Skip to main content

Computer aided identification of a Hevein-like antimicrobial peptide of bell pepper leaves for biotechnological use



Antimicrobial peptides from plants present mechanisms of action that are different from those of conventional defense agents. They are under-explored but have a potential as commercial antimicrobials. Bell pepper leaves (‘Magali R’) are discarded after harvesting the fruit and are sources of bioactive peptides. This work reports the isolation by peptidomics tools, and the identification and partially characterization by computational tools of an antimicrobial peptide from bell pepper leaves, and evidences the usefulness of records and the in silico analysis for the study of plant peptides aiming biotechnological uses.


Aqueous extracts from leaves were enriched in peptide by salt fractionation and ultrafiltration. An antimicrobial peptide was isolated by tandem chromatographic procedures. Mass spectrometry, automated peptide sequencing and bioinformatics tools were used alternately for identification and partial characterization of the Hevein-like peptide, named HEV-CANN. The computational tools that assisted to the identification of the peptide included BlastP, PSI-Blast, ClustalOmega, PeptideCutter, and ProtParam; conventional protein databases (DB) as Mascot, Protein-DB, GenBank-DB, RefSeq, Swiss-Prot, and UniProtKB; specific for peptides DB as Amper, APD2, CAMP, LAMPs, and PhytAMP; other tools included in ExPASy for Proteomics; The Bioactive Peptide Databases, and The Pepper Genome Database. The HEV-CANN sequence presented 40 amino acid residues, 4258.8 Da, theoretical pI-value of 8.78, and four disulfide bonds. It was stable, and it has inhibited the growth of phytopathogenic bacteria and a fungus. HEV-CANN presented a chitin-binding domain in their sequence. There was a high identity and a positive alignment of HEV-CANN sequence in various databases, but there was not a complete identity, suggesting that HEV-CANN may be produced by ribosomal synthesis, which is in accordance with its constitutive nature.


Computational tools for proteomics and databases are not adjusted for short sequences, which hampered HEV-CANN identification. The adjustment of statistical tests in large databases for proteins is an alternative to promote the significant identification of peptides. The development of specific DB for plant antimicrobial peptides, with information about peptide sequences, functional genomic data, structural motifs and domains of molecules, functional domains, and peptide-biomolecule interactions are valuable and necessary.


In agriculture, alternative control of pests and diseases is strategic in attention to food security and environmental preservation [1]. The emergence of resistant microorganisms to conventional plant protection encourages the search for agents with antimicrobial action modes that are under-exploited [2], such as antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). Plant AMPs are ubiquitous in nature, present a broad spectrum and fast action against microorganisms and low cytotoxicity to animals. They have a potential antimicrobial effect that does not harm the environment [3]. Plant AMPs can act against fungi, bacteria and enveloped viruses, inhibit hydrolases from insects [4, 5] and act as anti-viral, anti-tumor, anti-inflammatory, healing and immunomodulators [6].

Most plant peptides are linear, smaller than 10 kDa, rich in cysteine, cationic and partially hydrophobic [4, 7]. The main families even now characterized are Defensins [810], Thionins [11], Lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) [12], Cyclotides [13], Hevein-like peptides [14], Knottin-like peptides [15], MBP-1 [16], Snakins [13], Shepherdins [17], 2S Albumin-like peptides [13], Ib-AMP1 [18], and Small proteinase inhibitors [11]. Some works show in detail the structures, functions and uses of plant AMPs [8, 15, 1921]. Defensins, Thionins, LTPs and Hevein-like peptides are being widely investigated.

Hevein-like peptides have recently attracted interest of scientists, with a large number of reports in the last five years, such as the identification of Hevein-like domains containing 10 Cys in wheat [22]; the differential Cys-distribution in Hevein-like in Taraxacum officinale [23]; the study of genes encoding Hevein-like in wheat [24]; the inhibition of fungal metalloproteinase by Hevein-like from wheat [25]; in silico studies to identify novel precursors of Hevein-like [26]; and studies of networks of interaction involving plant AMPs, not only Hevein-like [27].

Hevein-like peptides are described as promising for biotechnological applications [13, 19, 28], including in agribusiness and for animal therapy [29]. Odintsova et al. [30] reported the action of Hevein-like peptides of Pharbitis nill in controlling the growth of eight pathogenic fungi in low concentrations (IC50 from 0.1 to 3.7 μM). Heterologous expression of Hevein-like peptides successfully increased the resistance of the transformed organisms to fungi, such as Escherichia coli [31], tomato plants [32], tobacco and arabidopsis plants [33]. Plants can be enriched in Hevein-like peptides for the extraction of natural pesticides [34] or to produce genotypes that are resistant to pathogens. The alternative control of pests and diseases in agriculture is strategic for food security and environmental preservation [1].

The study of AMPs is however hampered by its small size. Proteomics tools applied to peptides [35] are able to successfully isolate AMPs, despite the low concentrations of the peptides in the tissues. However, computational tools need to be adjusted to allow significant identification of the peptides by the alignment of short peptide sequences (up to 9 kDa). Low E-values for sequence alignments are desirable, since E-value depends inversely on the length of the query sequence and directly on the length of the database [36]. These tools are valuable to prospect and characterize plant AMPs for academic and/or biotechnological purposes.

Species of Capsicum sp. genus are widely reported as AMPs producers. In agribusiness, bell pepper (Capsicum annuum) plants are regarded as waste after fruits harvesting. However they produce compounds that have not yet been exploited and are biotechnologically interesting. This work reports the isolation using peptidomics tools, and the identification and partially characterization using computational tools of an antimicrobial peptide from bell pepper (‘Magali R’) leaves, and evidenced the usefulness of records and the in silico analysis for the study of plant AMPs aiming a future application in biotechnological research.


Materials and reagents

Materials and reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri, USA), GE Healthcare (GE Corporate, Wisconsin, USA), Bio-Rad (Hercules, California, USA), Merck (Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA), and other companies offering high quality products. For chromatography and mass spectrometry, materials were of spectrometric grade. Specific reagents are mentioned ahead.

Plant material and microorganisms

Bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L. ‘Magali R’) plants (n = 120) were cultivated in June-July 2011, in a greenhouse at Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV), Brazil (20°45′ S, 42°52′ W, 690 m a.s.l.). Cultivation were in a greenhouse under natural light at > 85% relative humidity, from 20 °C to 38 °C with an 11 h photoperiod at 1.0 m above the floor. All fully-expanded leaves from 60-d-old plants were harvested as peptide source and maintained at −80 °C until use. The phytopathogenic test-bacteria Clavibacter michiganensis ssp. michiganensis (Gram-positive) and Ralstonia solanacearum (Gram-negative), provided by the Department of Plant Pathology at UFV, were maintained under 30% (v/v) glycerol, and grown according to Teixeira et al. [37].

