Simpson GG, Dean C: Flowering - Arabidopsis, the rosetta stone of flowering time?. Science. 2002, 296: 285-289. 10.1126/science.296.5566.285.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Cremer F, Coupland G: Distinct photoperiodic responses are conferred by the same genetic pathway in Arabidopsis and in rice. Trends Plant Sci. 2003, 8: 405-407. 10.1016/S1360-1385(03)00192-4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Gazzani S, Gendall AR, Lister C, Dean C: Analysis of the molecular basis of flowering time variation in Arabidopsis accessions. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132: 1107-1114. 10.1104/pp.103.021212.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Borevitz JO, Maloof JN, Lutes J, Dabi T, Redfern JL, Trainer GT, Werner JD, Asami T, Berry CC, Weigel D, Chory J: Quantitative trait loci controlling light and hormone response in two accessions of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics. 2002, 160: 683-696.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Maloof JN, Borevitz JO: Natural variation in light sensitivity of Arabidopsis. Nat Genet. 2001, 29: 441-446. 10.1038/ng777.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    de Meaux J, Mitchell-Olds T: Evolution of plant resistance at the molecular level: ecological context of species interactions. Heredity. 2003, 91: 345-352. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800342.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bustamante CD, Nielsen R, Sawyer SA, Olsen KM, Purugganan MD, Hartl DL: The cost of inbreeding in Arabidopsis. Nature. 2002, 416: 531-534. 10.1038/416531a.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Remington DL, Purugganan MD: Candidate genes, quantitative trait loci, and functional trait evolution in plants. Int J Plant Sci. 2003, 164: S7-S20. 10.1086/367812.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Feder ME, Mitchell-Olds T: Evolutionary and ecological functional genomics. Nat Reviews Genet. 2003, 4: 651-657. 10.1038/nrm1173.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Abzhanov A, Extavour C, Groover A, Hodges SA, Hoekstra H, Kramer EM, Monteiro A: Are we there yet? Tracking the development of new model systems. Trends Genet. 2008, 24: 353-360. 10.1016/j.tig.2008.04.002.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Pryer KM, Schneider H, Zimmer EA, Banks JA: Deciding among green plants for whole genome studies. Trends Plant Sci. 2003, 7: 550-554. 10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02375-0.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hodges SA, Arnold ML: Columbines: a geographically widespread species flock. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994, 91: 5129-32. 10.1073/pnas.91.11.5129.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hodges SA, Fulton MF, Yang JY, Whitall JB: Verne Grant and evolutionary studies of Aquilegia. New Phytologist. 2003, 161: 113-120. 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00950.x.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Whittall JB, Hodges SA: Pollinator shifts drive increasingly long nectar spurs in columbine flowers. Nature. 2007, 447: 706-709. 10.1038/nature05857.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kay KM, Whittall JB, Hodges SA: A survey of nrITS substitution rates across angiosperms supports an approximate molecular clock with life history effects. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2006, 6: 36-10.1186/1471-2148-6-36.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Whittall JB, Medina-Marine A, Zimmer EA, Hodges SA: Generating single-copy nuclear gene data for a recent adaptive radiation. Mol Phylogenetics Evolution. 2005, 39: 124-134. 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.10.010.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Cooper EA, Whittall JB, Hodges SA, Nordborg M: Genetic variation at nuclear lock fails to distinguish two morphologically distinct species of Aquilegia. PLoS ONE. 2010, 5: e8655-10.1371/journal.pone.0008655.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hodges SA, Arnold ML: Floral and ecological isolation between Aquilegia formosa and Aquilegia pubescens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994, 91: 2493-2496. 10.1073/pnas.91.7.2493.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Schluter D: The ecology of adaptive radiation. 2000, New York, New York, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kramer EM: Aquilegia: A new model for plant development, ecology and evolution. Annu Rev Plant Bio. 2009, 60: 261-77. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.092051.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Fulton TM, van der Hoeven R, Eannetta NT, Tanksley SD: Identification, analysis, and utilization of conserved ortholog set markers for comparative genomics in higher plants. Plant Cell. 2002, 14: 1457-1467. 10.1105/tpc.010479.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Chase MW, Mort CM, Albach DC, Zanis M, Savolainen V, Hahn WH, Hoot SB, Fay MF, Axtell M, Swensen SM, Prince LM, Kress WJ, Nixon KC, Farris JS: Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from a combined data set of 18S rDNA, rbc L, and atp B sequences. Bot J Linn Soc. 2000, 133: 381-461.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Howarth DG, Donoghue MJ: Phylogenetic analysis of the "'ECE" (CYC/TB1) clade reveals duplications predating the core eudicots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103: 9101-9106. 10.1073/pnas.0602827103.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kramer EM, Jaramillo MA, Di Stilio VS: Patterns of gene duplication and functional evolution during the diversification of the AGAMOUS subfamily of MADS-box genes in angiosperms. Genetics. 2004, 166: 1011-1023. 10.1534/genetics.166.2.1011.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kramer EM, Su HJ, Wu JM, Hu JM: A simplified explanation for the frameshift mutation that created a novel C-terminal motif in the APETALA3 gene lineage. BMC Evol Biol. 2006, 6: 30-10.1186/1471-2148-6-30.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Tucker SC, Hodges SA: Floral ontogeny of Aquilegia, Semiaquilegia and Enemion (Ranunculaceae). Int J Plant Sci. 2005, 166: 557-574. 10.1086/429848.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Luo MC, Thomas C, You FM, Hsiao J, Ouyang S, Buell CR, Malandro M, McGuire PE, Anderson OD, Dvorak J: High-throughput fingerprinting of bacterial artificial chromosomes using the SNaPshot labeling kit and sizing of restriction fragments by capillary electrophoresis. Genomics. 2003, 82: 378-389. 10.1016/S0888-7543(03)00128-9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Yang JY, Hodges SA: Early inbreeding depression selects for high outcrossing rates in Aquilegia formosa and Aquilegia pubescens. Int J Plant Sci. 2010, 171: 860-871. 10.1086/655772.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kramer EM, Hodges SA: Aquilegia as a model system for the evolution and ecology of petals. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010, 365: 477-490. 10.1098/rstb.2009.0230.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Peterson DG, Tomkins JP, Frisch DA, Wing RA, Paterson AH: Construction of plant bacterial chromosome (BAC) libraries: An illustrated guide. J Agric Gen. 2000, 5: [http://wheat.Pw.usda.gov/jag/]

