Skip to main content

A combined strategy involving Sanger and 454 pyrosequencing increases genomic resources to aid in the management of reproduction, disease control and genetic selection in the turbot (Scophthalmus maximus)



Genomic resources for plant and animal species that are under exploitation primarily for human consumption are increasingly important, among other things, for understanding physiological processes and for establishing adequate genetic selection programs. Current available techniques for high-throughput sequencing have been implemented in a number of species, including fish, to obtain a proper description of the transcriptome. The objective of this study was to generate a comprehensive transcriptomic database in turbot, a highly priced farmed fish species in Europe, with potential expansion to other areas of the world, for which there are unsolved production bottlenecks, to understand better reproductive- and immune-related functions. This information is essential to implement marker assisted selection programs useful for the turbot industry.


Expressed sequence tags were generated by Sanger sequencing of cDNA libraries from different immune-related tissues after several parasitic challenges. The resulting database (“Turbot 2 database”) was enlarged with sequences generated from a 454 sequencing run of brain-hypophysis-gonadal axis-derived RNA obtained from turbot at different development stages. The assembly of Sanger and 454 sequences generated 52,427 consensus sequences (“Turbot 3 database”), of which 23,661 were successfully annotated. A total of 1,410 sequences were confirmed to be related to reproduction and key genes involved in sex differentiation and maturation were identified for the first time in turbot (AR, AMH, SRY-related genes, CYP19A, ZPGs, STAR FSHR, etc.). Similarly, 2,241 sequences were related to the immune system and several novel key immune genes were identified (BCL, TRAF, NCK, CD28 and TOLLIP, among others). The number of genes of many relevant reproduction- and immune-related pathways present in the database was 50–90% of the total gene count of each pathway. In addition, 1,237 microsatellites and 7,362 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were also compiled. Further, 2,976 putative natural antisense transcripts (NATs) including microRNAs were also identified.


The combined sequencing strategies employed here significantly increased the turbot genomic resources available, including 34,400 novel sequences. The generated database contains a larger number of genes relevant for reproduction- and immune-associated studies, with an excellent coverage of most genes present in many relevant physiological pathways. This database also allowed the identification of many microsatellites and SNP markers that will be very useful for population and genome screening and a valuable aid in marker assisted selection programs.


The turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) is a flatfish with increasing commercial relevance in Europe with a current annual production of ~10,000 tones [1] with an increasing consumer demand worldwide. Thus, turbot production significantly increased in Northern China during the last decade. However, fish disease outbreaks collapsed its production in 2006, with economic losses estimated to amount several hundred million Euros [2, 3].

It seems clear that one of the major concerns for turbot aquaculture is disease control. Intensive culture conditions in fish farms favors the proliferation of pathogens and the consequent economic losses associated with disease outbreaks. Hence, a comprehensive knowledge of the immune system of commercially important fish species is required [4]. The immune-prophylactic control of fish diseases through vaccination, probiotics and immunostimulation has been undertaken since long ago [57], whereas genetic programs on disease resistance, specifically in turbot, clearly require further investigation. Obtaining resistant broodstock is an appealing solution to control diseases in front of the economic cost of vaccines, treatments and the possible generation of resistances against antibiotics.

Another major concern for the aquaculture industry is fish reproduction. Like in other vertebrates, reproduction in turbot is controlled by the brain-pituitary-gonad axis, which integrates environmental signals and controls the production and secretion of the major hormones involved in controlling the reproductive cycle, including the onset of puberty [8, 9]. Furthermore, turbot exhibits one of the largest cases of sexual dimorphism for growth rate in favor of females among aquacultured species [10]. Therefore, there is an interest in the turbot aquaculture industry to produce stocks with as many females as possible in order to increase biomass. Gonad development is a complex biological process in which an undifferentiated bipotential gonad is transformed into either a testis or an ovary [11, 12] according to sex determination and differentiation [11, 13]. External factors such as temperature, pH or social behavior can directly influence gonadal development in some fish [14, 15] and, consequently, affect sex ratio. Understanding the process of gonadal development can greatly aid in the control of sex ratios in finfish aquaculture. However, in turbot there is a lack of information of genes involved in reproduction and their interactions. The induction of gynogenesis suggested a XX/XY system of sex determination [16], but later studies involving the analysis of progenies from sex-reversed parents revealed a ZW/ZZ system [17]. Linkage maps were developed [1821] and led to the identification of the major sex-determining region [22] and facilitated the characterization and mapping of sex-associated markers [23, 24], although the sex determining gene(s) is (are) still unknown.

Despite recent increases in the number of Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs) for flatfish [2528], their resources are still limited when compared to those available for salmonids (25,781 vs 851,722; GenBank). Particularly in turbot, only 12,427 entries were found but this number was recently raised up to 55,404 contigs [29]. During the last few years, efforts have been done to create a comprehensive turbot database with a large number of gene sequences available based on the immune response to the most common different pathogens of industrial relevance [3032]. These include Aeromonas salmonicida subspecies salmonicida, a bacterium capable of causing 100% mortalities in just 7 days after challenge [33], and the parasites Philasterides dicentrarchi and Enteromyxum scophthalmi, which are responsible for severe fish outbreaks [34, 35]. Therefore, the first Turbot database was originally created with almost ten thousand high-quality ESTs sequences [36] (Table 1). From this database, a first custom oligo-microarray (8X15 Agilent) was successfully designed [37] and applied for evaluating expression profiles of genes involved in defense against pathogens [38, 39].

Table 1 Increase of the genomic resources for the turbot ( S. maximus ) with the successive databases

Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) strategies have positively affected genetics research over the last few years and their advantages have been applied to many research fields. 454 FLX Titanium is a massive pyrosequencing strategy which generates medium-size single reads uncovering large amounts of DNA sequences providing much deeper sequencing coverage than it is possible with conventional Sanger sequencing [40]. Sequencing small subsets of the genome such as the transcriptome is an attractive alternative for gene discovery in species whose genome is still not available, and fish are not an exception. For example, in guppy (Poecilia reticulata) the sequencing of a total of 336 megabases (Mb) produced the first reference transcriptome for this fish species [41]. In the self-fertilizing hermaphroditic mangrove Rivulus, Kryptolebias marmoratus, the identification of more than 150,000 sequences provided the first insights on the mechanisms underlying the response to environmental stresses and chemical toxicities [42]; and in the gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata), the fast skeletal muscle transcriptome was described [43]. In particular, the reproductive system of the lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) has also been studied by resorting to modern pyrosequencing and it has been useful for the discovery and evaluation of candidate sex-determining genes and xenobiotic-responsive genes in the gonads [44, 45].

Another approach to improve the aquaculture production is based on the application of molecular markers such as microsatellites or simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and SNPs. These markers are the basis for genetic mapping and comparative genomic analysis, which are in turn used for detection of quantitative trait loci (QTL) and for marker assisted selection (MAS) programs [46, 47]. Several types of genetic markers have been developed and investigated in turbot [48] and many of them have already been mapped [1821]. Recently, a genome scan for sex-determination [22] and resistance/survival to A. salmonicida[49] and P. dicentrarchi[50] using the genetic map identified several consistent QTLs and associated markers in turbot, which suggests the existence of genetic factors underlying these characters and supports their application in genetic breeding strategies. The advents of new high-throughput sequencing technologies, which produce extensive sequence data, are providing new opportunities to increase the amount of molecular markers, as demonstrated in the sturgeon, where hundreds of SNPs were discovered [44].

Overall, the improvement of the turbot aquaculture industry by selecting, on one hand, the most resistant broodstock and, on the other hand, female-biased batches is a priority challenge. The purpose of this study was to increase turbot database information for genes related to the immune and reproductive systems by creating a powerful tool for genomic research in this species. The turbot database was updated with genes obtained both by Sanger sequencing from immune-related tissues after challenges with the myxozoan parasite E. scophthalmi and by a 454 FLX Titanium run from gonad and brain-hypophysis at different stages of development. Description and comparison of the two sequencing strategies, annotation procedures, and construction of a larger database, the support for microsatellites and SNP discovery, and for designing a pilot-microarray platform, are presented.

Results and discussion

The increase of known immune-related genes in turbot by Sanger sequencing

The progression in the construction of the turbot database is summarized in Table 1. First, the Turbot 1 database was created from almost ten thousand high-quality EST sequences from three cDNA libraries of three immune relevant organs (liver, head kidney and spleen) generated from turbot infected with A. salmonicida subspecies salmonicida and P. dicentrarchi, as well as from non-infected fish [36]. The Turbot 2 database included several resource sequences: i) 1,371 sequences from seven microsatellite-enriched DNA libraries from muscle tissues [51]; ii) 3,339 ESTs available in public databases [52], which were loaded on the turbot database and clustered with the set of the existing EST; and iii) Sanger sequencing data from two new cDNA libraries generated from several immune tissues (liver, head kidney, spleen, pyloric caeca and thymus) after challenging with the myxosporean parasite E. scophthalmi produced a total of 3,043 sequences (see Methods). Together, Sanger-based sequencing generated 17,626 sequences with an average length of 501 base pair (bp), constituting the Turbot 2 database. The assembly of all these available data consisted of 6,170 putative transcripts of which 1,827 were contigs and 4,343 singletons. A high level of redundancy was found (75.6%), which is usually observed when non-normalized cDNA libraries are used [53], but it constitutes an appropriate approach to obtain a first picture of the immune response [36].

A total of 6,053 out of the 6,170 unique sequences (98.1%) in Turbot 2 database displayed significant matches with sequences available in public databases with E-values equal or less than 1,00E-5 (6,049 with BLASTN and 2,116 with BLASTX). Gene Ontology (GO) annotation classified sequences as follows: 586 in Biological Process (BP), 472 in Cellular Component (CC) and 692 in Molecular Functions (MF).

454 pyrosequencing of the turbot brain-hypophysis-gonad axis transcriptome

The Turbot 2 database described above contained 17,626 sequences, many of them related to the immune response. However, further exploration of this database revealed that sequences related to reproduction, the other major issue for turbot farming, were underrepresented. In order to obtain more sequences of genes related to sex phenotype and reproduction control, and for isolation of EST-associated genetic markers, a 454-pyrosequencing run was performed from the brain-hypophysis-gonadal axis by using tissues of 30 turbot individuals at different stages of sexual development. Table 2 summarizes the statistics of the turbot pyrosequencing normalized library. Raw data generated 2,762,845 sequences. These sequences were filtered using Roche’s software with default settings. After filtration, 1,191,866 sequence reads (341.2 megabases, Mb) were obtained with an average length of 286 bp. Sequences were assembled into 65,472 contigs (and 172,108 singletons) with a mean length of 625.9 bp (median = 499 bp; mode = 365 bp). About half of these contigs (32,612) were longer than 500 bp and their distribution by range was the highest for the 200–499 bp length, followed by the 1–199 bp length and finally by the 500–999 bp length (Figure 1A). The average depth coverage per contig was of 4.6 sequences (SD: 11.7; Figure 1B). Reads obtained in this high throughput sequence analysis have been submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under accession number SRA056483.