Protein extraction, ultrafiltration and quantification

Frozen leaves (150 g) were powdered and extracted with 600 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, containing the protease inhibitors 10 mM ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid, 1.0 mM phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride, 1.0 mM benzamidine, and 2.0 mM thiourea [37]. After centrifugation at 20,300 × g for 30 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was fractionated using saturated ammonium sulfate at 35 and 75%, sequentially, respectively for 2 and 16 h at 4 °C, and centrifuged as above. The precipitate was resuspended in 200 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, and the fraction was ultrafiltered using two AMICON membranes (10-kDa and 1-kDa; Millipore, Billerica, USA), producing the fraction labeled SE1-10. The soluble protein was determined by bicinchoninic acid method [38], using bovine serum albumin as standard protein. Three replicates have been made.

Peptide isolation by chromatography and electrophoresis

Chromatography experiments were carried out using a Waters System (Waters Corporation, USA). The fraction SE1-10 (500 μL) was separated by reverse-phase chromatography (RPC) in C18-column Shim-pack CLC-ODS (4.6 × 150 mm, 5.0 μm, Shimadzu, Japan) or in C4-column YMC-Pack (4.6 × 250 mm, 5.0 μm, YMC Co., Kioto, Japan). The columns were equilibrated with 0.1% (v/v) TFA (Solution A) and peptides were eluted in increasing gradient of 0.1% (v/v) TFA and 80% (v/v) acetonitrile (Solution B), at 1.0 mL.min−1. In RPC-C18, peaks were collected at 1.0 mL.min−1; in RPC-C4, 200-μL fractions were collected along 90 min at 0.5 mL.min−1. The molecular exclusion chromatography (MEC) was performed in the column Protein Pack 60 Å (7.8 × 300 mm, 5.0 μm, separation range 2–10 kDa, Waters Corporation, USA). The column was equilibrated and eluted in 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, added of 250 mM NaCl, at 0.1 mL.min−1. For all separations, chromatographic profiles were followed by absorbance at 214 nm.

SDS-Tricine-PAGE [39] was used to check the degree of peptide enrichment after ultrafiltration and RPC. Samples were boiled for 10-min in loading buffer and separated in a three-phase gel. Broad Range Molecular Weight Standards (161-0317, Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA) and Ultra-Low Range Molecular Weight Standards (M3546, SIGMA, USA) were used. Peptide bands were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 [40].

Peptide reduction, alkylation and proteolysis

Prior to mass spectrometry analyzes the peptide samples were transferred to siliconized PCR tubes (200 μL) previously washed with methanol, and reduced with 50 mM dithiothreitol in 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate, pH 8.0, for 1 h at 70 °C, in a thermomixer at 500 rpm. After this step, the peptides were alkylated with 100 mM iodoacetamide in 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate, pH 8.0, for 1 h at 28 °C, in the absence of light, in a thermomixer at 500 rpm. To determine the number of cysteine radical free or involved in disulfide bonds, the peptide sample was analyzed by mass spectrometry in three conditions: native sample, reduced/alkylated sample, and not-reduced/alkylated sample. Peptide mass-values were compared for the samples, considering that alkylation with acetamide added 57.05 Da for each alkylated sulfhydryl group [41].

For the tryptic digestion [42], Trypsin Gold V5280, mass spectrometry grade (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) was used at 0.025 μg.μL−1 solubilized in 40 mM ammonium bicarbonate, pH 8.0, and 10% (v/v) acetonitrile. The proteolysis carried out at 37 °C for 16 h. Alternatively, aiming to follow peptide degradation, proteolysis was performed by a larger period, with collecting samples at 6, 12, 24, and 36 h. Before mass spectrometry (MS) analysis, samples were concentrated in a speedvac and desalted using ZipTip C18-columns (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA).

Mass spectrometry and peptide identification

Mass spectra of the native peptide or the tryptic peptides were obtained on a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) tandem time-of-flight (TOF/TOF) mass spectrometer (MALDI-TOF/TOF) model Ultraflex III (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany), in the positive ion reflector mode. The samples were mixed with 5 μg.mL−1 α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) in a proportion of 1:3 (sample:matrix) and dispensed onto an MTP AnchorChip MTP 600/384 TF target (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). Calibration was done externally with the Peptide Standard Calibration II Mixture (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). For MS1, the methods of analysis were LPPepMix (500 to 5000 Da) and LPProtMix (3000 to 20,000 Da), and for MS2, LIFT technology (40 to 1878 Da) was performed. The spectra were processed using flexAnalysis software Version 3.0 (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany, PN246503) and peak lists (xml and mgf format) were used for identification of the proteins using the peptide mass fingerprinting (PMF) method and by peptide fragment fingerprinting (PFF), both using the Mascot software [43] for Green Plants or All entries and NCBInr [44] and Swiss-Prot [45] protein Databases. For the search, the mass tolerances for the parental ions and fragment ions were set to 50 ppm and 0.1 Da, respectively. Peptides were searched using fully tryptic cleavage constraints and up to one missed cleavage sites was allowed, fixed modification for carbamidomethylation of Cys residues and variable modification for oxidation of methionine residues. For significant identification, the criteria used for PMF were a significant Mascot score (p-value < 0.05) for at least four peptides showing matches and greater than 20% sequence coverage; and for PFF, significant Mascot alignment score (p-value < 0.05) for at least two peptides. Amino acid sequencing in MS2 spectra were confirmed by manual de novo sequencing [46].

The N-terminal amino acid residues of the peptide were identified by automated Edman degradation sequencing in a peptide sequencer (PPSQ-33 Shimadzu, Japan). The equipment was calibrated with phenylthiohydantoin-amino acids at 25 pmol, samples were reduced, alkylated, desalted by RPC-C18, concentrated, and analyzed onto a glass fiber membrane previously treated with polybrene. Samples were alternatively analyzed onto a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane. Analyses were processed with PPSQ-30 Data Processing Software.

Determination of peptide sequence

Computational tools and databases (DB) of protein and peptide sequences were used alternately to compose the initial sequence of the peptide using mass spectrometry data and sequentially to unravel the complete sequence of the peptide. Portals were the ExPASy server and the Bioactive Peptide Databases [47], and The Pepper Genome Database (release 2.0) [48]. Databases for proteins were NCBI-Protein DB [49], NCBI-GenBank DB [50], NCBI-Reference Sequence (RefSeq) DB (nr) [44], UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot DB [51], and Swiss-Prot Protein DB [45]. Databases for peptides were Antimicrobial Peptide Search - APD2 [52], Database Linking AMPs [53], AMPer [54], CAMP [55], and PhytAMP DB [56]. Softwares used for peptide characterization were ClustalOmega [57] to produce multiple sequence alignment; Pairwise Sequence Alignment [58] to align two sequences; NCBI-Protein BLAST [59] to compare primary amino acid sequence information to identify the query sequence; NCBI-PSI-BLAST [60] to refine comparison of protein sequence alignment to find evolutionary relationships; PeptideCutter [61] to predict potential cleavage sites of trypsin action and then produce a theoretical trypsinolysis, and ProtParam [61] to compute physical and chemical parameters of the peptide molecule.

Antimicrobial assays

The inhibitory activity of the peptide-enriched fraction was evaluated against the plant pathogens Ralstonia solanacearum (Gram-negative) and Clavibacter michiganensis ssp. michiganensis (Gram-positive) by using the Microplate Test at 560 nm [37]. Tests were carried out in liquid LB culture medium at 28 °C, in three biological replicates.