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    You FM, Luo MC, Gu YQ, Lazo GR, Deal K, Dvorak J, Anderson OD: GenoProfiler: batch processing of high-throughput capillary fingerprinting data. Bioinformatics. 2007, 23: 240-242. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl494.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Soderlund C, Humphray S, Dunham A, French L: Contigs built with fingerprints, markers, and FPC v4.7. Genome Res. 2000, 10: 1772-1787. 10.1101/gr.GR-1375R.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hodges SA, Derieg NJ: Adaptive radiations: From field to genomic studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106: 9947-9954. 10.1073/pnas.0901594106.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Zuccolo A, Sebastian A, Talag J, Yu Y, Kim H, Collura K, Kudrna D, Wing R: Transposable element distribution, abundance and role in genome size variation in the genus Oryza. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2007, 7: 152-10.1186/1471-2148-7-152.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Huang X, Madan A: CAP3: A DNA sequences assembly program. Genome Res. 1999, 9: 868-877. 10.1101/gr.9.9.868.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Quackenbush J, Liang F, Holt I, Pertea G, Upton J: The TIGR Gene Indices: reconstruction and representation of expressed gene sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28: 141-145. 10.1093/nar/28.1.141.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ: Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990, 215: 403-410.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Marra MA, Kucaba TA, Dietrich NL, Green ED, Brownstein B, Wilson RK, McDonald KM, Hillier LW, McPherson JD, Waterston RH: High throughput fingerprint analysis of large-insert clones. Genome Res. 1997, 7: 1072-1084.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Chang YL, Tao Q, Scheuring C, Ding K, Meksem K, Zhang HB: An integrated map of Arabidopsis thaliana for functional analysis of its genome sequence. Genetics. 2001, 159: 1231-1242.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Nelson WM, Dvorak J, Luo MC, Messing J, Wing RA, Soderlund C: Efficacy of clone fingerprinting methodologies. Genomics. 2007, 89: 160-165. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2006.08.008.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Khlestkina EK, Pshenichnikova TA, Röder MS, Börner A: Clustering anthocyanin pigmentation genes in wheat group 7 chromosomes. Cereal Research Communications. 2009, 37: 391-398. 10.1556/CRC.37.2009.3.8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Khlestkina EK, Röder MS, Pshenichnikova TA, Simonov AV, Salina EA, Börner A: Genes for anthocyanin pigmentation in wheat: review and microsatellite-based mapping. Chromosome mapping research developments. Edited by: Verrity JF, Abbington LE. 2008, NOVA Science Publishers, Inc., USA, 155-175.

