Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Computational identification of transcriptionally co-regulated genes, validation with the four ANT isoform genes



The analysis of gene promoters is essential to understand the mechanisms of transcriptional regulation required under the effects of physiological processes, nutritional intake or pathologies. In higher eukaryotes, transcriptional regulation implies the recruitment of a set of regulatory proteins that bind on combinations of nucleotide motifs. We developed a computational analysis of promoter nucleotide sequences, to identify co-regulated genes by combining several programs that allowed us to build regulatory models and perform a crossed analysis on several databases. This strategy was tested on a set of four human genes encoding isoforms 1 to 4 of the mitochondrial ADP/ATP carrier ANT. Each isoform has a specific tissue expression profile linked to its role in cellular bioenergetics.


From their promoter sequence and from the phylogenetic evolution of these ANT genes in mammals, we constructed combinations of specific regulatory elements. These models were screened using the full human genome and databases of promoter sequences from human and several other mammalian species. For each of transcriptionally regulated ANT1, 2 and 4 genes, a set of co-regulated genes was identified and their over-expression was verified in microarray databases.


Most of the identified genes encode proteins with a cellular function and specificity in agreement with those of the corresponding ANT isoform. Our in silico study shows that the tissue specific gene expression is mainly driven by promoter regulatory sequences located up to about a thousand base pairs upstream the transcription start site. Moreover, this computational strategy on the study of regulatory pathways should provide, along with transcriptomics and metabolomics, data to construct cellular metabolic networks.


The metazoan genome is composed of coding sequences flanked by non-coding regions containing regulatory elements. These elements consist of short nucleotide sequences, which program gene expression at a given time and in a specific cell [1]. Despite the significant progress in genomics, which has led to the identification of most genes of the human genome, the knowledge of transcriptional regulation remains unclear. Our promoter study depends on a set of bioinformatics tools and allows the study of mechanisms of this genome regulation [2]. It relies on an analysis of gene promoter sequences which would include a combination (CRM, cis-regulatory modules) of several transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) ranging in length from ten to fifty nucleotides. TFBS are recognized by transcription factors (TFs), which allow the activation or repression of gene transcription. TFBS are difficult to differentiate from non-functional random genomic sequences [3]. These regulatory sequences and the genes that they govern define the functional spaces in the genome. Thus, such elements play a major role in the development, the environmental adaptation, the response to nutritional uptake and the pathogenesis.

The adenine nucleotide translocator (ANT), also referred to by the generic term "ADP/ATP carrier" (AAC), is a protein encoded from the nuclear genome and inserted in the inner mitochondrial membrane. ANT allows the exchange of ATP and ADP adenylic nucleotides between the mitochondrial matrix and the cytoplasm. Such a function is of primary importance because the ANT would be the main protein of the inner mitochondrial membrane able to convey this energy. The importance of this ANT protein is stressed by the fact that there exists, from yeasts to humans, four isoforms with similar amino-acid sequences (from 77 to 79% homology), with different kinetic properties, encoded from four independent genes, each with a specific expression depending on the nature of the tissue, cell type, developmental stage and status of cell proli-feration. This allows the energy production to adapt to the metabolic parameters linked to the cellular environment and cell cycle [4]. The peptide sequences of these four isoforms are very close (96% of homology); they differ only by several amino acids which are involved in the ATP and ADP interaction sites.

The specific transcriptional regulation of each of the four ANT genes is an interesting example of multi-isoform gene regulation. The metabolic and physiological consequences of these molecular regulatory mechanisms play a major role in the evolution of cellular metabolic pathways. Each of the four isoforms is known to play a specific role in cellular bioenergetics: ANT1 (SLC25A4) provides mitochondrial ATP for heart and skeletal muscle contraction [5]. The kinetic properties of this ANT1 isoform allow the rapid and massive mitochondrial ATP export required for muscular contraction. The second isoform, ANT2 (SLC25A5), is weakly or not at all expressed in human tissues and maintains the intra-mitochondrial functions under glycolytic conditions required in proliferative cells [6, 7]. ANT2 is known to have a function opposite to that of ANT1 by transporting glycolytic ATP toward the mitochondrial matrix [5]. We identified a specific regulatory sequence in the promoter region of the human ANT2 gene: the GRBOX element (Glycolysis Regulated Box) upstream of the TSS (transcription start site) [8]. ANT3 (SLC25A6) is the constitutively expressed ubiquitous isoform that is integrated into the mitochondrial membrane when no other isoform is produced [5]. In rodents, the Ant3 gene was lost during evolution. It is possible that, unlike humans, rodent physiology does not require two isoforms with different kinetics (ANT1 and ANT3). This assumption would be supported by the disappearance, in the rodents, of the OXBOX regulatory element from the ANT1 promoter [9], which would determine the muscle specific expression of this isoform. The last isoform, ANT4 (SLC25A31), was recently identified in humans, and is expressed mainly in the testicle [10]. This isoform appears in mammals and is essential during spermatogenesis [11]. Its peptide sequence is very similar (66-68% of identity) to that of the other ANT isoforms. The main characteristic of the ANT4 isoform is the presence of additional peptides, specifically the N- (13 amino acids) and C- (8 amino acids) terminal sequences, which the other three isoforms lack. The proposed hypothesis for the role of this isoform is that it compensates for the loss of the ANT2 gene function (encoded by the X chromosome) during male meiosis [11]. A recent computational analysis enabled us to propose a specific role for the ANT4 isoform in spermatozoid bioenergetics [2].