Isolation of a plant peptide using proteomics procedures

Fractionation of the soluble extract (SE) of leaves from bell pepper with ammonium sulfate (between 35 and 75% saturation), followed by ultrafiltration procedure (in membranes with molecular weight cut-off of 1 and 10 kDa) produced the fraction SE1-10 enriched in constitutive peptides ranging from 4 to 5 kDa. SDS-Tricine-PAGE showed peptides in the fraction SE1-10 and the absence of these peptides in the fraction containing proteins larger than 10 kDa (Fig. 1a). Reverse-phase chromatography (RPC) in C18-column (RPC-C18) evidenced the complexity of SE1-10 and isolated the peptide fraction P1-RPC-C18 (Fig. 1b and c). Mass spectrometry (MS) analysis has detected an interest mono-charged peptide with 4241 Da, and doubly charged with 2122 Da (Fig. 1d).

Fig. 1

Isolation of a peptide enriched fraction from bell pepper leaves using reverse-phase chromatography (RPC). a SDS-Tricine-PAGE of the peptide fraction SE1-10 (lanes 1, 2) and protein fraction (lanes 3, 4); b RPC-C18 profile of the fraction SE1-10, producing P1-RPC-C18 (arrow); c SDS-Tricine-PAGE of the fraction P1-RPC-C18j; d Mass spectrometry profile of the fraction P1-RPC-C18, showing the mono-charged (4241 Da) and the doubly charged (2122 Da) peptide ions. MM: Broad range molecular marker; mm: Low range molecular marker

Targeting a higher purity of these peptides, P1-RPC-C18 was fractionated by three chromatographic procedures. RPC in C4-column (RPC-C4) isolated two fractions (P2-RPC-C4A and P2-RPC-C4B), which contained the ions 4240 and 2122 Da (see Additional file 1). A RP rechromatography on C18-column produced a fraction containing the same two ions (see Additional file 2), similarly to the Fig. 1d. The molecular exclusion chromatography (MEC) produced fractions with the highest degree of purity (Fig. 2a). The ion 4240 Da was detected in fraction P4-MEC, the most purified (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2

Isolation of a peptide enriched fraction from bell pepper leaves using molecular exclusion chromatography (MEC). a MEC profile using a Protein Pack 60 Å column (7.8 × 300 mm, 5.0 μm, 2–10 kDa) of the fraction P1-RPC-C18; b Mass spectrometry profile of the fraction P4-MEC (arrow) showing the mono-charged (4241 Da) and the doubly charged (2122 Da) peptide-ions. The chromatography was performed in isocratic conditions using 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, and 250 mM NaCl at 0.1 ml.min−1. Peaks were collected at 1.0 mL.min−1

Fraction P4-MEC was then exploited to identify and characterize the peptide of 4240 Da. The alkylation with dithiothreitol of two aliquots of the fraction P4-MEC, with previous reduction of only one aliquot, demonstrated the presence of eight cysteine residues involved in four disulfide bonds. MS analysis has detected the mass of 4706 Da for the reduced peptide (see Additional file 3), considering addition of 57.05 Da of iodoacetamide to eight reduced and alkylated sulfhydryl radical. This peptide could be member of one of three families of plant natural peptides, which are Defensins, Thionins, or Heveins, presenting about 4–5 kDa and four disulfide bonds [4].

Automatic Edman sequencing of the P4-MEC fraction, by using liquid sample or membrane, indicated the N-terminal peptide sequence as 1QN_ _RQAGGR10, although in low yield. The scarcity and the difficulty of obtaining peptide sample with high purity led to the search of computer tools in association with MS analysis aiming to characterize the isolated peptide.

Peptide identification by mass spectrometry and computational tools

Aliquots of the P4-MEC fraction after trypsinolysis and analysis on MALDI-TOF/TOF by MS1 spectrum (Fig. 3a), using the PMF procedure [62] and FlexAnalysis (Bruker) and Mascot tools, resulted in the identification of the Antifungal Protein [C. annuum] [GI:18478476, GenBank:AAL73184.1, UniProtKB:Q8W2B2_CAPAN], with 9748 Da and pI 8.73, but not significant (for P < 0.05). The region with sequence similarity corresponds to residues from 31 to 60 of the Antifungal Protein, which has 85 amino acid residues (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3

Mass spectrometry (MS1) analysis of the peptide fraction P4-MEC after trypsinization. a MS1 profile obtained in MALDI-TOF/TOF; b Sequence of the Antifungal Protein [Capsicum annuum] [UniProtKB:Q8W2B2_CAPAN] identified by peptide mass fingerprinting, although as not-significant (for P < 0.05). Ions with m/z-values of 1461; 1593; 1617; and 2193 Da matched fragments of the Antifungal Protein at positions 31 to 60 after the theoretical trypsinolysis using PeptideCutter software

In silico proteolysis of the Antifungal Protein [GI:18478476] sequence using the PeptideCuttter software has produced fragments with mass values identical to the ion masses obtained in MS1 spectrum of the peptide in question: 1461.6; 1593.8; 1617.6; and 2194.5 Da (Table 1). ProtParam software confirmed the mass-values of the theoretical peptide sequences, alkylated or not, by confrontation with mass values of the MS1 spectrum. The MS2 spectra of the four ions were obtained and automatically analyzed by Peptide Fragment Fingerprint (PFF) [62] and MASCOT tools, and showed no significant identification of proteins. Ions in the MS2 spectra were also analyzed by manual de novo sequencing, and the sequences of these ions have matched with the sequences of fragments of the same mass, which were obtained by in silico proteolysis, in positions between 31 and 60 of the Antifungal Protein [GI:18478476].

Table 1 Ionic fragments obtained from the theoretical cleavage of the Antifungal Protein using PeptideCutter

P4-MEC fraction was again trypsinized targeting a significant identification of the peptide. Samples were collected at 6, 12, 24, and 36 h after proteolysis, and MS1 and MS2 spectra were analyzed for all samples. Using the PMF tool, the Antifungal Protein [C. annuum] [GI:18478476] and Chitin Biding Protein [C. annuum] [GI:169930135, GenBank:ACB05666.1] with 9718 Da and pI 8.93 were identified in the sample with 12 h of trypsinolysis in the NCBI database, but not with a significant sequence similarity although with 35% coverage and 3 matches. In analysis of the MS2 spectra by PFF, the identification of the antifungal protein was significant in NCBI DB for two fragments in all trypsinization times. For the fragment of 1461 Da, the analysis time and score/threshold-values (P <0.05) were: 6 h, 82/31; 12 h, 87/42; 24 h, 92/39; and 36 h; 52/38. Similarly for the fragment of 1593 Da: 6 h, 87/34; 12 h, 88/33; 24 h, 86/33; and 36 h, 87/34. Manual de novo sequencing for these two ions and for ions with 1290 and 1502 Da in MS1 spectrum confirmed the previously found sequences (Table 2).