Figure 1

Length range distribution of pyrosequencing contig reads of the turbot brain-hypophysis-gonad axis at different stages of gonad development. (A) Range distribution of contigs obtained in the 454 FLX Titanium run. (B) Average coverage distribution per nucleotide of the contigs obtained in the 454 FLX Titanium run.

Table 2 Summary statistics of ( S . maximus ) 454-pyrosequencing

Table 3 shows the top 20 longest contigs obtained from the 454 run with their annotation. They ranged from 3,550 bp to 5,012 bp and their average coverage depth per nucleotide ranged between 4.3 and 33.2. Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 3 was the longest contig. Table 4 shows the top 20 contigs with the deepest coverage (253.2–578.7). Although a normalized library was used, most contigs with the deepest coverage corresponded to protein ribosomal genes. However, genes involved in the reproductive system such as the histone deacetylase complex or the epididymal secretory protein, which is highly expressed on the surface of ejaculated spermatozoa [54], were also present.

Table 3 List of the top 20 longest contigs originated from the 454 run of brain-hypophysis-gonad axis tissues of turbot ( S . maximus )
Table 4 List of the top 20 deepest contigs originated from the 454 run of brain-hypophysis-gonad axis tissues of turbot ( S . maximus )

About half of the contigs obtained in the 454 run were successfully annotated and classified into Gene Ontology categories. More precisely, contigs exclusively obtained by the 454 run were functionally classified in the BP (8,390), CC (7,081) and MF (10,026) categories.

Creation of the turbot 3 database

The sequencing strategies used, i.e. traditional Sanger and high throughput 454, yielded a high amount of transcriptomic sequences both from immune and reproductive systems in turbot. With all the information generated, a new Turbot 3 database was created and stored in a web-based portal for exploitation, first by the consortium participating in this project and then publically once the project is finished by the end of 2013. Cap3 software was used to assemble the sequences coming from all Sanger-based libraries (17,626) and the contigs from 454-pyrosequencing (65,472), yielding 52,427 unique sequences (47,134 only-454, 2,904 mixed Sanger-454 and 2,389 only-Sanger), thus reducing redundancy among sequences (Table 1). The number of sequences generated in one single pyrosequencing run (65,472) was almost four times higher than the six libraries sequenced by Sanger together (17,626). When comparing to public turbot resources, our strategy allowed increasing by 34,400 the number of novel sequences identified for the first time in turbot.

Annotation of the turbot 3 database

Nearly half of the sequences 23,661/52,427 (20,630 only-454, 1,969 mixed Sanger-454 and 1,062 only-Sanger) were automatically annotated by AutoFact ( and produced a significant BLAST hit against at least one of the public databases. A Venn diagram showing the number of sequences that matched with some of the commonly used databases is shown in Figure 2A. A total of 14,194 sequences shared significant BLAST hit against all databases including UniRef90, KEGG, PFam and others (SSU, LSU, COG, Smart), while 8,556 contigs shared BLAST-hits against UniRef90, KEGG and other databases and 885 with PFam and other databases. About 2/3 of the contigs (18,031) were successfully classified into Gene Ontology categories: 12,111 according to BP, 8,445 to CC and 14,116 to MF categories (Figure 2B). The number of sequences exclusively assigned to each functional category was 2,417 for BP, 828 for CC and 4,328 for MF.

Figure 2

Venn diagrams showing annotation (A) and functional classification by Gene Ontology terms (B) in the Turbot 3 database. BP: Biological Process, CC: Cellular Component, MF: Molecular Function.

Most significant BLAST-hits were obtained against a small number of species represented in public databases including model fish species (Danio rerio, Tetraodon nigroviridis, Oryzias latipes, Takifugu rubripes and Gasterosteus aculeatus), cultured fish species (Oncorhynchus mykiss and Salmo salar) and two mammalian species (Mus musculus and Homo sapiens) (Figure 3). G. aculeatus was the highest represented species followed by a group including T. rubripes, O. latipes and T. nigroviridis, all these species and turbot belonging to the Acanthopterygii superorder [55].

Figure 3

BLASTx top-hit species distribution of gene annotations in the Turbot 3 database.

Figure 4 summarizes the number of sequences representing the different 2nd level GO terms in the Turbot 3 database. Cellular process (7,676 sequences) and Metabolic process (6,627 sequences) were the most represented categories within BP terms (Figure 4A), but categories related to immune function had also a high representation: Response to stimulus (1,482 sequences), Viral reproduction (612 sequences), Immune system process (176 sequences) and Death (149 sequences). The reproductive system was also represented by the Reproduction (453 sequences) and Reproductive process (448 sequences) categories, and to a lower extent by Growth and Cell proliferation. Cell and Cell parts categories (7,995 sequences each) followed by Organelle (4,006 sequences) were the highest represented within CC terms (Figure 4B). Finally, within MF terms Binding (7,813 sequences) and Catalytic activity (5,523 sequences) were the most represented categories followed by Transporter activity (887) and Structural molecule activity (830) (Figure 4C).

Figure 4

Second level Gene Ontology assignment of sequences in Turbot 3 database. A) Biological process; B) Cellular component and C) Molecular function.

Identification of genes related to the immune response

The knowledge of the immune system of fish has greatly increased recently. However, there are still many fish diseases which produce important losses to industry because still there is no an effective strategy for their control, including vaccines. The immune system of fish is composed of non-specific and specific immune defenses, being the first more important than in higher vertebrates [56, 57]. Examples of innate immunity include anatomic barriers, mechanical removal of pathogens, bacterial antagonism, pattern-recognition receptors, antigen-nonspecific defense compounds, the complement pathway, phagocytosis, and inflammation [58]. In the present study, the main organs of the immune system of fish such as head kidney (equivalent to the bone marrow of mammals), spleen and thymus (often neglected in fish immune transcriptomics) were included. In addition, other organs such as the liver, a multifunctional organ with innate immune functions in mammals [59] and poorly studied in fish, and the pyloric caeca, the target organ of the myxozoan parasite, which also plays a role in immunity [60], were included as well.

Next-generation pyrosequencing has become an important tool for transcriptomic studies, enabling the identification of new immune molecules that are expressed upon activation of the immune response. A remarkable recent example is the study of the liver transcriptome of orange-spotted grouper (Epinephelus coioides) after virus infection [61]. It seems very likely that developments related to fish immunology will have a significant impact for obtaining a new generation of vaccines against diseases. A disadvantage of turbot is that neither the genome nor the complete transcriptome are available yet and, therefore, important information about immunity and stress related genes and their expression is lacking. Many genes were identified previously in turbot using classical Sanger sequencing in response to A. salmonicida and P. dicentrarchi[36], Vibrio harveyi[62] and nodavirus [52]. However, the number of genes related to the immune system in this species remained low. Recently, Pereiro et al. [29] used 454-pyrosequencing after different immune stimulations to provide a rich source of data to improve the knowledge of S. maximus immune transcriptome. Their results revealed a large number of contigs and singletons with potential immune function in turbot and identified many of the proteins involved in the main immune-pathways in humans, showing the potential of pyrosequencing. Although our 454 run was not specifically from immune-related tissues, after combining the Sanger and pyrosequencing data, a significant number of genes associated to essential functions directly or indirectly related to innate and acquired immunity were detected in the Turbot 3 database (2,241 of the 23,661 annotated sequences; see Additional file 1). Most of the immune-related sequences (1,873) were derived exclusively from the 454 run and only 149 and 219 sequences from Sanger or mixed Sanger-454, respectively. We found several novel genes, including components or family members related to acute phase response and inflammation, stress and/or defense response and in the coagulation cascade. Many of the genes shown in the immune pathways presented by Pereiro et al.[29] (complement, Toll-like receptor signaling, B cell receptor signaling, T cell receptor signaling and apoptosis cascade) could be identified, but also some other important immune genes were identified here for the first time in turbot, a selection of which is shown in Table 5. Relevant examples include DFF40 subunit, a substrate for caspase-3, which triggers DNA fragmentation during apoptosis; BCL-XL, an anti-apoptotic protein; TRAF2, which regulates activation of NF-kappa-B and JNK, playing a central role in the regulation of cell survival and apoptosis; TRAF6, which mediates signaling from members of the TNF receptor superfamily as well as the TOLL/IL-1 family; IRAK1, which plays a critical role in initiating innate immune response against foreign pathogens; JNK, involved in cell differentiation and proliferation, neurodegeneration, inflammatory conditions and AP-1-mediated cytokine production; TOLLIP, which is involved in the turnover of IL1R-associated kinase, interleukin-1 receptor (IL1R) trafficking and regulation of the imflammatory signaling; FYN, which participates in the downstream signaling pathways that lead to T-cell differentiation and proliferation following T-cell receptor (TCR) stimulation; NCK, which plays a pivotal role in the T cell receptor (TCR)-induced reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton and the formation of the immunological synapse; DLG1, which is involved in lymphocyte activation; COT, which promotes the production of TNF-alpha and IL-2 during T lymphocyte activation; CD28, involved in T-cell activation; GADS, involved in B and T cell activation; and GRB2, which provides a critical link between cell surface growth factor receptors and the Ras signaling pathway. The obtained data complements and expands the known spectrum of immunity related genes and provides a valuable platform for more detailed analyses of the immune response in fish in general a turbot in particular.

Table 5 Selection of some of the novel relevant immune-related genes identified in the Turbot 3 database

Several immune related pathways were also identified in the Turbot 3 database. Chemokine signaling is an important immune pathway due to the fundamental role of chemokines in providing directional cues for the trafficking of leukocytes to sites of inflammation but also it has been implicated in dendritic cell maturation, macrophage activation, neutrophil degranulation, B cell antibody class switching, and T cell activation. The data infers that chemokines influence both the innate and acquired phase of an immune response to host insults. Thus, the protein richness of this pathway in the Turbot 3 database was described (see Additional file 2). Most members intervening in this pathway were identified showing the usefulness of the Turbot 3 database for gene discovery.