We pursued and developed this computational analysis to compare the mechanisms of transcriptional regulation of the four ANT isoforms through analysis of nucleotide sequences upstream of the supposed TSS. The nucleotide sequences of these promoter regions from several mammalian species were compared to follow the phylogeny of specific sequences of transcriptional regulation. Promoter sequences preserved throughout evolution might be of major importance to the survival of the organism [12]. This study is based on a combination of software and databases including those available on-line, such as Genomatix [13] and EnsEMBL [14], GeneProm from our laboratory. This analysis led to interesting conclusions linking promoter structure and co-regulation of a set of genes.


An outline of the bioinformatics pipeline implemented for ANT sequences analysis is illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1
figure 1

Steps of the bioinformatics study. 1.1 - Phylogenetic alignment of ANT genes in various mammalian species to filter unusable sequences and identification of matrices shared by aligned mammalian sequences from each ANT isoform gene (via Genomatix FrameWorker tool); 1.2 identification of TFBS in each human ANT isoform gene (MatInspector tool); 2 - Construction of regulation models by combining the selected matrices TFBS, IUPAC strings from bibliography; 3 - location of models in the whole human genome (3.1), in the ElDorado promoter database (3.2), and search for genes with models conserved in orthologous promoters (3.3); 4 - Identification of potentially co-regulated genes by GeneProm analysis.

Alignment and selection of ANT promoter sequences from various mammalian species

Mammalian species were screened for the homologous ANT gene sequences. Thirty mammalian species were screened for the four ANT genes and all ANT sequences (1500 nt upstream of the gene sequence and the first 500 nt of the gene including exon 1) were imported. The selected species corresponded to the 29 available mammalian sequences when the sequences were searched on EnsEMBL [14]. The mammalian sequences from each ANT gene were aligned using the CLUSTAL software and several sequences were selected according to the correct overlap of their 5’ upstream first exon sequences. Mammalian sequences with gaps, incomplete sequences or with more than 10% unknown nucleotides were discarded. Eight sequences (including Human) were obtained for the ANT1 gene, 10 for the ANT2 gene, 4 for the ANT3 gene and 7 for the ANT4 gene. The evolutionary history was inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method [15] with the bootstrap test [16] and with the Maximum Composite Likelihood method for evolutionary distances [17] (Figure 2; Additional file 1). Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA5 [18].

Figure 2
figure 2

Evolutionary relationships of taxa. The evolutionary history was inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method [15]. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (100 replicates) is shown next to the branches [16]. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary distances (number of base substitutions per site) were computed using the Maximum Composite Likelihood method [17]. The analysis involved 29 nucleotide sequences. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated.

Identification of transcriptional matrices shared by the ANT1 to 4 gene sequences

Using the FrameWorker tool from Genomatix, we found several matrices shared by the selected mammalian promoter sequences of each ANT gene. Human models were constructed (Table 1) using different sets of parameters (number of matrices and nucleotide string copies, distance between matrices and nucleotide strings and stringency of each sequence). An example of model is shown in the promoter sequence of each isoform (Figure 3). The distance between the matrices and nucleotide strings was set to twice the distance given for the corresponding human ANT promoter by default.

Table 1 Examples of ANT gene models in mammals
Figure 3
figure 3

Examples of human models constructed from the 4 ANT genes sequences. Part of the promoter sequences and the beginning of the first exon (in bold and underlined) are shown for each isoform. Matrix core sequences, nucleotide strings and TSS are highlighted in black and matrix flanking sequences in grey. A NT1 model: GGCTCTAAA (OXBOX) / GATAA (V$GATA1.04) / CAAT / TATAA (O$VTATA.01) / G (TSS) /ATG; ANT2 model: CATTGTT (GRBOX) / TCCCC (V$MZF1.01) / GGGC (EGR1.02) / TATAA (O$VTATA.01) / G (TSS) / ATG; ANT3 model: GAGGG (V$CTCF) / CACGGG (V$CHRE) / ACCTA (V$RORA) / C (TSS); ANT4 model: GTCTGG (V$SMAD3.01) / GGGGA ( V$MZF1.02) / CCCCTC (V$MAZ.01) / CACGTG (V$HIFF) / G (TSS)/ ATG.

Most matrices and IUPAC strings from the ANT1 models are directly or indirectly involved in muscle cell growth and differentiation. Most of those from the ANT2 models found were involved in cell growth and proliferation ( Additional file 2). Based on phylogenetic analysis, transcriptional factors involved in ANT3 gene regulation appear to serve different major functions. However, contrary to the three other ANT genes (1, 2 and 4), the stringency of the ANT3 models required to identify co-regulated genes was too low to lead to conclusive results (i.e., the “Screening of co-regulated genes” part). Lastly, most matrices and IUPAC strings from the ANT4 models are involved in testis development, spermatogenesis or the glycolytic energetic metabolism.