Table 2 De novo sequencing of ions of the P4-MEC fraction after controlled trypsinolysisa

Then, we propose the partial sequence of the peptide, with 30 residues, named as AMP-CANN (Fig. 4). AMP-CANN refers to “antimicrobial peptide from C. annuum” since Games et al. [63], in our laboratory have shown that these fractions, enriched in peptide by fractionation with ammonium sulfate and chromatography, partially controlled the in vitro growth of the phytopathogenic bacteria Ralstonia solanacearum, Clavibacter michiganensis ssp. michiganensis and Erwinia carotovora ssp. carotovora, and of the fungus Alternaria solani. Growth inhibition assays were also successfully performed with P1-RPC-C18 fraction for Ralstonia solanacearum (Gram-negative) and Clavibacter michiganensis ssp. michiganensis (Gram-positive) (Fig. 5).

Fig. 4

Alignment of the proposed sequence for AMP-CANN after tandem mass spectrometry and de novo sequencing. Identity for 30 amino acid residues was detected with the Antifungal Protein [Capsicum annuum] [GI:18478476] and the Chitin Biding Protein [Capsicum annuum] [GI:169930135] at positions 31 to 60

Fig. 5

Antimicrobial activity of the peptide fraction P1-RFC-C18. The antimicrobial activity assays of the peptide fraction were against the phytopathogenic bacteria Clavibacter michiganensis ssp. michiganensis (Gram-positive, a) and Rasltonia solanacearum (Gram-negative, b)

The sequence of 30 residues was used to identify the peptide in databases (DB) (Table 3). Analysis using Blast tool in non-redundant (nr) NCBI-RefSeq DB showed sequence similarity (P < 0.05) for six proteins containing chitin binding domain (CBD). Similarly, in UniProtKB, eleven sequences of heveins and CBD of Hevea brasiliensis (HEVBR) were identified, seven of which showed aligned regions with the sequence of AMP-CANN. Thereby, this peptide is a hevein-like extracted from C. annuum, and will be called HEV-CANN from now on.

Table 3 Bioinformatics tolls and sites mentioned in the text

In order to complete the sequencing of the peptide, searches were conducted aligning sequences in the specific DB Antimicrobial Peptide Search (APD2) and Database Linking MPAs, without successful results about similarity in general or for species-specific searches. In the portal Bioactive Peptide Databases, Amper DB detected alignment (P < 0.05) with two mature Hevein fragments from Hevea brasiliensis and Eucommia ulmoides; CAMP found 16 Hevein-like and/or CBD-protein that showed significant alignments (E-value from 2e-16 to 6e-8). PhytAMP DB showed significant alignment for HEV-CANN with the sequence of the antimicrobial peptide Hevein from Hevea brasiliensis [PhytAMP:PHYT00231, HEV-PHYT00231], which is 43 amino acid residues and corresponds to the residues between 18 and 60 of the Pro-Hevein protein [UniProt:P02877-HEVE_HEVBR], with 204 residues.

Alignment of HEV-CANN, HEV-PHYT00231, seven sequences of HEVBR and two sequences of C. annuum, which had presented significant match with HEV-CANN (Fig. 6a), showed a high similarity in the region corresponding to the CBD, near the amino-terminal region of the major sequences. Comparing the residues obtained in the automatic sequencing (1QN_ _RQAGGR10) with the correspondent residues in Fig. 6a, we suggest that the initial HEV-CANN sequence is 1QNCGRQAGGR10 (Fig. 6b).

Fig. 6

HEV-CANN and other Hevein-like sequences. a The proteins with sequences aligned with HEV-CANN were the Antifungal Protein [GI:18478476] and the Chitin Biding Protein [GI:169930135], both from Capsicum annuum; the peptide Hevein (HEV-PHYT00231); and seven Hevein-like from Hevea brasiliensis. b The complete sequence of HEV-CANN

Analysis of the complete HEV-CANN sequence using ProtParam software indicated that it was a stable peptide with 40 amino acid residues, eight-Cys residues, and 4258.8 Da since 8 Da were deducted by the presence of four disulfide bonds. Theoretical pI-value was 8.78 and grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY) was −0.465, with five positively charged residues and one negatively charged residue, corresponding to a cationic peptide. HEV-CANN is a stable peptide, with instability index (II) computed to be 23.99/40. HEV-CANN characteristics are partially according to those of Hevein peptide from Hevea brasiliensis, HEV-PHYT00231 [PhyTAMP:PHYT00231, UniProt:P02877, EMBL:M36986], with 43 amino acid residues, 4727.1 Da, eight cysteine residues, four disulfide bonds, theoretical pI-value of 4.83, and GRAVY-value of −1.019, three positively charged residues and five negatively charged residues. HEV-PHYT00231 was classified as unstable, with instability index (II) computed to be 46.41/40.

HEV-CANN and HEV-PHYT00231 showed alignment with the conserved region of the CBD of the Pro-Hevein with 204 residues [UniProt:P02877-HEVE_HEVBR], near the amino-terminus of members of ChtBD1-Superfamily [CDD:cl16916], with E-value of 4.89e-08 for the alignment (see Additional file 4). HEV-CANN proved to be a member of the Superfamily Hevein [64], also called type 1 chitin-binding-domain [CDD:cl16916].

The search for alignment of HEV-CANN sequence using the PSI-BLAST tool, which provides a means of detecting distant relationships between proteins from different sources, showed 963 results for alignment with e-values lower than the defined threshold 0f 0.005. The best alignment for all tested rounds were for chitin-binding protein [C. annuum] [GenBank:ACB05666.1] and antifungal protein [C. annuum] [GenBank:AAL73184.1], both presenting identical parameters that are total/maximum score 79/79, 98% identity, 100% query cover, and E-value of 2e-17. For C. annuum, the five hits obtained showed proteins related to plant defense, which are chitin binding protein [GenBank:ACB05666.1], E-value of 2e-17; antifungal protein [GenBank:AAL73184.1], E-value of 2e-17; wound-induced protein CBP1 precursor [GenBank:AAF18934.1], E-value: 1e-06, pathogenesis-related protein 4b [GenBank:AEI52548.1], E-value: 2e-06, and chitinase [GenBank:ACM47315.1], E-value: 4e-06. Most proteins have been identified as class I chitinases; some were class 4 pathogenesis-related protein (PR-4) (see Additional file 4), other antifungal proteins, wound-induced protein, and/or Hevein-like proteins. For Solanum tuberosum (potato) and Solanum lycopersicum (tomato), 22 hits (E-values: 5e-10 to 8e-6) and 7 hits (E-values: 5e-8 to 9e-6), respectively, showed alignment with chitinases or wound-induced proteins. All detected protein classes are involved in plant defense against phytopathogens.

Searches for sequence alignments were also carried out at The Pepper Genome Database (release 2.0), using the database Capsicum.annuum.var.glabriusculum_Chiltepin_v2.0_PEP.fasta, containing 34,476 sequences, and recovered 10 sequences producing significant alignments and E-values as low as from 5e13 to 8e8. The identified proteins were chitinases, chitin-binding proteins, antifungal proteins, heveins, and/or PR-4 proteins, similarly to those found for general databases, indicating that HEV-CANN are involved in plant defense against phytopathogens.