Identification of genes related to reproduction

To date, fish gonad-related ESTs are poorly represented in public databases. A first attempt to identify genes related to gonad development in male and female turbot was carried out by cDNA-AFLP technology and several specific sequences could be identified [63]. However, the amount of information presently available is still scarce and thus a small number of sex-specific sequences have been identified. Here, the use of the 454 FLX Titanium sequencing allowed obtaining a large number of gene sequences (65,472 contigs) and their subsequent assembly and gene annotation led to the identification of a total of 1,410 annotated sequences related to reproductive function. This means that sequences corresponding to many genes of the brain-hypophysis-gonad axis, expressed first during the process of sex differentiation and then during gonadal maturation, have been identified (Additional file 3). Functional annotation terms classified all those sequences in a total of 8,425 GO terms. This is the first time that sex-related genes have been massively identified towards understanding gonad development and maturation in the turbot.

Table 6 shows 20 relevant genes with a well-known function in the reproductive system, most of them identified for the first time in turbot. The annotation, as shown by the low E-values, was reliable for all of them. Some of these are genes involved in testicular development, such as the androgen receptor-alpha (AR), Müllerian inhibiting substance (AMH), SRY-related genes containing a HMG box (SOX), Spermatogenesis associated 13 or steroid 11-β-hydroxylase. AR has been cloned in several cultured fish species like the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) [64] and the European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax)[65]. AR mediates the androgen effects by binding to specific DNA recognition sites and regulating the transcription of many different processes [66]. In fish, AMH expression levels are consistently higher in males than in females during sex differentiation, suggesting that this factor plays an important role in testicular development [67]. The SOX gene family encodes an important group of developmental regulators, involved in sex determination in fish [68, 69] and other key processes such as development of the central nervous system [70]. Furthermore, the important transcription factors SOX6 and the SOX9 were identified.

Table 6 Selection of some of the novel relevant reproductive-related genes identified in the Turbot 3 database

Another group of identified genes in turbot is involved in ovarian development. This is the case of the cytochrome P450 aromatase (CYP19A), Zona pellucida glycoprotein (ZPG) or the Zygote arrest protein. CYP19A is a key enzyme in the hormonal steroidogenic pathway that mediates the conversion of androgens into estrogens [71], with two isoforms with specific regulation and tissue distribution [72, 73] and it has been cloned in several cultured fish species like European sea bass [74]. Higher expression of CYP19A is found in female gonads when compared to male gonads from early development and recently it has been shown that different methylation levels of its promoter are related to temperature during the thermal sensitive period [75]. ZPGs are glycoproteins found in the fish chorion, which mediate species-specific sperm binding [76]. ZPGs are encoded by multiple gene families and here several of them have been identified (ZPG2, 3, 4). The steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (STAR) and similar proteins containing STAR-related lipid transfer (START) are responsible for the synthesis of sex steroids and other hormones like cortisol in response to specific stimuli [77]. Here, we were able to identify two different START genes, START5 and START 7.

Gonadotropins (GtHs) control the complex endocrine system that regulates gonadal growth, sexual development and reproductive function, and are secreted by the hypophysis [78]. Three forms of GnRH in the brain and pituitary of the turbot have been identified so far [79]. One of the main gonadotropins in vertebrates, as well in fish, is the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). Its receptor, FSHR, is found in male and female gonads and although cloned in other cultured fishes such as the sea bass [80], here is it identified for the first time in turbot.

Not only genes expressed in somatic cells but also genes expressed in the germ cell line were present in the Turbot 3 database. VASA plays an important role in germ cell determination and development and is an essential factor for primordial germ cell formation and migration to the germinal ridge [81]. In fish, VASA was first cloned in zebrafish [82] and later in rainbow trout [83] but also in turbot (JX235364).

Table 7 shows the pathways related to reproduction identified in the Turbot 3 database with more than 50% coverage. Here, pathways are ranked based on the number of genes included in the database with respect to the total number of genes present in each pathway: Oocyte meiosis (dre04114), Circadian rhythm (dre04710), mTOR signaling pathway (dre04150), ErB signaling pathway (dre04012), Progesterone-mediated oocyte maturation (dre04914), GnRH signaling pathway (dre04912), Insulin signaling pathway (dre04910), Androgen and estrogen metabolism (dre00150), Steroid biosynthesis (dre00100), Wnt signaling pathway (dre04310), and Notch signaling pathway (dre04330). Additional file 4 shows the Progesterone-mediated oocyte maturation pathway highlighting the presence and absence of proteins in the Turbot 3 database. The exposure to either insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) or the steroid hormone progesterone breaks oocyte meiotic cell division arrest and induces meiosis resumption and therefore the transformation of the oocyte into a mature, fertilizable egg [84]. Oocyte maturation is also dependent on the activation of a cascade of genes, which activate the MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) signaling pathway [85]. The key activity driving meiotic progression is the maturation-promoting factor (MPF ), a heterodimer of CDC2 (cell division cycle 2 kinase) and CYCLIN-B[86]. In fish, the importance of some of the genes involved in the oocyte maturation pathway has been described so far [87]. Here, 79 out of 105 genes belonging to this pathway were found, showing the coverage of the generated Turbot 3 database.

Table 7 Representation of reproductive pathways with more than 50% of coverage in the Turbot 3 database

Overall, our results show that the approach followed was successful since most of the well-known reproduction-related genes found in other species have been also identified in turbot essentially at once.

Genetic markers

An important emerging application of high-throughput 454 sequencing is the identification of molecular markers from genomic DNA. In fact, recent studies have identified 26 polymorphic microsatellite by pyrosequencing in an endangered fish species of China [88] and 21 microsatellites loci from the threatened freshwater Yarra pygmy perch (Nannoperca obscura) [89]. However, few studies have been conducted to search for cDNA-associated microsatellites, like those identified in the Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) [90], despite the potential for targeting candidate genes [91].

Due to their location within genes, EST-SSR markers frequently display a high degree of transferability between related species, thus facilitating comparative genomics strategies with model species. In addition, high sequence coverage in principle allows the assessment of variability in silico, aiding for selection of polymorphic markers. We searched for new microsatellite markers within our sequence database to identify sequences with different repeat motifs. Our search revealed 993 sequences containing 1,237 new SSRs identified from 52,427 sequences, with 394 EST sequences containing at least two SSRs. Of these, 759 showed significant hits in BLAST with an E-value cut-off of ≤ 1,00E-5 and, thus, were annotated. The frequency of EST-SSRs observed in the turbot transcriptome was 1.9%, and the distribution density was 1.48 microsatellites per Mb. SSR motifs were identified using criteria based in a minimum number of repeats for di-, tri-, tetra- or pentanucleotide motifs (see Methods section). Similar to other vertebrate genomes, the most abundant repeat type was AC (20.93%, 259) followed by AAG (15.04%, 186), AGG (10.51%, 130), AGC (9.30%, 115), and AG (6.87%, 85). The frequency of microsatellites was inverted regarding the length of the motif, dinucleotide microsatellites being the commonest ones and pentanucleotides the less abundant (Table 8). In addition, those microsatellites with a lower number of repeats were more frequent than those with a higher number of repeats, the most common class being n = 4 (438 loci: 35.41%). Further, 12.53% of loci contained more than 10 repeat units. All the new microsatellite-containing ESTs showed sufficient flanking sequence length for primer design, and 5,609 polymorphisms of them appeared polymorphic after in silico analysis.

Table 8 Frequency distribution of the new SSRs by motif length in the Turbot 3 database

A total of 7,362 SNPs were detected in 1,040 of the 9,495 contigs using the three filters set in the QualitySNP pipeline [92]. Only clusters with at least 4 EST sequences (2,456) were selected to minimize the detection of SNPs caused by sequencing errors. On average, one SNP per 196 bp was identified, which is a frequency in the order of that estimated in non-model species [93]. The types of detected SNPs according to different criteria are summarized in Table 9. Among them, 2,223 were transitions, 2,404 transversions and 1,578 indels. In addition, the majority of SNPs were detected in contigs involving a large number of sequences, which provides an additional support for their confidence.

Table 9 Summary statistics of SNPs in the Turbot 3 database

The large amount of potential molecular markers found in this study will enable more detailed population and applied genomic studies. Since these new markers are linked to genes, they will be useful as Type I markers for population genomics screening in this species and for comparative mapping and fish evolutionary studies [94].

Pilot microarray and identification of natural antisense transcripts

To date, several custom microarrays have been designed in several non-model fish species. Examples exist in rainbow trout [95] gilthead sea bream [96], European sea bass [97], Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) [98], common carp (Cyprinus carpio) [99] or Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis) [26], but also in the turbot [37]. In the present study, samples from the reproductive and immune tissues were used to characterize their transcriptome using different sequencing strategies and de novo assembly to identify a large number of genes previously unknown in turbot. The assembled data present in the Turbot 3 database was the basis to construct a pilot microarray towards a new gene-enriched updated version. One of the drawbacks of 454 sequencing technology is that it may produce false annotations of genes [100, 101], and since sequencing is not oriented as in cDNA libraries used for Sanger sequencing, it is not possible to know the DNA sense strand of a gene unless it is confidently annotated. To solve these problems, and in order to identify the most reliable oligos for a definitive turbot microarray, a pilot microarray was developed. In this pilot microarray, oligos were designed both in forward and reverse sequence orientation. In addition, several filtration criteria were followed to analyze microarray data (see Methods). This strategy allows, on one hand, to identify the sense strand of the non-annotated sequences, but also to identify false annotation of genes. On the other hand, this procedure also allows studying the frequency of putative natural antisense transcripts (NATs) in turbot transcriptome [97].

The importance of NATs, which can regulate eukaryotic gene expression, has emerged in the last decade [102]. A NAT is a single-stranded RNA sequence complementary to messenger RNA and includes various classes of short RNAs including micro RNAs (miRNAs), promoter-associated transcripts and long non-protein-coding RNAs [103, 104]. The amount of NATs in eukaryotic cells remains unclear. It had been reported that over 20% of human transcripts might form sense–antisense pairs [105], but large-scale cDNA sequencing suggested that antisense transcription is more common than previously thought [106]. Recently, it has been shown that up to 72% of the transcripts had antisense partners in human and mouse transcriptomes [107, 108]. High-throughput sequencing strategies have revealed a plethora of non-protein-coding transcripts from both genic and intergenic regions [40]. Data on miRNAs, one of the short NAT classes, has been already published in rainbow trout [109] and halibut Hippoglussus hippoglossus[110]. Due to their increasing importance, the study of NATs cannot be longer ignored in transcriptome studies.