Screening of genes co-regulated with each ANT

Constructed models of each ANT gene promoter were screened as described in Figure 1, either on the whole chromosome human sequences or the human promoter database (results with an asterisk) using Genomatix ModelInspector and GeneProm. Only genes with a model located next to their transcription start sites were selected (less than 500 bp of the 3’end of the model). A match for all matrices and IUPAC strings and in the same order is required. Moreover, several locations (one-third of the results) in clones without identified genes were not retained. Encoded protein data were obtained from the EnsEMBL database [14] and data on protein function were obtained from UniProt. [19] (UniProt ID: Q9H0H5).

Results with ANT1 models (Table 2 and Additional files 3 and 4): twelve genes revealed from screening with the ANT1 promoter models (ModelInspector / GeneProm analyses) were identified. All genes are specifically expressed in muscle or directly involved in bioenergetic metabolism. Seven of these genes were found to be overexpressed in microarrays data.

Table 2 Genes co-regulated with ANT1

Results with ANT2 models (Table 3 and Additional files 3 and 4): seventeen genes were identified by ModelInspector / GeneProm analyses. Ten of them are expressed in conditions directly related to cell proliferation and glycolytic metabolism and five have a proposed function which appears to not be directly linked to one another. Twelve genes were found to be overexpressed in microarrays data (over the fifteen with a correct probe set on Affymetrix chips).

Table 3 Genes co-regulated with ANT2

Results with ANT3 models (Additional files 4 and 5): no candidate genes were identified with regular stringency (set as the same level of that used for the three other ANT sequences). A lower stringency led to identify 10 genes with the ModelInspector and GeneProm analyses. Five have unknown function and the remaining 5 have heterogeneous functions not linked to bioenergetic pathways. The sole gene found overexpressed in testes microarrays, IFT88, encodes for an intraflagellar transport protein involved in cilium biogenesis. This gene appears as a false positive result.

Results with ANT4 models (Table 4 and Additional files 3 and 4): 21 genes were identified by ModelInspector/GeneProm analyses. Four of these genes have an unknown or a supposed function; 17 are specifically expressed in the testis, during spermatogenesis, or involved in prostate metabolism. Thirteen genes were found to be overexpressed in microarrays data (over the twenty with a correct probe set on Affymetrix chips).

Table 4 Genes co-regulated with ANT4

If numerical expression results were compared for the 4 ANT isoform genes (scatter plots in Additional file 4), the expression levels were similar in glioblastoma versus control tissue for the ubiquitous ANT3 isoform gene and the identified co-regulated genes. In the opposite, the regulated ANT1, 2 and 3 genes were over-expressed in the corresponding tissues (muscle for ANT1, glioblastoma for ANT2 and testis for ANT4)


We built a pipeline of bioinformatics analyses for the study of the transcriptional regulation of a set of genes and the prediction of co-regulated genes. Co-regulated genes could encode proteins involved in the same metabolic network including an entire set of different pathways. This analysis was designed for, in the longer term, predicting a precise signature of a cellular metabolic change, which is the consequence of physiological conditions, disease, or a response to a specific pharmacological or nutritional treatment. This pipeline can analyse the structure of the promoter region of a gene and the construction of regulatory models composed of a combination of several small nucleotide sequences specifically linked to the gene function. The strategy of the promotology analysis that we adopted relies on the crossing of three complementary analyses: 1 – screening of genes located next to the constructed models on the whole human genome: combination of the Genomatix ModelInspector tools and GeneProm software) [2]; 2 – screening of these models on a database of human promoter sequences by ModelInspector / Human Promoters; 3 - screening of selected models in several mammalian species using the “Search for phylogenetically conserved promoter models” tool). The crossing of these three analyses allowed us to identify, with higher stringency, a limited set of genes controlled by the same model of promoter sequence.

This bioinformatics protocol was tested on a set of genes encoding four isoforms of the ANT protein (adenine nucleotide translocator), each having a specific role in a specific cellular type. Three of these four proteins (ANT1, ANT2 and ANT4) are controlled at the transcriptional level by a specific mechanism. The fourth (ANT3) is the ubiquitous isoform constitutively expressed in all cells. The implementation of our promotology analysis on this set of four ANT genes accounted for a powerful validation of our strategy:

ANT1: the gene encoding the isoform specifically expressed in muscle tissues [5] enabled us to build five models of the promoter sequence (Additional file 2). These models are found in the promoters of 12 genes highly expressed in muscle tissues and / or involved in bioenergetic metabolism and having a direct connection with muscle cell metabolism or mitochondrial ATP synthesis (Table 2). In particular, 6 of these genes encode proteins that are included to 3 of the mitochondrial complexes of oxidative phosphorylation: NADH dehydrogenase (complex I), cytochrome oxidase (complex IV) and ATP synthase (complex V) [20] (Figure 4). Moreover, another gene carrying a model, COQ7, is involved in the synthesis of these complexes [21]. Other identified genes encode proteins involved in major pathways of muscle metabolism such as ANO1/TMEM16A in calcium transport [22] and MYO1F in muscle contraction [23].