HEV-CANN, an antimicrobial Hevein-like peptide with 4.26 kDa and pI-value of 8.8 was isolated in this work from bell pepper leaves and characterized as a member of the type-1 chitin-binding domain superfamily (ChtBD1-Superfamily) in plants [26]. Hevein-like peptides have a CBD, also called Hevein-domain, which is characteristic of the plant kingdom and exhibit antifungal activities. The binding of CBD to chitin reduces or stops the elongation of the cell wall of fungi. CDB is present in multi-domain PR-proteins [65] such as chitinase (classes I and IV of the PR-3 family, and Class I of the PR-4 family), agglutinins and lectins. Archer [66] reported the first antimicrobial peptide from Hevein class, HEV-PHYT00231, isolated from Hevea brasiliensis, with 4.73 kDa and pI-value of 4.8. The peptide HEV-PHYT00231 corresponds to the CBD region of Pro-Hevein [UniProt:P02877] and other chitin-binding proteins. Since chitin is essential for the skeleton of the fungal cell wall, and is not present in vertebrates, CBD offers specificity to Hevein-like proteins or peptides in controlling fungal pathogenesis.

HEV-CANN also presented activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, while HEV-PHYT00231 was not able to inhibited Gram-negative bacteria [67]. Some Hevein-like peptide control the growth of bacteria or fungi chitin-free with participation of the cationic and amphipathic surface [26, 68]. HEV-CANN is a cationic molecule and present five positive charges on surface and HEV-PHYT00231 is anionic and has three positive charges on the surface; both are classified as plant antimicrobial peptides (AMPs).

Although evolutionarily ancient, the wide range of plant AMPs is poorly understood regarding the structural, biological and functional properties, distribution profile in the source organisms and tissue expression profile [23]. HEV-CANN has shown to be a member of the constitutive defense in bell pepper leaves, which is valuable for the study and application if compared with induced AMPs. Constitutive AMPs are not expressed transiently, reducing difficulties of recovering the peptides during the separation from contaminants. Proteomic and computational tools have been successfully employed in this work to isolate, identify and/or partially characterize HEV-CANN, which has shown promising features to biotechnology exploitation.

HEV-CANN showed up as a soluble peptide under hydrophilic conditions, according to GRAVY-value. The aggregation that is characteristic of many vegetable AMPs generates losses during isolation. Aggregates presenting high molecular weight are removed from the peptide samples together with the larger proteins, which was not observed in this study (Fig. 1a). The high solubility of HEV-CANN allowed the efficient use of ultrafiltration equipment in this work. Industrial versions of ultrafiltration devices are available and can be successfully used to enrich the peptide in a stepwise process. Cross-flow filtration equipment are also available and perform this task efficiently [69].

HEV-CANN presented other characteristics that favor the study. Ease of HEV-CANN ionization in MS analysis yielded spectra with high intensities and defined peaks, which ensured the success of the fragmentation analyses for MS2 and the completion of the manual de novo sequencing for the ions used to unravel the primary sequence of the peptide. The high stability of HEV-CANN, with index less than 40 [70], also favors the study of this peptide and is possibly influenced by the presence of four disulfide bonds in the small molecule.

Careful sample preparation, isolation with high efficiency equipment, mass spectrometry and computational tools are generally indispensable to the study and exploration of unknown bioactive peptides. This work highlighted the usefulness of records and in silico analysis for the study of plant AMPs. However, the computational tools for proteomics and databases are not adjusted for short sequences, which hinders the significant identification of plant peptides smaller than 10 kDa. E-value for sequence alignments depends directly on the length of the database and inversely the length of the query sequence [36]. Consequently, it became evident that exists a necessity to adjust or develop computational tools, and also build specific databases to assist in the identification and characterization of plant AMPs for academic and/or biotechnological purposes.

The Pepper Genome Database (release 2.0), specific to C. annuum sequence data, rendered significant alignments for proteins but not for peptides. CAMP, a DB for antimicrobial peptides, identified sequences corresponding to larger proteins, and only PhytAMP DB identified significant alignment for a peptide sequence. Therefore, it is essential to adjust or develop computational tools to allow significant identification of peptides despite their small amino acid sequences. Statistical analysis should consider that as short sequences as the HEV-CANN can match the full sequence of a peptide. Information of secondary structure, tertiary and functional domains are also desirable in peptide databases, since not always the primary sequence is highly conserved.

The success of heterologous expression of Hevein-like peptides in heterologous bacterial or plant models [3133] allows us to view HEV-CANN as promising in the transformation to enhance the constitutive protection of plants and thus develop genotypes more resistant to disease. An alternative is to express the peptide in the same plant species or closely related species and generate cisgenic plants [71]. Natural agrochemicals [34] can be produced from plant extracts enriched in HEV-CANN. Possible uses are for plants grown in greenhouses or in post-harvest agricultural products (fruits, vegetables, and grains) to increase shelf life, or marketable seed protection. Smart packaging or waxes containing defense peptides such as HEV-CANN, could control pathogens, reduce transpiration and give better appearance to agricultural products, improving marketing [72]. Nanotechnology, expanding, will offer methods of encapsulation to better distribute AMPS in plant tissues, with slow and steady release [73]. The plant molecular farming, known as farming or biofarming, involves the heterologous expression of AMPs in plant-based systems [21] and ensures the production of the peptide on a large scale for biotechnological use.

Production of AMP in plants certainly shows great promise for biotechnological use in sectors such as agribusiness, pharmaceutical, cosmetics and food [74]. However, there are technical limitations to be solved beforehand about the AMPs, as characterization and stability of bioactive molecules, synthesis of large numbers of disulfide bonds, functionality, and production. Information about functional structures, action mechanisms, spectrum of antimicrobial activity, and structural and kinetic stability show to be essential to the development of defense agents for biofarming of AMPs. For this, peptidomics tools [35] and computational tools applied to peptidomics need to advance greatly in allowing identify and characterize as significant the native peptide sequences by aligning sequences in specific databases.


The HEV-CANN peptide, purified and partially characterized in this work, is promising as antimicrobial for developing biotechnological defense agents. HEV-CANN is a constitutive 40-residues peptide with four disulfide bonds, cationic, soluble and stable under hydrophilic conditions. It is member of the plant AMPs Hevein-like family with a chitin-binding domains; active against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, and against a fungus-test.

Genetic modifications of HEV-CANN, including by cisgenesis, may be performed to produce plants more resistant or to develop biofarming. In biofarming, HEV-CANN can be synthesized constitutively in large scale using plant systems to express natural defense compounds for agricultural and other uses. The biotechnological application of HEV-CANN proves to be promising but the structural and functional characterization of the peptide must first be completed, which needs of large amounts of purified and active peptide. Expression in heterologous microbial system or in the same plant species is shown as an alternative of producing HEV-CANN for studies. The extraction procedures are hard and expensive because natural peptides are synthesized in very low concentrations in unmodified plants.