The functionality of the oligos included in the pilot-microarray was checked by hybridizing the same RNA used for the Sanger and 454 sequencing strategies. To analyze microarray data two filtration criteria were applied (see Methods). Once the first filtration process was completed 37,759 signals in forward and 33,489 in reverse oligos still remained (75%) (Table 10). Then, a second filtration with two additional filtering criteria (threshold intensity <100 and cross-hybridization between oligos) was performed to select the best performing oligo probes. As seen after this additional filtration process (Table 10), among the 94,582 probes there were 53,534 (56.6%) with no signal (24,083 forward and 29,451 reverse). After the two rounds of filtration, a total of 41,048 remaining oligos (43.4%) yielded signal in at least one tissue (brain-hypophysis-gonad or immune tissues) or in both. As a result of this filtration strategy, the remaining oligos were selected to be included in the updated turbot microarray. In the development of a custom microarray for the European sea bass, a similar strategy was followed to study NATs expression [97]. Although a lesser amount of sequences was designed for this purpose (640 sequences), identification of NATs was also achieved [97].

Table 10 Filtration process results for the 47,921 sequences with oligos in forward and reverse orientation

It is remarkable that after the second filtration, 2,976 sequences (6.3%) still showed signal in both strands in both types of tissues (brain-hypophysis-gonad and immune tissues). These double hybridization signals could represent putative NATs found for the first time in the turbot transcriptome. miRNAs, are one of the most relevant short NATs classes and function as regulators of gene expression at the level of translation, with an essential input in developmental processes [111]. Due to their growing importance in regulating gene expression, several miRNA databases have been already created. In Table 11, we show a selection of ten miRNAs from those identified in the Turbot 3 database including their number of reads, which could be considered as a gross indicator of their expression level. To our knowledge, these miRNAs are the first to be identified in turbot. Further work is being carried out on the turbot database for developing a consistent bioinformatic pipeline for miRNA identification, as well as for their validation using a Q-PCR approach.

Table 11 Representative sample of miRNAs found in the Turbot 3 database. miRNAs were identified by Blasting Turbot 3 database sequences against the miRBase


This is the first time that the transcriptome of the reproductive and the immune systems of turbot have been widely explored together. Both systems are essential for the survival of individuals and are of primary importance for commercial aquaculture. This study was designed to fill in the gap of genomic resources in turbot and therefore to improve available turbot sequence databases, specifically in genes related to reproduction. The large amount of generated sequences (52,427 putative transcripts) resulted in one of the most complete available databases for flatfish, with more than half of the resources annotated by both gene and functional category. The detailed and focused sequence assembly and gene annotation strategies allowed the identification of several genes involved in the immune and the reproductive systems, being most of them involved in key functions. A large amount of genetic markers was identified, providing new tools for genomic studies. The performance of an informative pilot microarray was assessed and identification of putative miRNAs was possible. Thus, NGS technologies represent an essential tool to increase exponentially genomic resources in non-model species, opening new insights for our understanding of key biological processes and addressing production bottlenecks in their aquaculture.


Animals were treated according to the Directive 2010/63/UE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for experimentation and other scientific purposes. All experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Santiago de Compostela (Spain).

Sanger sequencing

Experimental design and samplings

The E. scophthalmi infection trial was performed at the facilities of CETGA (Centro Tecnológico Gallego de Acuicultura; NW Spain). Naïve turbot (8484 recipients = R and 8484 controls = C) from a balanced mixture of five unrelated families with known pedigree, hatched and reared at a commercial fish farm were sent to CETGA facilities and acclimated to experimental conditions for 10 days before the beginning of the experiment. R and C fish were kept in separate tanks (7 tanks for each group) in two separated recirculating systems, with constant water temperature (19–20°C) and fed with commercial dried pellets. R fish were infected by oral intubation with intestinal scrapings containing E. scophthalmi stages obtained from infected turbot, for two consecutive days. C fish were maintained under equivalent conditions as R fish, but intubated with PBS instead. More details on this procedure can be found in a previous work [112].

The progression of the infection was monitored by sampling both C and R groups at different times post inoculation (p.i.). The prevalence of infection at each sampling point was obtained by detecting positive fish by either PCR or histology in any of the organs examined. At each sampling point, 14 fish from each group were sized, weighed and euthanized by over-exposure to benzocaine (3-aminobenzoic acid ethyl ester, 100 mg L-1, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). The resulting prevalence of infection was 0, 7.1, 28.6, 85.7 and 92.9% at 4, 7, 14, 25 and 34 days p.i, respectively. No C fish was found to be infected.

Samples of spleen, head kidney, thymus, liver and pyloric caeca were rapidly dissected, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until used for RNA extraction. At each sampling time, samples of each tissue from the different individual fish from each group (C, R) were pooled. The serial times of sampling provided tissues expressing different genes related to immune response from initial until late states of the infection.

RNA isolation, library preparation and sequence analysis

RNA extraction of samples from control and infected fish, cDNA library construction and sequencing were performed as described elsewhere [36]. Briefly, RNA was extracted using TRIZOL Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Poly-A mRNA was isolated using the Dynabeads® mRNA Purification Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The two cDNA libraries (control and infected) were directionally constructed (5EcoRI, 3XhoI), with equal amounts of RNA from each tissue at each sampling time, using the ZAP-cDNA Library Construction Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA), except size fractioning that was performed with the SizeSep 400 Spun Columns (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden). Plasmid DNA was isolated from approximately 4,000 clones from each library using the DirectPrep® 96 Miniprep kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA). Plasmid DNA was sequenced following the ABI Prism BigDye™ Teminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit protocol on an ABI 3100 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). All clones were sequenced from their 3 ends using a standard T7 primer to obtain the highest specific gene sequences for oligo-microarray design. Those clones that suffered a systematic drop on sequencing signal after poly-A tails were sequenced from the 5 end. Basecalling from chromatogram traces was performed by using PHRED [113, 114].

454 pyrosequencing run

Reproductive tissue sampling and RNA extraction

A total of 30 turbot samples were collected from CETGA from a mixture of unrelated genetic families. In order to obtain the widest possible range of expressed transcript sub-sets, tissues were dissected in fish at different stages of gonad development. The number, age and the mean values of biometry (standard length and body weight) for each animal group were the following: undifferentiated animals (n = 5; 90 days post hatch [dph], 5.2 ± 0.6 cm, 2.9 ± 0.9 g); differentiating animals (n = 4; 150 dph, 9.8 ± 1.3 cm, 21.8 ± 9.5 g); male juveniles (n = 4; 400 dph, 20.9 ± 4.2 cm, 195.0 ± 123.0 g); female juveniles (n = 5; 450 dph, 23.4 ± 3.6 cm, 264.1 ± 93.4 g); male broodstock (n = 3; 900 dph, 44.8 ± 3.6 cm, 2,059.0 ± 591.6 g) and female broodstock (n = 3; 900 dph, 47.7 ± 6.4 cm, 2,834.3 ± 1,264.9 g). Brain and hypophysis from broodstock animals were also dissected and rapidly flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. Gonads were fully isolated in adult and juvenile fish and thus gonadal tissue was devoid of any other tissue. However, gonads of sexually differentiating fish contained a bit of attached epithelium. Due to their extremely small size, the isolation of the gonads alone was not feasible and thus samples contained also portions of the surrounding tissues.

RNA was individually extracted by RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantity was determined using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Nanodrop Technologies, US). The RNA integrity number (RIN) was determined in an Agilent BioAnalizer (Agilent Technologies, US). RNA samples with a RIN > 8.1 were further processed for the sequencing run. A pooled sample was generated by mixing 70% of gonads containing equal amounts of RNA from each individual and 30% of equal amount of RNA from broodstock brains and hypophysis tissues.

cDNA library, normalization and 454 FLX Titanium pyrosequencing

Full-length-enriched double stranded cDNA was synthesized from 1.5 μg of pooled total RNA using the MINT cDNA synthesis kit (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and was subsequently purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen USA, Valencia, CA). The amplified cDNA was normalized using the Trimmer kit (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia) to minimize differences in representation of transcripts [115, 116]. The single-stranded cDNA fraction was then amplified twice by sequential PCR reactions according to manufacturer’s protocol. Normalized cDNA was purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen USA, Valencia, CA). Normalized cDNA (5 μg) was used to generate a 454 library. cDNA was fractionated into small, 300 to 800 bp fragments and the specific A and B adaptors were ligated to both the 3 and 5 ends of the fragments and used for purification, amplification, and sequencing steps. Two and a quarter PTP regions were used for the GS-FLX sequencing run using Titanium chemistry. All reagents and protocols were from Roche 454 Life Sciences, USA. 454 data was processed with Roche’s software, using default settings, to obtain fasta and quality files containing the trimmed sequence of all reads [117]. Contigs with at least 100 bp were recovered. Sequences were de novo assembled into contigs by running Mira v3.2.0rc1 in EST mode. Contigs less than 100 bp were filtered out and the rest was blasted against D. rerio RefSeq protein sequences with est2assembly’s script [118] in order to validate the whole process.

Turbot databases

Bioinformatic tools were developed to process all sequencing data obtained from both Sanger and 454 FLX Titanium technologies. The starting point of the current work was the Turbot 1 database, which was reported previously [36]. In order to generate the Turbot 2 database sequences of Turbot 1 database (9,873) were clustered with: 3,043 sequences obtained from the E. scophthalmi trial cDNA libraries, 1,371 genomic sequences from enriched DNA libraries [51] and 3,339 sequences available in public databases [52], using CAP3 software ( (Table 1). The resulting “.ace” file was used to study coverage and construct user-friendly alignment views with Mview [119]. To construct the Turbot 3 database, the primitive sequences of Turbot 2 (17,626) were pooled with the 454 contigs (65,472) and then clustered using CAP3 software. The resulting contigs and singletons were annotated using AutoFact (, BLASTN and BLASTX with databases nr, UniProt, UniRef, COG, KEGG, PFam, LSU and SSU. Results were uploaded to a MySQL database and a portal web was created.

To study the different pathways found in the Turbot 3 database the DAVID web tool was used [120, 121]. After the selection of the pathways of interest, a list of reference genes was downloaded from the NCBI RefSeq database and BLASTed against the Turbot 3 database. A gene was considered present in our database if its reference sequence had a match with an e-value cut off ≤ 1,00E-5 and hit length ≥50. To make the colour pathway diagrams (Additional file 2 and Additional file 4) the KEGG mapper tool was used [122, 123]. Due to the lack of a D. rerio Chemokine signaling pathway in KEGG website the human version was used for Additional file 2. In Additional file 4, the Progesterone-mediated oocyte maturation pathway from D. rerio given by KEGG website is labeled as Xenopus oocyte. This label is kept in the figure.