Figure 4
figure 4

Schematic representation of the role of ANT1 isoform in muscle cell oxidative phosphorylation. ADP3- and inorganic phosphate (Pi) are transported across the mitochondrial inner membrane (MIM) into the mitochondrial matrix by the mitochondrial ANT and phosphate carrier (PiC), respectively. F1F0-ATPase combines Pi and ADP to form ATP, which is then exchanged for ADP across the MIM by ANT1 then across MOM (mitochondrial outer membrane). The whole reaction is driven by a proton gradient maintained mainly by the respiratory chain. Six of the genes identified from our promotology analysis encode proteins included in the oxidative phosphorylation (respiratory chain and F0-F1 ATP synthase proteins).

ANT2: Most of the 17 genes carrying a model resulting from the ANT2 gene encode proteins that play a role in pathways related to cell division and proliferation (AURKC, BTG1, FGL1, GDF15, NPPC) (Table 3). Several other identified genes encode signalling proteins such as CDKNÀIP, GADD45B or HIF1-alpha. The HIF1-alpha-protein is known to induce the transcription of the HKII gene under conditions of glycolytic metabolism [24, 25]. Similar to ANT2, HKII is involved in the uptake of glycolytic ATP through the inner mitochondrial membrane. This HKII / ANT2 indirect co-regulation is consistent with their complementary roles in glycolytic conditions (Figure 5) [4, 7, 8].

Figure 5
figure 5

Schematic representation of the proposed indirect HKII / ANT2 co-regulation in glycolytic conditions. In glycolytic conditions, the mitochondrial hexokinase isoform, HK II, generates ATP from cytoplasmic glucose 6-P (G-6P). The ATP4− is then imported into mitochondria by the ANT2 isoform, contributing to the maintenance of the mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm). The HKII gene transcription is induced by the HIF1-alpha protein. CBP/p300, CREB-binding protein; ARNT, aryl hydrocarbon nuclear translocator; HRE, hypoxia response element.

ANT3: No gene carrying models built from the ANT3 gene promoter could be identified if stringency parameters similar to that used for three other isoforms were selected. Analyses with lower stringencies (lower number of matrices in models and lower similarity of matrices or IUPAC strings compared with the three other ANT genes) reveal up to 10 genes. Five of these genes encode proteins with an unknown function; the five others have no apparent functional link among one another (Additional file 5). Moreover, the analysis of the ANT3 promoter region by the Genomatix MatInspector and PromoterInspector tools proposed few regulation matrices as compared to genes of the three other regulated isoforms (result not shown). In low stringency conditions, the sequence of the model becomes not significant: for a model with 5 matrices, the 4 to 6 nucleotides of the core sequences are conserved with an identity of 100%. Thus, such models could often lead to the identification of unrelated false positive genes. Moreover, this study confirms that our model construction from conserved models in different mammalian species could clearly identify the not specifically regulated ubiquitous genes.

ANT4: The models constructed from the ANT4 gene promoter allowed us to identify 15 genes with known function in spermatogenesis (Table 4). Our previous work on the promoter of this ANT4 gene led us to identify a part of these co-regulated genes [2]. The new version of our GeneProm software enabled us to identify 5 new genes also directly related to spermatogenesis. Among these 5 genes specifically expressed in the testes, two encode the glucose-6-phosphatases 2 and 3 enzymes, producing glucose from glucose-6-phosphate, leading to ATP synthesis [26]. This function is in complete agreement with the exclusively glycolytic metabolism of spermatozoids [11]. Moreover, this glycolytic ATP production is also consistent with the expression and the specific role of the ANT4 isoform in spermatozoid bioenergetics: part of the ATP produced by glucose-6-phosphatases 2 and 3 could be imported into mitochondria by ANT4 (gene located on chromosome 4) to compensate for the absence of the ANT2 isoform (gene located on chromosome X and not transcribed during spermatogenesis) (Figure 6) [2].

Figure 6
figure 6

Schematic representation of the role of ANT4 isoform in bioenergetics during spermatogenesis. The glucose-6-phosphatases 2 and 3 (G6PC) generates ATP from glucose 6-P (G-6P) produced by the cytoplasmic hexokinase, HK. The ATP4− is imported into mitochondria across the MOM (mitochondrial outer membrane) through the voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC), and then across the MIM (the mitochondrial inner membrane) by the ANT4 isoform. ATP4− contributes to the maintenance of the mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) in spermatozoid mitochondria. The hydrolysis of imported glycolytic ATP4− by the F1 component of the ATP synthase leads to 1 - the release of ADP3− in mitochondria with the gain of a negative charge on the matrix side; and 2 - the ejection of a proton into the intermembrane space through the F0 component.