Peptidomics tools are scarce and proteomic tools fail to identify significant peptides, even using databases for organisms with sequenced genome. The databases are deficient in information for peptides and proteins up to 30 kDa. Thus, there is a pressing need to develop computational tools and to build specific databases to work with peptides. The AMPs are members of the innate defense of all living systems. The understanding of the defense mechanisms of organisms by AMPs action requires efficient tools. In addition, AMPs are a source of antimicrobial defense mechanisms underexplored. The bioinformatics tools are especially valuable for protein and peptide studies due to structural and/or functional similarities of these molecules among the organisms. The adjustment of statistical tests in large databases for proteins is an alternative to promote the significant identification of peptides, which are small molecules. In addition, the development of specific databases for plant AMPs, with information about amino acid sequences, transcriptomic and genomic data, structural motifs and domains, functional domains, and peptide-biomolecule interactions are valuable and necessary.



Antimicrobial peptides


Capsicum annuum


Chitin binding domain


Grand average of hydropathicity


Hevea brasiliensis


Hevein-like peptide from Capsicum annuum

IC50 :

Concentration for 50% growth inhibition


Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization tandem time-of-flight mass spectrometer


Molecular exclusion chromatography


Mass spectrometry


MS in the first analyzers


MS in tandem


Fraction P1 eluted from a RPC-C18


Fraction P2 eluted from a RPC-C4


Fraction P4 eluted from a MEC


Peptide fragment fingerprinting


Peptide mass fingerprinting


Reverse-phase chromarography


RPC in C18-column


RPC in C4-column


Soluble extract


SE enriched in peptides from 1–10 kDa


  1. 1.

    Farooq M, Jabran K, Cheema ZA, Wahid A, Siddique KH. The role of allelopathy in agricultural pest management. Pest Manag Sci. 2011;67(5):493–506.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Gould IM. Antibiotic resistance: the perfect storm. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009;34:S2–5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Zeitler B, Herrera-Diaz A, Dangel A, Thellmann M, Meyer H, Sattler M, Lindermayr C. De-novo design of antimicrobial peptides for plant protection. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e71687.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    García-Olmedo F, Rodriguez-Palenzuela P, Molina A, Alamillo JM, López-Solanilla E, Berrocal-Lobo M, Poza-Carrión C. Antibiotic activities of peptides, hydrogen peroxide and peroxynitrite in plant defence. FEBS Lett. 2001;498(2–3):219–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Rogozhin EA, Ryazantsev DY, Grishin EV, Egorov TA, Zavriev SK. Defense peptides from barnyard grass (Echinochloa crusgalli L.) seeds. Peptides. 2012;38(1):33–40.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Otero-González AJ, Magalhães BS, Garcia-Villarino M, López-Abarrategui C, Sousa DA, Dias SC, Franco OL. Antimicrobial peptides from marine invertebrates as a new frontier for microbial infection control. FASEB J. 2010;24(5):1320–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Montesinos E. Antimicrobial peptides and plant disease control. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007;270(1):1–11.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    de Souza-Cândido E, Sousa DA, Viana JC, de Oliveira-Júnior NG, Miranda V, Franco OL. The use of versatile plant antimicrobial peptides in agribusiness and human health. Peptides. 2014;55:65–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Maróti G, Downie JA, Kondorosi É. Plant cysteine-rich peptides that inhibit pathogen growth and control rhizobial differentiation in legume nodules. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2015;26:57–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Zhang L, Yang D, Wang Q, Yuan Z, Wu H, Pei D, Conga M, Lia F, Jia C, Zhao J. A defensin from clam Venerupis philippinarum: molecular characterization, localization, antibacterial activity, and mechanism of action. Dev Comp Immunol. 2015;51(1):29–38.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Golshani F, Fakheri BA, Behshad E, Vashvaei RM. PRs proteins and their mechanism in plants. Biological Forum. 2015;7(1):477–95.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hintz T, Matthews KK, Di R. The use of plant antimicrobial compounds for food preservation. Biomed Res Int. 2015. Article ID 246264.

  13. 13.

    Nawrot R, Barylski J, Nowicki G, Broniarczyk J, Buchwald W, Goździcka-Józefiak A. Plant antimicrobial peptides. Folia Microbiol. 2014;59(3):181–96.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Yan J, Yuan SS, Jiang LL, Ye XJ, Ng TB, Wu ZJ. Plant antifungal proteins and their applications in agriculture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99(12):4961–81.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Salas CE, Badillo-Corona JA, Ramírez-Sotelo G, Oliver-Salvador C. Biologically active and antimicrobial peptides from plants. Biomed Res Int. 2015. Article ID 102129. 11 pages.

  16. 16.

    Tavares LS, Santos MDO, Viccini LF, Moreira JS, Miller RN, Franco OL. Biotechnological potential of antimicrobial peptides from flowers. Peptides. 2008;29(10):1842–51.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Remuzgo C, Oewel TS, Daffre S, Lopes TR, Dyszy FH, Schreier S, Machado-Santelli GM, Machini MT. Chemical synthesis, structure–activity relationship, and properties of shepherin I: a fungicidal peptide enriched in glycine-glycine-histidine motifs. Amino Acids. 2014;46(11):2573–86.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wu WH. The antibacterial mode of action and properties of Ib-AMP1, a plant-derived antimicrobial peptide, against Escherichia coli O157: H7, Doctoral dissertation. New Brunswick: Rutgers University-Graduate School; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Egorov TA, Odintsova TI. Defense peptides of plant immunity. Russ J Bioorg Chem. 2012;38(1):1–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Guzmán-Rodríguez JJ, Ochoa-Zarzosa A, López-Gómez R, López-Meza JE. Plant antimicrobial peptides as potential anticancer agents. Biomed Res Int. 2015. Article ID 735087, 11 pages.

  21. 21.