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Khlestkina EK, Röder MS, Börner A: Mapping genes controlling anthocyanin pigmentation on the glume and pericarp in tetraploid wheat (Triticum durum L.). Euphytica. 2010, 171: 65-69. 10.1007/s10681-009-9994-4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Fournier-Level A, Cunff LL, Gomez C, Doligez A, Ageorges A, Roux C, Bertrand Y, Souquet JM, Cheynier V, This P: Quantitative genetic bases of anthocyanin variation in grape (Vitis vinifera L. spp. Sativa) Berry: a quantitative trait locus to quantitative trait nucleotide integrated study. Genetics. 2009, 183: 1127-1139. 10.1534/genetics.109.103929.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Kelleher CT, Chiu R, Chin H, Bosdet IE, Krzywinski MI, et al: A physical map of the highly heterozygous Populus genome: integration with the genome sequence and genetic map and analysis of haplotype variation. Plant J. 2007, 50: 1063-1078. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03112.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Moroldo M, Paillard S, Marconi R, Fabrice L, Aurelie Canaguier A, Corinne Cruaud5, De Berardinis V, Guichard C, Brunaud V, Le Clainche I, Scalabrin S, Testolin R, Di Gaspero G, Morgante M, Adam-Blondon AF: A physical map of the heterozygous grapevine 'Cabernet Sauvignon' allows mapping candidate genes for disease resistance. BMC Plant Biology. 2008, 8: 66-10.1186/1471-2229-8-66.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Jansen RK, Kaittanis C, Saski C, Lee SB, Tomkins J, Alverson AJ, Daniell H: Phylogenetic analyses of Vitis (Vitaceae) based on complete chloroplast genome sequences: effects of taxon sampling and phylogenetic methods on resolving relationships among rosids. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2006, 6: 32-10.1186/1471-2148-6-32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Vision TJ, Brown DG, Tanksley SD: The origins of genomic duplications in Arabidopsis. Science. 2000, 290: 2114-17. 10.1126/science.290.5499.2114.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Chapman BA: Ancient polyploidization predating divergence of the cereals, and its consequences for comparative genomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 9903-9908. 10.1073/pnas.0307901101.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    De Bodt S, Maere S, Van de Peer Y: Genome duplication and the origin of angiosperms. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005, 20: 591-97. 10.1016/j.tree.2005.07.008.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Sambrook J, Fitsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 1989, Cold Spring Harbor, Cold Spring Harbor Press

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Smit AFA, Hubley R, Green P: RepeatMasker Open-3.0. 1996, [http://www.repeatmasker.org]