Thus, this in silico analysis leads to very interesting conclusions on the relationship between transcriptional regulatory pathways and protein function in a cellular metabolic network. A set of genes encoding protein isoforms expressed with tissue specificity turned out to be a clear validation of our strategy. The phylogenetic comparison of promoters allowed for the identification of nucleotidic matrices with major roles in gene regulation. However, the exclusive use of regulatory matrices has limits; it requires multiple analyses with different parameters of stringency and layout of each matrix compared with the other involved regulatory elements. The presence, in a promoter region, of described and validated nucleotide sequences, such as the OXBOX (oxidative box) [9] and GRBOX (glycolysis regulated box) [8], known to take part to the regulation of the ANT1 and ANT2 genes, respectively, is a crucial argument in the construction of a powerful regulatory model. The presence of a gene encoding a ubiquitous isoform, ANT3, and the failure to identify co-regulated genes with models built from its promoter region allow us to validate our strategy. Moreover, this analysis of an unregulated ubiquitous gene becomes a standard for further works by providing a precise scale of similarity of matrices in our models. Thus, a strategy of promotology, based simultaneously on a conclusive phylogenetic analysis and on already validated regulatory nucleotide sequences, allows for the identification of co-regulated genes.

Our work on this set of isoforms also showed that transcriptional regulation is a major mechanism of cellular specificity. The structure of the promoter sequence directly upstream of the transcription start site itself allows the identification of co-regulated genes. This suggests that, at least for the regulation of bioenergetic pathways described in this work, other supposed regulatory mechanisms including microRNA or the messenger RNA stability, would intervene in other cellular functions. Moreover, our strategy allows overcoming the insufficiencies of other techniques used for the study of gene expression. Taking into account the very close coding sequences of the four ANT isoforms, no currently commercial microarrays able to simultaneously and specifically quantify the four transcripts is available. In addition, the very hydrophobic properties of these proteins do not allow their identification by 2D electrophoresis and no specific antibody of each isoform is available.


In conclusion, our computational strategy on a set of four isoforms, known for their specific functions in cell bioenergetics, enabled us to develop a powerful analysis of gene promoter sequences. Our analyses enabled us to identify an entire set of co-regulated genes, involved in the same cellular function. This study validates the major role of the proximal promoter region in tissue specificity and should provide, along with transcriptomics and metabolomics, assistance in developing cellular metabolic networks and the study of their regulatory pathways.


Process of bioinformatics study

Our study was performed in four steps (Figure 1): 1 - We began with a short phylogenetic study of the four ANT genes from various mammalian species. This step enabled us to check database annotations and eliminate sequences that were impossible to align to the four human ANT genes. The application of the Genomatix tool FrameWorker to the selected mammalian sequences provided a list of regulatory elements (matrices) or matrix families identified among the aligned sequences and conserved in orthologous promoters. The Genomatix MatInspector tool proposes a set of matrices along the promoter sequence of each human ANT gene. 2 - We organized matrices, already known TFBS and canonical sequences (CAAT, TATAA, ATG) into regulatory models by the Genomatix FastM tool. 3 - Models were then screened with the Genomatix ModelInspector tool across the entire human genome (GenBank clones [27]) and in the human promoter database Genomatix Eldorado. Models with positive results were screened in 12 mammalian promoter databases by the Genomatix “Search for phylogenetically conserved models” tool. 4 - Genes were identified from their position in GenBank clones using the GeneProm software we deve-loped [2] and allowing to identify all human genes (known and supposed) with a model located upstream. The GeneProm software consists of a web application accessible on SourceForge and is distributed under MIT license. It was developed in Ruby by using the Rails framework and in Perl by using the Bioperl and EnsEMBL libraries.

Phylogenetic study of the ANT genes in mammals

Nucleotide sequences of the four ANT genes were screened in 29 mammalian species including humans. Sequences were imported from the EnsEMBL database [14]. These sequences included the first 500 bases of the gene, including exon 1, and an additional 1500-nt sequence upstream of the TSS. Manual sorting of these sequences was performed by withdrawing the sequences containing either a high number of undefined bases (more than 10% within the promoter region) or annotation errors at the transcription initiation sites (identified by alignment of the sequences, including the first exon for each species). A phylogeny reconstruction of the retained coding sequences was performed to validate the functional annotations of these genes. The alignment algorithm used was CLUSTAL 2.0, using the default settings. The phylogeny was rebuilt using two different methods: the neighbour-joining method with minimum evolution and UPGMA (Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic mean) both with bootstrap evaluation. Both techniques provided concordant results. This phylogeny was carried out to verify the annotations of the sequences in the databases and the promoter sequences to be compared.