Microsatellites and SNPs

For SSR and SNP detection, EST sequences were clustered with CAP3 using default parameters and the resulting “.ace” format assembly file was fed into the corresponding programs. The set of unique sequences was searched for microsatellites using the SPUTNIK program ( The minimum repeat number used for this search was six for dinucleotide and four for tri-, tetra- and pentanucleotide microsatellites. Microsatellite-containing ESTs were identified as candidates for marker development if they presented enough flanking sequences on either side of the repeats for primer design. Whenever possible, we selected three putative primers using the Primer3 software (

SNP detection was performed with contigs of at least four sequences using the QualitySNP program ( This program uses three filters for the identification of reliable SNPs (see [92] for details). SNPs that pass filters 1 and 2 are called real SNPs and those passing all filters are called true SNPs. The resulting files were processed with our own custom Perl programs to extract relevant information. The obtained true SNPs were imported into a MySQL database ( A user-friendly web access interface was designed so that contig graphs are clickable and the output visually refined with color-coded nucleotide views ( A graphical interface allowing for SNP database search by alleles, contig depth, and annotation was also established in our on line database. Searchable chromatograms for each of the Sanger sequences making up each contig were also included. It should be emphasized that SNPs detected with the help of bioinformatic pipelines are only putative and they should be technically validated.

To ensure identification of new molecular markers, sequences similar to GenBank deposited sequences were filtered out to avoid identification of already known SSR and SNP sequences, especially the ones previously identified by turbot [18, 19, 48, 51, 94, 124, 125].

Pilot-microarray platform

A custom 2 x 105 K array was printed with turbot sequences from the Turbot 3 database by Agilent Technologies (US). In order to study the orientation of the non-annotated sequences and their possible gene expression, false annotation of genes and identify possible NATs, oligos were designed in both orientations, forward and reverse. Oligo design was done by using Repeat Masker to eliminate low-complexity regions, and then OligoArray 2.1 software to do the design itself [126]. Cross-hybridization between oligos was checked by BLAST searches against the entire Turbot 3 database and oligos with ≥ 3 putative cross-hybridizations were removed. A total number of 96,292 oligos were printed and almost half of the array contained oligos (47,291) also designed with the opposite orientation. This pilot microarray also included all default positive and negative controls defined by the company (1,325 spots).

Microarray hybridization

The same samples of immune tissues used for library construction and Sanger sequencing and those from the brain-pituitary-gonad axis used for 454 sequencing were used for hybridization (in duplicate) with the pilot microarray. A total of four microarrays were used, two for the reproductive system and two for the immune system. Hybridizations were performed at the Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (USC) Functional Genomics Platform by the Agilent Technology Gene Expression Unit using a 1-colour labeling protocol. This method demonstrated very similar performances to the 2-colour protocol [97, 127]. Briefly, 50 ng of total RNA were labelled using the Low Input Quick Amp Labeling Kit, One-Color (Cy3) (Agilent Technologies, USA). cRNA was prepared for overnight hybridization with the corresponding buffers during 17 h at 65°C and washed on the following day. Hybridized slides were scanned using an Agilent G2565B microarray scanner (Agilent Technologies, USA).

Pilot microarray data processing, filtration, and identification of NATs

The hybridization signal was captured and processed using an Agilent scanner (G2565B, Agilent Technologies, USA). The scanner images were segmented with the Agilent Feature Extraction Software (v9.5) using protocol GE1-v5_95. Extended dynamic range implemented in the Agilent software was applied to avoid saturation in the highest intensity range. Agilent feature extraction produced the raw data for further pre-processing. The processed signal (gProcessed-Signal) value was chosen as statistical for the absolute hybridization signal.

The filtration process was made in two steps. First, the features which did not conform with any of the following well established quality criteria were filtered: (1) non-uniform pixel distributed outliers and population replicate outliers according to the default Agilent feature extraction criteria; (2) features whose ratio between processed signal and their error was below 2; (3) spots not differentiated from background signal (as estimated for each spot); (4) features below the limit where the linear relationship between concentration and intensity was lost according to Spike-In information. The numbers of oligos filtered using this first step is shown in Table 10. Second, two additional filtering criteria were applied: (5) only features with intensity ≥ 100 fluorescence units were kept; (6) features likely to present cross-hybridization were filtered. Table 10 shows the numbers of oligos filtered using the complete filtration process.

For miRNA identification in the Turbot 3 database, a BLASTN search against the miRBase v.18 database ( was used. The ten best matches were selected and are depicted in Table 11.

Statistical analyses were carried out with the statistical language R (2.13.1 version). The GOStats Bioconductor package (version 2.18) was used to perform the analysis of GO Terms.


  1. 1.

    Wang N, Wang XL, Sha ZX, Tian YS, Chen SL: Development and characterization of a new marine fish cell line from turbot (Scophthalmus maximus). Fish Physiol Biochem. 2010, 36 (4): 1227-1234. 10.1007/s10695-010-9402-y.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Qi Z, Zhang X-H, Boon N, Bossier P: Probiotics in aquaculture of China - Current state, problems and prospect. Aquaculture. 2009, 290 (1–2): 15-21.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lan J, Zhang XH, Wang Y, Chen J, Han Y: Isolation of an unusual strain of Edwardsiella tarda from turbot and establish a PCR detection technique with the gyrB gene. J Appl Microbiol. 2008, 105 (3): 644-651. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03779.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Magnadottir B: Immunological control of fish diseases. Mar Biotechnol. 2010, 12 (4): 361-379. 10.1007/s10126-010-9279-x.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Vadstein O: The use of immunostimulation in marine larviculture: possibilities and challenges. Aquaculture. 1997, 155 (1–4): 401-417.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Álves E, Faustino MAF, Tome JPC, Neves M, Tome AC, Cavaleiro JAS, Cunha A, Gómes NCM, Almeida A: Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy in aquaculture: photoinactivation studies of vibrio fischeri. PLoS One. 2011, 6 (6): e20970-10.1371/journal.pone.0020970.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Doñate C, Balasch JC, Callol A, Bobe J, Tort L, MacKenzie S: The effects of immunostimulation through dietary manipulation in the rainbow trout; evaluation of mucosal immunity. Mar Biotechnol. 2010, 12 (1): 88-99. 10.1007/s10126-009-9203-4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Pogoda HM, Hammerschmidt M: How to make a teleost adenohypophysis: Molecular pathways of pituitary development in zebrafish. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2009, 312 (1–2): 2-13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Taranger GL, Carrillo M, Schulz RW, Fontaine P, Zanuy S, Felip A, Weltzien F-A, Dufour S, Karlsen O, Norberg B, Andersson E, Hausen T: Control of puberty in farmed fish. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2010, 165 (3): 483-515. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.05.004.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Devauchelle N, Alexandre JC, Lecorre N, Letty Y: Spawing of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) in captivity. Aquaculture. 1988, 69 (1–2): 159-184.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Piferrer F, Guiguen Y: Fish gonadogenesis. Part II: Molecular biology and genomics of sex differentiation. Rev Fish Sci. 2008, 16 (Suppl. 1): 35-55.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Siegfried KR: In search of determinants: gene expression during gonadal sex differentiation. J Fish Biol. 2010, 76 (8): 1879-1902. 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02594.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Penman DJ, Piferrer F: Fish gonadogenesis. Part I: Genetic and environmental mechanisms of sex determination. Rev Fish Sci. 2008, 16 (Suppl. 1): 16-34.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Devlin RH, Nagahama Y: Sex determination and sex differentiation in fish: an overview of genetic, physiological, and environmental influences. Aquaculture. 2002, 208 (3–4): 191-364.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ospina-Álvarez N, Piferrer F: Temperature-dependent sex determination in fish revisited: prevalence, a single sex ratio response pattern, and possible effects of climate change. PLoS One. 2008, 3 (7): e2837-10.1371/journal.pone.0002837.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Cal RM, Vidal S, Gómez C, Álvarez-Blázquez B, Martínez P, Piferrer F: Growth and gonadal development in diploid and triploid turbot (Scophthalmus maximus). Aquaculture. 2006, 251 (1): 99-108. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.05.010.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Haffray P, Lebegue E, Jeu S, Guennoc M, Guiguen Y, Baroiller JF, Fostier A: Genetic determination and temperature effects on turbot Scophthalmus maximus sex differentiation: An investigation using steroid sex-inverted males and females. Aquaculture. 2009, 294 (1–2): 30-36.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bouza C, Hermida M, Millán A, Vilas R, Vera M, Fernández C, Calaza M, Pardo BG, Martínez P: Characterization of EST-derived microsatellites for gene mapping and evolutionary genomics in turbot. Anim Genet. 2008, 39 (6): 666-670. 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01784.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Bouza C, Hermida M, Pardo BG, Fernández C, Fortes GG, Castro J, Sánchez L, Presa P, Pérez M, Sanjuan A, de Carlos A, Álvarez-Dios A, Ezcurra S, Cal M, Piferrer P, Martínez P: A microsatellite genetic map of the turbot (Scophthalmus maximus). Genetics. 2007, 177 (4): 2457-2467. 10.1534/genetics.107.075416.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Bouza C, Hermida M, Pardo BG, Vera M, Fernández C, De La Herran R, Navajas-Pérez R, Álvarez-Dios JA, Gómez-Tato A, Martínez P: An Expressed Sequence Tag (EST)-enriched genetic map of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus): a useful framework for comparative genomics across model and farmed teleosts. BMC Genet. 2012, 13: 54-

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Martínez P, Hermida M, Pardo BG, Fernández C, Castro J, Cal RM, Álvarez-Dios JA, Gómez-Tato A, Bouza C: Centromere-linkage in the turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) through half-tetrad analysis in diploid meiogynogenetics. Aquaculture. 2008, 280 (1–4): 81-88.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Martínez P, Bouza C, Hermida M, Fernández J, Toro MA, Vera M, Pardo BG, Millán A, Fernández C, Vilas R, Viñas A, Sánchez L, Felip A, Piferrer F, Ferreiro I, Cableiro S: Identification of the major Sex-determining region of turbot (scophthalmus maximus). Genetics. 2009, 183 (4): 1443-1452. 10.1534/genetics.109.107979.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Viñas A, Taboada X, Vale L, Robledo D, Hermida M, Vera M, Martínez P: Mapping of DNA Sex-specific markers and genes related to Sex differentiation in turbot (scophthalmus maximus). 2012, Mar: Biotechnol

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Casas L, Sánchez L, Orban L: Sex-associated DNA markers from turbot. Mar Biol Res. 2011, 7 (4): 378-387. 10.1080/17451000.2010.515226.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Cerdá J, Douglas SE, Knickle LC, Kimball J, Reith ME: Comprehensive EST analysis of Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus), a commercially relevant aquaculture species. BMC Genomics. 2007, 8: 1045-