    Holásková E, Galuszka P, Frébort I, Öz MT. Antimicrobial peptide production and plant-based expression systems for medical and agricultural biotechnology. Biotechnol Adv. 2015;33(6):1005–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Dubovskii PV, Vassilevski AA, Slavokhotova AA, Odintsova TI, Grishin EV, Egorov TA, Arseniev AS. Solution structure of a defense peptide from wheat with a 10-cysteine motif. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;411(1):14–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Astafieva AA, Rogozhin EA, Odintsova TI, Khadeeva NV, Grishin EV, Egorov TA. Discovery of novel antimicrobial peptides with unusual cysteine motifs in dandelion Taraxacum officinale Wigg. flowers. Peptides. 2012;36(2):266–71.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Andreev YA, Korostyleva TV, Slavokhotova AA, Rogozhin EA, Utkina LL, Vassilevski AA, Grishin EV, Egorov TA, Odintsova TI. Genes encoding hevein-like defense peptides in wheat: distribution, evolution, and role in stress response. Biochimie. 2012;94(4):1009–16.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Slavokhotova AA, Naumann TA, Price NP, Rogozhin EA, Andreev YA, Vassilevski AA, Odintsova TI. Novel mode of action of plant defense peptides–hevein‐like antimicrobial peptides from wheat inhibit fungal metalloproteases. FEBS J. 2014;281(20):4754–64.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Porto WF, Souza VA, Nolasco DO, Franco OL. In silico identification of novel hevein-like peptide precursors. Peptides. 2012;38(1):127–36.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Marmiroli N, Maestri E. Plant peptides in defense and signaling. Peptides. 2014;56:30–44.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Odintsova TI, Korostyleva TV, Utkina LL, Andreev YA, Slavokhotova AA, Istomina EA, Pukhal’skii VA, Egorov TA. Wheat antimicrobial peptides. Russ J Genet. 2013;3(1):40–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Dias RDO, Machado LDS, Migliolo L, Franco OL. Insights into animal and plant lectins with antimicrobial activities. Molecules. 2015;20(1):519–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Odintsova TI, Vassilevski AA, Slavokhotova AA, Musolyamov AK, Finkina EI, Khadeeva NV, Rogozhin EA, Korostyleva TV, Pukhalsky VA, Grishin EV, Egorov TA. A novel antifungal hevein‐type peptide from Triticum kiharae seeds with a unique 10‐cysteine motif. FEBS J. 2009;276(15):4266–75.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Utkina LL, Zhabon EO, Slavokhotova AA, Rogozhin EA, Shiyan AN, Grishin EV, Egorov TA, Odintsova TI, Pukhal’skiĭ VA. Heterologous expression of a synthetic gene encoding a novel hevein-type antimicrobial peptide of Leymus arenarius in Escherichia coli cells. Russ J Genet. 2010;46(12):1449–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Khaliluev M, Mamonov AG, Smirnov AN, Kharchenko PN, Dolgov SV. Expression of genes encoding chitin binding proteins (PR 4) and hevein-like antimicrobial peptides in transgenic tomato plants enhanced resistance to Phytophthora infestance. Russ Agric Sci. 2011;37(4):297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Shukurov RR, Voblikova VD, Nikonorova AK, Egorov TA, Grishin EV, Babakov AV. Increase of resistance of Arabidopsis thaliana plants to phytopathogenic fungi expressing hevein-like peptides from weed plant Stellaria media. Russ Agric Sci. 2010;36(4):265–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Tessarollo NG, Carrijo LC, Barbosa MO, Almeida HO, Pereira THA, Magalhães-Jr MJ, Leite JPV, Pereira PRG, Baracat-Pereira MC. Agrochemicals in medicinal plants: hydrophilic macromolecules from leaves of mil folhas (Achillea millefolium L.) inhibit in vitro growth of phytopathogenic bacteria. Braz J Med Plants. 2013;15(2):180–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Schulz-Knappe P, Hans-Dieter Z, Heine G, Jurgens M, Schrader M. Peptidomics the comprehensive analysis of peptides in complex biological mixtures. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2001;4(2):207–17.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Altschul SF, Gish W. Local alignment statistics. Methods Enzymol. 1996;266:460–80.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Teixeira FR, Lima MCOP, Almeida HO, Romeiro RS, Silva DJH, Pereira PRG, Fontes EPB, Baracat-Pereira MC. Bioprospection of cationic and anionic antimicrobial peptides from bell pepper leaves for inhibition of Ralstonia solanacearum and Clavibacter michiganensis ssp. michiganensis growth. J Phytopathol. 2006;154(7–8):418–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Smith PK, Krohn RI, Hermanson GT, Mallia AK, Gartner FH, Provenzano MD, Fujimoto EK, Goeke NM, Olson BJ, Klenk DC. Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal Biochem. 1985;150(1):76–85.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Schägger H. Tricine–SDS-PAGE. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:16–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Neuhoff V, Arold N, Taube D, Ehrhardt W. Improved staining of proteins in polyacrylamide gels including isoelectric focusing gels with clear background at nanogram sensitivity using Coomassie Brilliant Blue G‐250 and R‐250. Electrophoresis. 1988;9(6):255–62.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Wu Y, Engen JR. What mass spectrometry can reveal about protein function. Analyst. 2004;129(4):290–6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Shevchenko A, Tomas H, Havlis J, Olsen JV, Mann M. In-gel digestion for mass spectrometric characterization of proteins and proteomes. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(6):2856–60.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Perkins DN, Pappin DJ, Creasy DM, Cottrell JS. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis. 1999;20(18):3551–67.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Pruitt KD, Tatusova T, Maglott DR. NCBI Reference Sequence (RefSeq): a curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33 Suppl 1:D501–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Bairoch A, Boeckmann B. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19(Suppl):2247–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Ma B, Johnson R. De novo sequencing and homology searching. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11:O111.014902. doi:10.1074/mcp.O111.014902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Minkiewicz P, Dziuba J, Iwaniak A, Dziuba M, Darewicz M. BIOPEP database and other programs for processing bioactive peptide sequences. J AOAC Int. 2008;91:965–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Qin C, Yu C, Shen Y, Fang X, Chen L, Min J, Cheng J, Zhao S, Xu M, Luo Y, Yang Y, Wu Z, Mao L, Wu H, Ling-Hu C, Zhou H, Lin H, González-Morales S, Trejo-Saavedra DL, Tian H, Tang X, Zhao M, Huang Z, Zhou A, Yao X, Cui J, Li W, Chen Z, Feng Y, Niu Y, Bi S, Yang X, Li W, Cai H, Luo X, Montes-Hernández S, Leyva-González MA, Xiong Z, He X, Bai L, Tan S, Tang X, Liu D, Liu J, Zhang S, Chen M, Zhang L, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Liao W, Zhang Y, Wang M, Lv X, Wen B, Liu H, Luan H, Zhang Y, Yang S, Wang X, Xu J, Li X, Li S, Wang J, Palloix A, Bosland PW, Li Y, Krogh A, Rivera-Bustamante RF, Herrera-Estrella L, Yin Y, Yu J, Hu K, Zhang Z. Whole-genome sequencing of cultivated and wild peppers provides insights into Capsicum domestication and specialization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(14):5135–40.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Altschul SF, Wootton JC, Gertz EM, Agarwala R, Morgulis A, Schäffer AA, Yu YK. Protein database searches using compositionally adjusted substitution matrices. FEBS J. 2005;272(20):5101–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Benson D, Lipman DJ, Ostell J. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993;21(13):2963–5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Boutet E, Lieberherr D, Tognolli M, Schneider M, Bairoch A. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot. The manually annotated section of the UniProt KnowledgeBase. In: Edwards D, editor. Plant bioinformatics: methods and protocols, vol. 406. New Jersey: Humana Press; 2007. p. 89–112. Methods Mol Biol.

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Wang G, Li X, Wang Z. APD2: the updated antimicrobial peptide database and its application in peptide design. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37 suppl 1:D933–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Zhao X, Wu H, Lu H, Li G, Huang Q. Lamp: a database linking antimicrobial peptides. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66557. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066557.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Fjell CD, Hancock RE, Cherkasov A. AMPer: a database and an automated discovery tool for antimicrobial peptides. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(9):1148–55.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Thomas S, Karnik S, Barai RS, Jayaraman VK, Idicula-Thomas S. CAMP: a useful resource for research on antimicrobial peptides. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009. doi:10.1093/nar/gkp1021.