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Jurka J, Kapitonov VV, Pavlicek A, Klonowski P, Kohany O, Walichiewicz J: Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogent Genome Res. 2005, 110: 462-467. 10.1159/000084979.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Gordon D, Abajian C, Green P: Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 1998, 8: 195-202.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Benson G: Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27: 573-580. 10.1093/nar/27.2.573.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Zheng J, Svensson JT, Madishetty K, Close TJ, Jiang T, Lonardi S: OligoSpawn: a software tool for the design of overgo probes from large unigene datasets. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006, 7: 7-10.1186/1471-2105-7-7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Lazo GR, Lui N, Gu YQ, Kong X, Coleman-Derr K, Anderson OD: Hybsweeper: a resource for detecting high-density plate gridding coordinates. Biotechniques. 2005, 39: 320-324. 10.2144/05393BM05.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Chou HH, Holmes MH: DNA sequence quality trimming and vector removal. Bioinformatics. 2001, 17: 1093-104. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1093.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Rozen S, Skaletsky H: Primer3 on the www for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol Biol. 2000, 132: 365-386.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Soderlund C, Nelson W, Shoemaker A, Paterson A: SyMAP: A system for discovering and viewing syntenic regions of FPC maps. Genome Res. 2006, 16: 1159-1168. 10.1101/gr.5396706.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Kent WJ: BLAT-The BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res. 2002, 12: 656-664.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation grant EF-0412727 to SAH, JPT and HL and a UCSB faculty research grant to SAH, and in part by a grant from NIFA/USDA, under project number SC-1700315 to HL. The authors also thank Dr. Elena Kramer who provided the floral development markers. This is technical contribution no. 5811 of the Clemson Experiment Station.

Author information

Author notes

    Affiliations

    1. Department of Genetics and Biochemistry, Clemson University, 100 Jordan Hall, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA

      Guang-Chen Fang, David C Henry & Hong Luo

    2. Clemson University Genomics Institute, Clemson University, Biosystems Research Complex, 51 New Cherry Street, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA

      Barbara P Blackmon, Margaret E Staton, Christopher A Saski & Jeff P Tomkins

    3. Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA

      Scott A Hodges

    Authors
    1. Guang-Chen Fang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Barbara P Blackmon
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. David C Henry
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Margaret E Staton
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Christopher A Saski
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Scott A Hodges
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Jeff P Tomkins
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    8. Hong Luo
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Hong Luo.

    Additional information

    Authors' contributions

    GF and BPB contributed equally to the major part of the study. DCH performed subtractive hybridization for drought-stress marker identification, BAC end sequencing and contig validation. MES performed all bioinformatic analysis. CAS helped with SyMAP analysis and discussion. SAH provided the A. formosa libraries and the genetically mapped and anthocyanin biosynthesis marker information. JPT and HL coordinated the project and HL drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final draft of the manuscript.

    Guang-Chen Fang, Barbara P Blackmon contributed equally to this work.

    Electronic supplementary material

    The top 16 most common repetitive elements in

    Additional file 1: A. formosa BESs identified. The transposable elements were identified from Aquilegia BESs using RepeatMasker coupling with a RepBase library of all known Viridiplantae repetitive elements. The elements were listed according to the number of reads of each element in a descending order as described in column 4. (DOC 42 KB)

    Identification of syntenies between

    Additional file 2: A. formosa and V. vinifera genomes. BESs were compared with V. vinifera genome using the cutoff at 1e-10 and the matches were listed in the table. Aquilegia framework contig and BAC were listed in column 1, the number of BACs in the corresponding contig was listed in column 2, putative gene function of the annotated Vitis ortholog was described in column 3, and linkage group where the Vitis ortholog is located was described in column 4. (DOC 716 KB)

    Additional file 3:Spread sheet of the detail sequence information of the overgo probes used in this study. The probes with the nomenclature of Aq_SR_ctg and AHOTEg were derived from drought stress ESTs, while the TC probes were from a list of genes potentially involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis or floral development. To generate the probes, marker sequences were processed through a pipeline composed of RepeatMasker, Cross-Match and Tandem Repeat Finder to remove low complex sequence regions before screening for overgo oligomers by OligoSpawn. (XLS 64 KB)

    Authors’ original submitted files for images

    Rights and permissions

    This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

    Reprints and Permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Fang, G., Blackmon, B.P., Henry, D.C. et al. Genomic tools development for Aquilegia: construction of a BAC-based physical map. BMC Genomics 11, 621 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-621

    Download citation

    Keywords

    • Anthocyanin Biosynthesis
    • Average Insert Size
    • Contig Assembly
    • Comparative Genomic Study
    • Minimal Tiling Path

    BMC Genomics

    ISSN: 1471-2164

    Contact us