After considering the phylogenetic results of our study, we decided to analyze only a small number (29) of mammalian sequences that did not contain undetermined bases in their promoter regions and did not significantly diverge from the human sequence (Figure 2 and Additional file 1). Additionally, the transcription initiation sites of all the retained sequences were compatible with the known human initiation site. The alignment of the 5' sequences (1500 nt upstream of the ATG site) was performed using the CLUSTAL 2.0 software. Similar alignments have been obtained using MUSCLE. The sequences of the four ANT genes (ANT1 to 4 aliases SLC25A4, SLC25A5, SLC25A6, SLC25A31, respectively) were aligned to verify their annotation in the EnsEMBL database [14]. Thus, the list of 15 selected species takes into account the sequencing quality of this genomic region.

Identification of transcriptional matrices

The FrameWorker tool of the Genomatix software package was used for this part of the analysis. This tool identified transcriptional regulatory sequences from the bibliography, called regulatory matrices, which were shared by a set of gene promoter sequences. Matrices were identified from the Genomatix database produced by the alignment of all regulatory elements identified to date in all vertebrates. The database includes 727 vertebrate matrices classified into 170 families (noted V$) and 16 additional general matrices from higher organisms, classified into ten families (noted O$). Additionally, the FrameWorker tool enables identification of the regulatory models shared by different promoter sequences. The MatInspector tool simultaneously allows the identification of the regulatory matrices within a promoter sequence and the analysis of different parameters.

Construction of regulatory models and screening

The nucleotide distances between the different identified matrices of the most relevant models were then bound between minimal and maximal values. Previously identified and potentially interesting nucleotide sequences in the promoter area of interest were then combined with the set of selected matrices. The resulting new model, which generally included 4 to 6 matrices or nucleotide strings (Table 1), could be searched using the selected stringencies in three databases of mammalian genomes.

1- The whole human genome (GenBank Release 184) using the Genomatix ModelInspector tool [28]. A list of clones (contigs) containing the studied model was obtained in this analysis with the exact positions of the identified models and their orientation in each clone; 2 - The Genomatix Eldorado 08–2011 database of human promoter sequences including a set of approximately 120.000 promoter sequences associated with transcripts; 3 - The Genomatix Eldorado 08–2011 database of a set of mammalian promoter sequences. The “Search for phylogenetically conserved promoter models” tool allows a search for models that are conserved in orthologous promoter sequences of several mammalian species, which provides evidence for the functionality of promoter models through their preservation during evolution.

The different stringency parameters of this study (ModelInspector parameters) were as follows: maximum number of mismatches allowed for either matrix or nucleotide string; threshold (number of matrices or strings present in the sequence vs. the number of matrices or strings to find); research of individual or matrix families; global and core matrix similarities; matrix sense in relation to the clone; and minimal and maximal distances between two matrices or nucleotide strings.

Identification and selection of genes

The list of GenBank clones proposed by ModelInspector was exported into our GeneProm software. GeneProm allowed us to find the model chromosomal location and to identify known, supposed or unknown genes present in the immediate proximity (or in partial overlap) of the considered model (Figure 7). The filters used in this analysis were: 1 - the respective orientations of the model, the EMBL contig, the chromosomal DNA strand and the identified gene; 2 – the maximal distance from the 3’ end of the model to the TSS of the gene (500 nt by default); 3 - the maximal length of the overlapped sequence between the model and the 5’ end sequence of the identified gene (200 nt by default). These filters permitted the selection of genes directly downstream of the researched model from the same strand of DNA with the same orientation.

Figure 7
figure 7

GeneProm filters for the respective orientations of the model, the identified gene, the EMBL contig and the chromosomal DNA strand. 2000 nt was the maximal distance between the 5’ end of the model and the TSS of a gene. A (model + / clone + / chromosome +): a’ = x + a and z = x + a + 2000; B (−/+/−): a’ = x + a and z = x + a – 2000; C (− /- / +): a’ = y - a and z = y – a + 2000; D (+/−/-): a’ = y - a and z = y – a – 2000.

The list of the genes obtained from the two analyses (ModelInspector on GenBank and on Eldorado database) was manually analysed, and an exhaustive bibliography was obtained for each gene (HGNC database [29]) to identify the function of each corresponding protein and their direct or indirect links with the ANT protein. The GeneProm software was then paired using a script to the KEGG database [30], allowing the identification of the metabolic networks involved in the protein encoded from each gene identified from the previous step. A complementary bibliographic analysis was performed to relate the identified proteins to suggested metabolic pathways. Key proteins involved in these pathways could be identified.

Gene expression from Affymetrix Human Genechips

Gene expression data were downloaded from the GEO database [31]. Data from glioblastoma tissues, normal skin, normal muscle, normal testis and normal brain tissues came from the series GSE15824, GSE7307 and GSE14905 and were all measured by hybridization with Affymetrix Human Genechips U133 plus 2.0. Data from all the different samples were normalized by quantile method with “Affy package on bioconductor”. The ability of all the probe sets of the Affymetrix Genechips to hybridize to their target mRNAs was ascertain using the ADAPT database [32]. Values reported for all the individual tissues correspond to the averaged values of the expression levels of the probe set in all the samples of a given tissue. Each probe set underwent statistical analysis using the Wilcoxon Test.



adenine nucleotide translocator


cis-regulatory modules




transcription factor binding sites


transcription factors


transcription start site.