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Cerdá J, Douglas S, Reith M: Genomic resources for flatfish research and their applications. J Fish Biol. 2010, 77 (5): 1045-1070. 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02695.x.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Manchado M, Infante C, Asensio E, Canavate JP, Douglas SE: Comparative sequence analysis of the complete set of 40S ribosomal proteins in the Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis K.) and Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus L.) (Teleostei: Pleuronectiformes): Phylogeny and tissue-specific and development-specific expression. BMC Evol Biol. 2007, 7: 107-10.1186/1471-2148-7-107.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Forne I, Castellana B, Marín-Juez R, Cerdà J, Abian J, Planas JV: Transcriptional and proteomic profiling of flatfish (Solea senegalensis) spermatogenesis. Proteomics. 2011, 11 (11): 2195-2211. 10.1002/pmic.201000296.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Pereiro P, Balseiro P, Romero A, Dios S, Forn-Cuni G, Fusté B, Planas JV, Beltran S, Novoa B, Figueras A: High-throughput sequence analysis of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) transcriptome using 454-pyrosequencing for the discovery of antiviral immune genes. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (5): e35369-10.1371/journal.pone.0035369.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Iglesias R, Parama A, Álvarez MF, Leiro J, Fernández J, Sammartín ML: Philasterides dicentrarchi (Ciliophora, Scuticociliatida) as the causative agent of scuticociliatosis in farmed turbot Scophthalmus maximus in Galicia (NW Spain). Dis Aquat Org. 2001, 46 (1): 47-55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Quiroga MI, Redondo MJ, Sitjà-Bobadilla A, Palenzuela O, Riaza A, Macias A, Vázquez S, Pérez A, Nieto JM, Álvarez-Pellitero P: Risk factors associated with Enteromyxum scophthalmi (Myxozoa) infection in cultured turbot, Scophthalmus maximus (L.). Parasitology. 2006, 133: 433-442. 10.1017/S0031182006000515.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Toranzo AE, Magarinos B, Romalde JL: A review of the main bacterial fish diseases in mariculture systems. Aquaculture. 2005, 246 (1–4): 37-61.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Farto R, Milton DL, Bermúdez MB, Nieto TP: Colonization of turbot tissues by virulent and avirulent Aeromonas salmonicida subsp salmonicida strains during infection. Dis Aquat Org. 2011, 95 (2): 167-173. 10.3354/dao02342.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Álvarez-Pellitero P, Palenzuela O, Padrós F, Sitjà-Bobadilla A, Riaza A, Silva R, Aran J: Histophagous scuticociliatids (Ciliophora) parasitizing turbot Scophthalmus maximus: morphology, in vitro culture and virulence. Folia Parasitol. 2004, 51 (2–3): 177-187.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Branson E, Riaza A, Álvarez-Pellitero P: Myxosporean infection causing intestinal disease in farmed turbot, Scophthalmus maximus (L.), (Teleostei: Scophthalmidae). J Fish Dis. 1999, 22 (5): 395-399. 10.1046/j.1365-2761.1999.00193.x.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Pardo BG, Fernández C, Millán A, Bouza C, Vázquez-López A, Vera M, Álvarez-Dios JA, Calaza M, Gómez-Tato A, Vázquez M, Cabaleiro S, Magarinos B, Lemos M, Leiro J, Martínez P: Expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from immune tissues of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) challenged with pathogens. BMC Vet Res. 2008, 4: 12-10.1186/1746-6148-4-12.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Millán A, Gómez-Tato A, Fernández C, Pardo BG, Álvarez-Dios JA, Calaza M, Bouza C, Vázquez M, Cabaleiro S, Martínez P: Design and performance of a turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) oligo-microarray based on ESTs from immune tissues. Mar Biotechnol. 2010, 12 (4): 452-465. 10.1007/s10126-009-9231-0.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Millán A, Gómez-Tato A, Pardo BG, Fernández C, Bouza C, Vera M, Álvarez-Dios JA, Cabaleiro S, Lamas J, Lemos ML, Martínez P: Gene expression profiles of the spleen, liver, and head kidney in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) along the infection process with Aeromonas salmonicida using an immune-enriched oligo-microarray. Mar Biotechnol. 2011, 13 (6): 1099-1114. 10.1007/s10126-011-9374-7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Pardo BG, Millán A, Gómez-Tato A, Fernández C, Bouza C, Álvarez-Dios JA, Cabaleiro S, Lamas J, Leiro JM, Martínez P: Gene expression profiles of spleen, liver, and head kidney in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) along the infection process with Philasterides dicentrarchi using an immune-enriched oligo-microarray. Mar Biotechnol. 2012, 14 (5): 570-583. 10.1007/s10126-012-9440-9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Carvalho DC, Beheregaray LB: Rapid development of microsatellites for the endangered Neotropical catfish Conorhynchus conirostris using a modest amount of 454 shot-gun pyrosequencing. Conserv Genet Resour. 2011, 3 (2): 373-375. 10.1007/s12686-010-9365-4.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Fraser BA, Weadick CJ, Janowitz I, Rodd FH, Hughes KA: Sequencing and characterization of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) transcriptome. BMC Genomics. 2011, 12: 14-10.1186/1471-2164-12-14.

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Rhee JS, Kim BM, Kim RO, Choi BS, Choi IY, Lee YM, Lee JS: Analysis of expressed sequence tags from the liver and ovary of the euryhaline hermaphroditic fish, Kryptolebias marmoratus. Comp Biochem Phys D. 2011, 6 (3): 244-255.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    de la Serrana CD, Estevez A, Andree K, Johnston IA: Fast skeletal muscle transcriptome of the Gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) determined by next generation sequencing. BMC Genomics. 2012, 13 (1): 181-10.1186/1471-2164-13-181.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Hale MC, McCormick CR, Jackson JR, DeWoody JA: Next-generation pyrosequencing of gonad transcriptomes in the polyploid lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens): the relative merits of normalization and rarefaction in gene discovery. BMC Genomics. 2009, 10: 30-36. 10.1186/1471-2164-10-30.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Hale MC, Jackson JR, DeWoody JA: Discovery and evaluation of candidate sex-determining genes and xenobiotics in the gonads of lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens). Genetica. 2010, 138 (7): 745-756. 10.1007/s10709-010-9455-y.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Liu ZJ, Cordes JF: DNA marker technologies and their applications in aquaculture genetics. Aquaculture. 2004, 242 (1–4): 735-736.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Poompuang S, Hallerman EM: Toward detection of quantitative trait loci and marker-assisted selection in fish. Rev Fish Sci. 1997, 5: 253-277. 10.1080/10641269709388600.

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Navajas-Pérez R, Robles F, Molina-Luzón MJ, De La Herran R, Álvarez-Dios JA, Pardo BG, Vera M, Bouza C, Martínez P: Exploitation of a turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.) immune-related expressed sequence tag (EST) database for microsatellite screening and validation. Mol Ecol Resour. 2012, 12 (4): 706-716. 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03126.x.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Rodríguez-Ramilo ST, Toro MA, Bouza C, Hermida M, Pardo BG, Cabaleiro S, Martínez P, Fernández J: QTL detection for Aeromonas salmonicida resistance related traits in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus). BMC Genomics. 2011, 12: 541-10.1186/1471-2164-12-541.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Rodríguez-Ramilo ST, Fernández J, Toro MA, Bouza C, Hermida M, Fernández C, Pardo BG, Cabaleiro S, Martínez P: Uncovering QTL for resistance and survival time to Philasterides dicentrarchi in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus). Anim Genet. 2013, 44: 149-157. 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2012.02385.x.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Pardo BG, Hermida M, Fernandez C, Bouza C, Perez M, Llavona A, Sánchez L, Martínez P: A set of highly polymorphic microsatellites useful for kinship and population analysis in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.). Aquacult Res. 2006, 37 (15): 1578-1582. 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2006.01600.x.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Park KC, Osborne JA, Montes A, Dios S, Nerland AH, Novoa B, Figueras A, Brown LL, Johnson SC: Immunological responses of turbot (Psetta maxima) to nodavirus infection or polyriboinosinic polyribocytidylic acid (pIC) stimulation, using expressed sequence tags (ESTs) analysis and cDNA microarrays. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2009, 26 (1): 91-108. 10.1016/j.fsi.2008.03.010.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Lo J, Lee S, Xu M, Liu F, Ruan H, Eun A, He Y, Ma W, Wang W, Wen Z, Peng J: 15,000 Unique zebrafish EST clusters and their future use in microarray for profiling gene expression patterns during embryogenesis. Genome Res. 2003, 13: 455-466. 10.1101/gr.885403.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Kirchhoff C: Molecular characterization of epididymal proteins. Rev Reprod. 1998, 3 (2): 86-95. 10.1530/ror.0.0030086.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Nelson JS: Fishes of the world. 2006, New Jersei, 4

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Watts M, Munday BL, Burke CM: Immune responses of teleost fish. Aust Vet J. 2001, 79 (89): 570-574.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Álvarez-Pellitero P: Fish immunity and parasite infections: from innate immunity to immunoprophylactic prospects. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2008, 126 (3–4): 171-198.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Ellis AE: Innate host defense mechanisms of fish against viruses and bacteria. Dev Comp Immunol. 2001, 25 (8–9): 827-839.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Gao B, Jeong W-I, Tian Z: Liver: An organ with predominant innate immunity. Hepatology. 2008, 47 (2): 729-736.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Cain K, Swan C: Barrier function and immunology. Fish Physiol. 2010, 30: 111-134.

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Huang YH, Huang XH, Yan Y, Cai J, Ouyang ZL, Cui HC, Wang PR, Qin QW: Transcriptome analysis of orange-spotted grouper (Epinephelus coioides) spleen in response to Singapore grouper iridovirus. BMC Genomics. 2011, 12: 556-10.1186/1471-2164-12-556.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Wang C, Zhang XH, Jia A, Chen J, Austin B: Identification of immune-related genes from kidney and spleen of turbot, Psetta maxima (L.), by suppression subtractive hybridization following challenge with Vibrio harveyi. J Fish Dis. 2008, 31 (7): 505-514. 10.1111/j.1365-2761.2008.00914.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Taboada X, Robledo D, Del Palacio L, Rodeiro A, Felip A, Martínez P, Viñas A: Comparative expression analysis in mature gonads, liver and brain of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) by cDNA-AFLPS. Gene. 2012, 492 (1): 250-261. 10.1016/j.gene.2011.10.020.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Takeo J, Yamashita S: Two distinct isoforms of cDNA encoding rainbow trout androgen receptors. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274 (9): 5674-5680. 10.1074/jbc.274.9.5674.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Blázquez M, Piferrer F: Sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) androgen receptor: cDNA cloning, tissue-specific expression, and mRNA levels during early development and sex differentiation. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2005, 237 (1–2): 37-48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Hunter GA, Donaldson EM: Hormonal sex control and its application to fish culture. Fish Physiology. 1983, 9: 223-303.

    Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Wu G-C, Chiu P-C, Lyu Y-S, Chang C-F: The expression of amh and amhr2 is associated with the development of gonadal tissue and sex change in the Protandrous black porgy, Acanthopagrus schlegeli. Biol Reprod. 2010, 83 (3): 443-453. 10.1095/biolreprod.110.084681.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Navarro-Martín L, Galay-Burgos M, Sweeney G, Piferrer F: Different sox17 transcripts during sex differentiation in sea bass. Dicentrarchus labrax Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2009, 160: 3-11.

    Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Nakamura S, Watakabe I, Nishimura T, Toyoda A, Taniguchi Y, Tanaka M: Analysis of medaka sox9 orthologue reveals a conserved role in germ cell maintenance. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (1): e29982-10.1371/journal.pone.0029982.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Bowles J, Schepers G, Koopman P: Phylogeny of the SOX family of developmental transcription factors based on sequence and structural indicators. Dev Biol. 2000, 227 (2): 239-255. 10.1006/dbio.2000.9883.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Guiguen Y, Fostier A, Piferrer F, Chang CF: Ovarian aromatase and estrogens: A pivotal role for gonadal sex differentiation and sex change in fish. Gen Comp Endocr. 2010, 165 (3): 352-366. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.03.002.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Piferrer F, Blázquez M: Aromatase distribution and regulation in fish. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2005, 31: 215-226. 10.1007/s10695-006-0027-0.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Blázquez M, Piferrer F: Cloning, sequence analysis, tissue distribution, and sex-specific expression of the neural form of P450 aromatase in juvenile sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2004, 219 (1–2): 83-94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Dalla Valle L, Lunardi L, Belvedere P: European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.) cytochrome P450arom: cDNA cloning, expression and genomic organization. J Steroid Biochem. 2002, 80 (1): 25-34. 10.1016/S0960-0760(01)00170-4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Navarro-Martín L, Viñas J, Ribas L, Díaz N, Gutiérrez A, Di Croce L, Piferrer F: DNA methylation of the gonadal aromatase (cyp19a) promoter is involved in temperature-dependent sex ratio shifts in the European sea bass. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7 (12): e1002447-10.1371/journal.pgen.1002447.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Liu XJ, Wang H, Gong ZY: Tandem-repeated zebrafish zp3 genes possess oocyte-specific promoters and are insensitive to estrogen induction. Biol Reprod. 2006, 74 (6): 1016-1025. 10.1095/biolreprod.105.049403.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Miller WL: Steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR), a novel mitochondrial cholesterol transporter. BBA-Mol Cell Biol L. 2007, 1771 (6): 663-676.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Levavi-Sivan B, Bogerd J, Mananos EL, Gomez A, Lareyre JJ: Perspectives on fish gonadotropins and their receptors. Gen Comp Endocr. 2010, 165 (3): 412-437. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.07.019.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Andersson E, Fjelldal PG, Klenke U, Vikingstad E, Taranger GL, Zohar Y, Stefansson SO: Three forms of GnRH in the brain and pituitary of the turbot, Scophthalmus maximus: immunological characterization and seasonal variation. Comp Biochem PhysB. 2001, 129 (2–3): 551-558.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Rocha A, Gómez A, Carrillo M: Cloning of a gonadal follicle stimulating hormone receptor cDNA from the European sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2003, 28 (1–4): 359-360.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Ikenishi K, Tanaka TS: Involvement of the protein of Xenopus vasa homolog (Xenopus vasa-like gene 1, XVLG1) in the differentiation of primordial germ cells. Dev Growth Differ. 1997, 39 (5): 625-633. 10.1046/j.1440-169X.1997.t01-4-00010.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Olsen LC, Aasland R, Fjose A: A vasa-like gene in zebrafish identifies putative primordial germ cells. Mech Develop. 1997, 66 (1–2): 95-105.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Yoshizaki G, Sakatani S, Tominaga H, Takeuchi T: Cloning and characterization of a vasa-like gene in rainbow trout and its expression in the germ cell lineage. Mol Reprod Dev. 2000, 55 (4): 364-371. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(200004)55:4<364::AID-MRD2>3.0.CO;2-8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Tripathi A, Kumar KVP, Chaube SK: Meiotic Cell Cycle Arrest in Mammalian Oocytes. J Cell Physiol. 2010, 223 (3): 592-600.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Bhattacharya S, Basu D, Ak N, Priyadarshini A: Molecular mechanism of oocyte maturation. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2007, 63: 45-55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Aegerter S, Jalabert B, Bobe J: Messenger RNA stockpile of cyclin B, insulin-like growth factor I, insulin-like growth factor II, insulin-like growth factor receptor Ib, and p53 in the rainbow trout oocyte in relation with developmental competence. Mol Reprod Dev. 2004, 67 (2): 127-135. 10.1002/mrd.10384.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Nagahama Y, Yamashita M: Regulation of oocyte maturation in fish. Dev Growth Differ. 2008, 50: S195-S219.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Wang JJ, Yu XM, Zhao K, Zhang YG, Tong JG, Peng ZG: Microsatellite development for an endangered bream Megalobrama pellegrini (Teleostei, Cyprinidae) using 454 sequencing. I J Mol Sci. 2012, 13 (3): 3009-3021.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Carvalho DC, Rodríguez-Zarate CJ, Hammer MP, Beheregaray LB: Development of 21 microsatellite markers for the threatened Yarra pygmy perch (Nannoperca obscura) through 454 shot-gun pyrosequencing. Conserv Genet Resour. 2011, 3 (4): 601-604. 10.1007/s12686-011-9413-8.

    Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Teacher AGF, Kahkonen K, Merila J: Development of 61 new transcriptome-derived microsatellites for the Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus). Conserv Genet Resour. 2012, 4 (1): 71-74. 10.1007/s12686-011-9477-5.

    Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Hoffman JI, Nichols HJ: A novel approach for mining polymorphic microsatellite markers in silico. PLoS One. 2011, 6 (8): e23283-10.1371/journal.pone.0023283.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Tang J, Vosman B, Voorrips RE, van der Linden CG, Leunissen JAM: QualitySNP: a pipeline for detecting single nucleotide polymorphisms and insertions/deletions in EST data from diploid and polyploid species. BMC Bioinforma. 2006, 7: 438-10.1186/1471-2105-7-438.

    Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Brumfield RT, Beerli P, Nickerson DA, Edwards SV: The utility of single nucleotide polymorphisms in inferences of population history. Trends Ecol Evol. 2003, 18 (5): 249-256. 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00018-1.

    Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Vilas R, Bouza C, Vera M, Millán A, Martínez P: Variation in anonymous and EST-microsatellites suggests adaptive population divergence in turbot. Mar Ecol Progr Ser. 2010, 420: 231-239.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Krasnov A, Koskinen H, Pehkonen P, Rexroad CE, Afanasyev S, Molsa H: Gene expression in the brain and kidney of rainbow trout in response to handling stress. BMC Genomics. 2005, 6: 3-10.1186/1471-2164-6-3.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Davey GC, Calduch-Giner JA, Houeix B, Talbot A, Sitjà-Bobadilla A, Prunet P, Pérez-Sánchez J, Cairns MT: Molecular profiling of the gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.) response to chronic exposure to the myxosporean parasite Enteromyxum leei. Mol Immunol. 2011, 48 (15–16): 2102-2112.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Ferraresso S, Milan M, Pellizzari C, Vitulo N, Reinhardt R, Canario AVM, Patarnello T, Bargelloni L: Development of an oligo DNA microarray for the European sea bass and its application to expression profiling of jaw deformity. BMC Genomics. 2010, 11: 354-10.1186/1471-2164-11-354.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Krasnov A, Timmerhaus G, Afanasyev S, Jorgensen SM: Development and assessment of oligonucleotide microarrays for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Comp Biochem Physiol D. 2011, 6 (1): 31-38.

    Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Xu J, Huang W, Zhong C, Luo D, Li S, Zhu Z, Hu W: Defining global gene expression changes of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis in female sGnRH-antisense transgenic common carp (Cyprinus carpio). PLoS One. 2011, 6 (6): e21057-10.1371/journal.pone.0021057.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Nielsen R, Paul JS, Albrechtsen A, Song YS: Genotype and SNP calling from next-generation sequencing data. Nature Rev Genet. 2011, 12 (6): 443-451. 10.1038/nrg2986.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    McPherson JD: Next-generation gap. Nat Methods. 2009, 6 (11): S2-S5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Mattick JS: Non-coding RNAs: the architects of eukaryotic complexity. EMBO Rep. 2001, 2 (11): 986-991. 10.1093/embo-reports/kve230.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Mercer TR, Dinger ME, Mattick JS: Long non-coding RNAs: insights into functions. Nature Rev Genet. 2009, 10 (3): 155-159. 10.1038/nrg2521.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Carthew RW, Sontheimer EJ: Origins and Mechanisms of miRNAs and siRNAs. Cell. 2009, 136 (4): 642-655. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.035.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Chen JJ, Sun M, Kent WJ, Huang XQ, Xie HQ, Wang WQ, Zhou GL, Shi RZ, Rowley JD: Over 20% of human transcripts might form sense-antisense pairs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32 (16): 4812-4820. 10.1093/nar/gkh818.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Carninci P, Kasukawa T, Katayama S, Gough J, Frith MC, Maeda N, Oyama R, Ravasi T, Lenhard B, Wells C, Kodzius R, Shimokawa K, Bajic VB, Brenner SE, Batalov S, Forrest ARR, Zavolan M, Davis MJ, Wilming LG, Aidinis V, Allen JE, Ambesi-Impiombato X, Apweiler R, Aturaliya RN, Bailey TL, Bansal M, Baxter L, Beisel KW, Bersano T, Bono H, et al: The transcriptional landscape of the mammalian genome. Science. 2005, 309 (5740): 1559-1563.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Beiter T, Reich E, Williams RW, Simon P: Antisense transcription: A critical look in both directions. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009, 66 (1): 94-112. 10.1007/s00018-008-8381-y.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Werner A, Sayer JA: Naturally occurring antisense RNA: function and mechanisms of action. Curr Opin Nephro Hypertens. 2009, 18 (4): 343-349. 10.1097/MNH.0b013e32832cb982.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Salem M, Xiao CD, Womack J, Rexroad CE, Yao JB: A microRNA repertoire for functional genome research in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Mar Biotechnol. 2010, 12 (4): 410-429. 10.1007/s10126-009-9232-z.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Bizuayehu TT, Lanes CFC, Furmanek T, Karlsen BO, Fernandes JMO, Johansen SD, Babiak I: Differential expression patterns of conserved miRNAs and isomiRs during Atlantic halibut development. BMC Genomics. 2012, 13: 11-10.1186/1471-2164-13-11.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Werner A, Swan D: What are natural antisense transcripts good for?. Biochem Soc Trans. 2010, 38: 1144-1149. 10.1042/BST0381144.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Redondo MJ, Palenzuela O, Riaza A, Macias A, Álvarez-Pellitero P: Experimental transmission of Enteromyxum scophthalmi (Myxozoa), an enteric parasite of turbot Scophthalmus maximus. J Parasitol. 2002, 88 (3): 482-488.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Ewing B, Green P: Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 1998, 8 (3): 186-194.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P: Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 1998, 8 (3): 175-185.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Shagin DA, Rebrikov DV, Kozhemyako VB, Altshuler IM, Shcheglov AS, Zhulidov PA, Bogdanova EA, Staroverov DB, Rasskazov VA, Lukyanov S: A novel method for SNP detection using a new duplex-specific nuclease from crab hepatopancreas. Genome Res. 2002, 12 (12): 1935-1942. 10.1101/gr.547002.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Zhulidov PA, Bogdanova EA, Shcheglov AS, Vagner LL, Khaspekov GL, Kozhemyako VB, Matz MV, Meleshkevitch E, Moroz LL, Lukyanov SA, Shagin D: Simple cDNA normalization using kamchatka crab duplex-specific nuclease. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32 (3): 15-