  56. 56.

    Hammami R, Hamida JB, Vergoten G, Fliss I. PhytAMP: a database dedicated to antimicrobial plant peptides. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37 suppl 1:D963–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, Lopez R, McWilliam H, Remmert M, Söding J, Thompson JD, Higgins DG. Fast, scalable generation of high‐quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7(1):539. doi:10.1038/msb.2011.75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    McWilliam H, Li W, Uludag M, Squizzato S, Park YM, Buso N, Cowley AP, Lopez R. Analysis tool web services from the EMBL-EBI. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(W1):W597–600.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215(3):403–10.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25(17):3389–402.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Gasteiger E, Hoogland C, Gattiker A, Wilkins MR, Appel RD, Bairoch A. Protein identification and analysis tools on the ExPASy server. In: Walker JM, editor. The proteomics protocols handbook. New Jersey: Humana Press; 2005. p. 571–607.

    Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Thiede B, Höhenwarter W, Krah A, Mattow J, Schmid M, Schmidt F, Jungblut PR. Peptide mass fingerprinting. Methods. 2005;35(3):237–47.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Games PD, Koscky-Paier CR, Almeida-Souza HO, Barbosa MO, Antunes PWP, Carrijo LC, Pereira PRG, Baracat-Pereira MC. In vitro anti-bacterial and anti-fungal activities of hydrophilic plant defence compounds obtained from the leaves of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). J Hortic Sci Biotech. 2013;88(5):551–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Marchler-Bauer A, Derbyshire MK, Gonzales NR, Lu S, Chitsaz F, Geer LY, Geer RC, He J, Gwadz M, Hurwitz DI, Lanczycki CJ, Lu F, Marchler GH, Song JS, Thanki N, Wang Z, Yamashita RA, Zhang D, Zheng C, Bryant SH. CDD: NCBI’s conserved domain database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014. doi:10.1093/nar/gku1221.

  65. 65.

    Sels J, Mathys J, De Coninck BM, Cammue BP, De Bolle MF. Plant pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins: a focus on PR peptides. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2008;46(11):941–50.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Archer BL. The proteins of Hevea brasiliensis latex. 4. Isolation and characterization of crystalline hevein. Biochem J. 1960;75(2):236–40.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Kanokwiroon K, Teanpaisan R, Wititsuwannakul D, Hooper AB, Wititsuwannakul R. Antimicrobial activity of a protein purified from the latex of Hevea brasiliensis on oral microorganisms. Mycoses. 2008;51(4):301–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Tavormina P, De Coninck B, Nikonorova N, De Smet I, Cammue BP. The plant peptidome: an expanding repertoire of structural features and biological functions. Plant Cell. 2015;27(8):2095–118.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Lipnizki F. Cross-flow membrane applications in the food industry. In: Peinemann K-V, Pereira-Nunes S, Giorno L, editors. Membranes for food applications, vol. 3. Weinheim: Willey-VCH; 2010. p. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Guruprasad K, Reddy BB, Pandit MW. Correlation between stability of a protein and its dipeptide composition: a novel approach for predicting in vivo stability of a protein from its primary sequence. Protein Eng. 1990;4(2):155–61.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Holme IB, Wendt T, Holm PB. Intragenesis and cisgenesis as alternatives to transgenic crop development. Plant Biotechnol J. 2013;11(4):395–407.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Morgado CMA, Durigan JF, Sanches J, Galati VC, Ogassavara FO. Conservação pós-colheita de frutos de pimentão sob diferentes condições de armazenamento e filmes. Hortic Bras. 2008;26:170–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Perez-de-Luqye A, Rubiales D. Nanotechnology for parasitic plant control. Pest Manag Sci. 2009;65(5):540–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Parachin NS, Mulder KC, Viana AAB, Dias SC, Franco OL. Expression systems for heterologous production of antimicrobial peptides. Peptides. 2012;38(2):446–56.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank the EMATER (Coimbra-MG, Brazil) for supplying the bell pepper seedlings, the Department of Plant Pathology (UFV) for supplying the microorganisms, BIOAGRO (UFV) for greenhouse facilities for plant cultivation, and Núcleo de Análise de Biomoléculas (UFV) and LEM-CENARGEN (Embrapa, Brasília-DF, Brazil) for mass spectrometry and amino acid sequencing analysis.


This article has been published as part of BMC Genomics Volume 17 Supplement 12, 2016. Proceedings of X-meeting 2015: 11th International Conference of the AB3C + Brazilian Symposium on Bioinformatics: genomics. The full contents of the supplement are available online


The authors thank the Brazilian Agencies FAPEMIG (CAG 782/02 and Fellowships), FINEP (CT-INFRA/UFV-2004/2007/2008), CNPq (Grant PQ-306969/2010-6) and CAPES (Fellowships) for financial support. Publication charges for this article have been funded by FAPEMIG.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

PDG cultivated plants, planned and participated in all activities of isolation, identification and characterization of the peptide using proteomics tools, performed antimicrobial assays, and drafted and reviewed the manuscript. EQGS participated in the activities of isolation, identification and characterization of the peptide using proteomics tools and performed antimicrobial assays. MOB, HOAS, PPF and MJMJ participated in the activities of isolation, identification and characterization of the peptide using proteomics tools. PRGP planned planting and cultivated plants, led discussions on the involvement of peptides in plant defense, and reviewed and edited the manuscript. MVP conducted and advised analyzes of automatic peptide sequencing and advised mass spectrometry analyzes. GRF contributed in performing the computational analyzes. AFC and SVAC contributed in performing the computational analysis, reviewed and edited the manuscript. MCBP conceived the idea, designed and supervised all activities of work, performed the computational analyzes, and drafted, reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Cristina Baracat-Pereira.

Additional files

Additional file 1:

Isolation of the peptide fraction P1-RPC-C18 by reverse-phase chromatography in a C4-column (RPC-C4) and mass spectrometry profile showing the peptide ions. (PDF 66 kb)

Additional file 2:

Isolation of the peptide fraction P1-RPC18 by reverse-phase rechromatography in a C18-column (RPreC-C18) and mass spectrometry profile showing the peptide ions. (PDF 50 kb)

Additional file 3:

Determination of the number of disulfide bonds in HEV-CANN by mass spectrometry analysis of the fraction P4-MEC after reduction and alkylation, and after alkylation only. (PDF 49 kb)

Additional file 4:

Alignment of the HEV-CANN sequence with PR-4 proteins from plants showing the chitin-binding domain region of the peptide Hevein from Hevea brasiliensis (residues 18 to 60) and five sequences of pathogenesis-related proteins Class-4 (PR-4). (PDF 130 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Games, P.D., daSilva, E.Q.G., Barbosa, M.d.O. et al. Computer aided identification of a Hevein-like antimicrobial peptide of bell pepper leaves for biotechnological use. BMC Genomics 17, 999 (2016).

Download citation


  • Hevein-like
  • Antimicrobial peptide
  • Bell pepper
  • Plant defense
  • Peptidomics
  • Computational tools
  • Bioinformatics
  • Biotechnology