  1. Chopra VS: Chromosomal organization at the level of gene complexes. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011, 68 (6): 977-990. 10.1007/s00018-010-0585-2.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dupont PY, Stepien G: Computational analysis of the transcriptional regulation of the adenine nucleotide translocator isoform 4 gene and its role in spermatozoid glycolytic metabolism. Gene. 2011, 487 (1): 38-45. 10.1016/j.gene.2011.07.024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gaffney DJ, Blekhman R, Majewski J: Selective constraints in experimentally defined primate regulatory regions. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4 (8): e1000157-10.1371/journal.pgen.1000157.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chevrollier A, Loiseau D, Reynier P, Stepien G: Adenine nucleotide translocase 2 is a key mitochondrial protein in cancer metabolism. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010, 1807 (6): 562-567.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stepien G, Torroni A, Chung AB, Hodge JA, Wallace DC: Differential expression of adenine nucleotide translocator isoforms in mammalian tissues and during muscle cell differentiation. J Biol Chem. 1992, 267 (21): 14592-14597.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barath P, Luciakova K, Hodny Z, Li R, Nelson BD: The growth-dependent expression of the adenine nucleotide translocase-2 (ANT2) gene is regulated at the level of transcription and is a marker of cell proliferation. Exp Cell Res. 1999, 248 (2): 583-588. 10.1006/excr.1999.4432.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chevrollier A, Loiseau D, Chabi B, Renier G, Douay O, Malthiery Y, Stepien G: ANT2 isoform required for cancer cell glycolysis. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2005, 37 (5): 307-316. 10.1007/s10863-005-8642-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Giraud S, Bonod-Bidaud C, Wesolowski-Louvel M, Stepien G: Expression of human ANT2 gene in highly proliferative cells: GRBOX, a new transcriptional element, is involved in the regulation of glycolytic ATP import into mitochondria. J Mol Biol. 1998, 281 (3): 409-418. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1955.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Li K, Hodge JA, Wallace DC: OXBOX, a positive transcriptional element of the heart-skeletal muscle ADP/ATP translocator gene. J Biol Chem. 1990, 265 (33): 20585-20588.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dolce V, Scarcia P, Iacopetta D, Palmieri F: A fourth ADP/ATP carrier isoform in man: identification, bacterial expression, functional characterization and tissue distribution. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579 (3): 633-637. 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.12.034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brower JV, Rodic N, Seki T, Jorgensen M, Fliess N, Yachnis AT, McCarrey JR, Oh SP, Terada N: Evolutionarily conserved mammalian adenine nucleotide translocase 4 is essential for spermatogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282 (40): 29658-29666. 10.1074/jbc.M704386200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tanay A, Gat-Viks I, Shamir R: A global view of the selection forces in the evolution of yeast cis-regulation. Genome Res. 2004, 14 (5): 829-834. 10.1101/gr.2064404.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Genomatix: Genomatix Personalized Medicine - Relevance for scientists. 2011,,

    Google Scholar 

  14. EnsEMBL: Ensembl genome Browser EBI. 2011,,

    Google Scholar 

  15. Saitou N, Nei M: The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987, 4 (4): 406-425.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zharkikh A, Li WH: Estimation of confidence in phylogeny: the complete-and-partial bootstrap technique. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1995, 4 (1): 44-63. 10.1006/mpev.1995.1005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lindsay BG: Composite Likelihood method. Contemp Math. 1988, 80: 221-239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tamura K, Nei M, Kumar S: Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004, 101 (30): 11030-11035. 10.1073/pnas.0404206101.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Uniprot: Universal Protein Resource Knowledgebase.,

  20. Lenaz G, Genova ML: Structural and functional organization of the mitochondrial respiratory chain: a dynamic super-assembly. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2009, 41 (10): 1750-1772. 10.1016/j.biocel.2009.04.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Levavasseur F, Miyadera H, Sirois J, Tremblay ML, Kita K, Shoubridge E, Hekimi S: Ubiquinone is necessary for mouse embryonic development but is not essential for mitochondrial respiration. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276 (49): 46160-46164. 10.1074/jbc.M108980200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Davis AJ, Forrest AS, Jepps TA, Valencik ML, Wiwchar M, Singer CA, Sones WR, Greenwood IA, Leblanc N: Expression profile and protein translation of TMEM16A in murine smooth muscle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2010, 299 (5): C948-C959. 10.1152/ajpcell.00018.2010.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rual JF, Venkatesan K, Hao T, Hirozane-Kishikawa T, Dricot A, Li N, Berriz GF, Gibbons FD, Dreze M, Ayivi-Guedehoussou N, et al, et al: Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nature. 2005, 437 (7062): 1173-1178. 10.1038/nature04209.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mathupala SP, Rempel A, Pedersen PL: Glucose catabolism in cancer cells: identification and characterization of a marked activation response of the type II hexokinase gene to hypoxic conditions. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276 (46): 43407-43412. 10.1074/jbc.M108181200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pedersen PL, Mathupala S, Rempel A, Geschwind JF, Ko YH: Mitochondrial bound type II hexokinase: a key player in the growth and survival of many cancers and an ideal prospect for therapeutic intervention. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002, 1555 (1–3): 14-20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Burchell A, Watkins SL, Hume R: Human fetal testis endoplasmic reticulum glucose-6-phosphatase enzyme protein. Biol Reprod. 1996, 55 (2): 298-303. 10.1095/biolreprod55.2.298.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. GenBank: Genetic sequence database at the National Center for Biotechnical Information (NCBI) (GenBank ID: BA123456).,