    Google Scholar 

  117. 117.,

  118. 118.

    Papanicolaou A, Stierli R, Ffrench-Constant RH, Heckel DG: Next generation transcriptomes for next generation genomes using est2assembly. BMC Bioinforma. 2009, 10: 16-10.1186/1471-2105-10-16.

    Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Brown NP, Leroy C, Sander C: MView: a web-compatible database search or multiple alignment viewer. Bioinformatics. 1998, 14 (4): 380-381. 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.4.380.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA: Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009, 4 (1): 44-57.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA: Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37 (1): 1-13. 10.1093/nar/gkn923.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Kanehisa M, Goto S: KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28 (1): 27-30. 10.1093/nar/28.1.27.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Kanehisa M, Goto S, Sato Y, Furumichi M, Tanabe M: KEGG for integration and interpretation of large-scale molecular datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40: D109-D114. 10.1093/nar/gkr988.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Ruan XH, Wang WJ, Kong J, Hu JJ: Isolation and analysis of microsatellites in the genome of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.). Afr J Biotechnol. 2011, 10 (4): 507-518.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Pardo GB, Casas L, Fortes GG, Bouza C, Martínez P, Clark MS, Sánchez L: New microsatellite markers in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) derived from an enriched genomic library and sequence databases. Molec Ecol Notes. 2005, 5 (1): 62-64. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00834.x.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Rouillard JM, Zuker M, Gulari E: OligoArray 2.0: design of oligonucleotide probes for DNA microarrays using a thermodynamic approach. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31 (12): 3057-3062. 10.1093/nar/gkg426.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Patterson TA, Lobenhofer EK, Fulmer-Smentek SB, Collins PJ, Chu T-M, Bao W, Fang H, Kawasaki ES, Hager J, Tikhonova IR, Walker SJ, Zhang L, Hurban P, de Longueville F, Fuscoe JC, Tong W, Shi L, Wolfinger RR: Performance comparison of one-color and two-color platforms within the MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project. Nat Biotechnol. 2006, 24 (9): 1140-1150. 10.1038/nbt1242.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank the CCiT-UB staff for their collaboration in sequencing turbot RNA samples. We also thank the Cluster of Aquaculture of Galicia (CETGA) for providing the facilities for the infection trial and doing the sampling and collection of organs for the cDNA library and 454 run. The current work was granted by the Spanish Government thanks to a Consolider Project (Project Aquagenomics, ref. CDS2007-0002) and to projects AGL2006-13158-C03 and AGL2009-13282-C01 and C02. LR was supported by an Aquagenomics postdoctoral contract and BGP was supported by an Isidro Parga Pondal research fellowship from the Xunta de Galicia (Spain). Authors want to thank M.J. Redondo (IATS), María Vázquez (CETGA) and Ana Paula Losada (USC) for their assistance with the infection trial.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesc Piferrer.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

FP and PM lead and supervised the study. E. scophthalmi experimental design, parasite diagnosis and collection of immune-related tissues were done by MQ and ASB, and cDNA library constructions and Sanger sequencing data by BGP. Gonad sampling design and RNA extraction was performed by FP and LR, respectively. 454 sequencing run data was obtained from the Centres Científic i Tecnològics de la Universitat de Barcelona (CCiT-UB) by JVP. JAD compiled the Turbot 2 and Turbot 3 databases. CF designed the oligo microarray and AGT processed microarray results. Microarray hybridizations were performed by BGP. The paper was mainly written by LR, also contributed by BGP, JAD, AGT, JVP, ASB, and FP, and revised and edited by FP and PM. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Additional file 1: List of all the immune-related genes found in the Turbot 3 database.(XLSX 128 KB)

Chemokine signaling pathway representing the present (in blue) and absent genes (without color) in the Turbot 3 database.

Additional file 2: ADCY 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9: adenylate cyclase; ADRBK 1, 2: adrenergic, beta receptor kinase; AKT 1, 2, 3: v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog; RHOA: ras homolog family member A; ARRB 1, 2: arrestin beta; BRAF: v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog; CDC42: cell division cycle 42 (GTP binding protein); CCR4: chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 4; CRK: v-crk sarcoma virus CT10 oncogene homolog; DOCK2: dedicator of cytokinesis 2; PTK2B: PTK2B protein tyrosine kinase 2 beta; FGR: Gardner-Rasheed feline sarcoma viral (v-fgr) oncogene homolog; FOXO3: forkhead box O3; GNAI 1, 2, 3: guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein) alpha inhibiting activity polypeptide; GN B1, B2, B3, G3, G10: guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein) beta polypeptide; CXCR 1, 2, 3, 4: chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 3; GRK 4, 5, 6: G protein-coupled receptor kinase; GRB2: growth factor receptor-bound protein 2; GSK 3A, 3B: glycogen synthase kinase 3 alpha; HCK: hemopoietic cell kinase; HRAS: v-Ha-ras Harvey rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog; IKBK B, G: inhibitor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells kinase; IL8: interleukin 8; JAK2: Janus kinase 2; KRAS: v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog; LYN: v-yes-1 Yamaguchi sarcoma viral related oncogene homolog; NRAS: neuroblastoma RAS viral (v-ras) oncogene homolog; PAK1: p21 protein (Cdc42/Rac)-activated kinase 1; PF4: platelet factor 4; PIK3CA3R 1, 2, 3, 5: phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit alpha; PLCB 1, 2, 3, 4: phospholipase C beta; PRKAC A, B, G: protein kinase, cAMP-dependent catalytic; PRKC B, D, Z: protein kinase C; MAPK 1, K3: mitogen-activated protein kinase; PRKX: protein kinase, X-linked; PXN: paxillin; RAC 1, 2: ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate; RAF1: v-raf-1 murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog 1; RAP 1A 1B: member of RAS oncogene family; RELA: v-rel reticuloendotheliosis viral oncogene homolog A; SOS1: son of seven less homolog 1; SRC: v-src sarcoma (Schmidt-Ruppin A-2) viral oncogene homolog; STAT 1, 3, 5B: signal transducer and activator of transcription, 91 kDa; VAV1: vav 1 guanine nucleotide exchange factor; WAS L: Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (like); ROCK2: Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase 2; BCAR1: breast cancer anti-estrogen resistance 1; ELMO1: engulfment and cell motility 1; RASGRP2: RAS guanyl releasing protein 2 (calcium and DAG-regulated); GNB 4, 5: guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein) beta; SHC2: SHC (Src homology 2 domain containing) transforming protein 2; GNG13: guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein) gamma 13; PARD3: par-3 partitioning defective 3 homolog; PREX1:phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate-dependent Rac exchange factor 1. (PPTX 97 KB)

Additional file 3: List of all the reproduction-related genes found in the Turbot 3 database.(XLSX 88 KB)

Progesterone-mediated oocyte maturation pathway representing the present (in blue) and absent genes (without color) in the Turbot 3 database.

Additional file 4: CDC 16, 23, 25, 26, 27: cell division cycle; HSP90 AA1.1, AA1.2, AB1: heat shock protein 90 alpha (cytosolic); MAPK 1B, 3, 8A, 8B, 9, 10, 11, 12A, 12B, 13, 14A, 14B: mitogen-activated protein kinase; ZORBA: Orb/CPEB-related RNA-binding protein; RAF 1A, 1B: v-raf-1 murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog; CCN A1, B1, B2, B3: cyclin; CDK 1, 2: cyclin-dependent kinase; IGF1R A, B: insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor; PLK1: polo-like kinase 1; ANAPC 2, 5, 11: anaphase promoting complex subunit; GNA I1, IA, I2, 2 L: guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein) alpha inhibiting activity; RPS6K A1,A2, A3A, AL: ribosomal protein S6 kinase like; AKT 2, 2 L, 3A: v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog; FZR1: fizzy/cell division cycle 20 related 1; PRKAC AA, BA, AB, BB, CB: protein kinase cAMP-dependent catalytic; ARAF: v-raf murine sarcoma 3611 viral oncogene homolog; BRAF: v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog; PIK3R 2, 3B: phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit; MAP2K1: mitogen-activated protein 2 kinase 1; KRAS: v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog; MAD2 L1 2B-like: MAD2 mitotic arrest deficient; ADCY 1A, 1B, 3C, 6B, 7: adenylate cyclase; PGR: progesterone receptor; GNAI3: guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein) alpha inhibiting activity polypeptide 3. (PPTX 291 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ribas, L., Pardo, B.G., Fernández, C. et al. A combined strategy involving Sanger and 454 pyrosequencing increases genomic resources to aid in the management of reproduction, disease control and genetic selection in the turbot (Scophthalmus maximus). BMC Genomics 14, 180 (2013).

Download citation


  • Turbot
  • NGS
  • Database
  • Transcriptome
  • Reproduction
  • Immune
  • Genetic Markers
  • SNP
  • Microsatellite
  • Microarray
  • Natural Antisense Transcripts
  • MicroRNA