  28. Frech K, Danescu-Mayer J, Werner T: A novel method to develop highly specific models for regulatory units detects a new LTR in GenBank which contains a functional promoter. J Mol Biol. 1997, 270 (5): 674-687. 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1140.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. HGNC: Human Genome Organisation Gene Nomenclature Committee.,

  30. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes Kanehisa Laboratories.,

  31. GEO: Gene Expression Omnibus.,

  32. Leong HS, Yates T, Wilson C, Miller CJ: ADAPT: a database of affymetrix probesets and transcripts. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21 (10): 2552-2553. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti359.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Quandt K, Frech K, Karas H, Wingender E, Werner T: MatInd and MatInspector: new fast and versatile tools for detection of consensus matches in nucleotide sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995, 23 (23): 4878-4884. 10.1093/nar/23.23.4878.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the Cancéropôle Lyon Auvergne Rhône-Alpes (CLARA), “Nutrition Métabolisme et Cancer” ProCan axis, to G. S; the Conseil Régional Auvergne to GS (LifeGrid funds) and P.-Y. D (“Innovation Région” funds) and FEDER (Fonds Européen de Développement Régional) to P.-Y. D. Thanks are due to the Soluscience company for helpful expert assistance in informatics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georges Stepien.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

P-YD carried out the GeneProm software construction, the phylogenetic analysis and helped to draft the manuscript. AG carried out the analysis of the Affymetrix Human Genechips and the scatter plots of the expression levels, J-PI participated to the design of the study and to the Genechips selection, GS conceived the study, carried out the computational study, followed its design and coordination, and drafted the manuscript. All authors read, corrected and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material


Additional file 1: ANT gene sequences in mammals. Mammalian ANT gene sequences selected for the 4 ANT isoforms in 24 mammals. Sequences were extracted from EnsEMBL database. Sequences in bold are sequences that do not contain undetermined bases in their promoter and are not too divergent from the corresponding human sequence. (DOCX 31 KB)


Additional file 2: ANT gene models in mammals. Matrix families (i.e. V$MEF2), matrices (i.e. V$NRF2.01) and IUPAC strings from the four human ANTs gene promoters. For matrix families, an example of IUPAC string is shown. For matrices, only nucleotides (IUPAC) with high information content are presented (the matrix exhibits a high conservation at this position). For matrices, nucleotides in bold capital letters denote the core sequence used by MatInspector (defined as the highest, usually four, conserved consecutive positions) [33]. The other nucleotides are from the flanking sequence. Motifs with an asterisk were identified from phylogenetic analyses. IUPAC nucleotide code: R (A or G); Y (C or T); S (G or C); W (A or T); K (G or T); M (A or C); B (C or G or T); D (A or G or T); H (A or C or T); V (A or C or G); N (any base). (DOCX 72 KB)


Additional file 3: Scatter plots of the expression levels of genes with identical promoter models with the ANT promoters in different tissues. ANT1: average expression levels of the genes from Table 2 in the lung, skin and brain tissues versus their expression in muscle. ANT2: average expression levels of the genes from Table 3 in normal brain tissue versus their expression in glioblastoma. ANT3: average expression levels of the genes from Additional file 5 in normal brain tissue versus their expression in glioblastoma. ANT4: average expression levels of the genes from Table 4 in the lung, skin and brain tissues versus their expression in testis. Red diamonds correspond to over-expressed genes with at least a 1.5 fold changes between tissues. (DOCX 47 KB)


Additional file 4: Genes co-regulated with the ANT3 gene. The full set of results obtained from the analysis with all constructed models of the ANT3 promoter regions were screened as described in Figure 1 either on the whole chromosome human sequences or the human promoter library (results with an asterisk). The gene in bold is shown overexpressed in microarrays. Gene IDs are with 15 numbers (ex. ENSG00000023228). (DOCX 60 KB)


Additional file 5: Expression levels of genes that share promoter models with ANT genes in different tissues. Expression levels of genes that share promoter models with ANT promoters in different tissues. Data were obtained from hybridization experiments using Affymetrix genechips as described in material and methods. Y scale in log2 of the average values of the ratios. An average value of the ratios was also calculated for each gene whose expression was assessed by several probe sets. (DOCX 34 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dupont, PY., Guttin, A., Issartel, JP. et al. Computational identification of transcriptionally co-regulated genes, validation with the four ANT isoform genes. BMC Genomics 13, 482 (2012).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: